Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Final boss scene: Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol. Made with Seedance 2.0.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

239,270 subscribers

24,371 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

More action scenes from the Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol eval set. Both generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:13

More action scenes from the Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol eval set. Both generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

63,973 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Action scene comparison round. GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:14

Action scene comparison round. GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

53,175 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:14

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

33,370 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Action scene comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:12

Action scene comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

24,426 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:11

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

41,820 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle monster battle brief. Both outputs made with Seedance 2.0.
0:13

How GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5 handle monster battle brief. Both outputs made with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

31,819 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

147,311 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Kimi K3, which one do you think is better? Share your opinion in the comments!
0:13

GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Kimi K3, which one do you think is better? Share your opinion in the comments!

Sam

62,684 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

93,144 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Grok 4.5 at $0.15. GPT-5.6 Sol at $0.60. Qwen 3.8 Max at $0.67. Kimi K3 at $1.98. Who won?
0:16

Grok 4.5 at $0.15. GPT-5.6 Sol at $0.60. Qwen 3.8 Max at $0.67. Kimi K3 at $1.98. Who won?

0xMarioNawfal

75,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓
0:13

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓

Kiki

21,329 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads
0:14

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads

Romain Torres

2,109,553 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4
0:13

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4

GMI Cloud

24,715 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2
0:14

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2

Shara I Ai Video Creator

13,742 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP
0:13

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP

Romain Torres

188,221 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Same concept. Two AI assistants writing the prompt Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol animated by Seedance 2.0, powered by BytePlus Both prompts below so you can test them yourself
0:13

Same concept. Two AI assistants writing the prompt Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol animated by Seedance 2.0, powered by BytePlus Both prompts below so you can test them yourself

Magnific

11,475 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

479,495 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2 Prompt below:
0:13

Made with Seedance 2.0 + GPT image 2 Prompt below:

Shara

17,748 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.
0:12

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.

Design Arena

22,584 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.
0:13

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

Bhavy☄️

34,045 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten