Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Fable Ultracode vs GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra Frontend design comparison test First website is from Fable Fable took 5min vs GPT took 30min Which one do you think is better?

Jun Song

46,158 subscribers

22,865 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

21 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jun Song

Jun Songvor 3 Monaten

I like the contents from Fable's website, however recommending old models like llama is really wrong.

Profilbild von Sakura Yuki

Sakura Yukivor 3 Monaten

This is basically an effort-budget benchmark. One model got 6x the search time, so the screenshot says less about raw model quality than people think.

Profilbild von Alex Miller

Alex Millervor 3 Monaten

The interesting comparison isn't just which page looks better. It's which model gets you to a production ready design with fewer iterations.

Profilbild von 1337hero

1337herovor 3 Monaten

They both suck. Because they're uninspired. They look like things we've all seen a million times before. Yes, they're clean, modern and laid out proper. But is any of it, original? It's just so generic.

Profilbild von Barncore

Barncorevor 3 Monaten

2nd one is way cooler looking 1st one isn't bad, it's just generic af

Profilbild von Knowix

Knowixvor 3 Monaten

GPT got better Ui

Profilbild von Aden

Adenvor 3 Monaten

does 6x faster matter more than which one looks nicer here

Profilbild von Mateusz Mirkowski

Mateusz Mirkowskivor 3 Monaten

GPT results looks very GLM or Kimi style. :D

Profilbild von Lucas | 🇦🇺

Lucas | 🇦🇺vor 3 Monaten

The big lime green one looks less AI generated

Profilbild von jay uhdinger

jay uhdingervor 3 Monaten

Wow GPT all the way!

Profilbild von Leonardo Gonçalves

Leonardo Gonçalvesvor 3 Monaten

Grok Grok Grok 🥹😬🫶

Profilbild von gibberish

gibberishvor 3 Monaten

you should have really refined your prompt. You're not pushing either model, and many smart models when unpushed, just revert to lazy. You could have gotten so much more out of both models. First you need to ideate with ai, then come up with a comprehensive prompt to push them.

Profilbild von non2xx

non2xxvor 3 Monaten

fable 압승

Profilbild von 황금나무invest

황금나무investvor 3 Monaten

Fable win

Profilbild von Rafa

Rafavor 3 Monaten

with all due respect.. gpt looks kinda mid, it tries too hard, fable came out worse, yes, but i think it's kind of expected congrats to gpt on this one, but fable will outshine gpt any day in actually day-to-day web coding, or any frontend coding, it just needs more context.

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 3 Monaten

First one is 5.6 right?

Profilbild von Jun Song

Jun Songvor 3 Monaten

First one is fable

Profilbild von Matthew Belcher

Matthew Belchervor 3 Monaten

My 5.6 is loving neobrutal everything.

Profilbild von IMRAN - Zebracross

IMRAN - Zebracrossvor 3 Monaten

Fable

Profilbild von _

_vor 3 Monaten

Fable one looks like it was generated by gemma 3 12b 😂

Profilbild von Ivars ✨

Ivars ✨vor 3 Monaten

After all, they're different prompts.

Ähnliche Videos

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

199,872 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Someone ran this test Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Select your model wisely!

Someone ran this test Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Select your model wisely!

0xMarioNawfal

73,224 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kai

15,769 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1. which one win ?

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1. which one win ?

YouArt

50,026 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 both models were tested on the same reasoning with the same prompt > 5.6 Sol one shotted everything in 70 minutes in devin > Fable 5 one-shotted everything in 90 minutes in claude code really surprised by Sol results here which one do you think won?

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 both models were tested on the same reasoning with the same prompt > 5.6 Sol one shotted everything in 70 minutes in devin > Fable 5 one-shotted everything in 90 minutes in claude code really surprised by Sol results here which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

79,418 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

377,957 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,279 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Fable 5, Grok 4.5 and GPT-5.6 ran the same builds simultaneously. Grok finished first, Fable made the best website, GPT handled the deepest code.

Fable 5, Grok 4.5 and GPT-5.6 ran the same builds simultaneously. Grok finished first, Fable made the best website, GPT handled the deepest code.

0xMarioNawfal

46,213 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

107,777 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

K2S

242,890 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.6 Sol Tests 🔥 - Frontend Design - Simulations - Games and Models OpenAI have made significant improvements across the board, we are truly in a new era of models... Do you think it beats Fable? 🤔

GPT-5.6 Sol Tests 🔥 - Frontend Design - Simulations - Games and Models OpenAI have made significant improvements across the board, we are truly in a new era of models... Do you think it beats Fable? 🤔

Fix

229,389 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I asked the new GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra vs Fable XHigh to "create an app to compare the fastest growing stocks in diff time periods" Here are the results. I then asked both to create a comparison video. Sol couldn't do it, so here's what Fable made. Check out how they compare!

I asked the new GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra vs Fable XHigh to "create an app to compare the fastest growing stocks in diff time periods" Here are the results. I then asked both to create a comparison video. Sol couldn't do it, so here's what Fable made. Check out how they compare!

Deedy

86,368 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

Command Code

79,680 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

aditya

556,795 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Command Code

22,894 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

so GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra + Fable oneshotted this working together, basically insane. You should subscribe, I'm not making the rules

so GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra + Fable oneshotted this working together, basically insane. You should subscribe, I'm not making the rules

raz

54,890 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

$Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.$

Fable 5.1 orchestrates GPT-5.6 Luna agents. Via the 'fable-advisor' plugin for Claude Code. 1. Fable 5.1 orchestrates 2. GPT-5.6 Luna implements 3. Fable 5.1 reviews Think of it like in-context distillation: give Luna the intelligence of Fable 5.1 at a fraction the cost.

Dan McAteer

156,614 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I spent $241 testing GPT 5.6 vs Fable 5 here are the brutally honest results

I spent $241 testing GPT 5.6 vs Fable 5 here are the brutally honest results

Robin Ebers

16,420 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Astra vs Fable 5 (not fable 5.1) build a 3d aquarium game using single prompt with reference image from gpt-6-astra astra >> fable 5 confirmed, now time to test against fable 5.1

Tim Jayas

840,774 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat