Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Ex-Trump National Security Advisor Nadia Schadlow: “Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war.” Ezra Klein: READS HER THE CONSTITUTION 🤔

The Tennessee Holler

302,025 subscribers

233,356 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Trump advisor: Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war. Klein: I will quote the Constitution. ‘The Congress shall have power to declare war.’ Trump advisor: *silence* Klein: It is Congress that has the power to declare war. Trump advisor: S-so… The issue has to do with what was meant by ‘declare’…

Trump advisor: Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war. Klein: I will quote the Constitution. ‘The Congress shall have power to declare war.’ Trump advisor: silence Klein: It is Congress that has the power to declare war. Trump advisor: S-so… The issue has to do with what was meant by ‘declare’…

Headquarters

1,035,744 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Q: What will be the role of the National Assembly now following this declaration of the Emergency in Rivers State? Sen. Abaribe: “The constitution states very clearly that the National Assembly will have to approve it.”

Q: What will be the role of the National Assembly now following this declaration of the Emergency in Rivers State? Sen. Abaribe: “The constitution states very clearly that the National Assembly will have to approve it.”

Imran Muhammad

197,267 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Biden confuses the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence while accusing the Supreme Court of not "embracing" the Constitution. He then says "we fought a war...in 1960."

Biden confuses the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence while accusing the Supreme Court of not "embracing" the Constitution. He then says "we fought a war...in 1960."

RNC Research

945,786 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️– Former Trump National Security Advisor, John Bolton: "Trump is in a panic mode, wishing to find a way to declare victory and get out of this war regardless the strait of Hormuz is opened or not."

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️– Former Trump National Security Advisor, John Bolton: "Trump is in a panic mode, wishing to find a way to declare victory and get out of this war regardless the strait of Hormuz is opened or not."

MonitorX

28,972 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The Constitution is crystal clear: the president does not have the authority to go to war with Iran without approval by Congress. I strongly support bipartisan efforts to prevent Trump from unilaterally dragging us into another war in the Middle East.

The Constitution is crystal clear: the president does not have the authority to go to war with Iran without approval by Congress. I strongly support bipartisan efforts to prevent Trump from unilaterally dragging us into another war in the Middle East.

Senator Chris Van Hollen

81,486 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN: The Supreme Court has vacated contempt-of-Congress charges against ex-Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

JUST IN: The Supreme Court has vacated contempt-of-Congress charges against ex-Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

ABC News

23,721 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

White House National Security Advisor John Kirby says the US does not have any of its own imagery of the drones over NJ and NY. He claims the White House is adequately investigating the drones situation and there is no national security threat.

White House National Security Advisor John Kirby says the US does not have any of its own imagery of the drones over NJ and NY. He claims the White House is adequately investigating the drones situation and there is no national security threat.

UAP News

324,883 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We all agree Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. But that does not mean the Constitution should be a casualty because someone wants to take a shortcut to war. Our oath is to defend the Constitution—and it gives Congress the power to declare war.

We all agree Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. But that does not mean the Constitution should be a casualty because someone wants to take a shortcut to war. Our oath is to defend the Constitution—and it gives Congress the power to declare war.

Nancy Pelosi

651,985 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Former Trump official intellectually steamrolls Ezra Klein on his own show over the reality of Obama’s Iran Deal (JCPoA). NADIA SCHADLOW: “The fundamental goal was to remove Iran as a consistent terrorist power in the Middle East. Because people don’t agree with the rationale doesn’t mean that there isn’t a rationale. It’s just one they don’t agree with. “Ben would say the problems began with with Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPoA.” EZRA KLEIN: “Which is the nuclear deal the Obama administration had negotiated. Which gave us more inspection and oversight.” NADIA SCHADLOW: “Which AIMED to give us more inspection and oversight. “Ben’s view was that the problems began when President Trump withdrew from this deal, and that led to the Iranians actually accelerating their nuclear program. “Whereas President Trump and many people in the first Trump administration argued, no, the Iranians weren’t actually abiding by the deal fully. Inspections weren’t allowed. There were many military facilities that did not allow inspections. “And Iran’s fundamental intentions hadn’t changed. So these are different viewpoints. We’re not going to come to agreement necessarily, because the assumptions behind them are different. And as you pointed out, Ezra, you know, we’re beginning this conversation with a sense of different assumptions.” History is written by the winners, not revisionist history losers like Ezra Klein.

Former Trump official intellectually steamrolls Ezra Klein on his own show over the reality of Obama’s Iran Deal (JCPoA). NADIA SCHADLOW: “The fundamental goal was to remove Iran as a consistent terrorist power in the Middle East. Because people don’t agree with the rationale doesn’t mean that there isn’t a rationale. It’s just one they don’t agree with. “Ben would say the problems began with with Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPoA.” EZRA KLEIN: “Which is the nuclear deal the Obama administration had negotiated. Which gave us more inspection and oversight.” NADIA SCHADLOW: “Which AIMED to give us more inspection and oversight. “Ben’s view was that the problems began when President Trump withdrew from this deal, and that led to the Iranians actually accelerating their nuclear program. “Whereas President Trump and many people in the first Trump administration argued, no, the Iranians weren’t actually abiding by the deal fully. Inspections weren’t allowed. There were many military facilities that did not allow inspections. “And Iran’s fundamental intentions hadn’t changed. So these are different viewpoints. We’re not going to come to agreement necessarily, because the assumptions behind them are different. And as you pointed out, Ezra, you know, we’re beginning this conversation with a sense of different assumptions.” History is written by the winners, not revisionist history losers like Ezra Klein.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

159,738 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Friendly reminder: only Congress can declare war. Trump ordered a strike on a retreating boat in the Caribbean without Congressional approval. My War Powers Resolution will get answers and reassert Congress’s constitutional role.

Friendly reminder: only Congress can declare war. Trump ordered a strike on a retreating boat in the Caribbean without Congressional approval. My War Powers Resolution will get answers and reassert Congress’s constitutional role.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

91,344 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's fmr National Security Advisor John Bolton on the Iran war: "Trump doesn't have a philosophy, so I don't think he even understands what motivates these people."

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's fmr National Security Advisor John Bolton on the Iran war: "Trump doesn't have a philosophy, so I don't think he even understands what motivates these people."

Mario Nawfal

106,853 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump’s national security advisor humiliates Zelensky, comparing him to an annoying "ex-girlfriend" Waltz stated that the U.S. doubts Zelensky’s willingness to end the war and does not believe he is negotiating in good faith. Michael Waltz said that America needs a Ukrainian leader "it can do business with."

Trump’s national security advisor humiliates Zelensky, comparing him to an annoying "ex-girlfriend" Waltz stated that the U.S. doubts Zelensky’s willingness to end the war and does not believe he is negotiating in good faith. Michael Waltz said that America needs a Ukrainian leader "it can do business with."

NEXTA

302,957 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr