正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 EXPOSED! FCRA Amendment hits. — One lady. One foundation. Multiple protests within 72 Hours🤯 Govt announces Doon-Rishikesh road expansion. Manavi Anusha of "Aumana Foundation" begins IG campaign. Shaves her head BALD on camera, floods Instagram with CRYING reels, emotional blackmail galore → project STOPS 🤯 48 hours later?...

Indian_Analyzer's profile picture

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

145,490 subscribers

159,932 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is the Bhaniyawala–Rishikesh road. Steep turns. Dangerous stretch. A four-lane highway was planned. 3,600 trees to be cut. In return, 40 hectares allotted for planting 40,000 saplings. Then the Galibaz lady from Aumana Foundation arrived. She started a protest. Project cancelled. Women and daughters of this region travel this road every day. Their safety was never her concern. Twenty-four hours later, the same lady was in Delhi’s CJP protesy, hurling filthy mother-sister ABUSES at policemen, calling them “ANGUTHA CHHAP”, & shoving her head for the cameras. When accidents and traffic chaos continue on this road, she will be nowhere. Interestingly, all this drama began right after FCRA norms were set to be tightened. One NGO activist terminated an entire region’s infrastructure progress. Some Gen-Z influencers clapped for her on Instagram. She will keep minting money in the name of “environment”. The people of Uttarakhand will keep paying the price.
2:40

This is the Bhaniyawala–Rishikesh road. Steep turns. Dangerous stretch. A four-lane highway was planned. 3,600 trees to be cut. In return, 40 hectares allotted for planting 40,000 saplings. Then the Galibaz lady from Aumana Foundation arrived. She started a protest. Project cancelled. Women and daughters of this region travel this road every day. Their safety was never her concern. Twenty-four hours later, the same lady was in Delhi’s CJP protesy, hurling filthy mother-sister ABUSES at policemen, calling them “ANGUTHA CHHAP”, & shoving her head for the cameras. When accidents and traffic chaos continue on this road, she will be nowhere. Interestingly, all this drama began right after FCRA norms were set to be tightened. One NGO activist terminated an entire region’s infrastructure progress. Some Gen-Z influencers clapped for her on Instagram. She will keep minting money in the name of “environment”. The people of Uttarakhand will keep paying the price.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

135,243 次观看 • 17 天前

The alleged rape and murder of a three-year-old girl near Nasrapur in Bhor taluka on Friday afternoon triggered widespread outrage and protests across the district, leading to several road blockades, which continued late into Saturday evening. The accused, identified as Bhimrao Kamble, a 65-year-old farm labourer and resident of a neighbouring village, was apprehended by a police team following a review of CCTV footage from the area. Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on Saturday said the state govt would move for a fast-track court trial and seek death penalty for the accused. Superintendent of police (Pune Rural) Sandeep Singh Gill said the girl was lured away around 3.30 pm on Friday while she was playing alone outside her house. Her family, who are farmers, reported her missing around 5.30 pm. "Our teams immediately began reviewing CCTV footage and gathering local intelligence. One camera captured Kamble taking the child away," Gill said. "Upon being tracked down, the suspect led us to a tin shed used for cattle, located approximately 700 metres from the girl's home. We recovered the child and rushed her to a hospital, where she was declared dead." Preliminary investigations suggest the child was raped and then gagged with a piece of cloth, leading to her death. "We also found head injuries on her. A special team of four officers has been formed, and a chargesheet will be filed expeditiously," Gill added. Police revealed that the accused has a history of sexual offences. "Kamble was first booked for molestation in 1998 but was later acquitted. A second case was registered against him in 2015 involving a minor relative, but the complaint was subsequently withdrawn. We will be reviewing both these past cases," Gill said. On Friday evening, angry villagers staged a road blockade, demanding justice for the victim. They also blocked the Pune-Bengaluru highway for over an hour on Friday night. On Saturday afternoon, residents took out a silent march to condemn the incident. Protests were also held on the Katraj-Dehu Road bypass and Sinhagad Road, severely disrupting traffic. The State Reserve Police Force (SRPF) and additional local units have been deployed in Nasrapur and surrounding areas to maintain order. Around 5pm on Saturday, the girl's body was brought to Sassoon General Hospital for a post-mortem, after which it was handed over to her relatives. "Samples of her internal organs have been collected for analysis and will be sent to a forensic laboratory for examination," the hospital's medical superintendent, Dr Yallappa Jadhav, said. Following the post-mortem, as the ambulance carrying the girl's body was heading to Bhor taluka for her final rites, it was stopped around 6 pm at Wadgaon Bridge by protesters demanding stern action against the suspect. This caused vehicular movement towards both Mumbai and Satara to come to a standstill for approximately four-and-a-half hours. Around 10.30 p.m, police used mild force to clear the traffic on the Katraj-Dehu Road bypass. "Vehicular movement was restored by 11 pm," Pune police commissioner Amitesh Kumar said. "We initially counselled the family members and relatives before clearing the road," he added.
1:25

The alleged rape and murder of a three-year-old girl near Nasrapur in Bhor taluka on Friday afternoon triggered widespread outrage and protests across the district, leading to several road blockades, which continued late into Saturday evening. The accused, identified as Bhimrao Kamble, a 65-year-old farm labourer and resident of a neighbouring village, was apprehended by a police team following a review of CCTV footage from the area. Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on Saturday said the state govt would move for a fast-track court trial and seek death penalty for the accused. Superintendent of police (Pune Rural) Sandeep Singh Gill said the girl was lured away around 3.30 pm on Friday while she was playing alone outside her house. Her family, who are farmers, reported her missing around 5.30 pm. "Our teams immediately began reviewing CCTV footage and gathering local intelligence. One camera captured Kamble taking the child away," Gill said. "Upon being tracked down, the suspect led us to a tin shed used for cattle, located approximately 700 metres from the girl's home. We recovered the child and rushed her to a hospital, where she was declared dead." Preliminary investigations suggest the child was raped and then gagged with a piece of cloth, leading to her death. "We also found head injuries on her. A special team of four officers has been formed, and a chargesheet will be filed expeditiously," Gill added. Police revealed that the accused has a history of sexual offences. "Kamble was first booked for molestation in 1998 but was later acquitted. A second case was registered against him in 2015 involving a minor relative, but the complaint was subsequently withdrawn. We will be reviewing both these past cases," Gill said. On Friday evening, angry villagers staged a road blockade, demanding justice for the victim. They also blocked the Pune-Bengaluru highway for over an hour on Friday night. On Saturday afternoon, residents took out a silent march to condemn the incident. Protests were also held on the Katraj-Dehu Road bypass and Sinhagad Road, severely disrupting traffic. The State Reserve Police Force (SRPF) and additional local units have been deployed in Nasrapur and surrounding areas to maintain order. Around 5pm on Saturday, the girl's body was brought to Sassoon General Hospital for a post-mortem, after which it was handed over to her relatives. "Samples of her internal organs have been collected for analysis and will be sent to a forensic laboratory for examination," the hospital's medical superintendent, Dr Yallappa Jadhav, said. Following the post-mortem, as the ambulance carrying the girl's body was heading to Bhor taluka for her final rites, it was stopped around 6 pm at Wadgaon Bridge by protesters demanding stern action against the suspect. This caused vehicular movement towards both Mumbai and Satara to come to a standstill for approximately four-and-a-half hours. Around 10.30 p.m, police used mild force to clear the traffic on the Katraj-Dehu Road bypass. "Vehicular movement was restored by 11 pm," Pune police commissioner Amitesh Kumar said. "We initially counselled the family members and relatives before clearing the road," he added.

Hate Detector 🔍

18,122 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨THREE days before executing Alex Pretti, the SAME agents almost killed another U.S. citizen…🚨 While illegally detaining unaccompanied minors, using excessive force, causing multiple car accidents, and assaulting multiple U.S. citizens… all in one video. The video starts with agents checking the ID of a 16-year-old girl they had just hit with their car. She has a U.S. passport. They don’t care. They had already taken her 15-year-old brother after scanning his face. They seize her passport, and then handcuff her. At the front of the car, you can see a U.S. citizen legally observing. Not interfering, or moving. Just filming. Suddenly, agents swarm them and tackle them to the ground. Multiple men put their full body weight on the person’s back. One agent hits them in the face, and then pushes his knee into their face, while another pulls the person’s hair… All while the person lays motionless. Their nose starts bleeding into the snow. They’re struggling to talk, let alone breathe. All while they are not resisting. When the agents finally lift them up, blood is running down their face. And the agent’s rampage continues. Agents are then seen smashing a car window and try to grab the driver while the car is not in park, nearly running over another agent in the process. Multiple people are now on the ground. One man has been pepper sprayed, his glasses knocked off. A woman walks up. Without warning, an agent pepper sprays her directly in the eyes, blinding her, while they yell at her to move. She can’t see where she’s going, so the person filming has to lead her to the sidewalk. The camera turns back. The man who was pepper sprayed earlier is now standing, lethargic, disoriented, and unable to see without his glasses, and with pepper spray in his eyes. They slam him back to the ground. An agent walks over, pepper sprays him again, inches from his eyes, and casually walks away. This is believed to be the same agent who later shot Alex Pretti in the back. As three agents put their full weight on this man, other agents begin throwing tear gas, including a canister thrown right next to his head. The entire area fills with thick smoke. You can hear agents accidentally hitting a car because they can’t see. After multiple pepper sprayings, physical assault, and tear gas deployment right next to his face, the agents simply stand up and walk away. They leave him lying in the middle of the street, surrounded by smoke, without glasses, effectively blinded, after already causing crashes due to lack of visibility. Eventually, he manages to get up and run for help, begging bystanders to assist him. And these are the same agents who later illegally assaulted women for filming, then assaulted Alex Pretti for helping them, using excessive force, pepper spray, and bear spray… Before tackling Alex Pretti, beating him, removing his legal firearm… and executing him. This is what happens when agents are trained to ignore the Constitution, are protected from consequences, and told that violence is policy. If this blatant abuse is allowed to continue, it’s no longer a question of if another U.S. citizen will die… It’s only a question of when, and how many more they think they can get away with before anyone stops them.
4:32

🚨THREE days before executing Alex Pretti, the SAME agents almost killed another U.S. citizen…🚨 While illegally detaining unaccompanied minors, using excessive force, causing multiple car accidents, and assaulting multiple U.S. citizens… all in one video. The video starts with agents checking the ID of a 16-year-old girl they had just hit with their car. She has a U.S. passport. They don’t care. They had already taken her 15-year-old brother after scanning his face. They seize her passport, and then handcuff her. At the front of the car, you can see a U.S. citizen legally observing. Not interfering, or moving. Just filming. Suddenly, agents swarm them and tackle them to the ground. Multiple men put their full body weight on the person’s back. One agent hits them in the face, and then pushes his knee into their face, while another pulls the person’s hair… All while the person lays motionless. Their nose starts bleeding into the snow. They’re struggling to talk, let alone breathe. All while they are not resisting. When the agents finally lift them up, blood is running down their face. And the agent’s rampage continues. Agents are then seen smashing a car window and try to grab the driver while the car is not in park, nearly running over another agent in the process. Multiple people are now on the ground. One man has been pepper sprayed, his glasses knocked off. A woman walks up. Without warning, an agent pepper sprays her directly in the eyes, blinding her, while they yell at her to move. She can’t see where she’s going, so the person filming has to lead her to the sidewalk. The camera turns back. The man who was pepper sprayed earlier is now standing, lethargic, disoriented, and unable to see without his glasses, and with pepper spray in his eyes. They slam him back to the ground. An agent walks over, pepper sprays him again, inches from his eyes, and casually walks away. This is believed to be the same agent who later shot Alex Pretti in the back. As three agents put their full weight on this man, other agents begin throwing tear gas, including a canister thrown right next to his head. The entire area fills with thick smoke. You can hear agents accidentally hitting a car because they can’t see. After multiple pepper sprayings, physical assault, and tear gas deployment right next to his face, the agents simply stand up and walk away. They leave him lying in the middle of the street, surrounded by smoke, without glasses, effectively blinded, after already causing crashes due to lack of visibility. Eventually, he manages to get up and run for help, begging bystanders to assist him. And these are the same agents who later illegally assaulted women for filming, then assaulted Alex Pretti for helping them, using excessive force, pepper spray, and bear spray… Before tackling Alex Pretti, beating him, removing his legal firearm… and executing him. This is what happens when agents are trained to ignore the Constitution, are protected from consequences, and told that violence is policy. If this blatant abuse is allowed to continue, it’s no longer a question of if another U.S. citizen will die… It’s only a question of when, and how many more they think they can get away with before anyone stops them.

Jesus Freakin Congress

619,098 次观看 • 6 个月前

The Dark Money Funding America's Chaos with Soros, Rockefeller, Obama, Clintons, USAID, SPLC, & Other Corrupt NGOs Behind it All Federal Reserve Financial Accounts say NGOs held a total of over $14.12 TRILLION in assets in 2025. $3+ billion combined annual revenues of around 500 left-wing activist groups, including socialist communist organizations coordinating major protests like the No Kings and other protests per year. Around $1.5+ billion annual revenue and spending by Arabella Advisors dark-money network, progressive advocacy, protests, activism per year. Hundreds of millions in cumulative grants from George Soros/Open Society Foundations and Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss to dozens of U.S. protest-linked groups, $293M+ from Wyss, $72M+ from Soros to No Kings-related orgs, multi-year but ongoing annual flow amounts. On top of all of this one of the most concerning aspects is the amount of money dumped into swaying and fixing elections from these same billionaires and NGOs. This alone is a MAJOR part of these regime change operations being conducted on U.S. soil and around the globe. The "follow the money" trail leads straight to the usual suspects... globalist billionaires and their corrupt NGO empire. This isn't isolated to campus protests. It's a global operation of radical-left violence and societal breakdown that runs real operations and agendas to destroy America and any conservative movement globally. Violence mixed with propaganda and psychological operations are being funded by YOUR own taxpayer dollars for your own demise. Domestic Extremists/Civil Unrest Advocates: $61M Arabella: $7,821,930 Buffett: $ 8,557,500 Ford: $10,110,825 Rockefeller: $9,819,959 Singham: $610,000 Soros: $5,755,308 Tides: $18,765,690 Pro-Hamas/ Radical Islam: $98M Arabella: $3,253,604 Buffett: $12,025,074 Ford: $30,757,185 Foreign Influence: $87,040 Rockefeller: $6,535,906 Soros: $33,307,474 Tides: $12,300,750 USAID supported independent media in over 30 countries, but the full harm to global media is hard to assess since organizations hesitate to speak out, fearing loss of funding or political attacks. Per a now-offline 2023 fact sheet, it aided 6,200 journalists, 707 non-state outlets, and 279 media CSOs. The 2025 budget allocates $268,376,000 for independent media and free information flow. George Soros and his Open Society Foundations have poured hundreds of millions more through dark money pipelines into groups like the Open Society, Tides, Indivisible, Jewish Voice for Peace, US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, and Education for Just Peace in the Middle East. These aren't "peaceful protesters," they're paid organizers turning student activism into organized disruption, property damage, and chaos. Soros has admitted he wants to "remake" societies... and America's streets are his latest lab experiment. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is right there with him, dumping over half a million into the same networks fueling these anti-Israel radicals. Old money meets new radicalism, funding the very groups turning college quads into battlegrounds. Obama and the Clintons built the machine and structured the government side of the operations to funnel taxpayer dollars through corrupt NGOs that then get distributed to hundreds of smaller NGOs. Their foundations, allies, and post-White House networks overlap with these funders. Obama-era policies and Clinton-linked orgs funneled influence through the same progressive infrastructure that's now weaponized for division. John Podesta was in charge of a $375 BILLION dollar slush fund for "climate cause" which was distributed to NGOs founded only months earlier. Where was the money really going? Funding the destruction of America itself. USAID, your tax dollars at work, has been exposed routing money to Soros-connected NGOs abroad and at home, propping up "democracy" initiatives that look suspiciously like color revolutions and street chaos in the U.S. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and other "charitable" NGOs act as the smear-and-fund machine: labeling conservatives "hate groups" while raking in millions to fuel the very radical activism causing riots, looting, and political violence from BLM 2020 to today's pro-Hamas encampments. This is not organic outrage. It's astroturfed anarchy, funded by billionaires who profit from division, NGOs that launder influence, and politicians who look the other way. From U.S. cities in flames to destabilized nations worldwide, the pattern is crystal clear. Flood the zone with cash, incite the mob, erode Western civilization, and consolidate power.
21:00

The Dark Money Funding America's Chaos with Soros, Rockefeller, Obama, Clintons, USAID, SPLC, & Other Corrupt NGOs Behind it All Federal Reserve Financial Accounts say NGOs held a total of over $14.12 TRILLION in assets in 2025. $3+ billion combined annual revenues of around 500 left-wing activist groups, including socialist communist organizations coordinating major protests like the No Kings and other protests per year. Around $1.5+ billion annual revenue and spending by Arabella Advisors dark-money network, progressive advocacy, protests, activism per year. Hundreds of millions in cumulative grants from George Soros/Open Society Foundations and Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss to dozens of U.S. protest-linked groups, $293M+ from Wyss, $72M+ from Soros to No Kings-related orgs, multi-year but ongoing annual flow amounts. On top of all of this one of the most concerning aspects is the amount of money dumped into swaying and fixing elections from these same billionaires and NGOs. This alone is a MAJOR part of these regime change operations being conducted on U.S. soil and around the globe. The "follow the money" trail leads straight to the usual suspects... globalist billionaires and their corrupt NGO empire. This isn't isolated to campus protests. It's a global operation of radical-left violence and societal breakdown that runs real operations and agendas to destroy America and any conservative movement globally. Violence mixed with propaganda and psychological operations are being funded by YOUR own taxpayer dollars for your own demise. Domestic Extremists/Civil Unrest Advocates: $61M Arabella: $7,821,930 Buffett: $ 8,557,500 Ford: $10,110,825 Rockefeller: $9,819,959 Singham: $610,000 Soros: $5,755,308 Tides: $18,765,690 Pro-Hamas/ Radical Islam: $98M Arabella: $3,253,604 Buffett: $12,025,074 Ford: $30,757,185 Foreign Influence: $87,040 Rockefeller: $6,535,906 Soros: $33,307,474 Tides: $12,300,750 USAID supported independent media in over 30 countries, but the full harm to global media is hard to assess since organizations hesitate to speak out, fearing loss of funding or political attacks. Per a now-offline 2023 fact sheet, it aided 6,200 journalists, 707 non-state outlets, and 279 media CSOs. The 2025 budget allocates $268,376,000 for independent media and free information flow. George Soros and his Open Society Foundations have poured hundreds of millions more through dark money pipelines into groups like the Open Society, Tides, Indivisible, Jewish Voice for Peace, US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, and Education for Just Peace in the Middle East. These aren't "peaceful protesters," they're paid organizers turning student activism into organized disruption, property damage, and chaos. Soros has admitted he wants to "remake" societies... and America's streets are his latest lab experiment. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is right there with him, dumping over half a million into the same networks fueling these anti-Israel radicals. Old money meets new radicalism, funding the very groups turning college quads into battlegrounds. Obama and the Clintons built the machine and structured the government side of the operations to funnel taxpayer dollars through corrupt NGOs that then get distributed to hundreds of smaller NGOs. Their foundations, allies, and post-White House networks overlap with these funders. Obama-era policies and Clinton-linked orgs funneled influence through the same progressive infrastructure that's now weaponized for division. John Podesta was in charge of a $375 BILLION dollar slush fund for "climate cause" which was distributed to NGOs founded only months earlier. Where was the money really going? Funding the destruction of America itself. USAID, your tax dollars at work, has been exposed routing money to Soros-connected NGOs abroad and at home, propping up "democracy" initiatives that look suspiciously like color revolutions and street chaos in the U.S. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and other "charitable" NGOs act as the smear-and-fund machine: labeling conservatives "hate groups" while raking in millions to fuel the very radical activism causing riots, looting, and political violence from BLM 2020 to today's pro-Hamas encampments. This is not organic outrage. It's astroturfed anarchy, funded by billionaires who profit from division, NGOs that launder influence, and politicians who look the other way. From U.S. cities in flames to destabilized nations worldwide, the pattern is crystal clear. Flood the zone with cash, incite the mob, erode Western civilization, and consolidate power.

The SCIF

54,610 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Project Constitution Made A Mistake By Falling For A Classic Israeli Hasbara Tactic ... It is NOT Erika Kirk on those recordings. The story was PLANTED with Project Constitution from a shady account. How do I know? Because they targeted me too!! Our names on X are being searched in Israel because they are targeting their Hasbara campaigns and operations at our accounts to ruin our credibility. Benjamin Netanyahu said that this would happen. Did everyone think that he was joking? I am not new to this space. Those low level operations will NOT work with me. Israel better do some way better research before coming at me with that week NONSENSE!! I WILL EXPOSE IT ALL EVERY SINGLE TIME!! EVERY SINGLE TIME!! "How do you know that Project Constitution got it wrong tho?!" I'm glad you asked... Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 also did an EXCELLENT job of covering this "Erika Kirk on the Epstein Voice Recording" story that was SEEDED to us independent journalist. He doesn't know that the story was planted through Project Constitution, but he does know it's NOT Erika Kirk; and more likely Haley Robson. I shared his post to my page. Excellent work. But Gary and his Hasbara Buddies want you to believe that Candace Owens is CONSPIRING with Project Constitution to bring physical "harm" to Erika Kirk. Yep! You read that correctly! He is even invoking, without any truthful context, that Candace Owens and Project Constitution want to take the life of EK. 🤯🤦🏾‍♂️ Nothing on the face of this earth could be further from the truth. Project Constitution made a mistake and accepted the poisoned apple... I am about to do a video to prove that to you... So make sure you get this out there and then check back with me later for that update... But until then, listen to THIS clip from my Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 PART V video. Gary and his Hasbara Buddies know that the veil is falling. While everyone was looking at Candace Owens, I just "quietly" connected all of the dots and just dropped the biggest bombshell article to the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. It is over with for Israel. It is over with for the men, we call leaders, who Israel has corrupted. The Israeli Honeypot network has been exposed in PART V of my Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 series. Erika Kirk is a part of that Israeli Honeypot network. I have been covering this for months! That part can be found in PART IV of my series. I even uncovered how they move the money legally, but they messed up one time... They messed up the same year that Erika Kirk was getting her real estate license in New York. The Israeli killer drone company at the center of the Charlie Kirk investigation, Elbit, was caught funneling money to a Romanian real estate project and its US-based "consultants"... Literally, what are the odds of that? What are the odds that this ISRAELI killer drone/tech company who receives BILLIONS from the US taxpayers, are also invested in Romanian real estate using American consultants, the same EXACT year that Erika Kirk was in New York getting her real estate license? IT'S INFORMATION LIKE THAT THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW... Israel has set up legal frameworks to "hide" within our systems; ultimately to SUBVERT us of our country.. Erika Kirk is a massive figure to both Israel and the United States. She represents decades of planning. She is not an anomaly. She is a PLANT. And these online personalities acting like they are defending Erika Kirk out of the goodness of their hearts are not honest actors. They are friends and simps of Erika Kirk who is now worth a quarter of a billion dollars... She makes money with the Trump's son Donald Trump Jr., jokes about forming the Arizonan Israeli Public Action Committee (AIPAC) with Tyler Bowyer (TPUSA) and Benjamin Netanyahu's son, leads the #1 political machine in the country(TPUSA), & was just appointed to the USAF BoV. Wake Up!! Israel is using SUBVERSION to infiltrate the US... Watch This... 👇🏾
3:05

🚨 Project Constitution Made A Mistake By Falling For A Classic Israeli Hasbara Tactic ... It is NOT Erika Kirk on those recordings. The story was PLANTED with Project Constitution from a shady account. How do I know? Because they targeted me too!! Our names on X are being searched in Israel because they are targeting their Hasbara campaigns and operations at our accounts to ruin our credibility. Benjamin Netanyahu said that this would happen. Did everyone think that he was joking? I am not new to this space. Those low level operations will NOT work with me. Israel better do some way better research before coming at me with that week NONSENSE!! I WILL EXPOSE IT ALL EVERY SINGLE TIME!! EVERY SINGLE TIME!! "How do you know that Project Constitution got it wrong tho?!" I'm glad you asked... Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 also did an EXCELLENT job of covering this "Erika Kirk on the Epstein Voice Recording" story that was SEEDED to us independent journalist. He doesn't know that the story was planted through Project Constitution, but he does know it's NOT Erika Kirk; and more likely Haley Robson. I shared his post to my page. Excellent work. But Gary and his Hasbara Buddies want you to believe that Candace Owens is CONSPIRING with Project Constitution to bring physical "harm" to Erika Kirk. Yep! You read that correctly! He is even invoking, without any truthful context, that Candace Owens and Project Constitution want to take the life of EK. 🤯🤦🏾‍♂️ Nothing on the face of this earth could be further from the truth. Project Constitution made a mistake and accepted the poisoned apple... I am about to do a video to prove that to you... So make sure you get this out there and then check back with me later for that update... But until then, listen to THIS clip from my Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 PART V video. Gary and his Hasbara Buddies know that the veil is falling. While everyone was looking at Candace Owens, I just "quietly" connected all of the dots and just dropped the biggest bombshell article to the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. It is over with for Israel. It is over with for the men, we call leaders, who Israel has corrupted. The Israeli Honeypot network has been exposed in PART V of my Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 series. Erika Kirk is a part of that Israeli Honeypot network. I have been covering this for months! That part can be found in PART IV of my series. I even uncovered how they move the money legally, but they messed up one time... They messed up the same year that Erika Kirk was getting her real estate license in New York. The Israeli killer drone company at the center of the Charlie Kirk investigation, Elbit, was caught funneling money to a Romanian real estate project and its US-based "consultants"... Literally, what are the odds of that? What are the odds that this ISRAELI killer drone/tech company who receives BILLIONS from the US taxpayers, are also invested in Romanian real estate using American consultants, the same EXACT year that Erika Kirk was in New York getting her real estate license? IT'S INFORMATION LIKE THAT THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW... Israel has set up legal frameworks to "hide" within our systems; ultimately to SUBVERT us of our country.. Erika Kirk is a massive figure to both Israel and the United States. She represents decades of planning. She is not an anomaly. She is a PLANT. And these online personalities acting like they are defending Erika Kirk out of the goodness of their hearts are not honest actors. They are friends and simps of Erika Kirk who is now worth a quarter of a billion dollars... She makes money with the Trump's son Donald Trump Jr., jokes about forming the Arizonan Israeli Public Action Committee (AIPAC) with Tyler Bowyer (TPUSA) and Benjamin Netanyahu's son, leads the #1 political machine in the country(TPUSA), & was just appointed to the USAF BoV. Wake Up!! Israel is using SUBVERSION to infiltrate the US... Watch This... 👇🏾

WeAreNotGoingToMars

58,655 次观看 • 5 个月前

My partner and I got attacked at Download Festival on Sunday. We just stopped to watch a band and a women sat about 10 feet behind us in a chair marched up behind us and shouted 'f*cking get out of my way'. We told her it's a festival, we can stand where we like and you can stand up if you want to see the band. chill out! A young women next to me said she had said the same to her. The woman then continued a tirade of verbal abuse which included, you are a pair of 'big c*ocks', and 'I am going to hit you'. She then ran up behind me, ripped my hat off my head which pulled my neck back and then threw my hat into the crowd. Her male friend then punched my partner in the face. When I turned I pushed her away from me, she then grabbed my hair and kept pulling it until I was on the ground she then repeatedly kicked me in the head, face and body with her heavy boots . Luckily some wonderful bystanders pulled her away from me, as she was much bigger than me, both in height and width. We went to the security and police and they said because I pushed her I would be offered a Community Resolution, which I refused to accept. They also said we might be evicted from the festival. We were not treated as victims of assault we were treated as trouble makers. The police failed to take a full statement from us and the Download security didn't even bother talking to us, just the people that attacked us. These terrible people weren't arrested or evicted from the festival, they were allowed to stay and to potentially go on to verbally abuse and attack other innocent people. I complained to the police and did another statement yesterday. The man taking the statement was shocked as it did not come across as we were victims at all in the statement taken at the festival. It's shocking that a police office saw the video of me on the floor being repeatedly kicked in the head and face and failed to report it correctly, identify us a victims of assault and evict or arrest our attackers. I am a 55 year old woman with epilepsy, I don't drink or take drugs, my parter is 53 and didn't drink as he was driving. I was looking forward to Download as a distraction as my Mum has just been killed by medical negligence and I have been spending my time dealing with the coroners and all that goes with it. It's been the worst time of my life and this experience has just sent me over the edge. Shame on the police for victim blaming and failing to protect the public from dangerous people. As for the person at Download security you should be ashamed of yourself, believing them over us and not bothering to collect evidence from both sides. I have attached a video of me being attacked and some photos of the aggressive woman. In one of the photos you can see her being held back, so she would have happily gone back in to attack me again. I had to go home as I didn't feel safe staying, as they were still at the festival, plus I wasn't in any fit state to stay. I currently can't work as my chest has been stamped on and i'm struggling to move and breath properly. Eating is fun as the right side of my face and teeth are really uncomfortable and my lip is cut. My vision has also been intermittently blurry and I have felt dizzy. I work for myself, so getting paid time off isn't an option. We did get some witnesses but if you or anyone you know saw this women attacking or verbally abusing anyone please let me know. Let's get the face of the women who thinks it's ok to stamp on someones face and head at Download Festival known. People like this should be banned from any festival for life. A big thanks to all the wonderful people who helped me. Download is a great festival, it's such a shame people like this spoil it for others.
0:24

My partner and I got attacked at Download Festival on Sunday. We just stopped to watch a band and a women sat about 10 feet behind us in a chair marched up behind us and shouted 'f*cking get out of my way'. We told her it's a festival, we can stand where we like and you can stand up if you want to see the band. chill out! A young women next to me said she had said the same to her. The woman then continued a tirade of verbal abuse which included, you are a pair of 'big c*ocks', and 'I am going to hit you'. She then ran up behind me, ripped my hat off my head which pulled my neck back and then threw my hat into the crowd. Her male friend then punched my partner in the face. When I turned I pushed her away from me, she then grabbed my hair and kept pulling it until I was on the ground she then repeatedly kicked me in the head, face and body with her heavy boots . Luckily some wonderful bystanders pulled her away from me, as she was much bigger than me, both in height and width. We went to the security and police and they said because I pushed her I would be offered a Community Resolution, which I refused to accept. They also said we might be evicted from the festival. We were not treated as victims of assault we were treated as trouble makers. The police failed to take a full statement from us and the Download security didn't even bother talking to us, just the people that attacked us. These terrible people weren't arrested or evicted from the festival, they were allowed to stay and to potentially go on to verbally abuse and attack other innocent people. I complained to the police and did another statement yesterday. The man taking the statement was shocked as it did not come across as we were victims at all in the statement taken at the festival. It's shocking that a police office saw the video of me on the floor being repeatedly kicked in the head and face and failed to report it correctly, identify us a victims of assault and evict or arrest our attackers. I am a 55 year old woman with epilepsy, I don't drink or take drugs, my parter is 53 and didn't drink as he was driving. I was looking forward to Download as a distraction as my Mum has just been killed by medical negligence and I have been spending my time dealing with the coroners and all that goes with it. It's been the worst time of my life and this experience has just sent me over the edge. Shame on the police for victim blaming and failing to protect the public from dangerous people. As for the person at Download security you should be ashamed of yourself, believing them over us and not bothering to collect evidence from both sides. I have attached a video of me being attacked and some photos of the aggressive woman. In one of the photos you can see her being held back, so she would have happily gone back in to attack me again. I had to go home as I didn't feel safe staying, as they were still at the festival, plus I wasn't in any fit state to stay. I currently can't work as my chest has been stamped on and i'm struggling to move and breath properly. Eating is fun as the right side of my face and teeth are really uncomfortable and my lip is cut. My vision has also been intermittently blurry and I have felt dizzy. I work for myself, so getting paid time off isn't an option. We did get some witnesses but if you or anyone you know saw this women attacking or verbally abusing anyone please let me know. Let's get the face of the women who thinks it's ok to stamp on someones face and head at Download Festival known. People like this should be banned from any festival for life. A big thanks to all the wonderful people who helped me. Download is a great festival, it's such a shame people like this spoil it for others.

Mandy Youngº

234,340 次观看 • 2 个月前

I don’t care about your politics anymore. I really don’t. If you’re still justifying ICE’s actions you’re done. That isn’t a disagreement anymore, that’s a moral failure. The claim that Alex Pretti, a 37 year old ICU nurse, was aggressive or that he was there to kill officers is not just false, it’s evil. It’s a deliberate lie. Kristi Noem repeating it isn’t confusion or poor judgment, it’s a malicious lie. This is the same woman with a documented history of cruelty and dishonesty, and now she’s in charge of Homeland Security. That should terrify everyone! If J.D. Vance and Trump’s team don’t cut her loose, they risk losing their base. This isn’t just Democrats anymore Republican supporters are fed up too. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: no one was ever opposed to deporting illegal immigrants, whether criminals or non-criminals. The justification was always public safety removing people who harm others, who commit violence, who kill. That was the idea! But now the very force that was supposed to protect the public is killing and harming American citizens! At that point, the distinction collapses. If an innocent American is killed, it makes no difference whether the trigger is pulled by a gang member or a federal agent. The outcome is the same: death, fear, and destruction, and I would argue it is even worst when your own is killing. The Trump administration has failed catastrophically with ICE and with Kristi Noem. And let’s be very clear about what’s happening. This is how authoritarianism starts. You give intelligence agencies and private contractors like Palantir powers they should never have and you're doomed. You normalize armed federal agents patrolling American streets. You lie about killings that are caught on camera. Then you label citizens “domestic terrorists” to justify it. First it’s immigrants. Then it’s protesters. Then it’s journalists. Then it’s you. Mark my words. It will be you! We’ve already seen it twice in two weeks. Alex a 37 years old, an ICU nurse at the VA, no criminal record, no violence and he was shot and killed, Just like Renee Good before him. Both were American citizens. Both were immediately smeared by the government as violent extremists. The videos are clear. Alex was filming something every American has the right to do. He approached no one aggressively. He was holding a phone. He was pepper-sprayed for no good reason. His legally carried firearm was removed by ICE. We have second amendment rights in this country, we can exercise them if we want to and honestly - in this American, seems to me we should do it daily! Only after he was disarmed and on the ground did an agent shoot him multiple times, in the back.And yet top officials Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, Greg Bovino went on camera and flat out lied. Not misspoke. Lied. they claimed he was ready to kill ICE officers. This is an attack on American peoples and their rights with bunch of lazy hater in uniforms. If the shooting were justified,they wouldn’t need to fabricate a story, they would not need to make things up.This is what should outrage everyone, regardless of where you stand on immigration or ICE. A government that lies this brazenly. When video evidence is available to anyone is a government that believes it no longer needs public consent to do anything.That is dangerous. There is no democracy in this country but at least we were always able to push back, now we have these people who think they are above the law everywhere. In foreign policy and oil, and in domestic policy too, I bet they’re about to learn their lesson. I’ve spoken to many cops who have pushed back against ICE officers, confronted them, and openly criticized them. Because at the end of the day, cops are regular Americans. They live in our neighborhoods, care about people and public safety, and took an oath to protect. Now they’re defending Americans, standing with them against these brainless haters in uniforms and that is something we should be proud of. As the daughter of a detective, I am extremely proud of these cops who are pushing back and protecting citizens. ICE is unprofessional; they are poorly trained, scared, and operating on hate nothing more. That’s something you see in North Korea not in this country. Enough is enough! Republican especially, should be alarmed. For years, the right warned against armed federal agents patrolling American streets. Waco, ruby ridge, DHS itself was controversial when it was created. The second amendment was defended precisely as a safeguard against government overreach. Here’s the new standard in America: if you are legally carrying a firearm, even if you never touch it, never threaten anyone, never break the law the government can label you a terrorist and kill you. Even if you are an American citizen. And the hypocrisy is staggering. These are the same people who screamed nonstop to free Kyle Rittenhouse, defending the principle that legal firearm possession or use in defence does not equal criminal intent. But now that ordinary Americans who fit that same standard are standing in front of them, they’ve completely reversed course. Suddenly, legal gun ownership is enough to justify lethal force. I’ve always been clear about this: when Trump is right on policy be it domestic or foreign, I give him credit, I support him fully. I’m not driven by blind loyalty so when he is wrong I speak up just as quickly and honestly. But this crosses a line. If the government can kill you for exercising a constitutional right without action, without threat, without due process, then the right itself no longer exists. That is not law and order. That is tyranny. If that’s the rule now, the second amendment is dead. What we are seeing is not law enforcement, it’s power without accountability. And history is very clear about where that road leads. More on my YouTube link in the Bio.
14:19

I don’t care about your politics anymore. I really don’t. If you’re still justifying ICE’s actions you’re done. That isn’t a disagreement anymore, that’s a moral failure. The claim that Alex Pretti, a 37 year old ICU nurse, was aggressive or that he was there to kill officers is not just false, it’s evil. It’s a deliberate lie. Kristi Noem repeating it isn’t confusion or poor judgment, it’s a malicious lie. This is the same woman with a documented history of cruelty and dishonesty, and now she’s in charge of Homeland Security. That should terrify everyone! If J.D. Vance and Trump’s team don’t cut her loose, they risk losing their base. This isn’t just Democrats anymore Republican supporters are fed up too. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: no one was ever opposed to deporting illegal immigrants, whether criminals or non-criminals. The justification was always public safety removing people who harm others, who commit violence, who kill. That was the idea! But now the very force that was supposed to protect the public is killing and harming American citizens! At that point, the distinction collapses. If an innocent American is killed, it makes no difference whether the trigger is pulled by a gang member or a federal agent. The outcome is the same: death, fear, and destruction, and I would argue it is even worst when your own is killing. The Trump administration has failed catastrophically with ICE and with Kristi Noem. And let’s be very clear about what’s happening. This is how authoritarianism starts. You give intelligence agencies and private contractors like Palantir powers they should never have and you're doomed. You normalize armed federal agents patrolling American streets. You lie about killings that are caught on camera. Then you label citizens “domestic terrorists” to justify it. First it’s immigrants. Then it’s protesters. Then it’s journalists. Then it’s you. Mark my words. It will be you! We’ve already seen it twice in two weeks. Alex a 37 years old, an ICU nurse at the VA, no criminal record, no violence and he was shot and killed, Just like Renee Good before him. Both were American citizens. Both were immediately smeared by the government as violent extremists. The videos are clear. Alex was filming something every American has the right to do. He approached no one aggressively. He was holding a phone. He was pepper-sprayed for no good reason. His legally carried firearm was removed by ICE. We have second amendment rights in this country, we can exercise them if we want to and honestly - in this American, seems to me we should do it daily! Only after he was disarmed and on the ground did an agent shoot him multiple times, in the back.And yet top officials Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, Greg Bovino went on camera and flat out lied. Not misspoke. Lied. they claimed he was ready to kill ICE officers. This is an attack on American peoples and their rights with bunch of lazy hater in uniforms. If the shooting were justified,they wouldn’t need to fabricate a story, they would not need to make things up.This is what should outrage everyone, regardless of where you stand on immigration or ICE. A government that lies this brazenly. When video evidence is available to anyone is a government that believes it no longer needs public consent to do anything.That is dangerous. There is no democracy in this country but at least we were always able to push back, now we have these people who think they are above the law everywhere. In foreign policy and oil, and in domestic policy too, I bet they’re about to learn their lesson. I’ve spoken to many cops who have pushed back against ICE officers, confronted them, and openly criticized them. Because at the end of the day, cops are regular Americans. They live in our neighborhoods, care about people and public safety, and took an oath to protect. Now they’re defending Americans, standing with them against these brainless haters in uniforms and that is something we should be proud of. As the daughter of a detective, I am extremely proud of these cops who are pushing back and protecting citizens. ICE is unprofessional; they are poorly trained, scared, and operating on hate nothing more. That’s something you see in North Korea not in this country. Enough is enough! Republican especially, should be alarmed. For years, the right warned against armed federal agents patrolling American streets. Waco, ruby ridge, DHS itself was controversial when it was created. The second amendment was defended precisely as a safeguard against government overreach. Here’s the new standard in America: if you are legally carrying a firearm, even if you never touch it, never threaten anyone, never break the law the government can label you a terrorist and kill you. Even if you are an American citizen. And the hypocrisy is staggering. These are the same people who screamed nonstop to free Kyle Rittenhouse, defending the principle that legal firearm possession or use in defence does not equal criminal intent. But now that ordinary Americans who fit that same standard are standing in front of them, they’ve completely reversed course. Suddenly, legal gun ownership is enough to justify lethal force. I’ve always been clear about this: when Trump is right on policy be it domestic or foreign, I give him credit, I support him fully. I’m not driven by blind loyalty so when he is wrong I speak up just as quickly and honestly. But this crosses a line. If the government can kill you for exercising a constitutional right without action, without threat, without due process, then the right itself no longer exists. That is not law and order. That is tyranny. If that’s the rule now, the second amendment is dead. What we are seeing is not law enforcement, it’s power without accountability. And history is very clear about where that road leads. More on my YouTube link in the Bio.

ELIZABETH LANE

50,363 次观看 • 6 个月前

The CLINTON FOUNDATION'S ties to USAID, BILLIONS of dollars of FRAUD in Haiti, and Child Trafficking. They call it "mismanagement" but we all know this is deliberate, professional mafia level corruption. The worst part of this story, backed by the people and officials of Haiti themselves, is that the Clintons collected over $13 billion in aid for Haiti but allegedly delivered less than 3% directly to the country, with funds allegedly diverted to UN entities, NGOs, personal gains, and figures like George Soros. The Clinton Foundation's initial backing goes back to the most infamous pedophile of all-time, Jeffrey Epstein, who reportedly helped fund its inception, and involvement in child trafficking scandals, such as the Laura Silsby case. Laura Silsby was arrested for attempting to transport children out of Haiti without proper documentation, noting that the Clintons arranged "allegedly" even though the Clintons themselves provided legal aid for her, and that the lawyer involved was later extradited and charged with child trafficking himself, along with his wife. So what's really going on here? If you're paying attention, the patterns persists and ALWAYS revolve around GREED, the LUST for POWER, CHILD TRAFFICKING, and SEXUAL ABUSE. The Clinton Foundation's involvement in Haiti relief efforts was just another way to scam taxpayers money into their own pockets taking advantage of a disaster, profiting off of another's misfortune. The 2010 Haiti earthquake killed over 200,000 people and displaced millions, prompting a global aid response. The Clinton Foundation, established in 2001 by former President Bill Clinton, positioned itself as a key player in recovery. By 2010, Bill Clinton served as the UN's special envoy to Haiti and co-chaired the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), which oversaw $13.3 billion in pledged aid. The foundation itself raised about $130 million for Haiti-specific projects, focusing on health, education, and economic development, though critics argue much of this went to overhead or non-Haitian entities. Allegations of mismanagement and massive amounts of corruption is nothing new when it comes to the Clintons, and in this case, the center on the IHRC's operations, where Haitian representatives reportedly had limited influence, with decisions favoring donor interests. For instance, the Caracol Industrial Park—a $300 million USAID-funded project promoted by the Clintons—promised 65,000 jobs but delivered only about 13,000 by 2017, while displacing local farmers. A related port project near Cap-Haïtien, allocated $72 million by USAID, was abandoned after feasibility studies deemed it unviable, leaving minimal infrastructure like unused electricity poles. Overall, less than 3% of USAID's $2.3 billion in Haiti contracts went to Haitian firms, with the bulk awarded to U.S. companies, fueling claims of neocolonialism and inefficiency. Total global pledges were around $13 billion, with the foundation handling a fraction. Alleged "Fact-checkers" claim that the Clintons did not personally profit, noting no salaries were drawn from the foundation and that the cooked books and "audited" financials show 86-89% of funds went to programs. "Allegedly," even though the Haitian people say the complete opposite. But the kicker is all the people of Haiti and its officials claim the Clintons used Haiti and the disaster to profit along with their friends protesting the Clintons to this day where other records and Haiti's own officials claim LESS THAN 3% out of $13 BILLION went to Haiti and its people. The Clintons even promised hundreds of new homes. Out of those hundreds promised, 7 were "built." When I say "built" I mean the Clinton's bought used formaldehyde infested trailers from FEMA for a cheaper price so they could pocket the rest of the taxpayer and donation funds and gave them to the Haitian people and the schools where kids and others got sick from the fumes. Transparency issues persist, just like everything else in government and revolving around the Clintons including unreported donations and overlaps between foundation work and Bill Clinton's paid speeches. As Secretary of State from 2009-2013, Hillary Clinton oversaw USAID, integrating it into U.S. foreign policy. The agency channeled billions in Haiti aid, often aligning with Clinton Foundation initiatives. For example, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a foundation offshoot, received USAID grants for health programs, including a $162 million commitment to expand microfinance and partnerships in countries like Malawi and Ghana. CHAI also secured a $2.2 million USAID grant during Clinton's tenure for work tied to economist Muhammad Yunus's Grameen entities, which donated to the foundation. Critics label this "pay-to-play," pointing to 85 donors (out of 154 private meetings with Clinton at State) who contributed up to $156 million to the foundation. Examples include Digicel founder Denis O'Brien, a major foundation donor, who won a lucrative Haitian telecom contract post-earthquake, and Yunus, who met Clinton multiple times amid USAID support for his organizations. WikiLeaks-released emails from 2016 revealed further entanglements, with foundation donors seeking access to State Department resources. The Clinton Foundation has faced scrutiny since its inception, with claims ranging from foreign influence-peddling to personal enrichment. The 2015 book Clinton Cash amplified these, alleging donors gained favors like uranium deals where all the usual suspects were involved and benefitted like the Podestas and Frank Giustra who were also involved in the Uranium One deal. Epstein's involvement is factual, the child trafficking links are factual rom the 2010 Laura Silsby incident. The "missionary," who was arrested for transporting 33 children without proper papers; the Clintons facilitated her release via a lawyer, Jorge Puello, who was later extradited for unrelated but other child trafficking charges. No "direct" Clinton involvement in trafficking has been substantiated but they just happened to hire and pay for her lawyer who was also a pedophile child trafficker. What are the odds though? Multiple FBI probes, including one lasting until January 2021, examined foreign donations and potential corruption but closed without charges because everyone who investigates ends up on the Clinton body count list. Whistleblower claims in 2017 alleged misuse of funds but also led nowhere... I wonder why? The foundation's defenders, including "fact-check" sites, argue allegations are politically motivated, with no convictions despite years of scrutiny, jus over 100+ people who all allegedly committed suicide or died in freak accidents who were connected to the Clintons and their shady dealings or were whistleblowers and extensive ties to Jeffery Epstein and many other child trafficking rumors including Pizzagate and are associated with many other alleged pedophiles. There are NO COINCIDENCES. It's time these people pay for their crimes.
36:17

The CLINTON FOUNDATION'S ties to USAID, BILLIONS of dollars of FRAUD in Haiti, and Child Trafficking. They call it "mismanagement" but we all know this is deliberate, professional mafia level corruption. The worst part of this story, backed by the people and officials of Haiti themselves, is that the Clintons collected over $13 billion in aid for Haiti but allegedly delivered less than 3% directly to the country, with funds allegedly diverted to UN entities, NGOs, personal gains, and figures like George Soros. The Clinton Foundation's initial backing goes back to the most infamous pedophile of all-time, Jeffrey Epstein, who reportedly helped fund its inception, and involvement in child trafficking scandals, such as the Laura Silsby case. Laura Silsby was arrested for attempting to transport children out of Haiti without proper documentation, noting that the Clintons arranged "allegedly" even though the Clintons themselves provided legal aid for her, and that the lawyer involved was later extradited and charged with child trafficking himself, along with his wife. So what's really going on here? If you're paying attention, the patterns persists and ALWAYS revolve around GREED, the LUST for POWER, CHILD TRAFFICKING, and SEXUAL ABUSE. The Clinton Foundation's involvement in Haiti relief efforts was just another way to scam taxpayers money into their own pockets taking advantage of a disaster, profiting off of another's misfortune. The 2010 Haiti earthquake killed over 200,000 people and displaced millions, prompting a global aid response. The Clinton Foundation, established in 2001 by former President Bill Clinton, positioned itself as a key player in recovery. By 2010, Bill Clinton served as the UN's special envoy to Haiti and co-chaired the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), which oversaw $13.3 billion in pledged aid. The foundation itself raised about $130 million for Haiti-specific projects, focusing on health, education, and economic development, though critics argue much of this went to overhead or non-Haitian entities. Allegations of mismanagement and massive amounts of corruption is nothing new when it comes to the Clintons, and in this case, the center on the IHRC's operations, where Haitian representatives reportedly had limited influence, with decisions favoring donor interests. For instance, the Caracol Industrial Park—a $300 million USAID-funded project promoted by the Clintons—promised 65,000 jobs but delivered only about 13,000 by 2017, while displacing local farmers. A related port project near Cap-Haïtien, allocated $72 million by USAID, was abandoned after feasibility studies deemed it unviable, leaving minimal infrastructure like unused electricity poles. Overall, less than 3% of USAID's $2.3 billion in Haiti contracts went to Haitian firms, with the bulk awarded to U.S. companies, fueling claims of neocolonialism and inefficiency. Total global pledges were around $13 billion, with the foundation handling a fraction. Alleged "Fact-checkers" claim that the Clintons did not personally profit, noting no salaries were drawn from the foundation and that the cooked books and "audited" financials show 86-89% of funds went to programs. "Allegedly," even though the Haitian people say the complete opposite. But the kicker is all the people of Haiti and its officials claim the Clintons used Haiti and the disaster to profit along with their friends protesting the Clintons to this day where other records and Haiti's own officials claim LESS THAN 3% out of $13 BILLION went to Haiti and its people. The Clintons even promised hundreds of new homes. Out of those hundreds promised, 7 were "built." When I say "built" I mean the Clinton's bought used formaldehyde infested trailers from FEMA for a cheaper price so they could pocket the rest of the taxpayer and donation funds and gave them to the Haitian people and the schools where kids and others got sick from the fumes. Transparency issues persist, just like everything else in government and revolving around the Clintons including unreported donations and overlaps between foundation work and Bill Clinton's paid speeches. As Secretary of State from 2009-2013, Hillary Clinton oversaw USAID, integrating it into U.S. foreign policy. The agency channeled billions in Haiti aid, often aligning with Clinton Foundation initiatives. For example, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a foundation offshoot, received USAID grants for health programs, including a $162 million commitment to expand microfinance and partnerships in countries like Malawi and Ghana. CHAI also secured a $2.2 million USAID grant during Clinton's tenure for work tied to economist Muhammad Yunus's Grameen entities, which donated to the foundation. Critics label this "pay-to-play," pointing to 85 donors (out of 154 private meetings with Clinton at State) who contributed up to $156 million to the foundation. Examples include Digicel founder Denis O'Brien, a major foundation donor, who won a lucrative Haitian telecom contract post-earthquake, and Yunus, who met Clinton multiple times amid USAID support for his organizations. WikiLeaks-released emails from 2016 revealed further entanglements, with foundation donors seeking access to State Department resources. The Clinton Foundation has faced scrutiny since its inception, with claims ranging from foreign influence-peddling to personal enrichment. The 2015 book Clinton Cash amplified these, alleging donors gained favors like uranium deals where all the usual suspects were involved and benefitted like the Podestas and Frank Giustra who were also involved in the Uranium One deal. Epstein's involvement is factual, the child trafficking links are factual rom the 2010 Laura Silsby incident. The "missionary," who was arrested for transporting 33 children without proper papers; the Clintons facilitated her release via a lawyer, Jorge Puello, who was later extradited for unrelated but other child trafficking charges. No "direct" Clinton involvement in trafficking has been substantiated but they just happened to hire and pay for her lawyer who was also a pedophile child trafficker. What are the odds though? Multiple FBI probes, including one lasting until January 2021, examined foreign donations and potential corruption but closed without charges because everyone who investigates ends up on the Clinton body count list. Whistleblower claims in 2017 alleged misuse of funds but also led nowhere... I wonder why? The foundation's defenders, including "fact-check" sites, argue allegations are politically motivated, with no convictions despite years of scrutiny, jus over 100+ people who all allegedly committed suicide or died in freak accidents who were connected to the Clintons and their shady dealings or were whistleblowers and extensive ties to Jeffery Epstein and many other child trafficking rumors including Pizzagate and are associated with many other alleged pedophiles. There are NO COINCIDENCES. It's time these people pay for their crimes.

The SCIF

75,765 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE_ Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 FULL SPEECH Ladies and gentlemen, I have seen the footage from Genoa-Kingston High School, and frankly, it is embarrassing. We are watching the collapse of Turning Point USA in real-time. THE CONTEXT: First, you need to know why she was there. This wasn't just a random visit. This was part of the "History Rocks Tour," sponsored by the Department of Education and Linda McMahon. Do not miss that detail. We are seeing the official merger of the Trump Administration and this new, hollow version of Turning Point USA. They picked one high school in Illinois to launch their new "Club America" chapter—which, by the way, sounds less like a patriot club and more like a cult initiation. THE PERFORMANCE: Erika Kirk took the stage, and she was a total mess. Low energy. Disheveled. Looking like she just rolled out of bed. If you are going to represent a movement that my friend Charlie built, have the respect to look the part. Instead, she looked like she was glitching through a bad script. THE HYPOCRISY: Let’s dismantle what she actually said, because the audacity is off the charts. 1. The "Charlie" Shield She said: "Charlie chose to use his voice..." The Truth: Erika, stop using your dead husband as a prop. You trot out his name to shield yourself from criticism while you are actively firing the very people who helped him build that voice. You are silencing 40+ employees with NDAs and threats, yet you stand there and preach about "using your voice"? It is manipulative, and it is shameful. 2. The "Front Page" Standard She said: "Never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper." The Truth: REALLY, ERIKA? Because you have spent every waking moment since Charlie’s death sending lawyers to scrub the internet, hiding facts, and silencing anyone who asks a question. You are terrified of transparency, yet you tell these kids to live transparently? This is gaslighting, plain and simple. 3. The "Mark on Your Soul" She said: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... even putting back a grocery cart." The Truth: This is pseudo-spiritual nonsense designed to instill fear. You want to talk about marks on the soul? How about the mark left by lying about your whereabouts on September 10th? How about the mark left by purging loyal staff? Your soul is the one we should be worried about. 4. The "Be a Lady" Lecture She said: "Ladies, be modest. Honor your parents." The Truth: You are standing on stage looking like a disaster, preaching modesty? You are honoring no one. You are dishonoring Charlie's memory by turning his organization into a vehicle for your own vanity and paranoia. THE TEARS: And then, of course, the waterworks. "Sorry, it's just been really emotional." Please. The voice cracks on cue. The pause is theatrical. It is a performance. She shifts from "bold preacher" to "grieving widow" the moment she needs sympathy. THE VERDICT: The protesters outside had it right. This isn't a movement anymore; it's a cover-up. Erika Kirk is telling students to "build something greater," while she is busy destroying the only thing her husband ever built. We are not buying the act, Erika. HELP US EXPOSE THE TRUTH: We are digging deep into the "Make Heaven Crowded" tour and the surveillance tech they are using. We need your help to keep this investigation going. Candace Owens 👇 SUPPORT THE INVESTIGATION BELOW 👇
11:50

🚨 EXCLUSIVE_ Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 FULL SPEECH Ladies and gentlemen, I have seen the footage from Genoa-Kingston High School, and frankly, it is embarrassing. We are watching the collapse of Turning Point USA in real-time. THE CONTEXT: First, you need to know why she was there. This wasn't just a random visit. This was part of the "History Rocks Tour," sponsored by the Department of Education and Linda McMahon. Do not miss that detail. We are seeing the official merger of the Trump Administration and this new, hollow version of Turning Point USA. They picked one high school in Illinois to launch their new "Club America" chapter—which, by the way, sounds less like a patriot club and more like a cult initiation. THE PERFORMANCE: Erika Kirk took the stage, and she was a total mess. Low energy. Disheveled. Looking like she just rolled out of bed. If you are going to represent a movement that my friend Charlie built, have the respect to look the part. Instead, she looked like she was glitching through a bad script. THE HYPOCRISY: Let’s dismantle what she actually said, because the audacity is off the charts. 1. The "Charlie" Shield She said: "Charlie chose to use his voice..." The Truth: Erika, stop using your dead husband as a prop. You trot out his name to shield yourself from criticism while you are actively firing the very people who helped him build that voice. You are silencing 40+ employees with NDAs and threats, yet you stand there and preach about "using your voice"? It is manipulative, and it is shameful. 2. The "Front Page" Standard She said: "Never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper." The Truth: REALLY, ERIKA? Because you have spent every waking moment since Charlie’s death sending lawyers to scrub the internet, hiding facts, and silencing anyone who asks a question. You are terrified of transparency, yet you tell these kids to live transparently? This is gaslighting, plain and simple. 3. The "Mark on Your Soul" She said: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... even putting back a grocery cart." The Truth: This is pseudo-spiritual nonsense designed to instill fear. You want to talk about marks on the soul? How about the mark left by lying about your whereabouts on September 10th? How about the mark left by purging loyal staff? Your soul is the one we should be worried about. 4. The "Be a Lady" Lecture She said: "Ladies, be modest. Honor your parents." The Truth: You are standing on stage looking like a disaster, preaching modesty? You are honoring no one. You are dishonoring Charlie's memory by turning his organization into a vehicle for your own vanity and paranoia. THE TEARS: And then, of course, the waterworks. "Sorry, it's just been really emotional." Please. The voice cracks on cue. The pause is theatrical. It is a performance. She shifts from "bold preacher" to "grieving widow" the moment she needs sympathy. THE VERDICT: The protesters outside had it right. This isn't a movement anymore; it's a cover-up. Erika Kirk is telling students to "build something greater," while she is busy destroying the only thing her husband ever built. We are not buying the act, Erika. HELP US EXPOSE THE TRUTH: We are digging deep into the "Make Heaven Crowded" tour and the surveillance tech they are using. We need your help to keep this investigation going. Candace Owens 👇 SUPPORT THE INVESTIGATION BELOW 👇

Project Constitution

125,648 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨UNITED STATES OF SAUDI ARABIA - WE ARE GIVING OUR COUNTRY AWAY! The King Fahd Mosque in Culver City (Los Angeles): A Saudi royal-funded ideological beachhead directly tied to the 9/11 hijackers from the moment they landed. While TikTok influencers film “good vibes,” shawarmas, and “American accents saying Inshallah” after Friday prayers… the reality is far darker. This $8.1 million white-marble mosque (with its 72-ft minaret) was a direct gift from King Fahd and his son Prince Abdulaziz bin Fahd. It was the first major mosque in North America fully funded by the Saudi royal family (land purchased 1993, construction funded 1995, opened 1998). It was built as part of the Kingdom’s global campaign to export Wahhabism or simply Islam that Saudi Arabia has spent billions spreading worldwide through its Ministry of Islamic Affairs (MOIA). The mosque is operated by the Islamic Foundation of Shaikh Ibn Taymiyyah - named after the medieval scholar repeatedly cited by jihadists to justify violent expansion and killing of “apostates” and non-Muslims. But it gets worse. The imam at the time was Fahad al-Thumairy - a Saudi diplomat posted to the LA consulate and a designated MOIA “propagator.” He led a jihadi faction inside the mosque and kept copies of Islamic literature there (in Arabic and English) that explicitly called for the killing of non-Muslims and apostates. FBI sources described Thumairy as having “extreme anti-U.S. views” and inspiring jihadis at the mosque. 🚨The 9/11 hijackers’ first stop in America: On January 15, 2000, terrorists Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi landed at LAX. The very first place they went was the King Fahd Mosque. Thumairy immediately tasked a trusted associate (Mohammed Johar) to take care of them - arranging housing in a nearby Culver City apartment walking distance from the mosque, transportation, and logistics. The two hijackers met Thumairy at the mosque. One even led prayers there later. They returned to the mosque before one of them left the U.S. in June 2000. Thumairy had advance notice. Witnesses and patterns of calls strongly indicate he knew “two brothers” were coming and needed help. Even before the hijackers arrived: In December 1999 - just weeks before the hijackers landed - Thumairy helped arrange lodging near the mosque for people connected to the Millennium Plot (the foiled al-Qaeda attempt to bomb LAX on New Year’s Eve 1999). The mosque itself was flagged by the FBI as a site of “extremist-related activity both before and after 9/11.” Multiple FBI subjects had close ties to it. Agents believed Saudi government money was being laundered through the mosque to nonprofit fronts linked to Osama bin Laden overseas. After 9/11, some people at the mosque openly celebrated, with one reportedly saying “Isn’t it great that our brothers are fighting?” Thumairy was eventually removed from the mosque for his “immoderate” activities. In 2003, the U.S. State Department barred him from re-entering the country, determining he “might be connected with terrorist activity.” These same two hijackers then moved to the Islamic Center of San Diego - the exact mosque now back in the news. 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals. Their support network was already operating on American soil - at a Saudi royal-funded mosque in Los Angeles. This was never just a “community center.” It was a Saudi ideological outpost designed to spread terror and maintain influence networks in the United States. The “good vibes” videos are the mask. The documented history - royal funding, jihadi literature, advance support for hijackers, money laundering suspicions, and pre-9/11 terror connections, is the reality. AMERICA- Foreign-funded mosques like this MUST BE KICKED OUT OF AMERICA - They are MILITARY OUTPOSTS... WHAT THE HELL ARE WE DOING, AMERICA!? 99% OF THE GOP WILL TALK ABOUT ANYTHING BUT ISLAM - THEY WILL ADDRESS ANTIFA, NOW THE DSA, BUT NOT ISLAM....WE ARE GOING TO LOSE OUR COUNTRY!
0:36

🚨UNITED STATES OF SAUDI ARABIA - WE ARE GIVING OUR COUNTRY AWAY! The King Fahd Mosque in Culver City (Los Angeles): A Saudi royal-funded ideological beachhead directly tied to the 9/11 hijackers from the moment they landed. While TikTok influencers film “good vibes,” shawarmas, and “American accents saying Inshallah” after Friday prayers… the reality is far darker. This $8.1 million white-marble mosque (with its 72-ft minaret) was a direct gift from King Fahd and his son Prince Abdulaziz bin Fahd. It was the first major mosque in North America fully funded by the Saudi royal family (land purchased 1993, construction funded 1995, opened 1998). It was built as part of the Kingdom’s global campaign to export Wahhabism or simply Islam that Saudi Arabia has spent billions spreading worldwide through its Ministry of Islamic Affairs (MOIA). The mosque is operated by the Islamic Foundation of Shaikh Ibn Taymiyyah - named after the medieval scholar repeatedly cited by jihadists to justify violent expansion and killing of “apostates” and non-Muslims. But it gets worse. The imam at the time was Fahad al-Thumairy - a Saudi diplomat posted to the LA consulate and a designated MOIA “propagator.” He led a jihadi faction inside the mosque and kept copies of Islamic literature there (in Arabic and English) that explicitly called for the killing of non-Muslims and apostates. FBI sources described Thumairy as having “extreme anti-U.S. views” and inspiring jihadis at the mosque. 🚨The 9/11 hijackers’ first stop in America: On January 15, 2000, terrorists Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi landed at LAX. The very first place they went was the King Fahd Mosque. Thumairy immediately tasked a trusted associate (Mohammed Johar) to take care of them - arranging housing in a nearby Culver City apartment walking distance from the mosque, transportation, and logistics. The two hijackers met Thumairy at the mosque. One even led prayers there later. They returned to the mosque before one of them left the U.S. in June 2000. Thumairy had advance notice. Witnesses and patterns of calls strongly indicate he knew “two brothers” were coming and needed help. Even before the hijackers arrived: In December 1999 - just weeks before the hijackers landed - Thumairy helped arrange lodging near the mosque for people connected to the Millennium Plot (the foiled al-Qaeda attempt to bomb LAX on New Year’s Eve 1999). The mosque itself was flagged by the FBI as a site of “extremist-related activity both before and after 9/11.” Multiple FBI subjects had close ties to it. Agents believed Saudi government money was being laundered through the mosque to nonprofit fronts linked to Osama bin Laden overseas. After 9/11, some people at the mosque openly celebrated, with one reportedly saying “Isn’t it great that our brothers are fighting?” Thumairy was eventually removed from the mosque for his “immoderate” activities. In 2003, the U.S. State Department barred him from re-entering the country, determining he “might be connected with terrorist activity.” These same two hijackers then moved to the Islamic Center of San Diego - the exact mosque now back in the news. 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals. Their support network was already operating on American soil - at a Saudi royal-funded mosque in Los Angeles. This was never just a “community center.” It was a Saudi ideological outpost designed to spread terror and maintain influence networks in the United States. The “good vibes” videos are the mask. The documented history - royal funding, jihadi literature, advance support for hijackers, money laundering suspicions, and pre-9/11 terror connections, is the reality. AMERICA- Foreign-funded mosques like this MUST BE KICKED OUT OF AMERICA - They are MILITARY OUTPOSTS... WHAT THE HELL ARE WE DOING, AMERICA!? 99% OF THE GOP WILL TALK ABOUT ANYTHING BUT ISLAM - THEY WILL ADDRESS ANTIFA, NOW THE DSA, BUT NOT ISLAM....WE ARE GOING TO LOSE OUR COUNTRY!

Amy Mek

143,701 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kessur Ajaib dragged a 14-year-old into a Rotherham alleyway and raped her. Mohammed Makhmood grabbed the same girl at a bus stop, led her to a graveyard, raped her, then spat on her and laughed. This is What White Girls Were For. That is not interpretation. Those are the facts from Sheffield Crown Court. And they are not isolated incidents. Twenty years later in Birmingham, Arqash Zaffar and Mohammed Nadim snatched another White girl off the street, trafficked her across three cities, and delivered her to hotel rooms where men queued to rape her. One rapist in Dewsbury was even more direct about the politics. He told his victim: "We're here to fuck all the White girls and fuck the government." This is now part of the official parliamentary record. In April 2025, Conservative MP Katie Lam stood in the House of Commons and forced those words into Hansard. She read them from court transcripts that document a twenty-year campaign of racial warfare against British children. This is not about historical crimes. It is about an ongoing system of institutional protection that enabled those crimes and continues to enable them today. It is about networks that remain operational, an ideology that remains intact, and a government that would rather protect Pakistani rapists than confront the scale of what it allowed to happen. This is What White Girls Were For will be published later today. Please take the time to read it and share. _________ We are not where we are by accident. We will not get where we need to be if we leave it to those that were part of the cover up to deliver justice. Stand with me. I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Establishment fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe or support here: 🔴 If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE
2:04

Kessur Ajaib dragged a 14-year-old into a Rotherham alleyway and raped her. Mohammed Makhmood grabbed the same girl at a bus stop, led her to a graveyard, raped her, then spat on her and laughed. This is What White Girls Were For. That is not interpretation. Those are the facts from Sheffield Crown Court. And they are not isolated incidents. Twenty years later in Birmingham, Arqash Zaffar and Mohammed Nadim snatched another White girl off the street, trafficked her across three cities, and delivered her to hotel rooms where men queued to rape her. One rapist in Dewsbury was even more direct about the politics. He told his victim: "We're here to fuck all the White girls and fuck the government." This is now part of the official parliamentary record. In April 2025, Conservative MP Katie Lam stood in the House of Commons and forced those words into Hansard. She read them from court transcripts that document a twenty-year campaign of racial warfare against British children. This is not about historical crimes. It is about an ongoing system of institutional protection that enabled those crimes and continues to enable them today. It is about networks that remain operational, an ideology that remains intact, and a government that would rather protect Pakistani rapists than confront the scale of what it allowed to happen. This is What White Girls Were For will be published later today. Please take the time to read it and share. _________ We are not where we are by accident. We will not get where we need to be if we leave it to those that were part of the cover up to deliver justice. Stand with me. I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Establishment fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe or support here: 🔴 If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

167,630 次观看 • 8 个月前

🔥👀ARE WE SEEING IT YET? What is Thune up to in Texas? If Talarico wins do you know what this could actually mean for Texas? Watch & read this all the way to the end and tell me if everything clicks. We have a SERIOUS problem in Texas. The same GOP groups that spent $120 MILLION (Election history record) supporting Cornyn & attacking Paxton have only spent $500k on Paxton since he won the nomination. The Democrats have spent 48x more money supporting Talarico & attacking Paxton. Why doesn’t everyone know this? Thune essentially controls the spending. Wanna bet the money that Democrats were gonna spend on Platner will now be diverted to Texas? Just weeks ago…. Obama flew into Austin for a surprise in-person appearance with his hand-picked candidate. James Talarico. 37. Never married. Zero public relationships or girlfriends in all these years. He’s always said he’s straight. But his only dating history mention? One single line in Texas Monthly… quietly inserted by his own campaign team after the fact. They claimed he dated the homecoming queen back when he was the theater kid superstar in high school. For years: publicly single, private life. Then — right as questions heated up — he suddenly flies to LA for an emergency podcast drop and reveals he has a girlfriend. Calls her “my rock. My best friend.” Days later? She appears out of nowhere in a perfectly timed media story with “obtained” photos that raise more questions than answers. Here’s the thing: Her name is Brianna Menard — his former Chief of Staff. Her old bio highlighted “dancing the night away” at Cheer Up Charlie’s… Austin’s biggest queer-friendly bar famous for drag nights and the LGBTQ scene. Talarico brands himself as a devout Christian with Christmas sermons and family faith at the center. She’s a committed vegan, yoga buff, with a prominent “Jai Gurudev” Hindu spiritual tattoo. His progressive church library? Stocked with Gender Queer, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and This Book Is Gay — the exact books parents fought to pull from Texas school libraries. Four years of “dating” and she’s completely missing from every single Christmas or holiday post. No photos. No mentions. No family integration. They now claim annual Austin City Limits trips and Big Bend getaways… but those photos only dropped the second scrutiny got loud. No dates. Could be friends. Almost zero clear romantic shots. Why hide a former subordinate turned “girlfriend” for years? Democrats hammer everyone else on that. Or… maybe she was the safest public choice. An ally who would stay on message. (She’s since deleted her socials and now works for a PAC.) Meanwhile, national Dem heavyweights just poured over $30 MILLION into his campaign — big checks from Reid Hoffman, Pritzker, LA & NYC elites. Nearly half the large donations coming from outside Texas. They’re all-in on flipping red Texas. Texas has elected exactly ONLY ONE gay member of Congress in its history. Never an openly gay Senator. We know Obama is his kingmaker. We know Eric Holder vetted Tim Walz before being chosen as VP. We know Holder is Obama’s wingman. Now who did Tim Walz pardon last week? I was right on Platner almost a year ago that he was selected. THE LEFT IS CHOOSING THESE CANDIDATES FOR A REASON. He’s attended multiple Pride events. So I have to ask… Has Talarico himself ever spent real time at Cheer Up Charlie’s? Make sure everyone in Texas sees this ASAP. Is the Uniparty tanking Texas as revenge over Cornyn? WE CANNOT LOSE TEXAS.
3:33

🔥👀ARE WE SEEING IT YET? What is Thune up to in Texas? If Talarico wins do you know what this could actually mean for Texas? Watch & read this all the way to the end and tell me if everything clicks. We have a SERIOUS problem in Texas. The same GOP groups that spent $120 MILLION (Election history record) supporting Cornyn & attacking Paxton have only spent $500k on Paxton since he won the nomination. The Democrats have spent 48x more money supporting Talarico & attacking Paxton. Why doesn’t everyone know this? Thune essentially controls the spending. Wanna bet the money that Democrats were gonna spend on Platner will now be diverted to Texas? Just weeks ago…. Obama flew into Austin for a surprise in-person appearance with his hand-picked candidate. James Talarico. 37. Never married. Zero public relationships or girlfriends in all these years. He’s always said he’s straight. But his only dating history mention? One single line in Texas Monthly… quietly inserted by his own campaign team after the fact. They claimed he dated the homecoming queen back when he was the theater kid superstar in high school. For years: publicly single, private life. Then — right as questions heated up — he suddenly flies to LA for an emergency podcast drop and reveals he has a girlfriend. Calls her “my rock. My best friend.” Days later? She appears out of nowhere in a perfectly timed media story with “obtained” photos that raise more questions than answers. Here’s the thing: Her name is Brianna Menard — his former Chief of Staff. Her old bio highlighted “dancing the night away” at Cheer Up Charlie’s… Austin’s biggest queer-friendly bar famous for drag nights and the LGBTQ scene. Talarico brands himself as a devout Christian with Christmas sermons and family faith at the center. She’s a committed vegan, yoga buff, with a prominent “Jai Gurudev” Hindu spiritual tattoo. His progressive church library? Stocked with Gender Queer, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and This Book Is Gay — the exact books parents fought to pull from Texas school libraries. Four years of “dating” and she’s completely missing from every single Christmas or holiday post. No photos. No mentions. No family integration. They now claim annual Austin City Limits trips and Big Bend getaways… but those photos only dropped the second scrutiny got loud. No dates. Could be friends. Almost zero clear romantic shots. Why hide a former subordinate turned “girlfriend” for years? Democrats hammer everyone else on that. Or… maybe she was the safest public choice. An ally who would stay on message. (She’s since deleted her socials and now works for a PAC.) Meanwhile, national Dem heavyweights just poured over $30 MILLION into his campaign — big checks from Reid Hoffman, Pritzker, LA & NYC elites. Nearly half the large donations coming from outside Texas. They’re all-in on flipping red Texas. Texas has elected exactly ONLY ONE gay member of Congress in its history. Never an openly gay Senator. We know Obama is his kingmaker. We know Eric Holder vetted Tim Walz before being chosen as VP. We know Holder is Obama’s wingman. Now who did Tim Walz pardon last week? I was right on Platner almost a year ago that he was selected. THE LEFT IS CHOOSING THESE CANDIDATES FOR A REASON. He’s attended multiple Pride events. So I have to ask… Has Talarico himself ever spent real time at Cheer Up Charlie’s? Make sure everyone in Texas sees this ASAP. Is the Uniparty tanking Texas as revenge over Cornyn? WE CANNOT LOSE TEXAS.

Johnny St.Pete

12,700 次观看 • 1 个月前

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Inter—oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathy—not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: “I was too harsh… I feel guilty” - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (“mean”) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: “after understanding the monster she faced” (Brian Tully’s state police unit—capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmore’s murder). - He didn’t know the depth of that “monster” at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. “Propagandized into hating her” - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategy—he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadn’t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the “Monster” - The turning point: learning what Tully’s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same “monster” targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karen’s position. - “You really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.” - This is profound: empathy isn’t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - “I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me… because I didn't know what they were capable of.” - He’s not demanding it. He’s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: “why would I think… the state police would be capable of… very very very bad things.” - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they don’t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesn’t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (“who Karen knows in the feds and why… movements that morning”). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldn’t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (“very complimentary of Karen's intelligence”). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - It’s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Read—not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why he’s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grant’s quiet apology and redemption arc—not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. It’s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. It’s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.
10:03

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Inter—oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathy—not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: “I was too harsh… I feel guilty” - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (“mean”) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: “after understanding the monster she faced” (Brian Tully’s state police unit—capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmore’s murder). - He didn’t know the depth of that “monster” at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. “Propagandized into hating her” - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategy—he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadn’t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the “Monster” - The turning point: learning what Tully’s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same “monster” targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karen’s position. - “You really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.” - This is profound: empathy isn’t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - “I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me… because I didn't know what they were capable of.” - He’s not demanding it. He’s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: “why would I think… the state police would be capable of… very very very bad things.” - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they don’t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesn’t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (“who Karen knows in the feds and why… movements that morning”). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldn’t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (“very complimentary of Karen's intelligence”). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - It’s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Read—not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why he’s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grant’s quiet apology and redemption arc—not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. It’s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. It’s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,187 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 So Apparently Erika Kirk and TPUSA are also now part of this shady "History Rocks Tour" sponsored by the Dept. of Education with Linda McMahon. More evidence of The Trump admin colluding with Erika and Turning Point. . Genoa- Kingston High School in IL was the ONLY high school picked in the entire state, all thanks to their newly minted TPUSA "Club America" chapter (sounds culty already, right?). But Erika? Total MESS: Low-energy zombie mode, disheveled AF with rat's nest hair, awkward pauses like she's glitching on her script. And the HYPOCRISY? Off the charts! Let's cook her line-by-line—I'm going word-for-word, exposing every lie, fake act, cult vibe, and bitter shade. This is her using Charlie as a prop while preaching what she NEVER practices. 🔥 Let's break it down because this fraud needs a full roast: 1⃣Invoking Charlie RIGHT OFF THE BAT: "Charlie lived his life in a way where he was not afraid to speak. He chose to use his voice for something so powerful..." 🙄 Classic crutch! Erika, you trot out Charlie's name like a emotional shield EVERY time. But reminder: You've been gaslighting everyone about his death, hiding 4K footage, and firing 40+ staff who MIGHT speak out. Hypocrite Alert: You silence voices while praising "using your voice"? Cult-like manipulation—using a dead man's legacy to prop up your failing empire. And that voice change? From soft "emotional" whisper to loud preach—pure acting, flipping on a dime like a bad soap opera. 2⃣Soul-Marking Choices BS: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... As a young man, know that one day you're gonna be a father. Know that the way that you treat women... It matters." 😂 Erika preaching morality? YOU, who allegedly orchestrated shady deals with "Pierre" (billions in French-Israeli trafficking vibes?), lied about your whereabouts on Sept 10th, and sent cease-and-desist letters to shut down free speech? Lie Exposed: You fire people for "might" be talking smack online, but tell kids decisions "mark your soul"? Your soul's got more red flags than a communist parade. Bitter much? This screams adversarial—projecting your own guilt onto teens. 3⃣Ladies, Be Ladies Hypocrisy: "Ladies, be that. Be ladies, be modest. Live your life in a way that's honoring, honor your parents." 😤 LOOK AT YOU, Erika! Disheveled mess on stage—hair like a bird's nest after a storm, low-energy slop. You're the OPPOSITE of "proper" or "modest." Hypocrite Level 1000: Telling girls to "be ladies" while you act like a hot mess express? And honoring parents? You dishonor Charlie's memory by using him as a prop! Voice shift here: Goes soft and "inspirational," but it's FAKE—eyes dead, pauses like she's reading cue cards. Culty: Pushing this "higher standard" while your org's a purge factory. 4⃣Building Greater Things Lie: "Build something greater than just focusing on what's next in your life. Don't compromise your character." 🤡 "Build something"? Erika, WHAT have YOU built? TPUSA was Charlie's baby—you're just the widow riding coattails, firing loyalists, and dodging transparency. Lie Called Out: You compromise character DAILY—gaslighting about assassinations, ignoring questions, outright lying on Fox. Bitter Tone: "You guys might think it's great to go along with the crowd... to laugh at certain things that aren't funny." Projecting your online hate? People are "laughing" at YOU for being fake and inauthentic. Act Detected: Loud emphasis on "build," then soft pause—shifting expressions like a chameleon. 5⃣Newspaper Front Page Wisdom?: "My aunt used to tell me, never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper. Live your life in that way... not because you're afraid, but because you hold yourself to a higher standard." 💀 IRONY OVERLOAD! Erika, your scandals ARE front-page material: Shady Egyptian planes, Bibi Netanyahu ties, firing sprees, hypocrisy on transparency. Hypocrite Roast: You hide behind lawyers and PR billions, but preach "higher standard"? Cult Vibe: This "people are watching" paranoia sounds like Big Brother TPUSA—watching staff, silencing critics. Voice Weirdness: Draws out "higher standard" loudly, then whispers—total performance, not genuine. 6⃣Insulting People & Assassin's Choices: "You might think it's cool to insult people... The man that took my husband's life, he made a choice over a course of time. He made the wrong decision consistently." 😡 Using the assassin as a moral prop? Low blow, Erika. But YOU insult and attack creators with legal threats for using First Amendment rights! Lie Exposed: "Stand up for the First Amendment" elsewhere, but here warning against "insulting"? You're feeling the online heat—words DO hurt when they're true about your fakeness. Adversarial Bitter: Blaming "choices" while your choices include cover-ups and psyops. Act Alert: Pauses dramatically before "he made the wrong decision"—theatrical AF. 7⃣Grocery Cart Eternal Soul Mark?: "Even though your choice might be small... deciding whether or not to put the grocery cart back... Those choices leave a mark on your soul, feed for eternity. People are watching." 🤦‍♂️ Culty AF! Turning a cart into "eternal soul mark"? This is fear-mongering manipulation—guilt-tripping kids into obedience. Hypocrite: You "watch" your staff like a hawk, firing them preemptively. Bitter Projection: "One day, your kids will watch you." Subtle shade at critics? Voice Shift: Soft and "wise," but it's scripted—long pause before "feed for eternity" like she forgot her line. 8⃣Emotional Breakdown Act: "Sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days. I apologize." 🥱 FAKE TEARS ALERT! This "emotional" pivot? Pure act—voice cracks on cue, but eyes say otherwise. Using "Charlie started here" as another prop. Hypocrite: Preaching boldness while you're low-energy and messy. Cult End: "Be bold and fearless. Not everyone is called to be on the front lines." Translation: Obey quietly, don't protest like those outside! This clip is PEAK Erika: Hypocritical, culty, acting queen using Charlie as bait. Protests outside? Deserved! Tag Candace Owens, watch, and RT if you're over the lies—TPUSA's crumbling! 💥 📡Side Note: Help us expose TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" below 👇 -WE NEED YOUR HELP
3:59

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 So Apparently Erika Kirk and TPUSA are also now part of this shady "History Rocks Tour" sponsored by the Dept. of Education with Linda McMahon. More evidence of The Trump admin colluding with Erika and Turning Point. . Genoa- Kingston High School in IL was the ONLY high school picked in the entire state, all thanks to their newly minted TPUSA "Club America" chapter (sounds culty already, right?). But Erika? Total MESS: Low-energy zombie mode, disheveled AF with rat's nest hair, awkward pauses like she's glitching on her script. And the HYPOCRISY? Off the charts! Let's cook her line-by-line—I'm going word-for-word, exposing every lie, fake act, cult vibe, and bitter shade. This is her using Charlie as a prop while preaching what she NEVER practices. 🔥 Let's break it down because this fraud needs a full roast: 1⃣Invoking Charlie RIGHT OFF THE BAT: "Charlie lived his life in a way where he was not afraid to speak. He chose to use his voice for something so powerful..." 🙄 Classic crutch! Erika, you trot out Charlie's name like a emotional shield EVERY time. But reminder: You've been gaslighting everyone about his death, hiding 4K footage, and firing 40+ staff who MIGHT speak out. Hypocrite Alert: You silence voices while praising "using your voice"? Cult-like manipulation—using a dead man's legacy to prop up your failing empire. And that voice change? From soft "emotional" whisper to loud preach—pure acting, flipping on a dime like a bad soap opera. 2⃣Soul-Marking Choices BS: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... As a young man, know that one day you're gonna be a father. Know that the way that you treat women... It matters." 😂 Erika preaching morality? YOU, who allegedly orchestrated shady deals with "Pierre" (billions in French-Israeli trafficking vibes?), lied about your whereabouts on Sept 10th, and sent cease-and-desist letters to shut down free speech? Lie Exposed: You fire people for "might" be talking smack online, but tell kids decisions "mark your soul"? Your soul's got more red flags than a communist parade. Bitter much? This screams adversarial—projecting your own guilt onto teens. 3⃣Ladies, Be Ladies Hypocrisy: "Ladies, be that. Be ladies, be modest. Live your life in a way that's honoring, honor your parents." 😤 LOOK AT YOU, Erika! Disheveled mess on stage—hair like a bird's nest after a storm, low-energy slop. You're the OPPOSITE of "proper" or "modest." Hypocrite Level 1000: Telling girls to "be ladies" while you act like a hot mess express? And honoring parents? You dishonor Charlie's memory by using him as a prop! Voice shift here: Goes soft and "inspirational," but it's FAKE—eyes dead, pauses like she's reading cue cards. Culty: Pushing this "higher standard" while your org's a purge factory. 4⃣Building Greater Things Lie: "Build something greater than just focusing on what's next in your life. Don't compromise your character." 🤡 "Build something"? Erika, WHAT have YOU built? TPUSA was Charlie's baby—you're just the widow riding coattails, firing loyalists, and dodging transparency. Lie Called Out: You compromise character DAILY—gaslighting about assassinations, ignoring questions, outright lying on Fox. Bitter Tone: "You guys might think it's great to go along with the crowd... to laugh at certain things that aren't funny." Projecting your online hate? People are "laughing" at YOU for being fake and inauthentic. Act Detected: Loud emphasis on "build," then soft pause—shifting expressions like a chameleon. 5⃣Newspaper Front Page Wisdom?: "My aunt used to tell me, never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper. Live your life in that way... not because you're afraid, but because you hold yourself to a higher standard." 💀 IRONY OVERLOAD! Erika, your scandals ARE front-page material: Shady Egyptian planes, Bibi Netanyahu ties, firing sprees, hypocrisy on transparency. Hypocrite Roast: You hide behind lawyers and PR billions, but preach "higher standard"? Cult Vibe: This "people are watching" paranoia sounds like Big Brother TPUSA—watching staff, silencing critics. Voice Weirdness: Draws out "higher standard" loudly, then whispers—total performance, not genuine. 6⃣Insulting People & Assassin's Choices: "You might think it's cool to insult people... The man that took my husband's life, he made a choice over a course of time. He made the wrong decision consistently." 😡 Using the assassin as a moral prop? Low blow, Erika. But YOU insult and attack creators with legal threats for using First Amendment rights! Lie Exposed: "Stand up for the First Amendment" elsewhere, but here warning against "insulting"? You're feeling the online heat—words DO hurt when they're true about your fakeness. Adversarial Bitter: Blaming "choices" while your choices include cover-ups and psyops. Act Alert: Pauses dramatically before "he made the wrong decision"—theatrical AF. 7⃣Grocery Cart Eternal Soul Mark?: "Even though your choice might be small... deciding whether or not to put the grocery cart back... Those choices leave a mark on your soul, feed for eternity. People are watching." 🤦‍♂️ Culty AF! Turning a cart into "eternal soul mark"? This is fear-mongering manipulation—guilt-tripping kids into obedience. Hypocrite: You "watch" your staff like a hawk, firing them preemptively. Bitter Projection: "One day, your kids will watch you." Subtle shade at critics? Voice Shift: Soft and "wise," but it's scripted—long pause before "feed for eternity" like she forgot her line. 8⃣Emotional Breakdown Act: "Sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days. I apologize." 🥱 FAKE TEARS ALERT! This "emotional" pivot? Pure act—voice cracks on cue, but eyes say otherwise. Using "Charlie started here" as another prop. Hypocrite: Preaching boldness while you're low-energy and messy. Cult End: "Be bold and fearless. Not everyone is called to be on the front lines." Translation: Obey quietly, don't protest like those outside! This clip is PEAK Erika: Hypocritical, culty, acting queen using Charlie as bait. Protests outside? Deserved! Tag Candace Owens, watch, and RT if you're over the lies—TPUSA's crumbling! 💥 📡Side Note: Help us expose TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" below 👇 -WE NEED YOUR HELP

Project Constitution

947,261 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇩🇪🔴Fact Check: German far-left leader claims most high-profile gang rape suspects are all White men. “Let’s start with gang rape. So the most prominent cases we know of are all white men. Epstein, gang rape, Gisele Pelicot in France, gang rape, all by white men,” said Jan van Aken, the co-leader of the German Left Party. His claims about Gisele Pelicot being “gang raped” by “all by white men” is rated as FALSE. According to analysis of names in the case, 12 have a Middle Eastern/North African names plus the 3 names associated with sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific Islands. This means 27.5% of the 51 suspects are likely non-White. Not only is this far from “all” the suspects, but Middle Eastern and North Africans are estimated to be only 10% of the French population, which means they were significantly overrepresented in the rape of Pelicot. Regarding Epstein, while the charges in the case are reprehensible, nobody has been specifically convicted of gang rape in the case. There are numerous allegations that Prince Andrew committed gang rape but his case remains under investigation. The case involving Sean Diddy Combs, while not as prominent as the Epstein affair, also involved numerous allegations of gang rape as well, all involving African American suspects. Van Aken further states: “Gang rape exists, it’s a huge problem. But to pretend that this is a migration problem, I would put a big question mark over that.” The German statistics paint an entirely different story. Germany-wide, approximately 50% of all gang rape arrests involve foreign nationals, which predominately come from non-White regions like North Africa, the Middle East, and sub-Saharan African countries. Going further, if we examine only high-profile gang rape cases in Germany, it is clear that non-White suspects dominate. Cologne New Year’s Eve 2015/16 Approximately 2,000 men participated in mass sexual assaults on over 1,200 women across multiple German cities. The perpetrators were predominantly men from North Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia) and the Middle East who had recently arrived as part of the 2015 migrant wave. Many of the women were forcibly gang raped by large crowds of non-White males. The scale of the attacks and the initial reluctance of police and media to report on them caused a massive political storm and directly led to Germany rewriting its sexual assault laws in 2016 Freiburg 2018 An 18-year-old woman was drugged inside a discotheque by a 22-year-old Syrian Kurd and then raped outside the building by a series of men. Eight perpetrators were convicted — seven Syrians and one German — while two additional men were convicted for failing to aid the victim. The case intensified the national debate over migration and deportation of criminal asylum seekers.The defendants comprised one German citizen, eight Syrians, two Algerians and one Iraqi. The main suspect, a 22-year-old Syrian Kurd, was already the subject of unenforced arrest warrants for other crimes at the time of the attack. Emma S., 2019 A 15-year-old girl was lured into bushes on a September night and raped by 11 men, two of whom also filmed the attack in September 2019. Two of the named perpetrators, Arsen K. and Fares L., filmed the attack. Based on available reporting the group was predominantly of migrant background, consistent with the broader Freiburg-area cases of that period. Hamburg Stadtpark, 2020 Nine men and boys gang-raped a 15-year-old girl in a Hamburg park over several hours in September 2020. All were under 20 at the time, meaning they were subject to juvenile law. Only one — an Iranian national who was 19 at the time — spent any time in jail. The case later made headlines again when a 20-year-old woman was sentenced to a weekend in jail for calling one of the rapists a “disgraceful rapist pig” on WhatsApp — a harsher punishment than most of the perpetrators received. All nine convicted men reportedly hailed from Afghanistan, Armenia, Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Libya and Poland. Four of the defendants were German nationals, while four others held Armenian, Afghan, Kuwaiti and Montenegrin citizenship.. Only one, the Iranian national, received a prison sentence. Görlitzer Park, Berlin 2023 Three African men were charged with the rape, grievous bodily harm and aggravated robbery of a 27-year-old Georgian tourist. One of the suspects was a 21-year-old Somali man who had been traveling illegally in Germany since 2016 under eleven different identities. A second was a 22-year-old man from Guinea-Bissau said to have had four other identities and a criminal record across nine cases. Mallorca rape, 2023 In 2023, after the international media loudly trumpeted that five German men were arrested for raping an 18-year-old Spanish girl, it was quickly revealed that all of the men have a “migration background.” Nevertheless, the vast majority of news outlets referred to the men as “Germans” and most made no mention of the fact that the men had a migration background, with many outlets even referring to them as a “German pack.” While Spanish news outlet Ultima Hora reported that the 21- to 23-year-old suspects were of Turkish origin, much of the Spanish press was fixated on the “German” aspect of the crime, which the men allegedly filmed on their smartphones. Even the German press was quick to claim the men were Germans with no context, with Welt, one of the most popular conservative papers in the country, running the headline “Five German vacationers on Mallorca have to be remanded in custody.” At no point in the piece does Welt mention the migration background of the suspects. The same story was told throughout the international press, with Associated Press, Deutsche Welle, and the Daily Mail making no mention of the men’s migration background. Heinsberg, 2025 A 17-year-old girl was lured by her ex-boyfriend to an apartment where five Syrian men between 17 and 26 were waiting. She was raped while threatened with a Taser. A pistol was also found during the subsequent search. The investigation later expanded to three separate rape cases after more victims came forward. Dresden gang rape, 2025 Three Syrian men allegedly raped a 27-year-old woman on the hood of a car in Dresden, with one of the defendants subsequently complaining about being assigned a female interpreter during proceedings. Herford, 2024 In 2024, a drugged 18-year-old was raped by seven suspects inside a parked vehicle in a fast food restaurant car park. The suspects included two Iraqi nationals — considered the main suspects — one German-Syrian, and four others with German citizenship (migration background unknown). The two Iraqis were remanded in custody. Police investigated the use of knockout drugs administered to the girl inside a nearby dance hall before the attack. Berlin, 2026 Just days after van Aken's podcast interview, a case made national headlines after it was revealed that nine suspects sexually assaulted and even raped a Turkish-Kurdish schoolgirl at the Gropiusstadt youth centre in Neukölln. Nine boys of Arab descent took turns molesting the same girl in a back room while one boy stood guard in the doorway. Instead of going to the authorities, staff kept quiet, reportedly to avoid having the young people immediately labeled “typical Muslims.“ These are just a small sampling of cases involving foreign nationals and gang rape.
0:45

🇩🇪🔴Fact Check: German far-left leader claims most high-profile gang rape suspects are all White men. “Let’s start with gang rape. So the most prominent cases we know of are all white men. Epstein, gang rape, Gisele Pelicot in France, gang rape, all by white men,” said Jan van Aken, the co-leader of the German Left Party. His claims about Gisele Pelicot being “gang raped” by “all by white men” is rated as FALSE. According to analysis of names in the case, 12 have a Middle Eastern/North African names plus the 3 names associated with sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific Islands. This means 27.5% of the 51 suspects are likely non-White. Not only is this far from “all” the suspects, but Middle Eastern and North Africans are estimated to be only 10% of the French population, which means they were significantly overrepresented in the rape of Pelicot. Regarding Epstein, while the charges in the case are reprehensible, nobody has been specifically convicted of gang rape in the case. There are numerous allegations that Prince Andrew committed gang rape but his case remains under investigation. The case involving Sean Diddy Combs, while not as prominent as the Epstein affair, also involved numerous allegations of gang rape as well, all involving African American suspects. Van Aken further states: “Gang rape exists, it’s a huge problem. But to pretend that this is a migration problem, I would put a big question mark over that.” The German statistics paint an entirely different story. Germany-wide, approximately 50% of all gang rape arrests involve foreign nationals, which predominately come from non-White regions like North Africa, the Middle East, and sub-Saharan African countries. Going further, if we examine only high-profile gang rape cases in Germany, it is clear that non-White suspects dominate. Cologne New Year’s Eve 2015/16 Approximately 2,000 men participated in mass sexual assaults on over 1,200 women across multiple German cities. The perpetrators were predominantly men from North Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia) and the Middle East who had recently arrived as part of the 2015 migrant wave. Many of the women were forcibly gang raped by large crowds of non-White males. The scale of the attacks and the initial reluctance of police and media to report on them caused a massive political storm and directly led to Germany rewriting its sexual assault laws in 2016 Freiburg 2018 An 18-year-old woman was drugged inside a discotheque by a 22-year-old Syrian Kurd and then raped outside the building by a series of men. Eight perpetrators were convicted — seven Syrians and one German — while two additional men were convicted for failing to aid the victim. The case intensified the national debate over migration and deportation of criminal asylum seekers.The defendants comprised one German citizen, eight Syrians, two Algerians and one Iraqi. The main suspect, a 22-year-old Syrian Kurd, was already the subject of unenforced arrest warrants for other crimes at the time of the attack. Emma S., 2019 A 15-year-old girl was lured into bushes on a September night and raped by 11 men, two of whom also filmed the attack in September 2019. Two of the named perpetrators, Arsen K. and Fares L., filmed the attack. Based on available reporting the group was predominantly of migrant background, consistent with the broader Freiburg-area cases of that period. Hamburg Stadtpark, 2020 Nine men and boys gang-raped a 15-year-old girl in a Hamburg park over several hours in September 2020. All were under 20 at the time, meaning they were subject to juvenile law. Only one — an Iranian national who was 19 at the time — spent any time in jail. The case later made headlines again when a 20-year-old woman was sentenced to a weekend in jail for calling one of the rapists a “disgraceful rapist pig” on WhatsApp — a harsher punishment than most of the perpetrators received. All nine convicted men reportedly hailed from Afghanistan, Armenia, Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Libya and Poland. Four of the defendants were German nationals, while four others held Armenian, Afghan, Kuwaiti and Montenegrin citizenship.. Only one, the Iranian national, received a prison sentence. Görlitzer Park, Berlin 2023 Three African men were charged with the rape, grievous bodily harm and aggravated robbery of a 27-year-old Georgian tourist. One of the suspects was a 21-year-old Somali man who had been traveling illegally in Germany since 2016 under eleven different identities. A second was a 22-year-old man from Guinea-Bissau said to have had four other identities and a criminal record across nine cases. Mallorca rape, 2023 In 2023, after the international media loudly trumpeted that five German men were arrested for raping an 18-year-old Spanish girl, it was quickly revealed that all of the men have a “migration background.” Nevertheless, the vast majority of news outlets referred to the men as “Germans” and most made no mention of the fact that the men had a migration background, with many outlets even referring to them as a “German pack.” While Spanish news outlet Ultima Hora reported that the 21- to 23-year-old suspects were of Turkish origin, much of the Spanish press was fixated on the “German” aspect of the crime, which the men allegedly filmed on their smartphones. Even the German press was quick to claim the men were Germans with no context, with Welt, one of the most popular conservative papers in the country, running the headline “Five German vacationers on Mallorca have to be remanded in custody.” At no point in the piece does Welt mention the migration background of the suspects. The same story was told throughout the international press, with Associated Press, Deutsche Welle, and the Daily Mail making no mention of the men’s migration background. Heinsberg, 2025 A 17-year-old girl was lured by her ex-boyfriend to an apartment where five Syrian men between 17 and 26 were waiting. She was raped while threatened with a Taser. A pistol was also found during the subsequent search. The investigation later expanded to three separate rape cases after more victims came forward. Dresden gang rape, 2025 Three Syrian men allegedly raped a 27-year-old woman on the hood of a car in Dresden, with one of the defendants subsequently complaining about being assigned a female interpreter during proceedings. Herford, 2024 In 2024, a drugged 18-year-old was raped by seven suspects inside a parked vehicle in a fast food restaurant car park. The suspects included two Iraqi nationals — considered the main suspects — one German-Syrian, and four others with German citizenship (migration background unknown). The two Iraqis were remanded in custody. Police investigated the use of knockout drugs administered to the girl inside a nearby dance hall before the attack. Berlin, 2026 Just days after van Aken's podcast interview, a case made national headlines after it was revealed that nine suspects sexually assaulted and even raped a Turkish-Kurdish schoolgirl at the Gropiusstadt youth centre in Neukölln. Nine boys of Arab descent took turns molesting the same girl in a back room while one boy stood guard in the doorway. Instead of going to the authorities, staff kept quiet, reportedly to avoid having the young people immediately labeled “typical Muslims.“ These are just a small sampling of cases involving foreign nationals and gang rape.

Remix News & Views

117,456 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨NHS junior doctor describes armed Palestinian fighters as 'heroes' as she faces second tribunal over 'antisemitic' outbursts This is crazy!! An NHS doctor facing claims of antisemitism and Holocaust denial openly called for Jihad on the streets of London and described armed Palestinian fighters as 'heroes'. Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, a trauma and orthopaedics doctor, has come under investigation over several 'dangerous' social media posts littered with praise for terrorist organisation Hamas and previously said she would 'never condemn' the October 7 attack. She also once described a hospital in north London as a 'Jewish supremacy cesspit'. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) ruled last month that no suspension was necessary because her posts did not amount to 'bullying or harassment'. But following criticism over the decision by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, the General Medical Council has referred the case back to the MPTS, with a new hearing set for October 23. Now footage has emerged of Dr Aladwan openly showing her support for Jihadist fighters, as one peer and former MP told Daily Mail the GMC must 'get a grip' and suspend her. The video was taken at a protest held outside the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in Whitehall on July 21, to coincide with a reported visit by Major General Tomer Bar, head of the Israeli Air Force. Speaking to dozens of protesters, who were flanked by Met Police officers, Dr Aladwan spoke about the five 'Palestinian principles of liberation'. One of them, she said, included 'armed resistance' and said those who participate in such activity are 'heroes'. Dr Aladwan said: 'The Palestinian people who are fighting for liberation, including armed struggle as per international law, [are] our heroes. Every single one of them. 'We are proud of our armed resistance and in Islam, we call that jihad. That's an honour. That's how you defend your people.' Elsewhere in her speech, Dr Aladwan referred to Israel as 'the terrorist entity' and said: 'It does not exist. It sits on top of Palestine and it must be dismantled.' In similar comments later, she addressed the crowd and said: 'For me, Palestine is the entirety of the map. Israel does not exist. And I can say that legally, I have my opinion.' Dr Aladwan's strong-held views, which are openly posted onto her social media accounts, have previously sparked controversy. This included a claim that 'British Jewish children are taught that they are superior to non-Jews, that they have the right to colonise Palestine, and are groomed through birthright trips to become colonisers'. On July 30, she claimed the Royal Free Hospital in north London, which serves a large Jewish community, was a 'Jewish supremacy cesspit'. And last month she sparked outrage after describing two gunmen involved in a fatal mass shooting in Jerusalem as 'two Palestinian martyrs'. Dr Aladwan made the comment to her more than 33,000 followers on X just hours after the frenzied attack took place and resulted in the deaths of six people, including a pregnant woman. Referring to the killings as a 'shooting operation', she wrote: 'This morning, the two Palestinian martyrs Muthanna Amro and Muhammad Taha bypassed the occupation's fortified checkpoints and carried out a shooting operation at a settlers' bus in the 'Ramot' settlement and killed 6 settlers. 'Palestine has never been safe for occupiers. Leave.' In other social media posts, Dr Aladwan described anti-Semitism and the Holocaust as 'concepts' used by Jewish people to 'promote a narrative of victimhood'. Following October 7 and Israel's military response to Hamas, her posts have included pictures of masked men holding rifles alongside fire emojis and a photo of a masked toddler wearing the trademark fluorescent green Hamas headband. She also shared a picture of a masked militant holding a large gun with the words: 'A picture of AlQasem a day keeps the Zs [Zionists] locked away', an apparent reference to the Al-Qassam brigade, the military wing of Hamas. Last night, concerned advocates called on the GMC to address the 'shameful state of affairs' and urged Met Police to investigate why Dr Aladwan was allowed to freely support armed Palestinian resistance in a public space. Alex Hearn from Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'How can any NHS patient - and especially Jewish patients - feel comfortable under her care? 'This dangerous doctor's open support for Jihadist terrorists who massacred 1,200 Israelis on October 7 and raped hundreds of young women at the Nova music festival means she must be immediately removed from duty and sacked. 'It is also very worrying that she made these remarks within earshot of police officers who did absolutely nothing. Her words were very clear. Why wasn't she arrested at the time? 'Dr Aladwan has made similar remarks in support of Hamas terrorists time and again on social media. 'We have been complaining to the police and General Medical Council for almost a year yet she remains free to work shifts in NHS hospitals. 'That is a shameful state of affairs that demands urgent action from the very top of government.' Lord Austin, the independent peer and former Labour MP, said: 'It is utterly disgraceful that this NHS doctor gave a speech saying she supported armed Palestinian terrorists and jihad in front of police officers and she was not arrested. 'The Met must answer for this failure and must now put it right by investigating this. 'Furthermore, I hope the GMC finally gets a grip and that she is struck off because NHS patients deserve to be protected from someone who holds these dangerous views.' Following the initial ruling to take no further action, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he had no faith in the medical regulator. 'The racist language of 'Jewish supremacy' reflects the values of Nazis, not the NHS,' he wrote on X. 'I fail to see how medics using such language with impunity doesn't undermine confidence in the medical profession. I have no confidence in our regulation system.' Last night, Met Police said in a statement it would review why there had been no intervention by officers at the time of the protest, as well as reviewing the material to 'establish whether any offences have been committed.' A spokesperson said: 'We can understand why the comments made in this video are a cause of significant concern. 'While the Crown Prosecution Service has previously determined that similar language used at protests did not cross the threshold into a criminal offence, each incident is specific and we would expect officers to intervene and take action so that an investigation can follow. 'We will be reviewing this incident to understand why that didn’t happen. 'Officers will also review the footage in its entirety to establish whether any offences have been committed, liaising with our CPS counterparts as necessary.'
0:32

🚨NHS junior doctor describes armed Palestinian fighters as 'heroes' as she faces second tribunal over 'antisemitic' outbursts This is crazy!! An NHS doctor facing claims of antisemitism and Holocaust denial openly called for Jihad on the streets of London and described armed Palestinian fighters as 'heroes'. Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, a trauma and orthopaedics doctor, has come under investigation over several 'dangerous' social media posts littered with praise for terrorist organisation Hamas and previously said she would 'never condemn' the October 7 attack. She also once described a hospital in north London as a 'Jewish supremacy cesspit'. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) ruled last month that no suspension was necessary because her posts did not amount to 'bullying or harassment'. But following criticism over the decision by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, the General Medical Council has referred the case back to the MPTS, with a new hearing set for October 23. Now footage has emerged of Dr Aladwan openly showing her support for Jihadist fighters, as one peer and former MP told Daily Mail the GMC must 'get a grip' and suspend her. The video was taken at a protest held outside the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in Whitehall on July 21, to coincide with a reported visit by Major General Tomer Bar, head of the Israeli Air Force. Speaking to dozens of protesters, who were flanked by Met Police officers, Dr Aladwan spoke about the five 'Palestinian principles of liberation'. One of them, she said, included 'armed resistance' and said those who participate in such activity are 'heroes'. Dr Aladwan said: 'The Palestinian people who are fighting for liberation, including armed struggle as per international law, [are] our heroes. Every single one of them. 'We are proud of our armed resistance and in Islam, we call that jihad. That's an honour. That's how you defend your people.' Elsewhere in her speech, Dr Aladwan referred to Israel as 'the terrorist entity' and said: 'It does not exist. It sits on top of Palestine and it must be dismantled.' In similar comments later, she addressed the crowd and said: 'For me, Palestine is the entirety of the map. Israel does not exist. And I can say that legally, I have my opinion.' Dr Aladwan's strong-held views, which are openly posted onto her social media accounts, have previously sparked controversy. This included a claim that 'British Jewish children are taught that they are superior to non-Jews, that they have the right to colonise Palestine, and are groomed through birthright trips to become colonisers'. On July 30, she claimed the Royal Free Hospital in north London, which serves a large Jewish community, was a 'Jewish supremacy cesspit'. And last month she sparked outrage after describing two gunmen involved in a fatal mass shooting in Jerusalem as 'two Palestinian martyrs'. Dr Aladwan made the comment to her more than 33,000 followers on X just hours after the frenzied attack took place and resulted in the deaths of six people, including a pregnant woman. Referring to the killings as a 'shooting operation', she wrote: 'This morning, the two Palestinian martyrs Muthanna Amro and Muhammad Taha bypassed the occupation's fortified checkpoints and carried out a shooting operation at a settlers' bus in the 'Ramot' settlement and killed 6 settlers. 'Palestine has never been safe for occupiers. Leave.' In other social media posts, Dr Aladwan described anti-Semitism and the Holocaust as 'concepts' used by Jewish people to 'promote a narrative of victimhood'. Following October 7 and Israel's military response to Hamas, her posts have included pictures of masked men holding rifles alongside fire emojis and a photo of a masked toddler wearing the trademark fluorescent green Hamas headband. She also shared a picture of a masked militant holding a large gun with the words: 'A picture of AlQasem a day keeps the Zs [Zionists] locked away', an apparent reference to the Al-Qassam brigade, the military wing of Hamas. Last night, concerned advocates called on the GMC to address the 'shameful state of affairs' and urged Met Police to investigate why Dr Aladwan was allowed to freely support armed Palestinian resistance in a public space. Alex Hearn from Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'How can any NHS patient - and especially Jewish patients - feel comfortable under her care? 'This dangerous doctor's open support for Jihadist terrorists who massacred 1,200 Israelis on October 7 and raped hundreds of young women at the Nova music festival means she must be immediately removed from duty and sacked. 'It is also very worrying that she made these remarks within earshot of police officers who did absolutely nothing. Her words were very clear. Why wasn't she arrested at the time? 'Dr Aladwan has made similar remarks in support of Hamas terrorists time and again on social media. 'We have been complaining to the police and General Medical Council for almost a year yet she remains free to work shifts in NHS hospitals. 'That is a shameful state of affairs that demands urgent action from the very top of government.' Lord Austin, the independent peer and former Labour MP, said: 'It is utterly disgraceful that this NHS doctor gave a speech saying she supported armed Palestinian terrorists and jihad in front of police officers and she was not arrested. 'The Met must answer for this failure and must now put it right by investigating this. 'Furthermore, I hope the GMC finally gets a grip and that she is struck off because NHS patients deserve to be protected from someone who holds these dangerous views.' Following the initial ruling to take no further action, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he had no faith in the medical regulator. 'The racist language of 'Jewish supremacy' reflects the values of Nazis, not the NHS,' he wrote on X. 'I fail to see how medics using such language with impunity doesn't undermine confidence in the medical profession. I have no confidence in our regulation system.' Last night, Met Police said in a statement it would review why there had been no intervention by officers at the time of the protest, as well as reviewing the material to 'establish whether any offences have been committed.' A spokesperson said: 'We can understand why the comments made in this video are a cause of significant concern. 'While the Crown Prosecution Service has previously determined that similar language used at protests did not cross the threshold into a criminal offence, each incident is specific and we would expect officers to intervene and take action so that an investigation can follow. 'We will be reviewing this incident to understand why that didn’t happen. 'Officers will also review the footage in its entirety to establish whether any offences have been committed, liaising with our CPS counterparts as necessary.'

Grifty

120,921 次观看 • 10 个月前

India's Vulgar Content Crisis: How Algorithms, Greed, and the Erosion of a Generation Are Colliding in 2026 In 2026, open any Indian teenager’s Instagram or YouTube Shorts feed and you’ll see it: a relentless stream of suggestive reels, borderline explicit dances, and creators pushing every boundary for clicks. What began as occasional “bold” content has now become the default algorithm diet for millions. This isn’t organic cultural evolution—it’s engineered addiction, fueled by cold, hard incentives that reward the raciest material while quietly reshaping an entire generation’s sense of normal. The Numbers Don’t Lie—And They’re Alarming Official data from the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal shows a staggering 76,657 complaints of cybercrimes against women in 2025 alone—an increase of over 28,000 cases from the previous year. Sexually obscene material topped the list with 37,743 reports, followed closely by sexually explicit acts. At the same time, the government has issued repeated advisories to platforms demanding immediate removal of “obscene, vulgar, pornographic” content, warning of legal consequences for non-compliance. Yet the flood continues. Why? Because the system is designed to reward it. The Algorithm’s Poisonous Incentive Loop Social media platforms don’t care about culture—they care about watch time, comments, shares, and subscriptions. Provocative, sexually charged content consistently outperforms everything else: - Reels with “bold” hooks get 2–3x more watch time. - Controversial or suggestive posts trigger 4x more comments and shares. - Once a creator dips into semi-nude, twerking, or heavily sexualized fitness/glamour content, the algorithm pushes it harder—because engagement skyrockets. Creators aren’t stupid. Many started with dance, fashion, or comedy. Then they noticed the pattern: a slightly suggestive thumbnail or outfit = exponential growth. Instagram’s subscription model (where fans pay monthly for “exclusive” content) has turned this into a direct revenue stream. The more explicit the tease, the more subscribers pay to see what’s behind the paywall. It’s not art. It’s calculated escalation. Meanwhile, young viewers—especially impressionable teens—are being trained from their first scroll. The hyper-sexualization of children and teens on these platforms is no longer fringe; it’s algorithmic mainstream. Algorithms actively promote self-sexualized content from users as young as 12 because it drives insane engagement metrics. The Hidden Cultural and Psychological Cost This isn’t harmless entertainment. Constant exposure to vulgar, objectifying content is rewiring expectations: - Relationships become transactional and appearance-obsessed. - Body image issues explode among both boys and girls. - Respect, consent, and emotional depth take a backseat to shock value and dopamine hits. - A generation is learning that the fastest path to fame and money is self-objectification. India’s rich cultural heritage—rooted in restraint, family values, and spiritual depth—is being drowned out by a globalized, profit-driven race to the bottom. The same platforms that once promised connection and creativity are now the biggest distributors of cultural decay. It’s Not Just Creators—It’s Us Here’s the uncomfortable truth: every view, like, share, and subscription is a vote. We are the demand side of this supply chain. When we reward vulgarity, platforms and creators respond with more of it. The algorithm doesn’t have morals—it has metrics. We do. What Needs to Change—Now 1. Platforms must be held accountable. The government’s recent push for faster takedowns (now down to hours in some cases) and age-based classification of digital content is a start. But enforcement must be consistent and transparent. 2. Creators must choose integrity over virality. Real influence comes from substance, not skin. 3. Parents and educators need to wake up and actively monitor, discuss, and limit exposure. 4. Users must vote with their thumbs—follow, share, and pay for content that elevates rather than degrades. The sudden rise of vulgar content in India isn’t accidental. It’s the predictable outcome of unchecked algorithms meeting human greed in a hyper-connected society. If we don’t interrupt this cycle now, we won’t just lose our feeds—we’ll lose the values that define us as a civilization. The question isn’t whether this content exists. The question is: what kind of India are we building—one scroll at a time? What do you think—have you noticed this shift in your own feed? Drop your thoughts below. Let’s start the conversation that actually matters.
16:12

India's Vulgar Content Crisis: How Algorithms, Greed, and the Erosion of a Generation Are Colliding in 2026 In 2026, open any Indian teenager’s Instagram or YouTube Shorts feed and you’ll see it: a relentless stream of suggestive reels, borderline explicit dances, and creators pushing every boundary for clicks. What began as occasional “bold” content has now become the default algorithm diet for millions. This isn’t organic cultural evolution—it’s engineered addiction, fueled by cold, hard incentives that reward the raciest material while quietly reshaping an entire generation’s sense of normal. The Numbers Don’t Lie—And They’re Alarming Official data from the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal shows a staggering 76,657 complaints of cybercrimes against women in 2025 alone—an increase of over 28,000 cases from the previous year. Sexually obscene material topped the list with 37,743 reports, followed closely by sexually explicit acts. At the same time, the government has issued repeated advisories to platforms demanding immediate removal of “obscene, vulgar, pornographic” content, warning of legal consequences for non-compliance. Yet the flood continues. Why? Because the system is designed to reward it. The Algorithm’s Poisonous Incentive Loop Social media platforms don’t care about culture—they care about watch time, comments, shares, and subscriptions. Provocative, sexually charged content consistently outperforms everything else: - Reels with “bold” hooks get 2–3x more watch time. - Controversial or suggestive posts trigger 4x more comments and shares. - Once a creator dips into semi-nude, twerking, or heavily sexualized fitness/glamour content, the algorithm pushes it harder—because engagement skyrockets. Creators aren’t stupid. Many started with dance, fashion, or comedy. Then they noticed the pattern: a slightly suggestive thumbnail or outfit = exponential growth. Instagram’s subscription model (where fans pay monthly for “exclusive” content) has turned this into a direct revenue stream. The more explicit the tease, the more subscribers pay to see what’s behind the paywall. It’s not art. It’s calculated escalation. Meanwhile, young viewers—especially impressionable teens—are being trained from their first scroll. The hyper-sexualization of children and teens on these platforms is no longer fringe; it’s algorithmic mainstream. Algorithms actively promote self-sexualized content from users as young as 12 because it drives insane engagement metrics. The Hidden Cultural and Psychological Cost This isn’t harmless entertainment. Constant exposure to vulgar, objectifying content is rewiring expectations: - Relationships become transactional and appearance-obsessed. - Body image issues explode among both boys and girls. - Respect, consent, and emotional depth take a backseat to shock value and dopamine hits. - A generation is learning that the fastest path to fame and money is self-objectification. India’s rich cultural heritage—rooted in restraint, family values, and spiritual depth—is being drowned out by a globalized, profit-driven race to the bottom. The same platforms that once promised connection and creativity are now the biggest distributors of cultural decay. It’s Not Just Creators—It’s Us Here’s the uncomfortable truth: every view, like, share, and subscription is a vote. We are the demand side of this supply chain. When we reward vulgarity, platforms and creators respond with more of it. The algorithm doesn’t have morals—it has metrics. We do. What Needs to Change—Now 1. Platforms must be held accountable. The government’s recent push for faster takedowns (now down to hours in some cases) and age-based classification of digital content is a start. But enforcement must be consistent and transparent. 2. Creators must choose integrity over virality. Real influence comes from substance, not skin. 3. Parents and educators need to wake up and actively monitor, discuss, and limit exposure. 4. Users must vote with their thumbs—follow, share, and pay for content that elevates rather than degrades. The sudden rise of vulgar content in India isn’t accidental. It’s the predictable outcome of unchecked algorithms meeting human greed in a hyper-connected society. If we don’t interrupt this cycle now, we won’t just lose our feeds—we’ll lose the values that define us as a civilization. The question isn’t whether this content exists. The question is: what kind of India are we building—one scroll at a time? What do you think—have you noticed this shift in your own feed? Drop your thoughts below. Let’s start the conversation that actually matters.

MOHINI WEALTH (NRI)

520,236 次观看 • 3 个月前