Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

.Feross says the reason we're seeing increased cyberattacks is because the software supply chain is built on blind trust. "Fundamentally, if you really zoom out and ask why this is happening, it's because the whole software supply chain is built on blind trust. You're downloading code from random people... on the internet that you've never met." "You don't know who they are, and you're just like, 'Let's just run it. Let's just hit run, and I hope it's fine. And I'm going to give it full access to my system. No permissions model, no review. No one looks at the code before they run it." "Unlike an iPhone app, where it has to ask for permission to do sensitive things like access your camera, microphone, location, contacts, or your files, open-source packages just get everything."show more

TBPN

350,301 subscribers

15,575 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi describes the difficulties of building a business around open source: "You have to hit two home runs, consecutively." "Your first home run - and you're banking on hitting that home run - is that your open source project takes over the world. Everybody wants to download it." If you don't hit that home run, Ali says, you just shot yourself in the foot. You just gave away your IP and got nothing back for it. But even if you hit this home run, you still don't have a monetizable business. You still can't make any money. So you have to hit the second home run: "You need a 10x innovation on top of the open source. That's the proprietary value you'll provide companies. That's why they'll come to you. Otherwise, they can get the open source anywhere." If you don't hit the second home run, the hyperscalers pick up your open source model, and they offer it for almost-free. "Getting into open source and monetizing is not an easy sport. Preferably don't get into it, because you might get hurt."

Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi describes the difficulties of building a business around open source: "You have to hit two home runs, consecutively." "Your first home run - and you're banking on hitting that home run - is that your open source project takes over the world. Everybody wants to download it." If you don't hit that home run, Ali says, you just shot yourself in the foot. You just gave away your IP and got nothing back for it. But even if you hit this home run, you still don't have a monetizable business. You still can't make any money. So you have to hit the second home run: "You need a 10x innovation on top of the open source. That's the proprietary value you'll provide companies. That's why they'll come to you. Otherwise, they can get the open source anywhere." If you don't hit the second home run, the hyperscalers pick up your open source model, and they offer it for almost-free. "Getting into open source and monetizing is not an easy sport. Preferably don't get into it, because you might get hurt."

TBPN

45,355 views • 8 months ago

like imagine, just click and drag stuff in your app, ask an ai to reimagine it, undo it if you don't like it... and it's actually editing your source files and because it's all flux components its staying on the rails of a well thought out design system

like imagine, just click and drag stuff in your app, ask an ai to reimagine it, undo it if you don't like it... and it's actually editing your source files and because it's all flux components its staying on the rails of a well thought out design system

Caleb Porzio ⚡️

36,524 views • 2 months ago

MrBeast said “if you're trying to be liked, I actually don't recommend you like, help people”. MrBeast: The ironic part is the more I help people, the more shit I get to be honest. Like, it's it's so funny because you know, like, the same day I'll drop a video where I'll, uh, uh, uh, you know, uh, help a thousand blind people see. Some other YouTuber will drop a video where they just bought a new mansion, and it's like everyone's like, "Yes! You know, get that mansion! Good job!" And then they'll be like, "Fuck you for curing blind people, Jimmy. Fuck you, you're using them." I'm like, "No, I just want to inspire people to do good. I mean, I can buy a mansion if you really want me to." So, it is funny. If you're trying, this is a weird sentence, but if you're trying to be liked, I actually don't recommend you like, help people. Like, I actually think helping people will make the internet like you less than if you just like buy nice cars and do like the typical influencer path. It's because they were just so conditioned in America to see it as like a shill, and like no one actually does good because they just find it fun, apparently.

MrBeast said “if you're trying to be liked, I actually don't recommend you like, help people”. MrBeast: The ironic part is the more I help people, the more shit I get to be honest. Like, it's it's so funny because you know, like, the same day I'll drop a video where I'll, uh, uh, uh, you know, uh, help a thousand blind people see. Some other YouTuber will drop a video where they just bought a new mansion, and it's like everyone's like, "Yes! You know, get that mansion! Good job!" And then they'll be like, "Fuck you for curing blind people, Jimmy. Fuck you, you're using them." I'm like, "No, I just want to inspire people to do good. I mean, I can buy a mansion if you really want me to." So, it is funny. If you're trying, this is a weird sentence, but if you're trying to be liked, I actually don't recommend you like, help people. Like, I actually think helping people will make the internet like you less than if you just like buy nice cars and do like the typical influencer path. It's because they were just so conditioned in America to see it as like a shill, and like no one actually does good because they just find it fun, apparently.

Ruzy.hl

57,741 views • 1 month ago

“Our biggest bottleneck is becoming the review of code, rather than the actual writing and generation of code.” Cisco CPO Jeetu Patel says code review is still super important though, because without human taste and judgment, code quickly turns into slop: “Every engineer on that team is now just a spec developer.” “They just build specs. They create markdown files. They give context to the model. They give context to the agent. And then the agent’s writing the code.” “I think, presumably, the review is going to get easier, too.” “You’ll have really crappy software that gets written if people aren’t paying attention to it. It doesn’t obviate the need for having taste, and having judgment, and having instinct, and making sure that you’re thinking about what you’re building."

“Our biggest bottleneck is becoming the review of code, rather than the actual writing and generation of code.” Cisco CPO Jeetu Patel says code review is still super important though, because without human taste and judgment, code quickly turns into slop: “Every engineer on that team is now just a spec developer.” “They just build specs. They create markdown files. They give context to the model. They give context to the agent. And then the agent’s writing the code.” “I think, presumably, the review is going to get easier, too.” “You’ll have really crappy software that gets written if people aren’t paying attention to it. It doesn’t obviate the need for having taste, and having judgment, and having instinct, and making sure that you’re thinking about what you’re building."

TBPN

11,289 views • 6 months ago

Most "agents" are basically interns with API access. They ask you to subscribe to the Times. Download the file. Forward it over. You're not deploying an agent at all. You're managing one. It's why we built Anyway. Anyway is the financial OS for agents that actually operates by itself. Pay, transact, and run your own business, with no babysitter required. Comment "Anyway" to try it out.

Most "agents" are basically interns with API access. They ask you to subscribe to the Times. Download the file. Forward it over. You're not deploying an agent at all. You're managing one. It's why we built Anyway. Anyway is the financial OS for agents that actually operates by itself. Pay, transact, and run your own business, with no babysitter required. Comment "Anyway" to try it out.

Jims

2,049,797 views • 2 months ago

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,361 views • 3 years ago

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

TBPN

384,058 views • 6 months ago

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

TBPN

34,529 views • 5 months ago

CrowdStrike’s Head of Counter Adversary Operations adam_cyber says supply chain attacks have shifted from compromising code to targeting developers directly: "They go after your credentials, phish you, get access to your logins to things like npm and PyPI, and then abuse that." "There are a number of ways they can do this with git tags where they can hide malicious code and redirect Git to a tag." "Axios was downloaded something like 100,000 times per week. That gives you a sense of how frequently these packages are used—and people don’t analyze that code." "They trust it came from npm." "Those packages can be updated at a moment’s notice, and you don’t know what changed unless you review the code yourself."

CrowdStrike’s Head of Counter Adversary Operations adam_cyber says supply chain attacks have shifted from compromising code to targeting developers directly: "They go after your credentials, phish you, get access to your logins to things like npm and PyPI, and then abuse that." "There are a number of ways they can do this with git tags where they can hide malicious code and redirect Git to a tag." "Axios was downloaded something like 100,000 times per week. That gives you a sense of how frequently these packages are used—and people don’t analyze that code." "They trust it came from npm." "Those packages can be updated at a moment’s notice, and you don’t know what changed unless you review the code yourself."

TBPN

19,357 views • 4 months ago

Giving Claude Code access to your codebase doesn't mean giving it access to everything. Deny rules let you draw hard lines. "But now I also want to add a deny rule and I just want to see what happens. So if I want to deny, maybe edit package.json. And now I'm going to still ask Claude to edit it for me." "So I'm just going to actually change this model to haiku because again, this is just a very simple task. So I'm going to like update the version in package.json to one. Now hopefully my permissions were set up correctly and it will be like, can't do that." "Yeah, so it says like, oh, I can't do that. So even if this was a tool call coming from the model, it won't run it. So this is like a great way to add more control over what Claude can and cannot do in your environment."

Giving Claude Code access to your codebase doesn't mean giving it access to everything. Deny rules let you draw hard lines. "But now I also want to add a deny rule and I just want to see what happens. So if I want to deny, maybe edit package.json. And now I'm going to still ask Claude to edit it for me." "So I'm just going to actually change this model to haiku because again, this is just a very simple task. So I'm going to like update the version in package.json to one. Now hopefully my permissions were set up correctly and it will be like, can't do that." "Yeah, so it says like, oh, I can't do that. So even if this was a tool call coming from the model, it won't run it. So this is like a great way to add more control over what Claude can and cannot do in your environment."

Master.dev (Formerly Frontend Masters)

11,351 views • 1 month ago

.Alex Hormozi is super bullish on med spas as a business category. It's squarely within the zeitgeist and is extremely supply-constrained. And people in the industry don't seem to know it. "There's this aging population that has more money than anyone else. They don't want to age. They see the Bryan Johnsons — it is the zeitgeist of right now. 'I want to live forever, I want to look young forever.' And they have all the money. So the demand side of that is huge." "If you look at the supply, med spas are still wildly understaffed. And I know this because I see the business owners every week." "Bryan Johnson had 1,000 people apply to his $1M/year thing. Do that math. And there was a $60,000/year thing underneath that... wildly underestimated." "It's super fragmented. No one has really gobbled it up well, that I've seen... They're in a completely supply-constrained environment, they just don't know it."

.Alex Hormozi is super bullish on med spas as a business category. It's squarely within the zeitgeist and is extremely supply-constrained. And people in the industry don't seem to know it. "There's this aging population that has more money than anyone else. They don't want to age. They see the Bryan Johnsons — it is the zeitgeist of right now. 'I want to live forever, I want to look young forever.' And they have all the money. So the demand side of that is huge." "If you look at the supply, med spas are still wildly understaffed. And I know this because I see the business owners every week." "Bryan Johnson had 1,000 people apply to his $1M/year thing. Do that math. And there was a $60,000/year thing underneath that... wildly underestimated." "It's super fragmented. No one has really gobbled it up well, that I've seen... They're in a completely supply-constrained environment, they just don't know it."

TBPN

206,208 views • 1 month ago

"We treat software like it is so precious. And in the new world we're going to, it's going to be much more fungible. But that's the good news." Garry Tan on where the moats will be for future YC companies: "That's where taste, agency, and trust matter a lot. This is something that's only crystallized recently. We've been talking about agency and taste for the longest time. Agency is being able to prompt, and taste is being able to do evals." "Trust is the third thing. It's probably the most important. When you have an enterprise company that is selling to real businesses that are relying on you — that's your moat. Your moat is actually trust. They went through the effort to try you, get you onboarded, and incorporate you into how they work."

"We treat software like it is so precious. And in the new world we're going to, it's going to be much more fungible. But that's the good news." Garry Tan on where the moats will be for future YC companies: "That's where taste, agency, and trust matter a lot. This is something that's only crystallized recently. We've been talking about agency and taste for the longest time. Agency is being able to prompt, and taste is being able to do evals." "Trust is the third thing. It's probably the most important. When you have an enterprise company that is selling to real businesses that are relying on you — that's your moat. Your moat is actually trust. They went through the effort to try you, get you onboarded, and incorporate you into how they work."

TBPN

43,619 views • 4 months ago

"It's very much a one-size-fits-all solution. When you're building a mobile app you build it for Android and iOS, we're building it for EVM and for SVM" Rand, founder of Zama, on why core infrastructure has to be cross-chain from the start "There's a version for EVM that works with any EVM chain, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Binance, and then there's a Solana version for SVM. The protocol is designed to be cross-chain on day one. There isn't going to be a different version on every chain, there's just going to be one encryption layer" "You've got confidential assets, shielded USDC on Ethereum, and you can move it shielded to Polygon and Solana. It solves the interoperability issues, even of transactions and bridges, just by using the layer" "Whenever you're building core infrastructure today, you have to build it cross-chain by design. Liquidity is fragmented, people have money on Solana, they have money on Ethereum. Just because you're doing it confidentially shouldn't mean you have worse access than someone using blockchain today. The baseline is what people have today, on top of which we add confidentiality. We cannot make things worse than they are, otherwise people are just not going to use it"

"It's very much a one-size-fits-all solution. When you're building a mobile app you build it for Android and iOS, we're building it for EVM and for SVM" Rand, founder of Zama, on why core infrastructure has to be cross-chain from the start "There's a version for EVM that works with any EVM chain, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Binance, and then there's a Solana version for SVM. The protocol is designed to be cross-chain on day one. There isn't going to be a different version on every chain, there's just going to be one encryption layer" "You've got confidential assets, shielded USDC on Ethereum, and you can move it shielded to Polygon and Solana. It solves the interoperability issues, even of transactions and bridges, just by using the layer" "Whenever you're building core infrastructure today, you have to build it cross-chain by design. Liquidity is fragmented, people have money on Solana, they have money on Ethereum. Just because you're doing it confidentially shouldn't mean you have worse access than someone using blockchain today. The baseline is what people have today, on top of which we add confidentiality. We cannot make things worse than they are, otherwise people are just not going to use it"

The Wolf Of All Streets

33,692 views • 28 days ago

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Kevin Tanaka

10,256 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇸 GOV. NEWSOM’S SON WAS A FAN OF CHARLIE KIRK?! "Last night, trying to put my son to bed. He's like, 'no dad, what time is Charlie gonna be here?' And the point is which is you are making a damn dent. I mean, it's the reason you're here because I think people need to understand your success, your influence. What you've been up to and the fact that you're on these college campus doors. And to your point, you just open up. I mean, you're like: ask me anything, challenge me." Source: jeremyreporter

🇺🇸 GOV. NEWSOM’S SON WAS A FAN OF CHARLIE KIRK?! "Last night, trying to put my son to bed. He's like, 'no dad, what time is Charlie gonna be here?' And the point is which is you are making a damn dent. I mean, it's the reason you're here because I think people need to understand your success, your influence. What you've been up to and the fact that you're on these college campus doors. And to your point, you just open up. I mean, you're like: ask me anything, challenge me." Source: jeremyreporter

Mario Nawfal

121,169 views • 11 months ago

TraderMayne reveals what really happens after you sell your company "I made more money selling this company than I ever made trading, and I consider myself having done pretty well trading crypto over these years. My performance coach told me right before the deal closed, you're gonna have probably 48 hours where you're on cloud nine. That's it. I'm like that's it? I'm on my honeymoon in Italy when the wire hit. I showed my wife, signed out, signed back in, signed out again, I was refreshing it, screenshotting it. For 48 hours it was the highest of highs. I don't even think about it anymore. Life just goes on." "Once you do it you realize it's possible, and you just want to do it again and again. Winners love to win. But it's also frustrating because you learn that there is no end state for people like us. The reason you can't quit is the reason you're able to do what you do today."

TraderMayne reveals what really happens after you sell your company "I made more money selling this company than I ever made trading, and I consider myself having done pretty well trading crypto over these years. My performance coach told me right before the deal closed, you're gonna have probably 48 hours where you're on cloud nine. That's it. I'm like that's it? I'm on my honeymoon in Italy when the wire hit. I showed my wife, signed out, signed back in, signed out again, I was refreshing it, screenshotting it. For 48 hours it was the highest of highs. I don't even think about it anymore. Life just goes on." "Once you do it you realize it's possible, and you just want to do it again and again. Winners love to win. But it's also frustrating because you learn that there is no end state for people like us. The reason you can't quit is the reason you're able to do what you do today."

Kai

101,513 views • 3 days ago

Zendaya and Robert Pattinson can't agree on whether honesty is good in a relationship Zendaya: "I'm honest, if I don't like something, I'll tell you that I don't like it. You don't want someone to tell you that they don't like it?" Robert: "Actually, no, I don't. If I'm coming in and saying do you like it, really I just want you to agree with me" "So you just gotta say, yeah, cool, you look great. Also why does it matter?" Zendaya: "I want an honest opinion" Robert: "And if they say no and you go, well I like it so I'm gonna go out anyway, it's not great vibes afterwards" Zendaya: "Yeah, but then don't ask for the opinion" Robert: "That's the thing, you just shouldn't ask. Communication is not key"

Zendaya and Robert Pattinson can't agree on whether honesty is good in a relationship Zendaya: "I'm honest, if I don't like something, I'll tell you that I don't like it. You don't want someone to tell you that they don't like it?" Robert: "Actually, no, I don't. If I'm coming in and saying do you like it, really I just want you to agree with me" "So you just gotta say, yeah, cool, you look great. Also why does it matter?" Zendaya: "I want an honest opinion" Robert: "And if they say no and you go, well I like it so I'm gonna go out anyway, it's not great vibes afterwards" Zendaya: "Yeah, but then don't ask for the opinion" Robert: "That's the thing, you just shouldn't ask. Communication is not key"

sara

1,730,289 views • 1 month ago

Sequoia's Dean Meyer: "If distillation is real, the question is, how do we address the asymmetry?" "Western companies aren't going to set up 35,000 proxy accounts to steal from Anthropic." "There *is* a structural asymmetry, and it's something we have to think about." "The gap between closed and open source has closed a lot." "And the key conversation online, over the past week, was distillation the reason for this? Or is there some other, mysterious reason?" "The truth is, from the conversations we've had, is that it's somewhere in the middle." "Whether it's 20% or 40%, it doesn't really matter as much. But it's meaningful that we know it's happening." "We know from the labs that there's 10s of millions of queries through these large-scale proxy distillation accounts." "We also know, if you speak to anyone who's leading in synthetic data gen on pre- or post-training at the labs, they will tell you that even if you do hardcore KYC, and then just get access to the output (let's assume you just get the output from the prompt), it is still extremely valuable." "That is 100% true. We know distillation is real."

Sequoia's Dean Meyer: "If distillation is real, the question is, how do we address the asymmetry?" "Western companies aren't going to set up 35,000 proxy accounts to steal from Anthropic." "There is a structural asymmetry, and it's something we have to think about." "The gap between closed and open source has closed a lot." "And the key conversation online, over the past week, was distillation the reason for this? Or is there some other, mysterious reason?" "The truth is, from the conversations we've had, is that it's somewhere in the middle." "Whether it's 20% or 40%, it doesn't really matter as much. But it's meaningful that we know it's happening." "We know from the labs that there's 10s of millions of queries through these large-scale proxy distillation accounts." "We also know, if you speak to anyone who's leading in synthetic data gen on pre- or post-training at the labs, they will tell you that even if you do hardcore KYC, and then just get access to the output (let's assume you just get the output from the prompt), it is still extremely valuable." "That is 100% true. We know distillation is real."

TBPN

43,027 views • 19 days ago