正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Explore Argo, our cost-effective cargo capsule with end-to-end service for €150M/launch for 4,000kg up-and-down mass & 15.5m³ pressurized cargo volume. Developed with Space Cargo Unlimited & ATMOS Space Cargo, Argo is our commitment to rebuilding independent European space cargo capabilities.

30,206 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

Mack Crawford 的头像
Mack Crawford2 年前

@Cosmic_Penguin @SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo That is a very big decelerator! Is it going to be able to land without needing parachutes? Reminds me of ROOST, which would just gradually float down under the buoyancy of its own heat shield

🚀JM✨ 的头像
🚀JM✨2 年前

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo Let's go RFA 💙

Weltraum-Nerd 的头像
Weltraum-Nerd2 年前

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo The LEGO version of Argo is ready for take off.

Aedendal - Homme sans humour 的头像
Aedendal - Homme sans humour2 年前

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo Hey Guys! just a question, why docking on a PMA instead of a CBM for cargo ? will it not constrain the size of the cargo packagesthat can enter/exit the ISS ?

Boca Bingo 的头像
Boca Bingo2 年前

@SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo I call dibs on the first seat :) Even if it's not meant for humans :D

James 的头像
James2 年前

@13ericralph31 @SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo I’m wondering who the customer is? 🧐

Iron Hide Videos 的头像
Iron Hide Videos2 年前

@TJ_Cooney @SpaceCu @AtmosSpaceCargo WOW! This is awesome!

Robert Clark 的头像
Robert Clark2 年前

.@BellikOzan @AndrewParsonson Advise RFA consider just giving their capsule a minimal side taper angle a la the Soyuz capsule, rather than using a straight cylinder, to be able to use a traditional heat shield instead of their inflatable heat shield of high technical risk. Minimal volume lost while using a heat shield with decades of operational usage.

相关视频