Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

For a One Way restriction to be enforceable, there must be a visible sign. Example, the No Entry symbol as prescribed by the Nigeria Highway Code. So on this case, the FRSC is wrong and they have no case here and the FRSC officer is not acting professional here....

43,517 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

There's been an unfortunate incident in LA with a Uhaul plowing into a crowd of anti-Khameini protestors This man should never have been able to get near the crowd with a uhaul but some info about the situation seem to be - signage on the truck is anti both the shah and the current ayatollah. is this his actual position or is this camouflage to have gotten into the protest to perpetrate an attack? "no Shah, No regime, No Mullah" Mullah is a religious leader so possibly referring to the current leader and not a king like Pahlavi Timeline appears to be - anti-Khameini protestors try to rip signs off his vehicle and are bashing on the windows and eventually his passenger side window is broken - guy in uhaul then stutterstops forward into the crowd, eventually accelerating further, then stuttering again, then full stopping down the road - there is a man surfing on top of the uhaul in the 3rd video, below I have posted another video showing the man on top of the uhaul trying to take the posters off the side, so he is likely part of the anti-Khameini protestors - uhaul driver is taken into custody by police is this a case of police not having the street sufficiently blocked off and so a guy was able to get a uhaul in here? He should not have been able to drive a uhaul this close to a massive protest crowd There are a lot of people saying this is a terrorist attack, it is possible it could be one but I don't think there's enough information to accurately assert that at this time The chronology of events also shows it is possible that the driver was in fear of his life since protestors were banging on the uhaul, windows, and removing signs+ eventually breaking his window Whatever turns out to be the actual case, it is an unfortunate event and as of right now a seeming silver lining is that no deaths have been reported

Kirsche 🥥 🧁

41,247 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I talked to Ms. Meenakshi Natarajan and several other senior Congress leaders yesterday when I learned of this most remarkable and astonishing rejection of her nomination papers by the Returning Officer. This is, on the face of it, patently and blatantly illegal because no criminal case, in the eyes of the law, exists against Ms. Natarajan. This is because, in a private complaint, which anyone can file against anyone, no criminal case comes into existence unless and until the magistrate or the concerned judge takes cognizance. At the highest, in the present case of Ms. Natarajan, there is a notice by a court to her on a private complaint well before that court has taken cognizance, and indeed, the issue of cognizance is yet to be decided after hearing her by that court. So where is the question of a criminal case which she had to disclose? This is well established by Indian jurisprudence, including a High Court judgment directly on point. It is not possible that the Returning Officer took an independent, objective, fair, and impartial stance; otherwise, there is no way in law her nomination could have been rejected.. I hope and trust that the Election Commission in Delhi, the central body, will exercise its inherent, administrative, and superior powers to reverse this decision or order. Otherwise, it would be a very serious violation of the level playing field principle. It would create a highly skewed system in a democratic election, thereby affecting democracy and the basic structure itself. There is still time, since today is the last day for withdrawal. No one can, and should, in a true democracy, be denied even the right to nominate oneself for the Rajya Sabha in this manner. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.

Congress

48,814 просмотров • 1 месяц назад