正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Feel like having your mind blown? 🤯 This replica Moai Statue🗿is only 5Tons (10,000lbs), and was moved just 100 meters. 📍YET, the Egyptians inexplicably transported the 1,000 metric tonne (2.2M lbs) Ramesseum Statue 170 miles! 📍That’s 220X HEAVIER than this Moai‼️ Something tells me that the Egyptians didn’t toggle...

67,258 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Jimmy Corsetti 的头像
Jimmy Corsetti1 年前

📍Another way of putting it: This Moai statue is 220X LIGHTER than the Heaviest Egyptian statue… …and the Egyptians moved the 220X HEAVIER statue nearly 2,300X the distance‼️ Think about that 🤯

Thinborne 的头像
Thinborne2 年前

RT @UniverseIce: Yo, @thinborne is the new king of aramid fiber (600d) cases. They're super thin, have Magsafe, and come with a free temper…

The Stone-Nub Language 的头像
The Stone-Nub Language1 年前

Size comparison shows the walking method to be false.

Jimmy Corsetti 的头像
Jimmy Corsetti1 年前

Thank you for sharing this!! Yes, they need to test the method on the tallest Moai to demonstrate it could be done.

3MIKE 的头像
3MIKE1 年前

The thing is, the statues of Easter Island are much taller.

Jimmy Corsetti 的头像
Jimmy Corsetti1 年前

This replica Moai is 10ft tall, whereas the Ramesseum statue is 60ft tall. The avg height of the Moai is 13ft, with the largest at 33ft.

C. Hunter McConnell 🇺🇲 (This Is/Ridiculous) 的头像
C. Hunter McConnell 🇺🇲 (This Is/Ridiculous)1 年前

It's not as hard as you might think. Most of your colossal statues in Egypt were probably moved via a "fulcrum" method where they set the statue on its back and used a pivot point, like a smaller hard rock, quartz for example, and just spun it around on that point, fairly easily. I will add a video that elaborates from an amateur researcher, Wally Wallington.

Jimmy Corsetti 的头像
Jimmy Corsetti1 年前

Do you really consider that method feasible over a distance of 170 miles? Btw, Wally used his fulcrum on a concrete foundation.

scrumpyjobe 的头像
scrumpyjobe1 年前

I thought they were bigger, with most of the Moai Statue underground ?

Fanta 的头像
Fanta1 年前

That'd explain how they moved them, except their replica only represents the visible part of the Moai

Texblonde2023 的头像
Texblonde20231 年前

Yeah, nothing about the building of pyramids makes sense!

相关视频

Bear with me while we dive into the math here… let’s start out with the King’s Chamber in the Great Pyramid. Now the King’s Chamber is a rectangular room, but upon closer examination you’ll notice it’s also a perfect double-square. Now before we begin, academia has confirmed that the ancient Egyptians’ knowledge of mathematics was fairly rudimentary, and they had NOT discovered pi (π) nor phi (φ), commonly referred to as the golden ratio. Remember, phi is a ratio between two numbers that is endless and exhibits incredible mathematical properties (permeating throughout all nature). As a ratio system, we can use phi in all it’s variations—including it’s square and square root—and still preserve these unique properties. The same goes for pi. See below, we’ll come back to these in a bit: π = 3.14159 | φ = 1.61803 Getting back to the King’s Chamber, the short side of the rectangle (or the width of the room) measures 5.236 meters. The length of the rectangle measures 10.472 meters. Now take 5.236 x 2 + 10.472 x 2 (which would be the perimeter of the chamber floor or ceiling) and you get 31.416 meters. That gives us π x 100. Interesting… let’s keep going. Again, let’s take the width of the rectangle of 5.236 meters and add φ^2 (1.618^2 = 2.618). Now, we’ll add 5.236 meters + 2.618 meters = 7.854 meters. Now the diagonal measurement from the bottom corner to the top corner of one of the faces at either end of the rectangular chamber is… 7.854 meters. Wow. Let’s continue. Now we’ll again add 2.618 (φ^2) to 7.854 which then equals 10.472 meters. Hmm… If you recall, 10.472 meters also equals the length of the rectangle. And again let’s add φ^2 + 10.472 = 13.09 meters. 13.09 meters also exactly measures the length from the upper corner of the King’s Chamber to the lower corner on the opposite-side of the room. Now for the kicker. NONE of this would occur in METERS (or any derivation of the metric system) if the room were ANY other size, even if the proportions remained the same. Remember, the meter was derived in the late 18th century and is based on the meridional circumference of the Earth at its poles. Academia tells us the Egyptians had no knowledge of the world as a globe… Academia also tells us they had no knowledge of π nor the golden ratio. How then were they able to achieve the extraordinary metric proportions of the King’s Chamber? 🤔 “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality.” — Albert Einstein

Therion

399,290 次观看 • 3 年前