正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

FISA 702 just passed the House with zero reforms. This bill allows the government to access Americans’ private communications without a warrant, in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment protections. As the government lays the groundwork for spying, its allies in private corporations are rapidly rolling out consumer-grade surveillance... show more

Redacted

300,262 subscribers

27,688 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The FBI just acknowledged that the federal government buys Americans' location data in its testimony to the Senate Select Subcommittee on Intelligence. This is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment and is why I introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act - to close the data broker loophole that allows intelligence agencies to buy Americans' private data.

The FBI just acknowledged that the federal government buys Americans' location data in its testimony to the Senate Select Subcommittee on Intelligence. This is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment and is why I introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act - to close the data broker loophole that allows intelligence agencies to buy Americans' private data.

Rep. Warren Davidson

327,686 次观看 • 5 个月前

Section 702 lets the government access private communications without a warrant. Millions of Americans’ emails, messages, and other data are swept up under the guise of foreign intelligence.

Section 702 lets the government access private communications without a warrant. Millions of Americans’ emails, messages, and other data are swept up under the guise of foreign intelligence.

Congressman Brandon Gill

27,335 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elizabeth Goitein, a well-known expert on national security law and surveillance reform confirms the FBI has a database full of unlawful surveillance on American citizens Rep Brandon Gill: “So there’s millions of, potentially more, bits of communication information of American citizens sitting in various government databases that FBI agents have access to without obtaining a warrant? That seems like a pretty egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment, does it not?” Elizabeth Goitein: “To me, that is a violation right there, even if every single query complies with the internal standards and procedures that have been adopted. It’s not probable cause in a warrant, and therefore, it’s a Fourth Amendment problem.” Brandon Gill: “Agreed” This is all being obtained with FISA It concerns Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) This program allows the US government to target non-US persons overseas for electronic surveillance like emails, texts, call without a warrant. The main issue is this sweeps in massive amounts of Americans’ communications Once collected, the data sits in government databases. FBI agents (and others) can then perform “backdoor searches” called US person queries on that data without a warrant, using Americans’ names, emails, phone numbers and more

Elizabeth Goitein, a well-known expert on national security law and surveillance reform confirms the FBI has a database full of unlawful surveillance on American citizens Rep Brandon Gill: “So there’s millions of, potentially more, bits of communication information of American citizens sitting in various government databases that FBI agents have access to without obtaining a warrant? That seems like a pretty egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment, does it not?” Elizabeth Goitein: “To me, that is a violation right there, even if every single query complies with the internal standards and procedures that have been adopted. It’s not probable cause in a warrant, and therefore, it’s a Fourth Amendment problem.” Brandon Gill: “Agreed” This is all being obtained with FISA It concerns Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) This program allows the US government to target non-US persons overseas for electronic surveillance like emails, texts, call without a warrant. The main issue is this sweeps in massive amounts of Americans’ communications Once collected, the data sits in government databases. FBI agents (and others) can then perform “backdoor searches” called US person queries on that data without a warrant, using Americans’ names, emails, phone numbers and more

Wall Street Apes

46,369 次观看 • 2 个月前

I just spoke on the House floor to urge my colleagues to move forward with a vote on an amendment requiring warrants for FISA surveillance of Americans. If the warrant amendment doesn't pass, we must vote no on FISA reauthorization.

I just spoke on the House floor to urge my colleagues to move forward with a vote on an amendment requiring warrants for FISA surveillance of Americans. If the warrant amendment doesn't pass, we must vote no on FISA reauthorization.

Thomas Massie

390,492 次观看 • 2 年前

The sleepy Senate had hoped to send us a FISA extension with no changes that would be passed by UC to an empty House chamber. Today, we forced a vote on the Senate’s “clean” FISA extension that ignored our House bill that included a ban on a CBDC — I voted No. And so, even in our “loss,” the battle is not over, and we are forcing the fight in the right direction. We now have 45 days to continue to work for 1) a permanent ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency, 2) FISA warrant protections, and 3) the 4th Amendment not-for-sale protections (to stop the mass-purchasing of your data by intel agencies). And with the extra time, we should open up the FISA discussion beyond 702 to include reforms to Title 1 (where much of the previous bad actions have occurred).

The sleepy Senate had hoped to send us a FISA extension with no changes that would be passed by UC to an empty House chamber. Today, we forced a vote on the Senate’s “clean” FISA extension that ignored our House bill that included a ban on a CBDC — I voted No. And so, even in our “loss,” the battle is not over, and we are forcing the fight in the right direction. We now have 45 days to continue to work for 1) a permanent ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency, 2) FISA warrant protections, and 3) the 4th Amendment not-for-sale protections (to stop the mass-purchasing of your data by intel agencies). And with the extra time, we should open up the FISA discussion beyond 702 to include reforms to Title 1 (where much of the previous bad actions have occurred).

Rep. Michael Cloud

11,262 次观看 • 4 个月前

.Nikki Haley is *openly* pushing for the government to use private tech companies to censor speech. This is a flagrant violation of the Constitution and straight out of the Democrats’ playbook. Any politician who thinks it’s OK for the government to use the private sector as its censorship bureau shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the White House.

.Nikki Haley is openly pushing for the government to use private tech companies to censor speech. This is a flagrant violation of the Constitution and straight out of the Democrats’ playbook. Any politician who thinks it’s OK for the government to use the private sector as its censorship bureau shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the White House.

Vivek Ramaswamy

1,590,468 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 They’re scanning your face. They’re scanning your license plates. This is the digital ID system in action — and it’s shredding our 4th Amendment. We used to have protections against unreasonable searches. Not anymore. The government has outsourced the spying to private contractors. They record everything — social media, phones, streets — then the feds access it all for “free” because it’s the “public square.” No warrant needed.

🚨 They’re scanning your face. They’re scanning your license plates. This is the digital ID system in action — and it’s shredding our 4th Amendment. We used to have protections against unreasonable searches. Not anymore. The government has outsourced the spying to private contractors. They record everything — social media, phones, streets — then the feds access it all for “free” because it’s the “public square.” No warrant needed.

Tom Renz

20,686 次观看 • 4 个月前

The federal government colluded with private social media companies to censor and silence the speech, thoughts, and opinions of private Americans. This should never happen in a free country where we have the First Amendment.

The federal government colluded with private social media companies to censor and silence the speech, thoughts, and opinions of private Americans. This should never happen in a free country where we have the First Amendment.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

294,693 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨 Public-Private Partnerships: Government’s Backdoor to Your Data The government wants 100% access to your financial data while dodging the Constitution. Here’s the plan: Banks run the “track and trace” system through public-private partnerships. You “agree” to their terms, so constitutional protections (like due process) don’t apply—just like Big Tech censorship. Banks sell your data to the government. Politicians say “freeze this account” or “censor that person,” and it happens. All the surveillance and control of a CBDC… without any Bill of Rights protections. This is the loophole they’re building right now. Wake up.

🚨 Public-Private Partnerships: Government’s Backdoor to Your Data The government wants 100% access to your financial data while dodging the Constitution. Here’s the plan: Banks run the “track and trace” system through public-private partnerships. You “agree” to their terms, so constitutional protections (like due process) don’t apply—just like Big Tech censorship. Banks sell your data to the government. Politicians say “freeze this account” or “censor that person,” and it happens. All the surveillance and control of a CBDC… without any Bill of Rights protections. This is the loophole they’re building right now. Wake up.

Tom Renz

15,045 次观看 • 3 个月前

⭕️ Ahead of the Wednesday vote on whether to reauthorize FISA without any reforms, Drop Site’s Julian Andreone caught up with members of the Congressional Black Caucus to address reporting that, led by Rep. Greg Meeks (D-NY), the group sought to join the Trump administration—in particular, Stephen Miller—in pushing for a swift passage. Progressives and House Freedom Caucus members alike are demanding that amendments be offered and debated on the bill. The current version of the bill still includes a backdoor search loophole, which allows intelligence agencies to monitor Americans’ conversations without a warrant, and a data broker loophole, which allows the government to purchase American citizens’ commercial data. The U.S. government notably used the backdoor search loophole to spy on Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020. Now, just hours before the vote, some CBC members are changing course and backing reforms.

⭕️ Ahead of the Wednesday vote on whether to reauthorize FISA without any reforms, Drop Site’s Julian Andreone caught up with members of the Congressional Black Caucus to address reporting that, led by Rep. Greg Meeks (D-NY), the group sought to join the Trump administration—in particular, Stephen Miller—in pushing for a swift passage. Progressives and House Freedom Caucus members alike are demanding that amendments be offered and debated on the bill. The current version of the bill still includes a backdoor search loophole, which allows intelligence agencies to monitor Americans’ conversations without a warrant, and a data broker loophole, which allows the government to purchase American citizens’ commercial data. The U.S. government notably used the backdoor search loophole to spy on Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020. Now, just hours before the vote, some CBC members are changing course and backing reforms.

Drop Site

24,920 次观看 • 5 个月前

The government has already gone far beyond its limits in surveillance and monitoring. In the name of safety, we’ve surrendered so much of our personal liberty already. The more we comply, the further these unchecked powers are expanded. Giving more power to the government and corporations to decide when you can use your own car pushes things into deeply dystopian territory. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and regardless of who is in power, measures like this should be rejected. I discuss this and more with HealthRanger.

The government has already gone far beyond its limits in surveillance and monitoring. In the name of safety, we’ve surrendered so much of our personal liberty already. The more we comply, the further these unchecked powers are expanded. Giving more power to the government and corporations to decide when you can use your own car pushes things into deeply dystopian territory. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and regardless of who is in power, measures like this should be rejected. I discuss this and more with HealthRanger.

Ben Swann

30,921 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Data (Use and Access) Bill must be stopped. This is not a new piece of legislation, it’s a rebranded version of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. Which the Conservative government failed to push through before the general election. Now, Labour are trying again. This bill paves the way for an all-encompassing digital identity system. Despite assurances that digital IDs will be voluntary. The reality is that once these systems are embedded into everyday life, for banking, government services or even supermarket age verification—opting out becomes impossible. The infrastructure for control is being built, and history shows that when governments and corporations gain more access to personal data, they do not give it back. In March 2023, we reported that digital ID's were being implemented under the Digital Information (No. 2) Bill. Now, it is back under a new name, with even broader implications. This bill is not about convenience, it’s about control. But laws like this only succeed when people stay silent. Public pressure can stop this, just as it has stopped other draconian measures in the past. If you care about privacy, personal freedom and the right to live without constant monitoring, now is the time to act. Contact your MP. Spread the word. Push back before this becomes law. Watch and share this video. This cannot be ignored. For more, search on

The Data (Use and Access) Bill must be stopped. This is not a new piece of legislation, it’s a rebranded version of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. Which the Conservative government failed to push through before the general election. Now, Labour are trying again. This bill paves the way for an all-encompassing digital identity system. Despite assurances that digital IDs will be voluntary. The reality is that once these systems are embedded into everyday life, for banking, government services or even supermarket age verification—opting out becomes impossible. The infrastructure for control is being built, and history shows that when governments and corporations gain more access to personal data, they do not give it back. In March 2023, we reported that digital ID's were being implemented under the Digital Information (No. 2) Bill. Now, it is back under a new name, with even broader implications. This bill is not about convenience, it’s about control. But laws like this only succeed when people stay silent. Public pressure can stop this, just as it has stopped other draconian measures in the past. If you care about privacy, personal freedom and the right to live without constant monitoring, now is the time to act. Contact your MP. Spread the word. Push back before this becomes law. Watch and share this video. This cannot be ignored. For more, search on

UK Column

21,509 次观看 • 1 年前

This Government has now dumped the Kept Animals Bill that would have ended live animal exports, stamped out puppy smuggling, introduced licensing for private ownership of primates & made zoos invest in conservation. Time we now dumped the Government as well

This Government has now dumped the Kept Animals Bill that would have ended live animal exports, stamped out puppy smuggling, introduced licensing for private ownership of primates & made zoos invest in conservation. Time we now dumped the Government as well

dominic dyer

78,650 次观看 • 3 年前

$🚨 THEY FOUND A LEGAL WAY TO SPY ON EVERY AMERICAN — AND THE 4TH AMENDMENT CAN'T STOP IT Most Americans believe the government needs a warrant to monitor them, track them, or collect detailed information about their private lives. But unfortunately, they found a loophole. The government may not be allowed to directly collect certain information on Americans, but private companies collect enormous amounts of it every single day through smartphones, apps, websites, search engines, location services, online purchases, and countless other digital tools most people use without a second thought. That means your location history, browsing habits, purchases, interests, movements, and daily routines are already being recorded, stored, and traded by an entire industry that most Americans have never even heard of. The loophole is that while the government may not be allowed to collect certain information directly without a warrant, it can reportedly purchase data that private companies have already collected. The information may be gathered by private companies. The data may be sold by data brokers. And the government may still end up with access to it. For years, there was one major limitation. There was simply too much data. Even if someone wanted to analyze billions of data points across millions of people, it would have required an impossible number of human analysts. Then AI arrived. Suddenly, information that would have taken years to organize can be processed, searched, categorized, connected, and analyzed in a fraction of the time. People are warning that the combination of artificial intelligence and the data broker loophole could fundamentally change what surveillance looks like in America. For the first time in history, technology may finally exist that can sift through enormous amounts of personal information at a scale that was previously impossible. The question isn't whether the data exists. The question is who has access to it. Because once your location, habits, purchases, interests, relationships, and daily routines can all be analyzed by machines, the line between convenience and surveillance starts getting harder to see. The most alarming part? Most Americans have no idea this conversation is even happening. Do you trust the government with more information about your life than your own family knows?$

🚨 THEY FOUND A LEGAL WAY TO SPY ON EVERY AMERICAN — AND THE 4TH AMENDMENT CAN'T STOP IT Most Americans believe the government needs a warrant to monitor them, track them, or collect detailed information about their private lives. But unfortunately, they found a loophole. The government may not be allowed to directly collect certain information on Americans, but private companies collect enormous amounts of it every single day through smartphones, apps, websites, search engines, location services, online purchases, and countless other digital tools most people use without a second thought. That means your location history, browsing habits, purchases, interests, movements, and daily routines are already being recorded, stored, and traded by an entire industry that most Americans have never even heard of. The loophole is that while the government may not be allowed to collect certain information directly without a warrant, it can reportedly purchase data that private companies have already collected. The information may be gathered by private companies. The data may be sold by data brokers. And the government may still end up with access to it. For years, there was one major limitation. There was simply too much data. Even if someone wanted to analyze billions of data points across millions of people, it would have required an impossible number of human analysts. Then AI arrived. Suddenly, information that would have taken years to organize can be processed, searched, categorized, connected, and analyzed in a fraction of the time. People are warning that the combination of artificial intelligence and the data broker loophole could fundamentally change what surveillance looks like in America. For the first time in history, technology may finally exist that can sift through enormous amounts of personal information at a scale that was previously impossible. The question isn't whether the data exists. The question is who has access to it. Because once your location, habits, purchases, interests, relationships, and daily routines can all be analyzed by machines, the line between convenience and surveillance starts getting harder to see. The most alarming part? Most Americans have no idea this conversation is even happening. Do you trust the government with more information about your life than your own family knows?

HustleBitch

23,930 次观看 • 2 个月前

DHS has launched a secretive campaign to allow warrantless entry into the homes of Americans. Republicans brand themselves as the party of “small government.” But if DHS can kick in your door without a warrant, that isn’t limited government. And if you’re allowing it, you’re not for freedom.

Rep. James Walkinshaw

54,603 次观看 • 6 个月前

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Biden Admin trying to use the “drone” situation to pass a bill giving government wireless surveillance access to our phones “The bill before us would grant law enforcement significant authority to intercept private electronic communications without consent — To grant sweeping surveillance powers” “The bill would allow the government to conduct dragnet surveillance of the phones, innocent Americans traveling through US airports as long as the government claims they're doing it to neutralize a drone. So in order to look at the information that might be coming to a drone, it may be that you capture all the information of everybody surrounding an airport or everybody who lives near an airport. Once you have all that data, what are the assurances that the government isn't looking at your data in addition to the data that may be related to flying a drone?” “This is not just about security. It's about unchecked government overreach. It's about capitalizing on fear and media driven austerity to jam through sweeping legislation that could violate the civil liberties of American people.”

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Biden Admin trying to use the “drone” situation to pass a bill giving government wireless surveillance access to our phones “The bill before us would grant law enforcement significant authority to intercept private electronic communications without consent — To grant sweeping surveillance powers” “The bill would allow the government to conduct dragnet surveillance of the phones, innocent Americans traveling through US airports as long as the government claims they're doing it to neutralize a drone. So in order to look at the information that might be coming to a drone, it may be that you capture all the information of everybody surrounding an airport or everybody who lives near an airport. Once you have all that data, what are the assurances that the government isn't looking at your data in addition to the data that may be related to flying a drone?” “This is not just about security. It's about unchecked government overreach. It's about capitalizing on fear and media driven austerity to jam through sweeping legislation that could violate the civil liberties of American people.”

Wall Street Apes

1,799,512 次观看 • 1 年前