Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Fable 5 on Hyperagent is producing the most creative, ambitious work we've ever seen from our agents. They're self-improving for hours towards open-ended goals. Visual reasoning has spiked noticeably. Outputs are consistently higher quality than Opus, occasionally at lower cost. 5 of our test cases below vs. Opus 4.8... show more

Hyperagent

12,421 subscribers

1,341,294 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Eğitim Haberler & Politika Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

38 Yorum

Hyperagent profil fotoğrafı

Hyperagent5 ay önce

1. Visualize all asteroids in the solar system from NASA data Hyperagent ran Fable 5 to pull data and design the visual. Fable’s version included visual upgrades such as orbit traces and hover details while maintaining performance. See it:

Hyperagent profil fotoğrafı

Hyperagent5 ay önce

2. Design a site plan for a 100 acre fitness retreat Hyperagent orchestrated image gen with GPT-Image-2 and Nano Banana to bring the property to life. Fable’s version considered flow patterns, while Opus 4.8 essentially dropped boxes onto a plot. See it:

Hyperagent profil fotoğrafı

Hyperagent5 ay önce

3. Reconstruct Apollo control panels from technical PDFs Hyperagent reasoned over the diagrams and documentation to create a faithful 3D simulation. Opus 4.8’s attempt skimmed over key details.

Hyperagent profil fotoğrafı

Hyperagent5 ay önce

4. Simulate the supply chain for World Cup jersey sales based on match outcomes Fable took a global view. Opus 4.8 narrowed its scope to US only and shipped glaring visual bugs (flickering).

Hyperagent profil fotoğrafı

Hyperagent5 ay önce

5. Show the effects of solar flares on aurora Hyperagent used Fable 5 to research and design a full simulation. Opus's artifact didn't load, despite claiming to have tested the work.

Ziwen profil fotoğrafı

Ziwen5 ay önce

Looks on fire!!! I also tried the Minecraft prompts and one shot it

Lydia Hallie ✨ profil fotoğrafı

Lydia Hallie ✨5 ay önce

This looks SO good 🔥🔥

Peter Mick profil fotoğrafı

Peter Mick5 ay önce

this reconstruction really is mind blowing

Thomas Ahle profil fotoğrafı

Thomas Ahle5 ay önce

I have an app built for Opus 4.8 over two weeks. It has a lot of visual glitches. Should I start over with Fable, or ask Fable to fix it?

Beginnersblog profil fotoğrafı

Beginnersblog5 ay önce

The Apollo control panel one stopped me. Reconstructing real hardware from technical PDFs is the kind of task you'd normally hand a team for weeks. The fact that it's chewing on open-ended goals for hours and getting better is the part that's hard to wrap my head around.

Yassine Zaanouni profil fotoğrafı

Yassine Zaanouni5 ay önce

I can't believe I was able to create this with Fable

Wesley profil fotoğrafı

Wesley5 ay önce

🔥 Really impressive stuff! Fable 5 has absolutely cooked Opus on these. That Apollo panel and solar flare viz are something else.

Awa K. Penn profil fotoğrafı

Awa K. Penn5 ay önce

Fable 5 looks so realistic. Just wow

Gina Acosta profil fotoğrafı

Gina Acosta5 ay önce

This feels like the right direction for agents. Less hype, more work that actually holds up

Voight profil fotoğrafı

Voight5 ay önce

Fable, the most desired model.

Galaxyhub Labs profil fotoğrafı

Galaxyhub Labs5 ay önce

It's always important to look at the scope of all models, and Fable is undoubtedly leading the way at the moment.

Anissa profil fotoğrafı

Anissa5 ay önce

Fable 5 sounds seriously impressive

ᴍᴜʀᴘʜʏ profil fotoğrafı

ᴍᴜʀᴘʜʏ5 ay önce

Fable 5 sounds quite interesting

MisterCarrillo profil fotoğrafı

MisterCarrillo5 ay önce

Everyone is comparing models. The real comparison is: What can an agent accomplish after 3 hours of autonomous work? That's where things get interesting.

Shahid Wani profil fotoğrafı

Shahid Wani5 ay önce

Woww fable 5 sound 😱

Aaliya profil fotoğrafı

Aaliya5 ay önce

The use cases are creative and interesting.

Carl downey profil fotoğrafı

Carl downey5 ay önce

good

Ryker Stone profil fotoğrafı

Ryker Stone4 ay önce

"This is bigger than most people realize. The real story isn't the ban — it's that one government just showed every other government exactly how to do it."

Shiro profil fotoğrafı

Shiro5 ay önce

İ think claude is becoming a overrated

The Operator | AI Ops for Creators profil fotoğrafı

The Operator | AI Ops for Creators5 ay önce

All the Fable demos are all fancy UI / 3D generations. Is this a 3D Artist model or an LLM

K!A🚀 profil fotoğrafı

K!A🚀5 ay önce

Fable feels less like a model, more like a working session.

Snow profil fotoğrafı

Snow5 ay önce

this is superb

mirajul profil fotoğrafı

mirajul5 ay önce

🤖 AI & ChatGPT Guides

TOny-fishkiller profil fotoğrafı

TOny-fishkiller5 ay önce

that's amazing！

Michael Suede profil fotoğrafı

Michael Suede5 ay önce

wow nice

ZLH profil fotoğrafı

ZLH5 ay önce

Amazing

Aditya Rana profil fotoğrafı

Aditya Rana5 ay önce

Looks super cool , there is no way it created it in those single line prompts through .

Ori Torii profil fotoğrafı

Ori Torii5 ay önce

Amazing! How about building websites? Any examples?

SparkTwo⚡️ はると⚡️17歳のAI自動化屋 profil fotoğrafı

SparkTwo⚡️ はると⚡️17歳のAI自動化屋5 ay önce

Claude APIで自動化パイプライン組んでいて、Fable 5に切り替えてから複数ステップの処理精度が体感30～40%上がった。Opus比でコスト下がって品質上がるのは設計の選択肢が広がる

Al-Shamus profil fotoğrafı

Al-Shamus5 ay önce

This looks impressive

Teknikforce profil fotoğrafı

Teknikforce3 ay önce

The biggest win isn't just having a better AI assistant. It's reducing the friction between thinking and doing. The same applies to content creation. Instead of spending hours editing product videos, tools like Vidicom can turn a product page into ready to publish marketing videos for YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and more.

Shubham Sharma | AI & Tech profil fotoğrafı

Shubham Sharma | AI & Tech5 ay önce

All the Fable demos are all fancy UI / 3D generations. Is this a 3D Artist model or an LLM

Faizan Shah profil fotoğrafı

Faizan Shah5 ay önce

AI tools hallucinate. Confidently. Every day. Verity automatically fact-checks AI responses with cited web sources. Free Chrome extension 👇 #AI #ChatGPT #Claude #ChromeExtension

Benzer Videolar

Fable 5 and Sonnet 5 really need each other We ran every Claude model on Hyperagent to build a creative data viz about goals scored at the World Cup Here's how they did 👇

Fable 5 and Sonnet 5 really need each other We ran every Claude model on Hyperagent to build a creative data viz about goals scored at the World Cup Here's how they did 👇

Hyperagent

257,723 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT 5.6 Sol & Terra just made Fable 5's pricing look like a joke! We gave OpenAI's top models (Sol, Terra) and Anthropic's top models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8) the same 3 prompts: • Supernova boom • Meteor hitting a city • Solar system model The bill: Sol: $4.77 Terra: $1.24 Fable 5: $9.94 Opus 4.8: $2.46 Outputs came out surprisingly close. The prices didn't. Fable 5 cost unreasonably more than everything else, with Sol not far behind. Considering latest Fable 5 nerf, it's hard to see what you're paying for.

GPT 5.6 Sol & Terra just made Fable 5's pricing look like a joke! We gave OpenAI's top models (Sol, Terra) and Anthropic's top models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8) the same 3 prompts: • Supernova boom • Meteor hitting a city • Solar system model The bill: Sol: $4.77 Terra: $1.24 Fable 5: $9.94 Opus 4.8: $2.46 Outputs came out surprisingly close. The prices didn't. Fable 5 cost unreasonably more than everything else, with Sol not far behind. Considering latest Fable 5 nerf, it's hard to see what you're paying for.

AI/ML API

149,978 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Astra vs Fable 5 : Jump is same like opus 4.8 to fable 5 in quality side by side comparison on same prompts , this is why i am super hyped for openai < astra is the path to the bell of AGI iykyk>

Astra vs Fable 5 : Jump is same like opus 4.8 to fable 5 in quality side by side comparison on same prompts , this is why i am super hyped for openai < astra is the path to the bell of AGI iykyk>

Chetaslua

296,201 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Bhavy☄️

32,985 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Anthropic's managed agents team just showed the Fable 5 workflow most people haven't seen Their line was simple: Fable 5 is our best model for running self-improving agent systems" Fable 5 + loops + dynamic workflows + dreaming = self-improving agents 13 minutes Live from Anthropic's Japan stage Built from scratch Worth more than a $500 agent building course Bookmark and watch it before this becomes the default setup

Anthropic's managed agents team just showed the Fable 5 workflow most people haven't seen Their line was simple: Fable 5 is our best model for running self-improving agent systems" Fable 5 + loops + dynamic workflows + dreaming = self-improving agents 13 minutes Live from Anthropic's Japan stage Built from scratch Worth more than a $500 agent building course Bookmark and watch it before this becomes the default setup

rari

32,304 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Did I just unlock claude-fable-5-lite? 😂 Since Fable 5 got pulled (US export control order, Anthropic is contesting it), I wanted to see how much of its character lives in the system prompt vs. the model itself. I ran the leaked Fable 5 prompt on Opus 4.8 head-to-head against stock 4.8.

Did I just unlock claude-fable-5-lite? 😂 Since Fable 5 got pulled (US export control order, Anthropic is contesting it), I wanted to see how much of its character lives in the system prompt vs. the model itself. I ran the leaked Fable 5 prompt on Opus 4.8 head-to-head against stock 4.8.

Jamieson O'Reilly

2,740,958 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Anthropic Head of Product: "Fable 5 is the best model we've ever shipped for agentic work. Our engineers now ship 8x more code than they did in past years." in 42 minutes, the Anthropic team shows how to build self-improving agent systems with Fable 5: managed agents, dreaming, dynamic workflows worth more than a $500 agent building course live from Anthropic's latest stage in Japan, just hours ago i turned everything they showed on stage into a step-by-step guide on building your own agent you can find the full guide below

Anthropic Head of Product: "Fable 5 is the best model we've ever shipped for agentic work. Our engineers now ship 8x more code than they did in past years." in 42 minutes, the Anthropic team shows how to build self-improving agent systems with Fable 5: managed agents, dreaming, dynamic workflows worth more than a $500 agent building course live from Anthropic's latest stage in Japan, just hours ago i turned everything they showed on stage into a step-by-step guide on building your own agent you can find the full guide below

Anatoli Kopadze

81,371 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

We tested Kimi K3 against Claude Fable 5 on 3D modeling and animation Asked both to recreate the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars in 1) pixel style 2) original style. Both are on Max effort. Kimi K3 took a bit longer than Fable 5 to generate, but came in ~1/3 cheaper on the 1st test, and less than half the cost on the 2nd. Interestingly, Kimi K3 handled the details at the same level as Fable 5 on the original creation, yet it wasn't at Fable's level for the pixel style. Test 1 (Pixel) Kimi K3: 1hr 11min · $14.5 Fable 5: 49min · $21 Test 2 (Original) Kimi K3: 1hr 17min · $19.3 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $47.2

We tested Kimi K3 against Claude Fable 5 on 3D modeling and animation Asked both to recreate the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars in 1) pixel style 2) original style. Both are on Max effort. Kimi K3 took a bit longer than Fable 5 to generate, but came in ~1/3 cheaper on the 1st test, and less than half the cost on the 2nd. Interestingly, Kimi K3 handled the details at the same level as Fable 5 on the original creation, yet it wasn't at Fable's level for the pixel style. Test 1 (Pixel) Kimi K3: 1hr 11min · $14.5 Fable 5: 49min · $21 Test 2 (Original) Kimi K3: 1hr 17min · $19.3 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $47.2

GMI Cloud

81,203 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Anthropic Managed Agents team: "Fable 5 - is our best model for self-improving agent systems. add /loops, dynamic workflows, dreaming - and you're unstoppable." in 13 minutes, the Anthropic team shows how to build self-improving agent systems with Fable 5 from scratch. Worth more than a $500 agent-building course. Live from the Anthropic stage in Japan. Unpublished

Anthropic Managed Agents team: "Fable 5 - is our best model for self-improving agent systems. add /loops, dynamic workflows, dreaming - and you're unstoppable." in 13 minutes, the Anthropic team shows how to build self-improving agent systems with Fable 5 from scratch. Worth more than a $500 agent-building course. Live from the Anthropic stage in Japan. Unpublished

Movez

67,091 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Anthropic just dropped 5 workshops, revealing the latest capabilities of Fable 5: • 00:00 - deep look into Fable 5 • 11:22 - Fable 5 and the capability curve • 30:54 - building managed agents with Fable 5 • 44:29 - real use cases of Fable 5 by teams • 57:43 - how to deploy agents with Fable 5 These 1-hour of sessions will replace 100 articles on how to actually use Fable 5. Watch them today, then read the best practices from the sessions in the article below.

Anthropic just dropped 5 workshops, revealing the latest capabilities of Fable 5: • 00:00 - deep look into Fable 5 • 11:22 - Fable 5 and the capability curve • 30:54 - building managed agents with Fable 5 • 44:29 - real use cases of Fable 5 by teams • 57:43 - how to deploy agents with Fable 5 These 1-hour of sessions will replace 100 articles on how to actually use Fable 5. Watch them today, then read the best practices from the sessions in the article below.

Codez

555,750 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Addy Osmani

420,695 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is the best way to use Claude Fable in Claude Code without immediately hitting your limits. 1. Model set to Fable 5 2. Reasoning on Max 3. Instruct Claude to run a dynamic workflow where: 3a. Fable is the orchestrator 3b. Opus does the reasoning heavy phases Fable is so overpowered that you don't need its intelligence for every step. Let it orchestrate Opus or even Sonnet.

This is the best way to use Claude Fable in Claude Code without immediately hitting your limits. 1. Model set to Fable 5 2. Reasoning on Max 3. Instruct Claude to run a dynamic workflow where: 3a. Fable is the orchestrator 3b. Opus does the reasoning heavy phases Fable is so overpowered that you don't need its intelligence for every step. Let it orchestrate Opus or even Sonnet.

Dan McAteer

913,295 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Anthropic just released 3 workshops on how to actually use Fable 5 to its full potential: 00:00 - Full guide to Fable 5 19:02 - How Anthropic uses Fable 5 internally 44:46 - How to build effective agents with Fable those 3 stages replaced 20 articles on Fable 5 for me. give it 1-hour today and read how to build self-improving agents with Fable 5 in the article below.

Anthropic just released 3 workshops on how to actually use Fable 5 to its full potential: 00:00 - Full guide to Fable 5 19:02 - How Anthropic uses Fable 5 internally 44:46 - How to build effective agents with Fable those 3 stages replaced 20 articles on Fable 5 for me. give it 1-hour today and read how to build self-improving agents with Fable 5 in the article below.

Codez

54,182 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Anthropic Managed Agents team: "Fable 5 is our best model for running self-improving agent systems. Add /loops, dynamic workflows, dreaming and you are unstoppable" in 13-minutes, Anthropic team shows how to build self-improving agent systems with Fable 5 from scratch. Worth more than a $500 agent building course. Live from the last Anthropic stage in Japan. Unpublished.

Anthropic Managed Agents team: "Fable 5 is our best model for running self-improving agent systems. Add /loops, dynamic workflows, dreaming and you are unstoppable" in 13-minutes, Anthropic team shows how to build self-improving agent systems with Fable 5 from scratch. Worth more than a $500 agent building course. Live from the last Anthropic stage in Japan. Unpublished.

Codez

472,250 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

stevibe

60,788 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

BridgeMind

188,973 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

199,872 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Opus 5 is a modest upgrade, but it has tough competition in GPT-5.6 Sol Initial thoughts from our early access: > Clearer writing than Fable's dense communication style > Still gets too verbose compared to GPT models (even when explicitly instructed to keep text purposeful) > Strong on browser use inside Hyperagent > Strong on reviewing complex data to justify a decision > Less likely to take creative risks. More of a "rule follower" personality. Costs shown for five test cases (GPT-5.6 Sol was consistently much cheaper) Explore and judge the actual work for yourself in thread 👇

Opus 5 is a modest upgrade, but it has tough competition in GPT-5.6 Sol Initial thoughts from our early access: > Clearer writing than Fable's dense communication style > Still gets too verbose compared to GPT models (even when explicitly instructed to keep text purposeful) > Strong on browser use inside Hyperagent > Strong on reviewing complex data to justify a decision > Less likely to take creative risks. More of a "rule follower" personality. Costs shown for five test cases (GPT-5.6 Sol was consistently much cheaper) Explore and judge the actual work for yourself in thread 👇

Hyperagent

154,784 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce