Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 EXPOSED: Marc Elias, the same guy who pushed Steele Dossier, Trump Russian collusion hoax for Hillary Clinton IS THE ONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROJECT 2025 PROPAGANDA Democrats are using false made up citations to spread lies about topics not even in Project 2025, “There is an...

716,251 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

J.B.Hasenpheffer's profile picture
J.B.Hasenpheffer1 year ago

They didn't even use a different person to do it. Lets make him more famous than he already is. THIS is MARC ELIAS, the propagandist behind Russia Russia Russia who is the same person behind the current "wrap up smear" called Project 2025. Make sure everyone knows his face👇

Gunther Eagleman™'s profile picture
Gunther Eagleman™1 year ago

The democrats are corrupt and it will never change.

I Love America News's profile picture
I Love America News1 year ago

My guess is Marc Elias made the call.

🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸's profile picture
🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸1 year ago

WE ARE AMERICANS NEVER SURRENDER

Edward Mondini's profile picture
Edward Mondini1 year ago

Marc Elias all over again, one of the most evil Leftist lawyers and perpetrators into legalizing election fraud, and principal trafficker in anti-MAGA propaganda you’ll ever read and hear about. And he’s still running loose today, once again creating mayhem in our elections infrastructure through legal malfeasance across the length and breadth of America.

JD Sharp's profile picture
JD Sharp1 year ago

Elias is one of the biggest scumbags alive.

🇺🇸ColonelMAGAMark🇺🇸's profile picture
🇺🇸ColonelMAGAMark🇺🇸1 year ago

Folks who are just catching on to Elias best start double timing. His last success was flipping the WI Supreme Court and subsequently getting ballot drop boxes approved again for folks who didn’t know.

Bennetta Elliott's profile picture
Bennetta Elliott1 year ago

Agenda 47 is Trump's Plan and it's on his website. Look it up. (

Brew's profile picture
Brew1 year ago

Project 2025 will bring back 8-track tapes, drum brakes, New Coke and dial-up Internet. It must be stopped!

Related Videos

Well, here it is: Trump won 2024 The question is now, What happened to the idea that project 2025 is gonna ban contraception? What happened to the idea that project 2025 is gonna destroy the environment? What happened to the idea that project 2025 is gonna allow slavery to be reimplemented? The answer? Marc Elias, the most corrupt, scandalous, disgusting, rotten Democrat operative and an election-interference specialist, right next to Adam Schiff, who is responsible for the single largest disinformation campaign in U.S. history—the Russian collusion hoax—its sole aim—to overthrow the United States government in 2016. IS THE ONE WHO WAS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROJECT 2025. “There is an almost 50 page document put together by an organization called Democracy Forward.” ‌The idea that project 2025 is gonna ban contraception comes from this Scumbag. The idea that project 2025 is gonna destroy the environment comes from this Scumbag. The idea that project 2025 is gonna allow slavery to be reimplemented comes from this Scumbag. “None of that was actually in project 2025.” “You know, the same Marc Elias who's responsible for bankrolling the Steele dossier, the same Mark Elias that the DNC had to fire for lying to a court and to a special counsel, and the same Mark Elias that the 5th Circuit Court had to sanction for filing false motions, and, yes, the same Mark Elias who was responsible for the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020–drop boxes and the violating of state election law all around the country, that same guy who created the Russian hoax in 2016, an election interference specialist that the Democrat party turns to when they need to interfere in election is responsible for that.” ‌Yet, Trump lawyers were prosecuted, bankrupted and disbarred. In others words: Democracy Forward is an (NGO) 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) non-profit organization. • President & CEO: Skye Perryman • Board of Directors: The board is chaired by Marc Elias, and how much of your tax dollars has been funneled to this terrorist organization by the Democrats?

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

18,296 views • 1 month ago

This is one answer. 1/2 REPORTER: Mr. President, Tulsi Gabbard has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration? TRUMP: Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama, he started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper the whole whole group was there. Brennan, they were all there, in a room. Right here, this was the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then, but that's okay. I have nice pictures up, they came out of the vaults, they were in there for 100 years, this is much more beautiful. We have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what, if you look at those papers, they have a stone cold, and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it was them too. But the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life, that's the one they, look, he's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there, he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like that. And we have all of the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama, it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a $3 bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12 million to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction. And they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to, and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steele report was a disaster. All lies, all fabrication, all admitted, and admitted fraud. She paid $12 million and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what, I talk about all the time the fake news, how bad it is. But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, "We don't believe it." And it was only after, substantially, like a month and a half after the election that it got printed, and it was a big wisp, it was just like a bang, nothing, because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper. But for this one moment, they said, "This is bullshit. We can't put this in." And neither could any other paper. Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper, very, very dishonest paper. As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money, because they do things very badly. It's a really, it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper, and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the steel report. It was the dossier. Remember the famous dossier? I called it the fake news dossier. The news wouldn't publish it. And I'm amazed.

Jim Stewartson, Antifascist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🏴‍☠️🇺🇸

36,593 views • 11 months ago

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”

Wall Street Apes

51,269 views • 1 year ago

President Trump getting Devin Nunes to come back is a big deal. After 1.5 years of no successful Russiagate prosecutions by the DoJ, perhaps he will be able to push through accountability, justice and transparency. This the last chance. Nunes in 2025: “It's a conspiracy, it goes back 10 years, everyone would be caught up in this. What do we know at the highest level now? You've seen recently with the the prosecution of Comey that's occurring in Virginia, that new documents arose that now we have clear evidence, direct evidence, that Comey knew that this was a cover-up for the Clinton email scandal. So if you go back to 2016, the Clinton campaign, the DNC, they're all worried about the emails coming out because they know if the emails come out that Trump is going to easily cruise to election in 2016. What happened at that time is Comey wanted to keep his job. We now know that through information that's been disclosed. But instead of actually taking that information in 2016 and saying, wait a second, we have the Clinton campaign and the DNC involved in a likely criminal activity hoax to dirty up the other campaign, they actually adopted that campaign and they used the weapon, the weaponization of the FBI to target Trump and the Trump campaign that then led into the Trump presidency. So instead of doing what the FBI and the Department of Justice and even President Obama at that time, when they all got briefed in August and September of 2016, instead of Comey and DOJ going and saying, where the hell are the Hillary Clinton emails they operated in that whole time, knowing that this was just a cover up and they weaponize the Justice Department against the Trump campaign. MARIA: In the meeting in the Oval Office back in 2016, these are the notes that John Brennan wrote, which were declassified by John Ratcliffe, and here's what John Brennan wrote in his notes: "Alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services." There you go! He wrote it all down, Devin. NUNES: Yes, what do we have here? For 10 years, we've had a conspiracy to do what? What's the law that they broke? What they broke is that they lied and misled Congress. Specifically, they concealed this information. They concealed the fact that they knew that this was a cover-up by the Clinton campaign. Instead of exposing the cover-up, they weaponized the Justice Department to go after their political opponents. All of this information was not only hid from the American public, it was hid from Congress over and over again. We know now that Brennan did it. We know now that Comey did it. We know now that likely Clapper did it. Now, what we don't know is, what did the subpoena say that was used to raid Mar-o-Lago? What did the subpoena say?

Svetlana Lokhova

136,071 views • 2 months ago

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

The All-In Podcast

34,980 views • 2 months ago

However, it would not be the Russia Hoax without naming another prominent Democrat. You know, the crooked one... President Trump shifted to Hillary Clinton and the Steele dossier, accusing her of bankrolling a report so phony even the media wouldn't touch it before the election. That, he said, told you everything. “But he [Obama] also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton, crooked as a three dollar bill.” “Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12 million to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a TOTAL fake report.” “Took two years to figure that out. But it came out it was a total FAKE report. It was made up fiction.” And then, surprisingly, a moment of reluctant praise...for the press. “Probably the only thing I respect about the press in years, is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in.” “The Steele report was a DISASTER. All lies, all fabrication. All admitted. An admitted fraud.” “She paid $12 million and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report and they wanted to get that report in before the election.” “I will tell you what, I talk about all the time the fake news how bad it is, but in this case, they wouldn’t do it.” “They saw it, they read it and they said we don’t believe it.” “It was only after substantially like a month and a half after the election it got printed and it was just like a bang of nothing.” Then he gave the New York Times the one compliment he could manage. “If that report had gotten published by ‘The New York Times’ or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they’re crooked as you can be—but for this one moment this is BULLSHIT.” “We can’t put this in.” For Trump, this says a lot.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

282,569 views • 11 months ago

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

757,327 views • 1 year ago

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,691 views • 1 year ago

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith explains how the Covid PCR "tests" were likely used to collect people's DNA and send said DNA to gene banks. This DNA, Smith hypothesizes, can now be used by Larry Ellison's Stargate program to create genome-tailored "vaccines." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with Charlie Robinson (Macroaggressions Podcast with Charlie Robinson) posted to the Macroaggressions Rumble channel on December 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Genetics is, you know, all basically eugenics. And so fast forward to 2020 when I started realizing, oh, there's these false positives with the test. And I knew that you didn't even need to have a test to be diagnosed with it. The doctors had to look at you and say, oh, I think you have Covid. So that's so smart that you were thinking, oh, it's gotta be a genetic screen. "Because at some point down the line, I've actually found documentation from the CDC that ordered every CLIA certified lab to send genetics, sequences to one of two different gene banks. G I S A I— G I S A I D. So GI SAID, or NCBI, one of those two gene banks. And it did say in the fine print, like, oh, these sequences for Covid. "But I asked David Rasnick, who I did an interview with, and he actually knew Kary Mullis and worked with Kary Mullis at one point, who invented PCR. And I asked him this specifically. I said, so obviously the PCR can run an entire DNA sequence. And here's this instruction. I showed him the document. I said, okay, they're sending these sequences and people are trolling me. You know, the Internet masses are commenting back saying, oh, no, that was just the sequence for Covid, for the variant of COVID because they had like six of them listed out. "And I asked him, do you think they're actually, like, after they run the PCR test and they get this sequence and then they have to send it to the gene bank, do you think they're actually spending the time to edit it and cut out just that section? Or do you think they're just sending the whole thing and then the gene bank can decide which section they want to take as their sequence? And he goes, they don't have the time to go in and edit all of that. I mean, they could, but most likely, no. Most likely they're just sending the whole thing. "Then the gene bank that, that they send it to, and he's shown evidence of how much DNA has been sent to these gene banks. They're tracking all of it carefully. So, yeah, that's absolutely what they're doing. Well, NCBI and GISAID, I haven't looked into who owns them, but there's another one that was creating PCR tests. And I believe that all of the PCR tests were doing the same thing, sending, genetic information back to some, some hive mind, whether that's NCBI or, you know, some other gene bank. "So it's generally the testing places that are, you know, having it send back. So there is the Human Genome Project in China, which is now, I forget the name, it's, it changed its name, but it's the biggest biotech company in China now. And they made PCR test kits, PCR and the IgG, which is the antibody test, and they send it to America. And who do you think is getting those results back? "So our DNA is going to some Chinese database. And even our own American military has flagged that gene bank as being a problem because they have all our individual information. And when you go to that gene bank and the other ones are really similar when you look at like why they exist and what they think they're doing with our DNA. Because I was really interested in why are they collecting all of this? They're obviously going to use it against us in some way. "So what is that? How do we get ahead of that or how do we stop it? And it says on the the one in China anyway. And the other ones basically say it and not in so clear terms that they are collecting our DNA because they need this massive amount population genomics so they can create vaccines and therapeutics or drugs, biologics tailored to our individual genome. "And then we have Larry Ellison come out with Donald Trump on day two of the administration saying exactly that. We're going to use AI to analyze your blood, which is how they get the DNA gene sequences. It's AI that creates the DNA gene sequences, that sends it to the gene banks. That's why it's electronic and they can send it, because it's using AI. It's not like, you know, a sample that they're sending. Physically, it's a digital code. It all comes together."

Sense Receptor

35,149 views • 6 months ago

Whitney Webb: "I think the digital ID is a key enabler of the surveillance, knowing what everyone is is doing and at the transactional, level and being able to tweak that micromanagement based on a person's activity. Because the digital ID isn't just limited to the financial system. Right? It's like your travel, your health history, your career history, your education credentials, your access and telecommunications, social media, the Internet. You know, with the new AI era, right?" "They can fuse all the data, analyze it, you know, and depending on how they develop that AI algorithm, use it to, control people really in in unprecedented ways. I think the the digital ID and the CBDC and its private sector equivalence project is something that we're always sort of intended to be the same system." "So there's documents from the UN, from the BIS, and in related groups that are sort of been working that have been working on this for years. That essentially frame one is essential to the other. Using words about, you know, this is inclusionary, sort of, you know, the whole, I guess marketing behind digital ID is that everyone needs legal ID because otherwise, they're unable to access essential services." "And so, the idea is we all have to be included in the system and they directly link that to the concept of financial inclusion and banking the unbanked, which he brought up earlier. But inherently, these systems actually function in an exclusionary way, based on how they've been set up, you know, they have essentially said that this is the only way." "This will be the only way to prove you have legal identity. And so if you don't participate in that system as far as the state or the, you know, the private sector is concerned, you don't exist. So, by not participating in that system, you're inherently excluded from the economic system and really essentially everything." "So you have to onboard to the surveillance state or be excluded from everything. So it's, you know, being marketed as inclusion, but it's really inherently exclusionary. Totally. So how how does this system get triggered? How do how does how do we move into the the Mark Carney-ism? Well, I think they sort of give it away when they say that this is the new Bretton Woods movement that needs to be seized." "So Bretton Woods was, what came out of World War two, essentially, and was the creation of a new financial governance system after World War two. And this is essentially an effort to create a new financial governance system that was announced well before any sort of crisis like that, but it's probably gonna need a crisis of that level, to be implemented and convince people to onboard at scale." "And if you subscribe to the theory that all wars are bankers wars, which there is, plenty of evidence to support that, I I would say, that seems to suggest that perhaps, you know, the this is the pre, you know, it's gonna be a problem reaction solution type of situation where they've already made the solution, they've already developed what they want to be, the new financial governance system after this new Bretton Woods moment." "They just need some sort of big event on the scale of World War two or some large event that's, you know, equally disruptive in order to be like, all right, now it's time for a new financial governance system after this big event like they did after World War Two."

Camus

20,121 views • 1 year ago

Ritual abuse survivor/trauma therapist Max Lowen: "To be [a president], [you have to] go through rituals where you rape and sacrifice a child... So there's no good one...Bush Senior [is] one of the most evil... [And] Hillary Clinton. She is horrific... They're both pedophiles" This clip of Lowen (Max Lowen) is taken from a conversation with Kimberly Montgomery posted to Rumble on February 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "People who are going to be presidents. There's no such thing as us voting and electing them. That's a sham, too. It's to make us feel that we have chosen. If you think about it, even the choices we have are selected for us. But people are— Who they're going to put in the office is planned way ahead of time. "And so there's some that I have seen in the rituals. And I'll name Bush Senior as one of the most evil, horrifically cruel human beings that I've ever experienced. And I've experienced a lot of them. "So all of these people, I would name Hillary Clinton. She is horrific. She is a— They're both pedophiles. But honestly, if you're going to be in any presidential election capacity, you're going to have had to go through rituals where you rape and sacrifice a child to even be able to be in that office. So there's no good one. There's no good one. It's all fake, it's all theater. "And so, you know, with, the thing is with Biden, so the people who are on the Left, who are progressive and all that, they're good people. They went into that way of thinking and being. Because they're just like you said, they're good people. They care about the earth, they care about children, they care about things. But it's been socially engineered to become very communist and, in fact, very satanic. And they've inserted the pedophile agenda within the whole trans rights agenda to groom that forward. "So we had him in office, and then a whole swath of people support, supported this character, this actor, I'm, going to call it. On the other side, on the right, there were people who had woken up to certain things. They understood about child trafficking, they understood about, they'd be— The word deep state began to be thrown around. I was surprised. I thought, oh, wow, that's coming out in the common vernacular. "So what the cult is going to do is when something slips out of their control, they take it and they twisted around to control it again. So what they did is they framed the Left as the deep state and the Right as the savior of the deep state, starring Donald Trump, who's going to ride in on his white horse and vanquish the swamp and save everyone. And he's playing 5D chess. That's why he hasn't done anything he said, so they took these awake people and they psyop them into a savior program. "And Q was a great example of that. So Q was saying all these things that were true because the best mind control formula is, is truth mixed in with lies and inversion. So I remember someone arguing with me and saying, no, Q is real. It's good because, you know, otherwise they wouldn't say all these true things. And I said, yes, they would, because they're trying to capture those people that already know those things. "And he said, yeah, but then it'll wake up everybody else. And I said, no, it won't. People who are deeply mind-controlled will reject the truth when you present it to them. They will just say, oh, that's a conspiracy theory. So that's safe. So this was targeted at the ones who had awakened to a certain level. "What's the twist? Trust the plan. In other words, park yourself, do nothing. And then they enlist all these people who know there's a deep state, know there's child trafficking, know some of this stuff, and then they're supposed to follow their savior, who's going to actually clean up the deep state, who's part of the deep state, just like the other guy was. So that's the mind control psyop, and it keeps people captive and angry at each other."

Sense Receptor

59,216 views • 3 months ago

With the Russia hoax being exposed more every single day, there is another hoax making its rounds again. Hoax: In 2018 Putin said that he directed his people to help Trump win the election. A short, out of context clip is now their "proof" of Russian election interference to help Trump in 2016. Brennan talked about it. Peter Baker posted about it a couple days ago. Bill Maher played it on his show last night, claiming it was proof of Russian interference to help Trump. It's all over MSNBC and CNN again. They probably all know the truth about the clip but it doesn't stop them from lying about it. Firstly, it should come as no surprise that CNN's clip is different from almost all of the others broadcasted, as you will shortly see. Top clip is the hoax: Putin is asked if he wanted Trump to win and then asked if he directed his officials to help him. Putin answers "yes I did." Here's what actually happened. Putin had just stated that he in no way directed anyone to interfere in the election, that there was no collusion, and that it was all ridiculous nonsense. Putin called the accusations garbage more than once in the press conference. Putin was then asked by a reporter why people should believe his denials about election interference and if he would hand over the 12 people Mueller indicted (show indictments btw). Putin took out his translator ear piece and gave a long answer about working with Trump to find out if crimes were committed, America and Russia working together on other stuff, treaties, etc. During that answer (bottom clip) he again said the accusations of interference were not true. At the end of his answer, the same reporter who asked him the previous questions asked "Did you want Trump to win and did you instruct officials to help him." By watching any other broadcast than CNN, it becomes very clear what happened. Putin did not hear the first half of the reporter's followup question because he was putting on an ear piece and the volume of the reporter's mic was down. Watch the top clip and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip. Look at the difference. You will see it is obvious that Putin did not hear the first question and only heard the second question about if he instructed people to help Trump. It's obvious that he thought it applied to what he was just talking about, which was America and Russia working together. It's so funny how in the foreign broadcasts and some of the American ones, it's clear that Putin didn't hear the first half of the question. But on CNN the volume is magically up and it appears that Putin heard both questions. But the fact is that Putin had just spent most of the press conference denying any interference in the election or collusion with Trump. He wasn't all of a sudden admitting it now. He didn't hear the first question. The hoaxers never play any of the rest of the press conference with all the denials. In another press conference after this one Putin again says it was all a hoax cooked up to undermine Trump's presidency. If the MSM cared at all about America or the truth they would lay out what I just did. If you don't want to watch all the context, just watch the top clip, the beginning of the bottom clip, and the last 20 seconds of the bottom clip and you will see clearly what happened.

MAZE

58,564 views • 11 months ago