正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Fable 5 and Karpathy's knowledge base trick are basically a cheat code. Someone just dropped a full walkthrough on building the most powerful second brain ever Andrej Karpathy shared a simple idea: use an LLM to build personal knowledge bases. Index your sources, let the model organize them, and...

47,331 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

36 条评论

Ofek Shaked | AI Engineer 的头像
Ofek Shaked | AI Engineer3 个月前

The index drifting when sources contradict or update is the part nobody shows in the demo. Without explicit contradiction detection and re-index triggers, the second brain quietly becomes a liability.

Shadow Nick 的头像
Shadow Nick3 个月前

interesting point 👀

Makaroni 的头像
Makaroni3 个月前

the obsidian second brain pipeline has been 'almost there' for 3 years this might actually be the one that doesnt fall apart after week two 🔥

Rich Odin 的头像
Rich Odin3 个月前

Fable 5 is already the coolest product to date

Shadow Nick 的头像
Shadow Nick3 个月前

I think it will be like this for a long time

WOWMAX.Exchange 的头像
WOWMAX.Exchange3 个月前

I was very surprised when I heard this

Shadow Nick 的头像
Shadow Nick3 个月前

I had a similar thing

Fokki 的头像
Fokki3 个月前

banger article

raiden 的头像
raiden3 个月前

insane gem. stealing this playbook

Shadow Nick 的头像
Shadow Nick3 个月前

no problem bro

Ridark 的头像
Ridark3 个月前

AI tools become genuine assets with real skill

Yarchi 的头像
Yarchi3 个月前

Whoa bro it changes everything

bondy 的头像
bondy3 个月前

Now I'm waiting for Andrej Karpathy to announce Fable 6

Shadow Nick 的头像
Shadow Nick3 个月前

time will tell, heh :)

krombet 的头像
krombet3 个月前

Thanks for such a useful and cool tip 🤝

Shadow Nick 的头像
Shadow Nick3 个月前

I'm glad you liked it

Exlipse 的头像
Exlipse3 个月前

This Chinese guy surprised me a lot

ai 男性 的头像
ai 男性3 个月前

It's sooo good! I'm using it to better my knowledge about ecommerce

marfin 的头像
marfin3 个月前

i adore fable 5

RapidFetch 的头像
RapidFetch2 个月前

The blind spot in most second brains is video. What you learn on YouTube stays locked in audio your model can't index. Pull the transcript first: YouTube's own transcript panel for one video, or yt-dlp if you code. Then feed it in like any other source.

State of The Art™ - AI / AGI (e/acc) 的头像
State of The Art™ - AI / AGI (e/acc)3 个月前

Second brain on autopilot neat

0xBakeer 的头像
0xBakeer3 个月前

Love the energy, and the pattern genuinely works — but there’s a second half to this story most threads skip. Worth 2 minutes before you commit your whole vault:

Piggle 的头像
Piggle3 个月前

thanks for new banger bro

Ventry 的头像
Ventry3 个月前

second brain is the best thing there can be

Insomnia 的头像
Insomnia3 个月前

I watching all video this guy

Dipanshu Kushwaha 的头像
Dipanshu Kushwaha3 个月前

Nice. This combo sounds game-changing—totally agree that indexing sources + LLMs makes a strong second brain. Let’s see it in action.

Mikadzyki🌙 的头像
Mikadzyki🌙3 个月前

A second brain that grows as you add sources sounds great

DEV 的头像
DEV3 个月前

Indexing is just the start. The real challenge is retrieval efficiency in dynamic datasets.

卖飞哥 🐊(互 F 🤝 学习) 的头像
卖飞哥 🐊(互 F 🤝 学习)3 个月前

个人知识库接上LLM后,价值不在存得多,而在能把分散材料串起来。只要源文件干净、结构稳定,后面扩展到不同代理会很顺。

0xSlyth 的头像
0xSlyth3 个月前

legit

Adel Bucetta 的头像
Adel Bucetta3 个月前

that's the real unlock, not some magic trick or 'cheat code', but collapsing the time between research and application. when you can build on top of existing knowledge like this, that's when the real progress happens.

Esther Villa 的头像
Esther Villa3 个月前

Sounds like a tidy way to make chaos feel organized. Still waiting to see how often it holds up outside the demo.

Dima T. 的头像
Dima T.3 个月前

The LLM-indexing-into-Obsidian idea is genuinely something Karpathy has discussed, and it's a real working pattern. But "Opus 4.8 took a full day and came out worse" is a specific comparison with no benchmarks or examples shown — reads more like promotion for a particular model than a reproducible test.

Shiyam Kashfiq 的头像
Shiyam Kashfiq3 个月前

Impressive, the ability to auto‑link across sources truly elevates a second brain. Shows how LLMs can move from guessing to genuine knowledge

Aura-Intel 的头像
Aura-Intel3 个月前

No. Simply put. This is grifter influencer guru BS. You can’t outsource graph linkage for effective traversal without defined logical models etc. this is amateur 101. Stop posting this BS.

Archive 的头像
Archive3 个月前

gonna throw this to my ai agent starting to set up obsidian today!

相关视频

THIS GUY BUILT A BUSINESS SECOND BRAIN WITH CLAUDE CODE + OBSIDIAN IN 3 STEPS Most teams do not need another Notion workspace. They need a place where the company can remember how it works. The video shows a simple setup: 1. Create one empty folder called second brain. 2. Split it into 3 buckets: raw new knowledge wiki 3. Let Claude Code turn messy company material into connected notes. The useful part is the separation. Raw is where your existing stuff goes: SOPs, sales docs, process notes, client delivery checklists, old Loom summaries, onboarding docs. New knowledge is where fresh outside material lands: articles, clips, tactics, examples, market notes. Wiki is the cleaned version: concepts, roles, processes, SOPs, gaps, reusable decisions. That is where Claude Code becomes more useful than a normal chat window. Instead of asking it to remember random context forever, you give it a folder it can read, edit, and reorganize. Then Obsidian becomes the human interface. The Obsidian Web Clipper captures useful pages into the vault. Claude Code ingests them. The wiki gets updated. Then you can ask questions like: “Does my current workflow actually hold up?” That is the real point. Not “AI notes.” A business memory system that can compare what you do today against new information tomorrow. The caveat: this is not magic company intelligence. If your raw docs are vague, outdated, or full of tribal knowledge, Claude will organize weak inputs into cleaner weak outputs. You still need naming rules, review habits, and someone responsible for deleting junk. But the setup is refreshingly practical. Folder first. Clipper second. Claude Code as the maintainer. No giant knowledge base migration. No complex setup. Just a local vault that can slowly turn scattered business memory into something searchable, editable, and actually reusable.

kocer

16,698 次观看 • 3 个月前

Obsidian + Claude Code turned a 4,300-note vault into a second brain that answers back. Most people use Obsidian as a graveyard. You save 40 highlights a week, link nothing, and reread maybe 2% of it. The knowledge is there the retrieval is dead. Claude Code fixes the retrieval, because your vault is just a folder of markdown files and Claude Code lives in folders. The whole setup takes 20 minutes: Open a terminal inside your Obsidian folder and run Claude Code no plugins, no API glue, no export step. It reads all 4,300 files natively. Then drop a CLAUDE.md at the vault root explaining your structure: where daily notes live, how you tag, what your MOCs are. Now every session starts with context instead of chaos. From there you just talk to your vault: > "find every note where I mentioned churn and write a summary with backlinks" > "read my last 30 daily notes and list the 5 ideas I keep circling but never ship" > "build a MOC for everything tagged startup-ideas and link the orphan notes into it" It writes new notes straight into the vault with proper [[wikilinks]], and they show up in your graph view 10 seconds later. The boring layer automates too one command cleans broken links, one merges duplicates, one turns 6 months of meeting notes into a single decisions log. Work that used to eat a Sunday now runs while you make coffee. Before: 4,300 notes, 900 orphans, search by keyword and prayer. After: an agent that read everything you ever wrote and drafts in your own voice, from your own sources, with receipts. People pay $30/month for AI note apps with 10% of this. You already own the other 90%. Your notes stopped being storage. They started being staff.

Spike 1%

18,223 次观看 • 2 个月前

Obsidian + Claude Code is how Andrej Karpathy turns 15 years of notes into a brain that works while he sleeps. The method behind it costs $0 and takes 5 minutes a day and it outlived every productivity app since 2011. Every idea, link, and half-thought gets appended to the top of a single note, with no sorting, no folders, no tags. Once a week he scrolls through, and anything that still matters gets copied back to the top. Weak ideas sink. Strong ideas resurface 5, 10, 20 times and by the 20th pass your brain has already wired them into everything else you know. Repetition as a filter. That's the whole system. Now the 2026 upgrade almost nobody is running: Drop that note into an Obsidian vault and open the folder with Claude Code not the chat app, the terminal agent that reads files. 3 commands change everything: read my last 30 days of notes and find the 3 ideas I keep circling without acting on link every note mentioning this project into a CLAUDE.md of what I actually believe about it draft this week's post from the idea that resurfaced most Claude Code doesn't search your vault it walks it, follows the wikilinks, and hands you the patterns you were too close to see. Karpathy method filters the signal, Obsidian stores it, Claude Code compounds it. One is a habit, one is a folder, one is $20 a month together they're the closest thing to a second brain that thinks back. Most people collect notes for 10 years and never read them once. His notes read him.

Spike 1%

12,467 次观看 • 2 个月前