Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Extensive Lab Analysis Finds Potentially Harmful Substances in the Covid-19 Injections: • cesium • barium • cobalt • iron • chromium • titanium • aluminum • silicone • sulfur Mark Trozzi: "None of these ingredients were declared by the manufacturers—they're not even listed on the ingredients list. There's no...

1,235,154 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

The Vigilant Fox 🦊's profile picture
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 years ago

If you appreciate my work and don’t want to miss anything, consider hitting the bell on my profile page: @VigilantFox

Truth Justice ™'s profile picture
Truth Justice ™3 years ago

@DrBenTapper1 The whole world will know what governments around the world did to billions of innocent people. How they deceived and killed the innocent in order to make everyone believe through fear that the only solution was the toxic experimental Covid vaccines.

Scott M 's profile picture
Scott M 3 years ago

The same people who mocked those who took Ivermectin as horse paste gobblers take these toxic cocktails without a peep.

Shalini's profile picture
Shalini3 years ago

Terrible ingredients in death jab! I wonder how less dangerous all other previous non-COVID vaccines I took are.

JustAWomanWithAnOpinion's profile picture
JustAWomanWithAnOpinion3 years ago

I'm actually allergic to aluminum; can't even use deodorant containing it. Good to know @pfizer thought it was a grand idea to keep the ingredients "classified" and risk millions of lives.

Naughty Beaver's profile picture
Naughty Beaver3 years ago

Lab report from the Pleiadians November 2021. The first on earth. I hope people realize they are the real deal.👇🧐

P_bennison's profile picture
P_bennison3 years ago

There’s a reason that Pharma doesn’t allow their vaccine to be chemically tested by the countries buying it.

Nil's profile picture
Nil3 years ago

Maybe graphene was just a distraction.

Related Videos

"Before [the] COVID era...I evaluated...normal vaccines...I found a lot of...metallic contaminants...barium sulfate, aluminum, stainless steel...That was in the pre-COVID era. After, the contamination [was]...different. [It was] nanotechnological contamination." Dr. Antonietta Gatti, an Italian bionanotechnology expert, describes for Dr. Tess Lawrie (Dr Tess Lawrie), Dr. Mark Trozzi (Dr Mark Trozzi MD), et al. during a World Council for Health Discussion (World Council for Health (WCH)) posted to Rumble on June 23, 2025 how she found "metallic contaminants" in "normal vaccines" prior to the COVID era. Gatti notes these contaminants included Barium sulfate, aluminum, stainless steel, and tungsten carbide. After the rollout of the COVID injections, Gatti says "the contamination inside the vaccines [was] completely different. [It was] nanotechnological contamination." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Probably nobody knows that before COVID era, I have evaluated the vaccines. The normal vaccines, not the new drugs. And I found a lot of contaminants, also metallic contaminants. By 2018, verified as a presence of nanoparticle micro and nanoparticle inside the vaccines. Barium Sulfate, aluminum, stainless steel, tungsten carbide. They were already present in the normal vaccines. "And, when the article appeared, it was published in the journal Vaccine and Vaccination Journal Vaccine and Vaccination. And about the quality control. I received a lot of, messages also from Australia, New Zealand and so on. And I received an email message also From Robert Kennedy Jr. He was very glad of my courage After I understood. That was not a compliment because I received the visitor of police, and so on. "That was in pre era Covid. After, the contamination inside the vaccine were completely different. They were nanotechnological contamination."

Sense Receptor

16,264 views • 1 year ago

WOW 🚨 Big Food found a loophole to still use toxic ingredients but not have to list them in the ingredients list This means we are buying items we think have certain things we’re watching for removed but they really aren’t Since most of us are getting better at reading the back of the box, big food has moved a lot of chemicals from the ingredient list to the processing list “Under FDA regulations, if a substance is used during the manufacturing of a food but is removed in some manner, it's classified as a processing aid. Processing aids fall under the incidental additive rule, which exempts very real and present chemicals from being disclosed on the ingredient label” This is FDA rules (21 CFR 101.100) that exempt certain substances from the ingredient list. These include processing aids and substances added during manufacturing but removed before final packaging or present at insignificant levels with no functional effect in the finished food. They fall under “incidental additives.” Here’s a simple example - Vanilla beans are crushed. - A chemical solvent (like hexane or ethanol) soaks them to pull out the flavor compounds. - The solvent is mostly removed with heat and vacuum (processing aid). - What’s left is the extract that goes into your ice cream, yogurt, or baked goods So what they’re saying is, because those chemicals should be mostly removed during the processing part, then they don’t need to be listed at all on the ingredients This is so deceptive because there are still trace amounts of those chemicals in the product

Wall Street Apes

41,323 views • 2 months ago

Barack Obama ruined American healthcare and here are the facts “At the heart of the shutdown debate is whether or not Congress should extend these expanded temporary Obamacare subsidies. Here are 6 reasons why they shouldn't be extended - The first is that they cost almost half a trillion dollars. And at a time when we have $2 trillion annual deficits, we can't afford to throw more fuel on our fiscal bonfire - The second reason is that they're largely welfare for the well off. These credits can be claimed by people earning up to $600,000 a year. About a third of the cost goes to people over 400% of the poverty line. So they're simply not well targeted to people in need - The third reason is the subsidies are largely captured by insurance companies. The subsidy themselves goes directly to insurance companies and then it's captured in the form of higher price inflation and larger profits by these large insurance companies. - Fourth reason is that they fuel rampant enrollment fraud. More than 6 million people are improperly enrolled and millions more don't use the coverage that they're enrolled in, signaling that there's more people enrolled in the program than there should be - Fifth reason is that patients don't value the coverage. They only are enrolled because the federal government is covering 100% of of the cost for many people. And if the government only covered 90% of the cost, they would choose to spend their own money on something they value more. - The last reason is these subsidies were initially temporary on purpose. They were a response to the pandemic and the pandemic is over. And these are the reasons Congress should let these subsidies expire. They are expensive, they're not well targeted, and they fuel rampant fraud in our healthcare system.”

Wall Street Apes

77,528 views • 10 months ago