Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

For everyone crying on my TL:

130,362 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

Chopper Tofu 💰's profile picture
Chopper Tofu 💰3 months ago

It legit onside That touch means nothing when veigo tried clearing it

ludwin's profile picture
ludwin3 months ago

Even if he touched it. Veiga made a deliberate play on the ball there is 0 offsides

Invert the narrative's profile picture
Invert the narrative3 months ago

Where is the spike in the graph from the ball touching the Portuguese head?

Fred's profile picture
Fred3 months ago

Nerd…. if you know anything about the tools that are available it’s easy to manipulate the results….

Rodrigo Belfiore's profile picture
Rodrigo Belfiore3 months ago

Tech is wrong. Cameras are out of sync.

Alexis Esquivel's profile picture
Alexis Esquivel3 months ago

Where's Veiga touch?

Guto Lage's profile picture
Guto Lage3 months ago

Ohhh FIFA paid the money, so it means its 100% trustworthy and certainly ethical and done with the solo objective of making the game fair....... .....HAHAHAHAHA

Kiitán's profile picture
Kiitán3 months ago

If truly he touches the ball, there should've been two peaks on the sensor's reading. One for the Croatian attacker, and then the clear contact with the ball by the Portuguese defender. But in this case, it's just the one reading for the contact by the defender

Mike Drop T mic's profile picture
Mike Drop T mic3 months ago

Where is the second Spike?! This is the biggest robbery in history

█ REDACTED █'s profile picture
█ REDACTED █3 months ago

At the end of the day, people don’t want to see football games decided by millimetres or micro touches, it’s not the spirit of the game plus the so few goals we shouldn’t be ruling great ones out for minor minor minor infractions

LUCKY's profile picture
LUCKY3 months ago

This just proves too much technology is not always a good thing. We were robbed of a thrilling extra 30 minutes and what good have been a match for the history books

Danny FCB's profile picture
Danny FCB3 months ago

This fool doesn’t understand that the issue is not whether he touched the ball or not. I don’t care. The issue is that there was a deliberate play afterwards by Veiga who bent down to head and clear the ball that resets the sequence of play which makes the Croatian player onside

John Smith's profile picture
John Smith3 months ago

So if the sensor is soo good in sensing touches, why did it ignore the last touch from the Portugal defender’s head, since you’re claiming the sensor is so good in taking even tiny touch signals.?

گامبلر's profile picture
گامبلر3 months ago

Why is there only one bump in the sensor when the ball is allegedly touched twice? Anything for penaldo vs messi

Mike's profile picture
Mike3 months ago

Let’s see the rest of the sensor for the rest of the play. Why not show the whole play????

Miguel's profile picture
Miguel3 months ago

Dawg he clearly didint touch it you can see,it dosent matter what the ball says

🇵🇸🇨🇩🇱🇧🇸🇾🇵🇰🇾🇪🇮🇷🇻🇪🇨🇺's profile picture
🇵🇸🇨🇩🇱🇧🇸🇾🇵🇰🇾🇪🇮🇷🇻🇪🇨🇺3 months ago

False.

Sly Iyke's profile picture
Sly Iyke3 months ago

And the sensor did not react to the second touch haha 😂😂😂.. Crazy

Jeff Tessier's profile picture
Jeff Tessier3 months ago

Simple,if u are a ronaldo fan,it’s offside If you not it’s on🤣 but one thing for sure is that portugal will 100% win the wc if they get this kind of help in every game

-'s profile picture
-3 months ago

so u think this can’t be fabricated? lol

❄️'s profile picture
❄️3 months ago

🎥: nainoafc on IG

kun agüero's profile picture
kun agüero3 months ago

I mean also you think a sensor would pick up the graze of the head ? And why no spike afterwards when the defender heads it just after timestamps can be skewed seems like the contact layer is shown over the video of the play earlier but hey it’s over

bean's profile picture
bean3 months ago

“I trust FIFA when they say there’s this secret lil sensor that tells the truth, look there’s a graph! Science!”

Kreature's profile picture
Kreature3 months ago

I would believe it if there was a second touch when it hit the defender but there isn’t. Seems sus to me

David Berry's profile picture
David Berry3 months ago

There's plenty to argue - That "sensor touch" doesn't matter at all - what matters is the #13 Portugal defender OBVIOUSLY adjusting and lowering his head onto the ball , just as defenders head away crosses dozens of times in every game - this contact means ON-SIDE. L take

Dane Parsons's profile picture
Dane Parsons3 months ago

The blip was not the Croatian player it was from the Portuguese player behind him

Paul's profile picture
Paul3 months ago

If you belive this graph please show me the spike during the same time frame of this when the ball touched the last Portugal players head touches it.. you have just one spike in the graph and that’s the last touch from the Portugal player head..

AFCGIDDY's profile picture
AFCGIDDY3 months ago

So Veiga's touch doesn't count?

Tim McCoy's profile picture
Tim McCoy3 months ago

FIFA needs to show the second contact when #13 from Portugal hits the ball.

tanimator's profile picture
tanimator3 months ago

Dude who controls the sensor signals? Learn your soccer history. There has bern multiple match fixing uncovered in years past world cup. You are a twat if you believe everything corrupt FIFA says

Don Dankalee's profile picture
Don Dankalee3 months ago

Dude stfu

Richard's profile picture
Richard3 months ago

That is the touch of the Portugal player

BS Nation's profile picture
BS Nation3 months ago

So why doesn’t it show the line when the ball hits the Portugal player right after 🫢🫢🫢 you know exactly why

Saurabh Das's profile picture
Saurabh Das3 months ago

This referees are doing everything possible for Ronaldo to win the world cup but they will say Messi is the FIFA boy , This ball was never an Offside because the ball didn't touch the Croatia player , This is pure daylight robbery.

Related Videos