Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

šŸ“¢ Exploding Mic Theorists… Tyler Robinson Theorists… Drone Theorists… How do yall explain a man whose movements are 100% consistent with aiming and firing a palm pistol; complete with visible muzzle flash(gunpowder sparks), bullet swirl, and the loud BANG? Watch it for yourself. The evidence don’t lie. Drop your...

954,242 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨BOMBSHELL: Drone CAUGHT ON VIDEO Above Charlie Kirk at the MOMENT Of The SHOT –Mystery DRONE HOVERS Exactly Where the Shot Originated According To All The EVIDENCE šŸŖ°šŸŽÆ Just a Reminder: We Believe Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated by a Sniper Drone from His Right Side – And the Video Evidence Speaks for Itself. Based on multiple lines of evidence, including sound analysis using echolocation to trace the origin, less credible but notable crack-boom analysis, a projectile visibly captured on camera, and the pressure wave (the visible pressure disturbance created as the bullet slows from supersonic down to subsonic) that we originally mistook for a muzzle flash reflection in one of the windows of the BA building, but closer examination reveals it as the aerodynamic signature of a high-velocity round. We conclude the shot came from a drone positioned over Kirk's right side. In this video from the event shown below, we can see an unidentified drone hovering precisely on Kirk's right flank—the exact location our analysis indicates as the source. This aligns with advanced military capabilities, such as those detailed in declassified UAP documents from the US Military as well as the capabilities of Israel's number one drone manufacturer "Elbit System" which not-so coincidentally has a facility right there in Utah. If this was a drone strike, who authorized it, and why the cover-up? Tag Candace Owens and Retweet if you're demanding a full investigation, and drop a šŸ”Ž in the comments if you agree the evidence points to foul play.

Project Constitution

485,225 views • 8 months ago

Lindsay Clancy conspiracy theorists are so focused on harassing Patrick Clancy and his wife that we have content creators lying and refusing to correct the lie when confronted by the people involved. Intent creators have spread fiction that Patrick Clancy’s now wife, Rachel Danis, was his mistress and that they went to Costa Rica together after the kids’ funeral. Not only is there so much wrong with this based on the idiotic ā€œscreenshot evidenceā€ of a review, the actual woman who made the review has come forward. She is an entirely different woman with the same name. Now this woman and the innocent man whose business she left a review on are being harassed by strangers who are raging out to project their trauma onto people they know nothing about. She has reached out to creators and tried to get them to remove the content and correct it, and they have ignored her. Lying about a man and his wife is not supporting women. These people do not care about this tragedy or Lindsay Clancy. They’re bored and want engagement, which is fine unless you are actually hurting real people. Don’t even get me started on the comments, where people are literally commenting about it being Patrick’s wife on this woman’s explanation video while not reading or watching the content. This woman’s video with factual information barely got any reach, while slop content creators posting trash get millions of views on posts they never fact check. We are screwed as a society. Link:

Lauren Neidigh

21,233 views • 5 days ago

Is This You Jack Posobiec Publicly Supporting a Future De Facto Theocratic MAGA Christian Integralism Nation? Two video clips for the price of one! Posobiec suggests replacing our Republic with a Theocracy—it appears the voice in the background is Steve Bannon! The integralist proposal disturbs many people (including Catholics) because integralists reject liberal freedom of religion and embraces religious coercion. Given the untoward implications of integralism, most familiar with the view set it aside on the basis of an argument like the following: 1) If integralism is true, religious coercion is not wrong. 2) But religious coercion is wrong. 3) Therefore, integralism is false. I don’t think integralism can be so easily dismissed. The reason is that integralism has a certain elegance and simplicity and even obviousness. It tells us that states should help people achieve their ultimate good. Besides feasibility worries, why wouldn’t this be the best thing for the state to do? Are non-integralists really asking the state to do less than the best? Doesn’t that just sound crazy when we state it openly? What anti-integralists need is a satisfying explanation as to why integralism is axiologically false. The anti-integralist need to explain why integralism has the wrong conceptions of value, reasons, and practical rationality. The more time I spent with their position, the harder I find it is to articulate attractive alternatives approaches that are compatible with Christian belief. I now think integralism can only be answered with some fundamental revisions to standard theistic ethical theories, in particular natural law theory and divine command theory. We need a theistic deontology, but one where side-constraints are grounded in the divine nature (most natural rights theorists ground rights in the divine nature only obliquely). I think I can convey the power of the integralist challenge by using an analogy with act-consequentialism in normative ethics (which holds that the right acts are those that maximize well-being). Integralism and act-consequentialism are simple, elegant theories with seemingly untoward implications, but they are so elegant that many theorists will adopt the view and simply accept the implications. And even good men will do so, like Peter Singer (a lead consequentialist) and Adrian Vermeule (a lead integralist). Written by Kevin Vallier 2019. Personally I want nothing more than for Turning Point USA to succeed. Clarification is needed as to why the organization actively promotes an individual that has a vision for America that is antithetical to our Constitution! Link to Vallier article in reply section.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

17,780 views • 5 months ago

I feel weird even bringing this up, but here we go. Subscriptions are open on my page. There is no graceful way to say that, so please take this with a kind heart. I know a lot of people are struggling financially, and I don’t want anyone stretching themselves for me. I have a great job. I’m just letting people know it exists because some of you asked. I’m not even saying I’m worth the money. I’ll be honest, I’m not the best person to subscribe to. I’m not an OnlyFans girl, I’m not teaching you how to get monetized, I’m not running a masterclass in anything. The subscriber section is literally just more personal, everyday stuff. It’s boring in a comforting way. You’re not missing anything. If you ever feel like hanging out with me on the quieter side of this app, it’s there. If not, all good. I just wanted to put it out there for anyone who might be interested. Pro tip: if you subscribe to anyone, please do it on a browser. If you do it through the Apple Store or the Google store, they take 30% and put it in their pocket. Those companies are rich enough. I have a real problem with them getting any money or subscribers. I didn’t know that when I first started subscribing to people. PS: if you are a current subscriber or a new subscriber, please go to my homepage and click on the subs tab. I post content there, but it doesn’t automatically show up in your feed. PPS: Please don’t be nasty to me in the comments if you don’t want to subscribe. I’m not a mean person. I can’t think of a humble way to tell people. This wasn’t easy for me to write.

Sovey

21,268 views • 9 months ago

Marcus Freeman said, "You can't talk your way into winning a National Championship. You can't talk your way into being a Hall of Famer...You got to work and you got to constantly focus on improvement." You have to show up and do the work. Your work ethic is something that you can control. • It means competing. • It means committing. • It means showing up consistently. People see success, but they don't see the hard work and preparation it takes. 5 Steps to Improve Your Work Ethic and Focus: 1. Be Intentional About How Your Work - Show up every day with a clear purpose on what you will prepare and why. Think about the quality of your practice, the details, and reflect on where to focus most. This approach ensures your working towards improvement and growth. 2. Show up Committed Every Day - Don't just participate, show up, and commit. It means compete and choose to go above-and-beyond every day. Have a positive attitude and dedicate yourself to what you are doing. When you're focused, present, and engaged that is when growth starts to happen. 3. Be Consistent - You have to be consistent with your habits and work ethic. It means committing to the process of improving and putting in the time. Success doesn't happen overnight, it's the result of consistently showing up and doing the work day in and day out. 4. Prepare Mentally and Physically - This means think about your physical and mental state when you are practicing and when you will perform. Understand what environment allows you to perform your best. Use mindfulness to think about the connection between your mind and body. 5. Create a Plan for When Obstacles Arise - Don’t just imagine the great outcome, visualize what may stop you from reaching it. Prepare for the obstacles. Write them down and plan how you’ll overcome them. This keeps you prepared and resilient when challenges come your way. Takeaway: Talent can you get you into many rooms, but it's your work ethic, focus, and attitude that keep you there. - - - The video comes from Marcus Freeman's interview with Pivot Podcast. A great listen for all coaches, parents, teachers, and athletes out there! Follow me Coach AJ šŸŽÆ Mental Fitness more posts on resilience, leadership, and mindset.

Coach AJ šŸŽÆ Mental Fitness

108,873 views • 1 year ago

Bia Omojuwa JJ. Omojuwa , you have been selected to be exposed. You saying that, ā€œThe issue with our foreign exchange is our foreign exchangeā€, statement you attributed to Peter Obi is stupid, simply exposed the entire emptiness of your head, is a loud announcement of your own shallow grasp of language, economics, and critical reasoning. First, what you heard is a rhetorical device known as antimetabole, the deliberate repetition of words in reverse order to expose a deeper truth. It is not a tongue twister. It is a sharp critique of how Nigeria’s foreign exchange crisis is caused not by external forces but by how we ourselves manage, manipulate, and mishandle the system. You thought it was gibberish because your ears function faster than your brain. You heard words and panicked. Second, the line is conceptually layered. In just a few words, it diagnoses the entire economic dysfunction: policy inconsistency, artificial rates, corruption in forex allocation, and institutional failure. But of course, to catch that, you would need more than ears. You would need understanding, something you have never encountered. Third, it is what we call economy of language, the ability to say so much with so little. That level of expression requires thought. You, on the other hand, just react. You heard a sentence that challenged your comprehension and defaulted to mockery because critical thought is foreign to you. You think volume equals intelligence and that confidence can cover for comprehension. It can’t. Let us be clear. The statement isn’t stupid. You are. Loud, clueless, and proud of it. You don’t recognize depth because your mind never developed the tools to measure it. You heard a profound line and mistook it for nonsense. That says everything about you and nothing about Peter Obi. Next time you hear something that confuses you, do not speak. Just nod and walk away. You might save yourself from yet another public display of illiteracy. Not everything is meant for surface thinkers. While you’re at it, try and get some sleep. You look sick and completely unkempt, judging by the eyebags, the cracked lips, and the four conflicting facial tones fighting for attention.

š‘»š‘Æš‘¬ š‘®š‘¬š‘µš‘¬š‘¹š‘Øš‘³ š‘ŗš‘µš‘¶š‘¾ šŸ‡ØšŸ‡®

95,847 views • 1 year ago

The McAlberts and ALL of their mouth pieces ALWAYS lie. Literally everything they say is a lie. Everything they say can be ā€œdebunkedā€ so easily with actual receipts and evidence. Here is Jen McCabe’s bff, Mama Llama (who also is friends with / knows Hank Brennan on a personal level) talking about how Colin Albert was ā€œdragged into this more than a year after John’s death by Aidan Kearney on his first canton cover up blog.ā€ — THAT IS FALSE. On June 9, 2022 Karen Read was arrested for a second time at her home after her manslaughter charges were upgraded to 2nd degree murder. During the booking process, talking to Massachusetts State Police Karen says: ā€œok, you’re aware he (John) was beaten up by Brian and Colin Albert? I mean, we’re all in on the same joke right? My taillight was cracked and John was pulverizedā€ This bodycam footage with audio of Karen in the background implementing Brian and Colin directly refutes MamaLama’s claims that Aidan Kearney ā€œmanufacturedā€ this narrative more than a year later šŸ™„šŸ¤„šŸ¤„ On June 9, 2022 none of us even knew who #KarenRead was & Aidan’s first blog wasn’t posted until April 18, 2023, ALMOST A YEAR AFTER KAREN NAMED COLIN AS A 3RD PARTY SUSPECT TO THE POLICE. The McAlberts and their mouthpieces are ALL liars. They know we know they are lying and they still lie. It’s all a manipulation tactic, major gaslighting & desperate projection to continue playing victim and ā€œinnocent witnessesā€ in this case— So here is a friendly reminder that they are not victims. If you are new to this case, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. Watch all the court hearings. Watch both trial 1 and 2. Read the filings. The evidence (or lack thereof) speaks for itself. #JohnOKeefe was not hit by a car. #KarenRead was FRAMED by Massachusetts State Police and Canton Police. The McAlberts and their mouthpieces only hate Aidan Kearney for exposing them, exposing their relationships/connections to each other, and exposing all of the corruption in Norfolk County. Period. Full stop. Vote for Adam Deitch for District Attorney for Norfolk County District Attorney to clean the swamp 🫔

Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe)

25,442 views • 7 months ago

šŸ”„šŸšØBREAKING: ā€œKeep this N*gga In Jailā€Jauan Rashun Porter, the 30-year-old man who threatened to k*** President Trump on TikTok Live was sentenced to 3 years in prison for his words and the DOJ started facing accusations of abuse of power. The media and liberal Influencers conveniently hid his words, here they are: Porter: "So there's only one way to make America great and that is putting a bullet in between Trump's eyes, I'm gonna kill Donald Trump, I'm gonna put a 7.62 bullet inside of his forehead," with a "Soviet short round "I'm gonna watch him bleed out and I'm gonna watch him die…I'm gonna do that. Yes. Yes. Me." I could say it three more times for you." In response to a request for his location, You'll know. It'll be on the news… his rally is coming up pretty soon and I'm going there and I'm going to put a bullet in his head. I am going to kill the President of the United States. A brief back-and-forth ensued. The host then asked: "So you're claiming that you're going to put a bullet in the President's head and then you're going to take your own life?" The accused allegedly responded: "7.62, exactly." When the host asked the user to repeat the statements once more, he allegedly switched up his bullet preference and said, "5.56 in Donald Trump's head," a reference to ammunition developed in Belgium for NATO rifles. He then added, "That would be me. I will do that." "And who are you?" the host asked. He allegedly answered, "My name is JJ…that's my name. JJ…that's my real name. What else do you want me to say?" Later on, the defendant allegedly launched into an increasingly detailed explanation of how he might assassinate the president. Keep this nigga in jail.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

80,057 views • 4 months ago