正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
First I optimized CPU, then memory, now I'm onto the renderers (Metal first). Scrolling Neovim now sustains ~175fps easily (vsync off of course). More room for improvement, but this is already best-in-class (I can't find a terminal at the moment that does better on macOS). The road to get... show more
10 条评论
More FPS means less CPU spent on single frames, right? Scaling that to 100k-s of users means less energy used in general. Every watt counts. Doing your part for the <2°C goal. Or am i too optimistic here why optimizations matter? 😉
Haha, well, the first part is right. :) CPU usage for both idle and saturated screen changes is significantly lower. Whether that'll make any sort of meaningful difference... well... lol.
I need Ghostty in my life. Patiently awaiting my day in Discord
Let's goooo!
Very nice! Must look really nice on a high frequency display when scrolling backbuffer with pixel increments
High FPS in terminal does matter. Anyone who asks why doesn't get it.jpg.
dope results! out of curiosity, is that monitor helper in the right side something you developed yourself to debug?
Nope, just run any program that uses Metal with `MTL_HUD_ENABLED=1`. Its built-in to macOS.
FPS does totally matter. I quit neovim for vscode because how slow redrawing was in the terminal and how every plugin was competing with each other.
If you ever go back to neovim, `set notermsync` is a huge thing too. This prevents internal escape sequence buffering. May result in tearing depending on the terminal but for fast terminals (like Ghostty!) it dramatically improves fps and latency.
![Michael referred to TraderRoundUp in NQ Futures Review & 1st Presented Reflection FVG. Here are the spaces and timestamps about the first presented reflection fair value gap and the first presented fair value gap with displacement :) Trader Round Up Part 2 - May 3, 2025 [ First Presented Reflection FvG ] Timestamp 01:27:19 Question charter student “I would think that it's worth identifying, not just the first bisi but also the first sibi. I mean, I just to me, it's just so beautiful to codify and see both of those arrays. Because logically, as a charter student, that's how I would perceive you seeing it?” Timestamp 01:27:43 Answer from Michael “Well, I'll come out and say, I'll tell you, you are talking about a PD Array that I've never released. But it is, it's, there's something to it. When you see the very first presented fair value gap, whatever it is, whatever the contrary is to that, the very first formation of that, it's useful information.” — Trader Round Up: Post ICT Livestream 3/19 - March 19, 2026 [ Displacement for First Presented Fair Value Gaps ] Timestamp 01:01:51 “And then I look for that displacement in that fair value gap. So it's not to simply, there's a gap there it's the first one that happened. That's not enough for me. I'm actually teaching the whole process of what I did was, when I discovered this element of first presentation, this whole process of which one do I use and how do I define that and what rules and parameters, how did that morph into what I use today? When I first saw the concept, it was simply pick the first one. If you do, you'll see many trades form, but sometimes you won't get a signal for others, and that'll be a source of frustration for you like it was for me, but you'll grow through that. By learning to anticipate what you think the market's going to do, then looking for it to displace in that narrative, in that direction, supporting that trade idea, that's what I use it for. So it's the first presented fair value gap that fits the narrative and the criteria I'm looking for within my model.” Timestamp 01:04:33 “So it's not just simply, here's the first gap that forms. It's the first gap that forms within the context of the expectation I hold over price action, which is narrative.” ————————————————————————— Expanded context Trader Round Up: Post ICT Livestream 3/19 - March 19, 2026 [ Displacement for First Presented Fair Value Gaps ] Timestamp 01:01:26 “My selection for Fair Value Gaps are directly linked to gradient levels based on inefficiencies and ranges that I've defined, that I've been teaching this year. Also, I already have a predetermined expectation on what I want to see price action do. In other words, I have a draw on liquidity, I have a narrative I think it may try to implement framing that first hour of trading. And then I look for that displacement in that fair value gap. So it's not to simply, there's a gap there it's the first one that happened. That's not enough for me. I'm actually teaching the whole process of what I did was, when I discovered this element of first presentation, this whole process of which one do I use and how do I define that and what rules and parameters, how did that morph into what I use today? When I first saw the concept, it was simply pick the first one. If you do, you'll see many trades form, but sometimes you won't get a signal for others, and that'll be a source of frustration for you like it was for me, but you'll grow through that. By learning to anticipate what you think the market's going to do, then looking for it to displace in that narrative, in that direction, supporting that trade idea, that's what I use it for. So it's the first presented fair value gap that fits the narrative and the criteria I'm looking for within my model. That's the technical term in terminology, and it's the definition you're going to see in the book. So you got it for free here. I gave it right to you, but that's what I'm doing. I'm taking everything and placing them in the right place at the right time, and that's why I'm using the fair value gaps that I say is first presented, and that's why they're working the way they do. There's more criteria than simply that it's first appeared.” Timestamp 01:03:19 Not necessarily bias. Narrative is not bias. Narrative is how a price delivery will unfold. In other words, if you think it's going to go higher, it may go down and take out a short-term low before it does that. It may trade down into a discount fair value gap before going higher. If I'm bullish, I'm looking for a criteria that allows for either the first presented fair value gap to perform as an inversion fair value gap. So I'm bullish, if I see the first presented fair value gap with displacement that's going to be a SIBI, In other words, it's a down-closed candle, in my mind already, it's fitting criteria that this is going to act as an inversion fair value gap. So now I'm going to wait for it to trade above it, come back down, validate that inversion fair value gap, keep price out of the lower half of it. That means I'm onside. Order flow is signaling to me that I am bullish. I can go long at consequent encroachment or up to its high, anywhere in there. But if it spikes a candlestick wick down in there, I won't be fearful of not taking that trade once it validates it. Once it comes back down, it can do that. It's completely permissible as long as the bodies stay out of it. And I'll just keep parlaying and building the position up as long as I have the equity to do so. And then I'll just ride it up to whatever the draw is on liquidity. So it's not just simply, here's the first gap that forms. It's the first gap that forms within the context of the expectation I hold over price action, which is narrative. The bias, I'm actually trading outside of bias because I'm trading only in the first hour of trading. I don't need a bias. I have zero bias lately because I don't trust higher timeframe bias because we're in this larger long-term consolidation. So by removing the necessity for knowing bias, I'm just looking for what's the current narrative right now, where they're going to run for, who they're going to hurt right now. And that's what I'm doing. When we move to a trending environment again, then I'll go back to doing other things."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2098135033949176269/amplify_video_thumb/2098133563317075973/img/HDHt9vs_KEzWwK5e.jpg)
