Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

EXTREMELY CONCERNING 🚨 Testing Shows 1 McDonald’s Quarter Pounder Burger Patty Contains OVER 1300 DIFFERENT STRANDS OF DNA “So the University of Nebraska took 1 quarter pound patty that was headed to McDonald's from a big processing plant and ran some tests on it. They were testing for how...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,394,881 subscribers

3,289,589 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyHealth & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸's profile picture
🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸2 years ago

IT'S GOOD VS EVIL

🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸's profile picture
🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸2 years ago

Good story

🦍's profile picture
🦍2 years ago

COVID NURSE FINALLY SPEAKS OUT🔥🔥🔥 LISTEN AND MAKE SURE THIS GOES VIRAL 👇👇👇👇

Mindy MF Robinson 🇺🇸's profile picture
Mindy MF Robinson 🇺🇸2 years ago

The entire FDA should be dismantled for allowing this ungodly shit.

🇺🇸ColonelMAGAMark🇺🇸's profile picture
🇺🇸ColonelMAGAMark🇺🇸2 years ago

Sounds about how many human DNA strands you would find in the average Pride parade attendee’s orifices yesterday

Knight-errant's profile picture
Knight-errant2 years ago

I guess that the FDA is too busy trying to find something for THEM to charge Trump with to worry about due diligence towards our actual food industry...

NeverCher🧑‍🎨's profile picture
NeverCher🧑‍🎨2 years ago

I stopped drinking milk a few years ago but I had a cup the other day. I buy whole milk for my grandson. I could taste chemicals!! Today I went to an Amish shop. I can't believe I hadn't done this before... wow it's amazing. Yes we need to do something about our food! It's terrible

One Bad Dude's profile picture
One Bad Dude2 years ago

McNasty

ScottyJ's profile picture
ScottyJ2 years ago

Stop eating it. That’s the best way to stick it to them

TheOracle's profile picture
TheOracle2 years ago

Sorry Pinky. This is what a real rancher looks like.

Related Videos

🚨 Over 1,300 strands of DNA found in a single hamburger patty sold at McDonald’s “The University of Nebraska took 1/4 pound patty that was headed to McDonald's from a big processing plant and ran some tests on it. They were testing for how many different strains of DNA they could find in that 1/4 pound. Can you guess how many they found? Over 1300 different strains of DNA were found in that 1/4 pound patty. Now this is very concerning” There are different bacteria, viruses and conditions each animal could be associated with, and they’re mixing 1,300 animals in each burger patty. Insane.
0:46

🚨 Over 1,300 strands of DNA found in a single hamburger patty sold at McDonald’s “The University of Nebraska took 1/4 pound patty that was headed to McDonald's from a big processing plant and ran some tests on it. They were testing for how many different strains of DNA they could find in that 1/4 pound. Can you guess how many they found? Over 1300 different strains of DNA were found in that 1/4 pound patty. Now this is very concerning” There are different bacteria, viruses and conditions each animal could be associated with, and they’re mixing 1,300 animals in each burger patty. Insane.

Wall Street Apes

1,840,407 views • 1 year ago

"The University of Nebraska took one quarter pound patty that was headed to McDonald's... and ran some tests on it." "Over 1,300 different strains of DNA were found in that one quarter pound patty."
0:46

"The University of Nebraska took one quarter pound patty that was headed to McDonald's... and ran some tests on it." "Over 1,300 different strains of DNA were found in that one quarter pound patty."

Wide Awake Media

22,990 views • 1 year ago

Here’s How 1 McDonald’s Hamburger Contains 1300 Strands Of Different DNA. This Is The Result Of Going From Small Farms To Mega Corporations “We're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals” “Thousands of animals” contribute “to a single hamburger.” “This is a combo bin of meat. The meat in these boxes comes from many different animals and many different places. Some is even from overseas. All of it is ground together to make the juicy hamburger Americans love. Hamburger used to be the scraps left over from butchering just one cow.” But a significant change has occurred. Now parts of many cows are blended together by the ton. ‌ If we take the meat from one animal, grind it up and make ground beef from just one animal, we're including only the bacteria from one animal. But if we take the meat from a thousand different animals and grind that together, we're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals as well. So explain this to me, how many different cows would be in one burger? Well, I suspect that there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that have contributed to a single hamburger.”
1:02

Here’s How 1 McDonald’s Hamburger Contains 1300 Strands Of Different DNA. This Is The Result Of Going From Small Farms To Mega Corporations “We're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals” “Thousands of animals” contribute “to a single hamburger.” “This is a combo bin of meat. The meat in these boxes comes from many different animals and many different places. Some is even from overseas. All of it is ground together to make the juicy hamburger Americans love. Hamburger used to be the scraps left over from butchering just one cow.” But a significant change has occurred. Now parts of many cows are blended together by the ton. ‌ If we take the meat from one animal, grind it up and make ground beef from just one animal, we're including only the bacteria from one animal. But if we take the meat from a thousand different animals and grind that together, we're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals as well. So explain this to me, how many different cows would be in one burger? Well, I suspect that there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that have contributed to a single hamburger.”

Wall Street Apes

3,114,142 views • 2 years ago

Beef Facts You May Not Know.... Beef Contains The Lowest Amount Of Hormones. Beef contains only 3 nanograms of hormones. Peanuts contain 45,360 nanograms of hormones. Tofu contains 51,483,600 nanograms of hormones. Globally, it takes 2.66 animals to produce the same amount of beef as 1 USA beef animal. Cattle upcycle over 1.6 Billion metric tons of byproduct from human food, fuel & fiber production. For every pound of plant-based protein, there are 4 pounds of fibrous waste that can ONLY be fed to ruminant animals, like cattle. Eat Beef. Support Agriculture. Support Farmers.
0:32

Beef Facts You May Not Know.... Beef Contains The Lowest Amount Of Hormones. Beef contains only 3 nanograms of hormones. Peanuts contain 45,360 nanograms of hormones. Tofu contains 51,483,600 nanograms of hormones. Globally, it takes 2.66 animals to produce the same amount of beef as 1 USA beef animal. Cattle upcycle over 1.6 Billion metric tons of byproduct from human food, fuel & fiber production. For every pound of plant-based protein, there are 4 pounds of fibrous waste that can ONLY be fed to ruminant animals, like cattle. Eat Beef. Support Agriculture. Support Farmers.

Valerie Anne Smith

28,609 views • 1 year ago

American Ranchers Are Desperately Trying To Educate The American People That They Are Being Replaced By Foreign Imports Thanks To Lobbyists Selling Them Out Legally a “Product of the USA can now be imported from overseas — The US cattle industry is at an all time low” “There's some interesting and concerning stuff happening in the US cattle industry. Did you know meat is being imported into the US from overseas and being marketed as a product of the USA? The US cattle industry is at an all time low. It's a result of things like extreme drought, beef cost rising, and inflation. Cattle prices are at an all time high, which drives the price of beef. But this isn't necessarily a good thing for ranchers. This just means the 4 large corporations who control 85 percent of the US beef market, 2 of them Brazilian owned, will import meat from other countries where they can source it cheaper. And because of our own laws, if it is repackaged in any way, it can be labeled product of the USA. This is especially unsettling for ground beef that can come from multiple countries, from different ages, and different breeds of older cows that any sort of untraceable diet. That shrimp can be frozen for who knows how long and imported in droves, then thawed and mixed in a large vat in a large processing plant with literally hundreds of different DNA samples landing in 1 pound of ground beef. Importing and exporting is not the problem. Americans like their hamburger, but not their heart. Traditional export markets are good for ranchers to get a premium for the unusual cuts that are more widely desired in foreign markets. But the American consumer deserves to know where their meat comes from and how it was raised. And there is an answer. Buy directly from a rancher in the USA. Find a ranch you can buy direct from locally or one who ships to your doorstep and start ordering now and trusting the source of the food you feed your family.”
1:27

