正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

For everyone crying on my TL:

130,362 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

Chopper Tofu 💰 的头像
Chopper Tofu 💰3 个月前

It legit onside That touch means nothing when veigo tried clearing it

ludwin 的头像
ludwin3 个月前

Even if he touched it. Veiga made a deliberate play on the ball there is 0 offsides

Invert the narrative 的头像
Invert the narrative3 个月前

Where is the spike in the graph from the ball touching the Portuguese head?

Fred 的头像
Fred3 个月前

Nerd…. if you know anything about the tools that are available it’s easy to manipulate the results….

Rodrigo Belfiore 的头像
Rodrigo Belfiore3 个月前

Tech is wrong. Cameras are out of sync.

Alexis Esquivel 的头像
Alexis Esquivel3 个月前

Where's Veiga touch?

Guto Lage 的头像
Guto Lage3 个月前

Ohhh FIFA paid the money, so it means its 100% trustworthy and certainly ethical and done with the solo objective of making the game fair....... .....HAHAHAHAHA

Kiitán 的头像
Kiitán3 个月前

If truly he touches the ball, there should've been two peaks on the sensor's reading. One for the Croatian attacker, and then the clear contact with the ball by the Portuguese defender. But in this case, it's just the one reading for the contact by the defender

Mike Drop T mic 的头像
Mike Drop T mic3 个月前

Where is the second Spike?! This is the biggest robbery in history

█ REDACTED █ 的头像
█ REDACTED █3 个月前

At the end of the day, people don’t want to see football games decided by millimetres or micro touches, it’s not the spirit of the game plus the so few goals we shouldn’t be ruling great ones out for minor minor minor infractions

LUCKY 的头像
LUCKY3 个月前

This just proves too much technology is not always a good thing. We were robbed of a thrilling extra 30 minutes and what good have been a match for the history books

Danny FCB 的头像
Danny FCB3 个月前

This fool doesn’t understand that the issue is not whether he touched the ball or not. I don’t care. The issue is that there was a deliberate play afterwards by Veiga who bent down to head and clear the ball that resets the sequence of play which makes the Croatian player onside

John Smith 的头像
John Smith3 个月前

So if the sensor is soo good in sensing touches, why did it ignore the last touch from the Portugal defender’s head, since you’re claiming the sensor is so good in taking even tiny touch signals.?

گامبلر 的头像
گامبلر3 个月前

Why is there only one bump in the sensor when the ball is allegedly touched twice? Anything for penaldo vs messi

Mike 的头像
Mike3 个月前

Let’s see the rest of the sensor for the rest of the play. Why not show the whole play????

Miguel 的头像
Miguel3 个月前

Dawg he clearly didint touch it you can see,it dosent matter what the ball says

🇵🇸🇨🇩🇱🇧🇸🇾🇵🇰🇾🇪🇮🇷🇻🇪🇨🇺 的头像
🇵🇸🇨🇩🇱🇧🇸🇾🇵🇰🇾🇪🇮🇷🇻🇪🇨🇺3 个月前

False.

Sly Iyke 的头像
Sly Iyke3 个月前

And the sensor did not react to the second touch haha 😂😂😂.. Crazy

Jeff Tessier 的头像
Jeff Tessier3 个月前

Simple,if u are a ronaldo fan,it’s offside If you not it’s on🤣 but one thing for sure is that portugal will 100% win the wc if they get this kind of help in every game

- 的头像
-3 个月前

so u think this can’t be fabricated? lol

❄️ 的头像
❄️3 个月前

🎥: nainoafc on IG

kun agüero 的头像
kun agüero3 个月前

I mean also you think a sensor would pick up the graze of the head ? And why no spike afterwards when the defender heads it just after timestamps can be skewed seems like the contact layer is shown over the video of the play earlier but hey it’s over

bean 的头像
bean3 个月前

“I trust FIFA when they say there’s this secret lil sensor that tells the truth, look there’s a graph! Science!”

Kreature 的头像
Kreature3 个月前

I would believe it if there was a second touch when it hit the defender but there isn’t. Seems sus to me

David Berry 的头像
David Berry3 个月前

There's plenty to argue - That "sensor touch" doesn't matter at all - what matters is the #13 Portugal defender OBVIOUSLY adjusting and lowering his head onto the ball , just as defenders head away crosses dozens of times in every game - this contact means ON-SIDE. L take

Dane Parsons 的头像
Dane Parsons3 个月前

The blip was not the Croatian player it was from the Portuguese player behind him

Paul 的头像
Paul3 个月前

If you belive this graph please show me the spike during the same time frame of this when the ball touched the last Portugal players head touches it.. you have just one spike in the graph and that’s the last touch from the Portugal player head..

AFCGIDDY 的头像
AFCGIDDY3 个月前

So Veiga's touch doesn't count?

Tim McCoy 的头像
Tim McCoy3 个月前

FIFA needs to show the second contact when #13 from Portugal hits the ball.

tanimator 的头像
tanimator3 个月前

Dude who controls the sensor signals? Learn your soccer history. There has bern multiple match fixing uncovered in years past world cup. You are a twat if you believe everything corrupt FIFA says

Don Dankalee 的头像
Don Dankalee3 个月前

Dude stfu

Richard 的头像
Richard3 个月前

That is the touch of the Portugal player

BS Nation 的头像
BS Nation3 个月前

So why doesn’t it show the line when the ball hits the Portugal player right after 🫢🫢🫢 you know exactly why

Saurabh Das 的头像
Saurabh Das3 个月前

This referees are doing everything possible for Ronaldo to win the world cup but they will say Messi is the FIFA boy , This ball was never an Offside because the ball didn't touch the Croatia player , This is pure daylight robbery.

相关视频