Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Fellow Canadians 🇨🇦 I was completely shocked watching Rosie Barton on CBC today. She actually agreed that Pierre Poilievre’s proposal to remove the gas tax could lower fuel prices by about $0.25 per litre at the pump right away. Critics are pushing back hard, arguing it would create a...

JayGenXer's profile picture

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

87,644 subscribers

30,731 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is what Prime Minister’s Questions actually looks like when the gloves come off. Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre went head-to-head in the House today, and the sparks were flying. Carney tried the usual “economics professor” routine about deficits and his central bank record. Poilievre hammered him on the gas tax, printing money, and the cost-of-living crisis crushing Canadians. The exchange is going viral for a reason... it’s raw, unfiltered, and shows exactly why so many Canadians are tuning back in. One side is still playing the old Ottawa game. The other is speaking like a normal person who actually feels the pain at the pump.
1:27

This is what Prime Minister’s Questions actually looks like when the gloves come off. Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre went head-to-head in the House today, and the sparks were flying. Carney tried the usual “economics professor” routine about deficits and his central bank record. Poilievre hammered him on the gas tax, printing money, and the cost-of-living crisis crushing Canadians. The exchange is going viral for a reason... it’s raw, unfiltered, and shows exactly why so many Canadians are tuning back in. One side is still playing the old Ottawa game. The other is speaking like a normal person who actually feels the pain at the pump.

The Shift Has Hit The Fan

74,139 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: AAP National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal says, "...Pure petrol should be available in our country at ₹82 per litre; and if we switch to E20 fuel, I believe the price should drop even further, to around ₹70 per litre, compared to the ₹102 currently charged for E20 petrol. We can calculate diesel prices in the same way; diesel prices could also be reduced. If petrol and diesel prices come down, I believe it would deal a significant blow to inflation and provide people with much-needed relief... On behalf of the people of this country, I demand that the government immediately start supplying pure petrol at ₹82 per litre; and if E20 is to be supplied, the price should be even lower."
3:01

#WATCH | Delhi: AAP National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal says, "...Pure petrol should be available in our country at ₹82 per litre; and if we switch to E20 fuel, I believe the price should drop even further, to around ₹70 per litre, compared to the ₹102 currently charged for E20 petrol. We can calculate diesel prices in the same way; diesel prices could also be reduced. If petrol and diesel prices come down, I believe it would deal a significant blow to inflation and provide people with much-needed relief... On behalf of the people of this country, I demand that the government immediately start supplying pure petrol at ₹82 per litre; and if E20 is to be supplied, the price should be even lower."

ANI

99,736 views • 8 days ago

🇨🇦 Lisa Raitt just torched the elite fantasy of Canada joining the EU. On a national panel, she was asked if it would “save us.” Her answer: “No. I don’t think it’s good politics either.” She nailed it perfectly: There are **two types of Canadians right now**. - The comfortable ones — homeowners with pensions who can afford to indulge in “political fancy” like becoming part of Europe. - And then there’s **everyone else** — the Ontario families getting laid off as companies close because of tariffs, paying **$1.78 a litre** at the gas pump, and watching the cost of living crush them. “There’s a lot of fires going on here at home in Canada.” This isn’t abstract globalist talk. Ontario’s manufacturing heartland, auto plants, steel and aluminum workers are getting hammered while elites daydream about Brussels. Mark Carney and the Laurentian crowd need to wake up. Canadians aren’t looking for a new flag — we’re looking for lower gas prices, real jobs, and a government that puts **Ontario families first**. Joining the EU? Not while we’re bleeding at home. Ontario — what do you think? Should we even be entertaining this nonsense? #OntarioFirst #cdnpoli #LisaRaitt #NoToEU #CostOfLivingCrisis #CanadaFirst
1:31

🇨🇦 Lisa Raitt just torched the elite fantasy of Canada joining the EU. On a national panel, she was asked if it would “save us.” Her answer: “No. I don’t think it’s good politics either.” She nailed it perfectly: There are **two types of Canadians right now**. - The comfortable ones — homeowners with pensions who can afford to indulge in “political fancy” like becoming part of Europe. - And then there’s **everyone else** — the Ontario families getting laid off as companies close because of tariffs, paying **$1.78 a litre** at the gas pump, and watching the cost of living crush them. “There’s a lot of fires going on here at home in Canada.” This isn’t abstract globalist talk. Ontario’s manufacturing heartland, auto plants, steel and aluminum workers are getting hammered while elites daydream about Brussels. Mark Carney and the Laurentian crowd need to wake up. Canadians aren’t looking for a new flag — we’re looking for lower gas prices, real jobs, and a government that puts **Ontario families first**. Joining the EU? Not while we’re bleeding at home. Ontario — what do you think? Should we even be entertaining this nonsense? #OntarioFirst #cdnpoli #LisaRaitt #NoToEU #CostOfLivingCrisis #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

49,969 views • 1 month ago

Fellow Canadians 🇨🇦 This is what steak looks like at Costco yesterday. Kirkland Canadian AAA beef — $82… $86… $87… $91 per pack. Families are getting absolutely crushed at the grocery store while the Liberals and NDP keep pushing carbon taxes, massive deficits, and regulations that drive food prices through the roof. It honestly feels like the only affordable protein they want us eating is bugs and crickets. This isn’t normal. This isn’t sustainable. And this didn’t happen by accident. What are YOU paying for meat or groceries right now? How much longer are we supposed to put up with this cost-of-living nightmare? Drop your city + your latest meat prices below 👇 #CostOfLivingCrisis #CanadaFirst #cdnpoli
0:20

Fellow Canadians 🇨🇦 This is what steak looks like at Costco yesterday. Kirkland Canadian AAA beef — $82… $86… $87… $91 per pack. Families are getting absolutely crushed at the grocery store while the Liberals and NDP keep pushing carbon taxes, massive deficits, and regulations that drive food prices through the roof. It honestly feels like the only affordable protein they want us eating is bugs and crickets. This isn’t normal. This isn’t sustainable. And this didn’t happen by accident. What are YOU paying for meat or groceries right now? How much longer are we supposed to put up with this cost-of-living nightmare? Drop your city + your latest meat prices below 👇 #CostOfLivingCrisis #CanadaFirst #cdnpoli

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

76,560 views • 3 months ago

Poilievre today "You need to take home more of your pay, and that's why Conservatives want to cut your income tax, so that of every dollar you earn, you bring home more of that dollar." "We're going to end all taxes on home building." "Right now, the single biggest cost for a new home is taxes." "If we got rid of the taxes, the average home would be about $200,000 less across Canada." Pierre Poilievre
0:49

Poilievre today "You need to take home more of your pay, and that's why Conservatives want to cut your income tax, so that of every dollar you earn, you bring home more of that dollar." "We're going to end all taxes on home building." "Right now, the single biggest cost for a new home is taxes." "If we got rid of the taxes, the average home would be about $200,000 less across Canada." Pierre Poilievre

cbcwatcher

62,034 views • 9 months ago

Rosie Barton is either ignoring Poilievre's words or is deliberately misleading the CBC audience. First she goes along with the Carney story that he was asked to be Finance Minister under Harper "Harper's former director of communications responded to this by saying Carney's not telling the whole story and that Harper in no way supports Carney." Next she says "But we also heard Poilievre doubling down on the need to axe the consumer carbon tax, even though no Liberal leadership candidate supports it going forward." Carney is keeping a Carbon Tax and here is what Poilievre says about it "And after much reflection, I have concluded that the carbon tax will be an even bigger issue in the coming election than we thought." "He said just a few days ago that he doesn't want to "axe the tax."" "Mr. Carney's new and bigger carbon tax will help America take every industrial job from Canada." It's pretty clear that Poilievre is fighting Carney and the CBC!
3:09

Rosie Barton is either ignoring Poilievre's words or is deliberately misleading the CBC audience. First she goes along with the Carney story that he was asked to be Finance Minister under Harper "Harper's former director of communications responded to this by saying Carney's not telling the whole story and that Harper in no way supports Carney." Next she says "But we also heard Poilievre doubling down on the need to axe the consumer carbon tax, even though no Liberal leadership candidate supports it going forward." Carney is keeping a Carbon Tax and here is what Poilievre says about it "And after much reflection, I have concluded that the carbon tax will be an even bigger issue in the coming election than we thought." "He said just a few days ago that he doesn't want to "axe the tax."" "Mr. Carney's new and bigger carbon tax will help America take every industrial job from Canada." It's pretty clear that Poilievre is fighting Carney and the CBC!

cbcwatcher

127,680 views • 1 year ago

Dave Ramsey explains why the government stopped making you pay your taxes by hand, and what would happen if it started again. RAMSEY: “If we brought this back, there would be a revolution. People would burn Washington, DC, down. “If the tax person from the IRS had to stand in the lobby of your company, and you got paid in cash, and you had to take your cash and hand it to the tax collector and count it out every time you got paid, people would realize how big a tick on your butt the government is, how big a parasite the government is. “And they would, I’m telling you, there’d be pitchforks and torches. “If you actually saw and physically had to take possession of the money and then give it back in cash to the government when you got paid, people’s faces would melt off.” KAMEL: “Just the amount of $100 bills you’re just giving to the IRS for doing nothing. That hurts. It would be a Tea Party round two.” RAMSEY: “So it was a really brilliant idea to do income tax withholding.” KAMEL: “Just make it all behind the scenes.” RAMSEY: “Brilliant psychological trick.”
1:39

Dave Ramsey explains why the government stopped making you pay your taxes by hand, and what would happen if it started again. RAMSEY: “If we brought this back, there would be a revolution. People would burn Washington, DC, down. “If the tax person from the IRS had to stand in the lobby of your company, and you got paid in cash, and you had to take your cash and hand it to the tax collector and count it out every time you got paid, people would realize how big a tick on your butt the government is, how big a parasite the government is. “And they would, I’m telling you, there’d be pitchforks and torches. “If you actually saw and physically had to take possession of the money and then give it back in cash to the government when you got paid, people’s faces would melt off.” KAMEL: “Just the amount of $100 bills you’re just giving to the IRS for doing nothing. That hurts. It would be a Tea Party round two.” RAMSEY: “So it was a really brilliant idea to do income tax withholding.” KAMEL: “Just make it all behind the scenes.” RAMSEY: “Brilliant psychological trick.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

732,296 views • 7 days ago

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast
2:35

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 views • 6 months ago

#BREAKING: Ari: What do you plan to do with the money you raise from the flat 2% tax on the super wealthy and raising the corporate tax to 11.5%? Mayor Mamdani: “…that would get you $9 billion…this is our revenue plan. This would MORE THAN pay for our economic agenda. It would actually allow us to start Trump-proofing our city, and what I mean by that is we’re seeing right now what the Trump agenda portends for New Yorkers. This is a man who ran a presidential campaign on the premise of cheaper groceries, that is now trying to cut SNAP benefits to make it even harder to afford those same groceries. We have to protect New Yorkers with the least from the attacks from the man with the most power in this country.”👊
1:10

#BREAKING: Ari: What do you plan to do with the money you raise from the flat 2% tax on the super wealthy and raising the corporate tax to 11.5%? Mayor Mamdani: “…that would get you $9 billion…this is our revenue plan. This would MORE THAN pay for our economic agenda. It would actually allow us to start Trump-proofing our city, and what I mean by that is we’re seeing right now what the Trump agenda portends for New Yorkers. This is a man who ran a presidential campaign on the premise of cheaper groceries, that is now trying to cut SNAP benefits to make it even harder to afford those same groceries. We have to protect New Yorkers with the least from the attacks from the man with the most power in this country.”👊

Emoluments Clause

446,232 views • 1 month ago

I’ve got some bad news- the auto excise tax increase bill that Maura Healey proposed is making its way through the legislature. This is a bill that would allow cities and towns to triple the auto excise tax. That’s right- it would be a 300% increase. You would potentially be paying 7.5% on your auto excise tax as opposed to the current rate of 2.5%. That would mean the average working family in Massachusetts would be paying thousands more in excise tax when they buy a new car. Massachusetts families are already paying too much. The last thing we need is a higher excise tax. When I’m governor, we’ll cut taxes and cut utility bills to make the state more affordable for working families. #magov #mapoli
1:02

I’ve got some bad news- the auto excise tax increase bill that Maura Healey proposed is making its way through the legislature. This is a bill that would allow cities and towns to triple the auto excise tax. That’s right- it would be a 300% increase. You would potentially be paying 7.5% on your auto excise tax as opposed to the current rate of 2.5%. That would mean the average working family in Massachusetts would be paying thousands more in excise tax when they buy a new car. Massachusetts families are already paying too much. The last thing we need is a higher excise tax. When I’m governor, we’ll cut taxes and cut utility bills to make the state more affordable for working families. #magov #mapoli

Brian Shortsleeve for Massachusetts

41,958 views • 8 months ago

I think the president is absolutely paying a political price for $4 gasoline right now, especially as the midterm narrative is already starting much earlier than usual. But what happens between now and November is still unknown. If oil prices fall back to the $70–$75 range, gas prices could stop being a major issue altogether. The challenge is timing even if oil drops immediately, there’s still oil sitting in inventory, tankers already on the water, and supply moving through refineries at higher prices. Realistically, it would take about three weeks for consumers to fully feel lower gas prices at the pump.
1:19

I think the president is absolutely paying a political price for $4 gasoline right now, especially as the midterm narrative is already starting much earlier than usual. But what happens between now and November is still unknown. If oil prices fall back to the $70–$75 range, gas prices could stop being a major issue altogether. The challenge is timing even if oil drops immediately, there’s still oil sitting in inventory, tankers already on the water, and supply moving through refineries at higher prices. Realistically, it would take about three weeks for consumers to fully feel lower gas prices at the pump.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

77,139 views • 1 month ago

CBC brings in Liberal shill Tyler Meredith, former Trudeau economic advisor, to cover for Carney's decision not to table a budget He is asked "And so that likely means with holidays and all of that, that there probably will be a two year period, about a two year period where their government will not have presented a budget. What do you make of that?" Meredith excuse #1 "Well, remember the government actually did present the fall economic statement in December." That was the OLD Trudeau government, not the Carney government Excuse #2 "uncertainty about what's happening in the US" Excuse #3 "Because of course, if we are in a recession, that will have a significant impact on public finances" It is even more important for Canadians and the financial community to know the state of Canada's finances with a new government, in times of uncertainty and when there is a looming possibility of recession. CBC needs to bring in a REAL economist... not of the Liberal shill variety! CBC News Brodie Fenlon
3:03

CBC brings in Liberal shill Tyler Meredith, former Trudeau economic advisor, to cover for Carney's decision not to table a budget He is asked "And so that likely means with holidays and all of that, that there probably will be a two year period, about a two year period where their government will not have presented a budget. What do you make of that?" Meredith excuse #1 "Well, remember the government actually did present the fall economic statement in December." That was the OLD Trudeau government, not the Carney government Excuse #2 "uncertainty about what's happening in the US" Excuse #3 "Because of course, if we are in a recession, that will have a significant impact on public finances" It is even more important for Canadians and the financial community to know the state of Canada's finances with a new government, in times of uncertainty and when there is a looming possibility of recession. CBC needs to bring in a REAL economist... not of the Liberal shill variety! CBC News Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

50,973 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING: GAS PRICES ARE ABOUT TO COLLAPSE! 🚨 The Iranian delegation just touched down in Switzerland for high-stakes talks with the U.S. — negotiations are BACK ON! 🔥 This could flood the market with cheap oil, slam the brakes on prices at the pump, and deliver a MASSIVE WIN for American drivers. Next week is going to be EPIC. Are you ready for cheaper gas? ⛽💰 RT if you’re tired of high prices! What do you think — $2 gas coming back? 👇 #GasPricesCrashing #IranTalks #EnergyCrisisOver
0:25

🚨 BREAKING: GAS PRICES ARE ABOUT TO COLLAPSE! 🚨 The Iranian delegation just touched down in Switzerland for high-stakes talks with the U.S. — negotiations are BACK ON! 🔥 This could flood the market with cheap oil, slam the brakes on prices at the pump, and deliver a MASSIVE WIN for American drivers. Next week is going to be EPIC. Are you ready for cheaper gas? ⛽💰 RT if you’re tired of high prices! What do you think — $2 gas coming back? 👇 #GasPricesCrashing #IranTalks #EnergyCrisisOver

CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOT🇺🇸

165,294 views • 26 days ago

David Friedberg: California’s “Billionaire Tax” is a Trojan Horse to Go After the Middle Class's Private Assets david friedberg: “The reason they're calling it a billionaire tax is to make it easier for people to vote for it, and sign up to this entirely new tax system that they're proposing to put on all Americans at some point, and for the first time ever degrading our private property rights.” “Forget about how much wealth you have, forget about how rich you are, forget about the term billionaire, millionaire, whatever it is.” “We're creating, or proposing the creation, of a new tax system that allows the government for the first time ever to come in and audit everything you own.” “All the jewelry your grandma gave you, the value of all the couches in your house, the value of your car, the value of all your stocks and bonds, and the government can come in, and for the first time, look through the veil into your personal property.” “And say, ‘Here's how much all this stuff is worth. I'm charging you a percentage of that. That's what I need to get paid.’ And it doesn't matter that it starts with billionaires. What matters is that we're giving the government the right to look into our private property and take a percentage of it every year.” “The total net worth of billionaires in the US is $8 trillion.” “The net worth of the US, the middle class, and everyone else is $170 trillion, compared to $8 trillion of the billionaires.” Chamath Palihapitiya: “They need a way to open the door so that they can go after the real honey pot.” “The real honeypot is not 200 people.” david friedberg: “Just so everyone understands the real goal of this is not to tax billionaires, because there are other ways to tax billionaires.” “Charge them a capital gains tax if they borrow against their assets that they haven't paid capital gains tax on. Very simple, that can resolve this.” “Another thing you can do, you can raise the capital gains tax rate. Sounds unpopular. I don't agree with that, but that's another way to deal with this, which is to take the capital gains tax rate from 20% to 30%. You could do that.” “The real goal of this is to create, for the first time in American history, a private property asset seizure tax. Because they're going after the $170 trillion, not the $8 trillion that the billionaires have.”
1:51

David Friedberg: California’s “Billionaire Tax” is a Trojan Horse to Go After the Middle Class's Private Assets david friedberg: “The reason they're calling it a billionaire tax is to make it easier for people to vote for it, and sign up to this entirely new tax system that they're proposing to put on all Americans at some point, and for the first time ever degrading our private property rights.” “Forget about how much wealth you have, forget about how rich you are, forget about the term billionaire, millionaire, whatever it is.” “We're creating, or proposing the creation, of a new tax system that allows the government for the first time ever to come in and audit everything you own.” “All the jewelry your grandma gave you, the value of all the couches in your house, the value of your car, the value of all your stocks and bonds, and the government can come in, and for the first time, look through the veil into your personal property.” “And say, ‘Here's how much all this stuff is worth. I'm charging you a percentage of that. That's what I need to get paid.’ And it doesn't matter that it starts with billionaires. What matters is that we're giving the government the right to look into our private property and take a percentage of it every year.” “The total net worth of billionaires in the US is $8 trillion.” “The net worth of the US, the middle class, and everyone else is $170 trillion, compared to $8 trillion of the billionaires.” Chamath Palihapitiya: “They need a way to open the door so that they can go after the real honey pot.” “The real honeypot is not 200 people.” david friedberg: “Just so everyone understands the real goal of this is not to tax billionaires, because there are other ways to tax billionaires.” “Charge them a capital gains tax if they borrow against their assets that they haven't paid capital gains tax on. Very simple, that can resolve this.” “Another thing you can do, you can raise the capital gains tax rate. Sounds unpopular. I don't agree with that, but that's another way to deal with this, which is to take the capital gains tax rate from 20% to 30%. You could do that.” “The real goal of this is to create, for the first time in American history, a private property asset seizure tax. Because they're going after the $170 trillion, not the $8 trillion that the billionaires have.”

The All-In Podcast

1,806,171 views • 6 months ago

Dave Ramsey advises a woman if she should pay capital gains $50k to the IRS or invest it Caller: “we need to know if we should pay capital gain of $50k to the IRS or invest using a 1031 exchange” Dave: so your selling a piece of investment real estate for how much Caller: “yes we are,we are listing it for $499 we probably make about $300k equity on it” Dave: so the tax people are saying you have a $300k gain at 15% that would be $45k Caller: “and with all of the money we’ve invested into the rental they are saying we would probably walk away with a $50k capital gain tax”
3:35

Dave Ramsey advises a woman if she should pay capital gains $50k to the IRS or invest it Caller: “we need to know if we should pay capital gain of $50k to the IRS or invest using a 1031 exchange” Dave: so your selling a piece of investment real estate for how much Caller: “yes we are,we are listing it for $499 we probably make about $300k equity on it” Dave: so the tax people are saying you have a $300k gain at 15% that would be $45k Caller: “and with all of the money we’ve invested into the rental they are saying we would probably walk away with a $50k capital gain tax”

zaza

211,189 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Mumbai: On steps the Government should take to give relief to common citizens, Former Deputy Managing Director, IMF, Gita Gopinath says, “The govt is already to some extent supporting the economy because it has not let prices at the fuel pump go up by as much as one would expect it to, given how much world oil prices have risen…that itself is like an implicit subsidy to households and companies…at this current moment, providing more targeted support is a good way to go. More generally, what would be helpful is doing further reforms in terms of improving the ease of doing business, having a positive story on AI…these are the kinds of actions that would help increase interest in India as a destination for investment capital flows, and that would also take the pressure off the rupee.”
1:20

#WATCH | Mumbai: On steps the Government should take to give relief to common citizens, Former Deputy Managing Director, IMF, Gita Gopinath says, “The govt is already to some extent supporting the economy because it has not let prices at the fuel pump go up by as much as one would expect it to, given how much world oil prices have risen…that itself is like an implicit subsidy to households and companies…at this current moment, providing more targeted support is a good way to go. More generally, what would be helpful is doing further reforms in terms of improving the ease of doing business, having a positive story on AI…these are the kinds of actions that would help increase interest in India as a destination for investment capital flows, and that would also take the pressure off the rupee.”

ANI

28,300 views • 1 month ago

VIDEO EXCLUSIVE: What the CBC deleted from their ambush of Pierre Poilievre Last week a government comedian from Trudeau’s CBC’s state broadcaster attended a Pierre Poilievre rally to ambush the Conservative Party leader. Dan Dillabough, who works for the low-rated CBC show: This Hour Has 22 Minutes, tried to reheat the tired gag that Mary Walsh first did decades ago with her character Marg Delahunty, where she would interrupt and berate politicians. In Dillabough’s version, it was done without the costume, the colourful character or any of the jokes. And painfully, without the usual 22 Minutes laugh track. The CBC tweeted out the video of their ambush, which bombed with viewers on social media. But at the 1:15 mark in the video, a jump-cut edit can be seen — something had been deleted. What was it? It couldn’t have been something embarrassing said by Poilievre — that would have been kept in for sure. Rebel News reached out to Chuck Thompson, head of public affairs at the CBC. He replied saying, “as is the case with most interviews that 22 Minutes does, this one was edited for time.” Thompson did send over the full, unedited version of the interaction in question, however, which included the deleted clip — which was a grand total of three seconds! So what were those three seconds? It was Dillabough responding to Poilievre’s criticism of the CBC. Poilievre had just told Dillabough that when he’s prime minister, CBC staff like him will “have to earn a living rather than getting it from taxpayers’ money”. It was Dillabough’s reply that was cut out by CBC editors: “Oh listen, I’m one of the good ones.” Three seconds — it wasn’t to save time. So why was that comment cut? Those three seconds showed Dillabough panicking in the moment, not knowing what to say when Poilievre predictably criticized the CBC. Perhaps by claiming he was one of the “good ones”, Dillabough thought he might ingratiate himself with Poilievre, who seemed bored with the whole exchange. But more importantly, Dillabough’s comments confirmed that he knows most CBC staff, from the CEO on down, are partisan activists who do seek to undermine the Conservative Party under the guise of journalism or, in this case, comedy. He was saying the quiet part out loud — and claiming not to be part of it. Dillabough was condemning the rest of the CBC — he was throwing his colleagues under the bus. There was no editorial or comedic reason to cut those three seconds. They were cut for purely political reasons — so as not to embarrass the CBC politically. Which just proves that everything at the CBC — from journalism to “comedy” — is edited with a political eye. But even as they released the full video to Rebel News, the CBC couldn’t help one last act of disinformation — claiming it was “edited for time.” There are only three things you need to know about the CBC: 1. They take $1.5 billion of your tax dollars every year. 2. They hate you. 3. And they lie to you. FIGHT BACK! Sign our petition at
0:21

VIDEO EXCLUSIVE: What the CBC deleted from their ambush of Pierre Poilievre Last week a government comedian from Trudeau’s CBC’s state broadcaster attended a Pierre Poilievre rally to ambush the Conservative Party leader. Dan Dillabough, who works for the low-rated CBC show: This Hour Has 22 Minutes, tried to reheat the tired gag that Mary Walsh first did decades ago with her character Marg Delahunty, where she would interrupt and berate politicians. In Dillabough’s version, it was done without the costume, the colourful character or any of the jokes. And painfully, without the usual 22 Minutes laugh track. The CBC tweeted out the video of their ambush, which bombed with viewers on social media. But at the 1:15 mark in the video, a jump-cut edit can be seen — something had been deleted. What was it? It couldn’t have been something embarrassing said by Poilievre — that would have been kept in for sure. Rebel News reached out to Chuck Thompson, head of public affairs at the CBC. He replied saying, “as is the case with most interviews that 22 Minutes does, this one was edited for time.” Thompson did send over the full, unedited version of the interaction in question, however, which included the deleted clip — which was a grand total of three seconds! So what were those three seconds? It was Dillabough responding to Poilievre’s criticism of the CBC. Poilievre had just told Dillabough that when he’s prime minister, CBC staff like him will “have to earn a living rather than getting it from taxpayers’ money”. It was Dillabough’s reply that was cut out by CBC editors: “Oh listen, I’m one of the good ones.” Three seconds — it wasn’t to save time. So why was that comment cut? Those three seconds showed Dillabough panicking in the moment, not knowing what to say when Poilievre predictably criticized the CBC. Perhaps by claiming he was one of the “good ones”, Dillabough thought he might ingratiate himself with Poilievre, who seemed bored with the whole exchange. But more importantly, Dillabough’s comments confirmed that he knows most CBC staff, from the CEO on down, are partisan activists who do seek to undermine the Conservative Party under the guise of journalism or, in this case, comedy. He was saying the quiet part out loud — and claiming not to be part of it. Dillabough was condemning the rest of the CBC — he was throwing his colleagues under the bus. There was no editorial or comedic reason to cut those three seconds. They were cut for purely political reasons — so as not to embarrass the CBC politically. Which just proves that everything at the CBC — from journalism to “comedy” — is edited with a political eye. But even as they released the full video to Rebel News, the CBC couldn’t help one last act of disinformation — claiming it was “edited for time.” There are only three things you need to know about the CBC: 1. They take $1.5 billion of your tax dollars every year. 2. They hate you. 3. And they lie to you. FIGHT BACK! Sign our petition at

Rebel News

115,865 views • 2 years ago

Hey Canadians 🇨🇦 I just watched Pierre Poilievre’s full Diary of a CEO interview and his breakdown on why so many families can’t afford a home anymore really hit home. He says one simple policy change — slashing the red tape — could fix it almost overnight and get hundreds of thousands more homes built. Here’s the key clip 👇 Have you seen the full episode yet? What part of his housing take stood out most to you? Do you think cutting bureaucracy is the real fix, or is there something else we need? Drop your thoughts below — I’m reading every comment 👇 #Poilievre #CanadaFirst
2:07

Hey Canadians 🇨🇦 I just watched Pierre Poilievre’s full Diary of a CEO interview and his breakdown on why so many families can’t afford a home anymore really hit home. He says one simple policy change — slashing the red tape — could fix it almost overnight and get hundreds of thousands more homes built. Here’s the key clip 👇 Have you seen the full episode yet? What part of his housing take stood out most to you? Do you think cutting bureaucracy is the real fix, or is there something else we need? Drop your thoughts below — I’m reading every comment 👇 #Poilievre #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

35,543 views • 3 months ago