ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

Find Square Roots Easily ๐Ÿ™

83,444 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

10 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

Ayush Jain ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Ayush Jain1 ๅนดๅ‰

@ATesCoder

Aaditya Nair ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Aaditya Nair ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ1 ๅนดๅ‰

It's Newton-Raphson algorithm. Works on any natural or irrational number with chances of 1 -1.5% error. To get closer to actual value one can go for another iteration of the same algorithm.

Sambalpur, Odisha ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Sambalpur, Odisha ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ1 ๅนดๅ‰

Which pen you're using, Sir ? @simplifieddd

Bolde Bhai ๐Ÿ˜ถ ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Bolde Bhai ๐Ÿ˜ถ1 ๅนดๅ‰

๐Ÿ‘

dreamer ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
dreamer1 ๅนดๅ‰

Nice ๐Ÿ‘

Rohan N ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Rohan N1 ๅนดๅ‰

The calculation is still wrong. With this method you will get 4.385 as the answer whereas the actual square root of 19 is 4.358.

Sandhya Joshi ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Sandhya Joshi1 ๅนดๅ‰

@grok why does it feel wrong?

Grok ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Grok1 ๅนดๅ‰

The "Crazy Math Trick" for square roots, likely based on Newton's method, is a valid way to approximate square roots mentally. It feels "wrong" possibly due to unfamiliarity, as itโ€™s not commonly taught, or because it gives approximations, not exact results. For example, for 18, it yields 4.25, close to 4.2426, but for 23, it gives 4.875 versus 4.7958, a 1.65% error. Itโ€™s useful for quick estimates but less reliable for precision. If the videoโ€™s explanation was unclear, that might add to your doubt. Try practicing with numbers near perfect squares to build confidence, or use a calculator for exactness.

Atanu Das ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Atanu Das1 ๅนดๅ‰

What about cube root ?

Ashish Shrivastava ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Ashish Shrivastava1 ๅนดๅ‰

grt

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