Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
EXPOSING Farzi Arguments Against DELIMITATION
62,613 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
9 Kommentare

They make the exact opposite argument in Reservations. Wahan population ke hisaab se chahiye sab. Exact same argument.

Haryana matches South Indian states in per capita GDP—with a much smaller population. Yet, you’ll never see it demanding extra seats in Parliament. Thank you for taking the example of Haryana. keshav bhai

Jis tareeke se out of context @lakshayonly ko drag kiya apne, uss se lagta hai apki bhot jada kilasti hai uske followers dekh k 😢😢😢

In my opinion, you are the only person who can defend Dhruv Rathee.

I have posted many videos pointing his inaccuracies. Search on my YouTube channel.

Traditionally delimitation has been done on the basis of population, however according to population control policies and efforts states those who are successful in controlling population growth should be incentivised. Southern states fare well on population control measures...

Your opinions oscillate between Marx and Hindutva,nothing in between.Why is it so ?

But it’s true Why to make everything rhetorical Imagine if tomorrow a very backward state gets 30% population and Lalu gets hold of 100 seats and becomes PM Then you would criticise the same policy Fact is because of UP which holds most seats , most PM have been UP MPs

Bhai, do something in Draconian rohith vemula act.



