Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Explore Argo, our cost-effective cargo capsule with end-to-end service for €150M/launch for 4,000kg up-and-down mass & 15.5m³ pressurized cargo volume. Developed with Space Cargo Unlimited & ATMOS Space Cargo, Argo is our commitment to rebuilding independent European space cargo capabilities.

30,206 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Mack Crawford's profile picture
Mack Crawford2 years ago

@Cosmic_Penguin @SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo That is a very big decelerator! Is it going to be able to land without needing parachutes? Reminds me of ROOST, which would just gradually float down under the buoyancy of its own heat shield

🚀JM✨'s profile picture
🚀JM✨2 years ago

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo Let's go RFA 💙

Weltraum-Nerd's profile picture
Weltraum-Nerd2 years ago

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo The LEGO version of Argo is ready for take off.

Aedendal - Homme sans humour's profile picture
Aedendal - Homme sans humour2 years ago

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo Hey Guys! just a question, why docking on a PMA instead of a CBM for cargo ? will it not constrain the size of the cargo packagesthat can enter/exit the ISS ?

Boca Bingo's profile picture
Boca Bingo2 years ago

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo I call dibs on the first seat :) Even if it's not meant for humans :D

James's profile picture
James2 years ago

@13ericralph31 @SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo I’m wondering who the customer is? 🧐

Iron Hide Videos's profile picture
Iron Hide Videos2 years ago

@TJ_Cooney @SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo WOW! This is awesome!

Robert Clark's profile picture
Robert Clark2 years ago

.@BellikOzan @AndrewParsonson Advise RFA consider just giving their capsule a minimal side taper angle a la the Soyuz capsule, rather than using a straight cylinder, to be able to use a traditional heat shield instead of their inflatable heat shield of high technical risk. Minimal volume lost while using a heat shield with decades of operational usage.

Related Videos