Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Flemish state television
1,914,496 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
33 Yorum

The interviewer acted as judge and prosecutor, determined to convict you.

"If I killed myself, would you be responsible?" would be an interesting response if you're interviewed again (Great job here too)

This is very good. You’re handling yourself remarkably well.

The way they zoom in on the menorah like it's The Office

At the beginning she introduced you as "the most hated academic". At the end she questioned the fact that you are hated and asked you to prove that you receive hatemails. lol It was a solid interview from your side. You kept it real. Stay safe.

People who say you're responsible are acting like: 1) Arday had no agency (but it was his decision to act fraudulently, call the police on critics and kill himself when exposed) 2) the story starts with you (when in fact it starts with Arday and Cambridge's embrace of racist DEI thinking)

VRT is utter garbage. Same filth that gave a podium to Syrian terrorists to promote their book. Same filth that constantly manipulates footage to get their "news"

It's upsetting and absurd that you are being expected to respond to the suggestion that you precipitated Jason Arday's death. It's an absolute feeding frenzy and people have lost sight of the real issues. Also, at this time, your university should be supporting you against the onslaught of incective and insinuation. And what do they do instead? Truly this is not about truth, it is about displacing blame .

Nathan, I'm so sorry for the way you are being treated by Ghent U. Every time someone claims that a whistleblower like Nathan Cofnas is driving a race hustler like Woke DEI Cambridge Prof Jason Arday to suicide by exposing their BLM race hoaxes, remember what Yale and Cambridge did to me. I almost killed myself an untold number of times. I am still banned from Yale's campus and from teaching at Yale, because I called the non-emergency helpline of the Yale Campus Police for help. Cambridge tried to drive me to suicide by publishing a BLM race hoax book about me by US Law Prof Shawn E Fields. I was deluged with death and rape threats. I'm lucky to be alive. Stay safe and strong, Nathan!

Loved how they zoomed in on the menorah

king

The Flemish Inquisition

Nathan Cofnas uncovered an ongoing fraud which has real victims. Cambridge, Roehampton, Durham and Glasgow are potentially exposed. Anyone taught by Arday has a potential claim for thousands in tuition fees. In other words a breach of s.50 Consumer Rights Act 2015. The remedy under s.56 is a refund of (up to) the entire fee. It's also a breach of Part 4A of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008, covering false claims about qualifications and awards. If universities were themselves deceived, that is no defence.

Please stay safe 🙏

Very well handled.

You survived being interviewed by the most leftist tv news channel in Belgium! I can’t even watch it anymore because of the blatant propaganda.

Why profess your superiority then cry about consequences? And if you’re “genetically superior” why do you look like a nonce?

So someone placed under investigation is a worthless scholar, according to you? So being investigated now means the person is worthless even before the verdict is out? You’re truly despicable and a racist. You continue to show race motivation coming after Arday.

Does Ghent University has an aversion to truth? 🤔

You did well, champ.

DEI communists have apparently never heard of the Streisand effect.

You are indirectly responsible then should not be legally charged for murder however you failed ethically to hold yourself back from scrutinising a man with mental and verbal difficulties. Suspending you for a couple of years would be the best punishment.

If you expose someone who molested kids and they commit suicide as a result, maybe one can argue whether you’re * technically* partly responsible for thier death, but had they not molested kids they wouldn’t have done something someone would have been able to expose, causing them to commit suicide. But the person who exposed them still isn’t at fault because (other than the fact that what they did was just), their actions were within a chain of those actions that didn’t begin with them exposing the criminal — it began with the criminal actually doing the crime so that there was then someone left to expose. Same idea applies to Arday.

"This is about DEI and Cambridge." Agreed. If #Cambridge had on August 8th admitted their mistake and pleaded with Arday publicly to seek help, the odds are nonzero of a different outcome. But Cambridge hung Arday out to dry.

There can be no better proof of your unfitness to have contact with students than your total lack of remorse, including continuing to defame Arday despite your allegations being disproven, for your role in driving Prof Arday to his death whilst portraying yourself as the victim.

Progressive scholars have an inviolable right to academic freedom from scrutiny. This is not available for non-progressive speech. Everyone knows this.

They put the man who documented the fraud in the dock. The rector who signed the suspension opened the academic year with quotations that a machine invented and delivered them as scholarship. Can you spot them? (Answers are in the comments.) One offence is treated as a hanging matter. The other is a footnote. That is the real ranking.

Anyone who has been a serious news reporter can tell you, a public figure who is the subject of a serious report threatening suicide is no deterrent to publishing it. It is a selfish effort to squelch compelling facts. In Jason Arday’s case, there’s no indication he ever did that. Quite the opposite, he fought the allegations, hired lawyers and sicced police on journalists. Any suggestion that either Cofnas or news organizations are responsible for his apparent suicide are absurd. Yet here we have a grownup journalist asking that question. Cofnas unfortunately answers like an academic with the conundrum the question poses. Rather than dismissing it out of hand.

as biased as the interviewer is, this is exactly the style of questioning we should bring back. if you have a competent interviewee they can get straight to the crux of what they believe.

You should hire that woman to tweet for you Nathan, sounds like she has collected all of your best edgy jokes.

This is absurd that you can't critize anyone and the fact that you were correct causing Araday to face up to his own mess he created and that others are responsible for proping him up. Apparently if you want to have free speech you gotta come back to the US.

You’re handling this way better than I would man

Nathan Cofnas’ professional reputation should not be dragged through the mud because a mentally ill person lied and cheated and got caught for it.
Benzer Videolar
Sensitive content
Message from Flemish🤗
Este
16,206 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
