正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

EXPLAINED: Labour’s plan for childcare 👇

144,855 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

⚒️ on 𝕏 的头像
⚒️ on 𝕏2 年前

Oops no clue, no change

K8 的头像
K82 年前

What do I think? A lesson in propagandistic lies. They want MORE parents working, more taxes & manipulate parents to think putting their child in daycare is “best” for life chances whilst doing nothing to support the primacy of home. None of it is evidenced. None of it.

BLAIM GAME 的头像
BLAIM GAME2 年前

How will you fund this when you can’t even explain how you will accommodate the children leaving private education because of your tax increase on their fees?

Scott 的头像
Scott2 年前

You look like someone who orders lemon and herb at Nandos. Like a wrongun.

Ye Olde Holborn☣️ 的头像
Ye Olde Holborn☣️2 年前

I wouldn’t let you near kids

Robert Beard 的头像
Robert Beard2 年前

This photograph says everything I need to know about @UKLabour under @Keir_Starmer and how much they care about children.

JaneJuan 的头像
JaneJuan2 年前

Say's a man that doesn't know what a woman is. Labour’s nurseries: where kids get an early start on political correctness = indoctrination. How about we let mums and dads take the reins if they prefer? Less government meddling, more time for parents to bond with their kids—and maybe even teach them how to think for themselves! After all the idea that getting women with children to work is primarily about increasing tax revenue. #VOTE #Independents @reformparty_uk @WorkersPartyGB #HungParliament

Edward 的头像
Edward2 年前

Has anybody in Labour researched this. 3 years and above requires 1 adult per 8 children. So the minimum of nursery staff you require is circa 12,500. Let's say the staff are over 21 years old and work 35 hrs a week & paid minimum wage of £11.44 per hour. ....

Nick Newman 的头像
Nick Newman2 年前

Ooh I can solve this one …. Simple : 1. Collect the money collected by @_LFI and that MPs have received from private health care donors 2. Tax the UK billionaires a little more 3. Invest it in childcare places 👍 …. You’re welcome ☺️

相关视频