正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

First, LGBTQ identity cannot be used to justify or excuse inappropriate physical contact. Sexual orientation is part of a person’s identity, but it is unrelated to behavioral boundaries. In any public or professional setting, physical interaction must always be based on clear consent and established rules, not justified by... identity, familiarity, or personal relationships. Second, framing public criticism as “fans being jealous” is a distortion of the issue and a deflection from the core point. The focus of public concern has never been competition or emotional conflict, but whether basic professional standards and boundaries were respected. Reducing legitimate concerns to “jealousy” is a way of avoiding accountability. At its core, this issue is not about identity labels or public sentiment, but about a fundamental principle: all interactions must be based on respect for boundaries and clear consent. When this principle is ignored or blurred, public concern is both reasonable and necessary.show more

T’Amore_Stay With Namtan

1,325 subscribers

223,066 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is absolutely devasting to watch. The criteria for a public inquiry is very, very simple and clear: • Public Concern – The issue must be of significant public interest. • Serious Failing – It involves major failures in public bodies, governance, or safety. • Accountability – There is a need to establish responsibility and learn lessons. All of the above apply to David Amess’ death by a terrorist who left the Prevent programme early. Sir David Amess’ will never receive justice until the government hold a public inquiry. It’s increasingly clear that this is a thinly guised cover-up.

This is absolutely devasting to watch. The criteria for a public inquiry is very, very simple and clear: • Public Concern – The issue must be of significant public interest. • Serious Failing – It involves major failures in public bodies, governance, or safety. • Accountability – There is a need to establish responsibility and learn lessons. All of the above apply to David Amess’ death by a terrorist who left the Prevent programme early. Sir David Amess’ will never receive justice until the government hold a public inquiry. It’s increasingly clear that this is a thinly guised cover-up.

Alex Armstrong

50,354 次观看 • 1 年前

When basic expressions of faith need permission in workplaces and even examination halls, it raises serious questions about boundaries. It is disappointing to see such situations where companies introduce policies that restrict personal expressions of belief. Reports around Lenskart suggested that wearing a kalava or tilak required permission or was limited, though later clarification stated that such rules had already been removed. But the larger question remains. What is the actual issue with something like a kalava or tilak? How does it impact work or professionalism? This is not just about one company. It raises a broader concern about whether individuals should be asked to compromise on their personal or religious identity for jobs or exams. Respect should be consistent. If something feels unacceptable in one context, it should be treated the same way across all. Jai Hind.Jai Bharat 🇮🇳

When basic expressions of faith need permission in workplaces and even examination halls, it raises serious questions about boundaries. It is disappointing to see such situations where companies introduce policies that restrict personal expressions of belief. Reports around Lenskart suggested that wearing a kalava or tilak required permission or was limited, though later clarification stated that such rules had already been removed. But the larger question remains. What is the actual issue with something like a kalava or tilak? How does it impact work or professionalism? This is not just about one company. It raises a broader concern about whether individuals should be asked to compromise on their personal or religious identity for jobs or exams. Respect should be consistent. If something feels unacceptable in one context, it should be treated the same way across all. Jai Hind.Jai Bharat 🇮🇳

Praffulgarg

20,744 次观看 • 4 个月前

Another angle of the Karnaprayag clash appears to show sharp swords being used while others were engaged in a physical fight with their hands. Respect for faith and religious traditions is non-negotiable. But that cannot prevent a serious discussion about carrying sharp weapons in public spaces when they can be used during moments of anger and conflict. No disagreement should escalate to the point where blades enter the equation. The law must be equal for everyone, regardless of identity, religion or background.

Another angle of the Karnaprayag clash appears to show sharp swords being used while others were engaged in a physical fight with their hands. Respect for faith and religious traditions is non-negotiable. But that cannot prevent a serious discussion about carrying sharp weapons in public spaces when they can be used during moments of anger and conflict. No disagreement should escalate to the point where blades enter the equation. The law must be equal for everyone, regardless of identity, religion or background.

Kumaon Jagran

248,380 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 14 WITHOUT REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE GROUNDS - BREACHING SECTION 17🚨 This is the second time in less than one week the Police have done this to me. Metropolitan Police sort your minions out. Anyone (whether a journalist or a member of the public) has the legal right to observe, record and report protests. Press ID is NOT required to exercise this right. 📜 The law is clear: • Public Order Act 1986, Section 14 - Police may impose conditions on a protest only if they reasonably believe there is a risk of: • serious public disorder • serious damage to property • serious disruption to the life of the community • intimidation intended to compel lawful actions. These powers must be applied on reasonable and proportionate grounds - not arbitrarily. •Public Order Act 2023, Section 17 - A constable must not exercise any power for the sole purpose of preventing someone from observing or reporting on a protest, or from monitoring the police themselves. •Met Police guidance confirms: “Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places, and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel.” 👉🏼 Using Section 14 to silence coverage or deter citizen journalists, without lawful justification is an abuse of power that undermines both press freedom and democratic accountability. 🛑 Intimidation ≠ Law 📷 Recording a protest is not a crime 📝 Citizen journalism is protected #RightToReport #PressFreedom #Section14 #Section17 #Accountability

🚨POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 14 WITHOUT REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE GROUNDS - BREACHING SECTION 17🚨 This is the second time in less than one week the Police have done this to me. Metropolitan Police sort your minions out. Anyone (whether a journalist or a member of the public) has the legal right to observe, record and report protests. Press ID is NOT required to exercise this right. 📜 The law is clear: • Public Order Act 1986, Section 14 - Police may impose conditions on a protest only if they reasonably believe there is a risk of: • serious public disorder • serious damage to property • serious disruption to the life of the community • intimidation intended to compel lawful actions. These powers must be applied on reasonable and proportionate grounds - not arbitrarily. •Public Order Act 2023, Section 17 - A constable must not exercise any power for the sole purpose of preventing someone from observing or reporting on a protest, or from monitoring the police themselves. •Met Police guidance confirms: “Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places, and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel.” 👉🏼 Using Section 14 to silence coverage or deter citizen journalists, without lawful justification is an abuse of power that undermines both press freedom and democratic accountability. 🛑 Intimidation ≠ Law 📷 Recording a protest is not a crime 📝 Citizen journalism is protected #RightToReport #PressFreedom #Section14 #Section17 #Accountability

Martin Gauci

28,412 次观看 • 11 个月前

🇮🇷 “Religion has its place, but it cannot be part of the public or political sphere. That separation is a precondition for democracy. The choice must be free. If tomorrow an Iranian woman wants to wear the veil or not, that is her personal decision.” — Reza Pahlavi

🇮🇷 “Religion has its place, but it cannot be part of the public or political sphere. That separation is a precondition for democracy. The choice must be free. If tomorrow an Iranian woman wants to wear the veil or not, that is her personal decision.” — Reza Pahlavi

Lord Bebo

28,232 次观看 • 6 个月前

This is the Kumpo a sacred, mystical figure of the Jola (Diola) people in Casamance, The Gambia, and Guinea-Bissau. Believed to be a forest spirit, not human, its identity must never be questioned or revealed.

This is the Kumpo a sacred, mystical figure of the Jola (Diola) people in Casamance, The Gambia, and Guinea-Bissau. Believed to be a forest spirit, not human, its identity must never be questioned or revealed.

The Kenyan Vigilante

59,701 次观看 • 7 个月前

Pause and really let this sink in. The United Kingdom’s Home Secretary just went on live national television and declared that English people do not exist. She described “English” not as a nationality or people, but as some kind of feeling or identity that anyone, from anywhere in the world, can simply adopt. This is not a slip of the tongue. This is the active erasure of an entire native people and their identity—on public record, in their own country. The British are being erased.

Pause and really let this sink in. The United Kingdom’s Home Secretary just went on live national television and declared that English people do not exist. She described “English” not as a nationality or people, but as some kind of feeling or identity that anyone, from anywhere in the world, can simply adopt. This is not a slip of the tongue. This is the active erasure of an entire native people and their identity—on public record, in their own country. The British are being erased.

Ian Miles Cheong

199,363 次观看 • 5 个月前

Kamala Harris: A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election we accept the results. And anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it. At the same, we owe loyalty not to a president or a party but to the constitution

Kamala Harris: A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election we accept the results. And anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it. At the same, we owe loyalty not to a president or a party but to the constitution

Acyn

453,607 次观看 • 1 年前

We must be very clear, nursing is not a business. It is a calling of a well respected responsibility to uphold the health, safety, and dignity of every citizen. When profit overtakes principle, when business interests overshadow public safety, we as lawmakers must intervene. WM

We must be very clear, nursing is not a business. It is a calling of a well respected responsibility to uphold the health, safety, and dignity of every citizen. When profit overtakes principle, when business interests overshadow public safety, we as lawmakers must intervene. WM

Inna Hengari, MP

13,055 次观看 • 1 年前

Powell: The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the federal reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public rather than following the preferences of the president This is about whether the fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.

Powell: The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the federal reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public rather than following the preferences of the president This is about whether the fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.

Acyn

409,126 次观看 • 7 个月前

I don't know what's changed but 5 days of clear skies has not happened here for YEARS Whatever it is... Venezuela or whatever But LONG may it continue!!!!! This is just it always used to be . Whether rainy , windy or the odd grey day The skies were clear or with normal cloud And what a difference it makes

I don't know what's changed but 5 days of clear skies has not happened here for YEARS Whatever it is... Venezuela or whatever But LONG may it continue!!!!! This is just it always used to be . Whether rainy , windy or the odd grey day The skies were clear or with normal cloud And what a difference it makes

@ChatsWithEm

16,929 次观看 • 7 个月前

Forcing a vaccine, or any medical intervention, on another human being is a violation of the fundamental right to bodily autonomy. And when people say, “No one is forcing you”: If a child cannot attend school without complying, cannot go to summer camp, cannot participate in sports, or is excluded from ordinary life because their parents declined a medical intervention, that is not meaningful consent. It is coercion. Consent obtained under threat of exclusion, punishment or loss of opportunity is not freely given consent. Medical decisions belong to individuals and families. Not schools, employers, corporations or the state. There should never be a penalty attached to saying no, PERIOD.

Forcing a vaccine, or any medical intervention, on another human being is a violation of the fundamental right to bodily autonomy. And when people say, “No one is forcing you”: If a child cannot attend school without complying, cannot go to summer camp, cannot participate in sports, or is excluded from ordinary life because their parents declined a medical intervention, that is not meaningful consent. It is coercion. Consent obtained under threat of exclusion, punishment or loss of opportunity is not freely given consent. Medical decisions belong to individuals and families. Not schools, employers, corporations or the state. There should never be a penalty attached to saying no, PERIOD.

Children’s Health Defense

71,439 次观看 • 5 天前

Horrific. Absolutely horrific. The idea that anyone is trying to reframe pedophilia as some kind of “new sexual orientation” is beyond disturbing. This is not about inclusion, and it is not about rights — it is about the protection of children. “Pedophilia is simply just another sexuaI orientation. We need to overcome our negative feelings we have towards them and treat them with respect..” No. Being sexually attracted to children is not an identity to be embraced or normalized. It is a serious and harmful disorder that demands therapy, treatment, and strict boundaries to ensure no child is ever harmed. Children are not a category for adult desire. They are vulnerable human beings who deserve safety, innocence, and protection — not exploitation disguised as “acceptance.” This is a line that must never be crossed. Thankyou Lila Rose for this information 🙏

Horrific. Absolutely horrific. The idea that anyone is trying to reframe pedophilia as some kind of “new sexual orientation” is beyond disturbing. This is not about inclusion, and it is not about rights — it is about the protection of children. “Pedophilia is simply just another sexuaI orientation. We need to overcome our negative feelings we have towards them and treat them with respect..” No. Being sexually attracted to children is not an identity to be embraced or normalized. It is a serious and harmful disorder that demands therapy, treatment, and strict boundaries to ensure no child is ever harmed. Children are not a category for adult desire. They are vulnerable human beings who deserve safety, innocence, and protection — not exploitation disguised as “acceptance.” This is a line that must never be crossed. Thankyou Lila Rose for this information 🙏

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

16,119 次观看 • 5 个月前

The decision by ABC, CNN, and NBC not to carry President Trump’s primetime address on election security raises a fundamental question about the role of major broadcast networks in a democracy. This was a nationally announced speech by a sitting, duly elected president on the integrity of U.S. elections. An issue that affects every voter, regardless of party. This is not about liking or disliking Trump, or agreeing or disagreeing with his claims. The presidency is the highest elected office in the country. When a president addresses the nation in a formal, scheduled primetime speech, there is a strong public‑interest argument that news networks should air it live and in full. Citizens can’t evaluate their leaders, or their claims, if they aren’t allowed to hear those leaders directly. Editorial judgment and criticism remain essential. Networks are entirely within their rights to add clear disclaimers before and after the address, fact‑check in real time or immediately afterward, host panels that challenge, contextualize, or rebut the president’s statements. But substituting that for the speech itself, showing only handpicked clips, summaries, or commentary, shifts from informing the public to curating what the public is permitted to see. At that point, viewers are reacting to the networks’ framing, not to the president’s actual words. Even after being censored in the U.S., having its license revoked and facing sanctions, RT International chose to air the address in full. RT has publicly disagreed with the president’s policies and with parts of this speech, but it treated the event as a matter of public record. Our principle is simple: viewers should be able to watch the complete address in context, hear the arguments unedited, and then weigh both the speech and the subsequent criticism for themselves. Rather than having corporate media gatekeepers decide in advance which presidential messages are fit for broadcast.

The decision by ABC, CNN, and NBC not to carry President Trump’s primetime address on election security raises a fundamental question about the role of major broadcast networks in a democracy. This was a nationally announced speech by a sitting, duly elected president on the integrity of U.S. elections. An issue that affects every voter, regardless of party. This is not about liking or disliking Trump, or agreeing or disagreeing with his claims. The presidency is the highest elected office in the country. When a president addresses the nation in a formal, scheduled primetime speech, there is a strong public‑interest argument that news networks should air it live and in full. Citizens can’t evaluate their leaders, or their claims, if they aren’t allowed to hear those leaders directly. Editorial judgment and criticism remain essential. Networks are entirely within their rights to add clear disclaimers before and after the address, fact‑check in real time or immediately afterward, host panels that challenge, contextualize, or rebut the president’s statements. But substituting that for the speech itself, showing only handpicked clips, summaries, or commentary, shifts from informing the public to curating what the public is permitted to see. At that point, viewers are reacting to the networks’ framing, not to the president’s actual words. Even after being censored in the U.S., having its license revoked and facing sanctions, RT International chose to air the address in full. RT has publicly disagreed with the president’s policies and with parts of this speech, but it treated the event as a matter of public record. Our principle is simple: viewers should be able to watch the complete address in context, hear the arguments unedited, and then weigh both the speech and the subsequent criticism for themselves. Rather than having corporate media gatekeepers decide in advance which presidential messages are fit for broadcast.

Ben Swann

1,177,424 次观看 • 1 个月前

A burning cross is not a prank. It is not a misunderstanding. It is one of the most recognizable symbols of racial terror in American history. For generations, burning crosses were used to intimidate, threaten, and instill fear in Black communities. Seeing one set ablaze in a public park in 2026 is disturbing and unacceptable. Hate cannot be normalized, excused, or ignored. Those responsible must be identified and held accountable.

A burning cross is not a prank. It is not a misunderstanding. It is one of the most recognizable symbols of racial terror in American history. For generations, burning crosses were used to intimidate, threaten, and instill fear in Black communities. Seeing one set ablaze in a public park in 2026 is disturbing and unacceptable. Hate cannot be normalized, excused, or ignored. Those responsible must be identified and held accountable.

Ben Crump

20,558 次观看 • 2 个月前

A man's core function is to solve problems for women and children. This is the ultimate outcome of all male endeavors, from building wealth to physical conditioning. It's about capability and accountability, not comfort or validation.

A man's core function is to solve problems for women and children. This is the ultimate outcome of all male endeavors, from building wealth to physical conditioning. It's about capability and accountability, not comfort or validation.

Dre Baldwin | #WorkOnYourGame

69,666 次观看 • 3 个月前

Mass migration is not just a border issue. It is a child protection issue. Thousands of asylum applicants claim to be under 18 and are being placed into British schools with children, with no proper vetting or background checks. This is reckless and the public has every right to be alarmed.

Mass migration is not just a border issue. It is a child protection issue. Thousands of asylum applicants claim to be under 18 and are being placed into British schools with children, with no proper vetting or background checks. This is reckless and the public has every right to be alarmed.

Advance UK

29,105 次观看 • 5 个月前

Anytime there is a national issue of public concern or when there is a need to champion a cause that will benefit the Nigerians, this Pastor is one of the few who always show up or speak up for the people, the rest of the pastors in Nigeria will wait till Sunday to deceive their congregation and ask them pray for Nigeria.

Anytime there is a national issue of public concern or when there is a need to champion a cause that will benefit the Nigerians, this Pastor is one of the few who always show up or speak up for the people, the rest of the pastors in Nigeria will wait till Sunday to deceive their congregation and ask them pray for Nigeria.

Chude

10,685 次观看 • 6 个月前

In Sudan 🇸🇩, sexual violence is being used as a weapon of war. For survivors, the nightmare does not end after the trauma. When the father is unknown or cannot be identified, the babies born not only face social stigma but also new obstacles of identity.

In Sudan 🇸🇩, sexual violence is being used as a weapon of war. For survivors, the nightmare does not end after the trauma. When the father is unknown or cannot be identified, the babies born not only face social stigma but also new obstacles of identity.

BBC News Africa

49,623 次观看 • 22 天前

The mode of existence of the world can be understood as the set of its fundamental characteristics that make both its existence and its transformations possible. In other words, what basic properties must a world possess for its evolutionary existence to be possible at all? Among the key aspects, several can be identified: (a) physical space must be either finite or infinite; (b) if infinite, this infinity must be either spherical or linear; (c) physical reality must possess the capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena — which, according to our observations, it indeed does; (d) this capacity, as an active self-organizing property, must either have a beginning or be beginningless — that is, it either existed eternally, or the world was originally maximally simple and static before this property spontaneously emerged. : The author proposes that the mode of existence of the world is defined by a set of fundamental characteristics that make both its persistence and its transformations possible. In other words, for any reality capable of evolutionary development to arise, certain basic properties must be present. Physical space must be either finite or infinite. If infinite, its geometry must be either spherical or linear. Physical reality must possess the inherent capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena, as we observe in our own universe. Finally, this self-organizing property must either have existed eternally or have emerged spontaneously at a certain moment from an originally simple and static state. This framework invites us to consider the minimal conditions required for a universe like ours to evolve intelligence and complexity. It frames the question of cosmic origins not as a mystery of creation from nothing, but as an inquiry into the necessary and sufficient properties of matter and space that allow reality to unfold as it has.

The mode of existence of the world can be understood as the set of its fundamental characteristics that make both its existence and its transformations possible. In other words, what basic properties must a world possess for its evolutionary existence to be possible at all? Among the key aspects, several can be identified: (a) physical space must be either finite or infinite; (b) if infinite, this infinity must be either spherical or linear; (c) physical reality must possess the capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena — which, according to our observations, it indeed does; (d) this capacity, as an active self-organizing property, must either have a beginning or be beginningless — that is, it either existed eternally, or the world was originally maximally simple and static before this property spontaneously emerged. : The author proposes that the mode of existence of the world is defined by a set of fundamental characteristics that make both its persistence and its transformations possible. In other words, for any reality capable of evolutionary development to arise, certain basic properties must be present. Physical space must be either finite or infinite. If infinite, its geometry must be either spherical or linear. Physical reality must possess the inherent capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena, as we observe in our own universe. Finally, this self-organizing property must either have existed eternally or have emerged spontaneously at a certain moment from an originally simple and static state. This framework invites us to consider the minimal conditions required for a universe like ours to evolve intelligence and complexity. It frames the question of cosmic origins not as a mystery of creation from nothing, but as an inquiry into the necessary and sufficient properties of matter and space that allow reality to unfold as it has.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

1,851,902 次观看 • 6 个月前