Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Finally, Jake Brancatella confirmed he will debate me on his visit to Texas. I want to get final confirmation from Jake before I finalize the venue and arrangements. Here is what I propose: Topic: Ibada and Shirk Since this is a big topic, I suggest breaking it into smaller...

Haqiqatjou's profile picture

Daniel Haqiqatjou

177,652 subscribers

36,094 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🤣 Farid is an ignorant Madkhali who deliberately lies about me. I never denied that it is shirk. This is what I said in the same livestream he is citing. But he is too dishonest to acknowledge this. No matter how many times I say it, low IQ Wahhabis will always misunderstand. Saying that something is not known with certainty to be shirk DOES NOT MEAN it is not shirk. Why it is so important to determine that something is known with certainty is that that is what is needed for takfir. According to the standards of Wahhabis, this is why not only all Shia are kuffar (even though most Shia don't accept this notion of wilaya takwiniyya), also all sufis and all barelwis. They are mushriks who deserve to be killed because they commit shirk akbar. This is the doctrine of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab. But Farid does taqiyya on all this. He wants to declare all these groups as believing in shirk akbar, but he secretly hides what that means: that the blood of millions of Shia and Sunnis are halal and, as apostates, they deserve to be killed. That is what Ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed and him and his followers murdered countless Muslims. Farid praises Ibn abd al-Wahhab but stays quiet about these facts. It's called taqiyya. Also called grifting. BTW Farid, still waiting for you to tell us if building Hindu temples is shirk akbar, since you're such an expert. 🤡
1:14

🤣 Farid is an ignorant Madkhali who deliberately lies about me. I never denied that it is shirk. This is what I said in the same livestream he is citing. But he is too dishonest to acknowledge this. No matter how many times I say it, low IQ Wahhabis will always misunderstand. Saying that something is not known with certainty to be shirk DOES NOT MEAN it is not shirk. Why it is so important to determine that something is known with certainty is that that is what is needed for takfir. According to the standards of Wahhabis, this is why not only all Shia are kuffar (even though most Shia don't accept this notion of wilaya takwiniyya), also all sufis and all barelwis. They are mushriks who deserve to be killed because they commit shirk akbar. This is the doctrine of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab. But Farid does taqiyya on all this. He wants to declare all these groups as believing in shirk akbar, but he secretly hides what that means: that the blood of millions of Shia and Sunnis are halal and, as apostates, they deserve to be killed. That is what Ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed and him and his followers murdered countless Muslims. Farid praises Ibn abd al-Wahhab but stays quiet about these facts. It's called taqiyya. Also called grifting. BTW Farid, still waiting for you to tell us if building Hindu temples is shirk akbar, since you're such an expert. 🤡

Daniel Haqiqatjou

77,090 views • 1 year ago

How can Daniel Haqiqatjou think he can get away with lying so easily? In the clip he posted, he literally says that the "Muslim" is "praying, making istighatha, and making du'a" to Jesus to be healed. He uses the terms praying, istighatha, and du'a synonymously several times in the clip, but now he's trying to convince us that he's making a distinction between "praying to Jesus and istighatha to Jesus"? What does he think the distinction is supposed to be? Daniel says the only difference is the person not believing Jesus is God. Daniel says he's not 100% sure that a "Muslim praying to, making istighatha to, and making du'a to Jesus for Jesus to heal him" is shirk akbar. This is why even Ash'aris and Maturidis are denouncing you. Even Asrar Rashid responded to you and said that this is shirk.
1:00

How can Daniel Haqiqatjou think he can get away with lying so easily? In the clip he posted, he literally says that the "Muslim" is "praying, making istighatha, and making du'a" to Jesus to be healed. He uses the terms praying, istighatha, and du'a synonymously several times in the clip, but now he's trying to convince us that he's making a distinction between "praying to Jesus and istighatha to Jesus"? What does he think the distinction is supposed to be? Daniel says the only difference is the person not believing Jesus is God. Daniel says he's not 100% sure that a "Muslim praying to, making istighatha to, and making du'a to Jesus for Jesus to heal him" is shirk akbar. This is why even Ash'aris and Maturidis are denouncing you. Even Asrar Rashid responded to you and said that this is shirk.

Jake Brancatella

38,818 views • 9 months ago

Jake makes a HUGE blunder on istighatha. Jake: "If [a person] was in front of the grave of the Prophet and made that statement [O Prophet give me a child] and he meant by that he is asking the Prophet to make dua for him, then we believe this is a bida." ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ Jake, further explaining: "The people who do that [ask the Prophet directly for children] in front of the grave of the Prophet with the meaning that they are asking the Prophet to make dua for them for those things, NO, that's NOT shirk akbar." Me, trying to get clarification: "What is the ruling for the person who says 'O Prophet give me a child?' at his grave? Is that shirk akbar or not?" Jake: "You said that by that they mean just asking the Prophet to make dua?" Me: "But they don't say that. They just say 'O Prophet give me a child." Jake: It doesn't matter. ________________________ What do the Wahhabis make of this? This guy is your aqida police lol Even Deen at the end of the clip says that "everone was telling" him that this was a blunder.
9:13

Jake makes a HUGE blunder on istighatha. Jake: "If [a person] was in front of the grave of the Prophet and made that statement [O Prophet give me a child] and he meant by that he is asking the Prophet to make dua for him, then we believe this is a bida." ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ Jake, further explaining: "The people who do that [ask the Prophet directly for children] in front of the grave of the Prophet with the meaning that they are asking the Prophet to make dua for them for those things, NO, that's NOT shirk akbar." Me, trying to get clarification: "What is the ruling for the person who says 'O Prophet give me a child?' at his grave? Is that shirk akbar or not?" Jake: "You said that by that they mean just asking the Prophet to make dua?" Me: "But they don't say that. They just say 'O Prophet give me a child." Jake: It doesn't matter. ________________________ What do the Wahhabis make of this? This guy is your aqida police lol Even Deen at the end of the clip says that "everone was telling" him that this was a blunder.

Daniel Haqiqatjou

42,774 views • 8 months ago

THIS IS NOT “JUST ENTERTAINMENT.” This video shows the Adimu Orisha Eyo procession emerging from a shrine with ebo (sacrifice) in broad daylight, in preparation for Eyo Oru tonight on Lagos Island. So, to those who say “Eyo is just entertainment”: How entertaining is this? When sacrifice and religious rites are offered to other than Allah, this is no longer culture or entertainment. THIS IS SHIRK. And shirk is not something a Muslim can participate in, excuse or disguise as culture. Allah says: إِنَّ الشِّرْكَ لَظُلْمٌ عَظِيمٌ “Indeed, shirk is a tremendous ظلم.” [Surah Luqmān 31:13] And He says: قُلْ يَا أَيُّهَا الْكَافِرُونَ ۝ لَا أَعْبُدُ مَا تَعْبُدُونَ «“Say: O disbelievers! I do not worship what you worship.”[Surah Al-Kafirun 109:1–2] There is no Muslim way to participate in shirk. O Muslims, stay away from Eyo Oru tonight from 11 p.m. Guard your Tawḥīd. Guard your īmān. Keep your families away. Stay safe. Culture does not sanctify shirk. Tradition does not make shirk permissible. Entertainment does not make shirk harmless. Choose Tawḥīd. May Allah preserve our īmān and keep us firm upon pure Tawḥīd. Āmīn. - Ustadh Ahmad Adetola-Kazeem Abu Muhsin
0:44

THIS IS NOT “JUST ENTERTAINMENT.” This video shows the Adimu Orisha Eyo procession emerging from a shrine with ebo (sacrifice) in broad daylight, in preparation for Eyo Oru tonight on Lagos Island. So, to those who say “Eyo is just entertainment”: How entertaining is this? When sacrifice and religious rites are offered to other than Allah, this is no longer culture or entertainment. THIS IS SHIRK. And shirk is not something a Muslim can participate in, excuse or disguise as culture. Allah says: إِنَّ الشِّرْكَ لَظُلْمٌ عَظِيمٌ “Indeed, shirk is a tremendous ظلم.” [Surah Luqmān 31:13] And He says: قُلْ يَا أَيُّهَا الْكَافِرُونَ ۝ لَا أَعْبُدُ مَا تَعْبُدُونَ «“Say: O disbelievers! I do not worship what you worship.”[Surah Al-Kafirun 109:1–2] There is no Muslim way to participate in shirk. O Muslims, stay away from Eyo Oru tonight from 11 p.m. Guard your Tawḥīd. Guard your īmān. Keep your families away. Stay safe. Culture does not sanctify shirk. Tradition does not make shirk permissible. Entertainment does not make shirk harmless. Choose Tawḥīd. May Allah preserve our īmān and keep us firm upon pure Tawḥīd. Āmīn. - Ustadh Ahmad Adetola-Kazeem Abu Muhsin

Sherifdeen of Nigeria 🇳🇬

288,896 views • 9 days ago

Unbelievable. In reaction to my recent discussion with Mohammed Hijab, Daniel Haqiqatjou says that Hijab does not believe that wilayat at-takwiniyyah (a created being having control over the entire universe) is kufr akbar unless the person attributes istiqlal (independence) to that being. However, Hijab argued the exact opposite. Hijab anticipated Daniel's deviant istiqlali belief and stated that wilayat at-takwiniyyah is shirk akbar regardless of istiqlal. On the other hand, Daniel says that he cannot state that wilayat at-takwiniyyah is clear cut shirk akbar unless the condition of istiqlal is met. I tried to explain this to Hijab during the discussion, but he could not fathom that this was Daniel's actual belief. It's now clear for everyone to see in shaa Allah.
5:18

Unbelievable. In reaction to my recent discussion with Mohammed Hijab, Daniel Haqiqatjou says that Hijab does not believe that wilayat at-takwiniyyah (a created being having control over the entire universe) is kufr akbar unless the person attributes istiqlal (independence) to that being. However, Hijab argued the exact opposite. Hijab anticipated Daniel's deviant istiqlali belief and stated that wilayat at-takwiniyyah is shirk akbar regardless of istiqlal. On the other hand, Daniel says that he cannot state that wilayat at-takwiniyyah is clear cut shirk akbar unless the condition of istiqlal is met. I tried to explain this to Hijab during the discussion, but he could not fathom that this was Daniel's actual belief. It's now clear for everyone to see in shaa Allah.

Jake Brancatella

80,576 views • 1 year ago

Here is a famous individual who has been influenced by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teachings. He clearly indicates that Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Taymiiyya mistakenly endorsed a type shirk by believing in the permissibility of requesting things from angels and jinn. My aim is not to condemn this person. It is simply to point out that Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teachings on istighatha and shirk are very different from Ibn Hanbal's and Ibn Taymiyya's. For those influenced by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Taymiyya did not fully understand shirk and tawhid like Ibn Abd al-Wahhab. Only dishonest people deny these facts.
1:09

Here is a famous individual who has been influenced by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teachings. He clearly indicates that Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Taymiiyya mistakenly endorsed a type shirk by believing in the permissibility of requesting things from angels and jinn. My aim is not to condemn this person. It is simply to point out that Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's teachings on istighatha and shirk are very different from Ibn Hanbal's and Ibn Taymiyya's. For those influenced by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Taymiyya did not fully understand shirk and tawhid like Ibn Abd al-Wahhab. Only dishonest people deny these facts.

Daniel Haqiqatjou

54,818 views • 1 year ago

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”
2:12

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

30,272 views • 2 months ago

Daniel Daniel Haqiqatjou Gives "Shirk Apologist" Unique Significance DH finally answers the question he's been asked about for months regarding his beloved shaykh Salek. According to DH, it's possible that Salek's statements and beliefs expressed in the video below are NOT shirk akbar. DH says, "When I read scholars influenced by Taqi al-Din al-Subki, and they talk about the Prophet ﷺ controlling the universe, I consider the possibility that this might mean control through their dua, even if they don't mention it explicitly. Rather, I only rule this interpretation out if they themselves say that the control exercised by the prophets and saints is not through their dua. This is how I interpret statements made by Taj al-Din al-Subki, Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, al-Suyuti, Sh Salek, and others. I know all of them have read the works of Taqi al-Din and other similar thinkers, and likely share their views." According to DH, it's possible that Salek merely means that the Prophet can make dua to Allah for certain things to happen and for our duas to be answered by Allah. This is the limit of the Prophet’s "control of the universe." DH says that he only rules out this interpretation if someone like Salek himself explicitly says that the "control of the universe" by the Prophet is NOT exercised through du'a to Allah. Guess what? Salek himself explicitly does just that! The video below starts by Salek addressing the topic of making istighatha and asking the Prophet DIRECTLY for things. Salek contrasts this with asking THROUGH the Prophet or asking the Prophet to make du'a for us. Salek explicitly says that we can ask the Prophet DIRECTLY for whatever we want without restrictions. This is because Salek believes that Allah gave all of His dominion to the Prophet for him to do with it whatever he pleases. The entire universe is under the direct authority and control of the Prophet. Salek explicitly says that the Prophet gives us whatever he wants FROM HIMSELF, not by making du'a to Allah or by Allah providing it because Allah already gave it to the Prophet to do with it whatever he pleases. Some examples of what Salek explicity says that we can ask the Prophet for DIRECTLY and that he can provide DIRECTLY FROM HIMSELF: Religious guidance of the heart, ANYTHING from the dunya or akhirah, knowledge, wealth, etc. Salek says that everything in the entire universe is his slave, including space and time and that the Prophet went BEYOND space (La Makaan) and time. Salek says that anyone who accuses him of committing shirk or kufr by making these statements becomes a kafir himself according to Imam al-Shafi'i. QUESTION: According to DH, how could anyone possibly express the shirki understanding of istighatha or al-wilayat at-takwiniyyah in clearer terms than his beloved shaykh Salek in the videos below? QUESTION: Why would DH desperately attempt to make ta'wil of his shaykh's statements when his shaykh explicitly denies DH's interpretation in the videos below? I'll let you all be the judge. Dan, you've cemented yourself as a shirk apologist. Enjoy.
8:06

Daniel Daniel Haqiqatjou Gives "Shirk Apologist" Unique Significance DH finally answers the question he's been asked about for months regarding his beloved shaykh Salek. According to DH, it's possible that Salek's statements and beliefs expressed in the video below are NOT shirk akbar. DH says, "When I read scholars influenced by Taqi al-Din al-Subki, and they talk about the Prophet ﷺ controlling the universe, I consider the possibility that this might mean control through their dua, even if they don't mention it explicitly. Rather, I only rule this interpretation out if they themselves say that the control exercised by the prophets and saints is not through their dua. This is how I interpret statements made by Taj al-Din al-Subki, Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, al-Suyuti, Sh Salek, and others. I know all of them have read the works of Taqi al-Din and other similar thinkers, and likely share their views." According to DH, it's possible that Salek merely means that the Prophet can make dua to Allah for certain things to happen and for our duas to be answered by Allah. This is the limit of the Prophet’s "control of the universe." DH says that he only rules out this interpretation if someone like Salek himself explicitly says that the "control of the universe" by the Prophet is NOT exercised through du'a to Allah. Guess what? Salek himself explicitly does just that! The video below starts by Salek addressing the topic of making istighatha and asking the Prophet DIRECTLY for things. Salek contrasts this with asking THROUGH the Prophet or asking the Prophet to make du'a for us. Salek explicitly says that we can ask the Prophet DIRECTLY for whatever we want without restrictions. This is because Salek believes that Allah gave all of His dominion to the Prophet for him to do with it whatever he pleases. The entire universe is under the direct authority and control of the Prophet. Salek explicitly says that the Prophet gives us whatever he wants FROM HIMSELF, not by making du'a to Allah or by Allah providing it because Allah already gave it to the Prophet to do with it whatever he pleases. Some examples of what Salek explicity says that we can ask the Prophet for DIRECTLY and that he can provide DIRECTLY FROM HIMSELF: Religious guidance of the heart, ANYTHING from the dunya or akhirah, knowledge, wealth, etc. Salek says that everything in the entire universe is his slave, including space and time and that the Prophet went BEYOND space (La Makaan) and time. Salek says that anyone who accuses him of committing shirk or kufr by making these statements becomes a kafir himself according to Imam al-Shafi'i. QUESTION: According to DH, how could anyone possibly express the shirki understanding of istighatha or al-wilayat at-takwiniyyah in clearer terms than his beloved shaykh Salek in the videos below? QUESTION: Why would DH desperately attempt to make ta'wil of his shaykh's statements when his shaykh explicitly denies DH's interpretation in the videos below? I'll let you all be the judge. Dan, you've cemented yourself as a shirk apologist. Enjoy.

Jake Brancatella

43,089 views • 1 year ago

🦖: There was once someone who used to be a fan who loved us, and one day that person said they felt disgusted by us. I can understand that to some extent. It comes from the kind of news they were exposed to and the anger they felt. I myself probably wouldn’t do the same thing that person did to us. 🦖: What I want is for people to look more at the reality of what is happening, what actually occurred between Thailand and Cambodia. And to try to understand it, because in truth, ordinary people like us, and people on the Cambodian side as well, are directly affected by this situation. But this is not something we should be blaming or attacking each other over.
2:19

🦖: There was once someone who used to be a fan who loved us, and one day that person said they felt disgusted by us. I can understand that to some extent. It comes from the kind of news they were exposed to and the anger they felt. I myself probably wouldn’t do the same thing that person did to us. 🦖: What I want is for people to look more at the reality of what is happening, what actually occurred between Thailand and Cambodia. And to try to understand it, because in truth, ordinary people like us, and people on the Cambodian side as well, are directly affected by this situation. But this is not something we should be blaming or attacking each other over.

𝓢𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓯 ࿔⋆🎀

71,792 views • 9 months ago

Mamdani: There are neighborhoods today where you can feel the absence of those who do not feel as if they can leave their homes any longer. And now, if New Yorkers want a leader like the governor that we have, who can look at that cruelty and name it for what it is, then they know that the choice is Governor Hochul. If they want a leader who looks at the cruelty of ICE and sees a playbook of what to deliver at an even greater extent in New York State, then that’s Bruce Blakeman. And I know what choice I would make, and I know that New Yorkers feel the same, and we are all standing here because we believe in the values and ideals that make us so proud to be New Yorkers. And then there are those who are willing to traffic in fearmongering, even if it means trampling upon those very ideals, and we will not stand for that.
1:16

Mamdani: There are neighborhoods today where you can feel the absence of those who do not feel as if they can leave their homes any longer. And now, if New Yorkers want a leader like the governor that we have, who can look at that cruelty and name it for what it is, then they know that the choice is Governor Hochul. If they want a leader who looks at the cruelty of ICE and sees a playbook of what to deliver at an even greater extent in New York State, then that’s Bruce Blakeman. And I know what choice I would make, and I know that New Yorkers feel the same, and we are all standing here because we believe in the values and ideals that make us so proud to be New Yorkers. And then there are those who are willing to traffic in fearmongering, even if it means trampling upon those very ideals, and we will not stand for that.

Acyn

98,548 views • 1 month ago

Angel: but I would say that I enjoy his company, and what we had in the house was very real... He might not be my person... we might not end up in marriage, but if it does, yes, I'm open to that...He is my person at the moment, he is a sweetheart, I'm living in the moment... ❤️ To haters, Angel: I don't really care, about their thoughts, and their opinions and their ideas. What I do care about though, is how I feel, personally. Nobody can tell me what it is, and what it isn't. It's their mouths, they can say whatever they want to say, I'm not tripping. Me : periodtttt #BBNaija #BBNaijaAllStars
1:22

Angel: but I would say that I enjoy his company, and what we had in the house was very real... He might not be my person... we might not end up in marriage, but if it does, yes, I'm open to that...He is my person at the moment, he is a sweetheart, I'm living in the moment... ❤️ To haters, Angel: I don't really care, about their thoughts, and their opinions and their ideas. What I do care about though, is how I feel, personally. Nobody can tell me what it is, and what it isn't. It's their mouths, they can say whatever they want to say, I'm not tripping. Me : periodtttt #BBNaija #BBNaijaAllStars

Hephzibah Gist

287,336 views • 3 years ago

Francis Atwoli: After Raila Odinga, there is no opposition in Kenya. Kalonzo Musyoka is a good man and it is I who told Raila to let Kalonzo Musyoka be the leader of the opposition. This is a good man, he is a diplomat, he is a person who can be a priest, he can be a person who can pray for anybody, he is a man that you can trust with whatever you have. But he is not best suited to say that he is the person who can be the leader of the opposition in this country. If Kenyans want, he can be the president #JKLive
1:10

Francis Atwoli: After Raila Odinga, there is no opposition in Kenya. Kalonzo Musyoka is a good man and it is I who told Raila to let Kalonzo Musyoka be the leader of the opposition. This is a good man, he is a diplomat, he is a person who can be a priest, he can be a person who can pray for anybody, he is a man that you can trust with whatever you have. But he is not best suited to say that he is the person who can be the leader of the opposition in this country. If Kenyans want, he can be the president #JKLive

Citizen TV Kenya

86,927 views • 8 months ago

🦋: Because I’m an introvert and I’m not a very open person(someone who isn't very revealing). Some things, I do think about them like... "Hey, will the younger one (Nong) think anything if I say this?" But in the end, I feel like speaking out is best, better than... expressing is the best. She (Miu) is okay; she’s more expressive than I am. She’s the type of person who speaks whatever she thinks. But I’m the type who keeps it in a bit first, and then speaks. So we have to meet in the middle to see how our communication style will be. And once it gets past that... bumpy stage for a while, it starts to flow very well. I’m not stunned (by her) because I know what kind of person she is. And I try to adjust myself to the person I’m acting/working with. Since I have to work with her, I have to understand her, understand who she is. Understanding what she's like, so we can be together without me judging her. #บวงสรวงHerInFrame #lalinalena #ลีน่าลลินา #LenaMiu
0:47

🦋: Because I’m an introvert and I’m not a very open person(someone who isn't very revealing). Some things, I do think about them like... "Hey, will the younger one (Nong) think anything if I say this?" But in the end, I feel like speaking out is best, better than... expressing is the best. She (Miu) is okay; she’s more expressive than I am. She’s the type of person who speaks whatever she thinks. But I’m the type who keeps it in a bit first, and then speaks. So we have to meet in the middle to see how our communication style will be. And once it gets past that... bumpy stage for a while, it starts to flow very well. I’m not stunned (by her) because I know what kind of person she is. And I try to adjust myself to the person I’m acting/working with. Since I have to work with her, I have to understand her, understand who she is. Understanding what she's like, so we can be together without me judging her. #บวงสรวงHerInFrame #lalinalena #ลีน่าลลินา #LenaMiu

biruaena

40,667 views • 6 months ago

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!
2:59

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!

Capt KEVman!!!

46,092 views • 7 months ago

Caitlin Clark on handling pressure: "This is like such a privilege and honor to be here. I don't worry about all that. Like I'm just excited to go play basketball. I remain confident in what I can do. And that's one of the first messages Coach Kara told our group when we first got together, when we got here, is like, be confident in your abilities, no matter how many minutes you get, whether you're starting, whether you're playing a lot of minutes, whether that's from game to game, like no matter what, you gotta remain the same player and bring what you can bring to this team...at the end of the day, we have one goal and that's to win gold, and you're gonna do whatever you can to help the team. So that's always what I try to remind myself of, but I don't look at the pressure as a negative. Like I think that's a really cool thing and I just try to enjoy it as much as I can"
0:51

Caitlin Clark on handling pressure: "This is like such a privilege and honor to be here. I don't worry about all that. Like I'm just excited to go play basketball. I remain confident in what I can do. And that's one of the first messages Coach Kara told our group when we first got together, when we got here, is like, be confident in your abilities, no matter how many minutes you get, whether you're starting, whether you're playing a lot of minutes, whether that's from game to game, like no matter what, you gotta remain the same player and bring what you can bring to this team...at the end of the day, we have one goal and that's to win gold, and you're gonna do whatever you can to help the team. So that's always what I try to remind myself of, but I don't look at the pressure as a negative. Like I think that's a really cool thing and I just try to enjoy it as much as I can"

Oh No He Didn't

49,587 views • 17 days ago

Sandro Mamukelashvili on what his priorities are if he decides to become a free agent this summer: “I think a lot of people don’t know this, but last year, I got offered a lot of money to play for other teams.” “To me, the main priority is: I’m a basketball player, I’m a competitor, I want to win, and I want to be part of something.” “This summer will be the same thing, kind of understanding where I fit best, and what role I can play. Hopefully, it’s going to be here.” “I really want to be back. I love Toronto, I love the people, I love the organization, and coach Darko. I think he was a guy who gave me a chance to go out there and be myself.” “I really believe that there is so much more I can do and better I can get.” “I think the main thing is, understanding that I belong here, and I can be an NBA player, NBA rotational guy. I just want to keep it that way, and I want the best possible way to go out there and get better next year.”
1:10

Sandro Mamukelashvili on what his priorities are if he decides to become a free agent this summer: “I think a lot of people don’t know this, but last year, I got offered a lot of money to play for other teams.” “To me, the main priority is: I’m a basketball player, I’m a competitor, I want to win, and I want to be part of something.” “This summer will be the same thing, kind of understanding where I fit best, and what role I can play. Hopefully, it’s going to be here.” “I really want to be back. I love Toronto, I love the people, I love the organization, and coach Darko. I think he was a guy who gave me a chance to go out there and be myself.” “I really believe that there is so much more I can do and better I can get.” “I think the main thing is, understanding that I belong here, and I can be an NBA player, NBA rotational guy. I just want to keep it that way, and I want the best possible way to go out there and get better next year.”

Omer Osman

230,656 views • 4 months ago

Democrats and their mainstream media say Elon Musk has taken over our Government and is doing whatever he wants Does this sound like someone who is power hungry and taking over? Elon Musk “Things I wanna be clear is like, I am looking for feedback. So it's not like I'm just going open loop here and doing whatever I want to do. I kind of wanna know what, what do the people want and what should we do? And, and then do it — as opposed to me just deciding on my own. But we also want to have extreme transparency, so like no shady back room deals or whatever, everything done in open total exposure. Like you can see the mistakes that are made, the good things that are done. You can comment on it, you can, you know, raise concerns. This is, we, we want to transparent, open government feedback, loop engaged. Transparency is key. Let's make decisions together, not in the shadows.“
0:43

Democrats and their mainstream media say Elon Musk has taken over our Government and is doing whatever he wants Does this sound like someone who is power hungry and taking over? Elon Musk “Things I wanna be clear is like, I am looking for feedback. So it's not like I'm just going open loop here and doing whatever I want to do. I kind of wanna know what, what do the people want and what should we do? And, and then do it — as opposed to me just deciding on my own. But we also want to have extreme transparency, so like no shady back room deals or whatever, everything done in open total exposure. Like you can see the mistakes that are made, the good things that are done. You can comment on it, you can, you know, raise concerns. This is, we, we want to transparent, open government feedback, loop engaged. Transparency is key. Let's make decisions together, not in the shadows.“

Wall Street Apes

155,292 views • 1 year ago