Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different...

notjazii's profile picture

J A Z I I

9,116 subscribers

41,089 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?
0:20

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

148,798 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs Sol Astra: Took 11 minutes. This is from a follow-up after the first attempt had rendering and UI bugs. The smoke feels a little off. I expected more detail, but it did a good job understanding the intent. Cost: $12.85. Fable 5.1: Took 18 minutes to complete the same test with high detailing. Cost: $12.60. Kimi K3: Took 10 minutes with a similar level of output and cost only $6.95. SOL: Took 7 minutes, but the output seemed messy. Cost: $5.78. Personally, I like Kimi K3 for delivering similar quality with better token efficiency, followed by fable 5.1 for realism. What about you? I’ll do a couple more tests before coming to a conclusion.
0:19

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs Sol Astra: Took 11 minutes. This is from a follow-up after the first attempt had rendering and UI bugs. The smoke feels a little off. I expected more detail, but it did a good job understanding the intent. Cost: $12.85. Fable 5.1: Took 18 minutes to complete the same test with high detailing. Cost: $12.60. Kimi K3: Took 10 minutes with a similar level of output and cost only $6.95. SOL: Took 7 minutes, but the output seemed messy. Cost: $5.78. Personally, I like Kimi K3 for delivering similar quality with better token efficiency, followed by fable 5.1 for realism. What about you? I’ll do a couple more tests before coming to a conclusion.

Bhavy☄️

78,441 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I gave Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol the same prompt. Its not even close Opus took 12.7 minutes and $2.86. Sol took 11.4 minutes and $1.09. Prompt below.
0:20

I gave Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol the same prompt. Its not even close Opus took 12.7 minutes and $2.86. Sol took 11.4 minutes and $1.09. Prompt below.

Hunter Bohm

243,847 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol in silhouette animation. Generated with Seedance 2.5.
0:15

Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol in silhouette animation. Generated with Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

17,606 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Same brief through both: GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5. Both outputs generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:15

Same brief through both: GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5. Both outputs generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

30,882 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Gemini 4 argon vs GPT 6.1 sol both models were tested with same prompt but results came out really different > sol was tested by me in devin cloud at default reasoning > gemini was tested by lentils earlier this month on pre release checkpoint argon isn’t publicly available yet, so can’t say how good offical checkpoint is, but this one looks pretty good already which one did better?
0:19

Gemini 4 argon vs GPT 6.1 sol both models were tested with same prompt but results came out really different > sol was tested by me in devin cloud at default reasoning > gemini was tested by lentils earlier this month on pre release checkpoint argon isn’t publicly available yet, so can’t say how good offical checkpoint is, but this one looks pretty good already which one did better?

J A Z I I

14,442 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol, motion eval in limited-palette animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.
0:15

Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol, motion eval in limited-palette animation. Made with Seedance 2.5.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

15,839 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads
0:14

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads

Romain Torres

2,110,845 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP
0:15

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP

Romain Torres

400,566 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP
0:13

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP

Romain Torres

188,363 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Fable 5.1 vs Sol 5.6 - Anime scene comparison test We know Fable 5.1 is the best there is, but can it handle head to head task for specific anime style video against the very capable sol 5.6? What do you think it nailed it?
0:17

Fable 5.1 vs Sol 5.6 - Anime scene comparison test We know Fable 5.1 is the best there is, but can it handle head to head task for specific anime style video against the very capable sol 5.6? What do you think it nailed it?

Ori Silver

65,028 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

this is f**king dangerous someone ran GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 side by side. same prompt. same task. one shot each. both nailed it first try. Sol just finished faster. nobody expected that. Fable 5 was supposed to dominate long reasoning without competition. you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit save and bookmark it no matter what
0:15

this is f**king dangerous someone ran GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 side by side. same prompt. same task. one shot each. both nailed it first try. Sol just finished faster. nobody expected that. Fable 5 was supposed to dominate long reasoning without competition. you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit save and bookmark it no matter what

Khairallah AL-Awady

689,242 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?
0:17

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

Bhavy☄️

42,313 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in action-figure animation, both generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:15

GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in action-figure animation, both generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

46,599 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle the same brief. Outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:15

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle the same brief. Outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

30,883 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle monster battle brief. Both outputs made with Seedance 2.0.
0:13

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle monster battle brief. Both outputs made with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

31,896 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, evaluated on an action scene. Both outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:15

GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, evaluated on an action scene. Both outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

33,540 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Side-by-side comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5. Both outputs generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:14

Side-by-side comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5. Both outputs generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

83,223 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?
0:17

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,729 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Same concept. Two AI assistants writing the prompt Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol animated by Seedance 2.0, powered by BytePlus Both prompts below so you can test them yourself
0:13

Same concept. Two AI assistants writing the prompt Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol animated by Seedance 2.0, powered by BytePlus Both prompts below so you can test them yourself

Magnific

11,475 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад