FAA Check Airman Dan Govatos breaks down a simulation test performed in late 2001 by Commercial Airline Pilots that demolishes the Hijacker Pilot Narrative. The Pilots took 10 turns each in a 737 flight simulator and were only able to make contact 1 single time. Experienced. Airline. Pilots. The... notion that someone who's barely trained on a Cessna could maneuver a commercial airliner at top speed into a narrow target is insane.show more

I remember watching actual 747 pilots talk about how there is no way a novice pilot could make those turns.

Yet their claims are brushed off by "the experts" who have probably never even seen a cockpit in their life.

Zero chance they could fly them that fast and accurate. The pilots were watching the radar. So they could see all the info. They all shook their heads and said I’m not sure I could do that.

The probability of a commercial airliner piloted by a novice hijacker/pilot hitting the Pentagon as it is alleged to is even much less than the planes that hit the Trade Center. --> but the narrative is the hijackers were successful 3 out of 3.

I don’t know how tough it would be, Sky King made it look easy RIP Beebo

There will only ever be one Sky King. RIP indeed.

Remotely flown.

100% It's the only thing that makes sense.

I have read "somewhere" that all commercial aircraft were fitted with remote control piloting boxes as far back as the 1980's.

How about the 4th plain that was supposedly taken down by the passengers in that PA. field ? The tail section was found 2miles from the crash site . We are all puppets in this shit show . IMO

Yeah the second debris site in shanksville is incredibly shady.

you’re retarded if you think experienced pilots couldn’t hit the towers, how do you think they line up for landing on a runway?

Its all about the speeds if you listen to them talk here. At the speeds the planes hit the towers (both around 500mph) they said it was nearly impossible to hit. BUT they said that they were able to do it when they slowed down to "near landing speeds" which are around 180mph.

They were remote controlled drones packed with explosives and nothing will make me change my mind on that.

Same. Here. Theres almost no way they were anything else.

I did it in Microsoft FS. But let’s take this at face value….WTF is your theory. Remote control? Feel like that would be harder. So wtf happened?

Oh look, a faceless account with only 2 single posts claiming that they can do the impossible. Definitely debunked!

Bradley…you DID see that I said MSFS right? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@BradCGZ thank you for posting this. All valid points. Seriously. Brings us to logical conclusion: Programmed to fly into Tower with PRECISE coordinates Don't forget, on exact FLOOR was "company" with 24/7 access installed cardboard "boxes" from floor to ceiling Boom.

I've often wondered if they also installed a homing beacon on the floor along with everything else.

That would make it absolutely precise What if there was bad weather that day?! Was pilot just going to hit ANY tower? No sir. Homing beacon 100%.

Remote controlled

It had to be. Thats also why I think they were able to maintain high speeds that low

Any median flight sim enthusiast can do it first try, including pre flight, take off and navigation to target.

Im going to trust the pilots rather than some random dude from France thanks.

I wonder how many pilots. Including Dan, it could have three or four. So that is 1 in 30 or 40, or about a 3% chance of success, but all three succeeded about a 1 in 40,000 chance, despite novices. It would be interesting if pilots would try this experiment again, with prizes.

I think thats the problem with it right there. All 3 hitting their targets first try is unbelievable to me. Especially the corkscrew at the pentagon and the wrap around of the 2nd plane in New York. Commercial pilots with real incentive and time to get it down, could probably start mastering it. Novices who have never flown a real 767 before on their maiden voyage, flying 100 miles off course and hitting their targets dead on 3 out of 3 times is absurd to me.

@nihonbunka If you go back and watch in slow motion the video at ground level, you won’t see a plane hitting the pentagon! It was a missle or something similar. It’s a video that shows a gated entrance with the side of the building that was hit. There wasn’t a plane there!

@nihonbunka I have it saved somewhere in my phone. I’ll try to find it and post it. Last time I tried, X wouldn’t allow me to post it for some sketchy reason😑 I watched it over and over. No plane in site.

@BradCGZ I agree in the case of the Pentagon. I have seen the video you mention. There are those who say there were no planes in New York either, and with them I don’t agree.

Not to mention that Boeing themselves stated the planes couldn't physically come close to making those maneuvers at those speeds. Physically IMPOSSIBLE

I flew in a UPS flight simulator they use to train pilots. You can definitely fly it without a lot of training, taking off no problem, but Landing it is impossible I tried land it 10-15 times and never got close but flying it into a tower isn’t as hard as your making it sound

Wtf you mean drive thru it without scratching your car? At this point your objective is to just smash the jiffy lube, not drive thru it, this is retarded logic

Watch this video. Does it appear the plane is having to make any turns or corrections like the graphic in your video?

Ok so remote but all the people in the planes dying was faked? This huge conspiracy seems extremely difficult to pull off. It's a terribly sad day, repeal the patriot act keep it moving.

Lol are you kidding me. Airliners are extremely stable, and the twin towers were huge landmarks so they could start aiming for them 10s of miles out. Very little maneuvering was necessary. Anyone with a minimum of training could do it

Autopilot to the rescue.

Never freaking fails

People always seem astonished finding out there is holes like this. You can hit any point on the map just by entering the destination. And the machine is blind. It don't care about obstacles as a few mountains will testify.

The entire 9/11 narrative was such bullshit. The biggest false flag in history

A plane didn’t hit the Pentagon..

@grok what was IAS for planes that hit the towers on 911?

Brad, great to see all these older videos again. Thx!

This is retarded. It’s insanely easy to fly a jet into a building that big. The pentagon? Sure, that’s much more difficult and we can have that conversation. And I’m calling bullshit on him not being able to control a 172. A dog can fly and land a 172.

It was an inside job man Stop talking about it already

This is retarded. It's not difficult to hit a giant skyscraper in a plane. It *is* difficult to hit the exact same spot, at the same speed, bank angle, altitude, and heading.

They clearly dont know the sky king

If I may, Idon't believe it is THAT impossible. Is the steering wheel thingy freely wobbling and is sensitive to you hand movements even if you just breath? I'm guessing it is not. So, if you're coming in from a distance, all you have to do is just keep your "target" in focus...

No planes hit tower 7.

Not the same at all, anybody with 5 hours of flight experience and a sim can hit the biggest building in the world.

This is dumb, stop being dumb Flying a plane isn't as hard as they make it out to be. The hardest parts are take offs and landings, the hijackers did neither. All they had to do was steer

Northwoods2.001

Revolution needed to happen 50 years ago, now they monitor and track everything we do, but maybe it’s not too late.

•There were no airplanes used on 911. •The Twin Towers turned to dust as they fell. •Israeli “art” students spent months on the same floors that were hit. •Zero plane wreckage and no camera footage at the pentagon. •We have all been massively PsYOPED as usual.