Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

For decades, climate models assumed that bare ice, the exposed surface left behind when seasonal snow melts, was impermeable. Every drop of summer melt was thought to run straight into the ocean. But new research shows bare ice can actually absorb, retain, and even refreeze meltwater. Field data show... current models exaggerating Greenland runoff by between 21 to 58% during peak melt, with runoff-driven mass loss overstated by as much as 47%, and surface melt by up to 40%. In southwest Greenland alone, between 11 and 17 gigatons of meltwater are held back each year within bare ice. That's nearly 15% of what models assumed was pouring into the sea. And because more than three quarters of Greenland's melt comes from these bare ice zones, the errors here are huge. Greenland has been the poster child of global warming for decades. But if its melt has been exaggerated by half, the narrative collapses.show more

Electroverse

36,374 subscribers

10,758 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Greenland was ice-free 100,000 years ago, when CO2 was at pre-industrial levels. Scientists have known this for decades. Nuuk, the island's capital, hasn't warmed in a century. Since the 1990s, the island has actually been cooling. Back during the Medieval Warm Period, western Greenland was 2C warmer. In fact, ice cores reveal Greenland is colder today than for most of the past 10,000 years. Melt runoff is far lower than climate models claim, as much as 58% less. And most recently, snowfall during the 2024-25 season came in far above the long-term average. Greenland's ice tells a story of natural cycles, not man-made catastrophe.

Greenland was ice-free 100,000 years ago, when CO2 was at pre-industrial levels. Scientists have known this for decades. Nuuk, the island's capital, hasn't warmed in a century. Since the 1990s, the island has actually been cooling. Back during the Medieval Warm Period, western Greenland was 2C warmer. In fact, ice cores reveal Greenland is colder today than for most of the past 10,000 years. Melt runoff is far lower than climate models claim, as much as 58% less. And most recently, snowfall during the 2024-25 season came in far above the long-term average. Greenland's ice tells a story of natural cycles, not man-made catastrophe.

Electroverse

61,920 views • 4 days ago

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks | Climate Conservative Consumer Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. The findings suggest factors beyond surface temperature, such as ocean currents or ice dynamics, may drive observed ice sheet changes. Ice-free areas showed higher average temperatures than ice-covered regions but neither displayed significant warming, challenging assumptions that ice-free regions would warm faster. The study aligns with other research indicating slowed warming since the 1990s, complicating climate model assumptions. While MODIS data has limitations (e.g., cloud cover), the results highlight complex Arctic climate dynamics, urging reevaluation of ice melt drivers and their implications for sea level projections. The analysis divided Greenland into four primary regions (North, Central-North, Central-South, South), each with nine sub-regions, using statistical methods to isolate long-term trends from seasonal variability. These results underscore the need for honest integration of such findings into climate science discourse, emphasizing the complexity of Arctic climate dynamics and demanding reassessment of current climate models. Read more:

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks | Climate Conservative Consumer Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. The findings suggest factors beyond surface temperature, such as ocean currents or ice dynamics, may drive observed ice sheet changes. Ice-free areas showed higher average temperatures than ice-covered regions but neither displayed significant warming, challenging assumptions that ice-free regions would warm faster. The study aligns with other research indicating slowed warming since the 1990s, complicating climate model assumptions. While MODIS data has limitations (e.g., cloud cover), the results highlight complex Arctic climate dynamics, urging reevaluation of ice melt drivers and their implications for sea level projections. The analysis divided Greenland into four primary regions (North, Central-North, Central-South, South), each with nine sub-regions, using statistical methods to isolate long-term trends from seasonal variability. These results underscore the need for honest integration of such findings into climate science discourse, emphasizing the complexity of Arctic climate dynamics and demanding reassessment of current climate models. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

129,879 views • 1 year ago

At the peak of the last ice age, 20,000 years ago, sea levels were 400 feet lower than today. As the ice sheets melted, oceans surged upward, rising at an average of 15 mm per year between 15,000 and 8,000 years ago. During 'Meltwater Pulse 1A', seas shot up by 50 feet in just 500 years - a foot per decade as ice sheets collapsed. But by 6,000 years ago, the Great Melt was largely complete. Since then, sea levels have been relatively stable. Yet today, we're told to believe that the last few inches are catastrophic and all our fault, not part of the natural cycles that have driven Earth's climate time immemorial. That ignores history, data and basic science. The rate of rise we've seen over the past centuries is not increasing, according to global tidal gauge data. A recent study of 204 tidal gauges worldwide found 95% show no statistical acceleration, and the few that do are explained by local land motion/subsidence - not climate change.

At the peak of the last ice age, 20,000 years ago, sea levels were 400 feet lower than today. As the ice sheets melted, oceans surged upward, rising at an average of 15 mm per year between 15,000 and 8,000 years ago. During 'Meltwater Pulse 1A', seas shot up by 50 feet in just 500 years - a foot per decade as ice sheets collapsed. But by 6,000 years ago, the Great Melt was largely complete. Since then, sea levels have been relatively stable. Yet today, we're told to believe that the last few inches are catastrophic and all our fault, not part of the natural cycles that have driven Earth's climate time immemorial. That ignores history, data and basic science. The rate of rise we've seen over the past centuries is not increasing, according to global tidal gauge data. A recent study of 204 tidal gauges worldwide found 95% show no statistical acceleration, and the few that do are explained by local land motion/subsidence - not climate change.

Electroverse

51,933 views • 4 months ago

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age, 1300 to 1850, glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. And history shows that's when life suffers most.

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age, 1300 to 1850, glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. And history shows that's when life suffers most.

Electroverse

21,860 views • 6 days ago

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850) glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. History shows that's when life suffers most.

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850) glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. History shows that's when life suffers most.

Electroverse

25,299 views • 4 months ago

The 2025 Arctic sea ice minimum stands at 4.6 million km2. That's 350,000 km2 more than 2024, and 180,000 above the 2011 to 2020 average. The claims of an ice-free Arctic have failed, yet again. In fact, no decline in sea ice has been observed in 18 years, longer if you take into account the artificial drop post-2007 which was due to a sensor and an algorithmic change. Mainstream scientists are of course dumbfounded by this pause. One paper (Swart 2015) claimed that an 18-year pause in melting was less than 10% likely. Experts underestimated the resilience of Arctic sea ice, assigning more than a 90% chance against what has actually happened. The ice is not disappearing. The models have been proven wrong.

The 2025 Arctic sea ice minimum stands at 4.6 million km2. That's 350,000 km2 more than 2024, and 180,000 above the 2011 to 2020 average. The claims of an ice-free Arctic have failed, yet again. In fact, no decline in sea ice has been observed in 18 years, longer if you take into account the artificial drop post-2007 which was due to a sensor and an algorithmic change. Mainstream scientists are of course dumbfounded by this pause. One paper (Swart 2015) claimed that an 18-year pause in melting was less than 10% likely. Experts underestimated the resilience of Arctic sea ice, assigning more than a 90% chance against what has actually happened. The ice is not disappearing. The models have been proven wrong.

Electroverse

75,343 views • 16 days ago

Back in 2009, the newly appointed director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Mark Serreze, warned that Arctic sea ice was in a death spiral. He predicted the Arctic could be ice-free by the summer of 2030, likely even earlier. Nearly two decades later, the data tell a very different story. According to the NSIDC's own records, September sea ice has shown no downward trend since 2007 - 18 years of stability. Despite rising CO2 levels and every claimed feedback mechanism, the ice is not budging. It remains right where it was in the mid-2000s. As climate researcher Javier Vinos put it, "Clearly the models on which these predictions are based do not accurately reflect the actual climate." The Arctic death spiral never happened, yet Serreze remains director of the NSIDC. There is zero accountability.

Back in 2009, the newly appointed director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Mark Serreze, warned that Arctic sea ice was in a death spiral. He predicted the Arctic could be ice-free by the summer of 2030, likely even earlier. Nearly two decades later, the data tell a very different story. According to the NSIDC's own records, September sea ice has shown no downward trend since 2007 - 18 years of stability. Despite rising CO2 levels and every claimed feedback mechanism, the ice is not budging. It remains right where it was in the mid-2000s. As climate researcher Javier Vinos put it, "Clearly the models on which these predictions are based do not accurately reflect the actual climate." The Arctic death spiral never happened, yet Serreze remains director of the NSIDC. There is zero accountability.

Electroverse

28,537 views • 5 days ago

At the peak of the last ice age, North America was covered by not one but two separate and massive ice sheets - distinct from the Greenland ice sheet which was an entity unto itself. The Laurentide was the larger of the two - roughly equivalent in size to the ice sheet that currently covers Antarctica. Its center was positioned over Hudson Bay and it extended all the way to the flanks of the Rocky Mountains in western Canada. The second ice sheet - the Cordilleran - stretched from northern Idaho and Washington State all the way up through British Columbia to Alaska, reaching a scale comparable to the modern Greenland ice sheet. The combined weight, volume, and geographic coverage of these two ice sheets is almost impossible to fully visualize from the landscape that exists today. Randall is building toward the question that the existence of these ice sheets inevitably raises - how long were they there, and what happened when they were gone. The answer to that second question is the foundation of everything Randall has been documenting throughout his research into catastrophic floods, sea level rise, isostatic rebound, and the civilizations that existed beneath and beside them before the ice collapsed. RANDALL AT QUEST FOR ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS Get your exclusive ticket in the Randall Carlson dedicated seating section at Quest for Ancient Civilizations in Sedona, May 1-3, 2026:

At the peak of the last ice age, North America was covered by not one but two separate and massive ice sheets - distinct from the Greenland ice sheet which was an entity unto itself. The Laurentide was the larger of the two - roughly equivalent in size to the ice sheet that currently covers Antarctica. Its center was positioned over Hudson Bay and it extended all the way to the flanks of the Rocky Mountains in western Canada. The second ice sheet - the Cordilleran - stretched from northern Idaho and Washington State all the way up through British Columbia to Alaska, reaching a scale comparable to the modern Greenland ice sheet. The combined weight, volume, and geographic coverage of these two ice sheets is almost impossible to fully visualize from the landscape that exists today. Randall is building toward the question that the existence of these ice sheets inevitably raises - how long were they there, and what happened when they were gone. The answer to that second question is the foundation of everything Randall has been documenting throughout his research into catastrophic floods, sea level rise, isostatic rebound, and the civilizations that existed beneath and beside them before the ice collapsed. RANDALL AT QUEST FOR ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS Get your exclusive ticket in the Randall Carlson dedicated seating section at Quest for Ancient Civilizations in Sedona, May 1-3, 2026:

Randall Carlson

18,072 views • 2 months ago

What if the Earth didn’t ease into the Ice Age—but snapped into it in just a few years? New evidence from Greenland ice cores shows that global temperatures may have plunged by 18°F in under 5 years. Entire forests grew in Canada just 40,000 years ago… and then vanished beneath a mile of ice. Civilizations, if they existed, would've been wiped clean by the advancing glaciers. We're only now beginning to grasp how violent Earth's climate swings really are.

What if the Earth didn’t ease into the Ice Age—but snapped into it in just a few years? New evidence from Greenland ice cores shows that global temperatures may have plunged by 18°F in under 5 years. Entire forests grew in Canada just 40,000 years ago… and then vanished beneath a mile of ice. Civilizations, if they existed, would've been wiped clean by the advancing glaciers. We're only now beginning to grasp how violent Earth's climate swings really are.

Randall Carlson

104,774 views • 1 year ago

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top experts saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change, but the climate alarmist script persists.

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top experts saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change, but the climate alarmist script persists.

Electroverse

38,791 views • 3 months ago

🚨WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan completely destroys MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski for the outrageous claim that ICE has “disappeared” people. Into my veins: MIKA: “I'd love some transparency as to why a lot of these people have been disappeared. You say you have data, we would love to see it.” HOMAN: “That is a ridiculous thing to say. ICE is doing the same thing we've done for decades. But because of the last four years, ICE wasn't allowed to enforce a law. ICE was told to sit back and you can't arrest an illegal alien for simply being here illegally.” “ICE agents are enforcing the laws enacted by Congress. They're appropriately enforcing the laws. If you don't like what ICE is doing, then go protest Congress. However, to say we disappeared people, no. We're arresting people that are in the country illegally and they are public safety threat.” “Comments that you just made is one of the reasons why these men and women are under threat every day. Not just the men and women in ICE, but their spouses and their children.”

🚨WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan completely destroys MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski for the outrageous claim that ICE has “disappeared” people. Into my veins: MIKA: “I'd love some transparency as to why a lot of these people have been disappeared. You say you have data, we would love to see it.” HOMAN: “That is a ridiculous thing to say. ICE is doing the same thing we've done for decades. But because of the last four years, ICE wasn't allowed to enforce a law. ICE was told to sit back and you can't arrest an illegal alien for simply being here illegally.” “ICE agents are enforcing the laws enacted by Congress. They're appropriately enforcing the laws. If you don't like what ICE is doing, then go protest Congress. However, to say we disappeared people, no. We're arresting people that are in the country illegally and they are public safety threat.” “Comments that you just made is one of the reasons why these men and women are under threat every day. Not just the men and women in ICE, but their spouses and their children.”

Benny Johnson

104,079 views • 10 months ago

The Guardian says a study shows Greenland is losing 30 million tons of ice per hour. Sounds terrifying until you add scale. If, for argument's sake, we accept the questionable headline rate, that works out to roughly 263 gigatons lost per year. But Greenland holds 2.8 million gigatons, meaning total loss would take over 10,000 years. And the study itself adds important context. Much of its newly counted loss comes from glacier retreat in fjords where ice was already below the sea, so it does not raise sea levels in the way the headline implies. This is how climate fear works: Huge number. No denominator. No time scale. Just blind panic.

The Guardian says a study shows Greenland is losing 30 million tons of ice per hour. Sounds terrifying until you add scale. If, for argument's sake, we accept the questionable headline rate, that works out to roughly 263 gigatons lost per year. But Greenland holds 2.8 million gigatons, meaning total loss would take over 10,000 years. And the study itself adds important context. Much of its newly counted loss comes from glacier retreat in fjords where ice was already below the sea, so it does not raise sea levels in the way the headline implies. This is how climate fear works: Huge number. No denominator. No time scale. Just blind panic.

Electroverse

135,015 views • 21 days ago

"Climate always changes. What would concern me is if climate didn't change. Then we would have a climate catastrophe." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "Climates are cyclical... When we're closer to the Sun, we happen to be a bit warmer, and when we're further away, we happen to be a bit cooler... The Sun puts out variable amounts of energy... And these are the two drivers of climate: the amount of energy that's put out by the Sun, and how close we are to the Sun." "For more than 80% of time, the planet has been warmer and wetter than now. For more than 80% of time, sea levels have been higher than now." "We've had eight major ice ages, and each one of these ice ages started when we had more carbon dioxide in the air than now. So how could carbon dioxide drive warming?" "So as soon as this idea of human-induced climate change appeared, we geologists thought: No, that doesn't fit in with hundreds of years of data. This sounds like a con."

"Climate always changes. What would concern me is if climate didn't change. Then we would have a climate catastrophe." Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "Climates are cyclical... When we're closer to the Sun, we happen to be a bit warmer, and when we're further away, we happen to be a bit cooler... The Sun puts out variable amounts of energy... And these are the two drivers of climate: the amount of energy that's put out by the Sun, and how close we are to the Sun." "For more than 80% of time, the planet has been warmer and wetter than now. For more than 80% of time, sea levels have been higher than now." "We've had eight major ice ages, and each one of these ice ages started when we had more carbon dioxide in the air than now. So how could carbon dioxide drive warming?" "So as soon as this idea of human-induced climate change appeared, we geologists thought: No, that doesn't fit in with hundreds of years of data. This sounds like a con."

Wide Awake Media

191,036 views • 1 year ago

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

243,062 views • 8 days ago

Start with a single cubic mile of ice and convert it instantaneously to water. The flood that produces would be enormous by any human standard. Now multiply that by six million - the estimated volume of glacial ice sitting on the continental landmasses of North America and Eurasia at the peak of the last Ice Age. All of it is gone now. The question Randall Carlson forces is deceptively simple: how fast did it go? If that volume of ice melted gradually over 50,000 or 100,000 years, the resulting sea level rise and meltwater discharge would be spread thinly enough across time to look almost imperceptible in any given century. But if the same six million cubic miles of ice melted over three, four, or five thousand years - as the evidence increasingly suggests - the implications are categorically different. The meltwater pulses, the catastrophic floods, the rapid sea level rises recorded in the geological record all point toward a process that was far faster and far more violent than the gradualist model has ever been comfortable acknowledging. The ice did not gently fade. It collapsed. Join Randall in the field in New York State for his Finger Lakes Tour, Aug 30 - Sep 5, 2026:

Start with a single cubic mile of ice and convert it instantaneously to water. The flood that produces would be enormous by any human standard. Now multiply that by six million - the estimated volume of glacial ice sitting on the continental landmasses of North America and Eurasia at the peak of the last Ice Age. All of it is gone now. The question Randall Carlson forces is deceptively simple: how fast did it go? If that volume of ice melted gradually over 50,000 or 100,000 years, the resulting sea level rise and meltwater discharge would be spread thinly enough across time to look almost imperceptible in any given century. But if the same six million cubic miles of ice melted over three, four, or five thousand years - as the evidence increasingly suggests - the implications are categorically different. The meltwater pulses, the catastrophic floods, the rapid sea level rises recorded in the geological record all point toward a process that was far faster and far more violent than the gradualist model has ever been comfortable acknowledging. The ice did not gently fade. It collapsed. Join Randall in the field in New York State for his Finger Lakes Tour, Aug 30 - Sep 5, 2026:

Randall Carlson

99,091 views • 2 months ago

The energy paradox at the heart of glacial termination is more precise than most people realize - and Randall makes the mathematics explicit. The greatest concentrations of thermal energy available on Earth are the subtropical deserts like the Sahara and the tropical oceans. Scientists calculated how long it would take to melt the entire North American ice mass if it could be moved to the most energy-rich environment on the planet - the tropical ocean. The answer was three times longer than the ice actually took to disappear. That is not a minor discrepancy. The ice melted three times faster than the maximum thermal energy available from any known terrestrial source could account for. The problem was significant enough that a dedicated scientific conference was convened in 1973 to address it - the energy paradox. A follow-up conference in 1975 attempted to resolve what the first had identified. Neither succeeded. Randall states that plainly - the energy paradox has not been resolved. The question of where the thermal energy came from to melt that volume of ice that quickly remains open - and Randall’s research has consistently pointed toward the only two explanations that could plausibly account for it. A cosmic impact. Or the sun. RANDALL AT QUEST FOR ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS Get your exclusive ticket in the Randall Carlson dedicated seating section at Quest for Ancient Civilizations in Sedona, May 1-3, 2026:

The energy paradox at the heart of glacial termination is more precise than most people realize - and Randall makes the mathematics explicit. The greatest concentrations of thermal energy available on Earth are the subtropical deserts like the Sahara and the tropical oceans. Scientists calculated how long it would take to melt the entire North American ice mass if it could be moved to the most energy-rich environment on the planet - the tropical ocean. The answer was three times longer than the ice actually took to disappear. That is not a minor discrepancy. The ice melted three times faster than the maximum thermal energy available from any known terrestrial source could account for. The problem was significant enough that a dedicated scientific conference was convened in 1973 to address it - the energy paradox. A follow-up conference in 1975 attempted to resolve what the first had identified. Neither succeeded. Randall states that plainly - the energy paradox has not been resolved. The question of where the thermal energy came from to melt that volume of ice that quickly remains open - and Randall’s research has consistently pointed toward the only two explanations that could plausibly account for it. A cosmic impact. Or the sun. RANDALL AT QUEST FOR ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS Get your exclusive ticket in the Randall Carlson dedicated seating section at Quest for Ancient Civilizations in Sedona, May 1-3, 2026:

Randall Carlson

12,019 views • 2 months ago

Popular Ice Cream Brand on the Spot Over Quality Concerns Consumers have raised concerns about the quality of Lyons Maid ice cream produced by Razco Limited, with one complainant claiming that the product does not melt even after being left out of the fridge for an extended period. "Good evening Nyakundi. I hope you are doing well. Kindly hide my ID. I need to raise an issue that many consumers might not be aware of. I recently bought Lyons Maid ice cream, taking advantage of their 'buy 2' offer. But something strange happened. After removing it from the fridge, I expected it to melt like normal ice cream. Instead, it stayed solid for hours! This is the second time I have noticed this, and it has left me questioning what exactly we are eating. Is this even real ice cream? What ingredients are they using that prevent it from melting? We need answers because this is a product that is being consumed by families and children. Consumers deserve transparency about what they are buying."

Cyprian, Is Nyakundi

245,844 views • 1 year ago

Al Gore said we had 10 years to save the planet… 19 years ago. Let’s check the scoreboard on his apocalyptic 2006 predictions. 1/ In 2006, Al Gore stood on his iconic ladder and gave a masterclass in climate fearmongering. He claimed Greenland & Antarctica were disintegrating, that "maps of the world will have to be redrawn," and showed graphics of major cities flooding. The media treated it as gospel. 2/ So, what’s happened since his dire warning? Greenland Ice Mass: - Gore’s claim: Imminent breakup and melt, causing catastrophic sea level rise. - The Reality: While Greenland has lost ice, it's a far cry from "maps being redrawn." - From 1992-2023, Greenland contributed ~13.7 mm to sea level rise. That's about half an inch over 31 years. 3/ Sea Level Rise: - Gore’s implication: Feet of sea level rise, drowning Florida, Shanghai, and the Netherlands. - The Reality: The global average sea level has risen at a steady, linear rate of about 3.4 mm per year for decades. No alarming acceleration. Since 2006, it's risen about 2.3 inches total. 4/ Let's be clear: A 2-3 inch rise over 18 years is a concern for long-term planning, but it is not the "redraw the world maps" catastrophe Gore sold to the public. His graphics were science-fiction, not science. 5/ The real tragedy of Gore’s doom-peddling? It created a generation of climate policy based on panic, not pragmatism. It shut down scientific debate and funneled trillions into inefficient solutions based on failed models. When the predictions fail so spectacularly, you have to question the motive. 6/ The climate is complex, and our understanding evolves. But the "settled science" of 2006, used to justify a radical restructuring of the global economy, was wildly, demonstrably wrong. It’s not denial to point out when a prophecy fails. It’s accountability. What's your take?

Al Gore said we had 10 years to save the planet… 19 years ago. Let’s check the scoreboard on his apocalyptic 2006 predictions. 1/ In 2006, Al Gore stood on his iconic ladder and gave a masterclass in climate fearmongering. He claimed Greenland & Antarctica were disintegrating, that "maps of the world will have to be redrawn," and showed graphics of major cities flooding. The media treated it as gospel. 2/ So, what’s happened since his dire warning? Greenland Ice Mass: - Gore’s claim: Imminent breakup and melt, causing catastrophic sea level rise. - The Reality: While Greenland has lost ice, it's a far cry from "maps being redrawn." - From 1992-2023, Greenland contributed ~13.7 mm to sea level rise. That's about half an inch over 31 years. 3/ Sea Level Rise: - Gore’s implication: Feet of sea level rise, drowning Florida, Shanghai, and the Netherlands. - The Reality: The global average sea level has risen at a steady, linear rate of about 3.4 mm per year for decades. No alarming acceleration. Since 2006, it's risen about 2.3 inches total. 4/ Let's be clear: A 2-3 inch rise over 18 years is a concern for long-term planning, but it is not the "redraw the world maps" catastrophe Gore sold to the public. His graphics were science-fiction, not science. 5/ The real tragedy of Gore’s doom-peddling? It created a generation of climate policy based on panic, not pragmatism. It shut down scientific debate and funneled trillions into inefficient solutions based on failed models. When the predictions fail so spectacularly, you have to question the motive. 6/ The climate is complex, and our understanding evolves. But the "settled science" of 2006, used to justify a radical restructuring of the global economy, was wildly, demonstrably wrong. It’s not denial to point out when a prophecy fails. It’s accountability. What's your take?

Camus

26,216 views • 7 months ago

A cruise ship carrying about 200 passengers became trapped in thick Antarctic pack ice this month. The distress call was answered by the only heavy icebreaker the United States still operates - the Polar Star, commissioned in 1976. This half-century-old icebreaker (kept alive by scavenged parts from its decommissioned sister ship) is the backbone of US polar capability. This is what happens when policy is built on Al Gore's absurd climate prophecies instead of reality. Antarctic sea ice extent is currently tracking the long-term average dating back to 1979. In fact, there is more Antarctic sea ice today than 45 years ago. While in the Arctic, sea ice shows no sustained trend for going on two decades now. Taken together, global sea ice extent today is higher than in 2006, the same year An Inconvenient Truth promised imminent polar collapse. It's 2026, and ships are freezing into unusually thick Antarctic ice in peak summer. The prophecy failed.

A cruise ship carrying about 200 passengers became trapped in thick Antarctic pack ice this month. The distress call was answered by the only heavy icebreaker the United States still operates - the Polar Star, commissioned in 1976. This half-century-old icebreaker (kept alive by scavenged parts from its decommissioned sister ship) is the backbone of US polar capability. This is what happens when policy is built on Al Gore's absurd climate prophecies instead of reality. Antarctic sea ice extent is currently tracking the long-term average dating back to 1979. In fact, there is more Antarctic sea ice today than 45 years ago. While in the Arctic, sea ice shows no sustained trend for going on two decades now. Taken together, global sea ice extent today is higher than in 2006, the same year An Inconvenient Truth promised imminent polar collapse. It's 2026, and ships are freezing into unusually thick Antarctic ice in peak summer. The prophecy failed.

Electroverse

17,514 views • 5 months ago

Brendan Kavanaugh: The piano incident has evolved into a diplomatic incident. It was basically caused by the fact that I said No to the CCP. The behavior of the shouty guy shows that he was not used to be told No. He questioned me as if I was in China and was in a camp. He also played the race card, and once you say you are racist, the UK policemans just melt. It is an unholy wedlock between political correctness and authoritarianism, and he weaponized it. CCP, you attempted to take down the video, but we are keeping it up !

Brendan Kavanaugh: The piano incident has evolved into a diplomatic incident. It was basically caused by the fact that I said No to the CCP. The behavior of the shouty guy shows that he was not used to be told No. He questioned me as if I was in China and was in a camp. He also played the race card, and once you say you are racist, the UK policemans just melt. It is an unholy wedlock between political correctness and authoritarianism, and he weaponized it. CCP, you attempted to take down the video, but we are keeping it up !

NFSC Speaks

16,643 views • 2 years ago