Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Fae Johnstone has accessed approximately $1.3 million in public money through nonprofit organizations. There is a lot of jargon on their websites, but how does that translate into actual value for taxpayers? We could not get any clarification. #cdnpoli #Toronto #ProtestMania

Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist

68,926 subscribers

279,987 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics #cdnpoli #Toronto #ProtestMania

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Turning Point USA is a 501(c)(3). Publicly available documents reveal that its employee not only purchased a $2 million house but also acquired the surrounding 6 plots of land for millions. Only $1.3 million of that land was financed. That is a lot of money, but the sum total is quite possibly higher. Even on the conservative side this salaried employee of a nonprofit, who does not come from family money, has north of $3.3 million in real estate alone. 👀EMBEZZLE MUCH?

Turning Point USA is a 501(c)(3). Publicly available documents reveal that its employee not only purchased a $2 million house but also acquired the surrounding 6 plots of land for millions. Only $1.3 million of that land was financed. That is a lot of money, but the sum total is quite possibly higher. Even on the conservative side this salaried employee of a nonprofit, who does not come from family money, has north of $3.3 million in real estate alone. 👀EMBEZZLE MUCH?

Travis

1,590,263 views • 5 months ago

Can we talk about how the Western Standard promised their audience that they wouldn't take any government funding whatsoever... But still got their hands on over $300,000 of taxpayers money in a single year? #abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli

Can we talk about how the Western Standard promised their audience that they wouldn't take any government funding whatsoever... But still got their hands on over $300,000 of taxpayers money in a single year? #abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli

The Breakdown

49,359 views • 1 year ago

🚨 | Margaret Thatcher - ‘The state has no source of money other than the money that people earn themselves. There is no such thing as public money there is only taxpayers money’ 💥 1st female Prime Minister understood public finances, the 1st female Chancellor does not. 💷 Rachel Reeves is robbing the public blind through taxation. 💡 Remember there is no public sector without the tax from the private sector. 🧨 The Labour Party are doing their best to ruin the private sector.

🚨 | Margaret Thatcher - ‘The state has no source of money other than the money that people earn themselves. There is no such thing as public money there is only taxpayers money’ 💥 1st female Prime Minister understood public finances, the 1st female Chancellor does not. 💷 Rachel Reeves is robbing the public blind through taxation. 💡 Remember there is no public sector without the tax from the private sector. 🧨 The Labour Party are doing their best to ruin the private sector.

Jamie Jenkins

974,393 views • 1 year ago

$1 million is a lot of money, can get someone saying anything. That Mukanya was part of the cake is understandable but for him to ask the suffering masses why they are not arresting Wicknell is some level of shame. How does he propose they do that.

$1 million is a lot of money, can get someone saying anything. That Mukanya was part of the cake is understandable but for him to ask the suffering masses why they are not arresting Wicknell is some level of shame. How does he propose they do that.

Dhara Blessed Mhlanga

95,795 views • 1 month ago

‘A scandal of epic proportions!’ Alex Armstrong slams Ed Miliband over a recent climate aid scandal, arguing that a public enquiry is needed into how taxpayers' money is being spent on building a road through the Amazon rainforest in Guyana.

‘A scandal of epic proportions!’ Alex Armstrong slams Ed Miliband over a recent climate aid scandal, arguing that a public enquiry is needed into how taxpayers' money is being spent on building a road through the Amazon rainforest in Guyana.

GB News

36,168 views • 10 months ago

We live in a society awash in wealth. Big banks and big oil pull in tens of billions while public needs go unmet. We need leaders willing to where the money is. A 1% tax on the wealthiest 1% could raise billions for strong, universal public services. Join the fight for a government that serves the many, not the money: #cdnpoli #ndp

We live in a society awash in wealth. Big banks and big oil pull in tens of billions while public needs go unmet. We need leaders willing to where the money is. A 1% tax on the wealthiest 1% could raise billions for strong, universal public services. Join the fight for a government that serves the many, not the money: #cdnpoli #ndp

Avi Lewis

40,330 views • 9 months ago

Malliotakis: We try to get to the bottom of where this money is going, $50 million for condoms in Gaza, for example. These are real things! Phillip: We know that there was not $50 million spent for condoms in Gaza. There was $0 spent on condoms in the Middle East. That is a complete lie

Malliotakis: We try to get to the bottom of where this money is going, $50 million for condoms in Gaza, for example. These are real things! Phillip: We know that there was not $50 million spent for condoms in Gaza. There was $0 spent on condoms in the Middle East. That is a complete lie

Acyn

1,158,467 views • 1 year ago

Moulton: War is tragic. Sometimes you sadly have to go to war. But we did not. Trump and Bibi dragged us into it. And now it's a horrible mess. A lot of people have lost their lives. A lot of taxpayers have lost their money, and we've got nothing in return

Moulton: War is tragic. Sometimes you sadly have to go to war. But we did not. Trump and Bibi dragged us into it. And now it's a horrible mess. A lot of people have lost their lives. A lot of taxpayers have lost their money, and we've got nothing in return

Acyn

20,840 views • 3 months ago

Ansem explains how memecoins could fix the social media model "It's discounted a lot, how large that group of people is that will invest or buy memes, but won't invest in stocks" "The reason Meta has value is because all the people on Instagram are spending a ton of time on that app, contributing a lot of value to the network with their time, their attention, etc" "But the people who are determining the value of this network typically don't have a stake in the upside" "If you can figure out a way to flip the social media model on its head, where the people who are the reason the network has value also have upside in the value of the network, there's a complete regime change on how all these things operate. One of the ways to do that is through memes"

Ansem explains how memecoins could fix the social media model "It's discounted a lot, how large that group of people is that will invest or buy memes, but won't invest in stocks" "The reason Meta has value is because all the people on Instagram are spending a ton of time on that app, contributing a lot of value to the network with their time, their attention, etc" "But the people who are determining the value of this network typically don't have a stake in the upside" "If you can figure out a way to flip the social media model on its head, where the people who are the reason the network has value also have upside in the value of the network, there's a complete regime change on how all these things operate. One of the ways to do that is through memes"

Market Bubble

18,364 views • 1 month ago

WOAH 🚨 Spencer Pratt just received an advanced copy of the House Judiciary Committee's report on Pacific Palisades Fire Aid Of the $100 million dollars of Fire Aid raised - $75 million has been LOST - $100,000 went to voter participation - $500,000 to political advocacy groups - $100,000 went to a podcasters - $500,000 went to bonuses, salaries, and money for consultants for nonprofit organizations “This is just the tip of the iceberg and more letters went out today demanding that the recipients of fire aid money prove how they spent their funds. $75 million has been lost, but the scam is over.”

WOAH 🚨 Spencer Pratt just received an advanced copy of the House Judiciary Committee's report on Pacific Palisades Fire Aid Of the $100 million dollars of Fire Aid raised - $75 million has been LOST - $100,000 went to voter participation - $500,000 to political advocacy groups - $100,000 went to a podcasters - $500,000 went to bonuses, salaries, and money for consultants for nonprofit organizations “This is just the tip of the iceberg and more letters went out today demanding that the recipients of fire aid money prove how they spent their funds. $75 million has been lost, but the scam is over.”

Wall Street Apes

516,889 views • 7 months ago

🚨GAYTON McKENZIE MUST GO! 💰 If R31 million in public spending is "not a lot of money" because it's government money, then South Africans are entitled to ask an obvious question: Why does the same government prosecute people accused of stealing thousands or millions of rand? Public money isn't "nobody's money"—it's taxpayers' money. Every rand should be treated with accountability, whether it's R3,000, R300,000 or R31 million. Leadership starts with respecting public funds, not dismissing concerns about how they're spent. South Africans deserve transparency, accountability and leaders who understand that every rand matters 🇿🇦💸

🚨GAYTON McKENZIE MUST GO! 💰 If R31 million in public spending is "not a lot of money" because it's government money, then South Africans are entitled to ask an obvious question: Why does the same government prosecute people accused of stealing thousands or millions of rand? Public money isn't "nobody's money"—it's taxpayers' money. Every rand should be treated with accountability, whether it's R3,000, R300,000 or R31 million. Leadership starts with respecting public funds, not dismissing concerns about how they're spent. South Africans deserve transparency, accountability and leaders who understand that every rand matters 🇿🇦💸

In A Nutshell🥜

90,209 views • 1 month ago

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsht “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the fk 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely fking closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sht up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,084 views • 4 months ago

🚨 NOW: King Charles has a PRESIDENTIAL-level motorcade rolling through DC right now We now have an ACTUAL king on our soil, but there are NO SIGNS of any "No Kings" protests anywhere in the nation right now. Interesting how that works!

🚨 NOW: King Charles has a PRESIDENTIAL-level motorcade rolling through DC right now We now have an ACTUAL king on our soil, but there are NO SIGNS of any "No Kings" protests anywhere in the nation right now. Interesting how that works!

Nick Sortor

6,032,624 views • 4 months ago

'We paid taxpayers' money to a top barrister for months. All of that is completely invisible; no-one outside the system has any concept that these things happen.' Dominic Cummings explains how Whitehall's 'invisible' war on government reform effectively strips ministers of their power. Dominic Cummings Michael Gove Madeline Grant

'We paid taxpayers' money to a top barrister for months. All of that is completely invisible; no-one outside the system has any concept that these things happen.' Dominic Cummings explains how Whitehall's 'invisible' war on government reform effectively strips ministers of their power. Dominic Cummings Michael Gove Madeline Grant

The Spectator

47,171 views • 8 months ago

Here it is: NGOs: the most profitable organizations operating under the direct supervision of Tim tampon Walz. Former Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann confirms that Democrats create inflated budgets so they can launder taxpayer money through grants to their friends’ NGOs. “Here’s the dirty secret that people don’t understand about Minnesota. Progressive lawmakers have been inflating Minnesota’s budget so they can create grants to fund nonprofits that ultimately are for their friends, their supporters, and their constituent groups. So our state budget is a pass-through entity. It’s a financial funnel that goes from federal money, state money, to local money, but it goes through nonprofits. So friends of the progressives in Minnesota, who for decades have run this state, create a nonprofit, register it with the Minnesota Secretary of State, and then all of a sudden they can receive funding. A lot of these jobs are no-work jobs. So we are now not just dealing with fraud, but with an intentional scam that has been going on for decades and decades in Minnesota.” In other words: Exactly what the U.S. Congress does.

Here it is: NGOs: the most profitable organizations operating under the direct supervision of Tim tampon Walz. Former Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann confirms that Democrats create inflated budgets so they can launder taxpayer money through grants to their friends’ NGOs. “Here’s the dirty secret that people don’t understand about Minnesota. Progressive lawmakers have been inflating Minnesota’s budget so they can create grants to fund nonprofits that ultimately are for their friends, their supporters, and their constituent groups. So our state budget is a pass-through entity. It’s a financial funnel that goes from federal money, state money, to local money, but it goes through nonprofits. So friends of the progressives in Minnesota, who for decades have run this state, create a nonprofit, register it with the Minnesota Secretary of State, and then all of a sudden they can receive funding. A lot of these jobs are no-work jobs. So we are now not just dealing with fraud, but with an intentional scam that has been going on for decades and decades in Minnesota.” In other words: Exactly what the U.S. Congress does.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

21,290 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "Why are we giving $21 million to India? They have a lot more money. They are one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us; we can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India and their Prime Minister, but giving $21 million for voter turnout?..." Source: The White House/ YouTube

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "Why are we giving $21 million to India? They have a lot more money. They are one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us; we can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India and their Prime Minister, but giving $21 million for voter turnout?..." Source: The White House/ YouTube

ANI

917,641 views • 1 year ago

California Governor candidate Chad Bianco explains nonprofits are being by developers to get rid of buildings they can’t sell Just one example - Developers have properties nobody will buy for $3 million - A nonprofit is given $10 million to spend on homelessness - The nonprofit is friends with the developer and buys the property for $6 million So the homeless nonprofit has $4 million on taxpayer money they got for free and no owns a building they can sell for millions That developer friend made $6 million on a property that was essentially worthless because no one would buy it Both are rich and taxpayers paid for it al. It’s one big taxpayer money laundering scheme Chad Bianco says this is what’s happening on repeat in California He says they go even further and give their family members $500,000 per year jobs at the nonprofits

California Governor candidate Chad Bianco explains nonprofits are being by developers to get rid of buildings they can’t sell Just one example - Developers have properties nobody will buy for $3 million - A nonprofit is given $10 million to spend on homelessness - The nonprofit is friends with the developer and buys the property for $6 million So the homeless nonprofit has $4 million on taxpayer money they got for free and no owns a building they can sell for millions That developer friend made $6 million on a property that was essentially worthless because no one would buy it Both are rich and taxpayers paid for it al. It’s one big taxpayer money laundering scheme Chad Bianco says this is what’s happening on repeat in California He says they go even further and give their family members $500,000 per year jobs at the nonprofits

Wall Street Apes

223,713 views • 4 months ago

Larry Ellison: “When WhatsApp sold for $19B, a lot of us were shocked… until we thought about it” In 2014, Mark Zuckerberg bought WhatsApp and their 450 million MAUs for $19 billion. “A lot of us [in Silicon Valley] were shocked — until we thought about it and understood the value of having access to that many consumers,” Oracle founder Larry Ellison says in this interview that took place a few months after the acquisition closed. Ellison points out that you have to take into consideration how much traditional businesses (e.g. cable TV companies) pay to acquire customers: “This is not the place to debate how much you can get through WhatsApp — $1 per year per customer is not going to do it — but I believe there will be opportunity to sell these same customers other things as they join your ecosystem.” He continues: “There was quite a battle between Facebook and Google over that property. It wasn’t that one guy did something really silly with a lot of money. Mark Zuckerberg won an auction over Google and paid a high price but got a very valuable asset in the 21st century.” As of 2025, WhatsApp has approximately 3.1 billion MAUs globally.

Larry Ellison: “When WhatsApp sold for $19B, a lot of us were shocked… until we thought about it” In 2014, Mark Zuckerberg bought WhatsApp and their 450 million MAUs for $19 billion. “A lot of us [in Silicon Valley] were shocked — until we thought about it and understood the value of having access to that many consumers,” Oracle founder Larry Ellison says in this interview that took place a few months after the acquisition closed. Ellison points out that you have to take into consideration how much traditional businesses (e.g. cable TV companies) pay to acquire customers: “This is not the place to debate how much you can get through WhatsApp — $1 per year per customer is not going to do it — but I believe there will be opportunity to sell these same customers other things as they join your ecosystem.” He continues: “There was quite a battle between Facebook and Google over that property. It wasn’t that one guy did something really silly with a lot of money. Mark Zuckerberg won an auction over Google and paid a high price but got a very valuable asset in the 21st century.” As of 2025, WhatsApp has approximately 3.1 billion MAUs globally.

Startup Archive

600,475 views • 5 months ago

Hardeep Singh Puri on Rahul Gandhi's repeated lies and gaffes: "I'm not saying that it has no entertainment value. There is a lot of entertainment value. But on side we have leaders who are dedicated to transforming the country by working round the clock, and then we have elements of buffoonery."

Hardeep Singh Puri on Rahul Gandhi's repeated lies and gaffes: "I'm not saying that it has no entertainment value. There is a lot of entertainment value. But on side we have leaders who are dedicated to transforming the country by working round the clock, and then we have elements of buffoonery."

Rakesh Krishnan Simha

19,184 views • 5 months ago