正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ex-Trump National Security Advisor Nadia Schadlow: “Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war.” Ezra Klein: READS HER THE CONSTITUTION 🤔

The Tennessee Holler

299,934 subscribers

233,249 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Trump advisor: Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war. Klein: I will quote the Constitution. ‘The Congress shall have power to declare war.’ Trump advisor: *silence* Klein: It is Congress that has the power to declare war. Trump advisor: S-so… The issue has to do with what was meant by ‘declare’…

Trump advisor: Congress does not have a constitutional role in the declaration of war. Klein: I will quote the Constitution. ‘The Congress shall have power to declare war.’ Trump advisor: silence Klein: It is Congress that has the power to declare war. Trump advisor: S-so… The issue has to do with what was meant by ‘declare’…

Headquarters

1,035,520 次观看 • 4 个月前

Schiff: "This was not constitutional, it was not lawful in the absence of a declaration by Congress. The administration should've come to Congress ... you want the American people bought in on an action this substantial that could lead to a major outbreak of war."

Schiff: "This was not constitutional, it was not lawful in the absence of a declaration by Congress. The administration should've come to Congress ... you want the American people bought in on an action this substantial that could lead to a major outbreak of war."

Aaron Rupar

49,325 次观看 • 1 年前

In my 11 years of service as an intelligence officer in the United States Navy Reserve, I saw firsthand why the framers of our Constitution gave Congress an essential role in our national security and matters of war and peace. There is no more consequential decision than whether or not to get American troops involved in a war. I’m proud to help launch this National Security Task Force in Congress that’s focused on no-nonsense solutions to keeping the American people safe and strengthening our national security. CC: House Democrats

In my 11 years of service as an intelligence officer in the United States Navy Reserve, I saw firsthand why the framers of our Constitution gave Congress an essential role in our national security and matters of war and peace. There is no more consequential decision than whether or not to get American troops involved in a war. I’m proud to help launch this National Security Task Force in Congress that’s focused on no-nonsense solutions to keeping the American people safe and strengthening our national security. CC: House Democrats

Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander

22,737 次观看 • 1 年前

Q: What will be the role of the National Assembly now following this declaration of the Emergency in Rivers State? Sen. Abaribe: “The constitution states very clearly that the National Assembly will have to approve it.”

Q: What will be the role of the National Assembly now following this declaration of the Emergency in Rivers State? Sen. Abaribe: “The constitution states very clearly that the National Assembly will have to approve it.”

Imran Muhammad

197,267 次观看 • 1 年前

Biden confuses the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence while accusing the Supreme Court of not "embracing" the Constitution. He then says "we fought a war...in 1960."

Biden confuses the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence while accusing the Supreme Court of not "embracing" the Constitution. He then says "we fought a war...in 1960."

RNC Research

945,755 次观看 • 3 年前

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️– Former Trump National Security Advisor, John Bolton: "Trump is in a panic mode, wishing to find a way to declare victory and get out of this war regardless the strait of Hormuz is opened or not."

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️– Former Trump National Security Advisor, John Bolton: "Trump is in a panic mode, wishing to find a way to declare victory and get out of this war regardless the strait of Hormuz is opened or not."

MonitorX

28,972 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Constitution is crystal clear: the president does not have the authority to go to war with Iran without approval by Congress. I strongly support bipartisan efforts to prevent Trump from unilaterally dragging us into another war in the Middle East.

The Constitution is crystal clear: the president does not have the authority to go to war with Iran without approval by Congress. I strongly support bipartisan efforts to prevent Trump from unilaterally dragging us into another war in the Middle East.

Senator Chris Van Hollen

81,218 次观看 • 1 年前

JUST IN: The Supreme Court has vacated contempt-of-Congress charges against ex-Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

JUST IN: The Supreme Court has vacated contempt-of-Congress charges against ex-Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

ABC News

23,713 次观看 • 3 个月前

DEMOCRACY IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE CONSTITUTION OR THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE!!!!!! NOR DOES IT APPEAR IN ANY CONSTITUTIONS OF THE 50 STATES!!!

DEMOCRACY IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE CONSTITUTION OR THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE!!!!!! NOR DOES IT APPEAR IN ANY CONSTITUTIONS OF THE 50 STATES!!!

Jammles

84,539 次观看 • 1 年前

White House National Security Advisor John Kirby says the US does not have any of its own imagery of the drones over NJ and NY. He claims the White House is adequately investigating the drones situation and there is no national security threat.

White House National Security Advisor John Kirby says the US does not have any of its own imagery of the drones over NJ and NY. He claims the White House is adequately investigating the drones situation and there is no national security threat.

UAP News

324,823 次观看 • 1 年前

We all agree Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. But that does not mean the Constitution should be a casualty because someone wants to take a shortcut to war. Our oath is to defend the Constitution—and it gives Congress the power to declare war.

We all agree Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. But that does not mean the Constitution should be a casualty because someone wants to take a shortcut to war. Our oath is to defend the Constitution—and it gives Congress the power to declare war.

Nancy Pelosi

651,581 次观看 • 4 个月前

Friendly reminder: only Congress can declare war. Trump ordered a strike on a retreating boat in the Caribbean without Congressional approval. My War Powers Resolution will get answers and reassert Congress’s constitutional role.

Friendly reminder: only Congress can declare war. Trump ordered a strike on a retreating boat in the Caribbean without Congressional approval. My War Powers Resolution will get answers and reassert Congress’s constitutional role.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

91,323 次观看 • 10 个月前

Former Trump official intellectually steamrolls Ezra Klein on his own show over the reality of Obama’s Iran Deal (JCPoA). NADIA SCHADLOW: “The fundamental goal was to remove Iran as a consistent terrorist power in the Middle East. Because people don’t agree with the rationale doesn’t mean that there isn’t a rationale. It’s just one they don’t agree with. “Ben would say the problems began with with Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPoA.” EZRA KLEIN: “Which is the nuclear deal the Obama administration had negotiated. Which gave us more inspection and oversight.” NADIA SCHADLOW: “Which AIMED to give us more inspection and oversight. “Ben’s view was that the problems began when President Trump withdrew from this deal, and that led to the Iranians actually accelerating their nuclear program. “Whereas President Trump and many people in the first Trump administration argued, no, the Iranians weren’t actually abiding by the deal fully. Inspections weren’t allowed. There were many military facilities that did not allow inspections. “And Iran’s fundamental intentions hadn’t changed. So these are different viewpoints. We’re not going to come to agreement necessarily, because the assumptions behind them are different. And as you pointed out, Ezra, you know, we’re beginning this conversation with a sense of different assumptions.” History is written by the winners, not revisionist history losers like Ezra Klein.

Former Trump official intellectually steamrolls Ezra Klein on his own show over the reality of Obama’s Iran Deal (JCPoA). NADIA SCHADLOW: “The fundamental goal was to remove Iran as a consistent terrorist power in the Middle East. Because people don’t agree with the rationale doesn’t mean that there isn’t a rationale. It’s just one they don’t agree with. “Ben would say the problems began with with Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPoA.” EZRA KLEIN: “Which is the nuclear deal the Obama administration had negotiated. Which gave us more inspection and oversight.” NADIA SCHADLOW: “Which AIMED to give us more inspection and oversight. “Ben’s view was that the problems began when President Trump withdrew from this deal, and that led to the Iranians actually accelerating their nuclear program. “Whereas President Trump and many people in the first Trump administration argued, no, the Iranians weren’t actually abiding by the deal fully. Inspections weren’t allowed. There were many military facilities that did not allow inspections. “And Iran’s fundamental intentions hadn’t changed. So these are different viewpoints. We’re not going to come to agreement necessarily, because the assumptions behind them are different. And as you pointed out, Ezra, you know, we’re beginning this conversation with a sense of different assumptions.” History is written by the winners, not revisionist history losers like Ezra Klein.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

159,738 次观看 • 4 个月前

In a new podcast interview, Trump appointee & former national security advisor Michael Flynn said that "the only way that we're gonna have a fair federal election is if" Trump "declares ... some sort of a national emergency."

In a new podcast interview, Trump appointee & former national security advisor Michael Flynn said that "the only way that we're gonna have a fair federal election is if" Trump "declares ... some sort of a national emergency."

Alex Kaplan

19,562 次观看 • 9 个月前

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 次观看 • 9 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's fmr National Security Advisor John Bolton on the Iran war: "Trump doesn't have a philosophy, so I don't think he even understands what motivates these people."

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's fmr National Security Advisor John Bolton on the Iran war: "Trump doesn't have a philosophy, so I don't think he even understands what motivates these people."

Mario Nawfal

106,853 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trump’s national security advisor humiliates Zelensky, comparing him to an annoying "ex-girlfriend" Waltz stated that the U.S. doubts Zelensky’s willingness to end the war and does not believe he is negotiating in good faith. Michael Waltz said that America needs a Ukrainian leader "it can do business with."

Trump’s national security advisor humiliates Zelensky, comparing him to an annoying "ex-girlfriend" Waltz stated that the U.S. doubts Zelensky’s willingness to end the war and does not believe he is negotiating in good faith. Michael Waltz said that America needs a Ukrainian leader "it can do business with."

NEXTA

302,957 次观看 • 1 年前