正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Fisher argued that the left made a strategic mistake by embracing a regressive, almost anarcho-primitivist aesthetic to fight capitalism. That argument already appears in his essay Terminator vs. Avatar. I think he was right. The left will lose the political battle unless it breaks with that logic. Its only... show more
28 条评论

Accelerationism is also a strategic mistake because it completely ignores planetary boundaries and turns a blind eye to the ongoing ecological collapse.

It is not a question of whether the left will lose but whether the left understands that they have already lost and that they do not exist.

Ecology is the toxic opium of the accelerationists .. they smoke dat shit and free themselves of healthy organ tyranny ,, but dey forfeit enlightenment and Plato

Marxism is always already accelerationist though

You make a far better case for this person’s position than he does.

Same reason russia, in the 20-teens, ran 19 of the top 20 most followed Christian facebook pages in the US shipping little house on the prairie "what they took from you" propaganda

For me the only viable option is a kind of Libertarian technosocialism with a decentralised ‘Bitcoin like’ protocol at its heart.

L/ACC?

someone needs to make a yaoi webcomic of him and Land /

Can the anti-capitalist left stop thinking about Armageddon for a moment? We have larger issues like the genocide happening in Gaza to face now instead of lusting over the end later. Let's be honest with ourselves, if their methods worked, accelerationism would not be needed.

The left is largely incapable of effecting transformative political change because it is bogged down in its myopic anti-fascism (and anti-racism) instead of focussing on articulating class struggle anew. It’s not just Trotskyists that are responsible for this either.

The only reason people hate cyberpunks less than hippies is that hippies are more common. There are drawbacks to either stance towards technology. The left would be making a mistake by committing to only one or the other.

So to get it clear, you are saying that the left should not be anticapitalist? Because aiming for the undoing of capitalist social relations (creation of different ones) will inherently confine us to an ascetic life? What an odd claim.

Read it again.

You write "Any genuinely anti-capitalist and anti-technological path is ultimately confined to an ascetic or religious way of life."

資本主義の本質を体得することやね。

The Right were always against Capitalism(International Finance now)

The refusal of work is a big part that's missed, but it's also the ability to inspire investment in a Public Good that is a counter to Capitalism's choice...

China e I.A. Marxistas vão reapropriar-se do conceito do planeamento central e alusões a um mundo novo afirmando que no passado não deu certo porque nao tinham capacidade de reunir dados. A I.A. permite essa nova ilusão.

I've always viewed Marxism as accelerationist, which I believe is a compelling reason to classify it as evil.

Communization

It’s sad that techno-capitalism has so captured the imagination that only acceleration into an extractivist fantasy seems the only option. Hyperscaled industrialism only leads to extreme biosphere degradation. There exist other paths.

Is that accounting for CHN saving USA from oil crisis by merely sticking to reserves built by backdoor trade with RUS? Surely RUS has some kind of edge raising its arms like a jedi mind trick, swearing it wasn’t them who shot down hundreds of Dutch civilians flying commercial

@Leninistwarrior @MarxistInfo

Isn’t this just Bataille? I haven’t read him yet btw.

The Left and the Right do not see that 'anti-capitalism' is capitalism-at-work as we are all capitalists but both The Left and The Right are blind to this failing to see that their actions are capitialist and capitalistic just as communism is totally incorporated into capitalism

Well, aren't a lot of accelerationist ideas inherently anarchist? At least from my point of view I see acceleration opening door to chaos which anarchism thrives in.

He wasn't an accelerationist
