正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Federal Prosecutors think that the United States Constitution does not apply to Andrew and Tristan Tate's Conditions of Confinement.

Joe McBride

187,801 subscribers

11,798 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

LFG! 的头像

LFG!11 天前

Why are the Tate brothers treated like criminals while the real criminals are the ones prosecuting them for nothing? This is an upside-down case. Free the Tate brothers immediately!

Amiri King 的头像

Amiri King11 天前

This is such a shit look for the White House and the Trump admin as a whole. Wtf are we even doing here.

Tate Update Desk 的头像

Tate Update Desk11 天前

Clear point from McBride: confinement conditions aren't a side issue. This is the fight. Lawyer of record putting it on the record for both brothers, who continue to deny all charges with nothing proven at trial.

Milan Dundovic 的头像

Milan Dundovic11 天前

It actually doesn’t make sense why they are in solitary

agentphilip07 的头像

agentphilip0710 天前

Free the Tates!

The Real Chad 的头像

The Real Chad11 天前

They are innocent men held in a prison cell for being real men who speak up against elit powers who use their own language to twist narratives. It’s over UK 🇬🇧 your country sucks I will never understand why you think they are bad when you’re immigrants kill and rape daily . It stems from the crown , the standard you walk past is the standard you accept. Former prince Andrew needs to see a cell wall before you cuck up and talk shit🫵

Tate Update Desk 的头像

Tate Update Desk11 天前

Counsel putting conditions on the record. That's the job.

Steven C Nielson 的头像

Steven C Nielson11 天前

Yep

Robert Padgett 的头像

Robert Padgett11 天前

Lopez should be placed in solitary confinement until she agrees to release Andrew and Tristan on bail.

相关视频

Lawyers for Andrew and Tristan Tate have argued for their release from a Miami jail on the grounds of harsh conditions at the facility. Prosecutors said that while FDC Miami is ‘not a Marriott,’ the Tates’ conditions of confinement are ‘reasonable’

Lawyers for Andrew and Tristan Tate have argued for their release from a Miami jail on the grounds of harsh conditions at the facility. Prosecutors said that while FDC Miami is ‘not a Marriott,’ the Tates’ conditions of confinement are ‘reasonable’

Reuters

239,581 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Constitution gives the states the authority to set the time, place and manner of federal elections. “It does not give the president of the United States any authority,” Marc E. Elias says.

The Constitution gives the states the authority to set the time, place and manner of federal elections. “It does not give the president of the United States any authority,” Marc E. Elias says.

Democracy Docket

20,555 次观看 • 1 个月前

Let’s be clear, the United States Constitution does not allow for the deportation of United States citizens based solely on the conviction of a crime.

Let’s be clear, the United States Constitution does not allow for the deportation of United States citizens based solely on the conviction of a crime.

Gerald A. Griggs

63,789 次观看 • 1 年前

🔴Andrew And Tristan Tate's Lawyer Exposes The Truth🔴

🔴Andrew And Tristan Tate's Lawyer Exposes The Truth🔴

Fresh&Fit

48,045 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES—AND SO DOES THE CONSTITUTION. Jonathan Turley: "The Constitution... gives the executive branch to the president of the United States to run."

🚨 ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES—AND SO DOES THE CONSTITUTION. Jonathan Turley: "The Constitution... gives the executive branch to the president of the United States to run."

Laura Ingraham

71,242 次观看 • 2 个月前

TULSI GABBARD: “How can we trust a person to uphold her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the First Amendment? How we can trust a person to upload her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the Second Amendment and our right to protect our loved ones?” Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

TULSI GABBARD: “How can we trust a person to uphold her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the First Amendment? How we can trust a person to upload her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States who does not believe in the Second Amendment and our right to protect our loved ones?” Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

Charlie Kirk

1,823,657 次观看 • 1 年前

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “…how much control of elections does the constitution grant to the president of the United States? Rep Raskin: “ZERO… the constitution vests that power in the states, and then there’s complimentary or supplementary power in Congress to alter the time, place and manner of elections under certain conditions, but neither the states nor Congress gave any power to the president to do it, so the federal court has properly ruled this was nothing but an outrageous POWER GRAB by the president, and he’s got to stay in his lane. His job is to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not rewritten and thwarted.” 😳

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “…how much control of elections does the constitution grant to the president of the United States? Rep Raskin: “ZERO… the constitution vests that power in the states, and then there’s complimentary or supplementary power in Congress to alter the time, place and manner of elections under certain conditions, but neither the states nor Congress gave any power to the president to do it, so the federal court has properly ruled this was nothing but an outrageous POWER GRAB by the president, and he’s got to stay in his lane. His job is to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not rewritten and thwarted.” 😳

Emoluments Clause

22,596 次观看 • 2 个月前

🤬Andrew & Tristan Tate's cousin Luc is ANGRY AND WON'T CALM DOWN! Why?🫣 Luc: "THIS is stupid!" Tristan"You're not going to talk to me for the rest of my life.... because of a joke?"

🤬Andrew & Tristan Tate's cousin Luc is ANGRY AND WON'T CALM DOWN! Why?🫣 Luc: "THIS is stupid!" Tristan"You're not going to talk to me for the rest of my life.... because of a joke?"

Chris

172,290 次观看 • 2 个月前

I think President Donald J. Trump's view on "birthright" citizenship is consistent with the Constitution, federal law, legal precedent, and history: The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Consistent with this understanding, the Congress has further specified through legislation that “a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is a national and citizen of the United States at birth, 8 U.S.C. 1401, generally mirroring the Fourteenth Amendment’s text. Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

I think President Donald J. Trump's view on "birthright" citizenship is consistent with the Constitution, federal law, legal precedent, and history: The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Consistent with this understanding, the Congress has further specified through legislation that “a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is a national and citizen of the United States at birth, 8 U.S.C. 1401, generally mirroring the Fourteenth Amendment’s text. Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

Tom Fitton

106,784 次观看 • 5 个月前

Q: Do you think there should be conditions on the aid the United States sends to Israel? Haley Stevens: "Absolutely not. I'm not for conditions,"

Q: Do you think there should be conditions on the aid the United States sends to Israel? Haley Stevens: "Absolutely not. I'm not for conditions,"

AIPAC Tracker

343,820 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Andrew Tate's lawyer has an unhinged meltdown, screaming at President Trump that he should NOT allow the Tates to be extradited He says Andrew and Tristan are "two warriors and two generals," and "You don't betray your generals! You don't betray your warriors!" A reminder that the UK is seeking extradition of Andrew and Tristan Tate for charges including rape, human trafficking and child porn... not anything to do with speech.

🚨 Andrew Tate's lawyer has an unhinged meltdown, screaming at President Trump that he should NOT allow the Tates to be extradited He says Andrew and Tristan are "two warriors and two generals," and "You don't betray your generals! You don't betray your warriors!" A reminder that the UK is seeking extradition of Andrew and Tristan Tate for charges including rape, human trafficking and child porn... not anything to do with speech.

Gadget

51,341 次观看 • 1 个月前

Vice President Harris on Donald Trump: "He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him."

Vice President Harris on Donald Trump: "He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him."

CSPAN

921,915 次观看 • 1 年前

VANCE: "The President of the United States has to anchor everything that he does to the national interest of the country. And I think unfortunately if we're being honest, some politicians pretend that there's never any disagreement between Israel and the United States."

VANCE: "The President of the United States has to anchor everything that he does to the national interest of the country. And I think unfortunately if we're being honest, some politicians pretend that there's never any disagreement between Israel and the United States."

TheBlaze

25,850 次观看 • 1 年前

Former federal judge J. Michael Luttig: “The President of the United States of America is at war with the Constitution and the rule of law.”

Former federal judge J. Michael Luttig: “The President of the United States of America is at war with the Constitution and the rule of law.”

Republicans against Trump

410,791 次观看 • 1 年前

Sen. Bernie Sanders on President Trump's call to nationalize elections: "The idea that anyone would trust for one minute this guy running an honest election would be beyond comprehension. Not to mention that obviously he has not read the Constitution of the United States, which has states running elections, not the federal government."

Sen. Bernie Sanders on President Trump's call to nationalize elections: "The idea that anyone would trust for one minute this guy running an honest election would be beyond comprehension. Not to mention that obviously he has not read the Constitution of the United States, which has states running elections, not the federal government."

Kaitlan Collins

677,068 次观看 • 7 个月前

In Boston, a federal judge on Thursday halted President Trump's executive order that aimed to regulate mail-in voting and create a federal voter list. In her ruling, Judge Indira Talwani sided with nearly two dozen states, finding that “The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections.” Her decision would apply to the November midterms, though the White House plans to appeal.

In Boston, a federal judge on Thursday halted President Trump's executive order that aimed to regulate mail-in voting and create a federal voter list. In her ruling, Judge Indira Talwani sided with nearly two dozen states, finding that “The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections.” Her decision would apply to the November midterms, though the White House plans to appeal.

PBS News

22,688 次观看 • 2 个月前