正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

FED UP with the common misconception that tail risk hedging means bearishness. First order effect ≠ Higher order effects. Good job Brandon.

86,734 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

James Marsh 的头像
James Marsh1 年前

The only people who believe this are your enemies. They spread the lies

factual bill 的头像
factual bill1 年前

it's like asking someone if they think their house will burn down because they have homeowner's coverage

Marco Alves 的头像
Marco Alves1 年前

on a tangent: buy (insurance) when you don't need to buy so that you don't have to buy when you need to buy

CraftY 的头像
CraftY1 年前

What does a proper tail hedge look like? - Is it having enough cash to survive and reinvest when other's can't? - Buying puts when Vol is low? Rather out of the money? - Focus on resilient stocks? low debt etc. Happy to see ideas, because mine don't fully convince me

Jamil Hreich 的头像
Jamil Hreich1 年前

tail risk hedging allows one to be aggressively long, as in being 99% long.

Cole Dieckhaus 的头像
Cole Dieckhaus1 年前

Okay but how do I actually implement this+72/-50 -> +70/-20 portfolio. Just keep cash? What were the best investment types of 1929

ysl_mak 的头像
ysl_mak1 年前

"we are much closer to 1929" 🤡🤡

Landon Fillmore Systems 的头像
Landon Fillmore Systems1 年前

I shorted SMH at 150. THAT's tail risk. Got my ass handed to me! haha.

Thomas van der Vliet 的头像
Thomas van der Vliet1 年前

Tail risk means relations breaking down. Not just a bigger move than normal. Unexpected unexpectedness in abnormal ways.

Sol 的头像
Sol1 年前

Good job too. Oh i saw him in your youtube channel who introducing "Ber-noo-yi" program. 베르누이

相关视频