正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Forget about the “colored sorority” comment for a second & think about what he’s asking: Why hasn’t someone who’s been a presidential for 3 days done a 1-on-1 interview like her opponent (who hasn’t done hasn’t done one in 2 months)? Why would a presidential candidate want to address... an organization that represents 350,000 of the most loyal voters who outperform every other demographic? If Harris missing Netanyahu’s speech is such a travesty, why didn’t he mention the fact that she will meet with him separately at the White House? You think he knows that MOST Republicans boycotted the last speech to Congress by a visiting head of state? Even though Brian Kilmeade has a history of white nationalism, right-wing extremism, Islamophobia and scientific racism, here’s why I would NEVER call Brian Kilmeade racist or accuse him of being biased: A lot of what we attribute to privilege or racism can more easily be explained by something much simpler. It’s likely that Brian doesn’t KNOW that calling someone “colored” can be considered a racial slur. Who would tell him? His white cohosts? Fox News’ 94% white, 1% Black audience? Most people know because of their life experience life experience? Well, he attended a high school that less was than 1% Black going to college play soccer in a 1% Black town. Then he was a UFC commentator and a sports talk show host. He has never worked in politics or covered it as a journalist. Now if you’re asking how a failed soccer player turned sports reporter got a job covering politics on the most watched political platform in America, the answer is: HOW THE FUCK WOUKD I KNOW? In any case, the fact that the host of one of cable news’ most-watched shows doesn’t know things is irrelevant. He doesn’t HAVE to know things. Not knowing things has not impacted his life in any way. If Brian Kilmeade was Black, Brian Kilmeade would DEFINITELY call Brian Kilmeade a diversity hire. He is living proof of one thing we all know: Being dumb is a white privilegeshow more

Michael Harriot

459,917 subscribers

186,394 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

Sun of the Spirit⚡️ 的头像

Sun of the Spirit⚡️2 年前

A colored sorority?? Is this 1942?? Wth??

Jennifer F. Murphy 的头像

Jennifer F. Murphy2 年前

I live in one of the whitest states in the nation, and I know saying "colored" in that context is racist. Come on, man.

WinOne4Drew 的头像

WinOne4Drew2 年前

Michael, what's sad is that his Black co-host didn't correct him. I may have missed that part.

Wendell P. Carter 的头像

Wendell P. Carter2 年前

So Colored is being reissued this election cycle?

SHough610 的头像

SHough6102 年前

Michael, that graph is interesting. I wonder if it’s a coincidence that Black voter turnout eclipsed white turnout and voter ID suddenly became a priority

Clarence Hill Jr 的头像

Clarence Hill Jr2 年前

@OhThatsAT Boom

BLACK FAMILIES AGAINST TRUMP 的头像

BLACK FAMILIES AGAINST TRUMP2 年前

Michael I respect you but stop making excuses for him. My grandmother's birth certificate says colored and she was born in 1918!

Rick Scott 的头像

Rick Scott2 年前

I used several interpretation apps and they all pick up “colored”

Blue 的头像

Blue2 年前

Colored? Really? Is Kilmead showing his colors? #Racist

相关视频

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

RedWave Press

730,069 次观看 • 4 个月前

You really can’t trust Brian Kilmeade’s judgement. Kilmeade said I shouldn’t have any credibility and that Trump should just accept his White House not properly vetting people. This is the same Brian Kilmeade who said the election wasn’t stolen and who called Donald J. Trump “unhinged” before the J6 protests at the Capitol. This is a man who has made his living reading a teleprompter to the American people at a Rupert Murdoch owned entity. Donald Trump has every right to be angry. The 2020 election was stolen and everyone aside from the dumbasses over at Fox News can see that! Brian Kilmeade wants Donald Trump to lose. You cannot trust him. That’s why he wants to smear me. He is a dishonest person and deep down, he’s a Trump hater who wanted him replaced by Ron DeSantis.

You really can’t trust Brian Kilmeade’s judgement. Kilmeade said I shouldn’t have any credibility and that Trump should just accept his White House not properly vetting people. This is the same Brian Kilmeade who said the election wasn’t stolen and who called Donald J. Trump “unhinged” before the J6 protests at the Capitol. This is a man who has made his living reading a teleprompter to the American people at a Rupert Murdoch owned entity. Donald Trump has every right to be angry. The 2020 election was stolen and everyone aside from the dumbasses over at Fox News can see that! Brian Kilmeade wants Donald Trump to lose. You cannot trust him. That’s why he wants to smear me. He is a dishonest person and deep down, he’s a Trump hater who wanted him replaced by Ron DeSantis.

Laura Loomer

458,855 次观看 • 1 年前

Tucker Carlson reveals Charlie Kirk’s greatest “sin” — the one that cost him his life. Kirk’s death has clearly lit a fire under Carlson. This is two minutes of Tucker at his absolute best. “Charlie was not a Nazi. He was not killed because he was a Nazi. Yes, he was a defender of Israel. He didn’t die for Israel. However, why did he die? What was his life about? What was the sin, the core sin that Charlie Kirk committed against somebody, power that got him killed in the end? “And, the answer is right in front of us, certainly those of us who knew him. Charlie’s life was defined by his Christian faith, not his spirituality, but his belief in Jesus, his life as a Christian. Everything in his life flowed from those beliefs. Everything. “Everything he did, said and believed came from the fact that he was above all, a Christian. And that is and was and in fact has always been deeply provocative and offensive to the rest of the world. “And why is that? It’s worth thinking about it for just a second. Christianity doesn’t seem like the kind of religion that provoke people to anger and violence. In fact, it seems just the opposite. It’s the world’s most profoundly nonviolent religion. Maybe the world’s only truly nonviolent religion, a religion based on a man who Christians believe was also God, who, as he was being led away to be tortured to death on made up charges, scolded one of his disciples for fighting back. “This is a religion committed to love above all and to living in peace and harmony. Truly, it’s a universalist religion that believes that every person has a shot at heaven. It’s not exclusionary at all. And so you would think it would make sense that if you’re a government or if you’re in power, that you’d want a lot of Christians living in your country because they’re not going to cause massive problems. “Not a lot of sincere Christians are fomenting insurrection at any given moment. Pretty much none. Most of the time they’re tidy. They get married, they love their children, they pay their taxes. They’re commanded to pay their taxes. So why wouldn’t you want a nation full of Christians? “Why wouldn’t you encourage this religious belief, even if it wasn’t yours? Why would you hate it? Well, there are a couple of reasons. There are a couple of things about Christianity, and these were evident throughout Charlie’s public life, that are deeply provocative to the people in power. “And the first is the insistence that Christianity comes with inherently that you are not God, you are not God and neither are your leaders. God is God and all of us stand before him in the end to be judged and all of us will be found lacking. “Christians believe the only way to heaven is through Jesus. That’s the only way. But all of us, whether we believe in Jesus or not, are fallen. We are sinners, we are less than we ought to be. We are not gods, and neither are the people who lead us.”

Tucker Carlson reveals Charlie Kirk’s greatest “sin” — the one that cost him his life. Kirk’s death has clearly lit a fire under Carlson. This is two minutes of Tucker at his absolute best. “Charlie was not a Nazi. He was not killed because he was a Nazi. Yes, he was a defender of Israel. He didn’t die for Israel. However, why did he die? What was his life about? What was the sin, the core sin that Charlie Kirk committed against somebody, power that got him killed in the end? “And, the answer is right in front of us, certainly those of us who knew him. Charlie’s life was defined by his Christian faith, not his spirituality, but his belief in Jesus, his life as a Christian. Everything in his life flowed from those beliefs. Everything. “Everything he did, said and believed came from the fact that he was above all, a Christian. And that is and was and in fact has always been deeply provocative and offensive to the rest of the world. “And why is that? It’s worth thinking about it for just a second. Christianity doesn’t seem like the kind of religion that provoke people to anger and violence. In fact, it seems just the opposite. It’s the world’s most profoundly nonviolent religion. Maybe the world’s only truly nonviolent religion, a religion based on a man who Christians believe was also God, who, as he was being led away to be tortured to death on made up charges, scolded one of his disciples for fighting back. “This is a religion committed to love above all and to living in peace and harmony. Truly, it’s a universalist religion that believes that every person has a shot at heaven. It’s not exclusionary at all. And so you would think it would make sense that if you’re a government or if you’re in power, that you’d want a lot of Christians living in your country because they’re not going to cause massive problems. “Not a lot of sincere Christians are fomenting insurrection at any given moment. Pretty much none. Most of the time they’re tidy. They get married, they love their children, they pay their taxes. They’re commanded to pay their taxes. So why wouldn’t you want a nation full of Christians? “Why wouldn’t you encourage this religious belief, even if it wasn’t yours? Why would you hate it? Well, there are a couple of reasons. There are a couple of things about Christianity, and these were evident throughout Charlie’s public life, that are deeply provocative to the people in power. “And the first is the insistence that Christianity comes with inherently that you are not God, you are not God and neither are your leaders. God is God and all of us stand before him in the end to be judged and all of us will be found lacking. “Christians believe the only way to heaven is through Jesus. That’s the only way. But all of us, whether we believe in Jesus or not, are fallen. We are sinners, we are less than we ought to be. We are not gods, and neither are the people who lead us.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

941,813 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 LMFAO! President Trump just trolled the CRAP out of Gavin Newsom in the Oval Office, he's about to lose it 🤣 "Gavin Newsom admitted that he is learning disabilities, dyslexia, everything about him is DUMB." "I call him a RACIST because it happened to be a black audience!" "Gavin Newscum has admitted that he is a that he has learning disabilities. Honestly, I'm all for people with learning disabilities, but not for my president!" "I think a president should not have learning disabilities. OK. And I know it's highly controversial to say such a horrible thing." "Now on top of everything else, I call him a racist because it happened to be a black audience." "I will tell you this. I think it was the worst interview I've ever seen of any human being in my life!"

🚨 LMFAO! President Trump just trolled the CRAP out of Gavin Newsom in the Oval Office, he's about to lose it 🤣 "Gavin Newsom admitted that he is learning disabilities, dyslexia, everything about him is DUMB." "I call him a RACIST because it happened to be a black audience!" "Gavin Newscum has admitted that he is a that he has learning disabilities. Honestly, I'm all for people with learning disabilities, but not for my president!" "I think a president should not have learning disabilities. OK. And I know it's highly controversial to say such a horrible thing." "Now on top of everything else, I call him a racist because it happened to be a black audience." "I will tell you this. I think it was the worst interview I've ever seen of any human being in my life!"

Eric Daugherty

285,891 次观看 • 4 个月前

Former Fox News host Geraldo Rivera: “By focusing on the censorship aspect and the First Amendment aspect, it’s losing sight of what should be the lead and that’s that Jimmy Kimmel owes the family of Charlie Kirk and his wife Erika, two small children, an apology. You know, you know, what’s he saying? That if you’re if you’re a member of MAGA and Charlie is a friend of MAG, of MAGA, then he had it coming. It’s just — it’s — it’s in some ways — it’s very — it’s — extremely — extremely insensitive. The country is in a country is in a very tough spot right now. Everyone is walking on eggshells. The First Amendment is not a license to incite hatred and, you know, I think that we can think that we can start the discussion once Jimmy Kimmel apologizes, then they can talk about the business aspects and whether or not he gets whether or not he gets back on the schedule and so forth, but there’s got to there’s got to be a recognition that a terrible thing has happened here, and that millions of Americans are grievously hurt by what happened. You know, there is a — Charlie Kirk was beloved by many. And to just trample over it. He’s not even buried yet for goodness sake. And to make fun of the flags at half staff and so forth. I just half staff and so forth. I just think that we’ve got to look at it with a — with a notion that the country has to be healed, that we have to work to bring people together, that we need to respect each other. You know, we don’t have to agree, but we have to respect. And I think that, you know, the audience has deserted him for a good reason.”

Former Fox News host Geraldo Rivera: “By focusing on the censorship aspect and the First Amendment aspect, it’s losing sight of what should be the lead and that’s that Jimmy Kimmel owes the family of Charlie Kirk and his wife Erika, two small children, an apology. You know, you know, what’s he saying? That if you’re if you’re a member of MAGA and Charlie is a friend of MAG, of MAGA, then he had it coming. It’s just — it’s — it’s in some ways — it’s very — it’s — extremely — extremely insensitive. The country is in a country is in a very tough spot right now. Everyone is walking on eggshells. The First Amendment is not a license to incite hatred and, you know, I think that we can think that we can start the discussion once Jimmy Kimmel apologizes, then they can talk about the business aspects and whether or not he gets whether or not he gets back on the schedule and so forth, but there’s got to there’s got to be a recognition that a terrible thing has happened here, and that millions of Americans are grievously hurt by what happened. You know, there is a — Charlie Kirk was beloved by many. And to just trample over it. He’s not even buried yet for goodness sake. And to make fun of the flags at half staff and so forth. I just half staff and so forth. I just think that we’ve got to look at it with a — with a notion that the country has to be healed, that we have to work to bring people together, that we need to respect each other. You know, we don’t have to agree, but we have to respect. And I think that, you know, the audience has deserted him for a good reason.”

Curtis Houck

825,225 次观看 • 10 个月前

Did you know it was a BLACK MAN, Anthony Johnson, who was the very FIRST slave owner in America? But not only was he the first, he was the man who started the entire practice of lifelong slavery in America after suing to keep his slaves for life rather than the usual indentured servitude of 7 years. It was after he won in court and established a precedent that white men and nearly 4,000 other black men adopted the practice of holding slaves for life. This is what THE LEFT doesn’t want you to know so that they can continue to use RACISM to their advantage.

Did you know it was a BLACK MAN, Anthony Johnson, who was the very FIRST slave owner in America? But not only was he the first, he was the man who started the entire practice of lifelong slavery in America after suing to keep his slaves for life rather than the usual indentured servitude of 7 years. It was after he won in court and established a precedent that white men and nearly 4,000 other black men adopted the practice of holding slaves for life. This is what THE LEFT doesn’t want you to know so that they can continue to use RACISM to their advantage.

Don Keith

323,795 次观看 • 5 个月前

"No shade. Gary Owen is a f*cking legend. ... Gary was great in 'Think Like A Man.' He was so good in that sh*t, but because a lot of Hollywood and the entertainment industry just thinks: 'Oh, he only has a Black audience, I don't know if White people would go see him.' I feel like that hinders a lot of his opportunities. I feel like he deserves a lot more." - Matt Rife

"No shade. Gary Owen is a fcking legend. ... Gary was great in 'Think Like A Man.' He was so good in that sht, but because a lot of Hollywood and the entertainment industry just thinks: 'Oh, he only has a Black audience, I don't know if White people would go see him.' I feel like that hinders a lot of his opportunities. I feel like he deserves a lot more." - Matt Rife

Club Shay Shay

303,637 次观看 • 4 个月前

I give Justin Gaethje a lot of credit for sitting up there at a UFC press conference and saying what he did yesterday. Here’s a guy who’s one of the greatest fighters in UFC history, who’s reaching the end of his career, the end of the road, and he’s looking around and saying, “I don’t have much to show for it.” And after Dana White’s comments today, it would be nice to know, No. 1, is that true? Was Gaethje offered a contract and he didn’t respond? If that is true, why not respond? If the answer to the first question is, “I never received anything,” then we have to go to Ali Abdelaziz. If the answer to that is yes, why didn’t you extend that offer to your client? And if the answer to that is no, well then someone is clearly lying here.

I give Justin Gaethje a lot of credit for sitting up there at a UFC press conference and saying what he did yesterday. Here’s a guy who’s one of the greatest fighters in UFC history, who’s reaching the end of his career, the end of the road, and he’s looking around and saying, “I don’t have much to show for it.” And after Dana White’s comments today, it would be nice to know, No. 1, is that true? Was Gaethje offered a contract and he didn’t respond? If that is true, why not respond? If the answer to the first question is, “I never received anything,” then we have to go to Ali Abdelaziz. If the answer to that is yes, why didn’t you extend that offer to your client? And if the answer to that is no, well then someone is clearly lying here.

Ariel Helwani

254,642 次观看 • 5 个月前

Moulton: It’s not surprising that Trump doesn’t know that—he’s not a student of history, but I think, more to the point, he doesn’t have any sons or daughters who served in the military after 9/11. They’re all about my age; they all could have done their part. If just one of them had signed up, maybe he would know that we served on the ground alongside Canadian troops, French troops, troops from the UK, the Danes, the Poles—all these NATO countries—And you know, they lost a lot of lives there

Moulton: It’s not surprising that Trump doesn’t know that—he’s not a student of history, but I think, more to the point, he doesn’t have any sons or daughters who served in the military after 9/11. They’re all about my age; they all could have done their part. If just one of them had signed up, maybe he would know that we served on the ground alongside Canadian troops, French troops, troops from the UK, the Danes, the Poles—all these NATO countries—And you know, they lost a lot of lives there

Acyn

434,679 次观看 • 1 年前

If this person is telling the truth about who Charlie Kirk was in high school, then we understand his origin story: 1/ Bully 2/ Mediocre 3/ Victim mentality 4/ Racist, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic The Right wing is a grievance industry for mediocre whites incapable of or unwilling to compete with other racial/ethic groups & their own women. And they have no metric for competence due to white supremacy. In their minds, whiteness equals superiority, which explains why Kirk blamed an “imaginary Black” for taking his spot at West Point. As if West Point ever owed him a spot. As if being white & male should’ve assured him a spot at America’s most elite military academy. This would also explain how Kirk ended up at community college instead of Yale, Brown or Harvard. He was average or below average—a reality that he refused to accept. Instead of managing his mediocrity by working harder to improve himself, he cloaked his grievances in politics & fanned the flames of hatred. And it seems that he debated college students not out of a spirit of free speech & open debate, but because he was still nursing hurt feelings from that West Point rejection. He was out to prove to college students that he actually was better, smarter than them. He wasn’t. White fragility is a threat to the nation.

If this person is telling the truth about who Charlie Kirk was in high school, then we understand his origin story: 1/ Bully 2/ Mediocre 3/ Victim mentality 4/ Racist, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic The Right wing is a grievance industry for mediocre whites incapable of or unwilling to compete with other racial/ethic groups & their own women. And they have no metric for competence due to white supremacy. In their minds, whiteness equals superiority, which explains why Kirk blamed an “imaginary Black” for taking his spot at West Point. As if West Point ever owed him a spot. As if being white & male should’ve assured him a spot at America’s most elite military academy. This would also explain how Kirk ended up at community college instead of Yale, Brown or Harvard. He was average or below average—a reality that he refused to accept. Instead of managing his mediocrity by working harder to improve himself, he cloaked his grievances in politics & fanned the flames of hatred. And it seems that he debated college students not out of a spirit of free speech & open debate, but because he was still nursing hurt feelings from that West Point rejection. He was out to prove to college students that he actually was better, smarter than them. He wasn’t. White fragility is a threat to the nation.

Yvette Carnell 🇺🇸

42,017 次观看 • 9 个月前

Charlamagne The Fraud. In 2019 one of the first things he asked Kamala Harris about was her "being Black enough." In 2024 it's "We all know she is Black. Trump is a bigot." Biden told this clown straight to his face that he wasn't Black if he didn't vote for him.😂

Charlamagne The Fraud. In 2019 one of the first things he asked Kamala Harris about was her "being Black enough." In 2024 it's "We all know she is Black. Trump is a bigot." Biden told this clown straight to his face that he wasn't Black if he didn't vote for him.😂

MAZE

2,525,085 次观看 • 1 年前

This woman rented a car and was told to drop it off at this parking lot. The owner of the business where she is sitting in front of comes out and asks what she is doing. When she tells him she is dropping a rental car off he tells her this is where his business is and this isn’t a place to be dropping off cars. She asks him if he wants her to leave and he says yes. Then he goes back outside and takes pics of the license plate and of her and says the cops are on the way. She didn’t know any better and up until this point I would say she did nothing wrong. 💯 However, she then goes on to tell him that white people are going to be replaced, that white people will soon be working for black people, that his ancestors will be working for black people. 🤯 How and why would that exchange take a turn into those racial remarks? They disagreed but why was the last part even needed? Doesn’t that blow your mind? Can someone explain this?

This woman rented a car and was told to drop it off at this parking lot. The owner of the business where she is sitting in front of comes out and asks what she is doing. When she tells him she is dropping a rental car off he tells her this is where his business is and this isn’t a place to be dropping off cars. She asks him if he wants her to leave and he says yes. Then he goes back outside and takes pics of the license plate and of her and says the cops are on the way. She didn’t know any better and up until this point I would say she did nothing wrong. 💯 However, she then goes on to tell him that white people are going to be replaced, that white people will soon be working for black people, that his ancestors will be working for black people. 🤯 How and why would that exchange take a turn into those racial remarks? They disagreed but why was the last part even needed? Doesn’t that blow your mind? Can someone explain this?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

439,805 次观看 • 28 天前

Why is LIZ CROKIN defending ANDREW TATE? TATE: I became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam [porn] studio. By taking girls who had never been on webcam before … [and who] didn’t have the will … to make money with this exchange. I created a system that allowed me to convince girls to do this, allowed me to retain one hundred percent control of their income, allowed me to make sure they were effective … I learned every tip and trick it takes to make sure a girl gets paid. I know how to make sure the girl can’t run away. Because once you teach a girl how to do this, she has the ability to earn unlimited money from home. Why would she give it to you? Why wouldn’t she just run off? CROKIN: I don’t think it’s black and white, with him. … I think there’s a lot of truth to every viewpoint on his situation. … I guess he was involved in kind of encouraging girls to do OnlyFans type of stuff. I actually would really like to see him come out and, you know, um, speak out against that. And say that, you know, that was something he did in his past that was a mistake. You know, he regrets that. … Did he do anything that was criminal? I’m not sure, because I’ve heard that, you know, when he was doing his business, you know, he was in a country where the legal age of consent was 16. Um, but I didn’t know about the other girl possibly being 15. If she was, clearly that’s wrong, and it sounds like illegal, to me. I just don’t know enough about that to know if he has done anything criminal. I’ve also heard that there’s no victims that have come forward. I do believe that he is being unfairly persecuted. … Based off of what I’ve investigated about him, what he did comes nowhere close to what Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein and their associates are guilty of. I would love to see him ask for redemption. And to say, you know, porn isn’t the way, I regret doing this, any of the women, you know, that I brought into this, I’m sorry. MAGA is a very forgiving community. And I would like to see him encourage women to, you know, not get involved in porn, and to respect their bodies, and respect themselves. (Hey LIZ CROKIN, convincing women to do porn when they don’t have the will is recruitment. Doing it under the false pretense of a favor for a romantic partner is deception. Retaining their money is use of payment to control someone. Making sure they can’t run away is slavery. Andrew Tate literally confessed to being a trafficker, and you want to claim he’s being unfairly persecuted? REALLY? Other evidence of Tate’s violence, including his habit of strangling while raping his girlfriends, is circulating online. He doesn’t just pimp and enslave young women and girls. He teaches other men how to do it, too. This is not MAGA, and if someone in the MAGA movement wants to go easy on Andrew Tate, that is not someone we can trust.)

Why is LIZ CROKIN defending ANDREW TATE? TATE: I became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam [porn] studio. By taking girls who had never been on webcam before … [and who] didn’t have the will … to make money with this exchange. I created a system that allowed me to convince girls to do this, allowed me to retain one hundred percent control of their income, allowed me to make sure they were effective … I learned every tip and trick it takes to make sure a girl gets paid. I know how to make sure the girl can’t run away. Because once you teach a girl how to do this, she has the ability to earn unlimited money from home. Why would she give it to you? Why wouldn’t she just run off? CROKIN: I don’t think it’s black and white, with him. … I think there’s a lot of truth to every viewpoint on his situation. … I guess he was involved in kind of encouraging girls to do OnlyFans type of stuff. I actually would really like to see him come out and, you know, um, speak out against that. And say that, you know, that was something he did in his past that was a mistake. You know, he regrets that. … Did he do anything that was criminal? I’m not sure, because I’ve heard that, you know, when he was doing his business, you know, he was in a country where the legal age of consent was 16. Um, but I didn’t know about the other girl possibly being 15. If she was, clearly that’s wrong, and it sounds like illegal, to me. I just don’t know enough about that to know if he has done anything criminal. I’ve also heard that there’s no victims that have come forward. I do believe that he is being unfairly persecuted. … Based off of what I’ve investigated about him, what he did comes nowhere close to what Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein and their associates are guilty of. I would love to see him ask for redemption. And to say, you know, porn isn’t the way, I regret doing this, any of the women, you know, that I brought into this, I’m sorry. MAGA is a very forgiving community. And I would like to see him encourage women to, you know, not get involved in porn, and to respect their bodies, and respect themselves. (Hey LIZ CROKIN, convincing women to do porn when they don’t have the will is recruitment. Doing it under the false pretense of a favor for a romantic partner is deception. Retaining their money is use of payment to control someone. Making sure they can’t run away is slavery. Andrew Tate literally confessed to being a trafficker, and you want to claim he’s being unfairly persecuted? REALLY? Other evidence of Tate’s violence, including his habit of strangling while raping his girlfriends, is circulating online. He doesn’t just pimp and enslave young women and girls. He teaches other men how to do it, too. This is not MAGA, and if someone in the MAGA movement wants to go easy on Andrew Tate, that is not someone we can trust.)

Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

129,058 次观看 • 1 年前

🎥 Do you know how the general public views #WangYibo? He is actually looked up to by a lot of the young generation, not only because of his hobbies and skills, but also because of his attitude and mindset. A vlog from a musical actor is going viral because he mentioned that he wants to be Wang Yibo. “What I think is most impressive is that he hasn’t gotten completely caught up in the world of fame and fortune—he hasn’t fallen into the trap of chasing after these empty things. I really admire him for that. I think he keeps his personal life and celebrity life strictly separate. Many people get lost in the pursuit of money, fame, and status and can’t break free, but he’s managed to strike a great balance.”

🎥 Do you know how the general public views #WangYibo? He is actually looked up to by a lot of the young generation, not only because of his hobbies and skills, but also because of his attitude and mindset. A vlog from a musical actor is going viral because he mentioned that he wants to be Wang Yibo. “What I think is most impressive is that he hasn’t gotten completely caught up in the world of fame and fortune—he hasn’t fallen into the trap of chasing after these empty things. I really admire him for that. I think he keeps his personal life and celebrity life strictly separate. Many people get lost in the pursuit of money, fame, and status and can’t break free, but he’s managed to strike a great balance.”

WANG YIBO SOURCES

14,446 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Camus

41,966 次观看 • 10 个月前

🇸🇪 What is the King of Sweden Doing? Why Do I Still Support Him? • To understand why the Swedish king, Carl XVI Gustaf, is not stepping in to put an end to Sweden's descent into chaos, we need to take a brief look at Sweden's 20th century history. For most of the last century, Sweden was ruled by the Social Democrats – a party (true to form) that has basically always been hostile towards the monarchy. The deal was struck that the royal house could remain, but would not engage in politics. A great Damocles Sword has been hanging over the head of our king for his entire reign. Every word, every move – ready to be used against him by a regime hostile to the royal house. A pressure most men would crack under. • Throughout my life, my king is the only person in a position of power who has never tried to make me feel bad about who I am. • One could argue that what has been done to Sweden goes far beyond politics. Even so, it is hard to pin-point an exact moment in time when the king would have stepped in. The metaphorical frog has been boiling for a long time. That said, should he decide to, in some capacity, mark against what is going on, I, his loyal subject, would be most happy. Onwards!

🇸🇪 What is the King of Sweden Doing? Why Do I Still Support Him? • To understand why the Swedish king, Carl XVI Gustaf, is not stepping in to put an end to Sweden's descent into chaos, we need to take a brief look at Sweden's 20th century history. For most of the last century, Sweden was ruled by the Social Democrats – a party (true to form) that has basically always been hostile towards the monarchy. The deal was struck that the royal house could remain, but would not engage in politics. A great Damocles Sword has been hanging over the head of our king for his entire reign. Every word, every move – ready to be used against him by a regime hostile to the royal house. A pressure most men would crack under. • Throughout my life, my king is the only person in a position of power who has never tried to make me feel bad about who I am. • One could argue that what has been done to Sweden goes far beyond politics. Even so, it is hard to pin-point an exact moment in time when the king would have stepped in. The metaphorical frog has been boiling for a long time. That said, should he decide to, in some capacity, mark against what is going on, I, his loyal subject, would be most happy. Onwards!

The Golden One

20,784 次观看 • 1 年前

I had Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 on the show yesterday. It was great. He said something interesting about Brian Cole Jr. when I asked if he believed Brian was the pipe bomber. He says he believes Brian planted the bombs, but strongly implied others were involved. I personally believe Brian is a patsy, and that if he was involved at all, it was most likely as a pawn for deep state entities (Capitol Police, FBI, etc. The FBI in particular has a history of exploiting mentally vulnerable people for plots). And the problem is precisely that if Brian Cole Jr. was working with others in some capacity, none of those players have been held accountable over five years later, he still is a patsy, and it is unconscionable that he is still in pretrial detention. And the very same corrupt players at the DOJ who were the reason for Trump having to issue pardons for Jan. 6’ers are still involved in the persecution of this patsy.

I had Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 on the show yesterday. It was great. He said something interesting about Brian Cole Jr. when I asked if he believed Brian was the pipe bomber. He says he believes Brian planted the bombs, but strongly implied others were involved. I personally believe Brian is a patsy, and that if he was involved at all, it was most likely as a pawn for deep state entities (Capitol Police, FBI, etc. The FBI in particular has a history of exploiting mentally vulnerable people for plots). And the problem is precisely that if Brian Cole Jr. was working with others in some capacity, none of those players have been held accountable over five years later, he still is a patsy, and it is unconscionable that he is still in pretrial detention. And the very same corrupt players at the DOJ who were the reason for Trump having to issue pardons for Jan. 6’ers are still involved in the persecution of this patsy.

Viva Frei

42,857 次观看 • 19 天前

BREAKING: Karo-Lying Leavitt was left squirming after the media held her feet to the fire, demanding she explain why Trump would appoint a top official who he then trashed as “weak” after he resigned in protest! Yesterday, the Trump administration was rocked by the abrupt departure of counterterror chief Joe Kent, who resigned in protest of Trump’s illegal Iran War because he believed it was being waged on behalf of Israel. Kent is no hero; he is a white supremacist and far-right extremist, which is why he got the job in the first place. But that didn’t stop Trump from trashing him as being “weak on security” in response to his resignation, which of course brings up new questions we need to have answered. Reporters asked Leavitt to explain the president’s decisions, and she was left scrambling. “The White House was warned last year when the president nominated Joe Kent that he had a history of conspiracy theories and ties to white nationalists. So why did the president nominate him?” asked a reporter. Good question! “The president spoke on this a little bit yesterday in the Oval Office. He said he always thought Joe Kent was a good guy, uh obviously has a commendable military record and experience. However, uh he was not someone who was involved in the presidential daily brief, part of the president's intelligence briefings over the last several months,” stuttered Leavitt. “We have not seen him here at the White House for quite some time and the president feels it's deeply disappointing that after the president gave him an opportunity in this administration to serve the American people that he would resign with a letter filled with falsehoods accusing the president of the United States by being controlled by a foreign country. That's both insulting and laughable all at the same time. The president is the leader of the most powerful country and military in the world. Nobody tells him what to do.” It couldn’t be more telling that when told this man had ties to white nationalists, Leavitt replies that Trump thought he was a “good guy,” and then immediately brings up that he doesn’t show up for work. But the media wouldn’t let this go. “Yesterday, the president posted that he always thought Kent was weak on security. Why would he appoint a counterterrorism center who he thought was weak on security?” asked the media in a follow-up. Another good question! “Again, I just told you the president gave Joe Kent a chance. He thought he was a good guy with good military experience and unfortunately he proved he was not up for the job and we don't want somebody leading the counterterrorism task force who cannot agree that the number one state sponsor of terror in this world uh did not pose a threat to the United States.” Karoline Leavitt herself said just two weeks ago that Iran did not pose a threat to the United States, but hey, who’s counting? Good to know we’re appointing top counterterrorism officials based on the fact that Trump thinks they’re a “good guy,” who is now a weak liar after disagreeing with the President on something. The ease with which this woman lies would astound the most devoted of Hitler’s propagandists. But there is something perversely amusing about watching her be left holding the bag for all of Trump’s terrible decisions. What a bunch of assh*les, the whole lot of them.

BREAKING: Karo-Lying Leavitt was left squirming after the media held her feet to the fire, demanding she explain why Trump would appoint a top official who he then trashed as “weak” after he resigned in protest! Yesterday, the Trump administration was rocked by the abrupt departure of counterterror chief Joe Kent, who resigned in protest of Trump’s illegal Iran War because he believed it was being waged on behalf of Israel. Kent is no hero; he is a white supremacist and far-right extremist, which is why he got the job in the first place. But that didn’t stop Trump from trashing him as being “weak on security” in response to his resignation, which of course brings up new questions we need to have answered. Reporters asked Leavitt to explain the president’s decisions, and she was left scrambling. “The White House was warned last year when the president nominated Joe Kent that he had a history of conspiracy theories and ties to white nationalists. So why did the president nominate him?” asked a reporter. Good question! “The president spoke on this a little bit yesterday in the Oval Office. He said he always thought Joe Kent was a good guy, uh obviously has a commendable military record and experience. However, uh he was not someone who was involved in the presidential daily brief, part of the president's intelligence briefings over the last several months,” stuttered Leavitt. “We have not seen him here at the White House for quite some time and the president feels it's deeply disappointing that after the president gave him an opportunity in this administration to serve the American people that he would resign with a letter filled with falsehoods accusing the president of the United States by being controlled by a foreign country. That's both insulting and laughable all at the same time. The president is the leader of the most powerful country and military in the world. Nobody tells him what to do.” It couldn’t be more telling that when told this man had ties to white nationalists, Leavitt replies that Trump thought he was a “good guy,” and then immediately brings up that he doesn’t show up for work. But the media wouldn’t let this go. “Yesterday, the president posted that he always thought Kent was weak on security. Why would he appoint a counterterrorism center who he thought was weak on security?” asked the media in a follow-up. Another good question! “Again, I just told you the president gave Joe Kent a chance. He thought he was a good guy with good military experience and unfortunately he proved he was not up for the job and we don't want somebody leading the counterterrorism task force who cannot agree that the number one state sponsor of terror in this world uh did not pose a threat to the United States.” Karoline Leavitt herself said just two weeks ago that Iran did not pose a threat to the United States, but hey, who’s counting? Good to know we’re appointing top counterterrorism officials based on the fact that Trump thinks they’re a “good guy,” who is now a weak liar after disagreeing with the President on something. The ease with which this woman lies would astound the most devoted of Hitler’s propagandists. But there is something perversely amusing about watching her be left holding the bag for all of Trump’s terrible decisions. What a bunch of assh*les, the whole lot of them.

Occupy Democrats

268,043 次观看 • 4 个月前

Donald Trump on why the press prefers the villain version of him: Larry King asks Melania what the public doesn't know about her husband. She points to his loyalty, his sense of humour, and the fact that he quietly helps people. King then mentions a friend who told him that if he ever had a problem, Trump would be the one he'd call — and asks Donald why he doesn't let that side out more. Trump's answer cuts to how he sees his own media image: "Well, I think the press doesn't really like hearing that, to be honest with you. I mean, I do a lot of things, and I don't like to talk about them, but they'd much rather see me, you know, beating someone up than being nice to somebody. You know, it fits the image better for them." He says it doesn't bother him. The image is the image, and once the press has decided who you are, that's the version they want to run with. Then he makes a more interesting point — that this is exactly why The Apprentice worked so well for him, in a way nobody expected: "What is interesting about the Apprentice is that I fire people. That's what I do. I fire people." King points out that firing people is a mean thing to do on television. Trump agrees, and then flips it: "I do a mean thing. And everyone thinks I'm so much nicer than before. You know, they used to think that I was doing this horrible flame throwing, terrible tyrant. Now I go on a television show where basically what I do is I fire people. And everyone thinks I'm such a nice guy. Which tells you what a bad image I had."

Donald Trump on why the press prefers the villain version of him: Larry King asks Melania what the public doesn't know about her husband. She points to his loyalty, his sense of humour, and the fact that he quietly helps people. King then mentions a friend who told him that if he ever had a problem, Trump would be the one he'd call — and asks Donald why he doesn't let that side out more. Trump's answer cuts to how he sees his own media image: "Well, I think the press doesn't really like hearing that, to be honest with you. I mean, I do a lot of things, and I don't like to talk about them, but they'd much rather see me, you know, beating someone up than being nice to somebody. You know, it fits the image better for them." He says it doesn't bother him. The image is the image, and once the press has decided who you are, that's the version they want to run with. Then he makes a more interesting point — that this is exactly why The Apprentice worked so well for him, in a way nobody expected: "What is interesting about the Apprentice is that I fire people. That's what I do. I fire people." King points out that firing people is a mean thing to do on television. Trump agrees, and then flips it: "I do a mean thing. And everyone thinks I'm so much nicer than before. You know, they used to think that I was doing this horrible flame throwing, terrible tyrant. Now I go on a television show where basically what I do is I fire people. And everyone thinks I'm such a nice guy. Which tells you what a bad image I had."

History Nerd

15,065 次观看 • 26 天前

Mark Zuckerberg on why he prefers to recruit people directly out of college In this interview from 2005, a 21-year-old Mark Zuckerberg is asked what he looks for in a new hire. There’s two things, he says. “Number one is raw intelligence. You can hire someone who has been doing software engineering for 10 years, and if they’ve been doing it for 10 years, that’s probably what they’ll be doing for the rest of their life. That’s cool — there are some things that that person can do and they’re definitely useful in an organization and can do a lot of stuff. But if you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has 10 years less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time they’ll be able to do a lot of things that [the person with 10 years of experience] will never be able to do. So that’s the most important thing that I look for.” The second thing he looks for is alignment with what the company is trying to do: “People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable, but if they don’t really believe in it, then they’re not going to work hard or care enough to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed. The best people I’ve hired so far have been people who didn’t really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electric engineers out of Stanford to do programming stuff, and they had very little programming experience going in, but they were really smart and really willing to go at it. The guy who just wrote photos was one of those guys, and if you’re willing to just do whatever it takes to get photos out, then you’re probably more valuable than someone who is just a career software engineer.” He concludes: “Those are the things I’m looking for and why I would rather recruit people out of college.” Video source: Stanford eCorner (2005)

Mark Zuckerberg on why he prefers to recruit people directly out of college In this interview from 2005, a 21-year-old Mark Zuckerberg is asked what he looks for in a new hire. There’s two things, he says. “Number one is raw intelligence. You can hire someone who has been doing software engineering for 10 years, and if they’ve been doing it for 10 years, that’s probably what they’ll be doing for the rest of their life. That’s cool — there are some things that that person can do and they’re definitely useful in an organization and can do a lot of stuff. But if you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has 10 years less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time they’ll be able to do a lot of things that [the person with 10 years of experience] will never be able to do. So that’s the most important thing that I look for.” The second thing he looks for is alignment with what the company is trying to do: “People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable, but if they don’t really believe in it, then they’re not going to work hard or care enough to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed. The best people I’ve hired so far have been people who didn’t really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electric engineers out of Stanford to do programming stuff, and they had very little programming experience going in, but they were really smart and really willing to go at it. The guy who just wrote photos was one of those guys, and if you’re willing to just do whatever it takes to get photos out, then you’re probably more valuable than someone who is just a career software engineer.” He concludes: “Those are the things I’m looking for and why I would rather recruit people out of college.” Video source: Stanford eCorner (2005)

Startup Archive

54,696 次观看 • 6 个月前