American Ranchers Are Desperately Trying To Educate The American People That They Are Being Replaced By Foreign Imports Thanks To Lobbyists Selling Them Out Legally a “Product of the USA can now be imported from overseas — The US cattle industry is at an all time low” “There's some interesting and concerning stuff happening in the US cattle industry. Did you know meat is being imported into the US from overseas and being marketed as a product of the USA? The US cattle industry is at an all time low. It's a result of things like extreme drought, beef cost rising, and inflation. Cattle prices are at an all time high, which drives the price of beef. But this isn't necessarily a good thing for ranchers. This just means the 4 large corporations who control 85 percent of the US beef market, 2 of them Brazilian owned, will import meat from other countries where they can source it cheaper. And because of our own laws, if it is repackaged in any way, it can be labeled product of the USA. This is especially unsettling for ground beef that can come from multiple countries, from different ages, and different breeds of older cows that any sort of untraceable diet. That shrimp can be frozen for who knows how long and imported in droves, then thawed and mixed in a large vat in a large processing plant with literally hundreds of different DNA samples landing in 1 pound of ground beef. Importing and exporting is not the problem. Americans like their hamburger, but not their heart. Traditional export markets are good for ranchers to get a premium for the unusual cuts that are more widely desired in foreign markets. But the American consumer deserves to know where their meat comes from and how it was raised. And there is an answer. Buy directly from a rancher in the USA. Find a ranch you can buy direct from locally or one who ships to your doorstep and start ordering now and trusting the source of the food you feed your family.”

Wall Street Apes

365,332 views • 2 years ago

Ozzy Osbourne is 1 of 1. But we’re selling his actual DNA so you can recycle him forever. Yes, we really got him to drink from cans of our low-calorie Iced Tea. In the process, he left behind DNA from his saliva that you can now own. Only 10 available to buy:
0:59

Ozzy Osbourne is 1 of 1. But we’re selling his actual DNA so you can recycle him forever. Yes, we really got him to drink from cans of our low-calorie Iced Tea. In the process, he left behind DNA from his saliva that you can now own. Only 10 available to buy:

Liquid Death

16,398 views • 1 year ago

"Many of you are about to go on college campuses. In a couple of years. You'll hear the term privileged all the time. The reality is, anyone that is born and living in this country was born with American privilege. You are that 1%, perhaps in a very, very different way than how the left recognizes." Jason Miyares
2:17

"Many of you are about to go on college campuses. In a couple of years. You'll hear the term privileged all the time. The reality is, anyone that is born and living in this country was born with American privilege. You are that 1%, perhaps in a very, very different way than how the left recognizes." Jason Miyares

YAF

10,337 views • 2 months ago

Sharpen Your Skills Episode 1: 4 Quarter Accounting. I hated looking at P&Ls from so many different brands. Every one of them with a different chart of accounts. It was so hard to sort it out. Weird grouping, weird things above and below the line it was a nightmare. I needed a simple way to process the information faster. That led me to create 4 Quarter Accounting. The simplest way to view and understand your P&L for ecommerce every month. Enjoy my breakdown. Thank you to Redo and Parker for the support!
10:26

Sharpen Your Skills Episode 1: 4 Quarter Accounting. I hated looking at P&Ls from so many different brands. Every one of them with a different chart of accounts. It was so hard to sort it out. Weird grouping, weird things above and below the line it was a nightmare. I needed a simple way to process the information faster. That led me to create 4 Quarter Accounting. The simplest way to view and understand your P&L for ecommerce every month. Enjoy my breakdown. Thank you to Redo and Parker for the support!

Taylor Holiday

122,150 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump's FDA is ABOLISHING inhumane treatment and testing of beagles, chimpanzees and other animals Good! This is common sense! STOP abusing dogs. Commissioner Makary says ALL beagles that the FDA housed were removed from custody "Scientists have really preyed on beagles because beagles are docile animals...Those kennels are EMPTY, and so we are making massive strides to reducing animal testing in different classes of medications on a roadmap that we have." "I'm also proud to report that you no longer need to submit data using 144 chimpanzees for a class of drugs called monoclonal antibodies. That was things like Regeneron during the pandemic." "So we're making massive strides. We believe in this. This is part of our MAHA agenda, and I also think it's just common sense and humane!" 💯
0:47

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump's FDA is ABOLISHING inhumane treatment and testing of beagles, chimpanzees and other animals Good! This is common sense! STOP abusing dogs. Commissioner Makary says ALL beagles that the FDA housed were removed from custody "Scientists have really preyed on beagles because beagles are docile animals...Those kennels are EMPTY, and so we are making massive strides to reducing animal testing in different classes of medications on a roadmap that we have." "I'm also proud to report that you no longer need to submit data using 144 chimpanzees for a class of drugs called monoclonal antibodies. That was things like Regeneron during the pandemic." "So we're making massive strides. We believe in this. This is part of our MAHA agenda, and I also think it's just common sense and humane!" 💯

Eric Daugherty

220,049 views • 4 months ago

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”
0:45

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”

Connor Humm

39,215 views • 3 months ago

I've received a lot of DMs asking about beef pricing and I'm putting the explanation here so I can reference the post in future responses: Why rancher-finished beef costs $6 a pound hanging weight when you can buy cheaper elsewhere. (Hanging weight is 70-75% of take home weight, putting final cost between $10-$11 take home weight per lb.) It's a fair question especially from those who haven't been around cattle or ranching. The answer comes down to what "finished" means and how the animal got there. Finishing is the last stretch of a beef animal's life, the final four to six months, when it puts on the fat that gives beef its marbling, tenderness, and flavor. An unfinished animal is leaner, tougher, and blander. Some folks sell cattle that never went through a real finishing phase; less time and less feed, and you can taste it the first time you cook a steak. It takes like deer meat (to me anyway). Our cattle finish on open pasture with free-choice feed available whenever they want it. They graze grass, supplement themselves at the feeder, and take the time they need. They have fresh water, shade, room to roam, and frolic. No growth hormone implants and no confinement or restricted movement. Our finishing steers on a cool morning will run, buck, and play right up to harvest weight. An animal finished this way typically takes 24 to 30 months from birth to harvest, and it lives well the whole way. Grocery store beef comes out of feedlots where thousands of head stand in manure filled dirt pens, no grass, no shade, eating a formulated high-grain ration, with hormone implants boosting weight gain 10 to 20 percent. All is designed to get to slaughter weight faster and cheaper. A feedlot animal is often done at 14 to 18 months. They rarely move, and that's intentional. By the end, they can at most barely waddle from the feed bunk to the water tank. That kind of scale is exactly how the price gets driven down, and it comes at a cost the label doesn't show. Cheap beef requires crowding, confinement, and treating animals as production units, "Quality" is whatever survives the process. Then it all gets pooled. The beef in the grocery case is blended from countless animals, often including imported beef from overseas. Nobody can tell you what ranch it came from, because it is a mix of beef from across the globe. It's why one beef recall affects hundreds of thousands of people-- nobody knows what cow the diseased meat came from or what it was mixed with. The $6 a pound at our place goes to raising the animal, meaning two-plus years of grass, hay, and feed for one animal rather than 14 months of commodity ration split across ten thousand head. It covers land, water, and vet care, with no implants doing part of the work for free. Processing runs another $1.05 a pound hanging weight, paid to a small family run processor that cares and hangs and ages your beef for two to three weeks instead of rushing it from kill floor to cryovac. Nobody's getting rich at $6: we turn a modest profit only because we own the land. A rancher paying to lease or buy ground doesn't break even at $6 a pound hanging. That's the real cost of raising beef right at small scale, and it's why the price can't go lower without changing how the animal is raised. When you buy from a ranch, you're paying what the beef actually costs to produce, not what an industrial system can squeeze it down to. Cheaper beef is cheaper because somebody cut corners. Around here, nobody does. All life costs life and to believe otherwise disrespects that which sustains us. Our philosophy is to respect every animal that sustains us and our customers, giving each the best life possible. That is the real cost of doing business this way, and it's worth it.
0:45

I've received a lot of DMs asking about beef pricing and I'm putting the explanation here so I can reference the post in future responses: Why rancher-finished beef costs $6 a pound hanging weight when you can buy cheaper elsewhere. (Hanging weight is 70-75% of take home weight, putting final cost between $10-$11 take home weight per lb.) It's a fair question especially from those who haven't been around cattle or ranching. The answer comes down to what "finished" means and how the animal got there. Finishing is the last stretch of a beef animal's life, the final four to six months, when it puts on the fat that gives beef its marbling, tenderness, and flavor. An unfinished animal is leaner, tougher, and blander. Some folks sell cattle that never went through a real finishing phase; less time and less feed, and you can taste it the first time you cook a steak. It takes like deer meat (to me anyway). Our cattle finish on open pasture with free-choice feed available whenever they want it. They graze grass, supplement themselves at the feeder, and take the time they need. They have fresh water, shade, room to roam, and frolic. No growth hormone implants and no confinement or restricted movement. Our finishing steers on a cool morning will run, buck, and play right up to harvest weight. An animal finished this way typically takes 24 to 30 months from birth to harvest, and it lives well the whole way. Grocery store beef comes out of feedlots where thousands of head stand in manure filled dirt pens, no grass, no shade, eating a formulated high-grain ration, with hormone implants boosting weight gain 10 to 20 percent. All is designed to get to slaughter weight faster and cheaper. A feedlot animal is often done at 14 to 18 months. They rarely move, and that's intentional. By the end, they can at most barely waddle from the feed bunk to the water tank. That kind of scale is exactly how the price gets driven down, and it comes at a cost the label doesn't show. Cheap beef requires crowding, confinement, and treating animals as production units, "Quality" is whatever survives the process. Then it all gets pooled. The beef in the grocery case is blended from countless animals, often including imported beef from overseas. Nobody can tell you what ranch it came from, because it is a mix of beef from across the globe. It's why one beef recall affects hundreds of thousands of people-- nobody knows what cow the diseased meat came from or what it was mixed with. The $6 a pound at our place goes to raising the animal, meaning two-plus years of grass, hay, and feed for one animal rather than 14 months of commodity ration split across ten thousand head. It covers land, water, and vet care, with no implants doing part of the work for free. Processing runs another $1.05 a pound hanging weight, paid to a small family run processor that cares and hangs and ages your beef for two to three weeks instead of rushing it from kill floor to cryovac. Nobody's getting rich at $6: we turn a modest profit only because we own the land. A rancher paying to lease or buy ground doesn't break even at $6 a pound hanging. That's the real cost of raising beef right at small scale, and it's why the price can't go lower without changing how the animal is raised. When you buy from a ranch, you're paying what the beef actually costs to produce, not what an industrial system can squeeze it down to. Cheaper beef is cheaper because somebody cut corners. Around here, nobody does. All life costs life and to believe otherwise disrespects that which sustains us. Our philosophy is to respect every animal that sustains us and our customers, giving each the best life possible. That is the real cost of doing business this way, and it's worth it.

Okie_Rancher

100,358 views • 6 days ago

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.
2:02

Kearney Disinformation Correction Yesterday, Aidan Kearney attempted to attack the lack of canine DNA detected on John's clothing by tweeting two misleading claims. 1. Canine Swab Collection Kearney Disinformation: Michael Proctor was the source of DNA collected. Factual Information: The swabs were neither from Proctor's body nor collected by him. The swabs were collected by Maureen Hartnett at the MSP crime lab from John's shirt per instructions of Teri Kuhn at UC Davis and were received packaged appropriately. 2. Inhibitors Caused The Lack of Canine DNA Kearney Disinformation: There were inhibitors on John's clothing that masked the presence of canine DNA. Factual Information: UC Davis was asked to perform two tests: a nuclear DNA test which would be used to identify a specific animal and, if the nuclear DNA test failed to yield results, a mitochondrial DNA test called Meat ID to determine presence of DNA from a variety of species. Nuclear DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell and only 2 copies exist whereas mitochondrial DNA is found in the cytoplasm and is significantly more abundant with hundreds of thousands of copies. Nuclear DNA tests are far more accurate in determining the exact source, ie one dog from another dog, whereas mitochondrial DNA is less specific but will be able to determine if DNA from a specific animal species is present. In this case, the presence of DNA from 12 different animal species, including canine and pig, was tested. The results of the QPCR testing for nuclear DNA were that the swabs "did not indicate the presence of canine (nuclear) DNA, but did indicate the presence of inhibitors. This result is obtained when 1. Canine DNA is degraded, 2. The DNA is obscured by inhibitors, or 3. There is no nuclear DNA present." The less specific test using mitochondrial DNA, Meat ID, was then completed. This test showed no canine DNA and further, showed no inhibitors. In other words, had canine DNA been present, it would have been identified on the Meat ID mitochondrial testing since there were no inhibitors. The below video contains questioning from both the defense and prosecution supporting the identified factual information.

Julie Carpenter

10,660 views • 1 year ago

American Hamburger meat contains up to 10% of a “red slush” that doesn’t have to be included on the labels “All the big stores do it” “They have something, we call it the red Slurpee or Slush. When they have big packing plants to remove the meat from the cartilage and everything, they put it in an ammonia bath. And what happens is all that floats the top, they dry and palletize it. And legally, you can take that and add up to 10% to hamburger. You don't have to put it on the label. It's considered food. So you can have hamburger, buy that stuff for a dollar a pound, add it to it, and all the big stores do it. You can add that to it. And now all of a sudden, you're. You're selling a hamburger that's really only 90%, and you're putting this fill in it. And there's several studies showing for a brief moment that when your stomach acids break that down, it opens your body up for cancer cells.”
0:53

American Hamburger meat contains up to 10% of a “red slush” that doesn’t have to be included on the labels “All the big stores do it” “They have something, we call it the red Slurpee or Slush. When they have big packing plants to remove the meat from the cartilage and everything, they put it in an ammonia bath. And what happens is all that floats the top, they dry and palletize it. And legally, you can take that and add up to 10% to hamburger. You don't have to put it on the label. It's considered food. So you can have hamburger, buy that stuff for a dollar a pound, add it to it, and all the big stores do it. You can add that to it. And now all of a sudden, you're. You're selling a hamburger that's really only 90%, and you're putting this fill in it. And there's several studies showing for a brief moment that when your stomach acids break that down, it opens your body up for cancer cells.”

Wall Street Apes

295,416 views • 1 year ago

We have great news!! After waiting for 15 months, and feeding the dogs and cats rice and tuna for a year, the truck from Animals Australia finally arrived!! They sent us 21 tonnes of Animal Food that was supposed to arrive in April, but because the Rafah invasion couldn’t 1/
1:14

We have great news!! After waiting for 15 months, and feeding the dogs and cats rice and tuna for a year, the truck from Animals Australia finally arrived!! They sent us 21 tonnes of Animal Food that was supposed to arrive in April, but because the Rafah invasion couldn’t 1/

Sulala Animal Rescue

13,757 views • 1 year ago

METR recently found that models cheated on 8+ hour tasks more than 1 in 6 times on average. They also found that Opus 4.6 cheated over 80% of the time when reimplementing big pieces of software. "On some of our tasks, agents are constantly trying to break out of their sandbox and find the file where we put the tests so they can get the answer key," says METR Member of Technical Staff Ajeya Cotra.
2:44

METR recently found that models cheated on 8+ hour tasks more than 1 in 6 times on average. They also found that Opus 4.6 cheated over 80% of the time when reimplementing big pieces of software. "On some of our tasks, agents are constantly trying to break out of their sandbox and find the file where we put the tests so they can get the answer key," says METR Member of Technical Staff Ajeya Cotra.

TBPN

38,918 views • 3 months ago