正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Ferris State Co-DC/LB Coach Grant Caserta - Block Destruction Drill Work - Slip - Slip Choice - Double Slip - Dent to Long Arm - Shed (2 Whitsle) - Shed Sequence - Shed w/ RB

JamesALight's profile picture

James Light

80,715 subscribers

12,754 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Texas DB Coach Blake Gideon - Shock & Shed Drill (Block Destruction) - Lock Out & Snatch - Rip Thru - Arm Over
8:35

Texas DB Coach Blake Gideon - Shock & Shed Drill (Block Destruction) - Lock Out & Snatch - Rip Thru - Arm Over

James Light

17,560 次观看 • 4 个月前

Ferris State LBs Coach Grant Caserta - Building a Drill Menu - Stance & Footwork - Key Recognition & RB ID - Zone Drops/Man Coverage - Block Destruction - Tackling - Takeaways - Ball Drills - Fun - Blitzing & Pass Rush - Prepractice - Pregame
5:06

Ferris State LBs Coach Grant Caserta - Building a Drill Menu - Stance & Footwork - Key Recognition & RB ID - Zone Drops/Man Coverage - Block Destruction - Tackling - Takeaways - Ball Drills - Fun - Blitzing & Pass Rush - Prepractice - Pregame

James Light

41,026 次观看 • 1 年前

Ferris State Co-DC/LB Coach Grant Caserta - Tackling Drills - Sideline 1v1 - 6 Cone Box - 6 Cone Box (Circle) - 3 Way Drop & Leverage - Run Swoop - Engaged Tackle - Gator Roll - Ring Tackle - Roll/Reroll
11:11

Ferris State Co-DC/LB Coach Grant Caserta - Tackling Drills - Sideline 1v1 - 6 Cone Box - 6 Cone Box (Circle) - 3 Way Drop & Leverage - Run Swoop - Engaged Tackle - Gator Roll - Ring Tackle - Roll/Reroll

James Light

18,626 次观看 • 5 个月前

Arizona State LB Coach AJ Cooper - Block Destruction (Mid Zone) / Chop & Longarm - Block Destruction used to get over the top of Mid Zone blocks - 2 Cross over steps to gain our leverage on the OL trying to cut us off - Chop coaching points: trying to break the arm of the OL - Long Arm coaching points: Hit with a slight bend in the elbow like Hit & Shed, strongest point of the bench press.
7:01

Arizona State LB Coach AJ Cooper - Block Destruction (Mid Zone) / Chop & Longarm - Block Destruction used to get over the top of Mid Zone blocks - 2 Cross over steps to gain our leverage on the OL trying to cut us off - Chop coaching points: trying to break the arm of the OL - Long Arm coaching points: Hit with a slight bend in the elbow like Hit & Shed, strongest point of the bench press.

James Light

12,764 次观看 • 7 个月前

Navy DC PJ Volker - Shimmy Drill (Tackling Approach) - Work downhill & start shimmy 1 1/2 yards away from ball carrier. - Square to the man - Near leg forward - Constantly gaining ground - Incorporate strike-shed to drill
4:36

Navy DC PJ Volker - Shimmy Drill (Tackling Approach) - Work downhill & start shimmy 1 1/2 yards away from ball carrier. - Square to the man - Near leg forward - Constantly gaining ground - Incorporate strike-shed to drill

James Light

31,772 次观看 • 8 个月前

DB Block Destruction Turnover Drill - Working to incorporate several facets in the drill - Block destruction, then scoop and score or strip attempts - Stalk block - strike shed, keep hands inside - If the hands are outside, the DB will lose more times than not - Most receivers don't want to block - The more aggressive you can be, the better off you are Andy LaRussa, Asst Head Coach, Western Kentucky Andy LaRussa #GlazierClinics
1:21

DB Block Destruction Turnover Drill - Working to incorporate several facets in the drill - Block destruction, then scoop and score or strip attempts - Stalk block - strike shed, keep hands inside - If the hands are outside, the DB will lose more times than not - Most receivers don't want to block - The more aggressive you can be, the better off you are Andy LaRussa, Asst Head Coach, Western Kentucky Andy LaRussa #GlazierClinics

Glazier Clinics

10,996 次观看 • 8 个月前

LB Scrape Spill Tackle Drill - The scrape spill drill integrates movement skills, block destruction, and tackling into a single exercise. - Linebackers should maintain a downhill path with square shoulders while staying tight to the double team pole. - Proper hand placement for the spill technique requires one hand on the blocker's sternum and the other on the outside of the shoulder pad. - Players must plant their outside foot in the ground to quickly redirect and get back vertical toward the ball carrier. - Coaches should emphasize keeping the eyes up during contact to ensure players see what they are hitting rather than ducking their heads. - The ultimate goal of the drill is to avoid going one-for-one by being violent enough to shed the pulling blocker and make the tackle. PJ Volker, Safeties Coach, Baltimore Ravens PJ Volker #GlazierClinics
2:31

LB Scrape Spill Tackle Drill - The scrape spill drill integrates movement skills, block destruction, and tackling into a single exercise. - Linebackers should maintain a downhill path with square shoulders while staying tight to the double team pole. - Proper hand placement for the spill technique requires one hand on the blocker's sternum and the other on the outside of the shoulder pad. - Players must plant their outside foot in the ground to quickly redirect and get back vertical toward the ball carrier. - Coaches should emphasize keeping the eyes up during contact to ensure players see what they are hitting rather than ducking their heads. - The ultimate goal of the drill is to avoid going one-for-one by being violent enough to shed the pulling blocker and make the tackle. PJ Volker, Safeties Coach, Baltimore Ravens PJ Volker #GlazierClinics

Glazier Clinics

15,921 次观看 • 5 个月前

D-Line Press to Scoop Drill - The press to scoop drill is designed for defensive linemen to handle situations where they encounter a double team combo or a zone block. - When positioned on the backside of a play, the player must work to press the scoop as flat as possible against the line of scrimmage. - It is critical to get hands on the offensive player to prevent them from getting a free release to the second level of the defense. - Players are coached to keep their inside arm long, strong, and fully locked out while adjusting their position during the play. - To maintain power and leverage, the defensive lineman should work to get their inside leg up, utilizing a same hand and same foot technique. - If two blockers remain on the defensive lineman, another defender is free; once one blocker leaves, the lineman must be prepared to come off the block and make the play. Vontrell King-Williams, D-Line Coach, Auburn Coach V. King-Williams #glazierclinics
1:40

D-Line Press to Scoop Drill - The press to scoop drill is designed for defensive linemen to handle situations where they encounter a double team combo or a zone block. - When positioned on the backside of a play, the player must work to press the scoop as flat as possible against the line of scrimmage. - It is critical to get hands on the offensive player to prevent them from getting a free release to the second level of the defense. - Players are coached to keep their inside arm long, strong, and fully locked out while adjusting their position during the play. - To maintain power and leverage, the defensive lineman should work to get their inside leg up, utilizing a same hand and same foot technique. - If two blockers remain on the defensive lineman, another defender is free; once one blocker leaves, the lineman must be prepared to come off the block and make the play. Vontrell King-Williams, D-Line Coach, Auburn Coach V. King-Williams #glazierclinics

Glazier Clinics

11,685 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🚨TRANSFER PORTAL🚨🚨 Christian Thomas | 6’3” 230 lbs (LB) ONE YEAR of eligibility. Christian Thomas is a downhill, sideline-to-sideline enforcer out of Maine who brings size, production, and presence to the heart of a defense. At 6’3”, 230, he’s a physical, instinctive linebacker with a nose for the football and the toughness to anchor any unit. 2024 Production: 63 Tackles | 6.0 TFLs | 1.5 Sacks | 2 Double-Digit Tackle Games A consistent disruptor and vocal leader, Thomas plays with urgency and brings juice on every snap. He’s shown the ability to stack and shed, shoot gaps, and finish plays in space. Built to command a front seven — and he’s only scratching the surface. High motor. High IQ. High upside. Battle-tested and ready to elevate. Let’s work. #Tier1Recruiting #TransferPortal
2:53

🚨🚨TRANSFER PORTAL🚨🚨 Christian Thomas | 6’3” 230 lbs (LB) ONE YEAR of eligibility. Christian Thomas is a downhill, sideline-to-sideline enforcer out of Maine who brings size, production, and presence to the heart of a defense. At 6’3”, 230, he’s a physical, instinctive linebacker with a nose for the football and the toughness to anchor any unit. 2024 Production: 63 Tackles | 6.0 TFLs | 1.5 Sacks | 2 Double-Digit Tackle Games A consistent disruptor and vocal leader, Thomas plays with urgency and brings juice on every snap. He’s shown the ability to stack and shed, shoot gaps, and finish plays in space. Built to command a front seven — and he’s only scratching the surface. High motor. High IQ. High upside. Battle-tested and ready to elevate. Let’s work. #Tier1Recruiting #TransferPortal

Tier1Recruiting

29,124 次观看 • 1 年前

The Saints consistently attacked the Ravens' early down offense with boundary or open-side vertical pressures (Orton). In Clip 1, New Orleans attacks the open A-gap with tempo. Kaden Elliss is able to slip past the RG's block and secure the tackle before Derrick Henry can get momentum. The pressure also allows the Edge to climb, forcing a "give" read and funneling the play to the pressure. In Clip 2, the pressure again attacks the open-side, but this time against an under-center play-action. Lamar is blind to the pressure, and the five-man front in Base (3-4) creates man blocking. The RB is responsible for the play fake and blocking the LB. For Baltimore, the RG "posts" the Nose, which makes him late picking up the 5t. Elliss again makes a play in the backfield off the same pressure path. Learn how to build an early down pressure system, only on MatchQuarters: --
0:24

The Saints consistently attacked the Ravens' early down offense with boundary or open-side vertical pressures (Orton). In Clip 1, New Orleans attacks the open A-gap with tempo. Kaden Elliss is able to slip past the RG's block and secure the tackle before Derrick Henry can get momentum. The pressure also allows the Edge to climb, forcing a "give" read and funneling the play to the pressure. In Clip 2, the pressure again attacks the open-side, but this time against an under-center play-action. Lamar is blind to the pressure, and the five-man front in Base (3-4) creates man blocking. The RB is responsible for the play fake and blocking the LB. For Baltimore, the RG "posts" the Nose, which makes him late picking up the 5t. Elliss again makes a play in the backfield off the same pressure path. Learn how to build an early down pressure system, only on MatchQuarters: --

Cody Alexander

136,497 次观看 • 13 天前

🚨🚨🚨HOLY MOLY!! Today, the CDC's ACIP Committee officially acknowledged long-known uncertainties about COVID mRNA vaccines, exposing four critical risk areas in a stunning session! 1/ Immune chaos: Shots trigger IgG4 "tolerance" antibodies after 2-3 doses, weakening virus fight & possibly aiding tumors. Cytokines stay inflamed for months; T-cells get imbalanced, risking more infections. Long-term? Unknown—boosters could wreck defenses. 2/ Not just your arm: mRNA spreads to liver, heart, brain, testes—crosses blood-brain barrier. Persists weeks to 2 YEARS! Spike protein everywhere explains myocarditis, brain fog, fertility fears. Companies used fake stand-ins in tests—sloppy! 3/ Frameshifting glitch: Fake uridine causes ribosomes to "slip," making wrong proteins (up to 10x more). These trigger immune hits, but are they toxic? Cancer-promoting? No studies—pure roulette. 4/ DNA dirt: Vials contaminated w/ plasmid DNA exceeding FDA limits, Pfizer has cancer-linked SV40 bits. Lipids sneak it into cells/nuclei—could integrate genes, cause persistent spike or tumors. 48+ cancer case reports post-vax, incl. aggressive pancreatic/colorectal.
13:58

🚨🚨🚨HOLY MOLY!! Today, the CDC's ACIP Committee officially acknowledged long-known uncertainties about COVID mRNA vaccines, exposing four critical risk areas in a stunning session! 1/ Immune chaos: Shots trigger IgG4 "tolerance" antibodies after 2-3 doses, weakening virus fight & possibly aiding tumors. Cytokines stay inflamed for months; T-cells get imbalanced, risking more infections. Long-term? Unknown—boosters could wreck defenses. 2/ Not just your arm: mRNA spreads to liver, heart, brain, testes—crosses blood-brain barrier. Persists weeks to 2 YEARS! Spike protein everywhere explains myocarditis, brain fog, fertility fears. Companies used fake stand-ins in tests—sloppy! 3/ Frameshifting glitch: Fake uridine causes ribosomes to "slip," making wrong proteins (up to 10x more). These trigger immune hits, but are they toxic? Cancer-promoting? No studies—pure roulette. 4/ DNA dirt: Vials contaminated w/ plasmid DNA exceeding FDA limits, Pfizer has cancer-linked SV40 bits. Lipids sneak it into cells/nuclei—could integrate genes, cause persistent spike or tumors. 48+ cancer case reports post-vax, incl. aggressive pancreatic/colorectal.

aussie17

291,664 次观看 • 1 年前

Seriously : Luxon needs the chop. He’s let slip in some extended Q+A footage his ‘great economic plan’ ahead of his upcoming state of the nation speech… and it SUCKS dogs balls. Luxon is about to announce a plan to ‘wire’ international funds giant such as Blackrock (the company who owns the world) with Iwi to build electronically monitored road tolls, housing and other projects throughout the country. What could possibly go wrong? imagine that unholy union, no doubt he’s putting together a deal with Iwi involved to ensure their co-operation of the sell off of our country. He acknowledges that NZFirst is the only block for this at the moment. His second big idea is having Shane Reti work with pumping up our marvellous University’s and working with our ‘fantastic’ scientists to build business, you know like the ones who fuse critical race and Trans ideology into science? The ones the Govt funds millions to rub Kauri trees with whale oil and play the trees music? Matauranga Māori given prominence in NZ education has made us the laughing stock of the world, our tertiary sector has rejected modern proven globally embraced science for Stone Age mythology and hocus pocus. We need a complete overhaul of tertiary sectors and leftist madness BINNED. Our future is in economic Nationalism that needs to be unleashed by dumping the Climate bullshit, and not throwing our independence to huge multinationals, have a look at Blackrock’s track record, they strip assets and rinse their host country and then leave, as Winston Peters said about Blackrock “ they ain’t Santa Claus, we can do this ourselves”.
1:50

Seriously : Luxon needs the chop. He’s let slip in some extended Q+A footage his ‘great economic plan’ ahead of his upcoming state of the nation speech… and it SUCKS dogs balls. Luxon is about to announce a plan to ‘wire’ international funds giant such as Blackrock (the company who owns the world) with Iwi to build electronically monitored road tolls, housing and other projects throughout the country. What could possibly go wrong? imagine that unholy union, no doubt he’s putting together a deal with Iwi involved to ensure their co-operation of the sell off of our country. He acknowledges that NZFirst is the only block for this at the moment. His second big idea is having Shane Reti work with pumping up our marvellous University’s and working with our ‘fantastic’ scientists to build business, you know like the ones who fuse critical race and Trans ideology into science? The ones the Govt funds millions to rub Kauri trees with whale oil and play the trees music? Matauranga Māori given prominence in NZ education has made us the laughing stock of the world, our tertiary sector has rejected modern proven globally embraced science for Stone Age mythology and hocus pocus. We need a complete overhaul of tertiary sectors and leftist madness BINNED. Our future is in economic Nationalism that needs to be unleashed by dumping the Climate bullshit, and not throwing our independence to huge multinationals, have a look at Blackrock’s track record, they strip assets and rinse their host country and then leave, as Winston Peters said about Blackrock “ they ain’t Santa Claus, we can do this ourselves”.

Holyhekatuiteka

13,957 次观看 • 1 年前

Breaking News: Trump administration orders green card applicants to leave the US, apply from their home countries (Full News Report) According to fox news U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on Friday a major shift in immigration policy, dictating that noncitizens in the U.S. who have applied for a green card, or lawful permanent resident status, must leave the country indefinitely — even if they are in the country legally and regardless of whether they have spouses or children with citizenship. Green card petitioners will then be required to wait for their application to be processed outside the country through consular processing via the U.S. Department of State. USCIS said it will grant "adjustment of status" only in extraordinary circumstances, on a case-by-case basis. The Trump administration's position remains that when noncitizens travel into the country via student visas, tourist visas or temporary work status, they are supposed to leave once that term expires and that temporary permission to be in the U.S. should not serve as the first step toward getting a green card. Officials claim the policy reflects the original intentions of the law, though lawsuits and litigation are expected to follow. "We’re returning to the original intent of the law to ensure aliens navigate our nation’s immigration system properly," USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler wrote in a statement. "From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a green card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances. This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes. Kahler added that when noncitizens apply for a green card from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who "decide to slip into the shadows" and remain in the U.S. illegally after being denied residency. "Nonimmigrants, like students, temporary workers or people on tourist visas, come to the U.S. for a short time and for a specific purpose," he said. "Our system is designed for them to leave when their visit is over. Their visit should not function as the first step in the green card process "Following the law allows the majority of these cases to be handled by the State Department at U.S. consular offices abroad and frees up limited USCIS resources to focus on processing other cases that fall under its purview, including visas for victims of violent crime and human trafficking, naturalization applications and other priorities," Kahler added. "The law was written this way for a reason, and despite the fact that it has been ignored for years, following it will help make our system fairer and more efficient." Critics of the policy shift argue many overstays have U.S. citizen spouses or children, pay taxes and fill labor shortages and, if removed from the country, will face long processing delays and humanitarian concerns. It is unclear if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will begin deporting green card applicants.
0:26

Breaking News: Trump administration orders green card applicants to leave the US, apply from their home countries (Full News Report) According to fox news U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on Friday a major shift in immigration policy, dictating that noncitizens in the U.S. who have applied for a green card, or lawful permanent resident status, must leave the country indefinitely — even if they are in the country legally and regardless of whether they have spouses or children with citizenship. Green card petitioners will then be required to wait for their application to be processed outside the country through consular processing via the U.S. Department of State. USCIS said it will grant "adjustment of status" only in extraordinary circumstances, on a case-by-case basis. The Trump administration's position remains that when noncitizens travel into the country via student visas, tourist visas or temporary work status, they are supposed to leave once that term expires and that temporary permission to be in the U.S. should not serve as the first step toward getting a green card. Officials claim the policy reflects the original intentions of the law, though lawsuits and litigation are expected to follow. "We’re returning to the original intent of the law to ensure aliens navigate our nation’s immigration system properly," USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler wrote in a statement. "From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a green card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances. This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes. Kahler added that when noncitizens apply for a green card from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who "decide to slip into the shadows" and remain in the U.S. illegally after being denied residency. "Nonimmigrants, like students, temporary workers or people on tourist visas, come to the U.S. for a short time and for a specific purpose," he said. "Our system is designed for them to leave when their visit is over. Their visit should not function as the first step in the green card process "Following the law allows the majority of these cases to be handled by the State Department at U.S. consular offices abroad and frees up limited USCIS resources to focus on processing other cases that fall under its purview, including visas for victims of violent crime and human trafficking, naturalization applications and other priorities," Kahler added. "The law was written this way for a reason, and despite the fact that it has been ignored for years, following it will help make our system fairer and more efficient." Critics of the policy shift argue many overstays have U.S. citizen spouses or children, pay taxes and fill labor shortages and, if removed from the country, will face long processing delays and humanitarian concerns. It is unclear if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will begin deporting green card applicants.

Gossip Mill Nigeria

19,425 次观看 • 4 个月前

‼️🙏DOUBLE SCRIPT ➕ THE MANIPULATION BEHIND THE DEATH "MY JOURNEY OF SELF INVESTIGATION"🌸 💁‍♀️Right in the first post of "RED STAR NEWS", it is clear that the murder was staged - Papaprazzi reporter of "RED STAR NEWS" (No 2 time fall but 2 scenes in a staging.) 🙏➕➕ (I'm not sure whether the account "Red Star News" works for capitalists, the state, the party, or if they are truly just reporting news. A witness walking their dog and found, it was not correct. The first person to discover it was a janitor. And this issue is still in doubt.) ❗️The video and photo released on September 11 include: ( Happened and filmed after.) 1. A shadow inside YML's room, which was just the police investigating the scene + the iron window fully opened (a drunk person could not have opened that iron grille, it's very difficult to open). 2.Analysis (the photo of clothes - blue T-shirt, white long pants) 👕👖 - On September 11, reporters captured the scene of (1) blue T-shirt and white pants hanging out to dry, which matches the photo circulating online showing YML after the "second fall" and passing away. - Therefore, my observation is that the person lying there is indeed Yu Menglong (in my view, he died during torture, there was no suicide, he only died after the surgery to remove the USB. This is the first staged scene). (❗️The rumor they released in writing is true. The plan involved two time killings, "two time falls from the building", so indeed it happened twice.) Like two falls, two tortures, two stagings. The same thing, this is how the perpetrators want us to be messed up.) - Then, on September 11, there was a photo of (2) digging up the grass on the ground. Very strange. Previously said he was tortured, thrown there and still breathing. (That's a rumor.) ‼️👉Therefore, conversely, this is actually the final crime scene when they (the police) secretly took Yu Menglong away. - He was tortured to retrieve the USB, and the staged suicide was planned twice, which confused the paparazzi between real and fake. - He was murdered after brutal torture and thrown onto the "dug-up ground", with the staff there doing it to fabricate a fake crime scene. 👉 And based on reasoning about the final sequence of events: (unprocessed crime scene) 1. They placed his body below the 5th floor and claimed it was a suicide. It was a staged scene. The police must have taken photos at the actual crime scene. There will always be an original, untouched crime scene. 2. He was lying on the dug-up ground and secretly taken away by the police, after which the police concluded it was a fall, a slip, or an accident… without any video recording. 👉 the possibility of number 2 is higher, because they conclude quickly. When Yu Menglong's body is no longer intact. While at the crime scene, there were also two characters sitting near the police, Jin Quang and Xin Qi or (Cheng) ‼️️ 👉This is definitely a murder attempt in which the police are the ones who hide the crime. If you want the community to stop analyzing and speculating, show us the conclusion of the case. There is no infor autopsy, what else? (✅) THANK YOU "RED STAR NEWS"🙂 Note: Analysis based on the video of red star news on September 11 at the scene. Note: Refer to the timeline below. 👇 ❗️In short: I mean that some things have been messed up by some, but in general it still follows a certain direction and a result. - Torture - take usb - murder -> Staging, staging 2 times (pull the body to the scene) 👉 Anyway, it still only comes to one result. ( Analysis of : 미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼 Remember to write the source when take it out ) #于朦朧墜樓事件 #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #于朦胧坠楼 #YuMenglong #于朦胧 #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglong于朦胧 #于朦胧
1:10

‼️🙏DOUBLE SCRIPT ➕ THE MANIPULATION BEHIND THE DEATH "MY JOURNEY OF SELF INVESTIGATION"🌸 💁‍♀️Right in the first post of "RED STAR NEWS", it is clear that the murder was staged - Papaprazzi reporter of "RED STAR NEWS" (No 2 time fall but 2 scenes in a staging.) 🙏➕➕ (I'm not sure whether the account "Red Star News" works for capitalists, the state, the party, or if they are truly just reporting news. A witness walking their dog and found, it was not correct. The first person to discover it was a janitor. And this issue is still in doubt.) ❗️The video and photo released on September 11 include: ( Happened and filmed after.) 1. A shadow inside YML's room, which was just the police investigating the scene + the iron window fully opened (a drunk person could not have opened that iron grille, it's very difficult to open). 2.Analysis (the photo of clothes - blue T-shirt, white long pants) 👕👖 - On September 11, reporters captured the scene of (1) blue T-shirt and white pants hanging out to dry, which matches the photo circulating online showing YML after the "second fall" and passing away. - Therefore, my observation is that the person lying there is indeed Yu Menglong (in my view, he died during torture, there was no suicide, he only died after the surgery to remove the USB. This is the first staged scene). (❗️The rumor they released in writing is true. The plan involved two time killings, "two time falls from the building", so indeed it happened twice.) Like two falls, two tortures, two stagings. The same thing, this is how the perpetrators want us to be messed up.) - Then, on September 11, there was a photo of (2) digging up the grass on the ground. Very strange. Previously said he was tortured, thrown there and still breathing. (That's a rumor.) ‼️👉Therefore, conversely, this is actually the final crime scene when they (the police) secretly took Yu Menglong away. - He was tortured to retrieve the USB, and the staged suicide was planned twice, which confused the paparazzi between real and fake. - He was murdered after brutal torture and thrown onto the "dug-up ground", with the staff there doing it to fabricate a fake crime scene. 👉 And based on reasoning about the final sequence of events: (unprocessed crime scene) 1. They placed his body below the 5th floor and claimed it was a suicide. It was a staged scene. The police must have taken photos at the actual crime scene. There will always be an original, untouched crime scene. 2. He was lying on the dug-up ground and secretly taken away by the police, after which the police concluded it was a fall, a slip, or an accident… without any video recording. 👉 the possibility of number 2 is higher, because they conclude quickly. When Yu Menglong's body is no longer intact. While at the crime scene, there were also two characters sitting near the police, Jin Quang and Xin Qi or (Cheng) ‼️️ 👉This is definitely a murder attempt in which the police are the ones who hide the crime. If you want the community to stop analyzing and speculating, show us the conclusion of the case. There is no infor autopsy, what else? (✅) THANK YOU "RED STAR NEWS"🙂 Note: Analysis based on the video of red star news on September 11 at the scene. Note: Refer to the timeline below. 👇 ❗️In short: I mean that some things have been messed up by some, but in general it still follows a certain direction and a result. - Torture - take usb - murder -> Staging, staging 2 times (pull the body to the scene) 👉 Anyway, it still only comes to one result. ( Analysis of : 미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼 Remember to write the source when take it out ) #于朦朧墜樓事件 #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #于朦胧坠楼 #YuMenglong #于朦胧 #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglong于朦胧 #于朦胧

미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼

129,573 次观看 • 1 年前

After a lot of consideration, I have decided I will vote Liberal and for Mark Carney on Monday. I think the Conservatives ran a great campaign and Pierre Poilievre would lead Canada well. That said, I want to explain the deciding factors for my vote — since I know many Conservatives follow me too. - - - 🇨🇦 - - - Despite the partisanship you often see online, I believe both major parties put forward decent if imperfect platforms this election. For all the hand-wringing, there is consensus in Canada for moving in the right direction — on project permitting, natural resource development, tying immigration to infrastructure, interprovincial trade barriers, housing supply reforms, and maintaining strong public finances. Neither platform puts our AAA credit rating at risk. Our pension system remains one of the strongest globally. We aren’t facing the kind of unfunded obligations weighing down many peer countries. We’re still a fortunate country — and our politics are healthier (federally) than we often give them credit for. - - - 🇨🇦 - - - That said, here is why I ultimately decided to vote Liberal. 1) CANDIDATES There are several Liberal candidates I would like to see become MPs: Karim Bardeesy Vince Gasparro and Chi Nguyen just to name a few. 2) HOUSING While I don’t know who will be in Cabinet, my hope is that Nate Erskine-Smith stays on as Housing Minister. We don’t always agree, but from my candid conversations with him, I know how well he understands this issue. I believe there is a genuine will inside the Liberal Party to push hard for real supply reform. Programs like the Housing Accelerator Fund are imperfect, but still good overall. MURB, GST/DC promises, Build Canada etc all good! 3) STATE CAPACITY Conservatives are rightly skeptical of government bloat — but I don’t see the same urgency from them about making government work better. I think the Liberals have more interest to do this. I want to see new agencies like Build Homes Canada not just announced but executed well. 4) CLIMATE The Conservatives offer no real climate plan beyond exporting LNG — and too often slip into mocking anyone who cares about environmental issues. I want to see pipelines built and energy exported — but I also want serious investment in electrification, adaptation, and decarbonization. Canada is one of the countries best positioned to thrive if we take climate adaptation seriously. I don’t want us to waste that advantage. 5) CITIES The Conservatives are not an urban party. Many of their MPs are outright hostile to Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal — and to the people who live in them in rhetoric. In day-to-day governing, I believe cities would be a lower priority under a Conservative government. I live in downtown Toronto. 6) OTHER ITEMS I want to see the CBC reformed, not abolished. I want HSR to Windsor. I think Mark Carney will be able to respond better to a serious economic shock. I think the Liberal plan to get to 2% Military spending is more credible. - - - 🇨🇦 - - - That said, I still have concerns about the Liberal approach: They don’t fear complexity enough. They often add too many secondary goals onto every initiative, muddying execution. They measure themselves too much by promises made or money spent, rather than outcomes delivered. On climate, there’s still too much Malthusian instinct when we should be focusing on abundance, technology, and resilience. But ultimately: They have a climate plan. They value urban Canada. They are more serious about rebuilding state capacity. And they are shifting focus to growth. And that is why, after careful thought, I’ll be voting for the Liberal Party and Mark Carney. Here’s a clip from Monday’s debate where I talked more about how I see the strengths — and blind spots — of both campaigns.
2:26

After a lot of consideration, I have decided I will vote Liberal and for Mark Carney on Monday. I think the Conservatives ran a great campaign and Pierre Poilievre would lead Canada well. That said, I want to explain the deciding factors for my vote — since I know many Conservatives follow me too. - - - 🇨🇦 - - - Despite the partisanship you often see online, I believe both major parties put forward decent if imperfect platforms this election. For all the hand-wringing, there is consensus in Canada for moving in the right direction — on project permitting, natural resource development, tying immigration to infrastructure, interprovincial trade barriers, housing supply reforms, and maintaining strong public finances. Neither platform puts our AAA credit rating at risk. Our pension system remains one of the strongest globally. We aren’t facing the kind of unfunded obligations weighing down many peer countries. We’re still a fortunate country — and our politics are healthier (federally) than we often give them credit for. - - - 🇨🇦 - - - That said, here is why I ultimately decided to vote Liberal. 1) CANDIDATES There are several Liberal candidates I would like to see become MPs: Karim Bardeesy Vince Gasparro and Chi Nguyen just to name a few. 2) HOUSING While I don’t know who will be in Cabinet, my hope is that Nate Erskine-Smith stays on as Housing Minister. We don’t always agree, but from my candid conversations with him, I know how well he understands this issue. I believe there is a genuine will inside the Liberal Party to push hard for real supply reform. Programs like the Housing Accelerator Fund are imperfect, but still good overall. MURB, GST/DC promises, Build Canada etc all good! 3) STATE CAPACITY Conservatives are rightly skeptical of government bloat — but I don’t see the same urgency from them about making government work better. I think the Liberals have more interest to do this. I want to see new agencies like Build Homes Canada not just announced but executed well. 4) CLIMATE The Conservatives offer no real climate plan beyond exporting LNG — and too often slip into mocking anyone who cares about environmental issues. I want to see pipelines built and energy exported — but I also want serious investment in electrification, adaptation, and decarbonization. Canada is one of the countries best positioned to thrive if we take climate adaptation seriously. I don’t want us to waste that advantage. 5) CITIES The Conservatives are not an urban party. Many of their MPs are outright hostile to Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal — and to the people who live in them in rhetoric. In day-to-day governing, I believe cities would be a lower priority under a Conservative government. I live in downtown Toronto. 6) OTHER ITEMS I want to see the CBC reformed, not abolished. I want HSR to Windsor. I think Mark Carney will be able to respond better to a serious economic shock. I think the Liberal plan to get to 2% Military spending is more credible. - - - 🇨🇦 - - - That said, I still have concerns about the Liberal approach: They don’t fear complexity enough. They often add too many secondary goals onto every initiative, muddying execution. They measure themselves too much by promises made or money spent, rather than outcomes delivered. On climate, there’s still too much Malthusian instinct when we should be focusing on abundance, technology, and resilience. But ultimately: They have a climate plan. They value urban Canada. They are more serious about rebuilding state capacity. And they are shifting focus to growth. And that is why, after careful thought, I’ll be voting for the Liberal Party and Mark Carney. Here’s a clip from Monday’s debate where I talked more about how I see the strengths — and blind spots — of both campaigns.

Eric Lombardi (EricForOLP.ca) 🇨🇦🚀

275,443 次观看 • 1 年前

Analyzing Episode 44. Season 2 aka Choice vs Force, and the Repeating Patterns of Oppression When it comes to injustice and oppression in human societies, I find there are three kinds of people. Some are silent watchers, others are enablers, and then there are those who resist. Resistance matters because silence makes room for oppression to grow, and enabling oppression feeds it, until it morphs into a tyrannical beast. But resistance? That's a disrupting force. It reminds systems built on cruelty that human power is never absolute and that fear is never forever. It reminds us that injustice can only survive as long as it goes unchallenged. Even where resistance doesn't bear immediate fruit, it redraws the moral line and allows the victims to be seen. It tells the oppressors their evil is being recorded. Societies don't change because everyone always agrees on something. They change because of a few who refuse to comply with the decrepit patterns of abuse. But what does any of this have to do with episode 44? Well, let's see. We have two stories running parallel in the episode - that of Alya and Cihan, and Kaya and Zerrin. What's common in both tales? Quite a few things, but most importantly, for me, it's how the male-dominated structure of Mardin wants to force two women to live their lives according to what the system dictates is right, rather than what they want themselves. Both Demir and Boran refuse to give up, despite knowing full well that Zerrin and Alya love someone else. And, I refuse to legitimize their behavior built on past traumas, because hey, life ain't easy for anyone. But that doesn't give us a pass to behave like monsters. This entire episode, to me, seems like a tussle between choice and force. The old guard of Mardin, used to issuing orders and having them followed in silence, coming face to face with resistance. With the will to live life on one's own terms. Almost like the writer is trying to say, 'see this shit will just keep going until someone screams enough and fights back.' Let's start with the beginning of the episode. Demir abducts Zerrin and lies about her baby dying so he can later use the same child to blackmail Zerrin into staying with him. Why? Because the psychopath can't see beyond his own wants. Zerrin's choices don't register because to him, she's not a person, just someone to be managed and controlled. So, force becomes his default setting; he lies, emotionally terrorizes, manipulates, does everything to get his own way. And, in this way, he embodies what the episode keeps repeating, that oppression doesn't always have to be violent. Sometimes, it's your refusal to acknowledge someone else's right to choose. There's another scene that stands out to me in this context, where Cihan and Alya are having a conversation, far from the cray cray crowd. In that scene, you get to see what life can be like when two people see each other as equals and choose to work together. When Alya tells Cihan of her fears about Deniz, he doesn't brush them off. He acknowledges them. But then, he also reminds her that she's always been able to get through to her son, and that there's no way Deniz will choose Boran after she informs him of the whole story. What makes CihAl so attractive as a couple is their ability to see each other and acknowledge their humanity and individuality. There's no force here. They stay together because they want to, they choose to. Many people choose to part despite the presence of love, so feelings here take a back seat. It's about free will. Agency. That's the most fundamental human instinct. When you take that away from someone, it's almost like taking away their humanity. Now, I know some of y'all saw the episode and thought Deniz is gonna fall prey to Boran's manipulation. But that's not what I see. When Boran is trying to rip apart CihAl's family portrait, Deniz becomes the reason he can't. And sure, Boran does manage to sway Deniz close to him a time or two, but there are scenes where you can see Deniz pulling back. Like when he realizes Boran really isn't paying any attention to him in the room. And Deniz is Alya's son, too. Which means if there's something he wants, he's going to go after it all out. You can see that in the way he refuses to stop calling Cihan 'Baba' even though Boran tries his level best. Now, let's turn back the dial a little and think about the other message Guilzar let slip in the episode. When Ummu and Ihityar are talking about how Alya is being manipulated by Boran using Deniz, and there's nothing to be done about it, Kadir speaks up. In that scene, to me, Kadir is the writer, telling the audience that the weaponization of a child against a parent isn't acceptable. That the parents, in this case, Alya and Cihan, have feelings too. They've been through hell and were rewarded with true love. And they deserve to live that love. When Kadir says love like that is worth dying for, it seemed to drive home the point that you don't give up when you love like Alya and Cihan love each other. You certainly don't allow yourself to be boxed in a corner because of the love of your child. Because that, too, is a form of coercion. I'm not going to talk a lot about Boran and his tantrums because to me, he and Demir were mirror images in this episode. The ugly face of abuse weaponized as 'love.' And Sadakat? She's the worst kind of enabler there is. She keeps going, Alya, singling her out, simply because she thinks Alya is the weakest link. Since Sadakat can't stand to see her family break apart, she's only too willing to homage to the age-old custom of male compulsion by helping her pislik of a first-born. Ugh. Anyway, going back to the message of this episode - patterns of oppression on repeat? It kind of makes me glad that both Boran and Demir are going to step out of bounds to do something really fcuking stupid. Because their desperation will force a reckoning that's been a long time coming. Once these lines are crossed, one hopes what we see is change because Lord knows, it's time this damn pattern breaks, once and for all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir
3:30

Analyzing Episode 44. Season 2 aka Choice vs Force, and the Repeating Patterns of Oppression When it comes to injustice and oppression in human societies, I find there are three kinds of people. Some are silent watchers, others are enablers, and then there are those who resist. Resistance matters because silence makes room for oppression to grow, and enabling oppression feeds it, until it morphs into a tyrannical beast. But resistance? That's a disrupting force. It reminds systems built on cruelty that human power is never absolute and that fear is never forever. It reminds us that injustice can only survive as long as it goes unchallenged. Even where resistance doesn't bear immediate fruit, it redraws the moral line and allows the victims to be seen. It tells the oppressors their evil is being recorded. Societies don't change because everyone always agrees on something. They change because of a few who refuse to comply with the decrepit patterns of abuse. But what does any of this have to do with episode 44? Well, let's see. We have two stories running parallel in the episode - that of Alya and Cihan, and Kaya and Zerrin. What's common in both tales? Quite a few things, but most importantly, for me, it's how the male-dominated structure of Mardin wants to force two women to live their lives according to what the system dictates is right, rather than what they want themselves. Both Demir and Boran refuse to give up, despite knowing full well that Zerrin and Alya love someone else. And, I refuse to legitimize their behavior built on past traumas, because hey, life ain't easy for anyone. But that doesn't give us a pass to behave like monsters. This entire episode, to me, seems like a tussle between choice and force. The old guard of Mardin, used to issuing orders and having them followed in silence, coming face to face with resistance. With the will to live life on one's own terms. Almost like the writer is trying to say, 'see this shit will just keep going until someone screams enough and fights back.' Let's start with the beginning of the episode. Demir abducts Zerrin and lies about her baby dying so he can later use the same child to blackmail Zerrin into staying with him. Why? Because the psychopath can't see beyond his own wants. Zerrin's choices don't register because to him, she's not a person, just someone to be managed and controlled. So, force becomes his default setting; he lies, emotionally terrorizes, manipulates, does everything to get his own way. And, in this way, he embodies what the episode keeps repeating, that oppression doesn't always have to be violent. Sometimes, it's your refusal to acknowledge someone else's right to choose. There's another scene that stands out to me in this context, where Cihan and Alya are having a conversation, far from the cray cray crowd. In that scene, you get to see what life can be like when two people see each other as equals and choose to work together. When Alya tells Cihan of her fears about Deniz, he doesn't brush them off. He acknowledges them. But then, he also reminds her that she's always been able to get through to her son, and that there's no way Deniz will choose Boran after she informs him of the whole story. What makes CihAl so attractive as a couple is their ability to see each other and acknowledge their humanity and individuality. There's no force here. They stay together because they want to, they choose to. Many people choose to part despite the presence of love, so feelings here take a back seat. It's about free will. Agency. That's the most fundamental human instinct. When you take that away from someone, it's almost like taking away their humanity. Now, I know some of y'all saw the episode and thought Deniz is gonna fall prey to Boran's manipulation. But that's not what I see. When Boran is trying to rip apart CihAl's family portrait, Deniz becomes the reason he can't. And sure, Boran does manage to sway Deniz close to him a time or two, but there are scenes where you can see Deniz pulling back. Like when he realizes Boran really isn't paying any attention to him in the room. And Deniz is Alya's son, too. Which means if there's something he wants, he's going to go after it all out. You can see that in the way he refuses to stop calling Cihan 'Baba' even though Boran tries his level best. Now, let's turn back the dial a little and think about the other message Guilzar let slip in the episode. When Ummu and Ihityar are talking about how Alya is being manipulated by Boran using Deniz, and there's nothing to be done about it, Kadir speaks up. In that scene, to me, Kadir is the writer, telling the audience that the weaponization of a child against a parent isn't acceptable. That the parents, in this case, Alya and Cihan, have feelings too. They've been through hell and were rewarded with true love. And they deserve to live that love. When Kadir says love like that is worth dying for, it seemed to drive home the point that you don't give up when you love like Alya and Cihan love each other. You certainly don't allow yourself to be boxed in a corner because of the love of your child. Because that, too, is a form of coercion. I'm not going to talk a lot about Boran and his tantrums because to me, he and Demir were mirror images in this episode. The ugly face of abuse weaponized as 'love.' And Sadakat? She's the worst kind of enabler there is. She keeps going, Alya, singling her out, simply because she thinks Alya is the weakest link. Since Sadakat can't stand to see her family break apart, she's only too willing to homage to the age-old custom of male compulsion by helping her pislik of a first-born. Ugh. Anyway, going back to the message of this episode - patterns of oppression on repeat? It kind of makes me glad that both Boran and Demir are going to step out of bounds to do something really fcuking stupid. Because their desperation will force a reckoning that's been a long time coming. Once these lines are crossed, one hopes what we see is change because Lord knows, it's time this damn pattern breaks, once and for all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

13,898 次观看 • 9 个月前

If Matt Walsh has been looking and sounding a little stiff and shrill lately, it's probably because he is not able to sit comfortably. This is due to the Big Hand, which had to be inserted fairly deep so that it could move his mouth well enough to create the appropriate noises. The appropriate noises, in this case, being "you have offered no individual solution". Note that word, "individual". The Big Hand is very keen to slip that word into the premises of any debate, lest the discussion turn to solutions that involve collective action. The Big Hand does not want you to discuss collective action, because collective action might actually end up changing the status quo. It is, in fact, transparently obvious that nothing else will. No detailed examination of the problem is required. We need only look at who has the problem. A problem that a few individuals have is a personal problem, requiring a personal solution. A problem that a whole society has is a political problem, requiring a political solution. The problem we have is slave labor. Why is this a problem? It's certainly not a problem for the Big Hand which is moving Matt Walsh's mouth. It's not a problem for the boomers, who need... well, want... cheap workers for the business they own. (Businesses they were able to start or buy because their own labor, in their younger years, was highly compensated.) But it is a problem for them. They just don't realize it, because right all they see is the cheap labor. The bad consequences come along later. Slave labor destroys empires. How? Why? Well, what is a slave? In the political sense, a slave is a worker who cannot participate in the free market, because he is constrained by physical force. He cannot sell his labor to the highest bidder, and therefore he cannot negotiate. He must take what he is given. A literal slave cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because his employer is legally allowed to use force to make him stay. An prisoner in a labor program cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because he cannot go where other employers are. An indentured servant cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because the state will use force on him to compel him to complete his contract. A work visa immigrant cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because if he quits or is fired, he will be banned for the economy altogether, and must return to where he came from. That's what a slave is. So what is a free market? A free market is an economy where all actors are free from forcible constraint on their economic choices. Obviously, no market is totally free — you're not allowed to start an assassination service, and if you were, it could be used to constrain the economic freedom of others. But nations prosper when their markets are as free as possible, and fail when they are not. When you introduce slavery, whether it is called slavery, or slipped in the back door under some softer name, you destroy the free market. It is impossible for a free worker to economically compete with a slave without becoming a slave himself. Because a slave cannot negotiate, and must take what he is unilaterally given, a free worker must be more expensive until and unless he accepts what a slave receives. And what a slave receives is unilaterally set by his employer. Where slavery exists, a free worker is left with three options: 1. Take what a slave takes, and be treated as a slave is treated, thereby becoming equivalent to a slave. 2. Be unemployed, and subsist through government handouts, charity, or crime. 3. Become an entrepreneur, and own slaves rather than being one... if he can. If he succeeds in ascending to the business owner class, he will become a slaver himself. He will have no choice. If other businesses employ slaves to reduce labor costs, so must he. Obviously, all of this is bad for the free worker. But... so what? What if we are amoral, and we want to be slavers? What if we want to be mob bosses? What if we want America to be a slave empire, built by slave workers and defended by slave soldiers? What if we want an entire world composed of 0.1% white and jewish slave owners, supported by a massive underclass of brown slaves? Sure, those pesky middle class libertarians would fuss, until we got rid of them, but wouldn't it all just work? Wouldn't it be awesome for the 0.1%? All we'd need to do is implement massive technological control programs over news and information to prevent those dumb brown slaves from revolting. And the Big Hand will never be short of an extra Matt Walsh to wield as a puppet. So this sounds awesome, right? Global slave empire, and if you object, you're a loser who gets money from doing work, instead of owning things, and you deserve to be a slave. Well... it sounds awesome until you crack a history or economics textbook. Slavery collapses economies. Collapsed economies collapse empires. You see, when you import slaves, and pay them slave wages, you are able to save money on labor, and produce goods and services more cheaply. That would be great for you... if the economy were a zero sum game. It's not. Because when you produce goods and services, you need someone to sell them to. Has everyone suddenly forgotten how a depression works? What is it that is depressed, in a depression? Wages, that's what. When wages are depressed, the people earning them spend less on goods and services. When they spend less on goods and services, producers of those goods and services must produce them more cheaply so they can sell. Which means they need to save on materials and labor. This drive wages down, both directly when companies cut labor costs, and indirectly when the companies that serve them with material goods need to produce those goods more cheaply. Which depresses spending even further. And then the government starts printing money, because impoverished slaves can't pay taxes. So now the money is worthless, too. That's what a depression is. It's a downward spiral. And slave labor is a fast track ticket to depression and economic collapse. Rome survived Carthage. Rome survived perpetual war. Rome survived rebellion, political coups, assassinations, chaos. Rome couldn't survive this. Neither can America. You cannot prosper alone. If you get rich by making others rich, you have allies. You have a system of mutual support. You have free market capitalism. If you get rich by making others poor, there will be no one to trade with. The most insidious part of this is that it's not a choice that individual business owners can make. Once the gates of slavery are open, and competitors in your industry begin to use slave labor, your only choice is either to be undercut and go bankrupt, or to follow suit and survive... until the economy collapses and everyone goes bankrupt. Whether it is importing foreign indentured servants, or exporting entire industries to places where workers are slaves, slavery has a gravitational force that pulls all economies to it, then gradually destroys them. Slavery anywhere is slavery everywhere. Steep tariffs on H1B and imported goods are not DEI for Americans, because Americans can compete with any workforce on the planet so long as those workers are free. Tariffs on imported workers, goods, and services, are incentive barricades against slavery. They are a temporary measure until we can eradicate slavery from the planet. Which we must do, or any advanced civilization, including America, will not survive. Some may not care if America survives, but you need to. It's where you keep all your stuff.
1:29

If Matt Walsh has been looking and sounding a little stiff and shrill lately, it's probably because he is not able to sit comfortably. This is due to the Big Hand, which had to be inserted fairly deep so that it could move his mouth well enough to create the appropriate noises. The appropriate noises, in this case, being "you have offered no individual solution". Note that word, "individual". The Big Hand is very keen to slip that word into the premises of any debate, lest the discussion turn to solutions that involve collective action. The Big Hand does not want you to discuss collective action, because collective action might actually end up changing the status quo. It is, in fact, transparently obvious that nothing else will. No detailed examination of the problem is required. We need only look at who has the problem. A problem that a few individuals have is a personal problem, requiring a personal solution. A problem that a whole society has is a political problem, requiring a political solution. The problem we have is slave labor. Why is this a problem? It's certainly not a problem for the Big Hand which is moving Matt Walsh's mouth. It's not a problem for the boomers, who need... well, want... cheap workers for the business they own. (Businesses they were able to start or buy because their own labor, in their younger years, was highly compensated.) But it is a problem for them. They just don't realize it, because right all they see is the cheap labor. The bad consequences come along later. Slave labor destroys empires. How? Why? Well, what is a slave? In the political sense, a slave is a worker who cannot participate in the free market, because he is constrained by physical force. He cannot sell his labor to the highest bidder, and therefore he cannot negotiate. He must take what he is given. A literal slave cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because his employer is legally allowed to use force to make him stay. An prisoner in a labor program cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because he cannot go where other employers are. An indentured servant cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because the state will use force on him to compel him to complete his contract. A work visa immigrant cannot find a higher bidder to sell his labor to, because if he quits or is fired, he will be banned for the economy altogether, and must return to where he came from. That's what a slave is. So what is a free market? A free market is an economy where all actors are free from forcible constraint on their economic choices. Obviously, no market is totally free — you're not allowed to start an assassination service, and if you were, it could be used to constrain the economic freedom of others. But nations prosper when their markets are as free as possible, and fail when they are not. When you introduce slavery, whether it is called slavery, or slipped in the back door under some softer name, you destroy the free market. It is impossible for a free worker to economically compete with a slave without becoming a slave himself. Because a slave cannot negotiate, and must take what he is unilaterally given, a free worker must be more expensive until and unless he accepts what a slave receives. And what a slave receives is unilaterally set by his employer. Where slavery exists, a free worker is left with three options: 1. Take what a slave takes, and be treated as a slave is treated, thereby becoming equivalent to a slave. 2. Be unemployed, and subsist through government handouts, charity, or crime. 3. Become an entrepreneur, and own slaves rather than being one... if he can. If he succeeds in ascending to the business owner class, he will become a slaver himself. He will have no choice. If other businesses employ slaves to reduce labor costs, so must he. Obviously, all of this is bad for the free worker. But... so what? What if we are amoral, and we want to be slavers? What if we want to be mob bosses? What if we want America to be a slave empire, built by slave workers and defended by slave soldiers? What if we want an entire world composed of 0.1% white and jewish slave owners, supported by a massive underclass of brown slaves? Sure, those pesky middle class libertarians would fuss, until we got rid of them, but wouldn't it all just work? Wouldn't it be awesome for the 0.1%? All we'd need to do is implement massive technological control programs over news and information to prevent those dumb brown slaves from revolting. And the Big Hand will never be short of an extra Matt Walsh to wield as a puppet. So this sounds awesome, right? Global slave empire, and if you object, you're a loser who gets money from doing work, instead of owning things, and you deserve to be a slave. Well... it sounds awesome until you crack a history or economics textbook. Slavery collapses economies. Collapsed economies collapse empires. You see, when you import slaves, and pay them slave wages, you are able to save money on labor, and produce goods and services more cheaply. That would be great for you... if the economy were a zero sum game. It's not. Because when you produce goods and services, you need someone to sell them to. Has everyone suddenly forgotten how a depression works? What is it that is depressed, in a depression? Wages, that's what. When wages are depressed, the people earning them spend less on goods and services. When they spend less on goods and services, producers of those goods and services must produce them more cheaply so they can sell. Which means they need to save on materials and labor. This drive wages down, both directly when companies cut labor costs, and indirectly when the companies that serve them with material goods need to produce those goods more cheaply. Which depresses spending even further. And then the government starts printing money, because impoverished slaves can't pay taxes. So now the money is worthless, too. That's what a depression is. It's a downward spiral. And slave labor is a fast track ticket to depression and economic collapse. Rome survived Carthage. Rome survived perpetual war. Rome survived rebellion, political coups, assassinations, chaos. Rome couldn't survive this. Neither can America. You cannot prosper alone. If you get rich by making others rich, you have allies. You have a system of mutual support. You have free market capitalism. If you get rich by making others poor, there will be no one to trade with. The most insidious part of this is that it's not a choice that individual business owners can make. Once the gates of slavery are open, and competitors in your industry begin to use slave labor, your only choice is either to be undercut and go bankrupt, or to follow suit and survive... until the economy collapses and everyone goes bankrupt. Whether it is importing foreign indentured servants, or exporting entire industries to places where workers are slaves, slavery has a gravitational force that pulls all economies to it, then gradually destroys them. Slavery anywhere is slavery everywhere. Steep tariffs on H1B and imported goods are not DEI for Americans, because Americans can compete with any workforce on the planet so long as those workers are free. Tariffs on imported workers, goods, and services, are incentive barricades against slavery. They are a temporary measure until we can eradicate slavery from the planet. Which we must do, or any advanced civilization, including America, will not survive. Some may not care if America survives, but you need to. It's where you keep all your stuff.

Devon Eriksen

66,349 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICAN SCHOOL CHILDREN YOUR KIDS GOT EXTRA CREDIT AT AN ILLINOIS MOSQUE RUN BY ICNA’S CONVERSION ARM A "world religion" class was taken to a Chicago-area mosque with their teacher, Emily. The man in front of them was not a museum guide. He was Dr. Sabeel Ahmed of GainPeace - the official dawah / outreach project of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). Speakers. Open houses. Free Qurans. Follow-up for new Muslims. That is ICNA’s public conversion apparatus. ICNA is not a bake sale. Investigators have documented its Jamaat-e-Islami roots. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo - entered as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial - listed ICNA among “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” Before the tour even started, he asked Aaron what class it was. World religion. Had they already covered the Islam chapter? Yes. Then he said it was “fair game” to quiz them. On tape: “Extra grade, right? Extra credit, perhaps. Some of you need some extra credits.” Hands went up. He ran them through the pillars like Sunday school. Daily prayer. Hajj once in a lifetime. Ramadan. He asked how many Muslims were in the class. Aaron. Amir. Yusuf. Emily asked when kids start fasting. He said obligation starts at puberty - then bragged that his son fasted the entire month at age seven. He bragged on film about how his little daughter puts on hijab automatically when she leaves the house. A student asked how you convert. No baptism. No pool in the basement. Understand the six beliefs and five pillars, then say: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger. That sentence makes you a Muslim. Then you are expected to live by it. Another student asked the question every parent should hear: What happens if you follow another faith? This is where the game begins. He quoted Quran 2:256: no compulsion in religion. No force. Peaceful education. Your choice. Then he flipped it. Islam is the faith God ordained for humanity. Islam means submitting to the Creator. If you hear that and consciously reject it, there are consequences. Life is a classroom. God is the teacher. At the end comes the exam. Paradise if you submit. Hellfire if you die having rejected Islam. He never told them what “no compulsion” leaves out. The same chapter tells Muslims to fight until religion is for Allah. Muhammad said he was ordered to fight people until they declare there is no god but Allah. Leave Islam after entering it, and classical law is not a debate club. The hadith is: kill him. Apostasy has been punished that way for 1,400 years. A top cleric later admitted that without the apostasy punishment, Islam would not exist today. None of that made the field trip. He also told Christian students there are no statues, no images, no mediator. You pray straight to God. That is not a décor note. That is a denial of Christ as mediator, delivered to kids sitting on a mosque floor for class credit. Women and girls pray upstairs. Men downstairs. His “logical” reason on tape: a boy standing shoulder to shoulder, touching a pretty girl, might think about her instead of God. Prostration in mixed rows would not be “decent.” Friday prayer: men must leave school and work. He said the place holds maybe 300 on a normal day and 2,000 on Friday - gym, basement, classrooms, two services. Kids from the full-time Islamic school break class and file in. He called it the second-largest Islamic school in the United States. Emily did not push back. She sold it. “Very inclusive.” “You got their brains stirring.” Shoes off - “immersive.” Come back during prayer and watch them pray, if the school allows it. “Way better to see it than read it in a book.” She even showed the class One Day in the Haram on Amazon - a Mecca film about spreading Islam on social media. This was not interfaith. This was ICNA GainPeace dawah with a public-school teacher, extra credit, and a camera. Illinois parents: who signed the slip? Who called this extra credit? Who partnered a classroom with a Brotherhood-listed network’s missionary wing and called it education? SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE:
15:59

🚨 ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICAN SCHOOL CHILDREN YOUR KIDS GOT EXTRA CREDIT AT AN ILLINOIS MOSQUE RUN BY ICNA’S CONVERSION ARM A "world religion" class was taken to a Chicago-area mosque with their teacher, Emily. The man in front of them was not a museum guide. He was Dr. Sabeel Ahmed of GainPeace - the official dawah / outreach project of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). Speakers. Open houses. Free Qurans. Follow-up for new Muslims. That is ICNA’s public conversion apparatus. ICNA is not a bake sale. Investigators have documented its Jamaat-e-Islami roots. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo - entered as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial - listed ICNA among “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” Before the tour even started, he asked Aaron what class it was. World religion. Had they already covered the Islam chapter? Yes. Then he said it was “fair game” to quiz them. On tape: “Extra grade, right? Extra credit, perhaps. Some of you need some extra credits.” Hands went up. He ran them through the pillars like Sunday school. Daily prayer. Hajj once in a lifetime. Ramadan. He asked how many Muslims were in the class. Aaron. Amir. Yusuf. Emily asked when kids start fasting. He said obligation starts at puberty - then bragged that his son fasted the entire month at age seven. He bragged on film about how his little daughter puts on hijab automatically when she leaves the house. A student asked how you convert. No baptism. No pool in the basement. Understand the six beliefs and five pillars, then say: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger. That sentence makes you a Muslim. Then you are expected to live by it. Another student asked the question every parent should hear: What happens if you follow another faith? This is where the game begins. He quoted Quran 2:256: no compulsion in religion. No force. Peaceful education. Your choice. Then he flipped it. Islam is the faith God ordained for humanity. Islam means submitting to the Creator. If you hear that and consciously reject it, there are consequences. Life is a classroom. God is the teacher. At the end comes the exam. Paradise if you submit. Hellfire if you die having rejected Islam. He never told them what “no compulsion” leaves out. The same chapter tells Muslims to fight until religion is for Allah. Muhammad said he was ordered to fight people until they declare there is no god but Allah. Leave Islam after entering it, and classical law is not a debate club. The hadith is: kill him. Apostasy has been punished that way for 1,400 years. A top cleric later admitted that without the apostasy punishment, Islam would not exist today. None of that made the field trip. He also told Christian students there are no statues, no images, no mediator. You pray straight to God. That is not a décor note. That is a denial of Christ as mediator, delivered to kids sitting on a mosque floor for class credit. Women and girls pray upstairs. Men downstairs. His “logical” reason on tape: a boy standing shoulder to shoulder, touching a pretty girl, might think about her instead of God. Prostration in mixed rows would not be “decent.” Friday prayer: men must leave school and work. He said the place holds maybe 300 on a normal day and 2,000 on Friday - gym, basement, classrooms, two services. Kids from the full-time Islamic school break class and file in. He called it the second-largest Islamic school in the United States. Emily did not push back. She sold it. “Very inclusive.” “You got their brains stirring.” Shoes off - “immersive.” Come back during prayer and watch them pray, if the school allows it. “Way better to see it than read it in a book.” She even showed the class One Day in the Haram on Amazon - a Mecca film about spreading Islam on social media. This was not interfaith. This was ICNA GainPeace dawah with a public-school teacher, extra credit, and a camera. Illinois parents: who signed the slip? Who called this extra credit? Who partnered a classroom with a Brotherhood-listed network’s missionary wing and called it education? SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE:

Amy Mek

39,581 次观看 • 1 个月前