Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Fiona Bruce thought she had a gotcha on better campaign financing. The Question Time audience made sure it didn't go well! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 #bbcqt #bbcquestiontime #questiontime
181,849 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
34 Kommentare

100% of audience put their hand up for state funding. Fiona: "a LOT of you..."

I thought Fiona Bruce might cry after her failed attempt to mislead viewers #BBC is out of step with the UK - we fight Fascists we dont fund them

A pound a year for each person to pay to avoid undue influence in politics is a bargain.

She also phrased state funding as 'you will pay'. That is a loaded question and operationally wrong. State funding means what it says - the State funds the political parties. On the other hand, that audience has to fund the BBC in order to watch any live television.

She couldn't hide her bias if she tried.

The tone in her voice when the hands were raised she wasnt happy 😂

All these audience members are hand picked it’s ridiculous.

State funding for party campaigning would mean - retrospectively - neither Labour nor the Greens would have been given any money to campaign with, before they had MPs. Therefore no new parties could get a foothold. Only dumb audience members think this is good.

Tory run Zionist controlled @BBCNews lives in its own bubble

There’s a flaw in the concept because giving £1 per year doesn’t necessarily “preserve and protect” our democracy anyway! The whole idea is just ridiculous when you think about it for more than 1 second. All it’d do is weaponise that funding against the parties that are deemed to be a threat, i.e another route for them to try and preserve the cosy club for people who think like them.

Disappointed look from #FionaBruce-well done people power

Fiona Bruce "that's very interesting". Translated: "who the fcuk booked THIS audience"

The way she emphasises “YOU paying” and they still support it. People don’t want billionaires running our country through massive donations.

Tory Bruce at it again

Now tell them that the cost will be in the billions and see what they say. Everyone knows when it’s taxpayers money, what should be £100 cost £800. Old people are very thick. Most of the smart ones are already gone.

The face said it all 😆 🤣

What she should have said “how many would like to see their council tax increased to fund the political parties” 🤣

'that's very interesting'.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

"that's very interesting..."

Look at her face before and after…..her bias is infuriating

A pound wouldn't stop the corruption would it? ask sensible questions.

She’s such a twat

I despise this bitch

Bruce ‘No Likey’ 🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

State funding for policitical parties? Political parties are the problem - that's why we have war and zionism

The tv licence is no longer fit for purpose.

A novel solution would be that you can only vote in a general election if you donate a fixed X amount (e.g. £5) to a political party after the next general election (Use existing rules for the next one), you can volunteer to donate more upto Y amount

Did you see the one person they asked for a question on climate change? 21 year old who didn't want to start a family because he thinks the world is going to end.

State funded donations. And who exactly would decide what party would got what. One thing is certain it would wipe out any chance of an emerging party getting a seat.

I’d pay a pond

Fiona Bruce "That's very Interesting" ! That's Democracy .

Oof

Poor question - should have asked are they willing to fund people who have the completely opposite point of view to them.
