Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Explosive TV as Nolan challenges "male people represent a very significant threat to female people" - Fiona McAnena Director of Campaigns at Sex Matters Sex Matters | #NolanLIVE | BBC iPlayer

540,907 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Ulrike Bullerby's profile picture
Ulrike Bullerby2 years ago

So how many times have you been victimised by women? How many times have you been terrified by the presence of a female stranger? Women live with that fear all the time. We take many many precautions to not fall prey to male strangers and yet virtually every single one of us has been a victim of male violence or male sexual violence in one form or another.

CeeBee's profile picture
CeeBee2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer Idea for a TV show that Nolan should go on. I'm outraged and disgusted by Nolan's complete dismissal of the known risks to women & deliberate misrepresentation of what McAnena was saying. Complaint will be made. To dispute facts about risks to women is blatant misogyny by BBC.

Kellie-Jay Keen's profile picture
Kellie-Jay Keen2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer Men …. In the name of all that’s holy, they’re called men. Please please please have a guest on who speaks the truth rather than this nonsensical cowardly language. Male people is mental.

Gareth Roberts's profile picture
Gareth Roberts2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer This is the daftest thing. *Of course* a significant minority of men are a threat. Spluttering about it doesn’t change the simple fact.

Jo Bartosch's profile picture
Jo Bartosch2 years ago

@zeno001 @SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer She’s right. We all know it. It might not be a majority of men, but I think anyone who saw that will know exactly which category of men you belong in.

For Women Scotland's profile picture
For Women Scotland2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer You embarrassed yourself.

Sarah sticking with the truth's profile picture
Sarah sticking with the truth2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer Why are you ignoring reality, Stephen?

Sara's profile picture
Sara2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer You spoke to @DerryBanShee with contempt. Surely you are better briefed than this considering your Stonewall podcast. If not, you need to reconsider your producers. Absolutely shameful @StephenNolan

Jean Hatchet's profile picture
Jean Hatchet2 years ago

@SexMattersOrg @BBCiPlayer This you bro…?

Related Videos

"Tristan identifies as a trans woman. Her preferred pronouns are she/her." These are the words of BBC Radio Ulster presenter Chris Buckler during today's interview with Fiona McAnena from Sex Matters. About a male guest. They were discussing his recent interview with Tristan Morrow - a young man who left the Orange Order and now identifies as a trans woman. SEEN in Journalism criticised that interview for: - Inaccuracy: using female pronouns for a man - Failing to challenge contested ideological claims - Not mentioning women once - despite covering disputes over women's sex-based spaces We've now had the chance to listen back to today's interview with Fiona (McAnena). While it was encouraging to hear a gender-critical woman given similar airtime, the two interviews could hardly have been more different. Morrow was largely allowed to tell his personal story uninterrupted and with relatively little challenge. McAnena faced repeated interruptions and hostile questioning, much of it relating to the recent controversy over the cancellation of a Women's Rights Network event at the Belfast arts festival Féile an Phobail. Among the questions Buckler put to her - some more than once - were: - Do you accept that people born male should be allowed to live as women? - Do you object to referring to Tristan Morrow as "she"? - How does using female pronouns for trans women impact your rights? - Do you believe trans people have a right to exist? - Do you accept there are adults who feel they are in the wrong body? - Would you welcome a trans person to your event ? McAnena did an admirable job of steering the conversation back to women's rights. Buckler repeatedly returned it to transgender identity. Buckler also made several references to SEEN in Journalism's criticism of his interview with Morrow, but appeared to misunderstand the substance of our argument. We did not say he should have included a female voice to "push back" on Morrow. We said he never mentioned women or women's rights once during a 21-minute interview about a dispute rooted in women's sex-based spaces. That is a different point entirely. We also raised concerns about inaccurate language - using female pronouns to describe a male guest. Rather than engaging with those concerns, Buckler appeared to double down - at one point, appearing to rebuke McAnena for referring to Morrow as "he". But our criticism wasn't about politeness. It was about accuracy. A principle the BBC should hold in the highest regard. At one point, Buckler said he wasn't speaking from either side. Yet across these two interviews, listeners learnt far more about identifying as trans than they did about why women defend sex-based rights. Good journalism should help audiences understand competing perspectives, not steer them towards one.

SEEN in Journalism

76,625 views • 2 days ago