Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Fear of being called racist is getting us killed. And we're called racist anyway. The inquiry into Axel Rudakubana’s crimes has revealed that his parents knew he was a danger and didn’t stop him. On the morning of the attack his mother discovered empty knife packaging, realised he'd left...

LeoKearse's profile picture

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

109,067 subscribers

40,812 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The demented idea that the countryside is racist is gaining traction in our woke institutions. But, make no mistake: this is not about racism The British people are being demoralised in a prolonged war of attrition that seeks to undermine Britain's culture, heritage & way of life The race zealots who say the countryside is racist or that British culture is racist don't care about ethnic minorities at all. They have a visceral hatred of Britain & the West and seek to undermine them at every opportunity Every day it seems, a different institution tells the British people that they are racist, their culture is racist, their history is racist, their national heroes are racist, and now even their countryside is racist. If ever you wanted proof that Britain is a post-revolutionary society whose institutions have been completely captured by ideological apparatchicks trying to transform the soul of the nation, this is it. Why are they attacking the countryside? Because English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish identities are intrinsically linked to the landscape. Ask an Englishman to conjure up an image of England, and thoughts immediately turn to the countryside – the gently rolling hills and patchwork fields of England’s green and pleasant land. The countryside epitomises both nation and love of nation. It's a deeply emotional – almost spiritual – connection. Denouncing the countryside as racist is to directly attack both nation and national identity. Whether it be the National Trust, the British Library or our universities, our captured institutions are feverishly creating a future where the British people no longer have any pride, trust or belief in the nation. That is the ultimate goal. Alas, when one looks at surveys of British youth and their attitudes to the nation, it's a plan that is succeeding.
2:37

The demented idea that the countryside is racist is gaining traction in our woke institutions. But, make no mistake: this is not about racism The British people are being demoralised in a prolonged war of attrition that seeks to undermine Britain's culture, heritage & way of life The race zealots who say the countryside is racist or that British culture is racist don't care about ethnic minorities at all. They have a visceral hatred of Britain & the West and seek to undermine them at every opportunity Every day it seems, a different institution tells the British people that they are racist, their culture is racist, their history is racist, their national heroes are racist, and now even their countryside is racist. If ever you wanted proof that Britain is a post-revolutionary society whose institutions have been completely captured by ideological apparatchicks trying to transform the soul of the nation, this is it. Why are they attacking the countryside? Because English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish identities are intrinsically linked to the landscape. Ask an Englishman to conjure up an image of England, and thoughts immediately turn to the countryside – the gently rolling hills and patchwork fields of England’s green and pleasant land. The countryside epitomises both nation and love of nation. It's a deeply emotional – almost spiritual – connection. Denouncing the countryside as racist is to directly attack both nation and national identity. Whether it be the National Trust, the British Library or our universities, our captured institutions are feverishly creating a future where the British people no longer have any pride, trust or belief in the nation. That is the ultimate goal. Alas, when one looks at surveys of British youth and their attitudes to the nation, it's a plan that is succeeding.

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

219,072 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant
1:12

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

X Freeze

31,865 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

British people are being killed because other people are afraid of being called racist. Valdo Calocane should have been sectioned (well he should've been in another country, but since he's here he should've been sectioned). But he was freed following an earlier violent incident because mental health workers were worried that detaining him would be racist. Also, he avoided being injected with long-lasting anti-psychotic medication because he did not like needles, and NHS staff having “felt a pressure to avoid restrictive practice because of his ethnicity”. This is where the public sector drive for "diversity" and "equity" has led us - they want each demographic to have equal outcomes. So they try and force these outcomes by treating people differently. In this case, they felt pressure not to section a black man because black men are overrepresented in mental health statistics. But if diversity is a strength, then diversity exists. And couldn't part of diversity mean that a certain demographic is over-represented in mental health statistics? Diversity doesn't mean that we're all exactly the same, does it?
7:32

British people are being killed because other people are afraid of being called racist. Valdo Calocane should have been sectioned (well he should've been in another country, but since he's here he should've been sectioned). But he was freed following an earlier violent incident because mental health workers were worried that detaining him would be racist. Also, he avoided being injected with long-lasting anti-psychotic medication because he did not like needles, and NHS staff having “felt a pressure to avoid restrictive practice because of his ethnicity”. This is where the public sector drive for "diversity" and "equity" has led us - they want each demographic to have equal outcomes. So they try and force these outcomes by treating people differently. In this case, they felt pressure not to section a black man because black men are overrepresented in mental health statistics. But if diversity is a strength, then diversity exists. And couldn't part of diversity mean that a certain demographic is over-represented in mental health statistics? Diversity doesn't mean that we're all exactly the same, does it?

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

18,933 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Elon Musk: DEI and Wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism; they're also anti-meritocratic. “If by wokeism, one means just like racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, which DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society, where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory. So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant. It can't be that the government is deciding what is or is not misinformation or disinformation, because then you get politics applying to those labels, and in fact, you simply get the suppression of freedom of speech.”
1:31

Elon Musk: DEI and Wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism; they're also anti-meritocratic. “If by wokeism, one means just like racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, which DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society, where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory. So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant. It can't be that the government is deciding what is or is not misinformation or disinformation, because then you get politics applying to those labels, and in fact, you simply get the suppression of freedom of speech.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

22,743 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

☝️🏾Michelle Obama is right! MAGA is NOT full of racist people; it's full of desperate people. And of course, who was the first to attack her? Black liberals. Why? Because racism feeds the black liberal. If Michelle Obama, the queen of black politics, says that it's not racism, how will the black liberal eat? Without racism, how will the black liberal gain the attention of blacks? How will they maintain their sense of purpose? The black liberal is simply an errand dog for white liberals. Without racism, the black liberal is of NO value to the white liberal and immediately becomes disposable. As you can see, they will even attack black women; Barack's wife is not exempt. Anyone can get it! But Michelle is right. These people aren't racist. They truly are desperate. Public schools and universities did not equip them with survival skills. It taught them how to be a slave (we'll talk about the white slaves of America at a later date). The schools didn't teach them how to think. The schools didn't make them more intelligent. In fact, it gave many whites a false sense of intelligence. School taught them that if you have knowledge, then you are intelligent. But that is only half of the puzzle. Knowledge is just mental masturbation...when you don't have the skill of problem-solving. And when you grow up spoon-fed, there aren't many problems to solve. So, what we have is a population of educated fools who think they are intelligent but are not. And many of them are realizing this now, and their ego is shattered. So, what do they do? They look for the low-hanging fruit. Racism. They know that rage bait can get them the attention that their minds can't. Because they have nothing positive to contribute to society, they must resort to the lowest of tactics to survive. That's why they don't anger me. All I see is a sea of pitiful dolts...like someone who is mentally challenged. There's no reason to have high expectations for the intellectually disabled. What we are witnessing from this group of whites is acts of desperation. Hope is almost gone in their minds. The America they learned to love was only a veneer to mask its dark side. If only they studied black history. They would see the evil that the government is capable of. But no, they were happy because the target was not them. They were happy not to be black. But now...white conservatives are the new niggas. How long will they remain suckled at the teat of Lady Liberty?
2:34

☝️🏾Michelle Obama is right! MAGA is NOT full of racist people; it's full of desperate people. And of course, who was the first to attack her? Black liberals. Why? Because racism feeds the black liberal. If Michelle Obama, the queen of black politics, says that it's not racism, how will the black liberal eat? Without racism, how will the black liberal gain the attention of blacks? How will they maintain their sense of purpose? The black liberal is simply an errand dog for white liberals. Without racism, the black liberal is of NO value to the white liberal and immediately becomes disposable. As you can see, they will even attack black women; Barack's wife is not exempt. Anyone can get it! But Michelle is right. These people aren't racist. They truly are desperate. Public schools and universities did not equip them with survival skills. It taught them how to be a slave (we'll talk about the white slaves of America at a later date). The schools didn't teach them how to think. The schools didn't make them more intelligent. In fact, it gave many whites a false sense of intelligence. School taught them that if you have knowledge, then you are intelligent. But that is only half of the puzzle. Knowledge is just mental masturbation...when you don't have the skill of problem-solving. And when you grow up spoon-fed, there aren't many problems to solve. So, what we have is a population of educated fools who think they are intelligent but are not. And many of them are realizing this now, and their ego is shattered. So, what do they do? They look for the low-hanging fruit. Racism. They know that rage bait can get them the attention that their minds can't. Because they have nothing positive to contribute to society, they must resort to the lowest of tactics to survive. That's why they don't anger me. All I see is a sea of pitiful dolts...like someone who is mentally challenged. There's no reason to have high expectations for the intellectually disabled. What we are witnessing from this group of whites is acts of desperation. Hope is almost gone in their minds. The America they learned to love was only a veneer to mask its dark side. If only they studied black history. They would see the evil that the government is capable of. But no, they were happy because the target was not them. They were happy not to be black. But now...white conservatives are the new niggas. How long will they remain suckled at the teat of Lady Liberty?

Hotep Jesus

13,644 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

ELON MUSK: You can't simultaneously say that there is systemic racist oppression but also that races don't exist, that race is a social construct > The media used to be racist against black people and sexist against women; now it is racist against white people and Asians, and sexist against men > They just want to change the target, but really they shouldn't be racist and sexist at all > Racism is racism in the absolute. There just needs to be consistency > If it's okay to have Black, Asian, or Indian Pride, it should be okay to have White Pride too > If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of all religions (provided they aren't oppressive) > The goal should be ensuring consistency to eliminate bias > If it is possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race > It's a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane and people go insane
2:17

ELON MUSK: You can't simultaneously say that there is systemic racist oppression but also that races don't exist, that race is a social construct > The media used to be racist against black people and sexist against women; now it is racist against white people and Asians, and sexist against men > They just want to change the target, but really they shouldn't be racist and sexist at all > Racism is racism in the absolute. There just needs to be consistency > If it's okay to have Black, Asian, or Indian Pride, it should be okay to have White Pride too > If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of all religions (provided they aren't oppressive) > The goal should be ensuring consistency to eliminate bias > If it is possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race > It's a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane and people go insane

X Freeze

66,719 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This is one of the most insidious and destructive tenets of critical race theory—the teaching that if you, as a white person, have ANY type of reaction to CRT dogma, other than full-throated acceptance, that is yet further PROOF of your racism. If you say “I’m not racist,” it’s proof of racism. If you get upset or defensive, it’s proof of racism. If you push back in any way or—God forbid—shun the Church of CRT, it’s proof of racism. It goes without saying, but ideology like that 👆leaves no room for free speech, no room for discourse, no room for finding a workable solution that incorporates all Americans, no room for experiences or voices of anyone who’s not black. It ONLY serves to divide us further, because it deals with perceived racism by inflicting…additional racism. But of course, that’s precisely the point: As Kendi states in his trash HOW TO BE AN ANTI-RACIST, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” Anyone with a brain and a soul can see that 👆is a recipe for CONTINUOUS and NEVER-ENDING discrimination. But my guess is that’s precisely the point.
2:53

This is one of the most insidious and destructive tenets of critical race theory—the teaching that if you, as a white person, have ANY type of reaction to CRT dogma, other than full-throated acceptance, that is yet further PROOF of your racism. If you say “I’m not racist,” it’s proof of racism. If you get upset or defensive, it’s proof of racism. If you push back in any way or—God forbid—shun the Church of CRT, it’s proof of racism. It goes without saying, but ideology like that 👆leaves no room for free speech, no room for discourse, no room for finding a workable solution that incorporates all Americans, no room for experiences or voices of anyone who’s not black. It ONLY serves to divide us further, because it deals with perceived racism by inflicting…additional racism. But of course, that’s precisely the point: As Kendi states in his trash HOW TO BE AN ANTI-RACIST, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” Anyone with a brain and a soul can see that 👆is a recipe for CONTINUOUS and NEVER-ENDING discrimination. But my guess is that’s precisely the point.

Natalie Jean Beisner

491,090 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Paul Schrader talks about the racism in "Taxi Driver" (1976, Scorsese): "Interviewer: In 'Taxi Driver' (1976), was the Harvey Keitel character originally black or white? Schrader: Well, you’ve gone right to the heart of the matter. The film is riddled with racism, and Travis, the main character, is a racist not by conviction but by fear. He is everything by fear. He has very few convictions about anything except immorality, but when you feel the pressure coming down, when you feel the world shrinking, one naturally looks for enemies, and what better enemies are there than people who are not like you? Travis’ enemies are people who are at ease. He hates people who are comfortable. He himself is extremely uncomfortable. He’s not at ease anywhere, so he hates. Travis admires the politician but also hates him because the politician is at ease, especially in the world of women. This is where Travis’ feelings about blacks emerge. He sees the blacks out there almost as animals. He sees them out there having fun, out there jiving with women. He sees them dancing and relaxed. He’s so uptight himself and so constipated and attenuated that for him the blacks begin to be some kind of a focus for the thing he can’t have, that relaxation he lacks. So the racism starts to run through the film. It starts to rear its head very overtly. You see him looking at these people and you know it’s not a matter of conviction, because he doesn’t have any real beliefs or strong theories about blacks. It’s just that he has this thing about people who are at ease. The logical conclusion of the film would have been that all the people he ki!!ed were black. It was in my mind when I wrote the script that he ki!!ed only black people, but that was just too much. Marty and I were just too terrified of it. I mean, the film explores the borders of bad taste as it is, and there is just so far you can go in the commercial cinema before people get up and throw stones at you. I think that if we had followed his racism to the natural conclusion, which is him ki!!ing three black guys, the audience would have just said, “Holy f**k, that’s just too much.” So we made them white, which is a thin cover. Somebody asked Pauline Kael if the film was racist, and she said, “No, it’s not racist, because he doesn’t ki!! black guys at the end.” She missed the point completely. His actions are racist, and the only reason he doesn’t ki!! black guys at the end is that we didn’t want anybody st@bbed in the theaters. That’s my opinion. Marty may dress it up and put it in a different language, but the racism of the film really is quite clear. I think it’s possible to distinguish between the racism of the main character and the racism of the filmmakers. I mean, Marty and I and De Niro are racists to the extent that all people are racists. I think it’s part of the job of a writer or anybody worth his salt to explore his closets. We’re all in the dirty-laundry business. An artist gets to a certain point where he says, “I’m not afraid to explore my Jewishness,” “I’m not afraid to explore my homicidal tendencies,” “I’m not afraid to explore my s**ual deviations,” “I’m not afraid to explore my racism." I mean, the whole f***!ng film takes place in his head. New York consists of a lot more than Forty-second Street and Broadway. All you see of New York is his very peculiar vision of it, and he has a very sordid view of things. You only see blacks through his eyes, and the only exception is the black he works with, who he borrows money from. You are given no alternative view of reality. One of the rare things about Taxi Driver is that this character, Travis Bickle, has been in a lot of movies, but you’ve always been given another perspective on him. In 'In Cold Blood' (1967) you see him through John Forsythe’s eyes. In 'Psycho' (1960) you see him through Martin Balsam’s eyes. In 'White Heat' (1949) you see him through Edmond O’Brien’s eyes. But this is as though you see White Heat solely through Cagney’s eyes, which makes for something very different, because Cagney is very mentally disturbed in that film. You have the same situation here. You’re getting Travis’ perceptions of the world, which are very distorted and unrealistic." (Paul Schrader's interview with AFI, 1976)
0:59

Paul Schrader talks about the racism in "Taxi Driver" (1976, Scorsese): "Interviewer: In 'Taxi Driver' (1976), was the Harvey Keitel character originally black or white? Schrader: Well, you’ve gone right to the heart of the matter. The film is riddled with racism, and Travis, the main character, is a racist not by conviction but by fear. He is everything by fear. He has very few convictions about anything except immorality, but when you feel the pressure coming down, when you feel the world shrinking, one naturally looks for enemies, and what better enemies are there than people who are not like you? Travis’ enemies are people who are at ease. He hates people who are comfortable. He himself is extremely uncomfortable. He’s not at ease anywhere, so he hates. Travis admires the politician but also hates him because the politician is at ease, especially in the world of women. This is where Travis’ feelings about blacks emerge. He sees the blacks out there almost as animals. He sees them out there having fun, out there jiving with women. He sees them dancing and relaxed. He’s so uptight himself and so constipated and attenuated that for him the blacks begin to be some kind of a focus for the thing he can’t have, that relaxation he lacks. So the racism starts to run through the film. It starts to rear its head very overtly. You see him looking at these people and you know it’s not a matter of conviction, because he doesn’t have any real beliefs or strong theories about blacks. It’s just that he has this thing about people who are at ease. The logical conclusion of the film would have been that all the people he ki!!ed were black. It was in my mind when I wrote the script that he ki!!ed only black people, but that was just too much. Marty and I were just too terrified of it. I mean, the film explores the borders of bad taste as it is, and there is just so far you can go in the commercial cinema before people get up and throw stones at you. I think that if we had followed his racism to the natural conclusion, which is him ki!!ing three black guys, the audience would have just said, “Holy f**k, that’s just too much.” So we made them white, which is a thin cover. Somebody asked Pauline Kael if the film was racist, and she said, “No, it’s not racist, because he doesn’t ki!! black guys at the end.” She missed the point completely. His actions are racist, and the only reason he doesn’t ki!! black guys at the end is that we didn’t want anybody st@bbed in the theaters. That’s my opinion. Marty may dress it up and put it in a different language, but the racism of the film really is quite clear. I think it’s possible to distinguish between the racism of the main character and the racism of the filmmakers. I mean, Marty and I and De Niro are racists to the extent that all people are racists. I think it’s part of the job of a writer or anybody worth his salt to explore his closets. We’re all in the dirty-laundry business. An artist gets to a certain point where he says, “I’m not afraid to explore my Jewishness,” “I’m not afraid to explore my homicidal tendencies,” “I’m not afraid to explore my s**ual deviations,” “I’m not afraid to explore my racism." I mean, the whole f***!ng film takes place in his head. New York consists of a lot more than Forty-second Street and Broadway. All you see of New York is his very peculiar vision of it, and he has a very sordid view of things. You only see blacks through his eyes, and the only exception is the black he works with, who he borrows money from. You are given no alternative view of reality. One of the rare things about Taxi Driver is that this character, Travis Bickle, has been in a lot of movies, but you’ve always been given another perspective on him. In 'In Cold Blood' (1967) you see him through John Forsythe’s eyes. In 'Psycho' (1960) you see him through Martin Balsam’s eyes. In 'White Heat' (1949) you see him through Edmond O’Brien’s eyes. But this is as though you see White Heat solely through Cagney’s eyes, which makes for something very different, because Cagney is very mentally disturbed in that film. You have the same situation here. You’re getting Travis’ perceptions of the world, which are very distorted and unrealistic." (Paul Schrader's interview with AFI, 1976)

DepressedBergman

102,144 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Zack Polanski, "Why do we hear this phrase all the time, unconscious bias?" Professor Keon West, "It's incredibly comfortable" "In the UK it's so hard to have a conversation about racism or sexism" "You won't hear people say: I did that and that was a racist thing to do" "You can go on TV and say you hate seeing a bunch of black and brown faces - like Reform UK's Sarah Pochin - and say you cannot be racist, it must be a misunderstanding" "Similarly men will say all sorts of things but not say that was sexist" "I think that is considered so impolite and so hurtful, to own up to that bias, that we sneak in a word in front of that, 'unconscious', and suddenly we don't have to feel quite so bad" "And everybody has it" "That focus that makes us calmer about the bias, that's really for the benefit of the people feeling bias" "It's not at all for the benefit of the people on the receiving end of the bias"
1:08

Zack Polanski, "Why do we hear this phrase all the time, unconscious bias?" Professor Keon West, "It's incredibly comfortable" "In the UK it's so hard to have a conversation about racism or sexism" "You won't hear people say: I did that and that was a racist thing to do" "You can go on TV and say you hate seeing a bunch of black and brown faces - like Reform UK's Sarah Pochin - and say you cannot be racist, it must be a misunderstanding" "Similarly men will say all sorts of things but not say that was sexist" "I think that is considered so impolite and so hurtful, to own up to that bias, that we sneak in a word in front of that, 'unconscious', and suddenly we don't have to feel quite so bad" "And everybody has it" "That focus that makes us calmer about the bias, that's really for the benefit of the people feeling bias" "It's not at all for the benefit of the people on the receiving end of the bias"

Farrukh

70,597 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This video is propaganda. It functioned to keep Sargon in beer money, and the population of the UK in denial about race. Like all good lies, it contains elements of truth, of which Sargon supplies massive helpings - far more than most propagandists ever dare - but it's effective... The first two minutes and 32 seconds are all true, by which time your brain trusts him, and you see him as being on your side as a White native Englishman. Of course right from the start he picks the easiest of targets (put a box of cornflakes next to a Guardian journalist and it will look like a patriot). And then (at 2:33) you get: "...but luckily for everyone else, being English is not just about being a race...". He continues: "...it's a particular way of viewing the world much as anything else", "...saying that I as an individual matter; every human matters". Of course Carl is not in any way wrong to identify and celebrate various English cultural artefacts as English, nor is he wrong to identify them as cultural, but the trick being done is to cut away their moorings from the DNA of the people who created them. You don't see him doing it, but he's in the water, scuba-diving down with a knife between his teeth, towards the tethers... ...And sure enough, at 5:19, in a mocking sneering smug tone: "But anyway Maya, let's get back to 'racial politics'. Let's not talk about values or ideas or ideals, or things that actually make the world a better place: let's get back to your fucking racial politics" (building to an angry exasperated tone). And suddenly there we are. 😐 The culture in which we were all being encouraged to take pride and admire now floats entirely free of its genetic substrate. Racial politics is bad, and associated in your brain with Guardian journalists. This - our - culture which the bodies and brains of our ancestors built, is now some sort of magic pink sparkly cloud hovering just above the ground, into which Indians and Africans can walk serenely and thereby be sort of transformed into us, nearly, just so long as it's done at a slow responsible pace. At 5:54 Sargon continues his imaginary conversation with Maya of The Guardian, adopting a super-confident and mildly exasperated lecturing tone (his favourite mode of address, obviously), and says: "But Maya, immigrants are not just a race; there are many hundreds of thousands of immigrants from France, and if you go to London, to an area which is predominantly populated by French people, it would not be sensible to say 'well this is an English area of London', is it, and yet that's nothing to do with their race, because they, like you will obviously point out, are White...". Well hang on Carl, yes, they are all White, and so maybe the thing making it (as you say) "not-sensible" to say they should not be in London doesn't become non-racial. Looks like you just talked yourself there in an illogical way. They are all White. Maybe this matters. Perhaps if we instead consider the prospect of adding the same number (many hundreds of thousands) of subsaharan Africans to London rather than Frenchmen, now it would be very sensible indeed to say they should not be there, whence the sensible - racial - criterion is plain to see. A full essay on the evolution of human nature in geographically isolated regions and the neurodiversity which emerged from that is beyond the scope of this tweet, but suffice to say White culture is what you get from White people, and African culture is what you get from African people. Europeans are White, and the relative closeness among European countries and cultures (compared to subsaharan Africans) by most metrics you might care about is not a coincidence, since heritable biological traits actually exist and actually matter, and they are not distributed evenly between different racial groups (see Fst distance), ergo race matters. Carl is a master of tugging at heartstrings, talking about these "past generations of blacks" who "admired English culture", and "wanted to be like us" etc.. Yes, no doubt many such individuals existed. They were always exceptional though, and we know they were exceptional, because if they weren't then Africa today would basically be similar to Yorkshire, just with nicer weather. And the problem for Carl is that Africa is obviously not like that, nor does any population of blacks anywhere in the world behave as a group like Europeans. I don't care particularly about John Cleese or what he says or where he goes, so the rest of the video is not terribly interesting, but just note at 6:48 Carl talks in approving terms of how "a small number of immigrants is OK", but "an overwhelming flood is pushing that principle too far". The problem with that is the number of non-Whites already in Britain was crazy-high in 2019 when Carl made this video, and our children were already well on track to becoming minorities in British schools without adding a single immigrant, even back then. Horrible racial conflict has been rife across the capital at least since the 90s, and it would be delusional to see the 1981 Brixton riots as anything but racial, ...and all this, and every sort of demographic vandalism besides, has come to pass PURELY because people who had advocated for racial politics in the 60s and 70s were successfully demonised by the media, just as Carl is doing in this video. The obvious foolishness of large numbers is like the obvious danger of lots of gunpowder compared to a small amount of gunpowder. It's not like the conflict magically goes away when the numbers are small. You just get White people lying to themselves and pushing discomfort down into their subconsciousness, and non-Whites sometimes (but by no means always) playing the game at first till their numbers become large enough. Pakistanis understood that cultural attitudes to child rape were different in our country, and so they assimilated by successfully hiding their child rape for about 20 or 30 years. Some White people even helped with that assimilation. The parts of our culture that Carl claims to want to promote (rule of law, freedom to criticise Islam, mutual respect, etc) is stuff that exists DESPITE the non-White population in the UK. It IS racial. And like of course it's racial. We are our DNA. Our culture was made by people, ...who were made by DNA. You can not make White people feel good - proudly talking up White culture - and then in the next breath sneer down your nose at those engaging in racial politics. It's a nasty (and given that Carl is not stupid, I have to suspect cynical) trick, the effect of which is to encourage a White audience to continue entertaining a suicidal and delusional belief in a tabula rasa model of human nature. His defenders will say "oh this is an old video, he's changed now...", and I am sure he is delighted that you believe so. Show me any example of him back-tracking on a single word of that though. I'll wait. I am writing this because I see what's happening to our population, and frankly anyone who isn't willing to recognise the need for racial politics is not your friend in this battle. If Carl has changed, then now would be a really great time to make that clear and come out on the side of Racial Nationalism. Anything else is just muddying the waters and enabling the stigmatisation of actual patriots. Look at where the UK is, and where it is going. Look at the pictures of schools with literally a single White face sitting among a sea of blacks. It's fucking insane, and it's obviously a racial issue that requires racial politics. At least we're talking about a rational lawful non-violent approach to sorting out who should be allowed to claim Englishness. We're having a conversation. Steve Laws, for example, is not a terrorist: he is a brave patriot giving a voice to the native population of a land which wants to recover that land. In reality English people are basically lovely. We're softies. The rest of the world knows that though. If we start to get a serious program of remigration off the ground, yes the reduction in sheer numbers of racial aliens will be welcome in itself, but black families that didn't produce criminal rugrats, and haven't spent the past 40 years moaning about how racist the English are will probably find that White communities rally round them, put in a good word for them, and achieve a consensus about not deporting them. What needs to happen is a basic shift in the narrative, and in the psychology: the assumption and understanding should be that citizenship is genetic, and that any exception to that is a polite and kind gesture from our people, which we have the full moral and legal right to withhold if we feel that we're being treated as suckers. And that's what I have to say about that. ...And of course Happy New Year to everyone in Australia!!! 🥳🎉🪩 -A.Frog '25/'26 🐸👍🏻
20:47

This video is propaganda. It functioned to keep Sargon in beer money, and the population of the UK in denial about race. Like all good lies, it contains elements of truth, of which Sargon supplies massive helpings - far more than most propagandists ever dare - but it's effective... The first two minutes and 32 seconds are all true, by which time your brain trusts him, and you see him as being on your side as a White native Englishman. Of course right from the start he picks the easiest of targets (put a box of cornflakes next to a Guardian journalist and it will look like a patriot). And then (at 2:33) you get: "...but luckily for everyone else, being English is not just about being a race...". He continues: "...it's a particular way of viewing the world much as anything else", "...saying that I as an individual matter; every human matters". Of course Carl is not in any way wrong to identify and celebrate various English cultural artefacts as English, nor is he wrong to identify them as cultural, but the trick being done is to cut away their moorings from the DNA of the people who created them. You don't see him doing it, but he's in the water, scuba-diving down with a knife between his teeth, towards the tethers... ...And sure enough, at 5:19, in a mocking sneering smug tone: "But anyway Maya, let's get back to 'racial politics'. Let's not talk about values or ideas or ideals, or things that actually make the world a better place: let's get back to your fucking racial politics" (building to an angry exasperated tone). And suddenly there we are. 😐 The culture in which we were all being encouraged to take pride and admire now floats entirely free of its genetic substrate. Racial politics is bad, and associated in your brain with Guardian journalists. This - our - culture which the bodies and brains of our ancestors built, is now some sort of magic pink sparkly cloud hovering just above the ground, into which Indians and Africans can walk serenely and thereby be sort of transformed into us, nearly, just so long as it's done at a slow responsible pace. At 5:54 Sargon continues his imaginary conversation with Maya of The Guardian, adopting a super-confident and mildly exasperated lecturing tone (his favourite mode of address, obviously), and says: "But Maya, immigrants are not just a race; there are many hundreds of thousands of immigrants from France, and if you go to London, to an area which is predominantly populated by French people, it would not be sensible to say 'well this is an English area of London', is it, and yet that's nothing to do with their race, because they, like you will obviously point out, are White...". Well hang on Carl, yes, they are all White, and so maybe the thing making it (as you say) "not-sensible" to say they should not be in London doesn't become non-racial. Looks like you just talked yourself there in an illogical way. They are all White. Maybe this matters. Perhaps if we instead consider the prospect of adding the same number (many hundreds of thousands) of subsaharan Africans to London rather than Frenchmen, now it would be very sensible indeed to say they should not be there, whence the sensible - racial - criterion is plain to see. A full essay on the evolution of human nature in geographically isolated regions and the neurodiversity which emerged from that is beyond the scope of this tweet, but suffice to say White culture is what you get from White people, and African culture is what you get from African people. Europeans are White, and the relative closeness among European countries and cultures (compared to subsaharan Africans) by most metrics you might care about is not a coincidence, since heritable biological traits actually exist and actually matter, and they are not distributed evenly between different racial groups (see Fst distance), ergo race matters. Carl is a master of tugging at heartstrings, talking about these "past generations of blacks" who "admired English culture", and "wanted to be like us" etc.. Yes, no doubt many such individuals existed. They were always exceptional though, and we know they were exceptional, because if they weren't then Africa today would basically be similar to Yorkshire, just with nicer weather. And the problem for Carl is that Africa is obviously not like that, nor does any population of blacks anywhere in the world behave as a group like Europeans. I don't care particularly about John Cleese or what he says or where he goes, so the rest of the video is not terribly interesting, but just note at 6:48 Carl talks in approving terms of how "a small number of immigrants is OK", but "an overwhelming flood is pushing that principle too far". The problem with that is the number of non-Whites already in Britain was crazy-high in 2019 when Carl made this video, and our children were already well on track to becoming minorities in British schools without adding a single immigrant, even back then. Horrible racial conflict has been rife across the capital at least since the 90s, and it would be delusional to see the 1981 Brixton riots as anything but racial, ...and all this, and every sort of demographic vandalism besides, has come to pass PURELY because people who had advocated for racial politics in the 60s and 70s were successfully demonised by the media, just as Carl is doing in this video. The obvious foolishness of large numbers is like the obvious danger of lots of gunpowder compared to a small amount of gunpowder. It's not like the conflict magically goes away when the numbers are small. You just get White people lying to themselves and pushing discomfort down into their subconsciousness, and non-Whites sometimes (but by no means always) playing the game at first till their numbers become large enough. Pakistanis understood that cultural attitudes to child rape were different in our country, and so they assimilated by successfully hiding their child rape for about 20 or 30 years. Some White people even helped with that assimilation. The parts of our culture that Carl claims to want to promote (rule of law, freedom to criticise Islam, mutual respect, etc) is stuff that exists DESPITE the non-White population in the UK. It IS racial. And like of course it's racial. We are our DNA. Our culture was made by people, ...who were made by DNA. You can not make White people feel good - proudly talking up White culture - and then in the next breath sneer down your nose at those engaging in racial politics. It's a nasty (and given that Carl is not stupid, I have to suspect cynical) trick, the effect of which is to encourage a White audience to continue entertaining a suicidal and delusional belief in a tabula rasa model of human nature. His defenders will say "oh this is an old video, he's changed now...", and I am sure he is delighted that you believe so. Show me any example of him back-tracking on a single word of that though. I'll wait. I am writing this because I see what's happening to our population, and frankly anyone who isn't willing to recognise the need for racial politics is not your friend in this battle. If Carl has changed, then now would be a really great time to make that clear and come out on the side of Racial Nationalism. Anything else is just muddying the waters and enabling the stigmatisation of actual patriots. Look at where the UK is, and where it is going. Look at the pictures of schools with literally a single White face sitting among a sea of blacks. It's fucking insane, and it's obviously a racial issue that requires racial politics. At least we're talking about a rational lawful non-violent approach to sorting out who should be allowed to claim Englishness. We're having a conversation. Steve Laws, for example, is not a terrorist: he is a brave patriot giving a voice to the native population of a land which wants to recover that land. In reality English people are basically lovely. We're softies. The rest of the world knows that though. If we start to get a serious program of remigration off the ground, yes the reduction in sheer numbers of racial aliens will be welcome in itself, but black families that didn't produce criminal rugrats, and haven't spent the past 40 years moaning about how racist the English are will probably find that White communities rally round them, put in a good word for them, and achieve a consensus about not deporting them. What needs to happen is a basic shift in the narrative, and in the psychology: the assumption and understanding should be that citizenship is genetic, and that any exception to that is a polite and kind gesture from our people, which we have the full moral and legal right to withhold if we feel that we're being treated as suckers. And that's what I have to say about that. ...And of course Happy New Year to everyone in Australia!!! 🥳🎉🪩 -A.Frog '25/'26 🐸👍🏻

𝙰𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝙵𝚛𝚘𝚐

167,032 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

In October 2024, the Free Speech Union came to the aid of Rick Prior, the elected Chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation, after he was suspended for saying that rank-and-file officers had become so fearful of complaints of racism — and potentially losing their jobs — that they no longer dared challenge allegations of racism, particularly when made by people of colour. According to Prior, some officers were reluctant to intervene when they suspected a crime was being committed if the perpetrator was a black or brown person for fear of being accused of racism. Fortunately, with our support, Rick Prior won his Given the circumstance of Henry Nowak's death, it's clear that Rick Prior was right to raise these concerns. The police have overcorrected in response to the perception that the force is institutionally racist, and that needs to be addressed. People like Rick Prior — and other elected federation chairs — must be free to speak out about what they believe has gone wrong and propose common-sense solutions without risking suspension or dismissal. The lack of free speech within policing on these issues has contributed to the current state of affairs in which officers appear to be more concerned about not following up accusations of racism than protecting people from violent criminals. Watch the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary, Lord Young, below 👇
2:03

In October 2024, the Free Speech Union came to the aid of Rick Prior, the elected Chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation, after he was suspended for saying that rank-and-file officers had become so fearful of complaints of racism — and potentially losing their jobs — that they no longer dared challenge allegations of racism, particularly when made by people of colour. According to Prior, some officers were reluctant to intervene when they suspected a crime was being committed if the perpetrator was a black or brown person for fear of being accused of racism. Fortunately, with our support, Rick Prior won his Given the circumstance of Henry Nowak's death, it's clear that Rick Prior was right to raise these concerns. The police have overcorrected in response to the perception that the force is institutionally racist, and that needs to be addressed. People like Rick Prior — and other elected federation chairs — must be free to speak out about what they believe has gone wrong and propose common-sense solutions without risking suspension or dismissal. The lack of free speech within policing on these issues has contributed to the current state of affairs in which officers appear to be more concerned about not following up accusations of racism than protecting people from violent criminals. Watch the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary, Lord Young, below 👇

The Free Speech Union

75,464 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“You are enforcing Political policing. Its not your fault. You’re just following orders. But it’s interesting. Because in a very real sense it is the death of free speech in Britain” A conversation between Ranjeet Brar and Metropolitan Police at the March for Palestine. The conversation was the prelude to the arrest of 4 members of our organisation, on a charge of “aggravated racism” and “inciting racial hatred”. How can a history book documenting the rise of Zionism be labelled “racist hate” - even though it is an exposition and denunciation of racism? This is not clear. Judge for yourself. In view of the moves to criminalise this important work, we are making the text available as a pdf. Download and share widely. You can still order physical copies from our shop as well.
8:36

“You are enforcing Political policing. Its not your fault. You’re just following orders. But it’s interesting. Because in a very real sense it is the death of free speech in Britain” A conversation between Ranjeet Brar and Metropolitan Police at the March for Palestine. The conversation was the prelude to the arrest of 4 members of our organisation, on a charge of “aggravated racism” and “inciting racial hatred”. How can a history book documenting the rise of Zionism be labelled “racist hate” - even though it is an exposition and denunciation of racism? This is not clear. Judge for yourself. In view of the moves to criminalise this important work, we are making the text available as a pdf. Download and share widely. You can still order physical copies from our shop as well.

The Communists

72,697 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.
1:27

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

First of all, Megyn - Ben Shapiro did not mention Israel or Netanyahu once in his AmFest speech, so no, it’s not true that his problem with you is about Israel or Netanyahu. Why are you revising history and gaslighting us? Second, hatred of Jews is not caused by people calling out antisemitism. It is caused by lies. When you lie about a group of people constantly in an effort to convince the world that this group is inherently evil and demonic, or they’re secretly controlling the world to “subvert the Gentiles,” some people will become convinced it’s true. They will then begin hating that group of people. Was it white people’s fault that anti-white racism became mainstreamed and popular? Was anti-white racism made worse when Americans finally started calling it out for what it was and saying “No; we’re not doing this?” Of course not. The opposite happened and racist policies were rolled back. Racist rhetoric became unpopular again. Pushing back on evil and lies with the truth is the only way to fight racism of any kind. So do you really want Jew hate to stop? Stop praising and platforming liars. Stop lying about Jews, saying they control the media and the country. Stop lying about Ben Shapiro and address what he ACTUALLY said at AmFest. Until you start caring about the truth and defending it, YOU are complicit in the rise of Jew hate. Not Jews, Megyn. You.
1:53

First of all, Megyn - Ben Shapiro did not mention Israel or Netanyahu once in his AmFest speech, so no, it’s not true that his problem with you is about Israel or Netanyahu. Why are you revising history and gaslighting us? Second, hatred of Jews is not caused by people calling out antisemitism. It is caused by lies. When you lie about a group of people constantly in an effort to convince the world that this group is inherently evil and demonic, or they’re secretly controlling the world to “subvert the Gentiles,” some people will become convinced it’s true. They will then begin hating that group of people. Was it white people’s fault that anti-white racism became mainstreamed and popular? Was anti-white racism made worse when Americans finally started calling it out for what it was and saying “No; we’re not doing this?” Of course not. The opposite happened and racist policies were rolled back. Racist rhetoric became unpopular again. Pushing back on evil and lies with the truth is the only way to fight racism of any kind. So do you really want Jew hate to stop? Stop praising and platforming liars. Stop lying about Jews, saying they control the media and the country. Stop lying about Ben Shapiro and address what he ACTUALLY said at AmFest. Until you start caring about the truth and defending it, YOU are complicit in the rise of Jew hate. Not Jews, Megyn. You.

A 🌸

42,027 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨NEW HATE CRIME POLICIES ARE IN PLACE NOW I know I’ve spoken before about being arrested for “racism” against my own community, and I understand some people had doubts. I never blamed anyone for questioning it. But after taking legal advice, I can finally share this. Ladies and gentlemen, if you’ve ever doubted the reality of these new “Hate Crime Laws,” here’s the proof. Watch this video in full. Not only am I being threatened and harassed by members of the Muslim & Bengali community, but I’m also being targeted by the government. After Prevent Counter Terrorism police visited me and I was arrested, I was then visited again by another officer. The officer was polite but the outcome is the same: I’m now unable to get a job in Swansea. I’ve been labelled a “threat” and a “racist.” Organisations have been warned that if they hire me, pro Palestine marchers will show up to protest and demand I be sacked, just like they did when Swansea Council fired me. And this is only part of it. I have many more recordings of threatening calls which I’ll share in due course. This is the price I pay every day for simply saying: Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 is not a racist & the White people are not racist. This is just a glimpse of what I face almost every week.
3:58

🚨NEW HATE CRIME POLICIES ARE IN PLACE NOW I know I’ve spoken before about being arrested for “racism” against my own community, and I understand some people had doubts. I never blamed anyone for questioning it. But after taking legal advice, I can finally share this. Ladies and gentlemen, if you’ve ever doubted the reality of these new “Hate Crime Laws,” here’s the proof. Watch this video in full. Not only am I being threatened and harassed by members of the Muslim & Bengali community, but I’m also being targeted by the government. After Prevent Counter Terrorism police visited me and I was arrested, I was then visited again by another officer. The officer was polite but the outcome is the same: I’m now unable to get a job in Swansea. I’ve been labelled a “threat” and a “racist.” Organisations have been warned that if they hire me, pro Palestine marchers will show up to protest and demand I be sacked, just like they did when Swansea Council fired me. And this is only part of it. I have many more recordings of threatening calls which I’ll share in due course. This is the price I pay every day for simply saying: Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 is not a racist & the White people are not racist. This is just a glimpse of what I face almost every week.

Sir Shoaib

134,423 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NEW: Bill Maher leaves journalist stunned when he tells her the “End Racism” message in the NFL end zone does nothing to end racism. MAHER: “I noticed that at the Super Bowl, they’re, for the first time in, I think, four years now, the Trump administration is making them take away ‘End Racism,’ which they had written in the end zone.” TARA PALMERI: “But why? It just seems silly.” MAHER: “To do it or not to do it?” TARA PALMERI: “Why get rid of it?” MAHER: “Oh, I could tell you why. Because it was stupid to begin with. But let me ask you, who is it for? And if you’re a racist and you see ‘End Racism’ in the end zone, you’re gonna stop being a racist?” TARA PALMERI: (Stunned) “But the sentiment is basically like, don’t be an asshole.” MAHER: “But I think it’s an asshole to nag us during a football game about something that doesn’t change anything. If I’m not a racist and I see it, it doesn’t matter. And if I am a racist, it’s gonna make me more of a racist.” BYRON DONALDS: “Look, I think if you write ‘Don’t be an asshole’ in the end zone, everybody will agree with that.” (Round of Applause)
1:03

NEW: Bill Maher leaves journalist stunned when he tells her the “End Racism” message in the NFL end zone does nothing to end racism. MAHER: “I noticed that at the Super Bowl, they’re, for the first time in, I think, four years now, the Trump administration is making them take away ‘End Racism,’ which they had written in the end zone.” TARA PALMERI: “But why? It just seems silly.” MAHER: “To do it or not to do it?” TARA PALMERI: “Why get rid of it?” MAHER: “Oh, I could tell you why. Because it was stupid to begin with. But let me ask you, who is it for? And if you’re a racist and you see ‘End Racism’ in the end zone, you’re gonna stop being a racist?” TARA PALMERI: (Stunned) “But the sentiment is basically like, don’t be an asshole.” MAHER: “But I think it’s an asshole to nag us during a football game about something that doesn’t change anything. If I’m not a racist and I see it, it doesn’t matter. And if I am a racist, it’s gonna make me more of a racist.” BYRON DONALDS: “Look, I think if you write ‘Don’t be an asshole’ in the end zone, everybody will agree with that.” (Round of Applause)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,611,423 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Let’s kill this lie once and for all: Racism doesn’t come from working-class struggle. To claim the white working class would treat Black and Brown people better if they were economically happier is dishonest. It paints them as thoughtless, incapable of moral choice, and worse, it excuses their racism. Poverty doesn’t create racism; white supremacy does. And blaming hardship is just another way to protect it. If they truly cared about their economic struggle, they’d know what’s in Nigel Farage’s manifesto. They’d see that his policies are a direct assault on their own livelihoods. But they don’t care to know, because racism is the priority, not survival. In the age of the internet, ignorance is a choice. Information is at their fingertips, yet they choose hate over truth, division over solidarity. There are no excuses left. They’re complicit, and it’s time we stop pretending otherwise. White liberals in Britain, including Individuals like Gary Stevenson and others who see themselves as non-racists, or the ‘not all white people’ brigade end up gate keeping the deeply entrenched racism in the UK, this direct attack, this insult to the intelligence of Black and Brown people also shines a light on the extent of implicit racism permeated within Britain as a whole. This protects the very structures that uphold white supremacy. Their ‘white fragility’ exposes the truth: Britain’s racism isn’t confined to the far right. It’s polite, it’s intellectual, it’s middle-class. It hides behind reasoned tones and liberal credentials. And that’s why this country never has an honest conversation about racism, because white people of every class are terrified of what the mirror will show them. The truth is too ugly, and they’d rather rewrite it than face it.
2:13

Let’s kill this lie once and for all: Racism doesn’t come from working-class struggle. To claim the white working class would treat Black and Brown people better if they were economically happier is dishonest. It paints them as thoughtless, incapable of moral choice, and worse, it excuses their racism. Poverty doesn’t create racism; white supremacy does. And blaming hardship is just another way to protect it. If they truly cared about their economic struggle, they’d know what’s in Nigel Farage’s manifesto. They’d see that his policies are a direct assault on their own livelihoods. But they don’t care to know, because racism is the priority, not survival. In the age of the internet, ignorance is a choice. Information is at their fingertips, yet they choose hate over truth, division over solidarity. There are no excuses left. They’re complicit, and it’s time we stop pretending otherwise. White liberals in Britain, including Individuals like Gary Stevenson and others who see themselves as non-racists, or the ‘not all white people’ brigade end up gate keeping the deeply entrenched racism in the UK, this direct attack, this insult to the intelligence of Black and Brown people also shines a light on the extent of implicit racism permeated within Britain as a whole. This protects the very structures that uphold white supremacy. Their ‘white fragility’ exposes the truth: Britain’s racism isn’t confined to the far right. It’s polite, it’s intellectual, it’s middle-class. It hides behind reasoned tones and liberal credentials. And that’s why this country never has an honest conversation about racism, because white people of every class are terrified of what the mirror will show them. The truth is too ugly, and they’d rather rewrite it than face it.

Save Our Citizenships 🔻

12,075 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

If you want to know why Indians and Asians more broadly will continue to dominate in countries like Australia, you only need to watch these two fragile ethnonationalists lament their inability to outcompete the ambition and intellectual determination of Asian migrants. Their solution is to prefer immigration of people who would otherwise commit crimes because, according to them, they are of lower ambition and intellectual capacity so as not to challenge them. The overall "intellectual" conversation celebrates the ease with which they have been able to get moderate Australians to join them in being racist towards Indians, because, by far, according to them, it's the easiest target group for racism. Oh, and did I mention the overriding thesis is that it is being done to them by the Jews? As I keep saying, many Indians watching this type of content will completely overlook the racism (most of which was overt in other portions not shown here) and see it as confirmation of their dominance. I don't for a second believe these two daft individuals are representative of white Australia, but they are being amplified by people who don't understand the flaws in their thinking. All of this at a time when a serious discussion and rethinking of our immigration policies are required.
2:36

If you want to know why Indians and Asians more broadly will continue to dominate in countries like Australia, you only need to watch these two fragile ethnonationalists lament their inability to outcompete the ambition and intellectual determination of Asian migrants. Their solution is to prefer immigration of people who would otherwise commit crimes because, according to them, they are of lower ambition and intellectual capacity so as not to challenge them. The overall "intellectual" conversation celebrates the ease with which they have been able to get moderate Australians to join them in being racist towards Indians, because, by far, according to them, it's the easiest target group for racism. Oh, and did I mention the overriding thesis is that it is being done to them by the Jews? As I keep saying, many Indians watching this type of content will completely overlook the racism (most of which was overt in other portions not shown here) and see it as confirmation of their dominance. I don't for a second believe these two daft individuals are representative of white Australia, but they are being amplified by people who don't understand the flaws in their thinking. All of this at a time when a serious discussion and rethinking of our immigration policies are required.

Rukshan Fernando

262,955 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce