Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Federico Faggin: "Quantum Fields are conscious & have free will" "You cannot create something that can know itself by something that doesn't even know what knowing means." The inventor of the first commercial microprocessor argues that consciousness cannot emerge from non-conscious matter. No mechanism can explain how awareness arises...

InterstellarUAP's profile picture

Interstellar

134,896 subscribers

32,149 Aufrufe • vor 22 Stunden •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Can AI become conscious? The argument here is that real thinking is not just computation. Understanding, music, love, and awareness may involve something deeper than what a computer can run. The key point is quantum mechanics. Most physics can be turned into algorithms, but the measurement problem still leaves a gap: something happens that our equations do not fully explain. That is where consciousness may live, in a part of reality that cannot simply be coded. If that is true, AI may get smarter, faster, and more convincing, but still miss the one thing that makes understanding human. Source: YourWeeklyCrew (Youtube) / Writer: Sol
2:40

Can AI become conscious? The argument here is that real thinking is not just computation. Understanding, music, love, and awareness may involve something deeper than what a computer can run. The key point is quantum mechanics. Most physics can be turned into algorithms, but the measurement problem still leaves a gap: something happens that our equations do not fully explain. That is where consciousness may live, in a part of reality that cannot simply be coded. If that is true, AI may get smarter, faster, and more convincing, but still miss the one thing that makes understanding human. Source: YourWeeklyCrew (Youtube) / Writer: Sol

Mario Nawfal

21,114 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Physicist Federico Faggin reveals his groundbreaking theory of consciousness: "We are going to be taken over by artificial intelligence" "Every single one of us is a field that is both the observer, the observed, and the actor. This field does not exist in space and time. Space time exists within these fields that we are." The inventor of the microprocessor explains that we are part wholes connected to the totality of existence. This is why epigenetics works - Each part accesses the knowledge of the whole. The same pattern repeats across scales. This changes everything about how we understand reality, free will, and our place in the universe.
1:46

Physicist Federico Faggin reveals his groundbreaking theory of consciousness: "We are going to be taken over by artificial intelligence" "Every single one of us is a field that is both the observer, the observed, and the actor. This field does not exist in space and time. Space time exists within these fields that we are." The inventor of the microprocessor explains that we are part wholes connected to the totality of existence. This is why epigenetics works - Each part accesses the knowledge of the whole. The same pattern repeats across scales. This changes everything about how we understand reality, free will, and our place in the universe.

Interstellar

39,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

André Duqum is a wonderful host and guide in this conversation, where we discuss the fundamental nature of reality, quantum and classical physics, self knowing, courage, love, consciousness, free will, and artificial intelligence, among other topics listed in the chapter descriptions below. As André shares from my newest book "Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers, and Human Nature"... "We are eternal, conscious beings rather than perishable bodies, and we are here to learn crucial aspects of ourselves by interacting with each other in the physical universe that we have co created for this very purpose." It is with great hope that viewers of this conversation may find meaning in the ideas discussed, and encouragement to further your own self learning. - Federico Full Video 🌍👁️ Discussion Chapters👇 Intro His Spontaneous Spiritual Awakening Defining Consciousness: Classical vs Quantum View Can computers be Conscious? How Truth Transcends Theory Idealism vs Monad Theory Our Deepest Desire: To Know Ourselves Seity vs Soul Individuality & What Carries Over After Death We Are All Part of One Whole How Emotion & Meaning Impacts Reality Suffering as a Catalyst for Growth Taking Responsibility for Our Lives & Spiritual Growth The Very Real Force of Love Where Physics & Spirituality Meet Distinguishing Free Will & Unconscious Habits Reincarnation & NDEs Explained How Much We Currently Understand about Reality Shifting From the Mind to the Heart Facing the Future of Artificial Intelligence Collective Consciousness & Evil vs Good Competition vs Collaboration Are Aliens Real? Conclusion Essentia Foundation Mondadori #consciousness #freewill #quantumphysics #spirituality #selfknowing #awakening #Irreducible #federicofaggin #knowthyself #AI #existence #reality #natureofreality #mondadori
1:03

André Duqum is a wonderful host and guide in this conversation, where we discuss the fundamental nature of reality, quantum and classical physics, self knowing, courage, love, consciousness, free will, and artificial intelligence, among other topics listed in the chapter descriptions below. As André shares from my newest book "Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers, and Human Nature"... "We are eternal, conscious beings rather than perishable bodies, and we are here to learn crucial aspects of ourselves by interacting with each other in the physical universe that we have co created for this very purpose." It is with great hope that viewers of this conversation may find meaning in the ideas discussed, and encouragement to further your own self learning. - Federico Full Video 🌍👁️ Discussion Chapters👇 Intro His Spontaneous Spiritual Awakening Defining Consciousness: Classical vs Quantum View Can computers be Conscious? How Truth Transcends Theory Idealism vs Monad Theory Our Deepest Desire: To Know Ourselves Seity vs Soul Individuality & What Carries Over After Death We Are All Part of One Whole How Emotion & Meaning Impacts Reality Suffering as a Catalyst for Growth Taking Responsibility for Our Lives & Spiritual Growth The Very Real Force of Love Where Physics & Spirituality Meet Distinguishing Free Will & Unconscious Habits Reincarnation & NDEs Explained How Much We Currently Understand about Reality Shifting From the Mind to the Heart Facing the Future of Artificial Intelligence Collective Consciousness & Evil vs Good Competition vs Collaboration Are Aliens Real? Conclusion Essentia Foundation Mondadori #consciousness #freewill #quantumphysics #spirituality #selfknowing #awakening #Irreducible #federicofaggin #knowthyself #AI #existence #reality #natureofreality #mondadori

Federico Faggin

18,047 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

David Chalmers on why consciousness is science's greatest unsolved problem: Science has mapped subatomic particles, distant stars, the chemistry of life yet it remains almost completely silent on the one thing we know most directly: our own conscious experience. In a rare early interview, philosopher David Chalmers explains why: "Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing in the world and the most mysterious. Consciousness is what we start with when it comes to knowing the world. I know that I exist. I know that I'm conscious. Everything else is secondary." And yet, despite this intimacy, consciousness sticks out like a sore thumb in the scientific picture. Chalmers points to a deep irony: science has made extraordinary progress on phenomena that are extraordinarily remote: subatomic particles, distant galaxies, the molecular machinery of biology while making almost no progress on the one thing closest to us. Why? Because science, by design, eliminates the subjective. "To do proper science, you have to be objective. You have to eliminate anything subjective from the picture." He uses heat as the perfect example. Physics gives us a complete account of heat molecules in motion, energy transfer, temperature gradients. It explains every objective aspect of the phenomenon. But it never explains what hotness actually feels like. "Science doesn't actually give a theory of the conscious feeling of hotness." This is what Chalmers calls the Hard Problem of Consciousness. You can trace every neural signal from your heat sensor along your nerves into your brain and still have explained nothing about the subjective experience of feeling warm. As interviewer Jeffrey Mishlove puts it: you can't even do science without a conscious mind to observe, interpret, and make meaning of data. Consciousness is the precondition for science itself and yet science has no framework to account for it. Chalmers' conclusion is striking: The methods of science may need to be expanded. Consciousness might not be something science explains away. It might be something science has to learn to start with.
2:45

David Chalmers on why consciousness is science's greatest unsolved problem: Science has mapped subatomic particles, distant stars, the chemistry of life yet it remains almost completely silent on the one thing we know most directly: our own conscious experience. In a rare early interview, philosopher David Chalmers explains why: "Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing in the world and the most mysterious. Consciousness is what we start with when it comes to knowing the world. I know that I exist. I know that I'm conscious. Everything else is secondary." And yet, despite this intimacy, consciousness sticks out like a sore thumb in the scientific picture. Chalmers points to a deep irony: science has made extraordinary progress on phenomena that are extraordinarily remote: subatomic particles, distant galaxies, the molecular machinery of biology while making almost no progress on the one thing closest to us. Why? Because science, by design, eliminates the subjective. "To do proper science, you have to be objective. You have to eliminate anything subjective from the picture." He uses heat as the perfect example. Physics gives us a complete account of heat molecules in motion, energy transfer, temperature gradients. It explains every objective aspect of the phenomenon. But it never explains what hotness actually feels like. "Science doesn't actually give a theory of the conscious feeling of hotness." This is what Chalmers calls the Hard Problem of Consciousness. You can trace every neural signal from your heat sensor along your nerves into your brain and still have explained nothing about the subjective experience of feeling warm. As interviewer Jeffrey Mishlove puts it: you can't even do science without a conscious mind to observe, interpret, and make meaning of data. Consciousness is the precondition for science itself and yet science has no framework to account for it. Chalmers' conclusion is striking: The methods of science may need to be expanded. Consciousness might not be something science explains away. It might be something science has to learn to start with.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

31,628 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

When the camera looks into itself it collapses into a fractal cascade of ever-evolving geometry. You do the same thing in expanded states of consciousness. The difference being that you are conscious and can derive information from these fundamental structures of reality.
2:43

When the camera looks into itself it collapses into a fractal cascade of ever-evolving geometry. You do the same thing in expanded states of consciousness. The difference being that you are conscious and can derive information from these fundamental structures of reality.

Jay Anderson

28,203 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.
0:50

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.

Big Brain Philosophy

17,476 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Why quantum theory could have a fractal structure: explained in 83 minutes. The notion of true quantum nonlocality is absurd. In the latest episode of the Quantum Foundations Podcast, Prof Tim Palmer from the University of Oxford suggests that there is a hidden assumption in standard quantum mechanics, and dropping it will save us from this absurdity. Namely, the reality of counterfactuals: the physics of what could have happened but did not. Inspired by chaos theory and the fractal structure widespread in atmospheric physics, Palmer has developed a new underlying structure for quantum theory, with radical implications for our fundamental principles of quantum physics; the limits of quantum computation; and perhaps even the search for quantum gravity. Watch on my YouTube channel, or listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts!
1:34

Why quantum theory could have a fractal structure: explained in 83 minutes. The notion of true quantum nonlocality is absurd. In the latest episode of the Quantum Foundations Podcast, Prof Tim Palmer from the University of Oxford suggests that there is a hidden assumption in standard quantum mechanics, and dropping it will save us from this absurdity. Namely, the reality of counterfactuals: the physics of what could have happened but did not. Inspired by chaos theory and the fractal structure widespread in atmospheric physics, Palmer has developed a new underlying structure for quantum theory, with radical implications for our fundamental principles of quantum physics; the limits of quantum computation; and perhaps even the search for quantum gravity. Watch on my YouTube channel, or listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts!

Dr Maria Violaris

18,259 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is what happens when a quantum wave-function hits a wall that it does not have enough energy to cross. Part of it goes through anyway. This is the famous "tunnel-effect". A particle without quantum properties cannot do that.
0:33

This is what happens when a quantum wave-function hits a wall that it does not have enough energy to cross. Part of it goes through anyway. This is the famous "tunnel-effect". A particle without quantum properties cannot do that.

Sabine Hossenfelder

518,914 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is what separates quantum from classical computing... D-Wave, $QBTS, used their quantum computer to compute properties of magnetic materials in just minutes—a task that would require more than the world’s annual energy on a classical machine. “We are able to solve problems on our quantum computers that cannot be solved classically.” - Alan Baratz, CEO of D-Wave 🗣️
0:56

This is what separates quantum from classical computing... D-Wave, $QBTS, used their quantum computer to compute properties of magnetic materials in just minutes—a task that would require more than the world’s annual energy on a classical machine. “We are able to solve problems on our quantum computers that cannot be solved classically.” - Alan Baratz, CEO of D-Wave 🗣️

Stocktwits

29,311 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The amazing Suzanne Gildert on how evolution is not the “survival of the fittest” but the push for higher consciousness. Via the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics we see higher life driven more conscious. The next decade will confirm what is already observed.
0:59

The amazing Suzanne Gildert on how evolution is not the “survival of the fittest” but the push for higher consciousness. Via the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics we see higher life driven more conscious. The next decade will confirm what is already observed.

Brian Roemmele

16,125 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Did you know that 2025 is the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology? Hear physics laureate William Phillips speak about how hard it is to predict what quantum mechanics can be used for in the future. Similarly, it was just as hard to predict what it was to be used for 100 years ago. Hear the full conversation: #NobelPrize
1:41

Did you know that 2025 is the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology? Hear physics laureate William Phillips speak about how hard it is to predict what quantum mechanics can be used for in the future. Similarly, it was just as hard to predict what it was to be used for 100 years ago. Hear the full conversation: #NobelPrize

The Nobel Prize

13,242 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Israel's first quantum computer was funded by the Rothschild family through the Weizmann Institute of Science. The goal is not only to build quantum computers, but also to advance quantum communications, sensing, and cybersecurity. "Quantum computing is the holy grail of modern computing." "This computer will be able to calculate things that the largest computers cannot."
1:39

Israel's first quantum computer was funded by the Rothschild family through the Weizmann Institute of Science. The goal is not only to build quantum computers, but also to advance quantum communications, sensing, and cybersecurity. "Quantum computing is the holy grail of modern computing." "This computer will be able to calculate things that the largest computers cannot."

Shadow of Ezra

59,649 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Sakharov theorized that gravity came from the quantum vacuum fluctuations based on Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Nobel prize in 1965. Eric W. Davis says, "we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. It emerges from the fabric of spacetime when curved." Gravity comes from energy density and is a pressure force. The Casimir effect is a negative pressure force that pushes out zero point energy fluctuations. The mainstream view of physics is woefully incomplete. We can manipulate gravity and produce 'free' energy from the zero point energy.
1:19

Sakharov theorized that gravity came from the quantum vacuum fluctuations based on Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Nobel prize in 1965. Eric W. Davis says, "we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. It emerges from the fabric of spacetime when curved." Gravity comes from energy density and is a pressure force. The Casimir effect is a negative pressure force that pushes out zero point energy fluctuations. The mainstream view of physics is woefully incomplete. We can manipulate gravity and produce 'free' energy from the zero point energy.

Ashton Forbes

99,080 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

⚡ QUANTUM REALITY JUST BROKE TIME ITSELF ⚡ Scientists have uncovered something unimaginable: a way to measure time without clocks, without ticking, without a starting point. Just pure quantum patterns… electrons dancing inside super-charged atoms… creating “fingerprints” that reveal exactly where in time you are. No beginning. No end. Just a map of the universe hidden in quantum waves. This changes EVERYTHING — from quantum healing… to energy work… to how we understand reality itself. JOIN TO LEARN MORE 👇👇👇
1:30

⚡ QUANTUM REALITY JUST BROKE TIME ITSELF ⚡ Scientists have uncovered something unimaginable: a way to measure time without clocks, without ticking, without a starting point. Just pure quantum patterns… electrons dancing inside super-charged atoms… creating “fingerprints” that reveal exactly where in time you are. No beginning. No end. Just a map of the universe hidden in quantum waves. This changes EVERYTHING — from quantum healing… to energy work… to how we understand reality itself. JOIN TO LEARN MORE 👇👇👇

Mr. Pool

19,108 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

In this scene from the 2016 movie Arrival, Louise learns that the non-human species perceives time non-linearly as a simultaneous "now" rather than a linear sequence of cause and effect. Contact with an intelligent non-human species that perceives time non-linearly would force humanity to rethink our assumptions about how time and space actually work. Physicists are already finding that the fundamental laws of quantum physics do not distinguish between past and future, suggesting that the forward flow of time we experience may not actually be a fundamental property of reality...
3:30

In this scene from the 2016 movie Arrival, Louise learns that the non-human species perceives time non-linearly as a simultaneous "now" rather than a linear sequence of cause and effect. Contact with an intelligent non-human species that perceives time non-linearly would force humanity to rethink our assumptions about how time and space actually work. Physicists are already finding that the fundamental laws of quantum physics do not distinguish between past and future, suggesting that the forward flow of time we experience may not actually be a fundamental property of reality...

Disclosure Party

1,452,448 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Core Memory podcast with Suzanne Gildert on the hunt for AI consciousness in the quantum realm. The theory being that LLMs are too constrained to really get to robots and AIs that are really like us 00:00:00 – Consciousness: The First AI Training Model? 00:02:03 – Exploring the Quantum Mind with AI 00:04:42 – Will Robots Ever Have Rights? 00:07:54 – The AI Paradox: Fear vs. Progress 00:13:20 – Can Language Models Teach Robots? 00:17:29 – Why Today’s AI Feels Like a Zombie 00:23:47 – Quantum Computing Meets Artificial Consciousness 00:29:50 – Free Will, Entanglement, and Decision Making 00:38:21 – Teaching a Robot to Think, Not Just React 00:52:51 – Will Conscious AI Power Space Exploration?
1:10:42

Core Memory podcast with Suzanne Gildert on the hunt for AI consciousness in the quantum realm. The theory being that LLMs are too constrained to really get to robots and AIs that are really like us 00:00:00 – Consciousness: The First AI Training Model? 00:02:03 – Exploring the Quantum Mind with AI 00:04:42 – Will Robots Ever Have Rights? 00:07:54 – The AI Paradox: Fear vs. Progress 00:13:20 – Can Language Models Teach Robots? 00:17:29 – Why Today’s AI Feels Like a Zombie 00:23:47 – Quantum Computing Meets Artificial Consciousness 00:29:50 – Free Will, Entanglement, and Decision Making 00:38:21 – Teaching a Robot to Think, Not Just React 00:52:51 – Will Conscious AI Power Space Exploration?

Ashlee Vance

17,189 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A group of physicists say they've proved that quantum mechanics can be explained without quantum mechanics. I asked ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude what they think about the paper.
5:01

A group of physicists say they've proved that quantum mechanics can be explained without quantum mechanics. I asked ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude what they think about the paper.

Sabine Hossenfelder

93,367 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sam Harris on why consciousness is more certain than the universe — and why free will is a different problem entirely Pulling out a clip from my conversation with Sam Harris (Making Sense Podcast) where he draws an asymmetry I think is worth sitting with. His claim: consciousness is the one thing in the universe that can't be an illusion — even more certain than physics. We could be brains in vats, in the matrix, on an alien supercomputer. None of it changes the fact that something seems to be happening. That seeming IS consciousness. Free will? Different story. Sam argues it's not just illusory but incoherent — provably so, regardless of how you tune determinism vs quantum indeterminism. He agrees with Sapolsky on the conclusion but adds a unique contribution on the experience of free will itself. Curious what the community thinks. Does the consciousness-as-bedrock argument hold under closer inspection, or is it just Descartes in new clothing?
5:16

Sam Harris on why consciousness is more certain than the universe — and why free will is a different problem entirely Pulling out a clip from my conversation with Sam Harris (Making Sense Podcast) where he draws an asymmetry I think is worth sitting with. His claim: consciousness is the one thing in the universe that can't be an illusion — even more certain than physics. We could be brains in vats, in the matrix, on an alien supercomputer. None of it changes the fact that something seems to be happening. That seeming IS consciousness. Free will? Different story. Sam argues it's not just illusory but incoherent — provably so, regardless of how you tune determinism vs quantum indeterminism. He agrees with Sapolsky on the conclusion but adds a unique contribution on the experience of free will itself. Curious what the community thinks. Does the consciousness-as-bedrock argument hold under closer inspection, or is it just Descartes in new clothing?

Prof. Brian Keating

26,472 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat