Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
FED UP with the common misconception that tail risk hedging means bearishness. First order effect ≠ Higher order effects. Good job Brandon.
86,683 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
10 Yorum

The only people who believe this are your enemies. They spread the lies

it's like asking someone if they think their house will burn down because they have homeowner's coverage

on a tangent: buy (insurance) when you don't need to buy so that you don't have to buy when you need to buy

What does a proper tail hedge look like? - Is it having enough cash to survive and reinvest when other's can't? - Buying puts when Vol is low? Rather out of the money? - Focus on resilient stocks? low debt etc. Happy to see ideas, because mine don't fully convince me

tail risk hedging allows one to be aggressively long, as in being 99% long.

Okay but how do I actually implement this+72/-50 -> +70/-20 portfolio. Just keep cash? What were the best investment types of 1929

"we are much closer to 1929" 🤡🤡

I shorted SMH at 150. THAT's tail risk. Got my ass handed to me! haha.

Tail risk means relations breaking down. Not just a bigger move than normal. Unexpected unexpectedness in abnormal ways.

Good job too. Oh i saw him in your youtube channel who introducing "Ber-noo-yi" program. 베르누이
