Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

For years, so called "analysts" have claimed that Iran is building nuclear weapons in Fordo and Marivan. Yesterday, the IAEA closed both files. Where are these analysts now?

Richard Medhurst

551,477 subscribers

17,002 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Russian government has concluded there was no evidence or proof that Iran was building nuclear weapons. "There is information from the IAEA and American intelligence that Iran did not manufacture nuclear weapons and did not have any plans to."

The Russian government has concluded there was no evidence or proof that Iran was building nuclear weapons. "There is information from the IAEA and American intelligence that Iran did not manufacture nuclear weapons and did not have any plans to."

Shadow of Ezra

64,029 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Iran has NO nuclear weapons. Israel has hundreds. U.S. intelligence agencies, the IAEA, and even Israeli defense analysts have all admitted there’s no evidence of an active nuclear weapons program. So why the endless fear campaign? It’s to justify endless sanctions, military build-up, and regional dominance while distracting you from the real nuclear-armed apartheid state right next door.

Iran has NO nuclear weapons. Israel has hundreds. U.S. intelligence agencies, the IAEA, and even Israeli defense analysts have all admitted there’s no evidence of an active nuclear weapons program. So why the endless fear campaign? It’s to justify endless sanctions, military build-up, and regional dominance while distracting you from the real nuclear-armed apartheid state right next door.

YourFavoriteGuy

15,625 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

❗️ NO evidence Iran was developing nuclear weapons — Russian FM Sergey Lavrov 'There is information from the IAEA and American intelligence that Iran did not manufacture nuclear weapons and did not have any plans to'

❗️ NO evidence Iran was developing nuclear weapons — Russian FM Sergey Lavrov 'There is information from the IAEA and American intelligence that Iran did not manufacture nuclear weapons and did not have any plans to'

RT

209,569 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🎥 Will Iran Abandon Nuclear Restraint? For decades, Iran has refrained from developing nuclear weapons—not because it lacked the technical capacity, but because of a deliberate political and religious decision. A fatwa from the Supreme Leader declared nuclear arms forbidden under Islam. But after the U.S. and Israel bombed three Iranian nuclear sites this weekend—sites under regular IAEA inspection—that restraint is now under serious strain. “There are people in Iran asking that question right now,” Dr. Foad Izadi told Drop Site’. The question: What’s the point of cooperation? Izadi noted that two nuclear-armed states just launched an unprovoked attack on a non-nuclear country, without credible evidence of a weapons program. He pointed to the U.S. intelligence community’s own March report, which states: ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. ➤ Iranian leaders have not made a decision to pursue one. Even IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, Izadi said, has consistently affirmed: “We have never found a nuclear weapons program in Iran.” Yet, Iran was bombed anyway. Izadi explained that the IAEA report cited by Western governments referenced materials from 20 to 30 years ago—files Iran believed were closed under the 2015 nuclear deal. Tehran now suspects Mossad may have planted radioactive traces to fabricate suspicion and justify military strikes. “There’s a lot of confusion and disinformation,” he said. But for many Iranians, the conclusion is simple: Iran upheld its obligations—and was attacked regardless. That, Izadi points out, is forcing a national reckoning with the logic of nuclear restraint. (Apologies for the poor audio quality. We’ll share a subtitled version of the clip below) jeremy scahill | فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi

🎥 Will Iran Abandon Nuclear Restraint? For decades, Iran has refrained from developing nuclear weapons—not because it lacked the technical capacity, but because of a deliberate political and religious decision. A fatwa from the Supreme Leader declared nuclear arms forbidden under Islam. But after the U.S. and Israel bombed three Iranian nuclear sites this weekend—sites under regular IAEA inspection—that restraint is now under serious strain. “There are people in Iran asking that question right now,” Dr. Foad Izadi told Drop Site’. The question: What’s the point of cooperation? Izadi noted that two nuclear-armed states just launched an unprovoked attack on a non-nuclear country, without credible evidence of a weapons program. He pointed to the U.S. intelligence community’s own March report, which states: ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. ➤ Iranian leaders have not made a decision to pursue one. Even IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, Izadi said, has consistently affirmed: “We have never found a nuclear weapons program in Iran.” Yet, Iran was bombed anyway. Izadi explained that the IAEA report cited by Western governments referenced materials from 20 to 30 years ago—files Iran believed were closed under the 2015 nuclear deal. Tehran now suspects Mossad may have planted radioactive traces to fabricate suspicion and justify military strikes. “There’s a lot of confusion and disinformation,” he said. But for many Iranians, the conclusion is simple: Iran upheld its obligations—and was attacked regardless. That, Izadi points out, is forcing a national reckoning with the logic of nuclear restraint. (Apologies for the poor audio quality. We’ll share a subtitled version of the clip below) jeremy scahill | فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi

Drop Site

25,482 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“This isn’t retaliation for what they did years ago in Iraq or Afghanistan. This is about what Israel wants. This is about nuclear weapons that probably don’t even exist. Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of Congress that there is no evidence that Iran is building any sort of nuclear weapon. The director of the IAEA also said there is absolutely no evidence that Iran possesses or is in the process of possessing a nuclear weapon.” Michael T. Lester

“This isn’t retaliation for what they did years ago in Iraq or Afghanistan. This is about what Israel wants. This is about nuclear weapons that probably don’t even exist. Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of Congress that there is no evidence that Iran is building any sort of nuclear weapon. The director of the IAEA also said there is absolutely no evidence that Iran possesses or is in the process of possessing a nuclear weapon.” Michael T. Lester

Shawn Ryan

147,005 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

How is it Trump's nominee for the IAEA, a key nuclear inspection agency, didn't know that both the IAEA AND Trump's 1st Admin certified that Iran was in compliance with the JCPOA? The JCPOA was preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Trump ripped it up & started a war.

How is it Trump's nominee for the IAEA, a key nuclear inspection agency, didn't know that both the IAEA AND Trump's 1st Admin certified that Iran was in compliance with the JCPOA? The JCPOA was preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Trump ripped it up & started a war.

Senator Chris Van Hollen

44,426 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Brazilian President Lula on Iran: We cannot accept a war provoked by the United States based on the claim that Iran wanted to build nuclear weapons. I can say that this is a lie, because I was in Iran in 2010. I was there with President Ahmadinejad, together with the President of Türkiye, signing an agreement that Iran would not produce nuclear weapons—it would enrich uranium only for peaceful, scientific purposes, just as Brazil does. In the same way, they claimed Saddam had chemical weapons, and they went and destroyed Iraq. Where are those chemical weapons? More than twenty years later—where are they?

Brazilian President Lula on Iran: We cannot accept a war provoked by the United States based on the claim that Iran wanted to build nuclear weapons. I can say that this is a lie, because I was in Iran in 2010. I was there with President Ahmadinejad, together with the President of Türkiye, signing an agreement that Iran would not produce nuclear weapons—it would enrich uranium only for peaceful, scientific purposes, just as Brazil does. In the same way, they claimed Saddam had chemical weapons, and they went and destroyed Iraq. Where are those chemical weapons? More than twenty years later—where are they?

Clash Report

59,998 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 URGENT — Nuclear Concerns: Sources report that several military analysts believe Iran could already have a nuclear weapon or be on the verge of developing one. ⚠️ Independent confirmation is still unclear.

🚨 URGENT — Nuclear Concerns: Sources report that several military analysts believe Iran could already have a nuclear weapon or be on the verge of developing one. ⚠️ Independent confirmation is still unclear.

News Now

447,078 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marandi: State and government officials have always been saying that we do not need nuclear weapons, and they were always explaining why we do not need nuclear weapons—yet now, according to the polls that I saw, a very strong majority believe that Iran should have nuclear weapons. Trump single-handedly has convinced many Iranians that Iran should develop a nuclear weapon, despite the fact that the government, the leader, and political parties, for the most part, are still saying we shouldn’t pursue nuclear weapons, at least for now.

Marandi: State and government officials have always been saying that we do not need nuclear weapons, and they were always explaining why we do not need nuclear weapons—yet now, according to the polls that I saw, a very strong majority believe that Iran should have nuclear weapons. Trump single-handedly has convinced many Iranians that Iran should develop a nuclear weapon, despite the fact that the government, the leader, and political parties, for the most part, are still saying we shouldn’t pursue nuclear weapons, at least for now.

Acyn

31,717 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

“Yesterday was a very, very good day. We made a lot of good progress,” says Vice President JD Vance on the four big accomplishments negotiated yesterday in Switzerland. “The Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a major milestone for the American people and the first step in permanently ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran.”

“Yesterday was a very, very good day. We made a lot of good progress,” says Vice President JD Vance on the four big accomplishments negotiated yesterday in Switzerland. “The Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a major milestone for the American people and the first step in permanently ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran.”

Rapid Response 47

471,842 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In my opinion, the USA and Israel are using tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. Those below 0.5 kilotons cannot be easily detected or confirmed by the CTBTO, so they are probably using tactical nuclear weapons below 0.5 kilotons. This footage is from the previous night! For the sake of clarity and to avoid labeling this post, the mainstream narrative is that these are not tactical nuclear weapons but strikes on underground weapons facilities in Isfahan, which coincidentally is Iran’s military and nuclear heartland.

In my opinion, the USA and Israel are using tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. Those below 0.5 kilotons cannot be easily detected or confirmed by the CTBTO, so they are probably using tactical nuclear weapons below 0.5 kilotons. This footage is from the previous night! For the sake of clarity and to avoid labeling this post, the mainstream narrative is that these are not tactical nuclear weapons but strikes on underground weapons facilities in Isfahan, which coincidentally is Iran’s military and nuclear heartland.

Open Minded Approach

867,281 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

President Trump suggested Tuesday that “regime change” has effectively already happened in Iran because several top leaders have been killed and replaced during the war. But many Iran analysts reject that idea, Holly Williams reports, noting the country remains an Islamic republic and that its new supreme leader is widely seen as potentially even more hardline than his father. Trump also claimed Iran is eager for a deal and has agreed it will never pursue a nuclear weapon. So far, Iranian officials have only confirmed to CBS News that they have received U.S. proposals through mediators and are reviewing them.

President Trump suggested Tuesday that “regime change” has effectively already happened in Iran because several top leaders have been killed and replaced during the war. But many Iran analysts reject that idea, Holly Williams reports, noting the country remains an Islamic republic and that its new supreme leader is widely seen as potentially even more hardline than his father. Trump also claimed Iran is eager for a deal and has agreed it will never pursue a nuclear weapon. So far, Iranian officials have only confirmed to CBS News that they have received U.S. proposals through mediators and are reviewing them.

CBS News

17,069 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Epstein files and the war in Iran have DESTROYED Trump's presidency. "What do these two things have in common? Israel is responsible for both them."

The Epstein files and the war in Iran have DESTROYED Trump's presidency. "What do these two things have in common? Israel is responsible for both them."

Fuentes Updates

33,519 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Tucker Carlson is now making the same point that his favourite "political scientist" John Mearsheimer has made. That Iran SHOULD have a nuclear weapon. Mearsheimer: “There’s no question that a nuclear-armed Iran would bring stability to the region. Because nuclear weapons are weapons of peace; they’re weapons of deterrence. They have hardly any offensive capability at all.”

Tucker Carlson is now making the same point that his favourite "political scientist" John Mearsheimer has made. That Iran SHOULD have a nuclear weapon. Mearsheimer: “There’s no question that a nuclear-armed Iran would bring stability to the region. Because nuclear weapons are weapons of peace; they’re weapons of deterrence. They have hardly any offensive capability at all.”

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

45,352 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Comer: "What's going on in Iran has to do with nuclear capabilities and the US not wanting Iran to have a nuclear weapon. These scientists that have either died or are missing now, these were the leaders in research and helping to ensure we stay the leader in nuclear technology, so that's why it's a concern."

Comer: "What's going on in Iran has to do with nuclear capabilities and the US not wanting Iran to have a nuclear weapon. These scientists that have either died or are missing now, these were the leaders in research and helping to ensure we stay the leader in nuclear technology, so that's why it's a concern."

Aaron Rupar

96,104 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Trump is just called out for being a "chicken," and he has trouble coping, so he cries harder. “Wall Street analysts have coined a new term called the ‘Taco trade’. They are saying ‘Trump always chickens out.’ What’s your response to that?”

Trump is just called out for being a "chicken," and he has trouble coping, so he cries harder. “Wall Street analysts have coined a new term called the ‘Taco trade’. They are saying ‘Trump always chickens out.’ What’s your response to that?”

Ed Krassenstein

316,093 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr