Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Expertise often does NOT transfer across scientific disciplines! 🙃 These days we have physicians, psychiatrists, ‘human biologists,’ physicists, brilliant entrepreneurs, billionaires, and various REALLY SMART people making REALLY STUPID claims. Many people say “but look how smart they are, they wouldn’t believe in bullshit!” YES THEY ABSOLUTELY WOULD! Don’t... believe me? Just look up ‘Nobel Prize Syndrome’ and you will find a list of many of the smartest people in history who believed in absolute BULLSHIT in other areas of science Linus Pauling won the 1954 Nobel Prize in chemistry & believed ultra high doses of Vitamin C cure everything from the common cold, to cancer, to schizophrenia (it fking doesn’t… this dumbass myth still persists though it may slightly reduce the duration of a cold) William Shockley won the 1956 Nobel Prize for Physics & believed in eugenics James Watson helped discover F*ing DNA. This helped unlock our understanding of human biology, the genome, & completely revolutionized science & medicine as we know it. He also believed black people were inherently less intelligent than other races Brian Josephson won the 1973 Nobel Prize for physics & believed in the refrigerator mother theory of autism & believed in telepathy 🥴 Karey Mullis won the 1993 Nobel Prize in chemistry for developing the polymerase chain reaction which completely revolutionized genetic work. It is a major reason that any work with DNA has now been able to be performed at scale & how small amounts of DNA (at crime scenes for example) can be magnified into amounts that are usable. He believed in Astrology amongst other crazy sh** & claimed to have spoken to a fluorescent raccoon 😑 This is why we have to evaluate each claim on the merit of the claim, NOT on the credentials or accolades of the person making the claim. Because smart people can believe in really dumb sh*t This is why I try to only make really strong claims for things that have STRONG evidence. If something only has modest evidence, I try to make sure I don’t make strong claims on it Always remember Hitchens razor: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” From the Doctor Mike Podcastshow more

Layne Norton, PhD

230,574 subscribers

64,613 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Comedy Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Greg Mushen2 years ago

It makes you wonder if that’s what made them win the Nobel Prize in the first place—the ability to go off the well tread path in the pursuit of a crazy idea—only to stick with it until they actually arrived at the answer. Probably started with people thinking they were chasing some stupid idea.

PUFA Diluter2 years ago

What’s your scientific expertise in given your admission that your PhD was bunk?

Iva2 years ago

As someone who has taught in higher education for a while, expertise doesn’t transfer into effective teaching either

...2 years ago

“And they also thought water was wet; can you believe it?!”

Kilgore2 years ago

This is rampant in the health and wellness space...and don't even get me started on the "longevity" space.

Person of Interest2 years ago

Wrong on Vitamin C. Second most important electron donor behind glutathione. Layne whines “Where’s the human RCT that proves it”. Just stop taking vitamin C bro. Wrong on CICO, terrain matters, fat adapted matters, mitochondrial uncoupling matters, macro comp matters.

Keto Grill & Bakery & Rizz NO GOONERS2 years ago

hanlons razor is peak razor

neet noble2 years ago

'& believed in eugenics' and? you'd be hungry without it

Marko Da Beast2 years ago

People with PhDs tend to be among the worst offenders.

Raphael Sirtoli2 years ago

How dare you invoke Hitchens

Related Videos

☝️ "There have been cases when the committee has awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to people who have done nothing for peace. In my opinion, with these decisions, they have done huge damage to the authority of this prize. A person comes along—good or bad, it doesn't matter—and after a month or two, boom, they are awarded. For what? Whether President Trump deserves the Nobel Prize or not, I don't know, but he really does a lot to solve complex crises. If everything Donald is talking about and trying to do in the Middle East is accomplished, it will be a historical event." - President Putin

☝️ "There have been cases when the committee has awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to people who have done nothing for peace. In my opinion, with these decisions, they have done huge damage to the authority of this prize. A person comes along—good or bad, it doesn't matter—and after a month or two, boom, they are awarded. For what? Whether President Trump deserves the Nobel Prize or not, I don't know, but he really does a lot to solve complex crises. If everything Donald is talking about and trying to do in the Middle East is accomplished, it will be a historical event." - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

18,865 views • 10 months ago

NOBEL PEACE PRIZE RECIPIENT María Corina Machado ON DEDICATING HER PRIZE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP: "Let me be very clear. As soon as I learned that we had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, I dedicated it to President Trump because I believed at that point that he deserved it. And a lot of people, most people said it was impossible to achieve what he has just done on Saturday, January 3rd. So, if I believe he deserved it on October, imagine now. I think he has proven to the world what he means. I mean, January 3rd will go down in history as the day justice defeated a tyranny. It's a milestone. And it's not only huge for the Venezuelan people and our future. I think it's a huge step for humanity, for freedom, and for human dignity."

NOBEL PEACE PRIZE RECIPIENT María Corina Machado ON DEDICATING HER PRIZE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP: "Let me be very clear. As soon as I learned that we had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, I dedicated it to President Trump because I believed at that point that he deserved it. And a lot of people, most people said it was impossible to achieve what he has just done on Saturday, January 3rd. So, if I believe he deserved it on October, imagine now. I think he has proven to the world what he means. I mean, January 3rd will go down in history as the day justice defeated a tyranny. It's a milestone. And it's not only huge for the Venezuelan people and our future. I think it's a huge step for humanity, for freedom, and for human dignity."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

152,510 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸 REP. BRIAN MAST: “THEY NEED TO GIVE TRUMP THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE” “This is monumental. Everybody's been talking about, will he get the Nobel Peace Prize? Those groups of academics and elites sitting in Norway… they need to give President Trump the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts on this, India-Pakistan, Armenia-Azerbaijan, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Rwanda. He’s done more in 10 months to make it actually mean something when people say, the full weight and force of the United States of America. I think they believe in peace through pandering, but just thank God for the work that President Trump, his envoy Steve Whitkoff, Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, have been doing on this.” Source: Aaron Rupar

🇺🇸 REP. BRIAN MAST: “THEY NEED TO GIVE TRUMP THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE” “This is monumental. Everybody's been talking about, will he get the Nobel Peace Prize? Those groups of academics and elites sitting in Norway… they need to give President Trump the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts on this, India-Pakistan, Armenia-Azerbaijan, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Rwanda. He’s done more in 10 months to make it actually mean something when people say, the full weight and force of the United States of America. I think they believe in peace through pandering, but just thank God for the work that President Trump, his envoy Steve Whitkoff, Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, have been doing on this.” Source: Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

151,871 views • 10 months ago

Christopher Nolan claims modern society blindly accepts scientific facts on faith the exact same way ancient Greeks believed in Zeus "For people who would have lived in that time, for whom in a pre-scientific era, evidence of divinity is everywhere. And so, the existence of gods is not an article of faith, it's simple reality." "So, thunder and lightning is God speaking to them, or the state of the ocean is moved by the gods. They have no other explanation for it." "And so, just as we accept things from science as absolute fact... the earth is round and we travel around the sun. We can't know these things. We take them as faith because they're presented to us as facts." "The same would be true of the theological structure that explains nature to people of that time. And so for me, the gods are real, but they are inside the people. They are being projected by the people."

Christopher Nolan claims modern society blindly accepts scientific facts on faith the exact same way ancient Greeks believed in Zeus "For people who would have lived in that time, for whom in a pre-scientific era, evidence of divinity is everywhere. And so, the existence of gods is not an article of faith, it's simple reality." "So, thunder and lightning is God speaking to them, or the state of the ocean is moved by the gods. They have no other explanation for it." "And so, just as we accept things from science as absolute fact... the earth is round and we travel around the sun. We can't know these things. We take them as faith because they're presented to us as facts." "The same would be true of the theological structure that explains nature to people of that time. And so for me, the gods are real, but they are inside the people. They are being projected by the people."

Nichole

31,241 views • 17 days ago

This is concerning on so many levels: "No one knows what those proteins are doing" Professor Robert Clancy: "the Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA [but the] pseudouridine [was producing]—instead of a spike protein—something completely strange and different" That Nobel Prize in 2023 meets a peer reviewed study from Cambridge, which might have outlined a mechanism behind why embalmers are seeing the "strange rubbery clots" in the deceased. AND, the Yale evidence of persistent spike production of 709 x days, however that's happening, gives a cautionary but plausible amyloidogenic mechanism for abnormal proteins to be produced both acutely and for extended periods. Professor Robert Clancy: "the Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better" "Within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid, which can cause dementia [and] they found this within weeks and months of people being vaccinated" "They worked out that the mechanism was because the pseudouridine [was producing]—instead of a spike protein—something completely strange and different"

This is concerning on so many levels: "No one knows what those proteins are doing" Professor Robert Clancy: "the Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA [but the] pseudouridine [was producing]—instead of a spike protein—something completely strange and different" That Nobel Prize in 2023 meets a peer reviewed study from Cambridge, which might have outlined a mechanism behind why embalmers are seeing the "strange rubbery clots" in the deceased. AND, the Yale evidence of persistent spike production of 709 x days, however that's happening, gives a cautionary but plausible amyloidogenic mechanism for abnormal proteins to be produced both acutely and for extended periods. Professor Robert Clancy: "the Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better" "Within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid, which can cause dementia [and] they found this within weeks and months of people being vaccinated" "They worked out that the mechanism was because the pseudouridine [was producing]—instead of a spike protein—something completely strange and different"

Humanspective

202,591 views • 1 year ago

Hamas committed the crime of kinocide during the October 7 attacks. They forced men at gunpoint to have sex with their sisters and daughters, something we really haven’t seen in the world since Rwanda. And yet in our Western media outlets and on our Western campuses, we Jews became the aggressors and oppressors. 1,200 Jews were butchered and burned alive, mutilated and beheaded in their homes, in their kitchens, at their dance parties for peace. They raped dozens and dozens of Israeli women and girls. They took 251 people hostage, stolen from their homes, and kept them in dark, dank holes, deep underground. And yet at the United Nations—which was created in many ways to ensure that never again would anything like this happen to the Jewish people or to any people in the world—we Jews became the violators of human rights. It's preposterous. Where does it come from—this moral inversion, this moral distortion of everything we have always believed in, everything we have ever cared about? How do we fix it? And that is really the question I started trying to answer, the question that led me on this journey of giving speeches all over the country, in almost all 50 states over the last three years, at hundreds of schools, colleges, law schools, and churches of every denomination. Along the way, I have had thousands of conversations with people about Israel, many of whom see the world very differently than I do. And what I came to realize is each of these people who is chanting about Israel, they've come to believe one or more of these six main claims about Israel. The good news is, each of the six claims is totally false. The other good news is that all of these claims are, at their core, legal claims. We do not have to shout at each other about politics. The problem with politics is that two people just shout at each other and they're never going to find common ground, because they're looking at different things that they're interested in and that they care about, and they're playing by different rules. They’re not playing on the same field. In the law, there's only one set of rules. It applies to everybody, whether you're black, brown, or white, whether you're a man or a woman, whether you're Jewish, Muslim, or Christian. Everybody has to comply with the law. So I thought, why not apply the same legal methodology that we have been applying for hundreds of years in courtrooms all across this country—a methodology that we know and trust because we use it where truth-telling matters most? That is the methodology I apply to each of these six claims in the book.

Hamas committed the crime of kinocide during the October 7 attacks. They forced men at gunpoint to have sex with their sisters and daughters, something we really haven’t seen in the world since Rwanda. And yet in our Western media outlets and on our Western campuses, we Jews became the aggressors and oppressors. 1,200 Jews were butchered and burned alive, mutilated and beheaded in their homes, in their kitchens, at their dance parties for peace. They raped dozens and dozens of Israeli women and girls. They took 251 people hostage, stolen from their homes, and kept them in dark, dank holes, deep underground. And yet at the United Nations—which was created in many ways to ensure that never again would anything like this happen to the Jewish people or to any people in the world—we Jews became the violators of human rights. It's preposterous. Where does it come from—this moral inversion, this moral distortion of everything we have always believed in, everything we have ever cared about? How do we fix it? And that is really the question I started trying to answer, the question that led me on this journey of giving speeches all over the country, in almost all 50 states over the last three years, at hundreds of schools, colleges, law schools, and churches of every denomination. Along the way, I have had thousands of conversations with people about Israel, many of whom see the world very differently than I do. And what I came to realize is each of these people who is chanting about Israel, they've come to believe one or more of these six main claims about Israel. The good news is, each of the six claims is totally false. The other good news is that all of these claims are, at their core, legal claims. We do not have to shout at each other about politics. The problem with politics is that two people just shout at each other and they're never going to find common ground, because they're looking at different things that they're interested in and that they care about, and they're playing by different rules. They’re not playing on the same field. In the law, there's only one set of rules. It applies to everybody, whether you're black, brown, or white, whether you're a man or a woman, whether you're Jewish, Muslim, or Christian. Everybody has to comply with the law. So I thought, why not apply the same legal methodology that we have been applying for hundreds of years in courtrooms all across this country—a methodology that we know and trust because we use it where truth-telling matters most? That is the methodology I apply to each of these six claims in the book.

Roy K. Altman

158,098 views • 1 month ago

World Renowned Oncologist says there’s no informed consent with mRNA tech, as the Nobel Prize winning Pseudouridine takes the stage. The order looks backwards: 1. Inject billions. 2. Give them a Nobel Prize. 3. Publish a peer reviewed paper finding something unexpected. Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP - “It should be clear to everyone. Pseudouridine modified mRNA were used for the first time in the population... NEVER BEFORE.” Months after Pseudouridine won the Nobel Prize, a peer reviewed paper was published saying this “upgraded” technology is leading to the production of “strange proteins in the body”. Professor Clancy says: “No one knows what those proteins are doing”. “The Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better... within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid”

World Renowned Oncologist says there’s no informed consent with mRNA tech, as the Nobel Prize winning Pseudouridine takes the stage. The order looks backwards: 1. Inject billions. 2. Give them a Nobel Prize. 3. Publish a peer reviewed paper finding something unexpected. Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP - “It should be clear to everyone. Pseudouridine modified mRNA were used for the first time in the population... NEVER BEFORE.” Months after Pseudouridine won the Nobel Prize, a peer reviewed paper was published saying this “upgraded” technology is leading to the production of “strange proteins in the body”. Professor Clancy says: “No one knows what those proteins are doing”. “The Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better... within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid”

Humanspective

76,753 views • 2 months ago

The Video Interview Of Kary Mullis That Destroys The Controlled Narrative. In this 5 minute car crash interview in 2005 for the Nobel Prize Comity, a Prize awarded to him in print for (Included in the thread) " The Biomedical applications of the PCR method are already legion. Now that it is possible to discover very small amounts of foreign DNA in an organism, viral and bacterial infections can be diagnosed without the time-consuming culture of Micro-organisms". In this interview Mullis: Claims 30m people died of the Spanish Flu and it is "going to happen again". Says that Bird Flu is real and says that that is how infectious diseases occur from spread from animals to humans. Says that he owns a Pharmaceutical Company (Altermune- that had a $2m investment from DARPA) making drugs to combat "viral infection". Says that he experiments on Mice and Rats (Animal Torture). Says that a Vaccine for HIV "Would be useful". Does not contest the existence of "HIV". Does not contest that a Vaccine would work against "HIV". Does not contest Vaccination at all. Says that in his opinion AIDS is caused by many RetroViruses. So to confirm Kary Mullis works for Big Pharma and The State pushing drugs, viruses and vaccines. Shame on you if you ever pushed this tinpot fraud as being anything other that Fauci in sheep's clothing.

The Video Interview Of Kary Mullis That Destroys The Controlled Narrative. In this 5 minute car crash interview in 2005 for the Nobel Prize Comity, a Prize awarded to him in print for (Included in the thread) " The Biomedical applications of the PCR method are already legion. Now that it is possible to discover very small amounts of foreign DNA in an organism, viral and bacterial infections can be diagnosed without the time-consuming culture of Micro-organisms". In this interview Mullis: Claims 30m people died of the Spanish Flu and it is "going to happen again". Says that Bird Flu is real and says that that is how infectious diseases occur from spread from animals to humans. Says that he owns a Pharmaceutical Company (Altermune- that had a $2m investment from DARPA) making drugs to combat "viral infection". Says that he experiments on Mice and Rats (Animal Torture). Says that a Vaccine for HIV "Would be useful". Does not contest the existence of "HIV". Does not contest that a Vaccine would work against "HIV". Does not contest Vaccination at all. Says that in his opinion AIDS is caused by many RetroViruses. So to confirm Kary Mullis works for Big Pharma and The State pushing drugs, viruses and vaccines. Shame on you if you ever pushed this tinpot fraud as being anything other that Fauci in sheep's clothing.

Jamie Andrews

10,650 views • 7 days ago

🔥 OF COURSE JUST NOW THE NOBEL PRIZE COMMITTEE TOLD MACHADO SHE CANT GIVE IT TO TRUMP. Who cares about this USLESS POLITICAL GLOBALIST SWEDE GROUP. They gave Obama the prize for PEACE BOMBS MONTHS IN to try to make him seem like a VALID PRESIDENT & NOT A PUPPET. The craziest part about the Nobel Prize you have to nominated before JANUARY 31ST..SO OBAMA WAS NOMINATED 11 DAYS AFTER HIS INAUGURATION LOL That entire prizes like most are how THE ELITES REWARD EACH OTHER. Here is what those puppets said "Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to others, the institute said in a statement. "The decision is final and stands for all “ Personally our great President deserves BETTER THAN THAT PRIZE & one befitting of all he has done.

🔥 OF COURSE JUST NOW THE NOBEL PRIZE COMMITTEE TOLD MACHADO SHE CANT GIVE IT TO TRUMP. Who cares about this USLESS POLITICAL GLOBALIST SWEDE GROUP. They gave Obama the prize for PEACE BOMBS MONTHS IN to try to make him seem like a VALID PRESIDENT & NOT A PUPPET. The craziest part about the Nobel Prize you have to nominated before JANUARY 31ST..SO OBAMA WAS NOMINATED 11 DAYS AFTER HIS INAUGURATION LOL That entire prizes like most are how THE ELITES REWARD EACH OTHER. Here is what those puppets said "Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to others, the institute said in a statement. "The decision is final and stands for all “ Personally our great President deserves BETTER THAN THAT PRIZE & one befitting of all he has done.

Johnny St.Pete

18,399 views • 7 months ago

🚨NEW: Batya Ungar-Sargon on Trump getting SNUBBED for Nobel Peace Prize: "It was, as my people would call it, a shonda — an absolute disgrace." "The prize was announced just 36 hours after the president secured a peace deal to release all of the remaining hostages in Hamas captivity in Gaza. It was an astonishing feat celebrated both in the streets of Gaza and in the streets of Tel Aviv and beyond." "Just consider for a minute what it takes to end a war and to have both sides hail you as a hero! Consider the resistance Trump had to overcome on both sides!" "There's only one way to feel in a moment like this: immense pride as Americans and for what our president has accomplished for humanity. How can this person not have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize!?" "Resentment. It's the only answer. The same kind that engulfs the Democrats equally unable to give him the credit he deserves. Never mind. The Nobel Committee just solidified its irrelevance. Peace, of course, is its own reward." Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Batya Ungar-Sargon on Trump getting SNUBBED for Nobel Peace Prize: "It was, as my people would call it, a shonda — an absolute disgrace." "The prize was announced just 36 hours after the president secured a peace deal to release all of the remaining hostages in Hamas captivity in Gaza. It was an astonishing feat celebrated both in the streets of Gaza and in the streets of Tel Aviv and beyond." "Just consider for a minute what it takes to end a war and to have both sides hail you as a hero! Consider the resistance Trump had to overcome on both sides!" "There's only one way to feel in a moment like this: immense pride as Americans and for what our president has accomplished for humanity. How can this person not have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize!?" "Resentment. It's the only answer. The same kind that engulfs the Democrats equally unable to give him the credit he deserves. Never mind. The Nobel Committee just solidified its irrelevance. Peace, of course, is its own reward." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

30,379 views • 10 months ago

US President Trump on why there are US troops in Syria: Because we're trying to make sure that there's going to be and remain peace in the Middle East, and Syria is a big part of it. The new leader is a strong person, and that's what you need. We got rid of Assad, we got rid of other people that were really bad people, and that we're in the way of peace in the Middle East. You know, we have legitimate peace in the Middle East, for the first time in 3,000 years.

US President Trump on why there are US troops in Syria: Because we're trying to make sure that there's going to be and remain peace in the Middle East, and Syria is a big part of it. The new leader is a strong person, and that's what you need. We got rid of Assad, we got rid of other people that were really bad people, and that we're in the way of peace in the Middle East. You know, we have legitimate peace in the Middle East, for the first time in 3,000 years.

Levant24

38,046 views • 8 months ago

🚨 🚨🚨🚨 Shocking podcast with world renowned oncologist Dr. Wafik El-Deiry! - Exposes COVID Spike protein’s cancer link! - Urges autopsies to be done and slams pharma trolls discrediting his work - Calls for FBI & Homeland Security to act. --------------------- Because I look at P53 as controlling a host response that keeps us healthy, keeps us from developing cancer. And here, when we express the spike protein, whether it's coming from infection or a VACCINE, it seemed to interact with the function of P53 and attenuate it. ------------------------- On mRNA persistence: "We've read reports about the spike protein traveling and disseminating. I mean one of the interesting things with the mRNA vaccines, I mean it won the Nobel Prize. You know, normally RNA, if you breathe on it, it degrades and goes away. The Nobel prize winning discovery was if you substitute pseudouridine in the RNA it becomes STABLE. -------------------------- On DNA Plasmid Contamination: “I keep an open mind. I think the mechanisms are plausible… People have been pretty dismissive of the DNA fragments, the potential persistence of plasmid DNA that COULD REPLICATE and get into the genome. INTEGRATION events in the human genome are well known… you can get cancer. This is known with gene therapy that has decades of knowledge and experience. People say well you know, these fragments or these plans, they don’t get into the cells, they don’t get into the nucleus, whatever. I mean the lipid nanoparticles TAKE THEM THERE.” -------------------------- I would urge people to think about doing those AUTOPSIES to help mankind." ---------------------------- On Pharma trolls: "there’s a small group of people who work together and they use aliases… and fake accounts...I think our government, I think Homeland Security, the FBI… need to do something about it."

🚨 🚨🚨🚨 Shocking podcast with world renowned oncologist Dr. Wafik El-Deiry! - Exposes COVID Spike protein’s cancer link! - Urges autopsies to be done and slams pharma trolls discrediting his work - Calls for FBI & Homeland Security to act. --------------------- Because I look at P53 as controlling a host response that keeps us healthy, keeps us from developing cancer. And here, when we express the spike protein, whether it's coming from infection or a VACCINE, it seemed to interact with the function of P53 and attenuate it. ------------------------- On mRNA persistence: "We've read reports about the spike protein traveling and disseminating. I mean one of the interesting things with the mRNA vaccines, I mean it won the Nobel Prize. You know, normally RNA, if you breathe on it, it degrades and goes away. The Nobel prize winning discovery was if you substitute pseudouridine in the RNA it becomes STABLE. -------------------------- On DNA Plasmid Contamination: “I keep an open mind. I think the mechanisms are plausible… People have been pretty dismissive of the DNA fragments, the potential persistence of plasmid DNA that COULD REPLICATE and get into the genome. INTEGRATION events in the human genome are well known… you can get cancer. This is known with gene therapy that has decades of knowledge and experience. People say well you know, these fragments or these plans, they don’t get into the cells, they don’t get into the nucleus, whatever. I mean the lipid nanoparticles TAKE THEM THERE.” -------------------------- I would urge people to think about doing those AUTOPSIES to help mankind." ---------------------------- On Pharma trolls: "there’s a small group of people who work together and they use aliases… and fake accounts...I think our government, I think Homeland Security, the FBI… need to do something about it."

aussie17

79,556 views • 11 months ago

Most people choose belonging over accuracy. The desire to fit in overpowers the desire for truth. "A lot of the time, people will tell you, “Don’t care what other people think about you,” but we all care what other people think—often for very good reason, which is that if people think well of you, it benefits you in life. It puts you in a good position; you are rewarded for it. It helps you accomplish things. It makes you safer. It just feels good. Belonging is a critical part of being human. However, especially in the modern world, the desire to belong can often run counter to the desire to understand or be accurate. If you have to choose between “I could believe this thing and be ostracized or criticized or outcast from my community” or “I could believe this other thing, which may not be that accurate, but it will get me praised and rewarded and accepted by my community,” a lot of the time, the desire to belong overpowers the desire to understand." James Clear on The Knowledge Project

Most people choose belonging over accuracy. The desire to fit in overpowers the desire for truth. "A lot of the time, people will tell you, “Don’t care what other people think about you,” but we all care what other people think—often for very good reason, which is that if people think well of you, it benefits you in life. It puts you in a good position; you are rewarded for it. It helps you accomplish things. It makes you safer. It just feels good. Belonging is a critical part of being human. However, especially in the modern world, the desire to belong can often run counter to the desire to understand or be accurate. If you have to choose between “I could believe this thing and be ostracized or criticized or outcast from my community” or “I could believe this other thing, which may not be that accurate, but it will get me praised and rewarded and accepted by my community,” a lot of the time, the desire to belong overpowers the desire to understand." James Clear on The Knowledge Project

Shane Parrish

63,966 views • 7 months ago

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

aussie17

440,071 views • 2 years ago

Microbiologist Kevin McKernan discovered concerning levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, including Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters tied to cancer development in humans: "It's in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn't have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you'll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that's used to make the RNA... Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there's a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA... At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what's known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It's not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you're not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up... If you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don't need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So there's a history of being concerned over SV40. Having the promoter inside some of these vectors isn't necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it's still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn't really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We've made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated." Kevin McKernan Daniel Horowitz

Microbiologist Kevin McKernan discovered concerning levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, including Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters tied to cancer development in humans: "It's in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn't have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you'll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that's used to make the RNA... Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there's a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA... At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what's known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It's not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you're not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up... If you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don't need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So there's a history of being concerned over SV40. Having the promoter inside some of these vectors isn't necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it's still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn't really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We've made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated." Kevin McKernan Daniel Horowitz

KanekoaTheGreat

566,899 views • 3 years ago

The Washington Post’s Natalie Allison: “You said, ‘glory be to God in this conflict.’ do you believe that God supports the United States actions in this war and have you sought His direction?” President Trump: “I do, because God is good and I — because God is good, and God wants to see people taken care of. God doesn’t like what’s happening. I don’t like what’s happening. Everyone says I enjoy it. I don’t enjoy this. I don’t enjoy it. These two guys don’t enjoy it. You know, people say, ‘oh boy, they’re so tough.’ They don’t want — they don’t like, I don’t like seeing people killed. I’ve ended eight wars. Nobody’s ever done it. The person who won the Nobel Prize came to me and said, you deserve the Nobel Prize. She announced that when they announced, they said — goes to Maria, she’s a great person, really a good person — she said, no, no, no, this is ridiculous. They gave me the Nobel Prize. President Trump ended eight wars. I could go over every one of them, including India and Pakistan, where the prime minister of Pakistan said President Trump saved from 30 to 50 million lives. That makes me much happier than what we’re doing right now. That makes me much happier. We have one more to end, by the way.”

The Washington Post’s Natalie Allison: “You said, ‘glory be to God in this conflict.’ do you believe that God supports the United States actions in this war and have you sought His direction?” President Trump: “I do, because God is good and I — because God is good, and God wants to see people taken care of. God doesn’t like what’s happening. I don’t like what’s happening. Everyone says I enjoy it. I don’t enjoy this. I don’t enjoy it. These two guys don’t enjoy it. You know, people say, ‘oh boy, they’re so tough.’ They don’t want — they don’t like, I don’t like seeing people killed. I’ve ended eight wars. Nobody’s ever done it. The person who won the Nobel Prize came to me and said, you deserve the Nobel Prize. She announced that when they announced, they said — goes to Maria, she’s a great person, really a good person — she said, no, no, no, this is ridiculous. They gave me the Nobel Prize. President Trump ended eight wars. I could go over every one of them, including India and Pakistan, where the prime minister of Pakistan said President Trump saved from 30 to 50 million lives. That makes me much happier than what we’re doing right now. That makes me much happier. We have one more to end, by the way.”

Curtis Houck

16,745 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

675,936 views • 7 months ago

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

17,791 views • 3 months ago