Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Forge Your Future -Join as an Officer Applications open for SSC NCC Special Entry –123rd Course for Men & Women Eligibility- •Unmarried Male & Female •Education: Graduate + NCC ‘C’ Cert (min ‘B’ grade) •Age: 19–25 years Last Date:- Men : 10 Sept. 2025 Women : 11 Sept. 2025

DIRECTORATERTG's profile picture

Directorate General of Recruiting - Indian Army

82,831 subscribers

10,655,272 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

SSC (Tech)-66 Entry Applications are now Open for Men & Women! Who can apply? * Engineering graduates * Age: 20 to 27 years * Unmarried male & female candidates Last Dates to Apply: * SSCW (Tech)-66 Women: 21st August 2025 * SSC (Tech) -66 Men: 22nd August 2025
0:54

SSC (Tech)-66 Entry Applications are now Open for Men & Women! Who can apply? * Engineering graduates * Age: 20 to 27 years * Unmarried male & female candidates Last Dates to Apply: * SSCW (Tech)-66 Women: 21st August 2025 * SSC (Tech) -66 Men: 22nd August 2025

Directorate General of Recruiting - Indian Army

15,675,547 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Join Indian Army as an Engineer | SSC (Tech)–67 Entry Who Can Apply? * Unmarried Male & Female Candidates * Age: 20 – 27 years (as on 01 October 2026) * Engineering Graduates (Final Year Students Eligible) Last Date to Apply: * Women – 04 Feb 2026 * Men – 05 Feb 2026
0:44

Join Indian Army as an Engineer | SSC (Tech)–67 Entry Who Can Apply? * Unmarried Male & Female Candidates * Age: 20 – 27 years (as on 01 October 2026) * Engineering Graduates (Final Year Students Eligible) Last Date to Apply: * Women – 04 Feb 2026 * Men – 05 Feb 2026

Directorate General of Recruiting - Indian Army

20,283,779 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

SSC (Tech)-68 applications are now open for Men & Women! Who can apply? • Engineering graduates (Final-year students can also apply) • Age: 20–27 years • Unmarried male and female candidates Last dates to apply: • SSCW (Tech)-68 (Women): 06 August 2026 • SSC (Tech)-68 (Men): 07 August 2026 Apply now: #JoinIndianArmy #IndianArmy
0:41

SSC (Tech)-68 applications are now open for Men & Women! Who can apply? • Engineering graduates (Final-year students can also apply) • Age: 20–27 years • Unmarried male and female candidates Last dates to apply: • SSCW (Tech)-68 (Women): 06 August 2026 • SSC (Tech)-68 (Men): 07 August 2026 Apply now: #JoinIndianArmy #IndianArmy

Directorate General of Recruiting - Indian Army

17,201 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

#JoinIndianNavy As Short Service Commission Officers. Course commencing Jun 2024 at Indian Naval Academy. Registration Open. Unmarried men & unmarried women candidates apply Online. Last date for submission #29Oct 23 Details ⬇️ & EMPLOYMENT NEWS of #21Oct 23
1:00

#JoinIndianNavy As Short Service Commission Officers. Course commencing Jun 2024 at Indian Naval Academy. Registration Open. Unmarried men & unmarried women candidates apply Online. Last date for submission #29Oct 23 Details ⬇️ & EMPLOYMENT NEWS of #21Oct 23

SpokespersonNavy

28,667 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The Joy of RAGE! Twitter/X Livestream Philosopher Stefan Molyneux digs into the joy of rage and shows how useful anger can protect you from the dead who still live in your mind. He also looks at what used to restrain women versus what happens now, and takes calls on family wounds and dating. 0:00:00 Sunday Morning Philosophy Begins 0:02:39 What Restrains Women? 0:04:19 Lindsay Clancy and Female Sympathy 0:08:00 What Constrains Men? 0:12:11 The Old Limits on Women 0:17:14 State Power and Female Freedom 0:21:34 Consequences and Moral Discipline 0:25:13 Rewarding Irresponsibility 0:30:05 Sympathy as Incentive 0:33:46 Brain Differences and Leadership 0:36:19 Female Consensus and Men 0:38:56 Negotiating Household Authority 0:44:15 Women and the Left 0:47:48 Family Healing Update 0:50:48 Confronting a Dead Father 1:02:18 Anger as Protection 1:16:15 Manipulation and Integrity 1:19:58 Passive Aggression Problems 1:24:41 Dating After Recovery JOIN ME IN NASHVILLE SEPTEMBER 12! Use code STEFAN for 10% off! GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!
1:28:07

The Joy of RAGE! Twitter/X Livestream Philosopher Stefan Molyneux digs into the joy of rage and shows how useful anger can protect you from the dead who still live in your mind. He also looks at what used to restrain women versus what happens now, and takes calls on family wounds and dating. 0:00:00 Sunday Morning Philosophy Begins 0:02:39 What Restrains Women? 0:04:19 Lindsay Clancy and Female Sympathy 0:08:00 What Constrains Men? 0:12:11 The Old Limits on Women 0:17:14 State Power and Female Freedom 0:21:34 Consequences and Moral Discipline 0:25:13 Rewarding Irresponsibility 0:30:05 Sympathy as Incentive 0:33:46 Brain Differences and Leadership 0:36:19 Female Consensus and Men 0:38:56 Negotiating Household Authority 0:44:15 Women and the Left 0:47:48 Family Healing Update 0:50:48 Confronting a Dead Father 1:02:18 Anger as Protection 1:16:15 Manipulation and Integrity 1:19:58 Passive Aggression Problems 1:24:41 Dating After Recovery JOIN ME IN NASHVILLE SEPTEMBER 12! Use code STEFAN for 10% off! GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA

12,413 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🚨BREAKING: Alibi Anomalies in the Charlie Kirk Investigation? This CitiBank Receipt Raises SERIOUS Red Flags! 🔍🤯 Folks, let's talk facts: In a standard CitiBank mobile app or online receipt, the button for disputing a charge is ALWAYS "Dispute Charge" – both words capitalized. But in the screenshot provided as part of Cabot Phillips' alibi? It's "Dispute charge" with a lowercase 'c'. This is NOT standard. Multiple verified screenshots and app guides confirm the consistent capitalization. This irregularity could indicate an abnormality, such as a potential digital alteration or Photoshop edit – or perhaps an outdated app version/glitch. Either way, it's highly unusual and not what we'd expect from an authentic, current Citi receipt. Why does this matter? It ties directly into the timeline around Charlie Kirk's tragic death. Witness Mitch Snow's testimony places key figures – including Erika Kirk and Brian Harpool – at Fort Huachuca on Sept. 8, 2025, specifically at the Candlewood Suites hotel, followed by a suspicious high-level meeting on the morning of Sept. 9 where the witness places Cabot Philips in attendance. Cabot Phillips (Erika's ex) shared this receipt and a Publix photo as an alibi to show he was in Nashville buying balloons on Sept. 8, far from Arizona. If the alibi holds, great – but these inconsistencies cast doubt. And it's not just the receipt. The Publix photo has its own red flags: The magazine rack behind him shows out-of-date issues that don't align with a Sept. 8 snapshot. People Magazine: The visible issue is the Sept. 1, 2025, edition featuring Helen Mirren. But grocery stores like Publix update racks weekly – religiously, often stocking the next issue in advance. By Sept. 8, the Sept. 8 (or later) issue should have been out, meaning this older Sept. 1 copy is unusually outdated for that date. Time Magazine's Special Edition 50th Anniversary Jaws: This collector's issue was released on July 11, 2025 (tied to the documentary premiere), but investigations revealed it wasn't widely available in stores until after Aug. 29 (theater re-release date). Yet it's prominently displayed – another timing mismatch that suggests the photo might not be from Sept. 8 as claimed. Adding to the questions: Another photo shared by Cabot Phillips – a family snapshot with a balloon, purportedly taken in Nashville on Sept. 8 at 6:57 PM – shows signs of digital manipulation based on Error Level Analysis (ELA) from tools like FotoForensics. According to analysis by SCFactsOnly✝️🇬🇪, the ELA output reveals heavy pixelation, noise, and compression artifacts, especially in the semi-transparent date/location overlay ("Nashville September 8 6:57 PM"). This overlay stands out dramatically in ELA because text layers added digitally compress differently from the original photo content, making it a classic red flag for editing. The rest of the image shows more uniform compression, but varying noise patches suggest possible other adjustments. While there could be benign reasons (like app filters), this anomaly indicates the photo may have been altered – particularly the timestamp and location stamp – which could undermine its reliability as evidence of being in Nashville on that date. I'm not accusing anyone of faking anything – there could be innocent explanations, like a store with delayed stock, app variations, or photo editing for non-nefarious reasons. But based on the totality of circumstances – the non-standard capitalization on the receipt, the magazine date discrepancies, and now this ELA-detected irregularity in the family photo – these are irregular, highly unusual abnormalities that simply don't add up without more context. This warrants further investigation to get to the truth. Charlie's legacy deserves nothing less. If you're following the open-source probe, share this and demand answers. What do YOU think? 👇 Shoutout to Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸, SCFactsOnly✝️🇬🇪 and who has been steadfast in pointing out these inconsistencies and continuing the investigation on this matter. I would suggest everyone FOLLOW these guys. RT, Tag Candace Owens abd let me know your thoughts below.
1:19

🚨BREAKING: Alibi Anomalies in the Charlie Kirk Investigation? This CitiBank Receipt Raises SERIOUS Red Flags! 🔍🤯 Folks, let's talk facts: In a standard CitiBank mobile app or online receipt, the button for disputing a charge is ALWAYS "Dispute Charge" – both words capitalized. But in the screenshot provided as part of Cabot Phillips' alibi? It's "Dispute charge" with a lowercase 'c'. This is NOT standard. Multiple verified screenshots and app guides confirm the consistent capitalization. This irregularity could indicate an abnormality, such as a potential digital alteration or Photoshop edit – or perhaps an outdated app version/glitch. Either way, it's highly unusual and not what we'd expect from an authentic, current Citi receipt. Why does this matter? It ties directly into the timeline around Charlie Kirk's tragic death. Witness Mitch Snow's testimony places key figures – including Erika Kirk and Brian Harpool – at Fort Huachuca on Sept. 8, 2025, specifically at the Candlewood Suites hotel, followed by a suspicious high-level meeting on the morning of Sept. 9 where the witness places Cabot Philips in attendance. Cabot Phillips (Erika's ex) shared this receipt and a Publix photo as an alibi to show he was in Nashville buying balloons on Sept. 8, far from Arizona. If the alibi holds, great – but these inconsistencies cast doubt. And it's not just the receipt. The Publix photo has its own red flags: The magazine rack behind him shows out-of-date issues that don't align with a Sept. 8 snapshot. People Magazine: The visible issue is the Sept. 1, 2025, edition featuring Helen Mirren. But grocery stores like Publix update racks weekly – religiously, often stocking the next issue in advance. By Sept. 8, the Sept. 8 (or later) issue should have been out, meaning this older Sept. 1 copy is unusually outdated for that date. Time Magazine's Special Edition 50th Anniversary Jaws: This collector's issue was released on July 11, 2025 (tied to the documentary premiere), but investigations revealed it wasn't widely available in stores until after Aug. 29 (theater re-release date). Yet it's prominently displayed – another timing mismatch that suggests the photo might not be from Sept. 8 as claimed. Adding to the questions: Another photo shared by Cabot Phillips – a family snapshot with a balloon, purportedly taken in Nashville on Sept. 8 at 6:57 PM – shows signs of digital manipulation based on Error Level Analysis (ELA) from tools like FotoForensics. According to analysis by SCFactsOnly✝️🇬🇪, the ELA output reveals heavy pixelation, noise, and compression artifacts, especially in the semi-transparent date/location overlay ("Nashville September 8 6:57 PM"). This overlay stands out dramatically in ELA because text layers added digitally compress differently from the original photo content, making it a classic red flag for editing. The rest of the image shows more uniform compression, but varying noise patches suggest possible other adjustments. While there could be benign reasons (like app filters), this anomaly indicates the photo may have been altered – particularly the timestamp and location stamp – which could undermine its reliability as evidence of being in Nashville on that date. I'm not accusing anyone of faking anything – there could be innocent explanations, like a store with delayed stock, app variations, or photo editing for non-nefarious reasons. But based on the totality of circumstances – the non-standard capitalization on the receipt, the magazine date discrepancies, and now this ELA-detected irregularity in the family photo – these are irregular, highly unusual abnormalities that simply don't add up without more context. This warrants further investigation to get to the truth. Charlie's legacy deserves nothing less. If you're following the open-source probe, share this and demand answers. What do YOU think? 👇 Shoutout to Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸, SCFactsOnly✝️🇬🇪 and who has been steadfast in pointing out these inconsistencies and continuing the investigation on this matter. I would suggest everyone FOLLOW these guys. RT, Tag Candace Owens abd let me know your thoughts below.

Project Constitution

462,794 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Check out this recent Resolving Reality podcast with the brilliant Youtuber and commentator Christine Grace Smith Christine Grace Smith We discuss the impacts of feminism on the modern female, on men, and society as a whole, and some of the crazy behaviour we've been seeing in recent times. And perhaps most importantly - Sydney Sweeney's boobs get a mention. What an excellent and sometimes hilarious discussion🔥 Reposts appreciated 👍 Youtube version is down below 👇 00:00 - Start 01:13 - Intro 02:00 - Christine joins us 02:33 - How she got started on Youtube 04:59 - A mostly male audience 05:52 - Why she didn't become feminist herself 09:12 - Did her opinions create conflicts 11:29 - The 'sisterhood' problem 15:10 - How widespread the lunacy is 18:55 - The affects of all this on society 21:25 - Relations have become more miserable 21:45 - Emmet is a misogynist 22:45 - Can women survive without men? 26:45 - Females becoming more masculine 32:40 - Double-standards in behaviour 35:45 - The "provider' thing and cherry-picking 39:40 - Females making excuses for bad behaviour 43:51 - Emmet's struggles 44:30 - Spoiled for choice and commodification 47:20 - Bonnie Blue's compassion 49:30 - Objectification 53:55 - Sydney "Massive Jugs" Sweeney 55:15 - Using attractiveness for positive reasons 57:20 - How entitled behaviour stunts personal evolution 58:55 - Struggle leading to fulfilment 1:02:35 - Feminism leading women astray 1:04:40 - Should men stop treating women well? 1:09:30 - Males shunning problematic females 1:12:00 - Men challenging this behaviour more 1:13:40 - The system is biased against males 1:16:05 - Discouraging young females away from feminism 1:19:30 - Christine's new channel and future plans 1:20:40 - Outro 1:21:15 - Closing spiel
1:21:34

Check out this recent Resolving Reality podcast with the brilliant Youtuber and commentator Christine Grace Smith Christine Grace Smith We discuss the impacts of feminism on the modern female, on men, and society as a whole, and some of the crazy behaviour we've been seeing in recent times. And perhaps most importantly - Sydney Sweeney's boobs get a mention. What an excellent and sometimes hilarious discussion🔥 Reposts appreciated 👍 Youtube version is down below 👇 00:00 - Start 01:13 - Intro 02:00 - Christine joins us 02:33 - How she got started on Youtube 04:59 - A mostly male audience 05:52 - Why she didn't become feminist herself 09:12 - Did her opinions create conflicts 11:29 - The 'sisterhood' problem 15:10 - How widespread the lunacy is 18:55 - The affects of all this on society 21:25 - Relations have become more miserable 21:45 - Emmet is a misogynist 22:45 - Can women survive without men? 26:45 - Females becoming more masculine 32:40 - Double-standards in behaviour 35:45 - The "provider' thing and cherry-picking 39:40 - Females making excuses for bad behaviour 43:51 - Emmet's struggles 44:30 - Spoiled for choice and commodification 47:20 - Bonnie Blue's compassion 49:30 - Objectification 53:55 - Sydney "Massive Jugs" Sweeney 55:15 - Using attractiveness for positive reasons 57:20 - How entitled behaviour stunts personal evolution 58:55 - Struggle leading to fulfilment 1:02:35 - Feminism leading women astray 1:04:40 - Should men stop treating women well? 1:09:30 - Males shunning problematic females 1:12:00 - Men challenging this behaviour more 1:13:40 - The system is biased against males 1:16:05 - Discouraging young females away from feminism 1:19:30 - Christine's new channel and future plans 1:20:40 - Outro 1:21:15 - Closing spiel

Emmet Connor

86,007 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

** An open letter to Anthony Albanese ** Dear Prime Minister Albanese, Let’s get one thing clear: women are adult human females. You know it, I know it, you even said it in the lead up to the last election when asked “what is a woman” by Piers Morgan. But we have a big problem. I’m sure you have heard, last week, the Federal Court delivered its judgment in Giggle v Tickle, the “what is a woman” legal case that has been fighting in federal court for the past four years. To put it very simply, there are two sides to this case: women, adult human females, who want to ensure that woman is a single-sex category in law and women & girls have access to single sex spaces. The other side, which includes your human rights commission, insists that men who claim to be women are women in the eyes of the law. The full Federal Court sided with the man who claims to be a woman. Yes. A male won the “what is a woman” court case. Giggle v Tickle has turned Australia into an international laughing stock. This decision is seismic. It means women cannot run women-only businesses for women. It confirms that the ordinary meaning of sex has been twisted beyond recognition. It means men can be women in law. The Australian Human Rights Commission, captured by ideology, has weaponised the sex discrimination act against women, the very demographic it was enacted to protect. They’ve even argued in court that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections. They’ve pushed the view that sex is a spectrum, changeable, and that anyone objecting is the bigot. Is this something you agree with? Do you, Mr Prime Minister, think men need pregnancy protections in the law? And there are real-world stakes here: Girls at school are holding their bladders all day, refusing to drink water, because boys who claim to be girls are in their bathrooms and they don’t want them there. Women prisoners are locked in cells with male sex offenders who simply “identify” as women. Female athletes are losing podiums, matches and safety. This isn’t inclusion - it’s the demise of women’s rights. Prime Minister, some of your ministers say, “we need to protect trans rights”. With all due respect, sir, your government can protect so called trans rights without stripping rights from women and girls. Every other citizen manages to exist without demanding access to the opposite sex’s protected spaces. Why not try to get “trans rights” without destroying the rights of women and girls? Have you ever even tried? The fact that Labor hasn’t even mentioned Giggle v Tickle and women’s rights - while Liberals, Nationals, and One Nation politicians speak out - tells us everything. This week has been silence from the Labor Party. No trans visibility day parades on this one. No pride posts. Why? What don’t you want Australians to know? You boast about your 50 per cent women in cabinet. Good for you - you can accurately recognise what a woman is when it suits you. But the rest of us aren’t allowed to without fear of punishment. And can I ask, if you filled that cabinet with 50 per cent trans women, would you still call it equality between men and women? Think about that. While the UK, the United States and even New Zealand are waking up, rolling back the nonsense and restoring sanity and realizing that gender ideology is a failed experiment, your government is turning Australia into the laughing stock of the world. “Giggle v Tickle” isn’t just a punchline overseas - it’s proof Australia is upside down. I want to tell you something really important: If you will lie about something as obvious as men being women, we can assume you will look us in the eye and lie about everything. Tell the truth. Fix the Sex Discrimination Act. Reinstate clear biological, accurate definitions of man and woman. Protect women, girls and single-sex spaces. Actually do something. Because, at the moment, Mister Prime Minister, I’m doing your job for you.
5:22

** An open letter to Anthony Albanese ** Dear Prime Minister Albanese, Let’s get one thing clear: women are adult human females. You know it, I know it, you even said it in the lead up to the last election when asked “what is a woman” by Piers Morgan. But we have a big problem. I’m sure you have heard, last week, the Federal Court delivered its judgment in Giggle v Tickle, the “what is a woman” legal case that has been fighting in federal court for the past four years. To put it very simply, there are two sides to this case: women, adult human females, who want to ensure that woman is a single-sex category in law and women & girls have access to single sex spaces. The other side, which includes your human rights commission, insists that men who claim to be women are women in the eyes of the law. The full Federal Court sided with the man who claims to be a woman. Yes. A male won the “what is a woman” court case. Giggle v Tickle has turned Australia into an international laughing stock. This decision is seismic. It means women cannot run women-only businesses for women. It confirms that the ordinary meaning of sex has been twisted beyond recognition. It means men can be women in law. The Australian Human Rights Commission, captured by ideology, has weaponised the sex discrimination act against women, the very demographic it was enacted to protect. They’ve even argued in court that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections. They’ve pushed the view that sex is a spectrum, changeable, and that anyone objecting is the bigot. Is this something you agree with? Do you, Mr Prime Minister, think men need pregnancy protections in the law? And there are real-world stakes here: Girls at school are holding their bladders all day, refusing to drink water, because boys who claim to be girls are in their bathrooms and they don’t want them there. Women prisoners are locked in cells with male sex offenders who simply “identify” as women. Female athletes are losing podiums, matches and safety. This isn’t inclusion - it’s the demise of women’s rights. Prime Minister, some of your ministers say, “we need to protect trans rights”. With all due respect, sir, your government can protect so called trans rights without stripping rights from women and girls. Every other citizen manages to exist without demanding access to the opposite sex’s protected spaces. Why not try to get “trans rights” without destroying the rights of women and girls? Have you ever even tried? The fact that Labor hasn’t even mentioned Giggle v Tickle and women’s rights - while Liberals, Nationals, and One Nation politicians speak out - tells us everything. This week has been silence from the Labor Party. No trans visibility day parades on this one. No pride posts. Why? What don’t you want Australians to know? You boast about your 50 per cent women in cabinet. Good for you - you can accurately recognise what a woman is when it suits you. But the rest of us aren’t allowed to without fear of punishment. And can I ask, if you filled that cabinet with 50 per cent trans women, would you still call it equality between men and women? Think about that. While the UK, the United States and even New Zealand are waking up, rolling back the nonsense and restoring sanity and realizing that gender ideology is a failed experiment, your government is turning Australia into the laughing stock of the world. “Giggle v Tickle” isn’t just a punchline overseas - it’s proof Australia is upside down. I want to tell you something really important: If you will lie about something as obvious as men being women, we can assume you will look us in the eye and lie about everything. Tell the truth. Fix the Sex Discrimination Act. Reinstate clear biological, accurate definitions of man and woman. Protect women, girls and single-sex spaces. Actually do something. Because, at the moment, Mister Prime Minister, I’m doing your job for you.

Sall Grover

96,483 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

In 2021 CA began transferring men into women’s prisons. The results were entirely predictable: rape, assault, pregnancies. It’s so bad they’ve recently began distributing condoms to women in prison. In the midst of this dumpster fire, the folks running CA prisons just submitted a report to the legislature in March 2024 on sexual assault and prevention. It’s a real doozy. Link to full report in 🧵 There is not a SINGLE MENTION of sexual assault by male inmates and no plan to help mitigate or prevent such assault. Yet if you know where to look, there are tiny hints of the disaster they refuse to acknowledge. In one section it states, “For many years, only female staff members have searched female incarcerated persons. In January 2021, transgender, non-binary, and intersex persons were permitted to be searched by the gender of their preference.” Translation: Male inmates can demand a female staff member perform a strip search. What could go wrong? In August 2021, then WoLF Legal Director Lauren Adams testified to the California Senate Rules Committee that male inmates were getting ERECTIONS during these body searches. In response CA prisons now videotape all body searches & store the footage. (No one knows for how long.) Again and again, women’s privacy is being violated b/c of men. ❌Stop housing men in women’s prisons! ❌Stop this abusive and degrading practice! As a side note: The phrase “gender responsive” is used 10 times in the 11 page report. Can someone please tell me WTF that means? It clearly doesn’t mean being responsive to women’s safety and privacy in mind!
0:41

In 2021 CA began transferring men into women’s prisons. The results were entirely predictable: rape, assault, pregnancies. It’s so bad they’ve recently began distributing condoms to women in prison. In the midst of this dumpster fire, the folks running CA prisons just submitted a report to the legislature in March 2024 on sexual assault and prevention. It’s a real doozy. Link to full report in 🧵 There is not a SINGLE MENTION of sexual assault by male inmates and no plan to help mitigate or prevent such assault. Yet if you know where to look, there are tiny hints of the disaster they refuse to acknowledge. In one section it states, “For many years, only female staff members have searched female incarcerated persons. In January 2021, transgender, non-binary, and intersex persons were permitted to be searched by the gender of their preference.” Translation: Male inmates can demand a female staff member perform a strip search. What could go wrong? In August 2021, then WoLF Legal Director Lauren Adams testified to the California Senate Rules Committee that male inmates were getting ERECTIONS during these body searches. In response CA prisons now videotape all body searches & store the footage. (No one knows for how long.) Again and again, women’s privacy is being violated b/c of men. ❌Stop housing men in women’s prisons! ❌Stop this abusive and degrading practice! As a side note: The phrase “gender responsive” is used 10 times in the 11 page report. Can someone please tell me WTF that means? It clearly doesn’t mean being responsive to women’s safety and privacy in mind!

WomenAreReal

197,953 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

We’re in a weird place now where random girls have better insight into male psychology than most ‘pro-male’ accounts. Usually you do not want to take advice from women, but look what these chicks say: ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re unconfident (TRUE; many men are terrified to an almost hysterical degree of women right now) ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re lazy (TRUE; “why take the risk of approaching a girl when I can just open up an app?” → something far too many guys think now) ✅ If you get shot down, whatever; just go to the next girl (TRUE; she is not some magical special girl whose rejection has crippled you forever. Go approach another girl, and another after that! Meeting women is a NUMBERS GAME!) ✅ Be kind, don’t be weird (TRUE; there is a difference between being a ‘nice guy’ vs. just being a cool, warm-hearted, sociable dude. You do not have to be some cartoonish ‘alpha male’ and in fact that does not work. The ‘bad boys’ women are attracted to are generally actually kinder people than the average ‘nice guy’ is — they communicate what they really want, do not behave like they feel entitled to something from her, do not place her on a pedestal she can never hope to live up to, and don’t get weird or resentful or depressed when she flirts with or tests them) ✅ Approach with friendship as the basis (TRUE; so long as you do not MISINTERPRET this and think you need to be a neutered, asexual ‘friend’ instead. You need to be her SEXY friend, who is playful and flirtatious and a bit naughty, not the nice guy friend who acts like he has no balls and just wants to be her shoulder to cry on) As a matter of fact, I would actually say women’s advice to men has SOMEHOW STRANGELY IMPROVED over the last 15 years, while most men’s advice to other men has EGREGIOUSLY WORSENED. Men are online telling each other stuff like “you don’t need women; focus on the money and the women will come” (this will get you women who are after “a nice lifestyle”, i.e., gold diggers) and “never tolerate a woman who doesn’t put you first” (newsflash: until you are regularly banging her out, she is NEVER going to put you first!). Honestly, most advice I see men giving other men online nowadays is putting the cart before the horse type advice. Yes, you need money… but you should focus on that AFTER you get her. You are supposed to enjoy women young, then pick a woman and focus on building a life. A lot of dudes have it ass-backwards now. Yes, you need a woman who will put you first… but that comes AFTER you are banging her out. If you want her to do that before you shag her silly, you will be looking for a LONG time, my friend, as well as dating DOWN in a BIG way. Actually I was pretty surprised to hear these girls talk about “if you get rejected, go to the next one.” Back in the day a lot of girls seemed to always treat dating advice like “whatever girl you approach, treat her like your future wife!” Seems like there is a lot more consciousness among women at this point that dating is a numbers game and as a guy you’ve got to put in the reps. Strangely, men seem to have forgotten this… and approaching has become life and death… with dating apps the new ‘safe space’. Strange times we are in!
0:52

We’re in a weird place now where random girls have better insight into male psychology than most ‘pro-male’ accounts. Usually you do not want to take advice from women, but look what these chicks say: ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re unconfident (TRUE; many men are terrified to an almost hysterical degree of women right now) ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re lazy (TRUE; “why take the risk of approaching a girl when I can just open up an app?” → something far too many guys think now) ✅ If you get shot down, whatever; just go to the next girl (TRUE; she is not some magical special girl whose rejection has crippled you forever. Go approach another girl, and another after that! Meeting women is a NUMBERS GAME!) ✅ Be kind, don’t be weird (TRUE; there is a difference between being a ‘nice guy’ vs. just being a cool, warm-hearted, sociable dude. You do not have to be some cartoonish ‘alpha male’ and in fact that does not work. The ‘bad boys’ women are attracted to are generally actually kinder people than the average ‘nice guy’ is — they communicate what they really want, do not behave like they feel entitled to something from her, do not place her on a pedestal she can never hope to live up to, and don’t get weird or resentful or depressed when she flirts with or tests them) ✅ Approach with friendship as the basis (TRUE; so long as you do not MISINTERPRET this and think you need to be a neutered, asexual ‘friend’ instead. You need to be her SEXY friend, who is playful and flirtatious and a bit naughty, not the nice guy friend who acts like he has no balls and just wants to be her shoulder to cry on) As a matter of fact, I would actually say women’s advice to men has SOMEHOW STRANGELY IMPROVED over the last 15 years, while most men’s advice to other men has EGREGIOUSLY WORSENED. Men are online telling each other stuff like “you don’t need women; focus on the money and the women will come” (this will get you women who are after “a nice lifestyle”, i.e., gold diggers) and “never tolerate a woman who doesn’t put you first” (newsflash: until you are regularly banging her out, she is NEVER going to put you first!). Honestly, most advice I see men giving other men online nowadays is putting the cart before the horse type advice. Yes, you need money… but you should focus on that AFTER you get her. You are supposed to enjoy women young, then pick a woman and focus on building a life. A lot of dudes have it ass-backwards now. Yes, you need a woman who will put you first… but that comes AFTER you are banging her out. If you want her to do that before you shag her silly, you will be looking for a LONG time, my friend, as well as dating DOWN in a BIG way. Actually I was pretty surprised to hear these girls talk about “if you get rejected, go to the next one.” Back in the day a lot of girls seemed to always treat dating advice like “whatever girl you approach, treat her like your future wife!” Seems like there is a lot more consciousness among women at this point that dating is a numbers game and as a guy you’ve got to put in the reps. Strangely, men seem to have forgotten this… and approaching has become life and death… with dating apps the new ‘safe space’. Strange times we are in!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

32,048 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Something must be done about the very obvious and intentional Islamic takeover of America “There is an Islamic invasion happening in America right now, whether you see it or not. The mayor of New York City is a Muslim. The mayor of Dearborn, Michigan is a Muslim. The mayor of St. Louis Park is a Muslim, and the mayor candidate of Minneapolis is a Muslim. Islam for the last 1,400 years have never coexisted with any people, any color, any tribe. — I'm talking from experience. You see, I grew up in Egypt, and Egypt 1,400 years ago was a Christian country. We were 90% Christian 1,400 years ago until Islam came in our country. They conquered it, they burnt our churches, killed our men, raped the women, took the kids, and turned them Muslim. And now Egypt is 90% Muslim and 10% Christian. So I'm coming to you from the future to warn you that America might end up this way if the men of America do not wake up.” The Islamic takeover is well underway, and it’s worse than you realize We already have roughly 25 Muslim mayors elected throughout America and even more horrifying, about 235 Muslim elected officials In 2025 alone, 42 additional Muslims were elected in America. 4 Muslims are in Congress
1:42

Something must be done about the very obvious and intentional Islamic takeover of America “There is an Islamic invasion happening in America right now, whether you see it or not. The mayor of New York City is a Muslim. The mayor of Dearborn, Michigan is a Muslim. The mayor of St. Louis Park is a Muslim, and the mayor candidate of Minneapolis is a Muslim. Islam for the last 1,400 years have never coexisted with any people, any color, any tribe. — I'm talking from experience. You see, I grew up in Egypt, and Egypt 1,400 years ago was a Christian country. We were 90% Christian 1,400 years ago until Islam came in our country. They conquered it, they burnt our churches, killed our men, raped the women, took the kids, and turned them Muslim. And now Egypt is 90% Muslim and 10% Christian. So I'm coming to you from the future to warn you that America might end up this way if the men of America do not wake up.” The Islamic takeover is well underway, and it’s worse than you realize We already have roughly 25 Muslim mayors elected throughout America and even more horrifying, about 235 Muslim elected officials In 2025 alone, 42 additional Muslims were elected in America. 4 Muslims are in Congress

Wall Street Apes

745,370 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.
2:35

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Sall Grover

33,499 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

PARDON SAMOURAI (full episode) Keonne Rodriguez w/Walker⚡️ Today I talk with Keonne Rodriguez, co-founder of Samourai Wallet, who is set to report to prison on December 19 unless he and his co-founder Bill get a pardon from President Trump... In April 2024, two Bitcoin software developers, Keonne Rodriguez and William "Bill" Lonergan Hill, were violently arrested in their homes in a pre-dawn militarized raid by the FBI for running Samourai Wallet—a non-custodial Bitcoin wallet—despite no prior warnings and full compliance with the law as they and their advisors understood it. They spent the next year and a half in the crippling uncertainty of home arrest, fighting against an adversary with unlimited resources. Keonne was sentenced on November 6, 2025, to the maximum five years in prison, plus an additional fine of $250,000, plus three years of supervised release. Bill was sentenced to four years in prison on November 19, 2025. He will also be responsible for a $250,000 fine, and three years of supervised release. Both men are facing serious time in jail for writing code that supported the privacy and security of Bitcoin users. This case exemplifies DOJ overreach through a dangerous legal theory that criminalizes open-source code for legitimate privacy purposes. **Developers should not be held liable for bad actors using their software.** 0:00 INTRO 2:00 Context of the Case 5:12 The Motivation Behind Samurai Wallet 7:54 The Evolution of Bitcoin and Privacy Concerns 10:59 The Raid and Its Implications 13:59 Understanding the Legal Framework 16:47 The Distinction Between Samurai Wallet and Traditional Mixers 20:02 Regulatory Guidance and Miscommunication 22:48 The Role of the Justice System 25:54 Jurisdiction and the Southern District of New York 32:56 Jurisdiction and Prosecution Tactics 36:41 The Reality of Legal Battles 39:55 Financial Strain and Legal Fees 44:31 Plea Deal Dynamics 52:59 The Absurdity of Charges 1:02:05 The Broader Implications of the Case 1:04:18 The Blanch Memo and Its Implications 1:07:53 The Southern District of New York’s Disregard for Guidelines 1:12:21 The Flawed Prosecution and Lack of Evidence 1:16:55 The Importance of Open Source and Community Action 1:22:40 Hope for the Future and the Call to Action #pardonsamourai #freesamourai
1:35:21

PARDON SAMOURAI (full episode) Keonne Rodriguez w/Walker⚡️ Today I talk with Keonne Rodriguez, co-founder of Samourai Wallet, who is set to report to prison on December 19 unless he and his co-founder Bill get a pardon from President Trump... In April 2024, two Bitcoin software developers, Keonne Rodriguez and William "Bill" Lonergan Hill, were violently arrested in their homes in a pre-dawn militarized raid by the FBI for running Samourai Wallet—a non-custodial Bitcoin wallet—despite no prior warnings and full compliance with the law as they and their advisors understood it. They spent the next year and a half in the crippling uncertainty of home arrest, fighting against an adversary with unlimited resources. Keonne was sentenced on November 6, 2025, to the maximum five years in prison, plus an additional fine of $250,000, plus three years of supervised release. Bill was sentenced to four years in prison on November 19, 2025. He will also be responsible for a $250,000 fine, and three years of supervised release. Both men are facing serious time in jail for writing code that supported the privacy and security of Bitcoin users. This case exemplifies DOJ overreach through a dangerous legal theory that criminalizes open-source code for legitimate privacy purposes. **Developers should not be held liable for bad actors using their software.** 0:00 INTRO 2:00 Context of the Case 5:12 The Motivation Behind Samurai Wallet 7:54 The Evolution of Bitcoin and Privacy Concerns 10:59 The Raid and Its Implications 13:59 Understanding the Legal Framework 16:47 The Distinction Between Samurai Wallet and Traditional Mixers 20:02 Regulatory Guidance and Miscommunication 22:48 The Role of the Justice System 25:54 Jurisdiction and the Southern District of New York 32:56 Jurisdiction and Prosecution Tactics 36:41 The Reality of Legal Battles 39:55 Financial Strain and Legal Fees 44:31 Plea Deal Dynamics 52:59 The Absurdity of Charges 1:02:05 The Broader Implications of the Case 1:04:18 The Blanch Memo and Its Implications 1:07:53 The Southern District of New York’s Disregard for Guidelines 1:12:21 The Flawed Prosecution and Lack of Evidence 1:16:55 The Importance of Open Source and Community Action 1:22:40 Hope for the Future and the Call to Action #pardonsamourai #freesamourai

THE Bitcoin Podcast

13,687 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

CRIME ALERT: From 1pm TODAY broadcast live on Sky Sports: a man will be stealing up to £10,000 prize money and kudos that belongs to women in a FLAGRANT breach of the Equality Act 2010. PREVIOUS CRIMES: THEFT of £16,200 of women’s darts prize money (2024-25) PERPETRATOR: Noa-Lynn van Leuven (male) aided and abetted by the Professional Darts Company, Sky Sports and Betfred The Dutch man van Leuven takes his place alongside seven of the world’s TOP female darts players at Blackpool’s Winter Garden. One woman is missing because van Leuven (who is seeded second in the tournament) has taken a place on the women’s team. The competitors in the 2025 Betfred Women’s World Matchplay are the top eight female darts players based on the prize money they have accrued over the previous 12 months in the Matchplay Series. Top is Beau Greaves (earnings £33,800), van Leuven is in second place with £16,200 of ill-gotten gains that belong to women. As an aside the top women’s prize of £10,000 pales into insignificance compared with the £200,000 top prize in the Open Matchplay tournament for the top men (and any woman who can break through). The PDC Darts knows it’s breaking the law because WRN has written to CEO Matthew Porter several times (no replies). We’re willing to lay a wager that the sponsors Betfred know the law is being broken. The broadcaster Sky Sports knows the law is being broken but they’re so far up the gender woo back alley they don’t care. It’s been 102 days since the Supreme Court clarified that in law the word woman means biological female. Why is PDC continuing to break the law? Could the PDC have a woman problem… maybe when you list 34 PDC personnel on your website and only ONE (the Head of Admin) is a woman, then you might not be living in the real world where 51% of the population is female. PDC… you’re on borrowed time. The LAW is the LAW and you’re breaking it. Darts is big money nowadays so we’re sure you have a fighting fund ready for the sex discrimination cases coming your way. Just sayin’…
0:32

CRIME ALERT: From 1pm TODAY broadcast live on Sky Sports: a man will be stealing up to £10,000 prize money and kudos that belongs to women in a FLAGRANT breach of the Equality Act 2010. PREVIOUS CRIMES: THEFT of £16,200 of women’s darts prize money (2024-25) PERPETRATOR: Noa-Lynn van Leuven (male) aided and abetted by the Professional Darts Company, Sky Sports and Betfred The Dutch man van Leuven takes his place alongside seven of the world’s TOP female darts players at Blackpool’s Winter Garden. One woman is missing because van Leuven (who is seeded second in the tournament) has taken a place on the women’s team. The competitors in the 2025 Betfred Women’s World Matchplay are the top eight female darts players based on the prize money they have accrued over the previous 12 months in the Matchplay Series. Top is Beau Greaves (earnings £33,800), van Leuven is in second place with £16,200 of ill-gotten gains that belong to women. As an aside the top women’s prize of £10,000 pales into insignificance compared with the £200,000 top prize in the Open Matchplay tournament for the top men (and any woman who can break through). The PDC Darts knows it’s breaking the law because WRN has written to CEO Matthew Porter several times (no replies). We’re willing to lay a wager that the sponsors Betfred know the law is being broken. The broadcaster Sky Sports knows the law is being broken but they’re so far up the gender woo back alley they don’t care. It’s been 102 days since the Supreme Court clarified that in law the word woman means biological female. Why is PDC continuing to break the law? Could the PDC have a woman problem… maybe when you list 34 PDC personnel on your website and only ONE (the Head of Admin) is a woman, then you might not be living in the real world where 51% of the population is female. PDC… you’re on borrowed time. The LAW is the LAW and you’re breaking it. Darts is big money nowadays so we’re sure you have a fighting fund ready for the sex discrimination cases coming your way. Just sayin’…

Women's Rights Network - WRN

41,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr