正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Firing upon a shipwreck is a textbook example of an illegal order that shouldn't be followed — one straight out of our military's own Law of War Manual. But with Pete Hegseth's alleged order to 'kill them all,’ Donald Trump's unconstitutional strikes near Venezuela are now potentially a war crime.

Senator Adam Schiff

3,399,586 subscribers

132,507 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

So it turns out that the so called. ‘Seditious’ Democratic lawmakers who were reminding active service members that they should only follow LEGAL orders, were providing a valuable public service. Because ‘kill them all’ without legal justification is AN ILLEGAL ORDER. It’s the type of order for which Putin is now an indicted war criminal. The fact is that those who fired the missiles on those ‘alleged’ not ‘proven’ drug smugglers are now guilty under international law of ‘alleged’ war crimes as a result of following the orders of an ‘alleged’ war criminal. Brenna Perez will explain. 🎥 TikTok -

So it turns out that the so called. ‘Seditious’ Democratic lawmakers who were reminding active service members that they should only follow LEGAL orders, were providing a valuable public service. Because ‘kill them all’ without legal justification is AN ILLEGAL ORDER. It’s the type of order for which Putin is now an indicted war criminal. The fact is that those who fired the missiles on those ‘alleged’ not ‘proven’ drug smugglers are now guilty under international law of ‘alleged’ war crimes as a result of following the orders of an ‘alleged’ war criminal. Brenna Perez will explain. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

61,440 次观看 • 10 个月前

Q: You said that second strike was in accordance with the law of armed conflict, but the Navy's own manual says that firing on survivors from a wrecked vessel is an example of a war crime LEAVITT: I would reiterate that the strike was conducted in accordance with the law of armed conflict

Q: You said that second strike was in accordance with the law of armed conflict, but the Navy's own manual says that firing on survivors from a wrecked vessel is an example of a war crime LEAVITT: I would reiterate that the strike was conducted in accordance with the law of armed conflict

Aaron Rupar

70,544 次观看 • 10 个月前

Let's be clear — an order to give "no quarter" means to take no prisoners and execute soldiers who try to surrender. It is a violation of the law of war and the Geneva Conventions. As a former Army JAG who trained soldiers on the law of war, it is clear that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth must go.

Let's be clear — an order to give "no quarter" means to take no prisoners and execute soldiers who try to surrender. It is a violation of the law of war and the Geneva Conventions. As a former Army JAG who trained soldiers on the law of war, it is clear that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth must go.

Congressman Eugene Vindman

59,708 次观看 • 6 个月前

“No quarter" is a war crime under international law, meaning it is illegal to refuse to spare the lives of those who surrender or are unable to fight. Refusing an illegal order is not insubordination, it is a legal DUTY made sacred by the blood of those who secured it.

“No quarter" is a war crime under international law, meaning it is illegal to refuse to spare the lives of those who surrender or are unable to fight. Refusing an illegal order is not insubordination, it is a legal DUTY made sacred by the blood of those who secured it.

Bryan Dawson🇺🇸

211,719 次观看 • 10 个月前

VIDEO: Watch US Secretary of WAR Tell Our Military That It Won’t Be Him Going to War But Rather it Will Be Them. “You’re Ready to Put Them in a Position Where They’re Going to Get Killed Fighting an Illegal War of Aggression, PETE!” Rex Jones 🔴PEEP THE LIVESTREAM!⬇️

VIDEO: Watch US Secretary of WAR Tell Our Military That It Won’t Be Him Going to War But Rather it Will Be Them. “You’re Ready to Put Them in a Position Where They’re Going to Get Killed Fighting an Illegal War of Aggression, PETE!” Rex Jones 🔴PEEP THE LIVESTREAM!⬇️

Alex Jones Network

14,446 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chris Murphy: "It won't be the billionaire children of Donald Trump and his buddies that die. It's going to be the children of middle class and poor families all across this country that are gonna die for a war of choice, a war of vanity, an illegal war."

Chris Murphy: "It won't be the billionaire children of Donald Trump and his buddies that die. It's going to be the children of middle class and poor families all across this country that are gonna die for a war of choice, a war of vanity, an illegal war."

Aaron Rupar

845,058 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 "It was a war that DIDN’T EXIST, that Trump created. Yes, congratulations, he ended his own war, but that is an example of a war-making president. That's just one example." Glenn Greenwald debates 20 MAGA loyalists on whether Trump is a war-making president or a peace-making one.

🚨 "It was a war that DIDN’T EXIST, that Trump created. Yes, congratulations, he ended his own war, but that is an example of a war-making president. That's just one example." Glenn Greenwald debates 20 MAGA loyalists on whether Trump is a war-making president or a peace-making one.

System Update

67,925 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ War on Iran: Pentagon Whistleblower Wes Bryant SLAMS Trump Administration’s RECKLESS Bombing of Civilians How has War Secretary Pete Hegseth deliberately enacted a policy of tolerating more civilian fatalities? What is behind Trump's and Hegseth's revelling in death and destruction in Iran? Why is the US military following Hegseth's 'immoral, unconstitutional, and illegal' orders? All this and more on this episode with Wes J. Bryant - Former Pentagon | War Analyst, Former Pentagon Chief of Civilian Harm Assessments.

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ War on Iran: Pentagon Whistleblower Wes Bryant SLAMS Trump Administration’s RECKLESS Bombing of Civilians How has War Secretary Pete Hegseth deliberately enacted a policy of tolerating more civilian fatalities? What is behind Trump's and Hegseth's revelling in death and destruction in Iran? Why is the US military following Hegseth's 'immoral, unconstitutional, and illegal' orders? All this and more on this episode with Wes J. Bryant - Former Pentagon | War Analyst, Former Pentagon Chief of Civilian Harm Assessments.

Going Underground

97,400 次观看 • 5 个月前

Steve Bannon, one of Trump's closest associates: "Mossad, by spreading the story of an alleged plot to assassinate Trump, is trying to mislead him again, in order to create a pretext for starting a new war, which this time could escalate into a ground invasion."

Steve Bannon, one of Trump's closest associates: "Mossad, by spreading the story of an alleged plot to assassinate Trump, is trying to mislead him again, in order to create a pretext for starting a new war, which this time could escalate into a ground invasion."

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

13,370 次观看 • 2 个月前

Trump’s illegal strikes in the Caribbean and Pacific now have a death toll of over 80. With looming threats of land strikes in Venezuela, Trump is trying to start a new, pointless forever war. I’m doing all I can to stop him.

Trump’s illegal strikes in the Caribbean and Pacific now have a death toll of over 80. With looming threats of land strikes in Venezuela, Trump is trying to start a new, pointless forever war. I’m doing all I can to stop him.

Senator Tim Kaine

198,022 次观看 • 10 个月前

"The days of gut over your belt with curved gig lines are over; if you can't be fit, find a new job." Carl Higbie reacts to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's War Department address.

"The days of gut over your belt with curved gig lines are over; if you can't be fit, find a new job." Carl Higbie reacts to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's War Department address.

NEWSMAX

127,521 次观看 • 1 年前

Pete Hegseth's right-hand man: There had long been this idea that Trump and his administration were abandoning the post-World War II order, and that's just wrong. What the administration is really doing is moving on from the post-Cold War order. Actually, in a lot of ways, we're going back to the Cold War, going back to the basics of building military readiness.

Pete Hegseth's right-hand man: There had long been this idea that Trump and his administration were abandoning the post-World War II order, and that's just wrong. What the administration is really doing is moving on from the post-Cold War order. Actually, in a lot of ways, we're going back to the Cold War, going back to the basics of building military readiness.

Headquarters

64,999 次观看 • 2 个月前

Pete Hegseth allegedly ordering a restrike on men clinging to burning wreckage isn’t “tough leadership,” it’s the textbook definition of a potential war crime under the laws of armed conflict. And now the White House is refusing to comment on the reports that Hegseth gave the order to target “survivors who were clinging onto wreckage.”

Pete Hegseth allegedly ordering a restrike on men clinging to burning wreckage isn’t “tough leadership,” it’s the textbook definition of a potential war crime under the laws of armed conflict. And now the White House is refusing to comment on the reports that Hegseth gave the order to target “survivors who were clinging onto wreckage.”

Brian Allen

251,621 次观看 • 10 个月前

.James Talarico: It should be troubling to all of us that the most powerful politicians and corporate executives are working together to sell out the First Amendment. They are selling out our freedom of speech in order to protect their own power and their own wealth. An attack on any one of our First Amendment rights is an attack on all of our First Amendment rights — whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, a progressive or a conservative, this should be concerning to all of us.

.James Talarico: It should be troubling to all of us that the most powerful politicians and corporate executives are working together to sell out the First Amendment. They are selling out our freedom of speech in order to protect their own power and their own wealth. An attack on any one of our First Amendment rights is an attack on all of our First Amendment rights — whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, a progressive or a conservative, this should be concerning to all of us.

Team Talarico

199,701 次观看 • 7 个月前