Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

📌FM Nirmala Sitharaman differentiates "FREEBIES vs Welfare" 🗣️ “Whether Centre or State, any Govt announcing welfare schemes must first ask: Is it BUDGETED? Is it SUSTAINABLE for five years? If yes, it should NOT be called a FREEBIE. When 80% of tax revenue goes to committed expenditure, only 20%...

39,504 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

15 Kommentare

Profilbild von Rohit Khandelwal
Rohit Khandelwalvor 15 Tagen

Streight forward answer is there : any thing which BJP throws away from budget for buying votes is not freebie but any thing which other party does it is... it is same like congress is corrupt but BJP is taking professional charges which will not be called corruption. They have changed the meaning of everything as per their comfort. Freebie is freebie , you support it through budget or from anything.. these jumla statment does not change the meaning. Govt sucks blood of tax payers and throwing free for buying vote and then FM justifying it with statement, doesnt change the meaning. For once give it from their party fund then we will see how they justify it.. when u have key to treasury throw anything in drain because it is not your money. These are shamless ppl who will justify selling nation as well. And what @ARanganathan72 was expecting from @nsitharaman that she will accept that it is freebie.. how illogical is this.

Profilbild von Ankit🇮🇳
Ankit🇮🇳vor 15 Tagen

Very primitive argument- Money is a finite resource , there will always be options as to where should Money be spent in the budget, as example either you can buy rafale or you can give to people as welfare. Just because we have money in budget, welfare shouldn't be default.

Profilbild von msadpca vir
msadpca virvor 15 Tagen

if "revenue diversification" means taxing the compliant salaried class more, plugging every tax-saving option, ignoring major GST leakages, and writing off large corporate defaults at deep discounts, then the burden-sharing seems seriously skewed. @nsitharaman

Profilbild von Dilip
Dilipvor 15 Tagen

@nsitharaman shamelessly tells that she will plan for 100% freebies and then it cant be called a freebie. So all of taxpayers money will go to freebies. @ARanganathan72 @narendramodi has officially implemented jiziya tax.

Profilbild von Anandan
Anandanvor 15 Tagen

Even it is sustainable still it is freebies. U can call it sustainable freebies

Profilbild von TrueNative Dharma Party
TrueNative Dharma Partyvor 15 Tagen

All lollipop questions. One deaf asking another - a dumber for answers.

Profilbild von Sudarshan
Sudarshanvor 15 Tagen

@nsitharaman all parties shud be stopped from offering freebies prior to elections, simple. Even if it can be budgeted its a vicious cycle of making people lazy & reliant on govt. instead make them work & offer higher wages. Agree ? @nsitharamanoffc @ARanganathan72

Profilbild von Virtual Beta
Virtual Betavor 15 Tagen

Anything given directly to individual is freebie

Profilbild von msadpca vir
msadpca virvor 15 Tagen

@ARanganathan72 seemed to let @nsitharaman off hook on question of taxing farm income. Her response on MDR was that it doesn't go into the Centre's tax kitty. By that logic, why not tax agri income too & earmark the proceeds for the Agri Ministry or to build new fertilizer plants

Profilbild von Vinvas
Vinvasvor 15 Tagen

Good if freebies fund is taken out of useless Bhimta budget... Bhimta already bohot malai khalia..

Profilbild von S19
S19vor 15 Tagen

Who started it ,

Profilbild von Gopala Krishna
Gopala Krishnavor 15 Tagen

Eliminate corruption many things will get corrected.

Profilbild von msadpca vir
msadpca virvor 15 Tagen

I hope @nsitharaman faced some tough questioning from @ARanganathan72 in this interview. He seemed far more restrained than his usual TV panel persona. Had someone else offered the same explanation, I suspect he would have dismantled that argument completely.

Profilbild von hardik_chaurasiya
hardik_chaurasiyavor 15 Tagen

Instead of bringing useless taxes Please bring INHERITANCE TAX as soon as possible it will open big revenue source for goverment, and it will even not hurt that much to the citizen of india and please use that entire money in constructive production and not in freebies

Profilbild von The Indian Order
The Indian Ordervor 15 Tagen

Telangana

Ähnliche Videos

Morgan Stanley just raised their 2027 AI capex forecast to $1.1 trillion and that number still doesn't include SpaceX or a lot of the other AI companies (Save this). When you factor those in, the real 2027 figure is probably closer to $1.5 trillion and AI lab inference revenue combined is tracking toward $300 billion in 2027. On its surface that ratio sounds alarming, spending $1.5 trillion in capex to generate $300 billion in revenue. But the framing collapses the moment you examine two things the bears consistently ignore, gross margins and the revenue trajectory. Gross margins on inference revenue are running at 60 to 70 percent. That means the $300 billion in inference revenue generates $180 to $210 billion in gross profit and that number compounds rapidly as utilization scales on infrastructure that is already built and paid for. The Capex is not being deployed against today's revenue but rather being deployed against a revenue trajectory that has shown no signs of decelerating. To understand how aggressive that trajectory actually is, consider that Morgan Stanley's $1.1 trillion hyperscaler forecast is nearly double what analysts projected for the same year just twelve months ago And they described the demand as inelastic, meaning it is not slowing down regardless of rising costs, tighter financing conditions or geopolitical risk. The AI industry ended 2025 tracking well over $200 billion in combined inference revenue and the growth rate since then has continued to accelerate rather than flatten. Anthropic alone scaled from negligible revenue to a $30 billion annualized run rate in approximately 18 months while OpenAI is tracking toward $280 billion in annual revenue by 2030 from $13 billion in 2025. There is also a structural reality in the capex number that the bears never account for. Roughly 35 percent of total AI spending goes toward training, building the next model generation which is not revenue-generating in the current period. That means only about 65 percent of the $1.5 trillion in capex is actually deployed against the inference infrastructure that earns revenue today. When you apply the 60 to 70 percent gross margin to the revenue that sits on top of that 65 percent figure, the economics look substantially better than the headline capex to revenue ratio implies. Every CEO who has been closest to this buildout has consistently underestimated it and Jensen Huang projected $1 trillion in AI capex two years ago and was called delusional. Dario Amodei said in early 2026 that AI revenues would reach the low hundreds of billions by 2028 and trillions before 2030 and given where Anthropic's own revenue trajectory is today, he is likely revising those numbers upward. The pattern here is consistent, every time someone models the revenue ceiling, the actual number breaks through it faster than expected. Come join Milk Road Pro for our full breakdown, the real unit economics of the AI inference buildout, how the capex to revenue ratio evolves over the next three years, and our entire AI thesis! Link below!

Milk Road AI

21,141 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Even by an accountant’s standards, it was a poor account of the management of the finances in 2025-26. Revenue receipts were short by Rs 78,086 crore, total expenditure was short by Rs 1,00,503 crore. Revenue expenditure was short by Rs 75,168 crore and capital expenditure was cut by Rs 1,44,376 crore (Centre Rs 25,335 crore and States Rs 1,19,041 crore). Not a word was said to explain this miserable performance. Actually, the Centre’s capital expenditure has fallen from 3.2 per cent of GDP in 2024-25 to 3.1 per cent in 2025-26. In revenue expenditure, the cuts have fallen in heads that concern the common people. Examples: ⦁ Rural Development: Rs 53,067 crore ⦁ Urban Development: Rs 39,573 crore ⦁ Social Welfare: Rs 9,999 crore ⦁ Agriculture: Rs 6,985 crore ⦁ Education: Rs 6,701 crore ⦁ Health: Rs 3,686 crore Funds have been cut in crucial sectors and programmes. Expenditure on the much-vaunted Jal Jeevan Mission was cruelly cut from Rs 67,000 crore to a paltry Rs 17,000 crore. (In 2026-27, it has been boosted to Rs 67,670 crore, but what credibility does the number have?) After the months-long exercise, the revised estimate of the fiscal deficit has adhered to the budget estimate of 4.4 per cent, and the projection for 2026-27 is that the fiscal deficit will fall by a meagre 0.1 per cent of GDP. The revenue deficit will remain at 1.5 per cent. It is certainly not a bold exercise in fiscal prudence and consolidation. The most serious criticism of the Budget speech is that the Finance Minister is not tired of adding to the number of schemes, programmes, missions, institutes, initiatives, funds, committees, hubs, etc. I counted at least 24. I leave it to your imagination how many of these will be forgotten and vanish by next year. : Former Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram

Congress

53,786 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Impact After Term | 03 : Reducing the Revenue Deficit While Expanding Welfare When the DMK Government assumed office in 2021, Tamil Nadu was confronting one of the gravest fiscal crises in its history amid the devastating second wave of COVID-19. The State inherited a revenue deficit of nearly ₹62,000 crore alongside severe economic distress. With the support and guidance of the then Chief Minister Thiru. M.K.Stalin, Dr. Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR), as Minister for Finance & Human Resources Management, pursued structural reforms and welfare expansion despite severe fiscal constraints. The White Paper on State Finances released in August 2021 exposed the scale of fiscal stress and laid the foundation for long-term reforms, including data-centric governance measures aimed at improving beneficiary targeting and reducing leakages. Even during this crisis, the Government implemented welfare measures on an unprecedented scale — ₹4,000 COVID relief assistance and grocery support for 2.1 crore ration cardholders at a total cost of ₹9,370 crore; nearly ₹9,000 crore towards crop, jewel, and SHG loan waivers; over ₹2,200 crore for free bus travel for women; ₹698 crore for Pudhumai Penn; and a ₹3 per litre reduction in petrol tax despite an annual revenue impact of ₹1,160 crore. Despite these large-scale welfare commitments, unprecedented and difficult fiscal reforms helped reduce the inherited annual revenue deficit by roughly half within two years — demonstrating that fiscal discipline and social welfare need not be pursued at the expense of one another. — Admin Team

Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR)

44,640 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS. OpenAI and Anthropic are losing money on every dollar they make. OpenAI generated $20 billion in revenue in 2025 and is projected to lose $14 billion in the same year. Internal forecasts project cumulative losses hitting $44 billion by 2028. The company's own CFO warned executives in April 2026 that OpenAI might struggle to finance upcoming computing deals if revenue growth slows. Anthropic reached $4.3 billion in annualized revenue in April 2026 against $19 billion in total costs. It spends $3 to make $1, and is not expected to stop burning cash until 2027. Now look at what these two companies have committed to spend. OpenAI and Anthropic together have committed $1.05 trillion in cloud spending to Microsoft, Oracle, Google and Amazon, making up 43 to 54% of each provider's entire future revenue backlog. - Microsoft: $627B total backlog. OpenAI and Anthropic account for 49%. - Oracle: $553B total backlog. OpenAI alone accounts for 54%. - Google: $467.6B total backlog. Anthropic accounts for 43%. - Amazon: $464B total backlog. OpenAI and Anthropic account for 51%. The entire cloud industry's future revenue is a bet on two companies losing billions every quarter. Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta and Amazon are collectively expected to spend $725 billion in capex in 2026, almost entirely on AI infrastructure. Combined hyperscaler capex from 2025 to 2027 is projected at $1.15 trillion, more than double what was spent from 2022 to 2024. What is the return on all of this? McKinsey's 2025 State of AI survey found that only a minority of companies reported AI meaningfully increased revenue or reduced costs. Enterprise generative AI spending grew from $1.7 billion in 2023 to $37 billion in 2025 and most CIOs still describe their initiatives as pilots without clear ROI metrics. Microsoft's AI business is running at a $37 billion annual revenue run rate with 123% year over year growth. That sounds impressive until you realize most of the capex funding is justified by expected future AI revenue rather than current AI profit. The internet burned money for years before it became the most profitable industry in history. But right now $1 trillion in committed cloud spend, $725 billion in annual capex, two loss-making customers making up half of every major cloud provider's revenue backlog, and the enterprises writing the checks cannot tell you if any of it is working.

Crypto Rover

58,862 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

When you pay sales tax, your money goes up to Ottawa and Queen’s Park. I’m moving a motion for Toronto to finally receive a share of the HST, to invest in the services you rely on here in your city, every day. Please sign the petition: It’s budget season again in Toronto and the cracks are showing between the City’s revenue and the services that the City is expected to provide. For decades, provincial and federal governments have downloaded responsibilities to the City including roads, shelters, courts, daycare, public health and more. Today, approximately 27% of Toronto’s property tax revenue is spent funding extensions of federal and provincial responsibilities. But even as Toronto is told to take on more, the province prescribes what revenue tools are available to the City, and has restricted them almost exclusively to taxes on property. Toronto is one of Canada’s primary economic engines. The Toronto region generates 20% of the national GDP, 20% of Ontario’s jobs, and attracts more than 28 million annual visitors. This level of economic activity is enabled by the investments our city has made in social and civic infrastructure, including affordable housing, public health, roads and transit. We host people from across the country and around the world at events like Taylor Swift concerts, the World Series, and the FIFA games, which generates tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue for the provincial and federal governments. Meanwhile, the City shoulders the costs of additional policing, emergency services, transit, and crowd management that make these events possible. The math doesn’t work. Without any other source of revenue, municipalities have been forced to hike property taxes, cut vital services and delay critical infrastructure investments just to stay afloat. If Toronto is expected to continue driving national prosperity, it must be granted access to revenue tools that are predictable, reflect our investments, and grow with the economy. No more “new deals”. No more begging for one-time ad hoc program funding. It’s time for Toronto to have a fair share of the HST.

Josh Matlow

23,419 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten