Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

💥Flashback-Flash Forward💥 The King does not control RAVEC. It is an independent committee that operates on behalf of the UK government. If the King demanded Harry & Meghan get publicly paid security, would taxpayers agree? Harry lost his appeal & in 2026, RAVEC initiated a fresh risk assessment regarding...

14,646 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von Narratorz
Narratorzvor 4 Monaten

'Me, my wife, or my "father's" grandchildren.' - They weren't his 'father's grandchildren' when he yanked them out of their world. He is a shamelessly manipulative ass.

Profilbild von MissSass1978
MissSass1978vor 4 Monaten

He wants it all - pop in w security anytime they wish. Then pop back to the California sun as they monetize the Royal titles.

Profilbild von Lyla
Lylavor 4 Monaten

Duke Doofus here threw "duty of care" as a dutiful father out the window. HE is ultimately responsible. His grandmother the queen and his father the then prince warned him about losing security, and he left anyway.

Profilbild von Ann Petford 👑
Ann Petford 👑vor 4 Monaten

Diplomatic Immunity is the goal. Desperate for it. The security they have now seems good, nothings happened. They went to Nigeria, Home Office warnings & all, & were fine.

Profilbild von Open the Pod Bay Doors, Hal
Open the Pod Bay Doors, Halvor 4 Monaten

His risk level took a huge nose dive when Invictus lost two major backers. He's not as important as he thinks he is.

Profilbild von MissyLuLu
MissyLuLuvor 4 Monaten

Prince Harry needs to grow up and be a Man like Russell Crowe. 👇The Goat who is recognized and loved worldwide, travels with no security guards and handles himself like a perfect gentleman when speaking to in-person autograph hunters and autographed memorabilia dealers. @paulamatanovich @pdina13

Profilbild von Fan of the Wales Family
Fan of the Wales Familyvor 4 Monaten

As private citizen Harry is not entitled to taxpayer funded security which is only for the King and his heir. All other working royals only get armed security when they are on working trips. H has a generous agreement atm allowingRAVECto assess risk if he gives30 days notice

Profilbild von Iain Coy
Iain Coyvor 4 Monaten

There's no risk to him because he can't even draw a crowd these days. N0body cares - he's irrelevant to the UK.

Profilbild von Mad about birds
Mad about birdsvor 4 Monaten

Thing is Harry, the responsibility lies with you and your wife. You chose to leave the UK, leave your family and then to trash and set out to attempt to destroy your grandmother’s legacy. You’re a nonentity who resides permanently overseas. You abdicated any inherent right to taxpayer or your father’s money. No taxpayer should have to support your entitled, lazy life and bolster your continuous derision and shameless money-making agenda.

Profilbild von Jonno Flanno
Jonno Flannovor 4 Monaten

What will happen if RAVEC and the Home Secretary turn Haznowick down again? Chances are that we will hear more moaning and whining from Haznowick that he has been done the hard way by his father and brother all over again.

Profilbild von RatRoyal
RatRoyalvor 4 Monaten

To my knowledge Harry isn’t even a UK taxpayer himself so why should those who do pay tax in the UK pay for his security?

Profilbild von Laffinmama
Laffinmamavor 4 Monaten

What a sanctimonious tw¥t he is. His security wasn’t removed to try and make him stay...it was removed because it went with the job….he quit the job. If he feels at risk then he should cough up for more private security - he is after all, a private person now. What a clown.

Profilbild von DeirdreM
DeirdreMvor 4 Monaten

This is getting tiresome. Are the British public paying for all these reviews?

Profilbild von Deanna
Deannavor 4 Monaten

The British taxpayer pays for these reviews through the UK government (primarily via the Home Office budget) So that taxpayers are now paying for “another” review

Profilbild von Elena Ramos
Elena Ramosvor 4 Monaten

They are a danger to themselves. How are they supposed to protect them from themselves?

Profilbild von helen lilly
helen lillyvor 4 Monaten

You left the royal family for your wife. You both deserve nothing from them. You wanted privacy and no paparazzi but you both just can't stay out of the spotlight. Anything your brother and sister in law do you and that wife of yours have to try to out do them.

Profilbild von Brigid B Gunning
Brigid B Gunningvor 4 Monaten

You and your children are no longer needed in the Royal Family; you Harry left when you chose that woman over your family

Profilbild von Seren 🌟⚡🇦🇺
Seren 🌟⚡🇦🇺vor 4 Monaten

I sometimes wonder if H is mentally right. Or is he's so entitled he just can't let it go. Or he's that broke and he's desperate to not lose everything. Or is M the driving force... Who spends that much of their inheritance or in this case wastes it. Its bonkers. 🤷🏼‍♀️

Profilbild von lets discuss 🇦🇺
lets discuss 🇦🇺vor 4 Monaten

Unfortunately these days it is hard to trust our governments and because of the Andrew debacle it is also hard to trust the Palace. It would be a delicious irony that the Palace can't help Harry because of Andrew🤣

Profilbild von Roxanne Chester
Roxanne Chestervor 4 Monaten

The average girl under the age of 16 is of greater risk of harm in UK than either Sussex!!

Profilbild von Glenn Osborne
Glenn Osbornevor 4 Monaten

Is he still whining about that even whilst RAVEC is still deciding his matter?.

Profilbild von Ana Emanon
Ana Emanonvor 4 Monaten

Why trigger an assessment? Somebody told RAVEC to do so. This was what Harry was fighting fr during the lawsuit. There hasn’t been an assessment in 5 years. RAVEC insisted that its not necessary since he doesn’t live there and they have a bespoke model for him. What changed??

Profilbild von Deanna
Deannavor 4 Monaten

Interesting question - who told RAVEC to do reassessment when Harry rarely returns and Meghan won’t be coming anytime soon , doubtfully even with security ? If it did happen, there would be a total backlash from the population against the monarchy 🤔 💭

Profilbild von steve wilde
steve wildevor 4 Monaten

Do not trust them one bit! It’s his responsibility to look after his family!

Profilbild von Beth Estes, #DeSantis2028,
Beth Estes, #DeSantis2028,vor 4 Monaten

I loathe this man/child.

Profilbild von loop
loopvor 4 Monaten

He doesn’t need that level of security. Nobody cares about him or his old lady.

Profilbild von MyLife,MyWay
MyLife,MyWayvor 4 Monaten

U walked away numb nuts, why the fuck do u think we should pay for ur families security, get to fuck 🤬🤬🤬🤬

Profilbild von Devora
Devoravor 4 Monaten

He's so smug. What a c*nt.....

Profilbild von American Girl 🇺🇸
American Girl 🇺🇸vor 4 Monaten

Doormats gonna doormat.

Profilbild von @2leaveblog by Carla
@2leaveblog by Carlavor 4 Monaten

He’s insufferable

Profilbild von Label 💙
Label 💙vor 4 Monaten

I want the perks but dont want the work. Fool believing his own lies

Profilbild von OLA 🇳🇬 |🇬🇧 🌍 ²º²²
OLA 🇳🇬 |🇬🇧 🌍 ²º²²vor 4 Monaten

Harry get lost Instead of you to spend most of your time with your children You’re running around looking for attention, crying victim

Profilbild von GeorgiaGirl
GeorgiaGirlvor 4 Monaten

Those are the wife’s words. Guarantee it

Profilbild von Funny Face
Funny Facevor 4 Monaten

Such a miserable person.

Profilbild von Suzi Cream Cheese 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Suzi Cream Cheese 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸vor 4 Monaten

Just wait till your divorce battle🤭

Profilbild von noodles
noodlesvor 4 Monaten

Harry is such a dick

Ähnliche Videos

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle DO NOT NEED taxpayer-funded security in the UK. And let’s clear up another ridiculous claim: Harry has NOT been “denied security,” despite what some people are screaming around like headless chickens. Under the bespoke arrangements put in place after Harry stepped back, requests for protective police security are made on a case-by-case basis, with 28-30 days’ notice, so the authorities can assess the circumstances and threat before deciding what protection, if any, is appropriate. He also has his own privately funded security. What he does NOT have is an automatic entitlement to a taxpayer-funded police protection detail simply because he is Prince Harry. There is a difference between being denied security and being denied the level of taxpayer-funded protection you demand. And for everyone repeating, “But Harry said he’ll pay for it” - that is not how police protection works. Police protection is NOT a private service that a wealthy individual can simply purchase because they are willing to write a cheque. Police resources are limited and are allocated according to threat, risk and public interest. Harry also seems to think being a prince entitles him to the sort of highly visible police protection associated with the King and the heir. It doesn’t. Even other members of the Royal Family do not automatically receive that level of protection simply because they are royal. Harry and Meghan already have private security. What they appear to want is the added status, visibility and resources that come with a police escort. And frankly, if this is supposedly all about an overwhelming security threat, why are their movements constantly being briefed to the media? Why does everyone need to know where they are going and when they are going there? You cannot spend your time telling the world about your movements and then demand that the taxpayer provide an extraordinary level of protection because you are supposedly at extraordinary risk. You don’t get to have the perks of the Crown without the duty to the Crown.

Queen Esther

28,213 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat