Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Fecal Waste from SIDCO Complex Lassipora Pulwama flushed into Rambiara river side. Request Deputy Commissioner Pulwama to take stern action against these people. Also request Central Pollution Control Board & JKPCC Chairman Mr Vasu Yadav to take notice of this Information & PR, J&K Divisional Commissioner Kashmir Waheed Ur...

rtimuzaffar's profile picture

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

11,081 subscribers

41,726 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Can we call this Development ? These are Parigam Newa Karewas in Pulwawa which was once known for its Saffron & Almond Cultivation. Request Dy CM & Mining Minister Surinder Choudhary to visit these areas Omar Abdullah District Mineral Officer Pulwama Deputy Commissioner Pulwama Waheed Ur Rehman Para Central Pollution Control Board
1:38

Can we call this Development ? These are Parigam Newa Karewas in Pulwawa which was once known for its Saffron & Almond Cultivation. Request Dy CM & Mining Minister Surinder Choudhary to visit these areas Omar Abdullah District Mineral Officer Pulwama Deputy Commissioner Pulwama Waheed Ur Rehman Para Central Pollution Control Board

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

19,752 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We need more Imams and Khateebs like Janab Syed Khurshid Andrabi sahib from Zadoora Pulwama. He keeps speaking about Waterbodies, Climate Change and Waste Management and uses Masjid as a forum to propagate his message Office of Chief Minister, J&K MoEF&CC Deputy Commissioner Pulwama MLA Pulwama Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Mehbooba Mufti Naeem Akhtar JK Climate Action Group Deputy Commissioner Budgam Athar Aamir Khan
3:30

We need more Imams and Khateebs like Janab Syed Khurshid Andrabi sahib from Zadoora Pulwama. He keeps speaking about Waterbodies, Climate Change and Waste Management and uses Masjid as a forum to propagate his message Office of Chief Minister, J&K MoEF&CC Deputy Commissioner Pulwama MLA Pulwama Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Mehbooba Mufti Naeem Akhtar JK Climate Action Group Deputy Commissioner Budgam Athar Aamir Khan

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

12,301 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Chinar Trees & Other Specified Trees are being Axed in large number in last few years- These trees could have been saved had J&K Govt enacted Tree Transplantation Act - It was heartwrenching to see a Chinar tree cut down in Ganapora Kralgund -Handwara yesterday- Today in Pulwama and Lalbazar Srinagar Chinar Trees were lopped massively- Will Govt act against the Officers or i will again have to move to NGT ? Omar Abdullah Office of Chief Minister, J&K Javed Dar Divisional Commissioner Kashmir Central Pollution Control Board MoEF&CC Deputy Commissioner Kupwara Deputy Commissioner Pulwama Information & PR, Srinagar MLA Pulwama Shiekh Khursheed
4:24

Chinar Trees & Other Specified Trees are being Axed in large number in last few years- These trees could have been saved had J&K Govt enacted Tree Transplantation Act - It was heartwrenching to see a Chinar tree cut down in Ganapora Kralgund -Handwara yesterday- Today in Pulwama and Lalbazar Srinagar Chinar Trees were lopped massively- Will Govt act against the Officers or i will again have to move to NGT ? Omar Abdullah Office of Chief Minister, J&K Javed Dar Divisional Commissioner Kashmir Central Pollution Control Board MoEF&CC Deputy Commissioner Kupwara Deputy Commissioner Pulwama Information & PR, Srinagar MLA Pulwama Shiekh Khursheed

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

12,896 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Can you believe Rs 48.88 Crores have been earned as Revenue by JKPSC & JKSSB alone in last few years from Unemployed Youth of J&K ? Info provided to MLA Pulwama by Govt Information & PR, J&K Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission JKSSB Official Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Waheed Ur Rehman Para Mehbooba Mufti Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Sajad Lone Mir Mujeeb Asif Rashid Hilal Hanjuri
3:47

Can you believe Rs 48.88 Crores have been earned as Revenue by JKPSC & JKSSB alone in last few years from Unemployed Youth of J&K ? Info provided to MLA Pulwama by Govt Information & PR, J&K Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission JKSSB Official Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Waheed Ur Rehman Para Mehbooba Mufti Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Sajad Lone Mir Mujeeb Asif Rashid Hilal Hanjuri

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

12,244 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I feel pity on the officers who allow such illegal structures to come up near Drinking Water sources & Streams . This is open violation of Water Act 1974 and MSW Rules 2016. Have updated Chairman Pollution Control Committee Mr Vasu Yadav. Request Deputy Commissioner Kulgam. to act Information & PR, J&K Office of Chief Minister, J&K
1:45

Sensitive content

I feel pity on the officers who allow such illegal structures to come up near Drinking Water sources & Streams . This is open violation of Water Act 1974 and MSW Rules 2016. Have updated Chairman Pollution Control Committee Mr Vasu Yadav. Request Deputy Commissioner Kulgam. to act Information & PR, J&K Office of Chief Minister, J&K

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

20,045 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Important video on the reservation issue. The issue is not sub judice and I’ve explained in this video why it is not. Please don’t mislead people by presenting it otherwise. I have also made a special request to all my legislators to seriously consider changing the existing EWS criteria. Please watch the video and share it widely. Salman Sagar Waheed Ur Rehman Para Sajad Lone Muntazir Mehdi Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Imran Nabi Dar J&K PDP JKNC Open Merit Students Association J&K Rising Kashmir Greater Kashmir
3:58

Important video on the reservation issue. The issue is not sub judice and I’ve explained in this video why it is not. Please don’t mislead people by presenting it otherwise. I have also made a special request to all my legislators to seriously consider changing the existing EWS criteria. Please watch the video and share it widely. Salman Sagar Waheed Ur Rehman Para Sajad Lone Muntazir Mehdi Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Imran Nabi Dar J&K PDP JKNC Open Merit Students Association J&K Rising Kashmir Greater Kashmir

Sahil Parray

11,336 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Massive LPG (Gas) Shortage in Chadoora. Here is my Ground Report. People seen in long queues for last two days. Authorities fail to ensure Home Delivery of Gas Cylinders. Request Deputy Commissioner Budgam to take action against the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited dealer. Full report is here Office of Chief Minister, J&K Satish Sharma Athar Aamir Khan Sajjad Shaheen Sajjad Shafi URI Sajjad Haider Tanvir Sadiq Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری
0:45

Massive LPG (Gas) Shortage in Chadoora. Here is my Ground Report. People seen in long queues for last two days. Authorities fail to ensure Home Delivery of Gas Cylinders. Request Deputy Commissioner Budgam to take action against the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited dealer. Full report is here Office of Chief Minister, J&K Satish Sharma Athar Aamir Khan Sajjad Shaheen Sajjad Shafi URI Sajjad Haider Tanvir Sadiq Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

10,476 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

People Living near Flood Zones of Kashmir must build Majuli Assam type Houses to prevent from Flooding suggests Prof Anunaya Chaubey Founder of Ongroud Design Foundation. Prof Chaubey is an international teacher trainer and Designer who served as VC / Provost Anant National University India’s first Design X University. Prof Chaubey was addressing School Teachers during a Design Thinking Worskhop at National Innovations Public School Shopian yesterday. Information & PR, J&K Office of Chief Minister, J&K Information & PR, Budgam Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Waheed Ur Rehman Para Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Tanvir Sadiq Naeem Akhtar Office of LG J&K
1:29

People Living near Flood Zones of Kashmir must build Majuli Assam type Houses to prevent from Flooding suggests Prof Anunaya Chaubey Founder of Ongroud Design Foundation. Prof Chaubey is an international teacher trainer and Designer who served as VC / Provost Anant National University India’s first Design X University. Prof Chaubey was addressing School Teachers during a Design Thinking Worskhop at National Innovations Public School Shopian yesterday. Information & PR, J&K Office of Chief Minister, J&K Information & PR, Budgam Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Waheed Ur Rehman Para Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi Tanvir Sadiq Naeem Akhtar Office of LG J&K

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

18,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Washrooms at Samroli - NH-44 -Srinagar Jammu Highway are so dirty - For last 20 years they are like that. Lots of Funds are collected by the local Masjid Committee but they give no services ? Distt Adm Udhampur & NHAI have also failed to provide any facilities. Women face problems especially ? Request RDD Minister Office of Javid Ahmad Dar and DC Udhampur Minga Sherpa to Intervene- Office of Chief Minister, J&K SBM-G, Jammu and Kashmir National Highways Information & PR, Udhampur Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Waheed Ur Rehman Para Sakina Itoo JAVED AHMED RANA Javed Dar Tanvir Sadiq Mutaharra A W Deva Naeem Akhtar
4:14

The Washrooms at Samroli - NH-44 -Srinagar Jammu Highway are so dirty - For last 20 years they are like that. Lots of Funds are collected by the local Masjid Committee but they give no services ? Distt Adm Udhampur & NHAI have also failed to provide any facilities. Women face problems especially ? Request RDD Minister Office of Javid Ahmad Dar and DC Udhampur Minga Sherpa to Intervene- Office of Chief Minister, J&K SBM-G, Jammu and Kashmir National Highways Information & PR, Udhampur Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Waheed Ur Rehman Para Sakina Itoo JAVED AHMED RANA Javed Dar Tanvir Sadiq Mutaharra A W Deva Naeem Akhtar

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

14,728 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A massive dumping site has been created next to Eidgah in Hatigam, Bijbehara. Tonnes of garbage strewn all over isn’t just a health hazard but also much of this trash is entering the fresh water stream right below. Dumping sites all over Kashmir are being erected without a care for people or the environment? Why can’t we live in harmony with Kashmir’s fragile ecology? Directorate of Urban Local Bodies Kashmir Deputy Commissioner Anantnag Information & PR Anantnag Office of Chief Minister, J&K Dr Bilal M Bhat IAS Central Pollution Control Board
1:35

A massive dumping site has been created next to Eidgah in Hatigam, Bijbehara. Tonnes of garbage strewn all over isn’t just a health hazard but also much of this trash is entering the fresh water stream right below. Dumping sites all over Kashmir are being erected without a care for people or the environment? Why can’t we live in harmony with Kashmir’s fragile ecology? Directorate of Urban Local Bodies Kashmir Deputy Commissioner Anantnag Information & PR Anantnag Office of Chief Minister, J&K Dr Bilal M Bhat IAS Central Pollution Control Board

Iltija Mufti

16,168 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Another Murder of Green Trees inside Degree College Anantnag Campus ! For making a Concrete drain 40 to 50 year old Popular, Willow , Kikar and other trees Axed? Is the College Administration or R&B Department not aware of the fact that Supreme Court has imposed blanket ban on cutting of fully grown Trees in T N Godavarman case. Are they not aware that our AQI has reached 400 + & these trees are our Saviours ? I have No Words- Will Elected Govt blame LG adm for this as well? Office of Chief Minister, J&K Sakina Itoo Deputy Commissioner Anantnag Nasir Sogami Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Central Pollution Control Board MoEF&CC M Y Tarigami RJ Nasir RJ Sameen Hilal Ahmad Shah Greater Kashmir Kashmir Observer®
2:21

Another Murder of Green Trees inside Degree College Anantnag Campus ! For making a Concrete drain 40 to 50 year old Popular, Willow , Kikar and other trees Axed? Is the College Administration or R&B Department not aware of the fact that Supreme Court has imposed blanket ban on cutting of fully grown Trees in T N Godavarman case. Are they not aware that our AQI has reached 400 + & these trees are our Saviours ? I have No Words- Will Elected Govt blame LG adm for this as well? Office of Chief Minister, J&K Sakina Itoo Deputy Commissioner Anantnag Nasir Sogami Dr Veeri. ‏ڈاکٹر وِیری Central Pollution Control Board MoEF&CC M Y Tarigami RJ Nasir RJ Sameen Hilal Ahmad Shah Greater Kashmir Kashmir Observer®

Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat

15,907 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

First of all I believe this is nothing but propaganda being pushed around by Hon’ble MP Srinagar Agha Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi. Sir, with due respect the checking you are talking about is the same checking where J&K Police have seized crores worth of drugs. These nakas and checkpoints are there to prevent drug trafficking terrorism and other unlawful activities and to keep people safe. If you take responsibility for such unlawful activities, perhaps then the police can reconsider these measures. I am a civilian a youth and a student. My friends and I travel regularly. We are from #Pulwama and sometimes we even travel at night for picnics to Pahalgam, Gulmarg trips or other places. Police ask where we are from check the vehicle and if everything is fine, they simply say Go, beta no worries. At most we are delayed by two or three minutes. And honestly that two or three minute check is also a protection for us. These very checkpoints have helped bust drug networks and maintain security so that unnecessary incidents do not happen in Kashmir. And Ruhullah Sahab, I genuinely don’t understand what you are talking about. I am a Gen-Z student. Before 2019 I witnessed what Kashmir was like. In 2016 I couldn’t even regularly attend my classes. We witnessed blood on the streets, pellets, shutdowns, hartals, closed markets and schools being affected. Today markets are open. People are travelling. People are going out at night. Tourism is growing. People are living their lives. So what exactly are you talking about? Do you want us to spread hate and propaganda? Because that is what your question seems to be encouraging. And please don’t compare #Kashmir with #POK. And sir no one’s voice has been silenced. People openly speak about their rights criticize governments and criticize politicians on social media every day. Everyone has the right to speak. As for people in jail we also feel for their families. May Allah ease their pain. If someone is innocent the law should ensure justice. But if someone is guilty, they must face the consequences according to the law. If I commit a serious crime tomorrow, does that mean I should be released the next day? If I become a drug peddler and the police catch me, does that mean I should immediately be free? No. If I have committed a crime I have to face the law. And regarding jobs, no one has simply snatched people’s jobs. Under SRO-43, jobs have been provided to genuine victims real Martyrs and families affected by terrorism. Where action has been taken against someone there are legal reasons behind it particularly in cases involving links to or support for terrorism. I could say much more on this, but I think I will leave it here. #Kashmir
4:28

First of all I believe this is nothing but propaganda being pushed around by Hon’ble MP Srinagar Agha Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi. Sir, with due respect the checking you are talking about is the same checking where J&K Police have seized crores worth of drugs. These nakas and checkpoints are there to prevent drug trafficking terrorism and other unlawful activities and to keep people safe. If you take responsibility for such unlawful activities, perhaps then the police can reconsider these measures. I am a civilian a youth and a student. My friends and I travel regularly. We are from #Pulwama and sometimes we even travel at night for picnics to Pahalgam, Gulmarg trips or other places. Police ask where we are from check the vehicle and if everything is fine, they simply say Go, beta no worries. At most we are delayed by two or three minutes. And honestly that two or three minute check is also a protection for us. These very checkpoints have helped bust drug networks and maintain security so that unnecessary incidents do not happen in Kashmir. And Ruhullah Sahab, I genuinely don’t understand what you are talking about. I am a Gen-Z student. Before 2019 I witnessed what Kashmir was like. In 2016 I couldn’t even regularly attend my classes. We witnessed blood on the streets, pellets, shutdowns, hartals, closed markets and schools being affected. Today markets are open. People are travelling. People are going out at night. Tourism is growing. People are living their lives. So what exactly are you talking about? Do you want us to spread hate and propaganda? Because that is what your question seems to be encouraging. And please don’t compare #Kashmir with #POK. And sir no one’s voice has been silenced. People openly speak about their rights criticize governments and criticize politicians on social media every day. Everyone has the right to speak. As for people in jail we also feel for their families. May Allah ease their pain. If someone is innocent the law should ensure justice. But if someone is guilty, they must face the consequences according to the law. If I commit a serious crime tomorrow, does that mean I should be released the next day? If I become a drug peddler and the police catch me, does that mean I should immediately be free? No. If I have committed a crime I have to face the law. And regarding jobs, no one has simply snatched people’s jobs. Under SRO-43, jobs have been provided to genuine victims real Martyrs and families affected by terrorism. Where action has been taken against someone there are legal reasons behind it particularly in cases involving links to or support for terrorism. I could say much more on this, but I think I will leave it here. #Kashmir

Jasib Shabir Bhat

70,251 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.
12:38

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,006 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Is a Toronto police lawyer dictating who should and shouldn't get arrested? Falguni Debnath serves as general counsel and chief's counsel for the Toronto Police Service, and according to Mayor Olivia Chow, she might be the reason more hate crime charges haven't been laid during weekly antisemitic protests in a predominantly Jewish neighbourhood in the city. Once upon a decade, there was a somewhat cheesy TV game show called To Tell the Truth. As the title implies, the celebrity panel and the audience at home had to figure out which lone contestant was being sincere, and which other contestants were lying through their teeth. Welcome to the 2025 version of To Tell the Truth, Toronto style. You see, our friend Joe Warmington recently had a scoop in the pages of the Toronto Sun. In fact, thanks to Joe, it looks like we have some answers regarding why the Toronto Police Service continues to turn a blind eye to antisemitism. And it’s shocking stuff. Warmington reported that Mayor Olivia Chow said that Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw told her that the police have their hands tied when it comes to charging pro-Hamas thugs with antisemitism. Now, why would that be? Well, Mayor Chow said that according to the chief, a “lawyer at headquarters” said to him “don’t bother” laying hate charges against the pro-Hamas reprobates because it will be hard to get a conviction in court. Wow. Can you imagine what policing would be like if this was standard procedure for all crimes? Imagine if cops always had to second guess themselves before laying charges? Imagine if cops had to ponder whether a criminal charge would stand up in court? We thought the cops were supposed to lay charges when they see criminal acts taking place and then let the courts figure out if the accused is guilty or not guilty. And if the system didn’t work that way, then really, what’s the use of having a police force in the first place? Ah, but here’s where things get very interesting. You see, Chief Demkiw says he never said such a thing to Mayor Chow. That means only one thing: either the chief or the mayor is lying. So, the question is: who is lying — and why? It should be noted that Warmington was able to obtain the name of this uber-powerful lawyer at police headquarters who is allegedly directing the Toronto Police Service. She is Falguni Debnath. Sources told Warmington she’s the general counsel for the Toronto Police Service and a prominent figure at headquarters. And she is allegedly not well liked. The police website states that Debnath joined the force in 2024 after working in the past with the Federal Department of Justice and the Ontario Court of Appeal. When introducing her to the Toronto Police Services Board on September 12, 2024, Chief Myron Demkiw said: We have confirmed the appointment of Falguni Debnath as general counsel and chief’s counsel…Falguni is a seasoned litigator with over 25 years of legal and leadership experience with governments, courts, and the United Nations… "In addition to her extensive experience litigating complex and high-profile matters, she has provided legal, strategic, and policy advice to the Chief Justice of Ontario, the Deputy Attorney General of Ontario, a Commissioner of an Inquiry, and the head of a UN War Crimes Tribunal. In her most recent role as international lead lawyer for the United Nations, she led a team of international lawyers representing over 5,000 survivors of war crimes and genocide. She has also prosecuted war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and breaches of the Vienna Convention." Here's our take: Falguni’s ties to the United Nations just might explain her motivation in terms of advising the police not go after antisemites. After all, you’d be hard pressed to find a more antisemitic organization than the United Nations. The UN is obsessed with condemning Isreal while turning a blind to the worst human rights abusers in the world. The UN exists as an anti-Israel joke. So, is this why Falguni has a soft spot in her heart for the Hamasholes? Thugs that have spent more than two years harassing Jews and pro-Israel supporters? We wouldn’t bet against it. But we always believe in getting the other side of the story. So, we reached out to Stephanie Sayer with the media relations department of the Toronto police. We also CC’d Chief Demkiw and Debnath herself. Here were our nine questions: 1⃣ Did Chief Demkiw say this to Mayor Chow or not? [By “this” we are referring to Debnath advising the chief not to lay charges against pro-Hamas demonstrators]. 2⃣ If he didn’t say this, why is Mayor Chow alleging he did? As well, why has Mayro Chow not retracted her statement if it is incorrect? 3️⃣ Why does Ms. Debnath feel that hate crime convictions are unlikely? 4️⃣ For more than two years now, we have chronicled demonstrations by masked pro-Hamas people. They have marched into predominately Jewish neighbourhoods, openly called for the genocide of the Jewish people; displayed swastikas; brandished fake hand grenades and suicide vests; and have even cosplayed as Sinwar, the terrorist mastermind of Oct. 7, 2023. How is it that Ms. Debnath allegedly believes that these egregious acts don’t meet the benchmark of a hate crime? 5️⃣ In addition to hate crimes, why are the police turning a blind eye to other laws being routinely violated? This includes harassment, trespassing, and the blocking of live intersections? 6️⃣ What role did Ms. Debnath (or other TPS lawyers) play in advising police officers not to enforce the law? 7️⃣ As you likely know, [David Menzies] was falsely arrested three times in 2024. Ezra Levant was also falsely arrested once. This was merely for practicing journalism in public. What role did Ms. Debnath have in advising police to arrest independent media? And what the real reason for these arrests? 8️⃣ How was it that Ms. Debnath came to be employed by the TPS? Did she receive a referral from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when the then-PM met with Chief Demkiw in January 2024? 9️⃣ Would it be possible to arrange an interview with Ms. Debnath and Chief Demkiw? But at time of deadline, no response was received. Which is, alas, standard procedure when it comes to how the Toronto Police Service deals with independent media outlets. We should point out we also reached out to Mayor Chow’s office for comment. Predictably, it’s crickets… By the way, we’ve heard from sources that the Toronto police brass are furious with Warmington’s story as well as his “outing” of Debnath. Well, too bad, so sad. In the final analysis, the Chief of Police and the Mayor of Toronto must be transparent with the people of Toronto and the free press. Especially when it comes to the ongoing hatred that continues to go unchecked on the streets of Hogtown. But instead, we get this embarrassing he said/she said political kabuki theatre playing out. Oh, and by the way, while both the chief and the mayor are lying liars who can’t stop telling lies, when it comes to this file, we believe Mayor Chow is telling the truth. In any event, we can’t seem to get any answers via email or phone. So, we headed down to police headquarters to find out what’s what, and we brought our beautiful Jumbotron-equipped truck with us to demand some much needed transparency from those who enjoy swank six-figure salaries paid for by the taxpayer. Spoiler alert: nobody was available to speak with us. Shameful. David Menzies
21:24

Is a Toronto police lawyer dictating who should and shouldn't get arrested? Falguni Debnath serves as general counsel and chief's counsel for the Toronto Police Service, and according to Mayor Olivia Chow, she might be the reason more hate crime charges haven't been laid during weekly antisemitic protests in a predominantly Jewish neighbourhood in the city. Once upon a decade, there was a somewhat cheesy TV game show called To Tell the Truth. As the title implies, the celebrity panel and the audience at home had to figure out which lone contestant was being sincere, and which other contestants were lying through their teeth. Welcome to the 2025 version of To Tell the Truth, Toronto style. You see, our friend Joe Warmington recently had a scoop in the pages of the Toronto Sun. In fact, thanks to Joe, it looks like we have some answers regarding why the Toronto Police Service continues to turn a blind eye to antisemitism. And it’s shocking stuff. Warmington reported that Mayor Olivia Chow said that Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw told her that the police have their hands tied when it comes to charging pro-Hamas thugs with antisemitism. Now, why would that be? Well, Mayor Chow said that according to the chief, a “lawyer at headquarters” said to him “don’t bother” laying hate charges against the pro-Hamas reprobates because it will be hard to get a conviction in court. Wow. Can you imagine what policing would be like if this was standard procedure for all crimes? Imagine if cops always had to second guess themselves before laying charges? Imagine if cops had to ponder whether a criminal charge would stand up in court? We thought the cops were supposed to lay charges when they see criminal acts taking place and then let the courts figure out if the accused is guilty or not guilty. And if the system didn’t work that way, then really, what’s the use of having a police force in the first place? Ah, but here’s where things get very interesting. You see, Chief Demkiw says he never said such a thing to Mayor Chow. That means only one thing: either the chief or the mayor is lying. So, the question is: who is lying — and why? It should be noted that Warmington was able to obtain the name of this uber-powerful lawyer at police headquarters who is allegedly directing the Toronto Police Service. She is Falguni Debnath. Sources told Warmington she’s the general counsel for the Toronto Police Service and a prominent figure at headquarters. And she is allegedly not well liked. The police website states that Debnath joined the force in 2024 after working in the past with the Federal Department of Justice and the Ontario Court of Appeal. When introducing her to the Toronto Police Services Board on September 12, 2024, Chief Myron Demkiw said: We have confirmed the appointment of Falguni Debnath as general counsel and chief’s counsel…Falguni is a seasoned litigator with over 25 years of legal and leadership experience with governments, courts, and the United Nations… "In addition to her extensive experience litigating complex and high-profile matters, she has provided legal, strategic, and policy advice to the Chief Justice of Ontario, the Deputy Attorney General of Ontario, a Commissioner of an Inquiry, and the head of a UN War Crimes Tribunal. In her most recent role as international lead lawyer for the United Nations, she led a team of international lawyers representing over 5,000 survivors of war crimes and genocide. She has also prosecuted war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and breaches of the Vienna Convention." Here's our take: Falguni’s ties to the United Nations just might explain her motivation in terms of advising the police not go after antisemites. After all, you’d be hard pressed to find a more antisemitic organization than the United Nations. The UN is obsessed with condemning Isreal while turning a blind to the worst human rights abusers in the world. The UN exists as an anti-Israel joke. So, is this why Falguni has a soft spot in her heart for the Hamasholes? Thugs that have spent more than two years harassing Jews and pro-Israel supporters? We wouldn’t bet against it. But we always believe in getting the other side of the story. So, we reached out to Stephanie Sayer with the media relations department of the Toronto police. We also CC’d Chief Demkiw and Debnath herself. Here were our nine questions: 1⃣ Did Chief Demkiw say this to Mayor Chow or not? [By “this” we are referring to Debnath advising the chief not to lay charges against pro-Hamas demonstrators]. 2⃣ If he didn’t say this, why is Mayor Chow alleging he did? As well, why has Mayro Chow not retracted her statement if it is incorrect? 3️⃣ Why does Ms. Debnath feel that hate crime convictions are unlikely? 4️⃣ For more than two years now, we have chronicled demonstrations by masked pro-Hamas people. They have marched into predominately Jewish neighbourhoods, openly called for the genocide of the Jewish people; displayed swastikas; brandished fake hand grenades and suicide vests; and have even cosplayed as Sinwar, the terrorist mastermind of Oct. 7, 2023. How is it that Ms. Debnath allegedly believes that these egregious acts don’t meet the benchmark of a hate crime? 5️⃣ In addition to hate crimes, why are the police turning a blind eye to other laws being routinely violated? This includes harassment, trespassing, and the blocking of live intersections? 6️⃣ What role did Ms. Debnath (or other TPS lawyers) play in advising police officers not to enforce the law? 7️⃣ As you likely know, [David Menzies] was falsely arrested three times in 2024. Ezra Levant was also falsely arrested once. This was merely for practicing journalism in public. What role did Ms. Debnath have in advising police to arrest independent media? And what the real reason for these arrests? 8️⃣ How was it that Ms. Debnath came to be employed by the TPS? Did she receive a referral from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when the then-PM met with Chief Demkiw in January 2024? 9️⃣ Would it be possible to arrange an interview with Ms. Debnath and Chief Demkiw? But at time of deadline, no response was received. Which is, alas, standard procedure when it comes to how the Toronto Police Service deals with independent media outlets. We should point out we also reached out to Mayor Chow’s office for comment. Predictably, it’s crickets… By the way, we’ve heard from sources that the Toronto police brass are furious with Warmington’s story as well as his “outing” of Debnath. Well, too bad, so sad. In the final analysis, the Chief of Police and the Mayor of Toronto must be transparent with the people of Toronto and the free press. Especially when it comes to the ongoing hatred that continues to go unchecked on the streets of Hogtown. But instead, we get this embarrassing he said/she said political kabuki theatre playing out. Oh, and by the way, while both the chief and the mayor are lying liars who can’t stop telling lies, when it comes to this file, we believe Mayor Chow is telling the truth. In any event, we can’t seem to get any answers via email or phone. So, we headed down to police headquarters to find out what’s what, and we brought our beautiful Jumbotron-equipped truck with us to demand some much needed transparency from those who enjoy swank six-figure salaries paid for by the taxpayer. Spoiler alert: nobody was available to speak with us. Shameful. David Menzies

Rebel News

21,016 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Now that Mr Andrew Mwenda is done issuing a groveling, much needed apology to President Yoweri K Museveni; as well as telling us how he personally knows Bill Gates, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, can we try and understand that DEI Pharma thing using basic common sense? First off; it appears that there’s general agreement that if Uganda wants to have regional industry leaders across different sectors, the state must have a hand and that this can’t be shrouded in mystery, backdoor dealings and corruption. This is not up for debate. With the foregoing, I’ll invite you to scrutinize these investments dispassionately. I’ll start with DEI Pharma coz I’ve spent 20 years building in this space. I know it quite well. From available information, the Government of Uganda has invested 1 trillion shillings in the Matugga based pharmaceutical greenfield for a 9% stake. This figure isn’t easily verifiable because a lot of the documents underpinning these public investments are nearly impossible to get. Even the LOP didn’t seem to know . A clear red flag. (See video in frame 1) We rely on parliamentary committee clips and statements from people like Hon. Dr. Patrick Wakida who is the board chairman of that entity from which he solicits “friendly loans” in millions of dollars. But that’s a story for another day. Going with the UGX 1 trillion shilling investment, Uganda is valuing this entity-by a guy whose entire experience in pharma manufacturing doesn’t go beyond failing at running a flour mill-at just under 3 Billion dollars. For African comparison; Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Ltd, the South African conglomerate that’s the largest manufacturer in Africa, has a market cap of 3.6 Billion Dollars (see frame 2). By local comparison, CIPLA-Quality Chemicals has a market cap of UGX 511 Billion or 132 million dollars (see frame 3). At the time the government made that investment in DEI, the market cap of Cipla-QC was less than UGX 250 Billion. In fact, back in 2023, an investment firm from Mauritius bought controlling stake for under $30 million (here: Basically, the government values this DEI entity more than 25 times higher than a proven pharmaceutical manufacturer of global repute; one backed by the third largest pharmaceutical manufacturer in India; with a history going back nearly 100 years! This is an entity run by a guy who lied to the country that he had found a cure for covid and embarrassed us to no end; a guy who seems to essentially buy publications and slaps his name on them; a guy severally accused of conning people in mineral deals (see frame 4 and other sources on request). You don’t have to be a CFA, CPA, MBA or a finance genius to know that this is theft by valuation. Mr Magoola, you might recall, said upon receipt of the first government investment that the company didn’t even need government money but nonetheless, it was going to pay it back in no time. Same company at the time that had its assets on auction for failure to service debt. Same guy is said to be back for an additional 1.6 trillion shillings in government investment. For this, he has piles of cassava in Kamuli and badly pronounced monoclonal antibody brands to show for our investment. (NTV UGANDA did a recent piece on this. You can find it here: If indeed the government was serious about growing the pharmaceutical industry, they could have spread this investment around into already existing industries and put in place some market protection measures. Putting all this cash in the hands of a man with at best, a dubious history of financial management and no discernible pharmaceutical manufacturing success is a risk at proportions that are hard to describe. We have the example of Malta to show how smart investment in pharmaceutical technology/industry can actually drive economic growth. Why don’t we take those examples instead of betting on snake-oil vendors? How are these promoters chosen? #DEIPharmaHeist
3:38

Now that Mr Andrew Mwenda is done issuing a groveling, much needed apology to President Yoweri K Museveni; as well as telling us how he personally knows Bill Gates, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, can we try and understand that DEI Pharma thing using basic common sense? First off; it appears that there’s general agreement that if Uganda wants to have regional industry leaders across different sectors, the state must have a hand and that this can’t be shrouded in mystery, backdoor dealings and corruption. This is not up for debate. With the foregoing, I’ll invite you to scrutinize these investments dispassionately. I’ll start with DEI Pharma coz I’ve spent 20 years building in this space. I know it quite well. From available information, the Government of Uganda has invested 1 trillion shillings in the Matugga based pharmaceutical greenfield for a 9% stake. This figure isn’t easily verifiable because a lot of the documents underpinning these public investments are nearly impossible to get. Even the LOP didn’t seem to know . A clear red flag. (See video in frame 1) We rely on parliamentary committee clips and statements from people like Hon. Dr. Patrick Wakida who is the board chairman of that entity from which he solicits “friendly loans” in millions of dollars. But that’s a story for another day. Going with the UGX 1 trillion shilling investment, Uganda is valuing this entity-by a guy whose entire experience in pharma manufacturing doesn’t go beyond failing at running a flour mill-at just under 3 Billion dollars. For African comparison; Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Ltd, the South African conglomerate that’s the largest manufacturer in Africa, has a market cap of 3.6 Billion Dollars (see frame 2). By local comparison, CIPLA-Quality Chemicals has a market cap of UGX 511 Billion or 132 million dollars (see frame 3). At the time the government made that investment in DEI, the market cap of Cipla-QC was less than UGX 250 Billion. In fact, back in 2023, an investment firm from Mauritius bought controlling stake for under $30 million (here: Basically, the government values this DEI entity more than 25 times higher than a proven pharmaceutical manufacturer of global repute; one backed by the third largest pharmaceutical manufacturer in India; with a history going back nearly 100 years! This is an entity run by a guy who lied to the country that he had found a cure for covid and embarrassed us to no end; a guy who seems to essentially buy publications and slaps his name on them; a guy severally accused of conning people in mineral deals (see frame 4 and other sources on request). You don’t have to be a CFA, CPA, MBA or a finance genius to know that this is theft by valuation. Mr Magoola, you might recall, said upon receipt of the first government investment that the company didn’t even need government money but nonetheless, it was going to pay it back in no time. Same company at the time that had its assets on auction for failure to service debt. Same guy is said to be back for an additional 1.6 trillion shillings in government investment. For this, he has piles of cassava in Kamuli and badly pronounced monoclonal antibody brands to show for our investment. (NTV UGANDA did a recent piece on this. You can find it here: If indeed the government was serious about growing the pharmaceutical industry, they could have spread this investment around into already existing industries and put in place some market protection measures. Putting all this cash in the hands of a man with at best, a dubious history of financial management and no discernible pharmaceutical manufacturing success is a risk at proportions that are hard to describe. We have the example of Malta to show how smart investment in pharmaceutical technology/industry can actually drive economic growth. Why don’t we take those examples instead of betting on snake-oil vendors? How are these promoters chosen? #DEIPharmaHeist

Anthony Natif

59,382 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

2017 Capitulation Tour ⚔️ The plan to save the world has been in the making for many years. To the casual onlooker, the outworking of that plan may have looked a whole lot more sinister. This plan required precision and had to be designed carefully. It was the only way to stop the incredible crimes being carried out around the world. These crimes involved the children. It had to stop. And… stop it did. Follow through as The Q White Hat Military Alliance With The Commander in Chief takes down one world leader after another. Sometimes he managed whole groups at one time. I thank Charlie Freak for the information given on his video. View below. Before we get into this post, let’s make sure we understand the meaning of the word ‘capitulate’ taken from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Definition of ‘capitulate‘ intransitive verb a: to surrender, often after negotiation of terms The enemy was forced to capitulate unconditionally. b: to cease resisting : ACQUIESCE The company capitulated to the labor union to avoid a strike. CAPITULATE stresses the fact of ending all resistance and may imply either a coming to terms (as with an adversary) or hopelessness in the face of an irresistible opposing force. Some Synonyms for ‘capitulate’ bow, concede, give in, knuckle under, quit, relent, submit, succumb, surrender, yield Why is this important? It’s important because this is exactly what the heads of each country around the world did when faced with dossiers of factual information about their ‘misdemeanors’. When 🎖️The Commander In Chief 🎖️was inaugurated, there was something keeping him busy for about 18 months. During that time he traveled the world visiting the country heads. On arrival, he presented them with huge dossiers: Definition of ‘dossier‘ Taken from Merriam-Webster Dictionary A file containing detailed records on a particular person or subject. Examples: The patient’s medical dossier Police began compiling a dossier on him. These huge dossiers contained damning information against the recipients. More often than not, the information related to one or more of the following: ▶️Human Trafficking ▶️Satanic Rituals ▶️Pedophilia ▶️Sex Trafficking Regarding children (Notice: I tried to use these words in a different order but continually ended up with an error/warning that wouldn’t allow it! Interesting!) and other abominations! A choice: To capitulate to President Trump. Or refuse to concede and therefore be arrested on the spot! Q plan to save the world It’s important that you realise that this is not just President Trump’s plan alone. There is a complete team of White Hats (good people who only want good for this world) working alongside him. He acts as the face to these people, and was chosen because of his tenacity and determination to see a job through to the end. Every country, because of the sheer amount of damning evidence against them, capitulated. It happened either immediately, or by the next morning, after they had had time to peruse the contents. Step #1 Saudi Arabia🏳️⤵️ (July 2017) During President Trump’s visit, the Saudi’s capitulated to him. They had to show everyone else that they had done so: They had just performed the Sword Dance. Only the King is allowed to hold the sword during the Sword Dance Ritual, but here we see it being held by President Trump. That was the sign. The new Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (now King) works very closely with President Trump and Team in aiding to drain the swamp. Step #2 Israel🏳️⤵️ Some of the Saudi’s then went with President Trump to his next destination. They were earning points towards their own salvation, so they wouldn’t be as harshly punished as they could have been. These Saudi’s, because of the capitulation, are now a part of the White Hats, helping ferret out others they know are involved in the same kind of abominations. The Israelite’s really balked at what President Trump was saying. It took an extra day before they finally gave in. They were the hardest country of all. How do we know they capitulated? That was when they agreed to allow the movement of U.S.A’s embassy to Jerusalem. This symbolizes who is in power in Israel. It was a symbolic act. Step #3 – Vatican City🏳️⤵️ His next move, a few days later, was to turns up at the Vatican to see Pope Francis. The dossier they had was so very huge! Vatican – Pope Francis (very sad) capitulates to President Trump (very happy)! Why did they have to concede? Actually, there were many reasons why, but that’s a story for another time. Please do your own research. The Pope would certainly not have surrendered unless the evidence against him and the church was solid and true! The plan to save the world from this evil stranglehold: Step #4 – Brussels European Parliament for the EU NATO 🏳️ President Trump called everyone together, then he purposefully arrived late, causing them to sweat it out as to what was going on! He walked in late and threw the big folder on the table. He said “We have it all!” In a very short time, they all capitulated! In the days after this, the EU backed down on Brexit, and other issues were taken care of. From this point on, the United States no longer paid for NATO. He told them they could now pay. They obeyed, because now he was in charge! Trump’s visit to Brussels paid off well… they were all there! All these officials would not have capitulated if the evidence against them wasn’t as solid as a rock. Step #5 CEO's From Major Corparations 🏳️ Google Twitter Microsoft Apple Facebook Black Rock Vanguard etc These people are all minions, or puppets, for the New World Order (One World Government). He showed them all the documentation the NSA (National Security Agency) had against them. Bin Salman said they either come onboard and play for Team Trump, (as he is in total control of these corporations), or declass! All of the information would be declassified, one by one, and each one of them would be shown to the masses as a child-murderer! They all capitulated! 🏳️ Bin Salman sees Jack Dorsey (Twitter) Bin Salman sees Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) The interesting thing is that President Trump is the owner of all these Media outlets now, even though it’s kept quiet. All the troubles people experience with them today is not because of these ‘heads’. It’s because President Trump is trying to get us all to see what these people have been up to… and to take a stand! Interesting Note: It’s the same with each country. He wants the people within the country to see just how bad their leaders were… and to take a stand against them. Gradually it’s happening, as more and more people take to the streets in peaceful protests etc. Asian Tour (November 2017) Step #6 Japan🏳️⤵️ This is the symbolic gesture where President Trump presents the winner’s trophy. This is done only by the highest figure in the land! Japan is now in submission to President Trump, the NSA and the *Q* Team. Step #7 South Korea/North Korea 🏳️⤵️ One of the biggest procurers of Adrenochrome has always been Asia, and South East Asia. They were deeply involved with Hollywood and Washington DC politicians. These people needed children for their drugs and have leaned heavily on the South East Asian governments. It’s been going on for many years. As he showed them all the documents, and because they knew their crimes were capital punishment acts, they all capitulated. In secret, he went to the North Korean border and began his peace talks with Kim Jong-un. Step #8 China🏳️⤵️ Soon after President Trump became president, the Chinese president paid him a visit. This was largely ignored by the mainstream media. Chinese President Xi Jinping vists Trump. In the Forbidden City at Trump’s request. The method used by China to show they had surrended to Trump was to allow him into the Forbidden City. By the Chinese president allowing this, it is bigger than we can possibly understand or imagine! One of the biggest surprises was to learn how the Chinese wanted communism kicked out of their country! They met Trump with open arms. Many terrible things were going on in China. Step #9 Vietnam 🏳️⤵️ In a very public ceremony, President Trump was placed slightly in front of the Vietnamese president, and to the right. The Vietnamese promised to stop their participation in procuring children, human tracking and such-like. They gave in easily. Step #10 Davos, Switzerland🏳️⤵️ (Early January, 2018) President Trump called this meeting in Davos, Switzerland. It contained the ‘Who’s Who’ of all the major companies, including George Soros. Much evil was in attendance. Remember, President Trump was outworking his plan to save the world! All these people were all presented with envelopes the day before. At the meeting above, they were given folders which stated all the NSA information collected on them. Underneath these mountains were a great many very deep tunnels. It was a very brave move by President Trump to even go there. He so easily could have disappeared forever ‘down below’! But of-course, he wouldn’t have gone there alone. They very quickly capitulated, after a night of sweating it out. They were told they would be made public, one by one, with all they had done if they didn’t surrender. Step #11 India Prime Minister of India🏳️⤵️ … Narendra Modi, after capitulating to Trump. He was the first of many Prime Ministers to hold hands in such a way that suggested their hands were tied… It said: ‘I’m sorry, my hands are tied.’ Central America Step #12🏳️⤵️ Mexico President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrado (AMLO) of Mexico really resisted, but finally surrendered to Trump. Step #13 The rest of the Central American Countries After Mexico, 🏳️⤵️ he went to all the rest of the countries in Central America. They all did as they had to. Once again, they all held their wrists together as if they were being bound and forced into doing it. In a way they were… capitulate and help Team Trump, or be exposed and receive the capital punishment immediately. Step #14 Brazil🏳️⤵️ President Jair Bolsonaro They held a public meeting where once again this president held his wrists together in submission. One of the first acts of Bolsonara was to arrest ‘John of God’ who was running one of the largest child-trafficking rings. Note: This is the kind of thing all the Presidents/Prime Ministers did in all the countries around the world. They arranged the arrest of known pedophilia people within their country. Step #15 Argentina 🏳️⤵️ President Mauricio Macri left standing alone on the stage. President Trump makes a power move showing he believed him to be the scum of the earth! Step #16 Canada 🏳️⤵️ Prime Minister Justin Trudeau capitulated with his hands clasped together as if he were in handcuffs. Step # 17 Germany🏳️⤵️ Chancellor Angela Merkel capitulated Step #18 France🏳️⤵️ President Emmanuel Macron submitted. President Trump made a show of him because he was a real Adrenochromer! Step #19 England🏳️⤵️ Prime Minister Teresa May Here she is crying. Not only because of all the dirt they had on her, but because President Trump was able to inform her that the Phoneticians were planning to assassinate her. Their reason was to be able to put Boris Johnson in. Boris Johnson is a strong character who may simply be playing a role for the White Hats. Not sure…. time will tell. President Trump appears to act extremely rudely with the Queen. He took no care where he walked. This was deliberate and showed the capitulation. Step #20 Russia🏳️⤵️ President Vladimir Putin As he famously said ‘The ball is in your court now!’ This reference meant that they were now working for Trump. The ball also had reference to Adrenochrome. So there you have it. Not every country is mentioned in Charlie’s video, including Australia and New Zealand… but the truth is, PT didn’t stop until all the world leaders were in agreement to leave behind the filthy use of the little children of this world. All those who did participate in it will either receive capital punishment (death sentence) or spend the rest of their lives inn an inescapable prison. Here The Video Charlie Freak & Bonfire Guy The Take Down Of The Cabal From A to Z
1:43:57

2017 Capitulation Tour ⚔️ The plan to save the world has been in the making for many years. To the casual onlooker, the outworking of that plan may have looked a whole lot more sinister. This plan required precision and had to be designed carefully. It was the only way to stop the incredible crimes being carried out around the world. These crimes involved the children. It had to stop. And… stop it did. Follow through as The Q White Hat Military Alliance With The Commander in Chief takes down one world leader after another. Sometimes he managed whole groups at one time. I thank Charlie Freak for the information given on his video. View below. Before we get into this post, let’s make sure we understand the meaning of the word ‘capitulate’ taken from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Definition of ‘capitulate‘ intransitive verb a: to surrender, often after negotiation of terms The enemy was forced to capitulate unconditionally. b: to cease resisting : ACQUIESCE The company capitulated to the labor union to avoid a strike. CAPITULATE stresses the fact of ending all resistance and may imply either a coming to terms (as with an adversary) or hopelessness in the face of an irresistible opposing force. Some Synonyms for ‘capitulate’ bow, concede, give in, knuckle under, quit, relent, submit, succumb, surrender, yield Why is this important? It’s important because this is exactly what the heads of each country around the world did when faced with dossiers of factual information about their ‘misdemeanors’. When 🎖️The Commander In Chief 🎖️was inaugurated, there was something keeping him busy for about 18 months. During that time he traveled the world visiting the country heads. On arrival, he presented them with huge dossiers: Definition of ‘dossier‘ Taken from Merriam-Webster Dictionary A file containing detailed records on a particular person or subject. Examples: The patient’s medical dossier Police began compiling a dossier on him. These huge dossiers contained damning information against the recipients. More often than not, the information related to one or more of the following: ▶️Human Trafficking ▶️Satanic Rituals ▶️Pedophilia ▶️Sex Trafficking Regarding children (Notice: I tried to use these words in a different order but continually ended up with an error/warning that wouldn’t allow it! Interesting!) and other abominations! A choice: To capitulate to President Trump. Or refuse to concede and therefore be arrested on the spot! Q plan to save the world It’s important that you realise that this is not just President Trump’s plan alone. There is a complete team of White Hats (good people who only want good for this world) working alongside him. He acts as the face to these people, and was chosen because of his tenacity and determination to see a job through to the end. Every country, because of the sheer amount of damning evidence against them, capitulated. It happened either immediately, or by the next morning, after they had had time to peruse the contents. Step #1 Saudi Arabia🏳️⤵️ (July 2017) During President Trump’s visit, the Saudi’s capitulated to him. They had to show everyone else that they had done so: They had just performed the Sword Dance. Only the King is allowed to hold the sword during the Sword Dance Ritual, but here we see it being held by President Trump. That was the sign. The new Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (now King) works very closely with President Trump and Team in aiding to drain the swamp. Step #2 Israel🏳️⤵️ Some of the Saudi’s then went with President Trump to his next destination. They were earning points towards their own salvation, so they wouldn’t be as harshly punished as they could have been. These Saudi’s, because of the capitulation, are now a part of the White Hats, helping ferret out others they know are involved in the same kind of abominations. The Israelite’s really balked at what President Trump was saying. It took an extra day before they finally gave in. They were the hardest country of all. How do we know they capitulated? That was when they agreed to allow the movement of U.S.A’s embassy to Jerusalem. This symbolizes who is in power in Israel. It was a symbolic act. Step #3 – Vatican City🏳️⤵️ His next move, a few days later, was to turns up at the Vatican to see Pope Francis. The dossier they had was so very huge! Vatican – Pope Francis (very sad) capitulates to President Trump (very happy)! Why did they have to concede? Actually, there were many reasons why, but that’s a story for another time. Please do your own research. The Pope would certainly not have surrendered unless the evidence against him and the church was solid and true! The plan to save the world from this evil stranglehold: Step #4 – Brussels European Parliament for the EU NATO 🏳️ President Trump called everyone together, then he purposefully arrived late, causing them to sweat it out as to what was going on! He walked in late and threw the big folder on the table. He said “We have it all!” In a very short time, they all capitulated! In the days after this, the EU backed down on Brexit, and other issues were taken care of. From this point on, the United States no longer paid for NATO. He told them they could now pay. They obeyed, because now he was in charge! Trump’s visit to Brussels paid off well… they were all there! All these officials would not have capitulated if the evidence against them wasn’t as solid as a rock. Step #5 CEO's From Major Corparations 🏳️ Google Twitter Microsoft Apple Facebook Black Rock Vanguard etc These people are all minions, or puppets, for the New World Order (One World Government). He showed them all the documentation the NSA (National Security Agency) had against them. Bin Salman said they either come onboard and play for Team Trump, (as he is in total control of these corporations), or declass! All of the information would be declassified, one by one, and each one of them would be shown to the masses as a child-murderer! They all capitulated! 🏳️ Bin Salman sees Jack Dorsey (Twitter) Bin Salman sees Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) The interesting thing is that President Trump is the owner of all these Media outlets now, even though it’s kept quiet. All the troubles people experience with them today is not because of these ‘heads’. It’s because President Trump is trying to get us all to see what these people have been up to… and to take a stand! Interesting Note: It’s the same with each country. He wants the people within the country to see just how bad their leaders were… and to take a stand against them. Gradually it’s happening, as more and more people take to the streets in peaceful protests etc. Asian Tour (November 2017) Step #6 Japan🏳️⤵️ This is the symbolic gesture where President Trump presents the winner’s trophy. This is done only by the highest figure in the land! Japan is now in submission to President Trump, the NSA and the *Q* Team. Step #7 South Korea/North Korea 🏳️⤵️ One of the biggest procurers of Adrenochrome has always been Asia, and South East Asia. They were deeply involved with Hollywood and Washington DC politicians. These people needed children for their drugs and have leaned heavily on the South East Asian governments. It’s been going on for many years. As he showed them all the documents, and because they knew their crimes were capital punishment acts, they all capitulated. In secret, he went to the North Korean border and began his peace talks with Kim Jong-un. Step #8 China🏳️⤵️ Soon after President Trump became president, the Chinese president paid him a visit. This was largely ignored by the mainstream media. Chinese President Xi Jinping vists Trump. In the Forbidden City at Trump’s request. The method used by China to show they had surrended to Trump was to allow him into the Forbidden City. By the Chinese president allowing this, it is bigger than we can possibly understand or imagine! One of the biggest surprises was to learn how the Chinese wanted communism kicked out of their country! They met Trump with open arms. Many terrible things were going on in China. Step #9 Vietnam 🏳️⤵️ In a very public ceremony, President Trump was placed slightly in front of the Vietnamese president, and to the right. The Vietnamese promised to stop their participation in procuring children, human tracking and such-like. They gave in easily. Step #10 Davos, Switzerland🏳️⤵️ (Early January, 2018) President Trump called this meeting in Davos, Switzerland. It contained the ‘Who’s Who’ of all the major companies, including George Soros. Much evil was in attendance. Remember, President Trump was outworking his plan to save the world! All these people were all presented with envelopes the day before. At the meeting above, they were given folders which stated all the NSA information collected on them. Underneath these mountains were a great many very deep tunnels. It was a very brave move by President Trump to even go there. He so easily could have disappeared forever ‘down below’! But of-course, he wouldn’t have gone there alone. They very quickly capitulated, after a night of sweating it out. They were told they would be made public, one by one, with all they had done if they didn’t surrender. Step #11 India Prime Minister of India🏳️⤵️ … Narendra Modi, after capitulating to Trump. He was the first of many Prime Ministers to hold hands in such a way that suggested their hands were tied… It said: ‘I’m sorry, my hands are tied.’ Central America Step #12🏳️⤵️ Mexico President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrado (AMLO) of Mexico really resisted, but finally surrendered to Trump. Step #13 The rest of the Central American Countries After Mexico, 🏳️⤵️ he went to all the rest of the countries in Central America. They all did as they had to. Once again, they all held their wrists together as if they were being bound and forced into doing it. In a way they were… capitulate and help Team Trump, or be exposed and receive the capital punishment immediately. Step #14 Brazil🏳️⤵️ President Jair Bolsonaro They held a public meeting where once again this president held his wrists together in submission. One of the first acts of Bolsonara was to arrest ‘John of God’ who was running one of the largest child-trafficking rings. Note: This is the kind of thing all the Presidents/Prime Ministers did in all the countries around the world. They arranged the arrest of known pedophilia people within their country. Step #15 Argentina 🏳️⤵️ President Mauricio Macri left standing alone on the stage. President Trump makes a power move showing he believed him to be the scum of the earth! Step #16 Canada 🏳️⤵️ Prime Minister Justin Trudeau capitulated with his hands clasped together as if he were in handcuffs. Step # 17 Germany🏳️⤵️ Chancellor Angela Merkel capitulated Step #18 France🏳️⤵️ President Emmanuel Macron submitted. President Trump made a show of him because he was a real Adrenochromer! Step #19 England🏳️⤵️ Prime Minister Teresa May Here she is crying. Not only because of all the dirt they had on her, but because President Trump was able to inform her that the Phoneticians were planning to assassinate her. Their reason was to be able to put Boris Johnson in. Boris Johnson is a strong character who may simply be playing a role for the White Hats. Not sure…. time will tell. President Trump appears to act extremely rudely with the Queen. He took no care where he walked. This was deliberate and showed the capitulation. Step #20 Russia🏳️⤵️ President Vladimir Putin As he famously said ‘The ball is in your court now!’ This reference meant that they were now working for Trump. The ball also had reference to Adrenochrome. So there you have it. Not every country is mentioned in Charlie’s video, including Australia and New Zealand… but the truth is, PT didn’t stop until all the world leaders were in agreement to leave behind the filthy use of the little children of this world. All those who did participate in it will either receive capital punishment (death sentence) or spend the rest of their lives inn an inescapable prison. Here The Video Charlie Freak & Bonfire Guy The Take Down Of The Cabal From A to Z

DutchForce17

156,928 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The CIA's information war with American citizens and the operation that started it all. Project Mockingbird. This is one main aspect as to why people are so divided and brainwashed in today's society. Information has always been a crucial component to power and control. Knowledge is power, right? The only difference today from 40+ years ago is that now information flows at a rate that is absolutely mind-boggling and allows you to connect with anyone, at anytime, anywhere in the world, with real-time information 24/7 at your finger tips. So what happens when you have people who are suppose to be giving you accurate, truthful, information, and start to give you information that benefits, manipulates, and persuades the global population with mis and disinformation, protects certain corrupt people and groups by not reporting on other information, and who also lies and slanders other individuals all for the purpose to maintain power and control over the entire population, entirely on PURPOSE? You get what's called PROPAGANDA, aka, a sh*t show of so much purposeful bad and fake information, that it literally starts to persuade and mold the populations overall views and opinions on an array of various topics to fit the nefarious controllers, behind the scenes narrative or agenda. Ultimitely benefitting only them. If you take notice, these campaigns have been around for a long time, depending what side your on, your personal views and where you get your overall information will ultimately decide or be a factor of how much it has affected you or how much you are aware of the deception in the first place. Most legacy mainstream media groups are owned and operated by a small group of wealthy globalist individuals who seem to lean towards the left, and some leaning even farther left than others. These campaigns started to really pick up when Trump entered the picture in 2016. Trump was never suppose to win in the first place. Obama reinstated propaganda to be used on American citizens once again in 2013. The task to slander and attempt to destroy and imprison Trump through multiple operations and media campaigns were in full effect for the deep state to regain control of The White House. The group that these campaigns affected the most were the older groups and the younger groups. The people in the middle basically got to see both worlds play out in their lives at a crucial time period in their lives. They've seen the mainstream shift from what it once was, to an extreme lying, propaganda machine when Trump took office. The older aged crowd was so used to the regular nightly news and not as comfortable with newer technology to access alternative media sites and really just stuck with the mainstream's words and kept their faith in the MSM. Now the younger crowd literally grew up with the fully scripted, CIA, propaganda MSM because that is literally all they've ever known and haven't experienced anything else before or have anything to compare it to. Especially when your indoctrinated in a public school system that has been infiltrated itself with a majority of far-left teachers who usually end up being predators as well. That's a whole other story. The problem this CIA operation has caused was a population with people all in their own separate groups and boxes, fighting with each other over many things, instead of the people who started this mess in the first place, that aren't even true because one side has been lied to and manipulated. Brainwashed from a literal military style operation that's used to topple foreign countries during regime changes. And the worst part on top of all this is that know since Elon has started DOGE, a government efficiency operation, we are now uncovering that all these communist, Marxist, ideas, and operations and slander campaigns, and legal cases against Trump, down to these politicians luxurious lifestyles have been all funded and paid for by us, the TAXPAYERS. On the one example above, through USAID, there is proof of over $9 MILLION dollars that went to Reuters for a campaign named, " ACTIVE SOCIAL ENGINEERING DEFENSE LARGE SCALE SOCIAL DECEPTION," which is a definitive contract. There are thousands of examples just like this for all different companies, influencers, T.V. shows, Magazines, Articles, any type of media, and all of them are left leaning outlets. This has been going on for decades. Then on top off all of that, you have people who own these publishing and media companies who are not only getting paid by the taxpayers from the CIA to deceive us, but many of these owners are best friends with people like Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxell as you can also see above who is with Laurene Powell Jobs, the owner of "The Atlantic" publication, on vacation just hanging out. You wonder why the media never talks about child trafficking. Their paid to cover it up, or they're literally involved themselves... It just get's better and better. The good news is that it is now being exposed and shut down. Let's dive into the history of PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD now. The story of Project Mockingbird begins in the shadow of the Cold War, a period defined by ideological warfare between the United States and the Soviet Union. In the early 1960s, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), under the leadership of Director John McCone, launched a covert operation codenamed "Project Mockingbird." Unlike the broader, alleged "Operation Mockingbird" often cited in conspiracy circles as a sprawling media manipulation scheme, the historical Project Mockingbird was a specific, documented wiretapping effort aimed at curbing leaks of classified information. Initiated on March 12, 1963, and concluding on June 15, 1963, Project Mockingbird targeted two Washington-based journalists, Robert S. Allen and Paul J. Scott, who wrote the syndicated "Allen-Scott Report." These columnists had a knack for publishing articles laced with highly classified CIA details—information so sensitive it included Top Secret and Special Intelligence data. Their scoops, often sourced from government insiders, rattled the Kennedy administration, particularly after a July 26, 1962, New York Times article by Hanson Baldwin exposed details of a National Intelligence Estimate comparing U.S. and Soviet nuclear arsenals. President John F. Kennedy, incensed by such leaks, sought to plug the holes. The operation was a collaborative effort, greenlit by Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Joseph Carroll. The CIA’s Office of Security, led by Sheffield Edwards, executed the wiretapping, monitoring the journalists’ home and office phones. The surveillance results identified congressional sources, including then-Speaker of the House John McCormack, who spoke with Scott on March 26, 1963. The "Family Jewels"—a 1973 CIA document declassified in 2007—later exposed this operation, revealing its scope and raising questions about its legality. Daniel L. Pines, a CIA Assistant General Counsel, argued in a 2009 Indiana Law Journal review that the wiretapping likely violated legal bounds, as its primary aim was to trace leaks rather than gather foreign intelligence. This historical Project Mockingbird, though limited in duration and scope, planted a seed of distrust between the government, the press, and the public—a seed that would grow into a broader narrative of media manipulation. From Wiretaps to Media Empire While Project Mockingbird of 1963 was a discrete surveillance effort, it became conflated with a larger CIA program dubbed "Operation Mockingbird." This narrative emerged most prominently in Deborah Davis’s 1979 book, Katharine the Great, which claimed that the CIA, under Frank Wisner of the Office of Policy Coordination, had systematically infiltrated American media starting in the 1950s. Davis alleged that Wisner recruited Washington Post publisher Phil Graham to orchestrate a propaganda network, embedding CIA-friendly journalists in outlets like The New York Times, Newsweek, and CBS. Cord Meyer, a key CIA figure, was said to have taken the reins in 1951, expanding the operation’s reach. The Church Committee’s 1975-1976 investigation lent some credence to these claims, uncovering CIA ties to around 50 American journalists and covert funding of front groups like the National Student Association, exposed by Ramparts magazine in 1967. Carl Bernstein’s 1977 Rolling Stone article, "The CIA and the Media," further detailed how over 400 U.S. journalists had covertly worked with the CIA, often disseminating propaganda abroad that would then filter back to domestic audiences. the CIA admitted overreach. By 1976, under Director George H.W. Bush, the CIA publicly pledged to end paid relationships with U.S. journalists. Yet, skeptics argued the agency merely shifted tactics, maintaining influence through foreign media outlets that indirectly shaped American narratives. The line between historical fact and conspiracy theory blurred, setting the stage for modern reinterpretations of Mockingbird’s legacy. They claim. The Turning Point came in 2013 and the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act Fast forward to July 2, 2013, a date that marks a pivotal shift in the Mockingbird saga. Under President Barack Obama, the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act—embedded in the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)—took effect. This legislation amended the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, commonly known as the Smith-Mundt Act, which had long barred government-funded broadcasters like Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty—overseen by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (now the U.S. Agency for Global Media, USAGM)—from disseminating their content domestically. The original intent was to prevent the U.S. government from propagandizing its own citizens, a safeguard rooted in post-World War II fears of authoritarian overreach. The 2013 amendment, co-sponsored by Representatives Adam Smith (D-WA) and Mac Thornberry (R-TX), lifted this restriction, allowing USAGM content to be requested and accessed by Americans. Proponents hailed it as a transparency win, arguing that taxpayers deserved to see what their dollars funded—news and programming in 61 languages, reaching over 100 countries. Critics, however, saw it as a Pandora’s box. Foreign Policy reported on July 14, 2013, that the change unleashed "thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption," raising fears of legalized propaganda. The timing was notable: it followed a decade of post-9/11 media scrutiny and preceded a surge in misinformation debates. in 2024 claimed "Operation Mockingbird never ended," tying the NDAA to a supposed CIA media takeover. No hard evidence supports a direct CIA role, but the legal shift undeniably blurred lines between foreign and domestic information flows. While the USAGM insists its mission remains outward-facing—delivering uncensored news to foreign audiences lacking free press—and that its journalists adhere to strict objectivity standards, the repeal stoked speculation. Could this be a modern resurrection of Mockingbird-style influence? The answer is yes. Most projects they say they stopped just get renamed or go black and off the books so Congress doesn't even know it exists or get access to it. Be careful what you read, who you follow, and who you get your information from. Look for patterns and scripts. They're easy to find once you understand what's really going on and their tactics and techniques. Keep asking questions, cross reference everything, do your due diligence, have multiple sources, do not buy everything at face value, go deeper, think about the bigger picture or long term goals. And always remember that there are layers, optics, and timing to everything you see. 90% of everything that comes out gets run by the intelligence agencies first. Lastly, keep fighting for the truth and and continue to help others to wake up as well.
8:02

The CIA's information war with American citizens and the operation that started it all. Project Mockingbird. This is one main aspect as to why people are so divided and brainwashed in today's society. Information has always been a crucial component to power and control. Knowledge is power, right? The only difference today from 40+ years ago is that now information flows at a rate that is absolutely mind-boggling and allows you to connect with anyone, at anytime, anywhere in the world, with real-time information 24/7 at your finger tips. So what happens when you have people who are suppose to be giving you accurate, truthful, information, and start to give you information that benefits, manipulates, and persuades the global population with mis and disinformation, protects certain corrupt people and groups by not reporting on other information, and who also lies and slanders other individuals all for the purpose to maintain power and control over the entire population, entirely on PURPOSE? You get what's called PROPAGANDA, aka, a sh*t show of so much purposeful bad and fake information, that it literally starts to persuade and mold the populations overall views and opinions on an array of various topics to fit the nefarious controllers, behind the scenes narrative or agenda. Ultimitely benefitting only them. If you take notice, these campaigns have been around for a long time, depending what side your on, your personal views and where you get your overall information will ultimately decide or be a factor of how much it has affected you or how much you are aware of the deception in the first place. Most legacy mainstream media groups are owned and operated by a small group of wealthy globalist individuals who seem to lean towards the left, and some leaning even farther left than others. These campaigns started to really pick up when Trump entered the picture in 2016. Trump was never suppose to win in the first place. Obama reinstated propaganda to be used on American citizens once again in 2013. The task to slander and attempt to destroy and imprison Trump through multiple operations and media campaigns were in full effect for the deep state to regain control of The White House. The group that these campaigns affected the most were the older groups and the younger groups. The people in the middle basically got to see both worlds play out in their lives at a crucial time period in their lives. They've seen the mainstream shift from what it once was, to an extreme lying, propaganda machine when Trump took office. The older aged crowd was so used to the regular nightly news and not as comfortable with newer technology to access alternative media sites and really just stuck with the mainstream's words and kept their faith in the MSM. Now the younger crowd literally grew up with the fully scripted, CIA, propaganda MSM because that is literally all they've ever known and haven't experienced anything else before or have anything to compare it to. Especially when your indoctrinated in a public school system that has been infiltrated itself with a majority of far-left teachers who usually end up being predators as well. That's a whole other story. The problem this CIA operation has caused was a population with people all in their own separate groups and boxes, fighting with each other over many things, instead of the people who started this mess in the first place, that aren't even true because one side has been lied to and manipulated. Brainwashed from a literal military style operation that's used to topple foreign countries during regime changes. And the worst part on top of all this is that know since Elon has started DOGE, a government efficiency operation, we are now uncovering that all these communist, Marxist, ideas, and operations and slander campaigns, and legal cases against Trump, down to these politicians luxurious lifestyles have been all funded and paid for by us, the TAXPAYERS. On the one example above, through USAID, there is proof of over $9 MILLION dollars that went to Reuters for a campaign named, " ACTIVE SOCIAL ENGINEERING DEFENSE LARGE SCALE SOCIAL DECEPTION," which is a definitive contract. There are thousands of examples just like this for all different companies, influencers, T.V. shows, Magazines, Articles, any type of media, and all of them are left leaning outlets. This has been going on for decades. Then on top off all of that, you have people who own these publishing and media companies who are not only getting paid by the taxpayers from the CIA to deceive us, but many of these owners are best friends with people like Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxell as you can also see above who is with Laurene Powell Jobs, the owner of "The Atlantic" publication, on vacation just hanging out. You wonder why the media never talks about child trafficking. Their paid to cover it up, or they're literally involved themselves... It just get's better and better. The good news is that it is now being exposed and shut down. Let's dive into the history of PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD now. The story of Project Mockingbird begins in the shadow of the Cold War, a period defined by ideological warfare between the United States and the Soviet Union. In the early 1960s, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), under the leadership of Director John McCone, launched a covert operation codenamed "Project Mockingbird." Unlike the broader, alleged "Operation Mockingbird" often cited in conspiracy circles as a sprawling media manipulation scheme, the historical Project Mockingbird was a specific, documented wiretapping effort aimed at curbing leaks of classified information. Initiated on March 12, 1963, and concluding on June 15, 1963, Project Mockingbird targeted two Washington-based journalists, Robert S. Allen and Paul J. Scott, who wrote the syndicated "Allen-Scott Report." These columnists had a knack for publishing articles laced with highly classified CIA details—information so sensitive it included Top Secret and Special Intelligence data. Their scoops, often sourced from government insiders, rattled the Kennedy administration, particularly after a July 26, 1962, New York Times article by Hanson Baldwin exposed details of a National Intelligence Estimate comparing U.S. and Soviet nuclear arsenals. President John F. Kennedy, incensed by such leaks, sought to plug the holes. The operation was a collaborative effort, greenlit by Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Joseph Carroll. The CIA’s Office of Security, led by Sheffield Edwards, executed the wiretapping, monitoring the journalists’ home and office phones. The surveillance results identified congressional sources, including then-Speaker of the House John McCormack, who spoke with Scott on March 26, 1963. The "Family Jewels"—a 1973 CIA document declassified in 2007—later exposed this operation, revealing its scope and raising questions about its legality. Daniel L. Pines, a CIA Assistant General Counsel, argued in a 2009 Indiana Law Journal review that the wiretapping likely violated legal bounds, as its primary aim was to trace leaks rather than gather foreign intelligence. This historical Project Mockingbird, though limited in duration and scope, planted a seed of distrust between the government, the press, and the public—a seed that would grow into a broader narrative of media manipulation. From Wiretaps to Media Empire While Project Mockingbird of 1963 was a discrete surveillance effort, it became conflated with a larger CIA program dubbed "Operation Mockingbird." This narrative emerged most prominently in Deborah Davis’s 1979 book, Katharine the Great, which claimed that the CIA, under Frank Wisner of the Office of Policy Coordination, had systematically infiltrated American media starting in the 1950s. Davis alleged that Wisner recruited Washington Post publisher Phil Graham to orchestrate a propaganda network, embedding CIA-friendly journalists in outlets like The New York Times, Newsweek, and CBS. Cord Meyer, a key CIA figure, was said to have taken the reins in 1951, expanding the operation’s reach. The Church Committee’s 1975-1976 investigation lent some credence to these claims, uncovering CIA ties to around 50 American journalists and covert funding of front groups like the National Student Association, exposed by Ramparts magazine in 1967. Carl Bernstein’s 1977 Rolling Stone article, "The CIA and the Media," further detailed how over 400 U.S. journalists had covertly worked with the CIA, often disseminating propaganda abroad that would then filter back to domestic audiences. the CIA admitted overreach. By 1976, under Director George H.W. Bush, the CIA publicly pledged to end paid relationships with U.S. journalists. Yet, skeptics argued the agency merely shifted tactics, maintaining influence through foreign media outlets that indirectly shaped American narratives. The line between historical fact and conspiracy theory blurred, setting the stage for modern reinterpretations of Mockingbird’s legacy. They claim. The Turning Point came in 2013 and the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act Fast forward to July 2, 2013, a date that marks a pivotal shift in the Mockingbird saga. Under President Barack Obama, the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act—embedded in the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)—took effect. This legislation amended the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, commonly known as the Smith-Mundt Act, which had long barred government-funded broadcasters like Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty—overseen by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (now the U.S. Agency for Global Media, USAGM)—from disseminating their content domestically. The original intent was to prevent the U.S. government from propagandizing its own citizens, a safeguard rooted in post-World War II fears of authoritarian overreach. The 2013 amendment, co-sponsored by Representatives Adam Smith (D-WA) and Mac Thornberry (R-TX), lifted this restriction, allowing USAGM content to be requested and accessed by Americans. Proponents hailed it as a transparency win, arguing that taxpayers deserved to see what their dollars funded—news and programming in 61 languages, reaching over 100 countries. Critics, however, saw it as a Pandora’s box. Foreign Policy reported on July 14, 2013, that the change unleashed "thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption," raising fears of legalized propaganda. The timing was notable: it followed a decade of post-9/11 media scrutiny and preceded a surge in misinformation debates. in 2024 claimed "Operation Mockingbird never ended," tying the NDAA to a supposed CIA media takeover. No hard evidence supports a direct CIA role, but the legal shift undeniably blurred lines between foreign and domestic information flows. While the USAGM insists its mission remains outward-facing—delivering uncensored news to foreign audiences lacking free press—and that its journalists adhere to strict objectivity standards, the repeal stoked speculation. Could this be a modern resurrection of Mockingbird-style influence? The answer is yes. Most projects they say they stopped just get renamed or go black and off the books so Congress doesn't even know it exists or get access to it. Be careful what you read, who you follow, and who you get your information from. Look for patterns and scripts. They're easy to find once you understand what's really going on and their tactics and techniques. Keep asking questions, cross reference everything, do your due diligence, have multiple sources, do not buy everything at face value, go deeper, think about the bigger picture or long term goals. And always remember that there are layers, optics, and timing to everything you see. 90% of everything that comes out gets run by the intelligence agencies first. Lastly, keep fighting for the truth and and continue to help others to wake up as well.

The SCIF

85,170 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮
29:17

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮

aussie17

799,563 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#PahlaviTerrorists #فرقه_تروریستی_پهلوی Open Letter to the Honourable Pierre Poilievre December 26, 2025 OPEN LETTER: Reza Pahlavi’s network shut down your Vancouver event on February 9, 2024 cc: Chief Constable Steve Rai Vancouver Police Andrew Scheer CSIS Canada Stephen Harper Melissa Lantsman The Vancouver Sun Rebel News Canada CanAm Network Dear Mr. Poilievre, Records I recently obtained through a series of orders of the Supreme Court of British Columbia(the most recent granted on December 15, 2025) objectively establish that your Vancouver Persian community meet-and-greet on February 9, 2024 was shut down by Reza Pahlavi’s networks. I am writing this publicly because this represents a new level of atrocity by these networks. They are already notorious for coordinated attacks on Iranian pro-democracy activists, which is why they are before the Supreme Court of BC and why Reza Pahlavi faced two conclusive judgments against him on October 16, 2025. But shutting down the public event of a national political leader on the verge of elections in Canada is an escalation into direct interference with Canadian democratic life. When a Canadian federal political leader like you can be forced out of a venue through intimidation—particularly if the same actors can penetrate political communities through relationship-based access while coordinating venue tracking, harassment, and intimidation with a designated terrorist entity and against the same communities—then Canada has a sovereignty and public-safety problem, which goes beyond any partisan boundaries. On February 9, 2024, Reza Pahlavi’s networks acted through premeditated political intimidation orchestrated on the ground by two individuals: Arezou Soltani of North Vancouver and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh of Maple Ridge, who jointly led a local Pahlavi-affiliated group registered in British Columbia as Canadian Iranian Wakuppers Foundation (the “Wakuppers”). Those disclosed records from the Wakuppers’ WhatsApp group chat show: · real-time tracking of your appearance, · active efforts to locate the venue while you were speaking, · celebratory messaging after the shutdown, and · Mehdi Ahmadzadeh’s own voice message, in which he vividly describes and boasts about assaults, pushing, intimidation and dragging the attendees “into dust and blood”. You remember that night. Barely seconds after you began your remarks at: True Confections Denman, 866 Denman St, Vancouver, BC V6G 2L9, the disruption started by Hamas supporters and the scene changed instantly. The event had been anticipated as roughly a 90-minute meet-and-greet. Instead, you were forced to cut your entire remarks down to roughly 15 minutes and escorted out by your security team early. You also tried to defuse the disruption and offered a fair compromise—words to the effect of: “Let me give my remarks, and during Q&A you can ask your questions.” They refused. You then called it out on the spot—“It seems we have the Iranian regime here,” and referred to them as “IRGC supporters.” You were right, but that was not the full reality. What happened that night was not just “IRGC people showed up.” It was a coordinated operation involving collaboration between IRGC-aligned Hamas supporters on the ground and a local Pahlavi network behind the scenes, with Soltani and Ahmadzadeh operating as the on-the-ground masterminds. What you did not know prior to reading this letter—and what I only fully understood lately, following the Court-ordered disclosures—is that the shutdown was indeed orchestrated by the Pahlavi networks. Here is the blunt truth: Out of expressed hostility, they handed the location to Hamas supporters, who then arrived and executed the shutdown. They were the visible shock-troops on the ground; the venue-locating and mobilization came from the Wakuppers led by the Pahlavi operatives, Soltani and Ahmadzadeh. With all that said: · It is striking that Reza Pahlavi had previously tried to portray himself publicly as a proponent of your political rise and access to the Iranian community, and that he met with you in or about March 2023. Yet the evidence now shows that local circles aligned with him were behind the disruption and shutdown of your February 9, 2024 event. · It is also striking that the same local circle, namely, the Wakuppers, includes Mary Hakimi, the partner of Doug Horne, a former Conservative MLA—an obvious access channel into Conservative circles. Through court-ordered production, I have also obtained a photograph showing Arezou Soltani and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh in close proximity to you. I am informed they obtained backstage access to you through the Mary Hakimi / Doug Horne connection. Another matter you may not be aware of is that these same circles use MEK-labelling exactly the way the Islamic Republic does: as a weapon to intimidate, discredit, and socially isolate Iranian pro-democracy activists—and, when convenient, to smear Conservative politicians and MPs as well. To that point, the Wakuppers’ group chat content I obtained includes foul and contemptuous language directed at the Conservative Party of Canada and at senior Conservative figures, such as the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, including condemning the shutting down of the Islamic Republic’s embassyand advancing pro-IRGC narratives, in the guise of the same MEK-labelling described above. Representative portions are included as appendices by way of certified translation. I should say that all these records and relevant orders were obtained despite persistent efforts by Soltani and Ahmadzadeh—and their counsel, Nojan Kamoosi—to obstruct accountability and distort the process through false and misleading sworn materials. In my proceedings, I have had to confront multiple affidavits that were perjured and specifically designed by Nojan Kamoosi and his law firm to derail proper adjudication, prevent disclosure, and mislead the Court. I assume your office will treat this new disclosure about the February 9, 2024 shutdown as a serious public-order and democratic-integrity concern, and will coordinate with the Vancouver Police Department (and any other appropriate agencies) to ensure that the relevant records are secured and reviewed. I also formally request that your office take immediate steps to ensure the preservation of all relevant records relating to the February 9, 2024 shutdown, for the purpose of ongoing litigation, Action S-246401, against Reza Pahlavi and his network (including co-defendants Soltani and Ahmadzadeh, among others), which addresses their engagement in political violence and intimidation in Canada. This preservation request includes, without limitation: · security incident notes and internal reports; · communications with organizers and any third-party intermediaries about the incident; and · access logs and records relating to who facilitated Soltani’s and Ahmadzadeh’s backstage access to you on Feb 9, 2024; to the extent such records are within your control or can be preserved through timely requests to the relevant custodians. For ease of review, I will provide the following appendices with this open letter: Appendix A: Certified translations of relevant WhatsApp text messages involving Mary Hakimi (Doug Horne’s partner), Arezou Soltani, and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh (including venue-locating and celebratory messaging), dated Feb 9-10, 2024. Appendix B: Link to Mehdi Ahmadzadeh’s voice message of Feb 10, 2024 (as produced). Appendix C: Certified translation of Ahmadzadeh’s voice message of Feb 10, 2024. Appendix D: Photograph showing Arezou Soltani and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh in close proximity to the Honourable Pierre Poilievre (presumably taken on Feb 9, 2025). Appendix E: Photograph of Reza Pahlavi with the Honourables Pierre Poilievre and Melissa Lantsman (presumably taken in March 2023). Appendix F: Vancouver lawyer, Nojan Kamoosi of Allen / McMillan Litigation Counsel; Counsel for Soltani Appendix G: Representative certified translations showing foul language and hostile messaging directed at the Conservative Party and Conservative figures, including discussions condemning the shutting down of the Islamic Republic’s embassy. Appendix H: Affidavit #18 of Masood Masjoody in Action S-246401, Masjoody v. Pahlavi, et al., filed December 12, 2025 A copy of this letter is being provided to the Vancouver Police Department. Respectfully, Masood Masjoody, Ph.D. President and Founder of UNHRC Dossier Burnaby, British Columbia #جاوید_ایران
1:02

#PahlaviTerrorists #فرقه_تروریستی_پهلوی Open Letter to the Honourable Pierre Poilievre December 26, 2025 OPEN LETTER: Reza Pahlavi’s network shut down your Vancouver event on February 9, 2024 cc: Chief Constable Steve Rai Vancouver Police Andrew Scheer CSIS Canada Stephen Harper Melissa Lantsman The Vancouver Sun Rebel News Canada CanAm Network Dear Mr. Poilievre, Records I recently obtained through a series of orders of the Supreme Court of British Columbia(the most recent granted on December 15, 2025) objectively establish that your Vancouver Persian community meet-and-greet on February 9, 2024 was shut down by Reza Pahlavi’s networks. I am writing this publicly because this represents a new level of atrocity by these networks. They are already notorious for coordinated attacks on Iranian pro-democracy activists, which is why they are before the Supreme Court of BC and why Reza Pahlavi faced two conclusive judgments against him on October 16, 2025. But shutting down the public event of a national political leader on the verge of elections in Canada is an escalation into direct interference with Canadian democratic life. When a Canadian federal political leader like you can be forced out of a venue through intimidation—particularly if the same actors can penetrate political communities through relationship-based access while coordinating venue tracking, harassment, and intimidation with a designated terrorist entity and against the same communities—then Canada has a sovereignty and public-safety problem, which goes beyond any partisan boundaries. On February 9, 2024, Reza Pahlavi’s networks acted through premeditated political intimidation orchestrated on the ground by two individuals: Arezou Soltani of North Vancouver and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh of Maple Ridge, who jointly led a local Pahlavi-affiliated group registered in British Columbia as Canadian Iranian Wakuppers Foundation (the “Wakuppers”). Those disclosed records from the Wakuppers’ WhatsApp group chat show: · real-time tracking of your appearance, · active efforts to locate the venue while you were speaking, · celebratory messaging after the shutdown, and · Mehdi Ahmadzadeh’s own voice message, in which he vividly describes and boasts about assaults, pushing, intimidation and dragging the attendees “into dust and blood”. You remember that night. Barely seconds after you began your remarks at: True Confections Denman, 866 Denman St, Vancouver, BC V6G 2L9, the disruption started by Hamas supporters and the scene changed instantly. The event had been anticipated as roughly a 90-minute meet-and-greet. Instead, you were forced to cut your entire remarks down to roughly 15 minutes and escorted out by your security team early. You also tried to defuse the disruption and offered a fair compromise—words to the effect of: “Let me give my remarks, and during Q&A you can ask your questions.” They refused. You then called it out on the spot—“It seems we have the Iranian regime here,” and referred to them as “IRGC supporters.” You were right, but that was not the full reality. What happened that night was not just “IRGC people showed up.” It was a coordinated operation involving collaboration between IRGC-aligned Hamas supporters on the ground and a local Pahlavi network behind the scenes, with Soltani and Ahmadzadeh operating as the on-the-ground masterminds. What you did not know prior to reading this letter—and what I only fully understood lately, following the Court-ordered disclosures—is that the shutdown was indeed orchestrated by the Pahlavi networks. Here is the blunt truth: Out of expressed hostility, they handed the location to Hamas supporters, who then arrived and executed the shutdown. They were the visible shock-troops on the ground; the venue-locating and mobilization came from the Wakuppers led by the Pahlavi operatives, Soltani and Ahmadzadeh. With all that said: · It is striking that Reza Pahlavi had previously tried to portray himself publicly as a proponent of your political rise and access to the Iranian community, and that he met with you in or about March 2023. Yet the evidence now shows that local circles aligned with him were behind the disruption and shutdown of your February 9, 2024 event. · It is also striking that the same local circle, namely, the Wakuppers, includes Mary Hakimi, the partner of Doug Horne, a former Conservative MLA—an obvious access channel into Conservative circles. Through court-ordered production, I have also obtained a photograph showing Arezou Soltani and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh in close proximity to you. I am informed they obtained backstage access to you through the Mary Hakimi / Doug Horne connection. Another matter you may not be aware of is that these same circles use MEK-labelling exactly the way the Islamic Republic does: as a weapon to intimidate, discredit, and socially isolate Iranian pro-democracy activists—and, when convenient, to smear Conservative politicians and MPs as well. To that point, the Wakuppers’ group chat content I obtained includes foul and contemptuous language directed at the Conservative Party of Canada and at senior Conservative figures, such as the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, including condemning the shutting down of the Islamic Republic’s embassyand advancing pro-IRGC narratives, in the guise of the same MEK-labelling described above. Representative portions are included as appendices by way of certified translation. I should say that all these records and relevant orders were obtained despite persistent efforts by Soltani and Ahmadzadeh—and their counsel, Nojan Kamoosi—to obstruct accountability and distort the process through false and misleading sworn materials. In my proceedings, I have had to confront multiple affidavits that were perjured and specifically designed by Nojan Kamoosi and his law firm to derail proper adjudication, prevent disclosure, and mislead the Court. I assume your office will treat this new disclosure about the February 9, 2024 shutdown as a serious public-order and democratic-integrity concern, and will coordinate with the Vancouver Police Department (and any other appropriate agencies) to ensure that the relevant records are secured and reviewed. I also formally request that your office take immediate steps to ensure the preservation of all relevant records relating to the February 9, 2024 shutdown, for the purpose of ongoing litigation, Action S-246401, against Reza Pahlavi and his network (including co-defendants Soltani and Ahmadzadeh, among others), which addresses their engagement in political violence and intimidation in Canada. This preservation request includes, without limitation: · security incident notes and internal reports; · communications with organizers and any third-party intermediaries about the incident; and · access logs and records relating to who facilitated Soltani’s and Ahmadzadeh’s backstage access to you on Feb 9, 2024; to the extent such records are within your control or can be preserved through timely requests to the relevant custodians. For ease of review, I will provide the following appendices with this open letter: Appendix A: Certified translations of relevant WhatsApp text messages involving Mary Hakimi (Doug Horne’s partner), Arezou Soltani, and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh (including venue-locating and celebratory messaging), dated Feb 9-10, 2024. Appendix B: Link to Mehdi Ahmadzadeh’s voice message of Feb 10, 2024 (as produced). Appendix C: Certified translation of Ahmadzadeh’s voice message of Feb 10, 2024. Appendix D: Photograph showing Arezou Soltani and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh in close proximity to the Honourable Pierre Poilievre (presumably taken on Feb 9, 2025). Appendix E: Photograph of Reza Pahlavi with the Honourables Pierre Poilievre and Melissa Lantsman (presumably taken in March 2023). Appendix F: Vancouver lawyer, Nojan Kamoosi of Allen / McMillan Litigation Counsel; Counsel for Soltani Appendix G: Representative certified translations showing foul language and hostile messaging directed at the Conservative Party and Conservative figures, including discussions condemning the shutting down of the Islamic Republic’s embassy. Appendix H: Affidavit #18 of Masood Masjoody in Action S-246401, Masjoody v. Pahlavi, et al., filed December 12, 2025 A copy of this letter is being provided to the Vancouver Police Department. Respectfully, Masood Masjoody, Ph.D. President and Founder of UNHRC Dossier Burnaby, British Columbia #جاوید_ایران

Masood Masjoody | مسعود مسجودی

43,127 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten