正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

FACT-CHECK. Claims made by Sanyuka TV presenter , Ray P that a president has a right to kill any Ugandan are factually false. Art. 22 of the Constitution protects right to life to the extent that no one must be intentionally deprived of the right to life. #FactCheckWithBuule

45,143 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Gabriel Buule 的头像
Gabriel Buule1 年前

On a lighter note, it's false that the president is "God"... leaders don't do a favor to do what they are supposed to do. @adam_kungu , thank u for standing your ground.

Gabriel Buule 的头像
Gabriel Buule1 年前

@nbstv If you ever come across any information that you doubt, tag my name and end with #FactCheckWithBuule I will respond immediately.

Napoleone Ehmah 的头像
Napoleone Ehmah1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv There’s always a problem when you allow empty-heads get close to a microphone. Sadly many TVs and Radios in Uganda love those empty-heads.

Ensi Egumire Baasi 🥹 的头像
Ensi Egumire Baasi 🥹1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv She's stupid just maybe missing a small stick

David katimbo 的头像
David katimbo1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv I normally don't curse but she is an ashole

Mutunzí 的头像
Mutunzí1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv Kabampaane and unscripted discussions!

Andrew Kyamagero Omuntu Wawansi. 的头像
Andrew Kyamagero Omuntu Wawansi.1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv I want to comment with an audio.

Namukowa Peter (Dip, BA, Msc) 的头像
Namukowa Peter (Dip, BA, Msc)1 年前

When uninformed confidence is paired with ignorance, it can undermine the quality of television programs and potentially jeopardize human rights. The media plays a crucial role in educating the public about their rights, and this role is compromised when ignorance and baseless confidence are prevalent.

Lwasa Emmanuel Kaweesi ✪ 的头像
Lwasa Emmanuel Kaweesi ✪1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv Oyo omwana rayco musiru

Gabriel Buule 的头像
Gabriel Buule1 年前

@sanyukatv @nbstv 😂

相关视频

THE CONVERSATION BEGINS HERE: What does the law provide about demonstrations? 1. Article 37 of the Constitution provides that every person has the right to PEACEBLY and UNARMED to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket, and to present petitions to public authorities. 2. The right to assemble demonstrate, picket and present petitions to public authorities is hence exercisable under Article 37 of the Constitution under two conditional precedents which must be met: PEACEBLY and UNARMED. Have the maandamano we have witnessed being done PEACEBLY and by UNARMED persons? 3. Suffice it to note that the right to assemble, demonstrate and to picket is not an absolute right. 4. Article 24 of the Constitution provides that the right to assemble, demonstrate and to picket is one of the rights that can be limited vide legislation to ensure that the enjoyment of rights and fundamental freedoms by any individuals does not prejudice the rights and freedoms of others. Have the maandamano not taken away the right to property of Kenyans with the mass destruction not only of private property but public property? 5. Article 259(1)(b) of the Constitution provides that the Constitution shall be interpreted in a manner that advances the rule of law, and the human rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of rights. To what extent do the maandamano fall within the defined parameters of the Constitution in particular the Bill of Rights? Is looting, destruction of property, anarchy and hooliganism the definition of demonstrations? Certainly not. These are purely criminal acts that have no constitutional basis! The conversation should begin here.

Hon. Aden Duale, EGH

101,326 次观看 • 3 年前