Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

FOIA request confirms it was Jessica Hyde’s report that concluded John O’Keefe’s phone disconnected from Karen Read’s Lexus Bluetooth around 12.30 a.m., using Coldplay’s “Fix You” as the reference point. Hank Brennan mentioned this in a pretrial hearing but never introduced it at trial, likely because it undercuts his...

TheChauffeurX's profile picture

Lara

3,472 subscribers

187,920 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Commonwealth's theory in the #KarenReadTrial is that Karen, while drunk, angry and on the heels of a spat with John O'Keefe, backed up her car at 24mph, struck him around 12:31am-12:32am, and then left him to succumb to his massive head injury and the cold. We know from the forensic data on O'Keefe's phone that he moved for the last time, 36 steps in 20 seconds of movement, between 12:31am - 12:32am. His cell phone remained under his body, with the battery temperature dropping and the cameras obstructed, from 12:32am until he was found just after 6am, in the same spot Karen admits she left him. Karen's phone, on the other hand, connected to John's wifi at 12:36am. Karen states she left John near the flag pole and went straight to his house. Judging by the drive time, all illustrated below, she left John at the flagpole outside of 34 Fairview Road at the exact time that he stopped moving forever. Let that sink in. The drive from 34 Fairview road to John's home on Meadows Ave is 3 minutes, 41 seconds.
4:19

The Commonwealth's theory in the #KarenReadTrial is that Karen, while drunk, angry and on the heels of a spat with John O'Keefe, backed up her car at 24mph, struck him around 12:31am-12:32am, and then left him to succumb to his massive head injury and the cold. We know from the forensic data on O'Keefe's phone that he moved for the last time, 36 steps in 20 seconds of movement, between 12:31am - 12:32am. His cell phone remained under his body, with the battery temperature dropping and the cameras obstructed, from 12:32am until he was found just after 6am, in the same spot Karen admits she left him. Karen's phone, on the other hand, connected to John's wifi at 12:36am. Karen states she left John near the flag pole and went straight to his house. Judging by the drive time, all illustrated below, she left John at the flagpole outside of 34 Fairview Road at the exact time that he stopped moving forever. Let that sink in. The drive from 34 Fairview road to John's home on Meadows Ave is 3 minutes, 41 seconds.

Kate Peter

169,865 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead
0:25

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

101,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:36

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

179,619 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

After listening again to Paul Okeefe. When he did his interview. I have questions. They had no visits from the state police that day. They were not told at the hospital what had caused Johns injuries. Not one person from the Okeefes looked at Karen’s tailight or her car. On the driveway. She comes to the house for about 40 mins. Yet he states, as soon as she left they had figured it out. HOW ? No one in that house saw karen reverse at 24mph and hit John. No one had witnessed karen and John arguing. The bar videos do not show karen drunk. Yet he states quite clearly. “ In a drunken rage she reversed and hit John”. So Paul who whispered that in your ear. There had been no extraction done on Karen’s car that morning to confirm the car had gone into reverse. So riddle me that Paul. Let me guess . Was it the 7 mins phone call from Jen to Peggy. 1.34pm Is that when you knew karen had supposedly gone in reverse. You were dripped fed lies.
0:36

After listening again to Paul Okeefe. When he did his interview. I have questions. They had no visits from the state police that day. They were not told at the hospital what had caused Johns injuries. Not one person from the Okeefes looked at Karen’s tailight or her car. On the driveway. She comes to the house for about 40 mins. Yet he states, as soon as she left they had figured it out. HOW ? No one in that house saw karen reverse at 24mph and hit John. No one had witnessed karen and John arguing. The bar videos do not show karen drunk. Yet he states quite clearly. “ In a drunken rage she reversed and hit John”. So Paul who whispered that in your ear. There had been no extraction done on Karen’s car that morning to confirm the car had gone into reverse. So riddle me that Paul. Let me guess . Was it the 7 mins phone call from Jen to Peggy. 1.34pm Is that when you knew karen had supposedly gone in reverse. You were dripped fed lies.

Suzy

22,573 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

MSP: Deleted the Ring Video: Man Shanon did prove something when he testified. He proved that the ring video of Karen Read arriving home (that they claim was “missing” / deleted by Karen) was at one time, in MSP custody. Shanon explained how Karen’s SUV shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08 AM. This means she pulled into the garage and turned the engine off at this time. This 12:42:08 AM “power off” confirms that Michael Proctor deleted the ring video of Karen arriving home. David Dicicco from the MSP was reviewing the ring video on JOKs phone. He made a note “12:41, I think she arrives him.” We never knew where he got this number from. But now with this 12:42:08 “power off” knowledge, it makes sense. Dicicco watched a video of Karen pulling into the garage at 12:41, which is 1 minute before her car shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08. This means that the Ring video that they now claim is “missing” was in fact in MSP custody and viewed by Dicicco. Explain to me how Karen Read would be able to get access to JOKs phone that was in MSP custody and delete this video, that was already viewed by the MSP?
1:04

MSP: Deleted the Ring Video: Man Shanon did prove something when he testified. He proved that the ring video of Karen Read arriving home (that they claim was “missing” / deleted by Karen) was at one time, in MSP custody. Shanon explained how Karen’s SUV shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08 AM. This means she pulled into the garage and turned the engine off at this time. This 12:42:08 AM “power off” confirms that Michael Proctor deleted the ring video of Karen arriving home. David Dicicco from the MSP was reviewing the ring video on JOKs phone. He made a note “12:41, I think she arrives him.” We never knew where he got this number from. But now with this 12:42:08 “power off” knowledge, it makes sense. Dicicco watched a video of Karen pulling into the garage at 12:41, which is 1 minute before her car shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08. This means that the Ring video that they now claim is “missing” was in fact in MSP custody and viewed by Dicicco. Explain to me how Karen Read would be able to get access to JOKs phone that was in MSP custody and delete this video, that was already viewed by the MSP?

Joe Flipperhead

94,398 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.
0:59

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

Jamz

30,271 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Karen Read's theory about what happened to John O'Keefe has never changed. In her new interview with Rotten Mango, Karen states exactly what she has all along: She dropped John off at 34 Fairview and saw him walk up to the breezeway. She goes home, falls asleep and finds him at 6:03am in the snow on the front lawn of 34 Fairview. She further goes on to say that based on his injuries, and with all of the pathologists (and all doctors, too) from both trials agree, that John's injuries are not the typical for a vehicle impact. Further, they align more with being struck or falling on something at the back of his head. John O'Keefe was not hit by a vehicle... because his body says so.
1:01

Karen Read's theory about what happened to John O'Keefe has never changed. In her new interview with Rotten Mango, Karen states exactly what she has all along: She dropped John off at 34 Fairview and saw him walk up to the breezeway. She goes home, falls asleep and finds him at 6:03am in the snow on the front lawn of 34 Fairview. She further goes on to say that based on his injuries, and with all of the pathologists (and all doctors, too) from both trials agree, that John's injuries are not the typical for a vehicle impact. Further, they align more with being struck or falling on something at the back of his head. John O'Keefe was not hit by a vehicle... because his body says so.

BoozeyBeauty

35,062 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

What's this? John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial witness Jen McCabe DID tell a grand jury that Karen said "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" at the scene where Karen is alleged to have struck John, while drunk-driving, and then left John to die in the snow? This is bad news heading into the end of Alan Jackson's cross on Friday (there is no court today). Jackson spent hours going in circles on Wednesday as to whether McCabe had told a grand jury about Karen's confession to "hitting John" and now the world gets an early preview of prosecutor Hank Brennan's re-direct via the video below (where Brennan will, no doubt, have McCabe confirm she told the Grand Jury those very words as to Karen's confession to hitting John). See video of McCabe testifying, on direct, that Karen said the words "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" on the scene of John's death, leaving jurors stunned - Although McCabe did not recall, when being asked by Jackson, if she gave such testimony to the grand jury, McCabe was able to recall that information on re-direct during testimony in the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial (which I have clipped and included below). Furthermore, Brennan has also announced in open court that, at the conclusion of McCabe's testimony, Brennan will be playing videos of Karen's own remarks for the jury, wherein Karen apparently talks about getting into an argument with John O'Keefe in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22 (the moment Karen is alleged to have backed up her Lexus, with a BAC between 0.13 and 0.29, struck John and then left him to die in a blizzard on a lawn). See video of Brennan confirming in open court that those videos --where Karen talks about an argument with John during his last moments-- will be played for jurors, at the close of McCabe's testimony and after she is off the stand, here - Karen's argument with John, between 12:24am and 12:31am, was apparently about a woman John had dated years earlier ("Bella's mom"). McCabe has already testified, during Read's re-trial, that McCabe mentioned Bella's mom as a way to help Karen and John find their way to a house party in the moments before John was allegedly struck and killed by Karen's car. McCabe further testified that, for some reason, Karen started talking about Bella's mom, and John "cheating on Karen," in the moments before John's body was discovered by Karen, McCabe and Kerry Roberts after 6am on 1/29/22. See McCabe's testimony about Karen being upset about Bella's mom, from earlier this week in the Read re-trial, here - Karen, herself, had been cheating on John in the weeks leading up to this death, and John had expressed to Karen that the relationship had run it's course. Karen, for her part, felt John's adopted, double-orphaned, niece and nephew were putting a strain on the relationship. See text messages, from Karen herself, confirming she tried to cheat on John, in his own home, with John's friend (only for John's friend to shut the affair down when that friend realized Karen was trying to emotionally abuse John by way of that affair) here - That argument about Bella's mom (although not it's content) between Karen and John was also relayed, by Karen, to first responders when Karen was on the way to the hospital after 6am the next morning (Karen's parents had her sectioned due to threats of self-harm, and that is how Karen's blood was taken, thus confirming Karen was drunk at the time she allegedly backed into John and left him to die). See video of a firefighter/EMT confirming Karen made those statements about Karen's last words to John being an argument, in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am on 1/29/22, here - Jurors have already seen video of Karen confessing, to a documentary crew, to being too drunk to drive that morning (Karen's BAC was 2-4 times the legal limit of 0.08) and, shocking, a video of Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy, after Peggy told Karen, on the morning of 1/29/22, that John "looked like he got hit by a car." Watch video of Karen ruthlessly mocking Peggy O'Keefe here - Watch videos, played for jurors, of Karen admitting to being too drunk to drive in the moments before John O'Keefe was allegedly struck by Karen's car here - Jackson's cross, in some ways, was ill-fated before it began. Ian Whiffin, a world-renowned cell phone data expert and software coder from Cellebrite, confirmed for jurors that Jen McCabe's Google searches for "how long to die in cold", done at Karen Read's request while at the scene of John's death, occurred at 6:23am and 6:23am on 1/29/22. Watch video of that confirmation, which devastated Karen and her legal team, here - Wiffin also confirmed that John O'Keefe's phone never moved from the lawn of Fairview Road, based on GPS and temperature data, between 12:32:16am and after 6am on 1/29/22 (when John was found). See that testimony here - In turn, Friday should be a very bad day for Karen Read's defense. I'll be with you early tomorrow morning, as always, to provide special Towel Multi-Cam coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -
2:08

What's this? John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial witness Jen McCabe DID tell a grand jury that Karen said "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" at the scene where Karen is alleged to have struck John, while drunk-driving, and then left John to die in the snow? This is bad news heading into the end of Alan Jackson's cross on Friday (there is no court today). Jackson spent hours going in circles on Wednesday as to whether McCabe had told a grand jury about Karen's confession to "hitting John" and now the world gets an early preview of prosecutor Hank Brennan's re-direct via the video below (where Brennan will, no doubt, have McCabe confirm she told the Grand Jury those very words as to Karen's confession to hitting John). See video of McCabe testifying, on direct, that Karen said the words "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" on the scene of John's death, leaving jurors stunned - Although McCabe did not recall, when being asked by Jackson, if she gave such testimony to the grand jury, McCabe was able to recall that information on re-direct during testimony in the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial (which I have clipped and included below). Furthermore, Brennan has also announced in open court that, at the conclusion of McCabe's testimony, Brennan will be playing videos of Karen's own remarks for the jury, wherein Karen apparently talks about getting into an argument with John O'Keefe in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22 (the moment Karen is alleged to have backed up her Lexus, with a BAC between 0.13 and 0.29, struck John and then left him to die in a blizzard on a lawn). See video of Brennan confirming in open court that those videos --where Karen talks about an argument with John during his last moments-- will be played for jurors, at the close of McCabe's testimony and after she is off the stand, here - Karen's argument with John, between 12:24am and 12:31am, was apparently about a woman John had dated years earlier ("Bella's mom"). McCabe has already testified, during Read's re-trial, that McCabe mentioned Bella's mom as a way to help Karen and John find their way to a house party in the moments before John was allegedly struck and killed by Karen's car. McCabe further testified that, for some reason, Karen started talking about Bella's mom, and John "cheating on Karen," in the moments before John's body was discovered by Karen, McCabe and Kerry Roberts after 6am on 1/29/22. See McCabe's testimony about Karen being upset about Bella's mom, from earlier this week in the Read re-trial, here - Karen, herself, had been cheating on John in the weeks leading up to this death, and John had expressed to Karen that the relationship had run it's course. Karen, for her part, felt John's adopted, double-orphaned, niece and nephew were putting a strain on the relationship. See text messages, from Karen herself, confirming she tried to cheat on John, in his own home, with John's friend (only for John's friend to shut the affair down when that friend realized Karen was trying to emotionally abuse John by way of that affair) here - That argument about Bella's mom (although not it's content) between Karen and John was also relayed, by Karen, to first responders when Karen was on the way to the hospital after 6am the next morning (Karen's parents had her sectioned due to threats of self-harm, and that is how Karen's blood was taken, thus confirming Karen was drunk at the time she allegedly backed into John and left him to die). See video of a firefighter/EMT confirming Karen made those statements about Karen's last words to John being an argument, in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am on 1/29/22, here - Jurors have already seen video of Karen confessing, to a documentary crew, to being too drunk to drive that morning (Karen's BAC was 2-4 times the legal limit of 0.08) and, shocking, a video of Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy, after Peggy told Karen, on the morning of 1/29/22, that John "looked like he got hit by a car." Watch video of Karen ruthlessly mocking Peggy O'Keefe here - Watch videos, played for jurors, of Karen admitting to being too drunk to drive in the moments before John O'Keefe was allegedly struck by Karen's car here - Jackson's cross, in some ways, was ill-fated before it began. Ian Whiffin, a world-renowned cell phone data expert and software coder from Cellebrite, confirmed for jurors that Jen McCabe's Google searches for "how long to die in cold", done at Karen Read's request while at the scene of John's death, occurred at 6:23am and 6:23am on 1/29/22. Watch video of that confirmation, which devastated Karen and her legal team, here - Wiffin also confirmed that John O'Keefe's phone never moved from the lawn of Fairview Road, based on GPS and temperature data, between 12:32:16am and after 6am on 1/29/22 (when John was found). See that testimony here - In turn, Friday should be a very bad day for Karen Read's defense. I'll be with you early tomorrow morning, as always, to provide special Towel Multi-Cam coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -

Grant Smith Ellis

22,211 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

John’s niece was just 14 years old when her uncle “JJ” passed away. She testified that she overheard an argument in early January, during which John told Karen their relationship “had run its course.” She also informed the jurors that her uncle had asked Karen to leave the house, but she refused to go and followed her uncle upstairs to his bedroom. When he refused to let Karen into the room, she began banging loudly on the door. During one of their disputes, John’s niece testified that her uncle left the house for a drive to cool off. She recounted hearing Karen on the phone telling John that his niece and nephew were worried about him. This was a blatant lie, as the teen clarified that she hadn’t even known her uncle had left the house until she overheard Karen’s call, and she wasn’t concerned at all up to that point. One has to wonder if this video clip was the time John’s niece was testifying about or if this is simply another glimpse in time where once again Karen had to end every argument in a way that served her own interests, leaving no room for anyone else’s voice. It’s so hard to watch.
0:55

John’s niece was just 14 years old when her uncle “JJ” passed away. She testified that she overheard an argument in early January, during which John told Karen their relationship “had run its course.” She also informed the jurors that her uncle had asked Karen to leave the house, but she refused to go and followed her uncle upstairs to his bedroom. When he refused to let Karen into the room, she began banging loudly on the door. During one of their disputes, John’s niece testified that her uncle left the house for a drive to cool off. She recounted hearing Karen on the phone telling John that his niece and nephew were worried about him. This was a blatant lie, as the teen clarified that she hadn’t even known her uncle had left the house until she overheard Karen’s call, and she wasn’t concerned at all up to that point. One has to wonder if this video clip was the time John’s niece was testifying about or if this is simply another glimpse in time where once again Karen had to end every argument in a way that served her own interests, leaving no room for anyone else’s voice. It’s so hard to watch.

Zona Eagle

41,435 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten