Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

💥Flashback-Flash Forward💥 The King does not control RAVEC. It is an independent committee that operates on behalf of the UK government. If the King demanded Harry & Meghan get publicly paid security, would taxpayers agree? Harry lost his appeal & in 2026, RAVEC initiated a fresh risk assessment regarding...

14,646 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

36 Comments

Narratorz's profile picture
Narratorz4 months ago

'Me, my wife, or my "father's" grandchildren.' - They weren't his 'father's grandchildren' when he yanked them out of their world. He is a shamelessly manipulative ass.

MissSass1978's profile picture
MissSass19784 months ago

He wants it all - pop in w security anytime they wish. Then pop back to the California sun as they monetize the Royal titles.

Lyla's profile picture
Lyla4 months ago

Duke Doofus here threw "duty of care" as a dutiful father out the window. HE is ultimately responsible. His grandmother the queen and his father the then prince warned him about losing security, and he left anyway.

Ann Petford 👑's profile picture
Ann Petford 👑4 months ago

Diplomatic Immunity is the goal. Desperate for it. The security they have now seems good, nothings happened. They went to Nigeria, Home Office warnings & all, & were fine.

Open the Pod Bay Doors, Hal's profile picture
Open the Pod Bay Doors, Hal4 months ago

His risk level took a huge nose dive when Invictus lost two major backers. He's not as important as he thinks he is.

MissyLuLu's profile picture
MissyLuLu4 months ago

Prince Harry needs to grow up and be a Man like Russell Crowe. 👇The Goat who is recognized and loved worldwide, travels with no security guards and handles himself like a perfect gentleman when speaking to in-person autograph hunters and autographed memorabilia dealers. @paulamatanovich @pdina13

Fan of the Wales Family's profile picture
Fan of the Wales Family4 months ago

As private citizen Harry is not entitled to taxpayer funded security which is only for the King and his heir. All other working royals only get armed security when they are on working trips. H has a generous agreement atm allowingRAVECto assess risk if he gives30 days notice

Iain Coy's profile picture
Iain Coy4 months ago

There's no risk to him because he can't even draw a crowd these days. N0body cares - he's irrelevant to the UK.

Mad about birds's profile picture
Mad about birds4 months ago

Thing is Harry, the responsibility lies with you and your wife. You chose to leave the UK, leave your family and then to trash and set out to attempt to destroy your grandmother’s legacy. You’re a nonentity who resides permanently overseas. You abdicated any inherent right to taxpayer or your father’s money. No taxpayer should have to support your entitled, lazy life and bolster your continuous derision and shameless money-making agenda.

Jonno Flanno's profile picture
Jonno Flanno4 months ago

What will happen if RAVEC and the Home Secretary turn Haznowick down again? Chances are that we will hear more moaning and whining from Haznowick that he has been done the hard way by his father and brother all over again.

RatRoyal's profile picture
RatRoyal4 months ago

To my knowledge Harry isn’t even a UK taxpayer himself so why should those who do pay tax in the UK pay for his security?

Laffinmama's profile picture
Laffinmama4 months ago

What a sanctimonious tw¥t he is. His security wasn’t removed to try and make him stay...it was removed because it went with the job….he quit the job. If he feels at risk then he should cough up for more private security - he is after all, a private person now. What a clown.

DeirdreM's profile picture
DeirdreM4 months ago

This is getting tiresome. Are the British public paying for all these reviews?

Deanna's profile picture
Deanna4 months ago

The British taxpayer pays for these reviews through the UK government (primarily via the Home Office budget) So that taxpayers are now paying for “another” review

Elena Ramos's profile picture
Elena Ramos4 months ago

They are a danger to themselves. How are they supposed to protect them from themselves?

helen lilly's profile picture
helen lilly4 months ago

You left the royal family for your wife. You both deserve nothing from them. You wanted privacy and no paparazzi but you both just can't stay out of the spotlight. Anything your brother and sister in law do you and that wife of yours have to try to out do them.

Brigid B Gunning's profile picture
Brigid B Gunning4 months ago

You and your children are no longer needed in the Royal Family; you Harry left when you chose that woman over your family

Seren 🌟⚡🇦🇺's profile picture
Seren 🌟⚡🇦🇺4 months ago

I sometimes wonder if H is mentally right. Or is he's so entitled he just can't let it go. Or he's that broke and he's desperate to not lose everything. Or is M the driving force... Who spends that much of their inheritance or in this case wastes it. Its bonkers. 🤷🏼‍♀️

lets discuss 🇦🇺's profile picture
lets discuss 🇦🇺4 months ago

Unfortunately these days it is hard to trust our governments and because of the Andrew debacle it is also hard to trust the Palace. It would be a delicious irony that the Palace can't help Harry because of Andrew🤣

Roxanne Chester's profile picture
Roxanne Chester4 months ago

The average girl under the age of 16 is of greater risk of harm in UK than either Sussex!!

Glenn Osborne's profile picture
Glenn Osborne4 months ago

Is he still whining about that even whilst RAVEC is still deciding his matter?.

Ana Emanon's profile picture
Ana Emanon4 months ago

Why trigger an assessment? Somebody told RAVEC to do so. This was what Harry was fighting fr during the lawsuit. There hasn’t been an assessment in 5 years. RAVEC insisted that its not necessary since he doesn’t live there and they have a bespoke model for him. What changed??

Deanna's profile picture
Deanna4 months ago

Interesting question - who told RAVEC to do reassessment when Harry rarely returns and Meghan won’t be coming anytime soon , doubtfully even with security ? If it did happen, there would be a total backlash from the population against the monarchy 🤔 💭

steve wilde's profile picture
steve wilde4 months ago

Do not trust them one bit! It’s his responsibility to look after his family!

Beth Estes, #DeSantis2028,'s profile picture
Beth Estes, #DeSantis2028,4 months ago

I loathe this man/child.

loop's profile picture
loop4 months ago

He doesn’t need that level of security. Nobody cares about him or his old lady.

MyLife,MyWay's profile picture
MyLife,MyWay4 months ago

U walked away numb nuts, why the fuck do u think we should pay for ur families security, get to fuck 🤬🤬🤬🤬

Devora's profile picture
Devora4 months ago

He's so smug. What a c*nt.....

American Girl 🇺🇸's profile picture
American Girl 🇺🇸4 months ago

Doormats gonna doormat.

@2leaveblog by Carla's profile picture
@2leaveblog by Carla4 months ago

He’s insufferable

Label 💙's profile picture
Label 💙4 months ago

I want the perks but dont want the work. Fool believing his own lies

OLA 🇳🇬 |🇬🇧 🌍 ²º²²'s profile picture
OLA 🇳🇬 |🇬🇧 🌍 ²º²²4 months ago

Harry get lost Instead of you to spend most of your time with your children You’re running around looking for attention, crying victim

GeorgiaGirl's profile picture
GeorgiaGirl4 months ago

Those are the wife’s words. Guarantee it

Funny Face's profile picture
Funny Face4 months ago

Such a miserable person.

Suzi Cream Cheese 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸's profile picture
Suzi Cream Cheese 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸4 months ago

Just wait till your divorce battle🤭

noodles's profile picture
noodles4 months ago

Harry is such a dick

Related Videos

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle DO NOT NEED taxpayer-funded security in the UK. And let’s clear up another ridiculous claim: Harry has NOT been “denied security,” despite what some people are screaming around like headless chickens. Under the bespoke arrangements put in place after Harry stepped back, requests for protective police security are made on a case-by-case basis, with 28-30 days’ notice, so the authorities can assess the circumstances and threat before deciding what protection, if any, is appropriate. He also has his own privately funded security. What he does NOT have is an automatic entitlement to a taxpayer-funded police protection detail simply because he is Prince Harry. There is a difference between being denied security and being denied the level of taxpayer-funded protection you demand. And for everyone repeating, “But Harry said he’ll pay for it” - that is not how police protection works. Police protection is NOT a private service that a wealthy individual can simply purchase because they are willing to write a cheque. Police resources are limited and are allocated according to threat, risk and public interest. Harry also seems to think being a prince entitles him to the sort of highly visible police protection associated with the King and the heir. It doesn’t. Even other members of the Royal Family do not automatically receive that level of protection simply because they are royal. Harry and Meghan already have private security. What they appear to want is the added status, visibility and resources that come with a police escort. And frankly, if this is supposedly all about an overwhelming security threat, why are their movements constantly being briefed to the media? Why does everyone need to know where they are going and when they are going there? You cannot spend your time telling the world about your movements and then demand that the taxpayer provide an extraordinary level of protection because you are supposedly at extraordinary risk. You don’t get to have the perks of the Crown without the duty to the Crown.

Queen Esther

28,213 views • 1 month ago