正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨EXPOSED: Hunter Kozak PANICS ON CAMERA –He Accidentally Names the False-Flag Unit That CONSPIRED To Take Out Charlie Kirk?! Rewatch Hunter Kozak's Sept 12, 2025, Channel 5 interview with Andrew Callaghan (the liberal troll of Charlie Kirk who followed him around from campus to campus working with streamer Destiny's...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

250,039 subscribers

200,027 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨HUGE NEWS: After working on this behind the scenes for awhile now, we are excited to announce that EVERY EPISODE of The Charlie Kirk Show is now available. You asked, we delivered. From the first few episodes in May 2019 where it was just me and CK with a mic and a Zoom recorder to our first interview with Don Jr., through the 2020 election and into 2024 and the Trump transition, listen to all of your favorite Charlie episodes at your leisure. This took some doing, so please take advantage of the CK back catalogue. Charlie will never be forgotten.
1:50

🚨HUGE NEWS: After working on this behind the scenes for awhile now, we are excited to announce that EVERY EPISODE of The Charlie Kirk Show is now available. You asked, we delivered. From the first few episodes in May 2019 where it was just me and CK with a mic and a Zoom recorder to our first interview with Don Jr., through the 2020 election and into 2024 and the Trump transition, listen to all of your favorite Charlie episodes at your leisure. This took some doing, so please take advantage of the CK back catalogue. Charlie will never be forgotten.

Andrew Kolvet

338,404 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨FOLLOW-UP: Jason Chaffetz Just Dropped a CRITICAL Detail About “Microphone Problems” at UVU — Right BEFORE Charlie Kirk Was Killed🤔 In one of the earliest interviews after the assassination, Jason Chaffetz (who was there that day) described the scene: “Charlie came out… they were having a little bit of a microphone problem. But everybody was chanting USA or Charlie Kirk… they were genuinely excited to see him.” What microphone problems? Was it the Rode wireless lapel mic Charlie was wearing? Or the handheld microphone he was gripping the moment of the “bang”? Because here’s what we already know from the evidence I posted yesterday: Dark marks/burn-like injuries on Charlie’s left hand (the one holding the mic) in both the UVU stills and the casket photo. Tiny black shards scattered under the tent and found inside the SUV that rushed him to the hospital — consistent with the material used in Rode wireless lapel mics and receivers. The audio tech visibly flinching before the big bang. Terryl Farnsworth immediately ripping the camera down, removing the SD cards, and tampering with evidence within minutes. Now add Chaffetz confirming microphone problems that day. This lines up disturbingly well with the theory that Charlie was taken out by an exploding microphone pack — similar to the PETN-rigged pager attacks Israel used on Hamas. Small charge. Remote detonation. Minimal visible residue. Maximum lethality. If they were already having mic issues that morning, it raises the obvious question: Was the mic tampered with? Was the problem the setup for the kill shot? TPUSA owes the public — and Charlie’s family — full transparency. What exactly were these “microphone problems”? Which mic was affected? Why has no one explained this? We’re not letting this go. The American people deserve answers. If you have any info on the AV setup that day, the mics used, or what Chaffetz meant, DM me immediately. Full anonymity guaranteed. RT this. Tag Turning Point USA. Tag Candace Owens Baron Coleman The more pressure we apply, the harder it is for them to hide.
0:25

🚨FOLLOW-UP: Jason Chaffetz Just Dropped a CRITICAL Detail About “Microphone Problems” at UVU — Right BEFORE Charlie Kirk Was Killed🤔 In one of the earliest interviews after the assassination, Jason Chaffetz (who was there that day) described the scene: “Charlie came out… they were having a little bit of a microphone problem. But everybody was chanting USA or Charlie Kirk… they were genuinely excited to see him.” What microphone problems? Was it the Rode wireless lapel mic Charlie was wearing? Or the handheld microphone he was gripping the moment of the “bang”? Because here’s what we already know from the evidence I posted yesterday: Dark marks/burn-like injuries on Charlie’s left hand (the one holding the mic) in both the UVU stills and the casket photo. Tiny black shards scattered under the tent and found inside the SUV that rushed him to the hospital — consistent with the material used in Rode wireless lapel mics and receivers. The audio tech visibly flinching before the big bang. Terryl Farnsworth immediately ripping the camera down, removing the SD cards, and tampering with evidence within minutes. Now add Chaffetz confirming microphone problems that day. This lines up disturbingly well with the theory that Charlie was taken out by an exploding microphone pack — similar to the PETN-rigged pager attacks Israel used on Hamas. Small charge. Remote detonation. Minimal visible residue. Maximum lethality. If they were already having mic issues that morning, it raises the obvious question: Was the mic tampered with? Was the problem the setup for the kill shot? TPUSA owes the public — and Charlie’s family — full transparency. What exactly were these “microphone problems”? Which mic was affected? Why has no one explained this? We’re not letting this go. The American people deserve answers. If you have any info on the AV setup that day, the mics used, or what Chaffetz meant, DM me immediately. Full anonymity guaranteed. RT this. Tag Turning Point USA. Tag Candace Owens Baron Coleman The more pressure we apply, the harder it is for them to hide.

Project Constitution

242,611 次观看 • 5 个月前

Candace Owens received the information about the text about Charlie Kirk saying that, "They were going to kill him," directly from Andrew Kolvet weeks ago. Charlie Kirk also texted Dan Flood, the day before he was assassinated on Sept. 9th, that said, "They are going to kill me tomorrow." Dan Flood was his security guard who was standing near him all the time with the smart glasses and the one that made the suspicious arm signal right before Charlie was shot. This is alleged to have taken place right after or near the time of the meeting with the donors that were allegedly trying to bribe him or were happy about him leaving specific foreign causes and having certain people at TPUSA events to speak. Josh Hammer also posted on X at the time right after that alleged meeting with the donors about a "public execution" out of nowhere, which coincidentally ties into around the same time Charlie would of texted Dan about him be killed the next day. Why is Erika now saying that Charlie never said that, when we know for a fact that he did? Now do you understand why this story isn't making any sense and the continuous back and forth lies and cover-ups? This is exactly why people don't believe and know that there is something extremely shady going on with this entire organization and the people in it. Stop being so naive, pay attention. The TRUTH will ALWAYS PREVAIL. Candace Owens
1:32

Candace Owens received the information about the text about Charlie Kirk saying that, "They were going to kill him," directly from Andrew Kolvet weeks ago. Charlie Kirk also texted Dan Flood, the day before he was assassinated on Sept. 9th, that said, "They are going to kill me tomorrow." Dan Flood was his security guard who was standing near him all the time with the smart glasses and the one that made the suspicious arm signal right before Charlie was shot. This is alleged to have taken place right after or near the time of the meeting with the donors that were allegedly trying to bribe him or were happy about him leaving specific foreign causes and having certain people at TPUSA events to speak. Josh Hammer also posted on X at the time right after that alleged meeting with the donors about a "public execution" out of nowhere, which coincidentally ties into around the same time Charlie would of texted Dan about him be killed the next day. Why is Erika now saying that Charlie never said that, when we know for a fact that he did? Now do you understand why this story isn't making any sense and the continuous back and forth lies and cover-ups? This is exactly why people don't believe and know that there is something extremely shady going on with this entire organization and the people in it. Stop being so naive, pay attention. The TRUTH will ALWAYS PREVAIL. Candace Owens

The SCIF

124,294 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨BOMBSHELL: PROOF Dan Flood Was INJURED by Shrapnel From SAME Exploding Mic Blast That Killed Charlie Kirk —COVER-UP Exposed! 💥😱 Unearthed clip DROPS hard evidence: Close-up on Dan Flood's left forearm shows BRUISE & TINY BLACK SHARDS embedded in his forearm (shrapnel from mic explosion—NOT a gunshot.) His watch GLASS CRACKED & destroyed from the blast. Shrapnel EVERYWHERE – on the table in front of Charlie, and in the SUV (as Candace revealed)! Why change clothes at the hospital? Because they were hiding EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE! Dan KNEW it was an explosion because it hit HIM too – but pushes the "magic 30.06 bullet" fed narrative? Why stay SILENT? This is BOMBSHELL proof that Implicates him in the assassination setup! This SCREAMS larger conspiracy – mic rigged, fail-safes, cleanup. Wake up! 👀 FOLLOW My Bro Ali Zreik Who has been doing a great job researching and breaking down the events of that day frame by frame. Tag Candace Owens and RT to expose the TRUTH!
18:29

🚨BOMBSHELL: PROOF Dan Flood Was INJURED by Shrapnel From SAME Exploding Mic Blast That Killed Charlie Kirk —COVER-UP Exposed! 💥😱 Unearthed clip DROPS hard evidence: Close-up on Dan Flood's left forearm shows BRUISE & TINY BLACK SHARDS embedded in his forearm (shrapnel from mic explosion—NOT a gunshot.) His watch GLASS CRACKED & destroyed from the blast. Shrapnel EVERYWHERE – on the table in front of Charlie, and in the SUV (as Candace revealed)! Why change clothes at the hospital? Because they were hiding EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE! Dan KNEW it was an explosion because it hit HIM too – but pushes the "magic 30.06 bullet" fed narrative? Why stay SILENT? This is BOMBSHELL proof that Implicates him in the assassination setup! This SCREAMS larger conspiracy – mic rigged, fail-safes, cleanup. Wake up! 👀 FOLLOW My Bro Ali Zreik Who has been doing a great job researching and breaking down the events of that day frame by frame. Tag Candace Owens and RT to expose the TRUTH!

Project Constitution

317,637 次观看 • 7 个月前

📢 BREAKING: New Evidence Discovered To FREE Tyler Robinson IMMEDIATELY!! 🚫💥🎤 NO EXPLODING MIC!! Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 has been completed for 6+ months and has existed for 9+ months. The top podcasters, quite a few CK commentators, and a bunch of the Charlie Kirk investigators know my work, however...... My 8-hour five-part series is extremely scary to most people. They are afraid to tell you of what really happened. Afraid, because they probably feel like this is unstoppable. And they would be right. But it doesn't mean that we should throw away our responsibility to say and do what is right regarding the death of Charlie Kirk. We don't get to be afraid when the Constitution of the United States of America is on the line for our children and their children. We don't get to be passive and quiet when our government uses advanced technology to assassinate one of its own. I am still the only Charlie Kirk independent investigator who is covered the fact that Charlie Kirk was a government employee with his security clearance when he was assassinated. Most people don't know, and this is another story that I broke, that Charlie struck up his own contract with the Chinese/TikTok well before Israel could get a foot in the door. In fact, Charlie explicitly struck up his own deal with TikTok so that he could cut Israel out of the distribution of his message. I am still the only Charlie Kirk investigator to cover this important information. When you combine the fact that he was a government employee with the security clearance, working for the military at the USAF BoV, and now striking up his own deal with China to snub Israel? That sounds like motive for both governments to assassinate Charlie Kirk... And that is exactly what they did. And then they purchased TikTok. And all of the things that Charlie Kirk refused to do, Erika Kirk made sure to reverse course and give Israel exactly what they wanted... Turning Point USA, now known as AIPAC Jr. Israel and the United States of America had more motive to kill Charlie Kirk than Tyler Robinson did. They also had more assets in the area than Tyler Robinson did. The US Army spy plane specialty-equipped with launched effects for the deployment of drones... This spy plane dipped down to 200ft before and after the Charlie Kirk assassination. 200ft is the perfect height to deploy and pick up drones in an Army spy plane specifically equipped to do just that. This is just part one of three videos that I am going to put out tonight... Once you see this video, you cannot unsee it. Once you know the infrared beam was on the back of Charlie's head, and you can see that it was the back right side of his head, the discussion of whether he was shot in the back of the head is over with. Charlie Kirk was absolutely shot in the back of the head. Charlie Kirk operation 322 shows you exactly how this ritual assassination unfolded in exactly who was responsible that day. The series also gets into the why, which if you're into the esoteric information, the ties to the Epstein class are undeniable for Erika Kirk. Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 is the only series that ties Erika Kirk directly to Israel's Elbit Systems, the defense contractor that killed her husband with the Bird of Prey drone platform, while she was in New York doing real estate. 🔑 While she was getting her license and likely managing apartments for models, Israel's Elbit Systems was charged that same year for funneling money through the United States of America to Romania for a real estate project and its consultants. This is information that I broke in Charlie Kirk: Operation 322. That is the only place you will find it on the internet. Charlie Kirk was subverted by everybody around him. Two simultaneous shots took Charlie Kirk's life prematurely. Let's use this information to get Tyler Robinson out of prison. 🔑 Stay tuned for the next video for the SHOT TO THE TORSO... #FreeTylerRobinson
9:58

📢 BREAKING: New Evidence Discovered To FREE Tyler Robinson IMMEDIATELY!! 🚫💥🎤 NO EXPLODING MIC!! Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 has been completed for 6+ months and has existed for 9+ months. The top podcasters, quite a few CK commentators, and a bunch of the Charlie Kirk investigators know my work, however...... My 8-hour five-part series is extremely scary to most people. They are afraid to tell you of what really happened. Afraid, because they probably feel like this is unstoppable. And they would be right. But it doesn't mean that we should throw away our responsibility to say and do what is right regarding the death of Charlie Kirk. We don't get to be afraid when the Constitution of the United States of America is on the line for our children and their children. We don't get to be passive and quiet when our government uses advanced technology to assassinate one of its own. I am still the only Charlie Kirk independent investigator who is covered the fact that Charlie Kirk was a government employee with his security clearance when he was assassinated. Most people don't know, and this is another story that I broke, that Charlie struck up his own contract with the Chinese/TikTok well before Israel could get a foot in the door. In fact, Charlie explicitly struck up his own deal with TikTok so that he could cut Israel out of the distribution of his message. I am still the only Charlie Kirk investigator to cover this important information. When you combine the fact that he was a government employee with the security clearance, working for the military at the USAF BoV, and now striking up his own deal with China to snub Israel? That sounds like motive for both governments to assassinate Charlie Kirk... And that is exactly what they did. And then they purchased TikTok. And all of the things that Charlie Kirk refused to do, Erika Kirk made sure to reverse course and give Israel exactly what they wanted... Turning Point USA, now known as AIPAC Jr. Israel and the United States of America had more motive to kill Charlie Kirk than Tyler Robinson did. They also had more assets in the area than Tyler Robinson did. The US Army spy plane specialty-equipped with launched effects for the deployment of drones... This spy plane dipped down to 200ft before and after the Charlie Kirk assassination. 200ft is the perfect height to deploy and pick up drones in an Army spy plane specifically equipped to do just that. This is just part one of three videos that I am going to put out tonight... Once you see this video, you cannot unsee it. Once you know the infrared beam was on the back of Charlie's head, and you can see that it was the back right side of his head, the discussion of whether he was shot in the back of the head is over with. Charlie Kirk was absolutely shot in the back of the head. Charlie Kirk operation 322 shows you exactly how this ritual assassination unfolded in exactly who was responsible that day. The series also gets into the why, which if you're into the esoteric information, the ties to the Epstein class are undeniable for Erika Kirk. Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 is the only series that ties Erika Kirk directly to Israel's Elbit Systems, the defense contractor that killed her husband with the Bird of Prey drone platform, while she was in New York doing real estate. 🔑 While she was getting her license and likely managing apartments for models, Israel's Elbit Systems was charged that same year for funneling money through the United States of America to Romania for a real estate project and its consultants. This is information that I broke in Charlie Kirk: Operation 322. That is the only place you will find it on the internet. Charlie Kirk was subverted by everybody around him. Two simultaneous shots took Charlie Kirk's life prematurely. Let's use this information to get Tyler Robinson out of prison. 🔑 Stay tuned for the next video for the SHOT TO THE TORSO... #FreeTylerRobinson

WeAreNotGoingToMars

391,710 次观看 • 1 个月前

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens
5:29

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

203,389 次观看 • 9 个月前

🤔 The rifle drop location of the leftist who assassinated Charlie Kirk has been revealed. From the video which cuts off…we can see him waiting at the intersection. So not to be semantical but the diagram showing him cut across the parking lot isn’t accurate because he walks along the pathway. So it appears Tyler Robinson walked across the street and “HID” the Mauser in that vicinity and then walked to his car. My only question is if he knew in his own words that his father would notice the gun missing and have to come back to collect it WHY NOT JUST TAKE IT WITH YOU TO YOUR VEHICLE AND REMOVE THAT FROM THE EQUATION? He seemed to smuggle the weapon in there with NO PROBLEM hidden well enough and with all the commotion getting back to your car with the weapon would be a priority. We have heard routinely that he is NOT a stupid person so he would know that after committing the most high profile ASSASSINATION in the 21st century w/ cameras everywhere of a personal friend of The President that no stone would be unturned. So DID HE REALLY THINK HE WOULD BE ABLE TO RETURN TO A CAMPUS THAT WOULD BE ON LOCKDOWN HOURS LATER TO RETRIEVE IT? That doesn’t sound like a MENSA move to me. I’ll leave my post here also from 9/12 when his father turned him in where I said AT BARE MINIMUM HE WOULD HAVE KNOWN HIS DAD WOULD KNOW ITS MISSING. Why use the terminology “DROP POINT” as if it’s an OP as opposed to saying “I hid or stashed it”? Just little details like that stand out to me. Take it with you at this point don’t drop it a hundred feet away from a crime of the century.
0:31

🤔 The rifle drop location of the leftist who assassinated Charlie Kirk has been revealed. From the video which cuts off…we can see him waiting at the intersection. So not to be semantical but the diagram showing him cut across the parking lot isn’t accurate because he walks along the pathway. So it appears Tyler Robinson walked across the street and “HID” the Mauser in that vicinity and then walked to his car. My only question is if he knew in his own words that his father would notice the gun missing and have to come back to collect it WHY NOT JUST TAKE IT WITH YOU TO YOUR VEHICLE AND REMOVE THAT FROM THE EQUATION? He seemed to smuggle the weapon in there with NO PROBLEM hidden well enough and with all the commotion getting back to your car with the weapon would be a priority. We have heard routinely that he is NOT a stupid person so he would know that after committing the most high profile ASSASSINATION in the 21st century w/ cameras everywhere of a personal friend of The President that no stone would be unturned. So DID HE REALLY THINK HE WOULD BE ABLE TO RETURN TO A CAMPUS THAT WOULD BE ON LOCKDOWN HOURS LATER TO RETRIEVE IT? That doesn’t sound like a MENSA move to me. I’ll leave my post here also from 9/12 when his father turned him in where I said AT BARE MINIMUM HE WOULD HAVE KNOWN HIS DAD WOULD KNOW ITS MISSING. Why use the terminology “DROP POINT” as if it’s an OP as opposed to saying “I hid or stashed it”? Just little details like that stand out to me. Take it with you at this point don’t drop it a hundred feet away from a crime of the century.

Johnny St.Pete

45,016 次观看 • 10 个月前

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens
12:27

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

146,753 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Caught RIGGING THE Q & A Event At GW University This Week - Student Says 3 Of Out The Person's Were PLANTED And Questions Were STAGED!😱 If you needed any more proof that Erika Kirk has completely abandoned the principles Charlie Kirk built his life on, here is the smoking gun. A student who just attended the Turning Point USA event at GW University featuring Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt just did an interview blowing the whistle on the entire operation. According to the students on the ground, the "Free Speech" event was a carefully orchestrated, heavily censored theater production. According to the student in the clip: The "Plants": At least 3 out of the 4 people who got to ask questions during the Q&A were literally affiliated with the event/organization. They were planted there. Not Even Students: Half of the people hand-picked to ask questions weren't even actual GW students! The Cut-Off: The organizers rigged the line so their "plants" could ask soft-ball, pro-administration questions. Then, the absolute second an actual student with a dissenting opinion stepped up to the mic, they magically "ran out of time" and shut the entire thing down. Because they can’t handle the heat. This student said it best: He respected Charlie because Charlie actually valued freedom of speech and talked to people who disagreed with him. This new regime is just creating a safe space bubble to protect themselves from real questions—like, perhaps, questions about the investigation into Charlie's death? Charlie Kirk built his entire legacy on the "Prove Me Wrong" table. He was fearless. He wanted to debate the other side, and he never backed down from a tough question from a hostile student. The "New" TPUSA? They are terrified of unscripted moments. The students are waking up. The movement sees right through the facade. Watch the clip for yourself. What happened to the fearless TPUSA we used to know? 👇 From: CALL TO ACTIVISM FOLLOW Them!
1:28

🚨 EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Caught RIGGING THE Q & A Event At GW University This Week - Student Says 3 Of Out The Person's Were PLANTED And Questions Were STAGED!😱 If you needed any more proof that Erika Kirk has completely abandoned the principles Charlie Kirk built his life on, here is the smoking gun. A student who just attended the Turning Point USA event at GW University featuring Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt just did an interview blowing the whistle on the entire operation. According to the students on the ground, the "Free Speech" event was a carefully orchestrated, heavily censored theater production. According to the student in the clip: The "Plants": At least 3 out of the 4 people who got to ask questions during the Q&A were literally affiliated with the event/organization. They were planted there. Not Even Students: Half of the people hand-picked to ask questions weren't even actual GW students! The Cut-Off: The organizers rigged the line so their "plants" could ask soft-ball, pro-administration questions. Then, the absolute second an actual student with a dissenting opinion stepped up to the mic, they magically "ran out of time" and shut the entire thing down. Because they can’t handle the heat. This student said it best: He respected Charlie because Charlie actually valued freedom of speech and talked to people who disagreed with him. This new regime is just creating a safe space bubble to protect themselves from real questions—like, perhaps, questions about the investigation into Charlie's death? Charlie Kirk built his entire legacy on the "Prove Me Wrong" table. He was fearless. He wanted to debate the other side, and he never backed down from a tough question from a hostile student. The "New" TPUSA? They are terrified of unscripted moments. The students are waking up. The movement sees right through the facade. Watch the clip for yourself. What happened to the fearless TPUSA we used to know? 👇 From: CALL TO ACTIVISM FOLLOW Them!

Project Constitution

307,036 次观看 • 4 个月前

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump
2:29

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump

NewsTreason Channel 17

17,130 次观看 • 1 年前

What the hell do we do now? Where do we go from here? What happens next? Who is supposed to pick up the microphone? No one will ever be able to fill Charlie’s shoes. No one. But I can’t think of anything that would fill his heart and make him prouder than the generation he inspired to pick up the torch and carry it forward. To continue this mission he gave his life for to speak the truth and to fight against evil, to fill the hearts of the world with courage and the love of God. This is the Turning Point of our time. I don’t even know if Charlie intended for that name to pack such a punch, and maybe it seems even more important now, but amid the expected and disgusting hate comments in the wake of Charlie’s death, I am floored and inspired all over again by the thousands of posts I’ve seen from our generation saying that this is their personal awakening to get in the arena, to be on the frontlines of this culture war, and to speak out in courage no matter what the backlash that comes next might look like. And I guess that’s the answer. Who picks up the microphone from here? Who keeps speaking the truth when the world needs it the most? Who keeps pushing back against evil? YOU. You do. We do. Charlie always believed this - that anyone from anywhere can inspire the world if they just have the courage to do it. I have to believe that Charlie lit the spark that will spark a wildfire in this movement. A movement not just to fix our political system or revive the American Dream, but so much bigger. To change culture. To seek and speak truth. To love God authentically and share that love with the world. To transform humanity as Salt and Light through every action we take. For you, Charlie. Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA TPUSA Students
2:09

What the hell do we do now? Where do we go from here? What happens next? Who is supposed to pick up the microphone? No one will ever be able to fill Charlie’s shoes. No one. But I can’t think of anything that would fill his heart and make him prouder than the generation he inspired to pick up the torch and carry it forward. To continue this mission he gave his life for to speak the truth and to fight against evil, to fill the hearts of the world with courage and the love of God. This is the Turning Point of our time. I don’t even know if Charlie intended for that name to pack such a punch, and maybe it seems even more important now, but amid the expected and disgusting hate comments in the wake of Charlie’s death, I am floored and inspired all over again by the thousands of posts I’ve seen from our generation saying that this is their personal awakening to get in the arena, to be on the frontlines of this culture war, and to speak out in courage no matter what the backlash that comes next might look like. And I guess that’s the answer. Who picks up the microphone from here? Who keeps speaking the truth when the world needs it the most? Who keeps pushing back against evil? YOU. You do. We do. Charlie always believed this - that anyone from anywhere can inspire the world if they just have the courage to do it. I have to believe that Charlie lit the spark that will spark a wildfire in this movement. A movement not just to fix our political system or revive the American Dream, but so much bigger. To change culture. To seek and speak truth. To love God authentically and share that love with the world. To transform humanity as Salt and Light through every action we take. For you, Charlie. Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA TPUSA Students

Isabel Brown

1,315,380 次观看 • 11 个月前

American Sheriff Who Exposed Illegal Immigrants Receiving Cell Phones, Plane Tickets, Cash etc Says The Media Attacked Him & Accused Him Of Putting Out False Information Now He’s Back With Receipts & PROOF The United Nations Is Funding The Illegal Immigrant Invasion & Providing Exactly What He Originally Exposed “Remember about a month ago, I put out a video saying that when many of these illegals are getting processed or people claiming asylum, they're getting a cell phone. They're getting a plane ticket across this country, and then even getting gift cards. Some of them even getting cash. Well, the media went to work really fast to try to debunk me and say that I was putting out false information. Verify, said it was false information. Well, this is just one of the reports we've seen recently. Now the UN is saying that they were handing out up to $1,600,000,000 through NGOs to illegal immigrants for things like gift cards and cash. Gift cards like this. We find these all over on the other side of the border and on our side of the border, and we find them with the folks that we pull over and stop that have come into this country illegally. So once again, I'm here to remind you that the information that the mainstream media feeds you is what's false.”
0:59

American Sheriff Who Exposed Illegal Immigrants Receiving Cell Phones, Plane Tickets, Cash etc Says The Media Attacked Him & Accused Him Of Putting Out False Information Now He’s Back With Receipts & PROOF The United Nations Is Funding The Illegal Immigrant Invasion & Providing Exactly What He Originally Exposed “Remember about a month ago, I put out a video saying that when many of these illegals are getting processed or people claiming asylum, they're getting a cell phone. They're getting a plane ticket across this country, and then even getting gift cards. Some of them even getting cash. Well, the media went to work really fast to try to debunk me and say that I was putting out false information. Verify, said it was false information. Well, this is just one of the reports we've seen recently. Now the UN is saying that they were handing out up to $1,600,000,000 through NGOs to illegal immigrants for things like gift cards and cash. Gift cards like this. We find these all over on the other side of the border and on our side of the border, and we find them with the folks that we pull over and stop that have come into this country illegally. So once again, I'm here to remind you that the information that the mainstream media feeds you is what's false.”

Wall Street Apes

564,039 次观看 • 2 年前

CHARLIE KIRK SMOKING GUNS Amongst the litany of lies & contradictions emanating from the "approved" Charlie Kirk ass*ssination narrative, there are 2 major "smoking guns". 🔖▶️ 🔊 1. Tyler Robinson was in custody & mirandized an hour and a half before the alleged Discord confession was posted, and 3 hours before public officials claim he was captured. CONVENIENTLY, Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby, along with the sheriff's office video camera footage, have been disappeared. 2. Either the Rode mic or receiver is lying in shards all over the seats & floor of the SUV. CONVENIENTLY, the mic/receiver & associated audio, along with the SUV, have been disappeared. ******* The shattered mic/receiver is more devastating, here's why: In the case of the alleged Discord confession, their plan seems to be to simply not introduce it into evidence. It's just being used to convict Tyler in the court of public opinion. Whether it's real or fake, the narrative that Tyler shot Charlie can still be true. In the case of the shattered mic, it transforms the fundamental fabric of the narrative: Tyler Robinson did NOT shoot Charlie Kirk. And then everything falls apart. ******* Together, these two smoking guns indicate the scope of the conspiracy: TPUSA doesn't itself have the power to frame Tyler Robinson, scuttle sheriff's office video, dispose of the SUV, or order the crime scene to be excavated to a depth of 10 inches & paved over. The state of Utah doesn't have the power to stop the FBI & federal government from pursuing the evidence and investigating any potential interstate plot against an important cog in the election of Republicans who was arguably responsible more than any other single person for the re-election of Donald Trump. The federal government doesn't have the power to prevent the deeply jewish- and zionist-controlled media and army of influencers from using their institutional power & connections to get to the bottom of who robbed them of their alleged beloved golden boy, "best friend to israel" Charlie Kirk. The Federal government didn't even have the power to resist israel dragging us into the *extremely* unpopular Iran war. ******* Influence and power flow downhill. At any point, a bigger fish could come along and expose the smaller fish who pulled off this conspiracy. But that's not what we're seeing. The conclusion is unavoidable: because it's the biggest fish who did this. Who's the biggest fish right now? Put another way, who's got the pre-eminent institutional power in America right now? Answer that and you'll have your culprit. ******* I'm reminded of J. Edgar Hoover's famous quote from 1956: "The individual comes face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst." Since then, we've gotten the JFK ass*ssination, the ass*ssinations of RFK & MLK, 9-11, global covid/vaxx tyranny and stolen presidential elections. And. So. Much. More. All unsolved & unresolved. Decade after decade. ******* Because of these 2 smoking guns in the Charlie Kirk case—smoking guns our American predecessors didn't have in those other crimes—we have the unique chance to draw a line in the sand right now: THIS FAR AND NO FURTHER. What will it be, Tyler Robinson or the Biggest Fish? We have it on the hook, will we let it wriggle away, or will we stand tall in the chair and land this beast? Those are our choices. Have you had enough slop, or do you want to finally feast? Like, comment, retweet, please. ▶️🔊
0:38

CHARLIE KIRK SMOKING GUNS Amongst the litany of lies & contradictions emanating from the "approved" Charlie Kirk ass*ssination narrative, there are 2 major "smoking guns". 🔖▶️ 🔊 1. Tyler Robinson was in custody & mirandized an hour and a half before the alleged Discord confession was posted, and 3 hours before public officials claim he was captured. CONVENIENTLY, Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby, along with the sheriff's office video camera footage, have been disappeared. 2. Either the Rode mic or receiver is lying in shards all over the seats & floor of the SUV. CONVENIENTLY, the mic/receiver & associated audio, along with the SUV, have been disappeared. ******* The shattered mic/receiver is more devastating, here's why: In the case of the alleged Discord confession, their plan seems to be to simply not introduce it into evidence. It's just being used to convict Tyler in the court of public opinion. Whether it's real or fake, the narrative that Tyler shot Charlie can still be true. In the case of the shattered mic, it transforms the fundamental fabric of the narrative: Tyler Robinson did NOT shoot Charlie Kirk. And then everything falls apart. ******* Together, these two smoking guns indicate the scope of the conspiracy: TPUSA doesn't itself have the power to frame Tyler Robinson, scuttle sheriff's office video, dispose of the SUV, or order the crime scene to be excavated to a depth of 10 inches & paved over. The state of Utah doesn't have the power to stop the FBI & federal government from pursuing the evidence and investigating any potential interstate plot against an important cog in the election of Republicans who was arguably responsible more than any other single person for the re-election of Donald Trump. The federal government doesn't have the power to prevent the deeply jewish- and zionist-controlled media and army of influencers from using their institutional power & connections to get to the bottom of who robbed them of their alleged beloved golden boy, "best friend to israel" Charlie Kirk. The Federal government didn't even have the power to resist israel dragging us into the *extremely* unpopular Iran war. ******* Influence and power flow downhill. At any point, a bigger fish could come along and expose the smaller fish who pulled off this conspiracy. But that's not what we're seeing. The conclusion is unavoidable: because it's the biggest fish who did this. Who's the biggest fish right now? Put another way, who's got the pre-eminent institutional power in America right now? Answer that and you'll have your culprit. ******* I'm reminded of J. Edgar Hoover's famous quote from 1956: "The individual comes face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst." Since then, we've gotten the JFK ass*ssination, the ass*ssinations of RFK & MLK, 9-11, global covid/vaxx tyranny and stolen presidential elections. And. So. Much. More. All unsolved & unresolved. Decade after decade. ******* Because of these 2 smoking guns in the Charlie Kirk case—smoking guns our American predecessors didn't have in those other crimes—we have the unique chance to draw a line in the sand right now: THIS FAR AND NO FURTHER. What will it be, Tyler Robinson or the Biggest Fish? We have it on the hook, will we let it wriggle away, or will we stand tall in the chair and land this beast? Those are our choices. Have you had enough slop, or do you want to finally feast? Like, comment, retweet, please. ▶️🔊

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

109,294 次观看 • 1 个月前

THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE OTHER MICROPHONE MAN: COOPER BROWN—AND THE ORIGINAL WITNESS TESTIMONY THAT CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT IN THE CHEST Candace Owens Baron Coleman Jimmy Dore 18 minutes after Charlie Kirk was k*lled, Cooper Brown infamously physically stopped Jeb Jacobi from telling us Charlie had been shot in the neck. That was at 12:42 PM MDT. And then Cooper himself went on Fox News later that day to tell us the exact same thing at about 6:35 PM MDT. Have you ever wondered what explains this sequence of events? It might have something to do with the fact that there seemed to be an original narrative earlier in the afternoon that Charlie had been shot in the chest, but which was soon changed to the story we know now that he'd been shot in the neck. Shot in the chest = Narrative 1.0 Shot in the neck = Narrative 2.0 One witness, "Sarah from Draper", went on national TV at 1:17 PM MDT to tell us that Charlie had been shot in the chest (Narrative 1.0). Then she went on TV again at 2:08 PM MDT, just 51 minutes later, and changed her story to Charlie having been shot in the neck (Narrative 2.0). When Jeb Jacobi told everyone that Charlie had been shot in the neck, it's possible that Cooper Brown was still operating on the pre-established Narrative 1.0, "Shot in the chest," and Cooper intervened to stop Jeb's narrative from getting out. At that moment in time, from Cooper's POV (allegedly), the official Narrative (1.0) was supposed to be a chest shot. Later, after the Narrative had to be modified to 2.0, Cooper went on national news to help establish the new version—along with the rest of the fake narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. Nevermind that Tyler Robinson hadn't yet been captured. ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION SCENARIO (ALLEGEDLY): Charlie's mic or necklace was supposed to explode, simulating a .30-06 shot to the chest. Something unanticipated happened creating a neck wound. Cooper's back was to the scene as it happened, so he didn't see the neck wound. But he did inadvertently tell us that he turned around due to the sound of the "POP!" (which must have come from behind him to his right). This was the Rode Mic (or maybe necklace) exploding. Once the police herded everyone into the Sorenson Student Center, that's where we got the confrontation between him and Jeb Jacobi. Cooper didn't yet know the shifted narrative: he hadn't seen what happened, and was still programmed to enforce Narrative 1.0, the chest shot. About 35 minutes after the Brown/Jacobi altercation, "Sarah From Draper"—herself still operating on Narrative 1.0—went on TV to tell us Charlie was shot in the chest. Sometime after that, whomever was orchestring this narrative control and cover-up, issued the new directive: Narrative 2.0, Charlie was shot in the neck. And just 51 minutes later, Sarah was paraded out on TV again to establish the new tall tale. And then Cooper Brown was sent onto Fox News, not once but twice: once the evening of the 10th, and another time in the early afternoon on September 11th. The second time, he helped parrot the other critical part of the anchoring narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. And then, "ABRACADABRA!" a few hours later, Tyler Robinson would turn himself in. And the rest, as they say, is history. NOTES ON JEB JACOBI: Some have observed Jeb Jacobi's odd video rehearsal with Phil Lyman a few minutes after Charlie's death, just before the altercation with Cooper Brown. Why was he rehearsing his testimony that Charlie had been shot in the neck? Is it because it was different from the original narrative he was supposed to give us? It's also been noted that Jacobi was the only other person known to have covered his ears or grabbed his head, besides Hunter Kozak, when Charlie was killed. Why were they the only ones in the crowd that reacted this way? Then, somehow, Jacobi appeared on "60 Minutes" with Hunter Kozak, where they both helped anchor the original narrative that Leftist violence is the problem and that we need more open dialogue. This helped reinforce the "trans-furry Leftist Tyler Robinson did it" patsy narrative. Was the Jacobi-Brown altercation a case of two different hands of the same corrupt body reacting on the fly to a situation that had gone awry—not realizing that they were each playing a movie role for the same Director? DISCLAIMER: This is just a possible theoretical interpretation of events, given the information we have, and no actual guilt is being imputed, nor am I making any accusations. H/t: Charliesangels47 for finding the before and after Sarah footage.
9:30

THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE OTHER MICROPHONE MAN: COOPER BROWN—AND THE ORIGINAL WITNESS TESTIMONY THAT CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT IN THE CHEST Candace Owens Baron Coleman Jimmy Dore 18 minutes after Charlie Kirk was k*lled, Cooper Brown infamously physically stopped Jeb Jacobi from telling us Charlie had been shot in the neck. That was at 12:42 PM MDT. And then Cooper himself went on Fox News later that day to tell us the exact same thing at about 6:35 PM MDT. Have you ever wondered what explains this sequence of events? It might have something to do with the fact that there seemed to be an original narrative earlier in the afternoon that Charlie had been shot in the chest, but which was soon changed to the story we know now that he'd been shot in the neck. Shot in the chest = Narrative 1.0 Shot in the neck = Narrative 2.0 One witness, "Sarah from Draper", went on national TV at 1:17 PM MDT to tell us that Charlie had been shot in the chest (Narrative 1.0). Then she went on TV again at 2:08 PM MDT, just 51 minutes later, and changed her story to Charlie having been shot in the neck (Narrative 2.0). When Jeb Jacobi told everyone that Charlie had been shot in the neck, it's possible that Cooper Brown was still operating on the pre-established Narrative 1.0, "Shot in the chest," and Cooper intervened to stop Jeb's narrative from getting out. At that moment in time, from Cooper's POV (allegedly), the official Narrative (1.0) was supposed to be a chest shot. Later, after the Narrative had to be modified to 2.0, Cooper went on national news to help establish the new version—along with the rest of the fake narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. Nevermind that Tyler Robinson hadn't yet been captured. ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION SCENARIO (ALLEGEDLY): Charlie's mic or necklace was supposed to explode, simulating a .30-06 shot to the chest. Something unanticipated happened creating a neck wound. Cooper's back was to the scene as it happened, so he didn't see the neck wound. But he did inadvertently tell us that he turned around due to the sound of the "POP!" (which must have come from behind him to his right). This was the Rode Mic (or maybe necklace) exploding. Once the police herded everyone into the Sorenson Student Center, that's where we got the confrontation between him and Jeb Jacobi. Cooper didn't yet know the shifted narrative: he hadn't seen what happened, and was still programmed to enforce Narrative 1.0, the chest shot. About 35 minutes after the Brown/Jacobi altercation, "Sarah From Draper"—herself still operating on Narrative 1.0—went on TV to tell us Charlie was shot in the chest. Sometime after that, whomever was orchestring this narrative control and cover-up, issued the new directive: Narrative 2.0, Charlie was shot in the neck. And just 51 minutes later, Sarah was paraded out on TV again to establish the new tall tale. And then Cooper Brown was sent onto Fox News, not once but twice: once the evening of the 10th, and another time in the early afternoon on September 11th. The second time, he helped parrot the other critical part of the anchoring narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. And then, "ABRACADABRA!" a few hours later, Tyler Robinson would turn himself in. And the rest, as they say, is history. NOTES ON JEB JACOBI: Some have observed Jeb Jacobi's odd video rehearsal with Phil Lyman a few minutes after Charlie's death, just before the altercation with Cooper Brown. Why was he rehearsing his testimony that Charlie had been shot in the neck? Is it because it was different from the original narrative he was supposed to give us? It's also been noted that Jacobi was the only other person known to have covered his ears or grabbed his head, besides Hunter Kozak, when Charlie was killed. Why were they the only ones in the crowd that reacted this way? Then, somehow, Jacobi appeared on "60 Minutes" with Hunter Kozak, where they both helped anchor the original narrative that Leftist violence is the problem and that we need more open dialogue. This helped reinforce the "trans-furry Leftist Tyler Robinson did it" patsy narrative. Was the Jacobi-Brown altercation a case of two different hands of the same corrupt body reacting on the fly to a situation that had gone awry—not realizing that they were each playing a movie role for the same Director? DISCLAIMER: This is just a possible theoretical interpretation of events, given the information we have, and no actual guilt is being imputed, nor am I making any accusations. H/t: Charliesangels47 for finding the before and after Sarah footage.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

64,882 次观看 • 1 个月前

Michael Savage nails the insane absurdity of the FBI's Charlie Kirk assassination narrative: "Something's wrong...we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find?" This clip is from a video Savage (Michael Savage) posted to X today, September 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the maga FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard. I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof. It looked very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle in his hand. "Now, the Mauser does not break down very easily. Incidentally, for those of you who know weapons, something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants, like, all in two seconds. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. "We are not hearing or seeing reality. And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find? The FBI to find. I don't believe a word of it. "I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government is lying to us. Something's wrong. Something's so wrong, it's sickening. "They found the rifle and they're getting the prints. Are you stupid? Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's in his backpack. I just told you moron, that this rifle doesn't break down that easily. And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the run. Wait, I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box, wrapped in a towel. He left breadcrumbs. Oh, and the trans anti. The trans stuff on the cartridges. Bullshit. Something is wrong with this whole fucking picture."
3:49

Michael Savage nails the insane absurdity of the FBI's Charlie Kirk assassination narrative: "Something's wrong...we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find?" This clip is from a video Savage (Michael Savage) posted to X today, September 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the maga FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard. I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof. It looked very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle in his hand. "Now, the Mauser does not break down very easily. Incidentally, for those of you who know weapons, something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants, like, all in two seconds. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. "We are not hearing or seeing reality. And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find? The FBI to find. I don't believe a word of it. "I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government is lying to us. Something's wrong. Something's so wrong, it's sickening. "They found the rifle and they're getting the prints. Are you stupid? Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's in his backpack. I just told you moron, that this rifle doesn't break down that easily. And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the run. Wait, I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box, wrapped in a towel. He left breadcrumbs. Oh, and the trans anti. The trans stuff on the cartridges. Bullshit. Something is wrong with this whole fucking picture."

Sense Receptor

4,452,523 次观看 • 11 个月前

The most important development yet to drop in the assassination of Charlie Kirk is this clip right here, where Candace Owens states that she has multiple sources who claim to have written communications from Charlie the day before he was murdered stating that he thought “they” were going to kill him [with one of those sources being a TPUSA donor]. This would also corroborate the conversation that Infowars news anchor Harrison H. Smith ✞ had [who is not affiliated with TPUSA] one month before Charlie Kirk was killed, where he was told that Charlie thought Israel would kill him if he abandoned the pro-Israel cause [which led to Harrison’s now infamous tweet stating just that back on 8/13/2025]. Candace has no discernible incentive to lie about the existence and veracity of these messages. She already produced the text exchange proving that Charlie was getting intense pressure from his Jewish donors and expressed a desire to abandon the pro-Israel cause just 48 hours before he was killed. This was a fact that everyone in the pro-Israel camp denied for almost a month following Charlie’s death, up to and including Bibi Netanyahu. We now know most of those people were either outright lying or uniformed. In both cases, the existence and verification of those messages by TPUSA spokesman and Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has changed the entire conversation. Why did the people in the group chat or those who knew about Charlie’s evolving views lie about it? I think there’s a strong possibility that these [alleged] messages will see the light at some point, assuming these individuals aren’t in legitimate fear for their own lives and/or have the courage to come forward. At a minimum, these communications should be provided to law enforcement if they haven’t been already as part of the investigation [assuming the FBI actually plans to conduct a real one]. If so, we may end up seeing them in court. We know Candace has extensive connections and relationships within the TPUSA network, including with donors, as is evident by the recent letter from John Mappin and Irina Mappin. To doubt the authenticity of this claim, which she says is in writing from two sources and known by at least 3, would be extremely naive, IMO. It doesn’t make sense for her to lie about this. The liability is far too great. Given the above, it appears to be almost a certainty that Charlie Kirk thought that there was a possibility he was going to be murdered by pro-Israel forces, at least in part due to the decision he had made to distance himself and TPUSA from the Israeli/Jewish cause. Now you need to ask yourself, what would make Charlie feel that way? Why would he feel strongly enough about the possibility of being assassinated that he would communicate that in both conversation and in writing, including to at least one TPUSA donor? Bear in mind, confiding in a wealthy donor to the organization about your fear of being killed is no small decision. Did something happen to Charlie that created this fear? It’s logical to ask, was he ever explicitly [or implicitly] threatened? Was he aware of similar things happening to others? If the above is true … what are the odds he was actually assassinated by a random 22 year-old trans loving furry Zoomer on the following day, on a campus 4 hours away from where Tyler Robinson lived, at a school he wasn’t a student at? If Charlie’s fears were true and warranted, I think we’d be foolish to ignore them. Who would be in a better position to know “from who” and “why” he could be at risk than Charlie himself? Every thread should be pulled and every stone lifted and turned. Charlie’s memory, family, friends and supporters deserve nothing less.
1:11

The most important development yet to drop in the assassination of Charlie Kirk is this clip right here, where Candace Owens states that she has multiple sources who claim to have written communications from Charlie the day before he was murdered stating that he thought “they” were going to kill him [with one of those sources being a TPUSA donor]. This would also corroborate the conversation that Infowars news anchor Harrison H. Smith ✞ had [who is not affiliated with TPUSA] one month before Charlie Kirk was killed, where he was told that Charlie thought Israel would kill him if he abandoned the pro-Israel cause [which led to Harrison’s now infamous tweet stating just that back on 8/13/2025]. Candace has no discernible incentive to lie about the existence and veracity of these messages. She already produced the text exchange proving that Charlie was getting intense pressure from his Jewish donors and expressed a desire to abandon the pro-Israel cause just 48 hours before he was killed. This was a fact that everyone in the pro-Israel camp denied for almost a month following Charlie’s death, up to and including Bibi Netanyahu. We now know most of those people were either outright lying or uniformed. In both cases, the existence and verification of those messages by TPUSA spokesman and Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has changed the entire conversation. Why did the people in the group chat or those who knew about Charlie’s evolving views lie about it? I think there’s a strong possibility that these [alleged] messages will see the light at some point, assuming these individuals aren’t in legitimate fear for their own lives and/or have the courage to come forward. At a minimum, these communications should be provided to law enforcement if they haven’t been already as part of the investigation [assuming the FBI actually plans to conduct a real one]. If so, we may end up seeing them in court. We know Candace has extensive connections and relationships within the TPUSA network, including with donors, as is evident by the recent letter from John Mappin and Irina Mappin. To doubt the authenticity of this claim, which she says is in writing from two sources and known by at least 3, would be extremely naive, IMO. It doesn’t make sense for her to lie about this. The liability is far too great. Given the above, it appears to be almost a certainty that Charlie Kirk thought that there was a possibility he was going to be murdered by pro-Israel forces, at least in part due to the decision he had made to distance himself and TPUSA from the Israeli/Jewish cause. Now you need to ask yourself, what would make Charlie feel that way? Why would he feel strongly enough about the possibility of being assassinated that he would communicate that in both conversation and in writing, including to at least one TPUSA donor? Bear in mind, confiding in a wealthy donor to the organization about your fear of being killed is no small decision. Did something happen to Charlie that created this fear? It’s logical to ask, was he ever explicitly [or implicitly] threatened? Was he aware of similar things happening to others? If the above is true … what are the odds he was actually assassinated by a random 22 year-old trans loving furry Zoomer on the following day, on a campus 4 hours away from where Tyler Robinson lived, at a school he wasn’t a student at? If Charlie’s fears were true and warranted, I think we’d be foolish to ignore them. Who would be in a better position to know “from who” and “why” he could be at risk than Charlie himself? Every thread should be pulled and every stone lifted and turned. Charlie’s memory, family, friends and supporters deserve nothing less.

Murray 🇺🇸

114,058 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 EXPLOSIVE CONFIRMATION: DRONE OVERHEAD AT CHARLIE KIRK’S UVU EVENT 🚨 We now know that Charlie Kirk’s own security team had a drone in the air just ONE HOUR before the event began at UVU. This was confirmed by Dr. Frank Turek, who says he and Charlie even reviewed the drone footage together in the car on the way in. Dr. Turek admitted he told Charlie he had a bad feeling about the setup — “too many buildings around it.” And here’s the bombshell: Dr. Turek also revealed Charlie had confided to him, “I know they want me dead.” 👉 So here’s the question: If security had a drone before the event… why wasn’t it up during the actual event? Or was it — and they’re hiding what it really saw? And how could they “miss” a supposed shooter on the roof of the Losee building, right there in plain view? This adds to the growing mountain of red flags about Charlie’s security detail that day — from shady behavior to possible blackmail and compromise. Charlie told multiple people he thought “they” were going to kill him. Now we need to ask the question out loud: WHO is “they”? The world deserves an answer. Also Checkout my post below detailing MAJOR Blackmail type material on Dan Flood Protection for Turning Point USA on the day of the shooting. MAJOR Red Flags!!!
1:47

🚨 EXPLOSIVE CONFIRMATION: DRONE OVERHEAD AT CHARLIE KIRK’S UVU EVENT 🚨 We now know that Charlie Kirk’s own security team had a drone in the air just ONE HOUR before the event began at UVU. This was confirmed by Dr. Frank Turek, who says he and Charlie even reviewed the drone footage together in the car on the way in. Dr. Turek admitted he told Charlie he had a bad feeling about the setup — “too many buildings around it.” And here’s the bombshell: Dr. Turek also revealed Charlie had confided to him, “I know they want me dead.” 👉 So here’s the question: If security had a drone before the event… why wasn’t it up during the actual event? Or was it — and they’re hiding what it really saw? And how could they “miss” a supposed shooter on the roof of the Losee building, right there in plain view? This adds to the growing mountain of red flags about Charlie’s security detail that day — from shady behavior to possible blackmail and compromise. Charlie told multiple people he thought “they” were going to kill him. Now we need to ask the question out loud: WHO is “they”? The world deserves an answer. Also Checkout my post below detailing MAJOR Blackmail type material on Dan Flood Protection for Turning Point USA on the day of the shooting. MAJOR Red Flags!!!

Project Constitution

277,792 次观看 • 10 个月前

Candace deleted this video off every platform. It was the first podcast she did with PragerU. Now why would she want this particular video taken down right after Charlie died? It was up in Sept. I watched the entire video. Now it's gone. This is why Charlie didn't want to deal with the wrath of Candace. Just remember while watching the video the look on Charlie's face while she says it. Can you imagine her calling him up in the middle of the night crying, yelling and screaming at him like a raging lunatic? Also, remember she wouldn't go to the events and hang out with the students. A lot of the times she wouldn't show at all. She would demand to be taken back to the hotel immediately after any of the events. The hurt and the angst I believe came from Erika showing up on the scene. Notice how she tries to make it Charlie and Candace and everyone ties their names together. She was trying to make that connection as something between them. Then later in the video she jokes that everyone thought that her and Charlie were dating and people were disappointed to learn that they weren't a couple. I may have that clip, but I will have to look for it. This is right after she was asked to leave from TPUSA the first time over the "Hitler" comments. I don't think it was the Hitler comments. Can you imagine being Charlie and Erika and having to travel with Candace? I don't think it went well.
0:41

Candace deleted this video off every platform. It was the first podcast she did with PragerU. Now why would she want this particular video taken down right after Charlie died? It was up in Sept. I watched the entire video. Now it's gone. This is why Charlie didn't want to deal with the wrath of Candace. Just remember while watching the video the look on Charlie's face while she says it. Can you imagine her calling him up in the middle of the night crying, yelling and screaming at him like a raging lunatic? Also, remember she wouldn't go to the events and hang out with the students. A lot of the times she wouldn't show at all. She would demand to be taken back to the hotel immediately after any of the events. The hurt and the angst I believe came from Erika showing up on the scene. Notice how she tries to make it Charlie and Candace and everyone ties their names together. She was trying to make that connection as something between them. Then later in the video she jokes that everyone thought that her and Charlie were dating and people were disappointed to learn that they weren't a couple. I may have that clip, but I will have to look for it. This is right after she was asked to leave from TPUSA the first time over the "Hitler" comments. I don't think it was the Hitler comments. Can you imagine being Charlie and Erika and having to travel with Candace? I don't think it went well.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

135,937 次观看 • 1 天前

📢 The Charlie Kirk MILITARY OPERATION to start a CIVIL WAR was a FAILURE!! 🥴 Mistake after mistake after mistake was committed on 9/10... 🕵🏾‍♂️ And for the first time in the world, they never expected a civilian (ex-military) to find out HOW TO SEE THE EVIDENCE OF INVISIBLE INFRARED BEAM TECHNOLOGY on the back of Charlie Kirk's head!! 🏆 Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 is the only series in the world that covers BOTH OF THE SHOTS that impacted Charlie's body simultaneously... My 2-shot theory has been in circulation since the beginning of this investigation, but it has not received any consideration from the larger platforms yet, except one recently... 🥳 And that's with DDGotAPodcast! Check out that MASSIVE interview over there... Besides that, I came to X after being banned from TikTok in September over exposing both shots that impacted Charlie Kirk's body. I've been on X since October, releasing more and more information as I find it, or it becomes available. It is by the grace of God that I am still able to give you all this information. All I ask is that you give it to the world. 🙄 EVERYTHING that the mainstream media is talking about regarding the Charlie Kirk assassination is made up and 100% theater. 🔑 Based on the entries and exits of both bullets that impacted Charlie Kirk's body, it is physically impossible for Tyler Robinson to have been involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk in any way whatsoever. 🔑 Based on the entries and exits of both bullets that impacted Charlie Kirk's body, it is physically impossible for a wireless microphone to have exploded on Charlie Kirk's body on the stage. ✅ Yes the exploding microphone did detonate in the SUV. All of this will be covered in PART VI of CKO322... Get ready!! If you thought Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 PART V brought you CLOSURE, PART VI is going to give you the energy that you need to fight back against Israel merging with the United States in the weeks and months ahead... We must stop this merger for Charlie!! 💭 If they were able to use Israeli technology to do this to Charlie Kirk in broad daylight in front of women and children, what do you think they will do to us if we don't stand against the implementation of Section 219? There is still time to take action to save our country from this ILLEGAL & DANGEROUS merger with Israel!! 🗽 Unity around the TRUTH is what we can stand on...
7:01

Sensitive content

📢 The Charlie Kirk MILITARY OPERATION to start a CIVIL WAR was a FAILURE!! 🥴 Mistake after mistake after mistake was committed on 9/10... 🕵🏾‍♂️ And for the first time in the world, they never expected a civilian (ex-military) to find out HOW TO SEE THE EVIDENCE OF INVISIBLE INFRARED BEAM TECHNOLOGY on the back of Charlie Kirk's head!! 🏆 Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 is the only series in the world that covers BOTH OF THE SHOTS that impacted Charlie's body simultaneously... My 2-shot theory has been in circulation since the beginning of this investigation, but it has not received any consideration from the larger platforms yet, except one recently... 🥳 And that's with DDGotAPodcast! Check out that MASSIVE interview over there... Besides that, I came to X after being banned from TikTok in September over exposing both shots that impacted Charlie Kirk's body. I've been on X since October, releasing more and more information as I find it, or it becomes available. It is by the grace of God that I am still able to give you all this information. All I ask is that you give it to the world. 🙄 EVERYTHING that the mainstream media is talking about regarding the Charlie Kirk assassination is made up and 100% theater. 🔑 Based on the entries and exits of both bullets that impacted Charlie Kirk's body, it is physically impossible for Tyler Robinson to have been involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk in any way whatsoever. 🔑 Based on the entries and exits of both bullets that impacted Charlie Kirk's body, it is physically impossible for a wireless microphone to have exploded on Charlie Kirk's body on the stage. ✅ Yes the exploding microphone did detonate in the SUV. All of this will be covered in PART VI of CKO322... Get ready!! If you thought Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 PART V brought you CLOSURE, PART VI is going to give you the energy that you need to fight back against Israel merging with the United States in the weeks and months ahead... We must stop this merger for Charlie!! 💭 If they were able to use Israeli technology to do this to Charlie Kirk in broad daylight in front of women and children, what do you think they will do to us if we don't stand against the implementation of Section 219? There is still time to take action to save our country from this ILLEGAL & DANGEROUS merger with Israel!! 🗽 Unity around the TRUTH is what we can stand on...

WeAreNotGoingToMars

170,125 次观看 • 20 天前

🚨 THE MAN WITH THE GUN THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT 🚨 We’ve heard about: • George Zinn • Zachariah Ahmed Qureshi • Tyler Robinson ...but not a single word about HIM. He was caught on video running from the crowd just seconds after Charlie Kirk was assassinated with gun in hand. Even Candace Owens said, “I think it is likely… that what we should be looking for… are TWO people that had weapons that day.” Who is this man? Why the silence? What are they covering up?
0:40

🚨 THE MAN WITH THE GUN THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT 🚨 We’ve heard about: • George Zinn • Zachariah Ahmed Qureshi • Tyler Robinson ...but not a single word about HIM. He was caught on video running from the crowd just seconds after Charlie Kirk was assassinated with gun in hand. Even Candace Owens said, “I think it is likely… that what we should be looking for… are TWO people that had weapons that day.” Who is this man? Why the silence? What are they covering up?

HustleBitch

243,142 次观看 • 10 个月前